Distal Aortic Perfusion Research Articles

Safety and validity of selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage in open and endovascular aortic repair.

Although cerebrospinal fluid drainage has been shown to reduce the risk of ischemic spinal cord injury, serious complications have also been reported. We have been using it selectively in a pressure- and volume-regulated method and aimed to evaluate its safety, and its validity in elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair in a propensity-matched cohort. Among the 450 patients who underwent open surgery (n = 169) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 281) on the descending or thoracoabdominal aorta, 147 underwent cerebrospinal fluid drainage, which was prophylactic in 135 and therapeutic in 12. Prophylactic drainage was performed in elective open surgery under distal aortic perfusion (n = 67) or in selected patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 68). Drainage-related complications were observed in 13 (9.6%), one of which was graded severe (0.74%). In patients undergoing prophylactic drainage, spinal cord injury was detected in 2/135 (1.5%). In patients without prophylactic drainage, 15/315 (4.8%) developed spinal cord injury. Therapeutic drainage was performed in 12 of these 15 patients, 10 of whom remained paralytic in varying degree. In the inverse probability weighted analysis of the patients undergoing elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair, the incidence of spinal cord injury was lower with prophylactic drainage (p = 0.028). Pressure- and volume-regulated spinal drainage rarely causes serious complications. Its prophylactic use seems beneficial in selected patients, including those undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair with high risk for spinal cord injury.

Utility of motor-evoked potentials in contemporary open thoracoabdominal aortic repair

ObjectiveParaplegia remains one of the major complications of contemporary open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) act as a surrogate measure for spinal cord homeostasis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of intraoperative neuromonitoring in contemporary TAAA repair and its association with postoperative spinal cord ischemia (SCI). MethodsPatients who underwent open type 2 or 3 TAAA or completion aortic repair using intraoperative neuromonitoring were identified between May 2006 and November 2023. Patient demographics, comorbidities, indication for the procedure, procedural details, and outcomes were recorded. The groups were divided based on type of repair, and univariate statistics were then used to evaluate the association of these metrics vs the type of repair. ResultsSeventy-nine patients underwent open type 2 (N = 41) and 3 (N = 23) TAAA and completion aortic (N = 15; open in 14 and endovascular in 1) repairs by a single surgeon. The cohort was predominantly male (N = 48, 60.8%) with a mean age of 52.5 ± 16.2 years. There was a high incidence of hypertension (N = 53, 67.1%), smoking history (N = 42, 53.1%), and connective tissue disorders (N = 37, 46.8%). Operative indications included dissection-related (N = 50, 63.3%) and degenerative (N = 26, 32.9%) TAAA and dissection-related malperfusion (N = 3, 3.8%). Left heart bypass was often (N = 73, 92.4%) used for distal aortic perfusion, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage (N = 77, 97.5%) was a common adjunct. MEPs were classified as no change (N = 43, 54.4%), reversible change (N = 26, 32.9%), irreversible change (N = 4, 5.1%), and unreliable (N = 6, 7.6%). MEP changes were predominantly bilateral (N = 70, 88.6%) and occurred most often during repair of the abdominal aortic segment (N = 13, 16.5%). The median number of replaced vertebral levels was associated with MEP changes (P = .013). SCI was only observed in repairs greater than 6 replaced vertebral levels with an overall frequency of 17.7%. It was most prevalent in completion aortic repairs (26.7%). Immediate and delayed SCI occurred in 10.1% and 7.6% of patients, respectively; it was most commonly (71.8%) reversible. Permanent paraplegia occurred in four patients (5.1%), with equal immediate and delayed onsets. MEPs demonstrated poor sensitivity (53.9%) and specificity (62.3%) for SCI; however, there was a high negative predictive value (86.4%) in this population. In-hospital mortality occurred in five (6.3%) patients. ConclusionsNo changes in intraoperative MEPs are highly predictive of spinal cord homeostasis. The number of replaced vertebral levels and previous aortic repair should guide intraoperative neuroprotective measures including intercostal reimplantation and should take precedence over intraoperative monitoring, especially when MEP changes occur.

Early outcome of simplified total arch reconstruction under mild hypothermia (30–32 °C) with distal aortic perfusion

ObjectiveWe designed a simplified total arch reconstruction (s-TAR) technique which could be performed under mild hypothermia (30–32 °C) with distal aortic perfusion. This study aimed to compare its efficacy of organ protection with the conventional total arch reconstruction (c-TAR).MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data of 195 patients who had ascending aortic aneurysm with extended aortic arch dilation and underwent simultaneous ascending aorta replacement and TAR procedure between January 2018 and December 2022 in our center. 105 received c-TAR under moderate hypothermia (25–28 °C) with circulatory arrest (c-TAR group); rest 90 received s-TAR under mild hypothermia (30–32 °C) with distal aortic perfusion (s-TAR group).ResultsThe s-TAR group demonstrated shorter CPB time, cross-clamp time and lower body circulatory arrest time compared with the c-TAR group. The 30-day mortality was 2.9% for the c-TAR group and 1.1% for the s-TAR group (P = 0.043). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the s-TAR group. Paraplegia was observed in 4 of 105 patients (3.8%) in the c-TAR group, while no such events were observed in the s-TAR group. The incidence of temporary neurologic dysfunction was significantly higher in the c-TAR group. The incidence of permanent neurologic dysfunction also showed a tendency to be higher in the c-TAR group, without statistical significance. Furthermore, the incidence of reoperation for bleeding were significantly lower in the s-TAR group. The rate of postoperative hepatic dysfunction and all grades of AKI was remarkably lower in the s-TAR group. The 3-year survival rate was 95.6% in the s-TAR group and 91.4% in the c-TAR group.Conclusionss-TAR under mild hypothermia (30–32℃) with distal aortic perfusion is associated with lower mortality and morbidity, offering better neurological and visceral organ protection compared with c-TAR.

A multimodal approach to prevent spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism repair - from pathophysiology to anesthesiological management

Thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open repair is a high-risk surgery further burdened with both mortality and morbidity. Despite numerous experimental endeavors and technical advancements, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is still the most formidable morbidity to be resolved, irrespective of the open or endovascular surgical approach. It presents a spectrum of severity, ranging from temporary or permanent paraparesis to paraplegia with or without autonomic dysfunction. The timing of SCI occurrence is a crucial factor, with approximately 15% of cases manifesting intraoperatively, 50% within 48 h post-surgery, and the remaining 35% classified as late SCI, occurring more than 48 h after the procedure. The mechanism responsible for SCI is complex and multifactorial; hence, understanding its underlying pathophysiology is essential for its effective management. Over the last decade, strategies to enhance spinal cord perfusion and minimize the risk of SCI during TAAA open repair have been implemented. These include optimization of hemodynamics, hemoglobin levels, cardiac function, and cerebrospinal fluid pressure, ensuring collateral vascular network stability and distal aortic perfusion and intrathecal administration of drugs. A multimodal approach involving anesthesiologists and surgeons can lead to improved neurological recovery and a reduced incidence and severity of SCI.

Emergent open repair of a symptomatic type III thoracoabdominal aneurysm.

Emergent open repair of a symptomatic type III thoracoabdominal aneurysm.

Postoperative Intensive Care Management of Aortic Repair.

Vascular surgery patients have multiple comorbidities and are at high risk for perioperative complications. Aortic repair surgery has greatly evolved in recent years, with an increasing predominance of endovascular techniques (EVAR). The incidence of cardiac complications is significantly reduced with endovascular repair, but high-risk patients require postoperative ST-segment monitoring. Open aortic repair may portend a prohibitive risk of respiratory complications that could be a contraindication for surgery. This risk is greatly reduced in the case of an endovascular approach, and general anesthesia should be avoided whenever possible in the case of endovascular repair. Preoperative renal function and postoperative kidney injury are powerful determinants of short- and long-term outcome, so that preoperative risk stratification and secondary prevention are critical tasks. Intraoperative renal protection with selective renal and distal aortic perfusion is essential during open repair. EVAR has lower rates of postoperative renal failure compared to open repair, with approximately half the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) and one-third of the risk of hemodialysis requirement. Spinal cord ischemia used to be the most distinctive and feared complication of aortic repair. The risk has significantly decreased since the beginning of aortic surgery, with advances in surgical technique and spinal protection protocols, and is lower with endovascular repair. Endovascular repair avoids extensive aortic dissection and aortic cross-clamping and is generally associated with reduced blood loss and less coagulopathy. The intensive care physician must be aware that aortic repair surgery has an impact on every organ system, and the importance of early recognition of organ failure cannot be overemphasized.

Distal Perfusion With Modified Centrifugal Pump Circuit in Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

The left heart bypass is currently the most frequent adjunct to provide distal aortic perfusion during aortic clamping. However, closed-circuits cannot respond to sudden hemodynamic fluctuations during aortic clamping which may lead to complications. In this report, we aim to give the technical aspects of reservoir-added centrifugal pump circuit system, its implementation and the clinical outcomes. Between 2002 and 2020, the data of 35 patients underwent aortic aneurysm repair with the use of modified pump circuit were analyzed. The mean age was 53.4years (range 24-73) and 91.4% of all was male. Preoperative demographics, intraoperative pump data and postoperative clinical outcomes were reported. Thoracoabdominal incision was used in 22 patients (62.9%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage catheter was placed in 15 patients (42.9%). The left inferior pulmonary vein for outflow and the left femoral artery for inflow cannulation were used preferably. Median duration of pump support was 50mins (13-121) in the cohort. The median transfusion of red packed cells was 2units. Renal failure was observed in two patients and permanent paraplegia in one patient. Only one patient died in the elective group (1/34) and one patient in the emergent. The reservoir-added centrifugal pump is an effective, practical, and flexible perfusion system which should be in the armamentarium of surgeons in order to solve difficult problems during open repair of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Spinal cord protection in open and endovascular approaches to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Despite advancements in surgical and postoperative management, spinal cord injury has been a persistent complication of both open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Spinal cord injury can be explained with an ischemia-infarction model which results in local edema of the spinal cord, damaging its structure and leading to reversible or irreversible loss of its function. Perfusion of the spinal cord during aortic procedures can be enhanced by several adjuncts which have been described with a broad variety of evidence in their support. These adjuncts include systemic hypothermia, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, extracorporeal circulation and distal aortic perfusion, segmental arteries reimplantation, left subclavian artery revascularization, and staged aortic repair. The Authors here reviewed and discussed the role of such adjuncts in preventing spinal cord injury from occurring, pinpointing current evidence and outlining future perspectives.

Impact of distal aortic perfusion on 'segmental steal' depleting spinal cord blood flow-a quantitative experimental approach.

Aortic steal is an underestimated risk factor for intraoperative spinal cord ischaemia. A negative effect on spinal cord perfusion in thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair has been suspected if blood drains away from the cord initiated by a reversal of the arterial pressure gradient. The amount of blood and pressure loss via back-bleeding of segmental arteries and the impact of distal aortic perfusion (DaP) have not been analysed yet. The aim of our study was to quantify 'segmental steal' in vivo during simulated thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair and to determine the impact of DaP on steal and spinal cord perfusion. Ten juvenile pigs were put on cardiopulmonary bypass with DaP and visceral arteries were ligated. 'Segmental steal' was quantified by draining against gravity with/without DaP. Blood volume of 'segmental steal' was quantified and microspheres were injected for Post mortem spinal cord perfusion analysis. 'Segmental steal' was quantified with/without DaP-and with stopped DaP. Quantification revealed a significantly higher steal on cardiopulmonary bypass with DaP with a mean difference of 24(11) ml/min. In all spinal cord segments, blood flow was diminished during steal drainage on DaP, compared to 'no steal'. The least perfused region was the low thoracic to upper lumbar segment. 'Segmental steal' is a relevant threat to spinal cord perfusion-even with the utilization of DaP-diminishing spinal cord perfusion. The blood volume lost by back-bleeding of segmental arteries is not to be underestimated and occlusion of segmental arteries should be considered in thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair.

WHOLE BODY PERFUSION STRATEGY FOR AORTIC ARCH REPAIR UNDER NORMOTERMIA AND BEATING HEART TECHNIQUE IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS. THREE CLINICAL CASES

Introduction The incidence of aortic arch pathology in older children is rare. Most often this occurs as a result of a previous aortic arch operation and less often it could be detected primarily. Previously, we successfully used normothermic perfusion during neonatal aortic arch repair. In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of the method of selective whole body perfusion with coronary perfusion on the beating heart during aortic arch reconstruction in older children. Methods Between October 2019 and February 2021, 3 children underwent aortic arch surgery at our institution using the defined protocol. During the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), antegrade coronary perfusion on beating heart and distal retrograde femoral aortic perfusion at a constant blood temperature 36 C were used. During the surgery, cerebral and visceral perfusion were monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and transcranial dopplerography, electrocardiography and arterial blood gases. The data was collected prospectively. Results Patient one. Male, 6 years old, 27 kg. Elective admission. Diagnosis: Aortic arch hypoplasia. Surgery: Aortic arch reconstruction. CPB: Normothermic. Selective ACP, antegrade coronary perfusion on beating heart and distal retrograde femorall aortic perfusion. Flow 2,5 l/min. CPB time – 78 min, ACP – 44 min. BCA cannula – 14 fr, coronary cannula – 4fr, femoral artery cannula – 10 fr. Ultrafiltration during CPB. Mechanical ventilation - 18 hours post/op. Blood lactate 6 hours post/op – 1,8 mmol/l. ICU admission – 24 hours. Hospital discharge 12 days. Patient two, 17 y.o., 38 kg. Elective admission. Diagnosis: Aortic arch hypoplasia. The history of coarctation of the aorta surgery. Surgery: Aortic arch reconstruction. CPB: Normothermic. Selective ACP, antegrade coronary perfusion on beating heart and distal retrograde femorall aortic perfusion. Flow 2,5 l/min. CPB time – 136 min, ACP time – 54 min. BCA cannula – 14 fr, coronary cannula – 4fr, femoral artery cannula – 15 fr. Ultrafiltration during CPB. Mechanical ventilation – 4 hours post/op. Blood lactate 6 hours post/op – 2,6 mmol/l. ICU admission – 16 hours. Hospital discharge 17 days. Patient three. Female, 4 years old, 15 kg. Admitted urgently. Diagnosis: Critical aortic arch stenosis. Brachiocephalic artery (BCA) and left common carotid artery (LCCA) stenosis. The history of coarctation of the aorta surgery. Low ejection fraction. Surgery: Aortic arch, BCA and LCCA repair. CPB: Normothermic. Selective ACP, antegrade coronary perfusion on beating heart and distal retrograde femorall aortic perfusion. Flow 3 l/min. CPB time – 107 min, ACP – 68 min. BCA cannula – 12 fr, coronary cannula – 4fr, femoral artery cannula – 12 fr. Ultrafiltration during CPB. Mechanical ventilation - 44 hours post/op. Blood lactate 6 hours post/op – 1,6 mmol/l. ICU admission – 5 days. Hospital discharge 26 days. During surgery, laboratory and instrumental parameters were within reference values. Patients had no neurological deficiency during hospital stage. Discussion These clinical cases show that the whole-body perfusion with coronary perfusion on beating heart provide safe conditions during aortic arch surgery in children using normothermia. Using this protocol, we were able to eliminate risk factors: circulatory arrest, hypothermia, cardioplegia, extended

Acute Kidney Injury After Neonatal Aortic Arch Surgery: Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Versus Moderate Hypothermia With Distal Aortic Perfusion.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication observed after neonatal aortic arch repair. We studied its incidence after procedures carried out using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) versus moderate hypothermia with distal aortic perfusion (MHDP), usually through the common femoral artery. In both groups, continuous regional cerebral perfusion (RCP) was used during the time required for aortic arch repair. A total of 125 neonates underwent aortic arch repair. Between 2007 and 2012, DHCA with RCP was used in 51 neonates. From 2013 to 2019, MHDP with RCP was performed on 74 newborns. Operative complexity was similar in both periods. Acute kidney injury was defined as a significant elevation of serum creatinine and was classified according to the neonatal modified n-KDIGO (neonatal Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) stages 1 to 3 (Kidney Disease Improving: Global Outcomes). Acute kidney injury was observed in a total of 68 patients (68/125: 54.4%). In the majority (44/68: 64.7%), n-KDIGO stage 1 occurred. Stage 2 (n = 14) and stage 3 (n = 10) were observed more frequently after DHCA versus MHDP: 29.4% (15/51) versus 12.2% (9/74), P = .02. At cardiopulmonary bypass end, lactate levels were significantly higher (P = .001) after DHCA: 3.4 (2.9-4.3) mmol/L compared to 2.7 (2.3-3.7) mmol/L after MHDP. Early mortality was 12% (15/125) in the entire cohort. It was 17.6% (9/51) after DHCA versus 8.1% (6/74) after MHDP, however not statistically significant (P = .16). Mild (stage 1) AKI occurred frequently after neonatal aortic arch repair. The use of MHDP was associated with a significantly lower incidence of moderate (stage 2) and severe (stage 3) AKI forms.

Open thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair vs. f/bTEVAR - complementary or competitive?

The classical approach of open repair (OR) for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies, including aneurysms and dissection, has been outnumbered by the use of fenestrated/branched (thoracic) endovascular aortic repair (f/b[T]EVAR) in recent years. Providing OR for complex cases in an aortic service requires a dedicated surgical setup and a huge body of expertise in this particular field.In order to reduce specific complications, such as perioperative mortality, kidney failure, spinal cord ischemia, stroke or bowel ischemia, it is necessary to apply cerebrospinal-spinal fluid drainage, point-of-care coagulation therapy, distal and retrograde aortic perfusion and sequential clamping. Despite the predominance of endovascular solutions, the specific OR expertise is still needed for specific indications, such as young patients, connective tissue disorder or aortic graft infections.Currently, the short and mid term results for f/b(T)EVAR outweigh those for OR, including the shorter hospital stay and less invasive procedures. However, OR provides better long-term results for overall mortality, re-intervention rates and secondary complications.In conclusion, in our opinion OR is a service that is still necessary for dedicated aortic centres, but will most likely become more frequent again in the years to come.

Spinal Cord Protection of Aorto-Iliac Bypass in Open Repair of Extent II and III Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the serious complications of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and left heart bypass (LHB) are well-established extracorporeal circulatory assistance methods to increase distal aortic perfusion and prevent spinal cord ischaemia in TAAA repair. Aorto-iliac bypass, a new surgical adjunct offering distal aortic perfusion without the need of complex perfusion skills, was developed as a substitute for CPB and LHB. However, its spinal cord protective effect is unknown. The perioperative data of 183 patients who had elective open Crawford extent II and III TAAA repair at our aortic centre from July 2011 to May 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Spinal cord protection was compared between the aorto-iliac bypass group (n=106) and the extracorporeal circulatory assistance group (n=77 [65 CPB, 12 LHB]), and the risk factors for SCI in these patients were explored. Eleven (11) patients had postoperative SCI: five (6.5%) in the extracorporeal circulatory assistance group (four with CPB and one with LHB), and six (5.7%) in the aorto-iliac bypass group. The incidence of SCI was 6.0% (11/183 cases). There was no difference between the aorto-iliac bypass group and the extracorporeal circulatory assistance group (p=1.0), while operation time, proximal aortic clamp time, intercostal artery clamp time, and length of intensive care unit stay were all increased in the latter group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that cerebrospinal fluid pressure (odds ratio [OR] 1.270; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.092-1.478 [p=0.002]) and lowest haemoglobin on the first postoperative day (OR 0.610; 95% CI 0.416-0.895 [p=0.011]) were the independent predictors of SCI in TAAA repair. Spinal cord protection of aorto-iliac bypass is comparable to that of CPB and LHB in open TAAA repair.

Effect of cerebrospinal fluid pressure elevation on spinal cord perfusion during aortic cross-clamping with distal aortic perfusion.

Distal aortic perfusion (DaP) is a widely accepted protective adjunct facilitating early reinstitution of visceral perfusion during extended thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic repair. DaP has also been suggested to secure distal inflow to the paraspinal collateral network via the hypogastric arteries and thereby reduce the risk of spinal cord ischaemia. However, an increase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure is frequently observed during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of DaP on regional spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) during descending aortic cross-clamping and iatrogenic elevation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Eight juvenile pigs underwent central cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass according to our established experimental protocol followed by aortic cross-clamping of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta-mimicking sequential aortic clamping-with the initiation of DaP. Thereafter, CSF pressure elevation was induced by the infusion of blood plasma until baseline CSF pressure was tripled. At each time-point, microspheres of different colours were injected allowing for regional SCBF analysis. DaP led to a pronounced hyperperfusion of the distal spinal cord [SCBF up to 480%, standard deviation (SD): 313%, compared to baseline]. However, DaP provided no or only limited additional flow to the upper and middle segments of the spinal cord (C1-Th7: 5% of baseline, SD: 5%; Th8-L2: 24%, SD: 39%), which was compensated by proximal flow only at C1-Th7 level. Furthermore, DaP could not counteract an experimental CSF pressure elevation, which led to a further decrease in regional SCBF most pronounced in the mid-thoracic spinal cord segment. Protective DaP during thoraco-abdominal aortic repair may be associated with inadequate spinal protection particularly at the mid-thoracic spinal cord level ('watershed area') and result in the adverse effect of a potentially dangerous hyperperfusion of the distal spinal cord segments.

Open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery technique: how we do it.

More than four decades have passed since the modern principals to treat thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) have been established. The historical challenges in repair of TAAA are represented by - and continue to be - multiorgan protection. Among all organs, the spinal cord remains one of the most vital and vulnerable. We described our current techniques of open extent II TAAA repair, including the following topics: anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring, skin incision, exposure of the TAAA, left heart bypass, graft replacement technique, intercostal artery reattachment, visceral/renal artery reconstructions, and postoperative care. We use cerebrospinal fluid drainage, distal aortic perfusion, mild passive hypothermia, sequential clamping, and visceral and renal perfusion using roller pump in all the cases for multiorgan protection. Both motor-evoked potentials and somatosensory-evoked potentials ere used to guide the conduct of intercostal artery reattachment. Our group demonstrated that the use of adjuncts has reduced the overall spinal cord ischemia rate after Extent I TAAA from 15% to less than 2% and after Extent II TAAA from 33% (50% with clamp time exceeding 40 minutes in "clamp and go" era) to less than 4%. The current standard practice of TAAA repair with adjuncts has improved outcomes, especially regarding spinal cord ischemia.

Spinal cord protection in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a multimodal approach.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one major complication of open and endovascular thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Despite numerous neuroprotective adjuncts, the incidence of SCI remains high. This review article discusses established and novel adjuncts for spinal cord protection, including priming and preconditioning of the paraspinal collateral network, intraoperative systemic hypothermia, distal aortic perfusion, motor- and somatosensory evoked potentials and noninvasive cnNIRS monitoring as well as peri- and postoperative drainage of cerebrospinal fluid. Regardless of the positive influence of many of these strategies on neurologic outcome, to date no strategy assures definitive preservation of spinal cord integrity during and after aortic aneurysm repair.

Lumbar Drains After Cardiac Surgery: Evidence-Based Solutions for Safe Management.

Lumbar Drains After Cardiac Surgery: Evidence-Based Solutions for Safe Management.

Increased hospital volume is associated with reduced mortality after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveContemporary data on outcomes in open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair are limited to reports from major aortic referral centers showing excellent outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the national experience of open TAAA repair using national outcomes data, with a primary focus on the association of hospital volume with mortality and morbidity. MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 1998 to 2011, and all patients with a diagnosis of TAAA who underwent open operative repair were included. These patients were further stratified into tertiles based on the operative volume of the institution that performed the operation: low volume (LV), <3 cases/y; medium volume (MV), 3 to 11 cases/y; and high volume (HV), ≥12 cases/y. Baseline demographics as well as perioperative outcomes were compared between these groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of operative mortality and morbidity. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients presenting for elective surgery and for those presenting for urgent and emergent surgery. ResultsOverall operative mortality was 21% for the entire cohort. Operative mortality was higher at LV (26%) and MV (21%) centers compared with HV centers (15%; P < .001). This difference was similar in both elective surgery (LV, 18%; MV, 14%; HV, 12%; P < .001) and urgent and emergent surgery (LV, 34%; MV, 30%; HV, 19%; P < .001). Furthermore, rates of blood transfusion and acute renal failure were significantly lower in the HV group. Multivariable analysis revealed that compared with the HV group, patients operated on at LV centers (odds ratio [OR], 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-2.1; P < .001) and MV centers (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7; P < .001) had at least 1.5 times the odds of in-hospital mortality. The HV group also had significantly lower odds of dying in the subgroup analyses of both elective surgery and urgent and emergent surgery. Increasing TAAA volume was associated with increased use of distal aortic perfusion (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03; P < .001). ConclusionsPatients with TAAA in the United States operated on at HV centers have significantly lower mortality and morbidity compared with patients operated on at lower volume centers. Consideration of referral to HV centers may be warranted, but further research is required to justify this conclusion.

Surgical Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Non-High-Volume Institution.

Surgical thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair remains challenging. Apart from mortality, spinal cord injury (SCI) is a dreaded complication. We analyzed our experience to identify predictors for SCI in a nonhigh-volume institution. All patients who underwent TAAA repair between February 1996 and November 2016 (n = 182) were enrolled. Most were male (n = 121; 66.4%), median age was 68 years (range: 21-84). Elective operations were performed in 153 instances (84.1%). Our approach to minimize SCI includes distal aortic perfusion, mild hypothermia, identification of the Adamkiewicz artery, and sequential aortic clamping. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage was introduced in 2001 and liberal use of selective visceral perfusion in 2006. Early mortality was 12.1%; it was 8.5% after elective procedures. Reduced left ventricular function, nonelective setting, older age, and longer bypass time were identified as independent predictors for mortality in multivariable logistic regression model. Permanent SCI was observed in nine patients (4.9%), of whom seven (3.8%) developed paraplegia. In a multivariable logistic regression model for paraplegia, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), Crawford type II repair, smaller body surface area, and era before 2001 were identified as independent predictors, whereas only PAD was significant for SCI. The incidence of paraplegia was 13.8% in extensive repair out of the first 91 cases, whereas it was improved up to 2.7% thereafter. Using an integrated approach, acceptable outcome of TAAA repair can be achieved, even in a nonhigh-volume center. PAD and extensive involvement of the aorta are strong independent predictors for spinal cord deficit after TAAA repair.

Durability of open surgical repair of type I-III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

ObjectiveEarly outcomes and late mortality after open repair of extent I to III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are described, but late graft and aortic events are seldom detailed. This study investigated long-term aortic and graft outcomes as these data are increasingly important as endovascular repair matures. MethodsDuring 28 years, 516 patients underwent repair (type I, n = 177 [34%]; type II, n = 100 [20%]; type III, n = 239 [46%]). Patients were monitored for late events. Late aortic events were defined as native aortic disease leading to death or further intervention. Planned secondary procedures were excluded. Graft complications included anastomotic aneurysm, graft infection, and branch occlusions. Variables were assessed for association with end points using log-rank methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. ResultsIn-hospital death occurred in 40 patients (8%), leaving 476 for surveillance. Mean age was 69.8 ± 10.5 years. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 4.6 years. Repair conduct included distal aortic perfusion and motor evoked potential monitoring (n = 169 [35.5%]), clamp and sew (n = 307 [64.5%]), and selectively applied in-line mesenteric shunting (n = 172 [36.1%]). At the time of repair, 117 patients (24.6%) had 122 synchronous, noncontiguous aortic aneurysms. There were 98 late aortic and graft events in 89 patients (18.7%); 62 aortic-related events occurred in 56 patients (12%; elective repair, n = 47; emergent repair, n = 14; type A dissection, n = 1) at a mean of 4.4 ± 4.2 years after repair. Variables independently predictive of an aortic event were aortic clamp time (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02/min; P = .001), type III extent (HR, 2.5; P = .008), and expansion of retained aorta (HR, 10.4; P < .0005). There were 33 patients (7%) who experienced 36 graft-related events (anastomotic aneurysm, n = 14 [3% of cohort; aortic, n = 7; visceral patch, n = 6; side graft, n = 1]; graft infection, n = 12; renovisceral occlusion/repair, n = 9 [1.9%; side-arm graft, n = 8; native, n = 1]; and anastomotic stricture, n = 1) occurring at 4.7 ± 4.5 years. Variables predictive of graft-related complication were type II extent (HR, 3.4; P = .002) and distal aortic perfusion and motor evoked potential monitoring (HR, 3.6; P = .02). Freedom from aortic- or graft-related event was 80% at 5 years. Freedom from any aortic or graft reintervention was 84% at 5 years. Aortic-related mortality after discharge was 2.7% and estimated to be 3.1% at 5 years. Overall survival was 67% and 44% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. ConclusionsAfter type I-III TAAA repair, late aortic and graft-related events occur in 19% of patients. Native aortic disease sequelae are more common than graft complication. Aortic events are predicted by complex operation and degree of remaining aorta. Extensive reconstruction drives graft-related events. Ultimately, reintervention is rare and aorta-related mortality low. These findings verify durability of extensive TAAA repair, serving as benchmarks for endovascular repair.