Dissemination Of Research Findings Research Articles

Pediatric Cancer Communication on Twitter: Natural Language Processing and Qualitative Content Analysis.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter (recently rebranded as "X") was the most widely used social media platform with over 2 million cancer-related tweets. The increasing use of social media among patients and family members, providers, and organizations has allowed for novel methods of studying cancer communication. This study aimed to examine pediatric cancer-related tweets to capture the experiences of patients and survivors of cancer, their caregivers, medical providers, and other stakeholders. We assessed the public sentiment and content of tweets related to pediatric cancer over a time period representative of the COVID-19 pandemic. All English-language tweets related to pediatric cancer posted from December 11, 2019, to May 7, 2022, globally, were obtained using the Twitter application programming interface. Sentiment analyses were computed based on Bing, AFINN, and NRC lexicons. We conducted a supplemental nonlexicon-based sentiment analysis with ChatGPT (version 3.0) to validate our findings with a random subset of 150 tweets. We conducted a qualitative content analysis to manually code the content of a random subset of 800 tweets. A total of 161,135 unique tweets related to pediatric cancer were identified. Sentiment analyses showed that there were more positive words than negative words. Via the Bing lexicon, the most common positive words were support, love, amazing, heaven, and happy, and the most common negative words were grief, risk, hard, abuse, and miss. Via the NRC lexicon, most tweets were categorized under sentiment types of positive, trust, and joy. Overall positive sentiment was consistent across lexicons and confirmed with supplemental ChatGPT (version 3.0) analysis. Percent agreement between raters for qualitative coding was 91%, and the top 10 codes were awareness, personal experiences, research, caregiver experiences, patient experiences, policy and the law, treatment, end of life, pharmaceuticals and drugs, and survivorship. Qualitative content analysis showed that Twitter users commonly used the social media platform to promote public awareness of pediatric cancer and to share personal experiences with pediatric cancer from the perspective of patients or survivors and their caregivers. Twitter was frequently used for health knowledge dissemination of research findings and federal policies that support treatment and affordable medical care. Twitter may serve as an effective means for researchers to examine pediatric cancer communication and public sentiment around the globe. Despite the public mental health crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic, overall sentiments of pediatric cancer-related tweets were positive. Content of pediatric cancer tweets focused on health and treatment information, social support, and raising awareness of pediatric cancer.

Effect of passive leg raising on the cross-sectional area of the right internal jugular vein in patients with obesity: a randomised controlled trial protocol

BackgroundVenous access in patients with obesity presents significant challenges. The success of central venous catheterisation largely depends on the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the internal jugular vein (IJV). While techniques...

Abstract PO5-12-02: Landscape analysis of oncology nutrition research among patients being treated for breast cancer

Abstract The American Institute for Cancer Research/World Cancer Research Fund and the American Cancer Society regularly conduct systematic reviews on the evidence supporting nutrition interventions during cancer treatment. These reviews have found that the evidence to support clinical oncology nutrition practice guidelines is limited. It is unclear how many oncology nutrition studies are currently being conducted, especially among patients being treated for breast cancer. The goal of this project was to conduct a landscape analysis of nutrition research being conducted among breast cancer patients over the past 10 years. Methods: This analysis was part of a larger effort to describe the oncology nutrition research landscape for all cancer sites. Searches of ClinicalTrials.gov were performed on 1/8/2023 using the following search terms/combinations: “cancer AND nutrition”, “cancer nutrition”, “oncology AND nutrition”, “diet AND cancer”, “cancer, oncology, neoplasms, nutrition, diet”. Search results were downloaded as .csv files and uploaded to RStudio for merging and data cleaning (elimination of duplicates, and exclusion of studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov before 1/1/2013 or after 12/31/2022). The resulting harmonized dataset was then uploaded to REDCap, and each entry was reviewed for eligibility by one of the authors. To be included in this landscape analysis, studies must have included data collection from patients who were actively receiving cancer treatment at the time of the study and the study had to be first posted to ClinicalTrials.gov between 1/1/2013 and 12/31/2022. Studies were excluded if they: 1) focused on the role of diet in primary cancer prevention, 2) focused on cancer survivors who had completed primary treatment for their cancers. Following eligibility review, the study datafile was returned to RStudio for further cleaning and analysis. Results: The initial ClinicalTrials.gov search identified 4,345 unique study listings. After review, 1,267 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 132 (10.4%) studies were specific to breast cancer (117 intervention studies and 15 observational studies). Among breast cancer studies, reasons for exclusion were: study focused on diet/nutrition in the prevention of a primary cancer diagnosis (n=40), study participants had already completed their cancer treatment (n=128), study did not include a diet/nutrition intervention or assessment (n=31). The largest number of breast cancer specific studies were based in the United States (n=55, 41.6%), Italy (n=11, 8.3%), France (n=10, 7.6%) and Canada (n=9, 6.8%). Dietary supplement interventions were the most common type of intervention (n=50 studies, 42.7%), followed by behavior change interventions (n=22, 18.8%), diet in relation to a drug intervention (n=25, 21.4%), diet in relation to a device/procedure/radiation intervention (n=16, 14%), fasting/time-restricted feeding studies (n=13, 11.1%) and ketogenic diet interventions (n=3, 2.6%). Changes in weight or body composition (n=52, 39.4%), quality of life (n=45, 34.1%), adverse events (n=24, 18.2%), survival (n=20, 15,2%) and fatigue (n=17, 12.9%) were the most common outcome measures. Sixteen (12.1%) studies were supported by NIH funding and 9 (6.8%) studies were industry funded, although the majority (n=124, 93.9%) reported funding from “other” sources. Of the 41 studies that started between 2013-2017 (five years prior to the January 2023 ClinicalTrials.gov search), only 21 (51.2%) were listed as being “completed” and of those, only 7 were listed as “has results”. Conclusion: More research is needed to support evidence-based supportive care guidelines for oncology nutrition interventions during breast cancer treatment. Efforts should be made to support researchers in completing studies and disseminating research findings. Citation Format: Kim Robien, Heather Wopat. Landscape analysis of oncology nutrition research among patients being treated for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-12-02.

American Indian and Alaska Native recruitment strategies for health-related randomized controlled trials: A scoping review.

Significant health disparities exist among American Indian and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs), yet AI/ANs are substantially underrepresented within health-related research, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although research has previously charted representation inequities, there is however a gap in the literature documenting best practice for recruitment techniques of AI/ANs into RCTs. Therefore, the aim of this review was to systematically gather and analyze the published literature to identify common strategies for AI/AN participant recruitment for RCTs in the US. A scoping review methodology was engaged with a systematic search operationalized within relevant databases to February 19, 2022, with an additional updated search being carried out up until January 1, 2023: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. A two-stage article review process was engaged with double reviewers using Covidence review software. Content analysis was then carried out within the included articles by two reviewers using NVivo software to identify common categories within the data on the topic area. Our review identified forty-one relevant articles with the main categories of recruitment strategies being: 1) recruitment methods for AI/ANs into RCTs (passive advertising recruitment approaches, individual-level recruitment approaches, relational methods of recruitment); 2) recruitment personnel used within RCTs; and, 3) relevant recruitment setting. The majority of the included studies used a culturally relevant intervention, as well as a community-involved approach to operationalizing the research. Increasing AI/AN representation in RCTs is essential for generating evidence-based interventions that effectively address health disparities and improve health outcomes. Researchers and funding agencies should prioritize the engagement, inclusion, and leadership of AI/AN communities throughout the RCT research process. This includes early community involvement in study design, implementation of culturally tailored recruitment strategies, and dissemination of research findings in formats accessible to AI/AN communities.

Comparison of Virtual Learning Community Construction between China and the United States Based on KH Coder Text Data Mining

Virtual learning communities, as an innovative online education model, have gained significant attention worldwide. The virtual learning communities in the United States are characterized by advanced educational models, innovative technological applications, and rich practical experiences. Exploring and drawing lessons from the construction of virtual learning communities in the United States is of great value to China. This paper utilizes KH Coder as an analysis tool and conducts literature searches on the Web of Science for U.S. literature and on the CNKI database for Chinese literature. The analysis covers the period from 2019 to 2024, and includes frequency and network co-linearity analyses. The research findings indicate the following: First, Chinese online education research emphasizes the importance of technological application and innovation in the field of education. Second, Chinese online teaching research has certain limitations in terms of research scope. Third, there are certain issues in the dissemination of research findings in Chinese online teaching research. Based on the research results, the following adjustments should be made for Chinese virtual learning communities: First, the comparison of research literature between China and the United States shows that the development of virtual learning communities requires diverse collaborations. Second, the development of virtual learning communities requires continuous technological innovation. Third, the comparison of research literature between China and the United States reminds us that the development of virtual learning communities needs to focus on social interaction. Fourth, the development of virtual learning communities also requires teacher support and participation. Fifth, the development of virtual learning communities needs to encourage students' active participation and autonomous learning.

Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Clinical Trials on Psychological Stress and Oral Health (1967-2024).

Stress is ubiquitous in modern life, influencing various facets of human health and well-being. While the impact of stress on mental and physical health is well-documented, its effects on oral health have garnered increasing attention in recent years. This bibliometric analysis explores the literature on the impact of stress on oral health. The study utilizes data from the PubMed database, focusing on publication trends, influential contributors and the temporal analysis of their publications, coauthorship analysis of authors and institutions, key thematic clusters, thematic evolution, and collaboration between various countries. Examining clinical trials investigating the impact of stress on oral health unveils significant trends and insights. Over time, there has been a steady rise in publication frequency, although with occasional fluctuations, indicating an increasing interest in the subject. The University of California has been identified as a leading institution, while Psychoneuroendocrinology emerges as a pivotal journal for disseminating research findings in the field. Keyword analysis reveals diverse thematic clusters, reflecting the multifaceted nature of the impact of stress on oral health. The analysis of topic trends showcases significant shifts over different periods, from basic correlations between mental health conditions and physiological indicators to a broader exploration of psychological interventions and social contexts in recent years. Thematic evolution analysis further elucidates this progression, categorizing themes into motor, basic, niche, and emerging or declining categories. Additionally, the analysis of corresponding authors' countries uncovers patterns of collaborative efforts, with the United States leading in collaboration levels. In summary, these analyses collectively highlight an evolving comprehension of the impact of stress on oral health, providing valuable insights for clinical practice and guiding future research endeavors.

Evolving Narratives in Tourism and Climate Change Research: Trends, Gaps, and Future Directions

This study presents a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of tourism and climate change research over the past decade by leveraging bibliometric analysis and a dataset sourced from the Scopus Database. The study scrutinised over 3400 English language articles. The analysis reveals a remarkable surge in publications, signifying the growing recognition of climate change’s multifaceted impact on tourism. However, a noteworthy geographical disparity emerges, with many regions remaining underrepresented in the literature, particularly in Africa and the Middle East. This oversight is concerning, given the vulnerability of these regions to climate change and their burgeoning tourism industries. The study also highlights the pivotal role of influential scholars, funding organisations, and publication outlets in shaping the research landscape. The European Commission and the National Natural Science Foundation of China are major funders. At the same time, journals like Sustainability and the Journal of Sustainable Tourism serve as prominent platforms for disseminating research findings. The analysis uncovers thematic trends, including the growing focus on climate change modelling and its implications for destination planning. However, research gaps persist, notably in sports tourism and climate resilience within the tourism sector. In conclusion, this study offers valuable insights into the current state of tourism and climate change research, pinpointing areas that demand increased attention and inclusivity. It is a valuable resource for scholars, policymakers, and stakeholders working towards a sustainable and resilient future for the global tourism industry in the face of climate change.

279 Highlighting the Expansion and Reach of the Meharry-Vanderbilt Community Engaged Research Core (CERC) Researcher Training Series

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: * Describe the Community Engaged Research Core (CERC) Researcher Training Program modules and objectives. * Examine the expansion and reach of the CERC Researcher Training Program across various institutions/organizations. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Through joint efforts from Meharry Medical College and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, the Community Engaged Research Core (CERC) Researcher Training Program began as a resource to provide CERC post-docs with knowledge of the basic principles of community engaged research (CEnR). It has since expanded to reach researchers at different institutions/organizations. This series examines topics from ethics to dissemination of research findings. The purpose of this project is to describe the CERC Researcher Training Program modules and present the expansion and reach of the training series. We examined both online training requests and series evaluations to determine: (1) participant reach, (2) number of module requests, and (3) purpose for using training modules. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Since its inception in 2018, the program has expanded to reach 16 institutions/organizations across the United States. On average, 45 researchers register for the training series and approximately 16 researchers participate each year. As time progresses, the number of registrants and attendees continues to increase. To date, there have been 110 online training module requests. The majority (~75%) of participants are requesting content for self-training purposes, while others are using the information to train others in their home institutions/organizations (~25%). Researchers are using modules for a range of reasons including recruitment, career development, and developing their own CEnR training. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: CEnR has the ability to make research better in how it is planned, executed and disseminated. Implementing the CERC researcher training series and expanding its reach demonstrates the desire and need to alleviate health disparities through researcher and community partnerships.

213 Accelerating Translational Science Through Dissemination Grants with Community Impact

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Promoting Academics and Community Engagement (PACE) Dissemination grants are funding opportunities via the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research Community Engagement program designed to support the science of clinical and translational research demonstrating community impact. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Two statewide funding announcements over a 3-month period were issued to over 2,000 academic and community partners. Proposals were required to meet the following criteria: 1) data collection from an academic and community partnered research project completed; 2) research findings analyzed; and 3) a community-focused dissemination plan developed. Projects were funded up to $5000. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Six PACE dissemination grants with community-focused plans were funded spanning Southeast, Western, and the Upper Peninsula regions of Michigan, as well as statewide. Examples of funded projects topics areas include the following: firearm safety; housing discrimination; opioid misuse; suicide prevention; and youth mental health. Community dissemination activities include: a) presenting at a community town hall; b) writing a pamphlet for community use; c) creating artwork installation showcase for community display; d) storytelling through community channels; and e) designing and implementing a local social media campaign. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Traditional funding mechanisms often do not provide resources to disseminate research findings with community benefit or impact back to communities. Funding dissemination awards through the PACE mechanism directly supports and accelerates translational science by sharing results directly back to the community in meaningful ways.

Connecting Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder Clinical Trials Through Data Harmonization: Wake Forest IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC).

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed the NIH HEAL Integrative Management of chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) network to address the interconnected nature of chronic pain (CP) and opioid use disorder (OUD), which are influenced by mental health. The network aims to develop integrated treatment pathways across multiple sites in the United States. The IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC) is proposed to support the NIH HEAL IMPOWR network by developing a CP- and OUD-focused infrastructure that includes measures of stigma, trauma, and quality of life. This includes deploying a data framework to link clinical sites, developing an educational infrastructure to address stigma and health disparities, and disseminating research findings. The IDEA-CC will standardize data collection processes, develop web-based data commons, and facilitate data sharing opportunities. The IDEA-CC will support the development and validation of composite CP and OUD measures and will develop educational materials to address stigma and health disparities. Overall, the IDEA-CC will create a research community and data commons that connect NIH HEAL IMPOWR centers to translate findings and develop a key CP-OUD research data, and education infrastructure.

ACM’s transition to an English journal: A leap towards international recognition

The Annals of Clinical Microbiology (Ann Clin Microbiol, ACM) serves as the official journal of the Korean Society of Clinical Microbiology. It is dedicated to publishing research articles encompassing all facets of clinical microbiology, intending to disseminate research findings pertinent to scholarly endeavors within the realm of clinical microbiology for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of infections in humans. Clinical microbiology stands as a pivotal discipline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases in modern society. The publication of articles within the domain of clinical microbiology assumes a significant role in the dissemination and progression of advanced medical technology and knowledge. It provides a platform for various issues such as the discovery and treatment of new infectious diseases and the problem of antibiotic resistance. In Korea, this journal stands as the sole academic publication primarily dedicated to clinical microbiology, garnering substantial recognition for its academic contributions in this arena.

The V-BRCH Project: Strengthening HIV Research Capacity in Nigeria through Intensive Workshops in Implementation Science and Grant Writing.

As persons with HIV live longer as the result of antiretroviral therapy, morbidity from HIV-associated noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing. The Vanderbilt-Nigeria Building Research Capacity in HIV and Noncommunicable Diseases program is a training platform created with the goal of training a cohort of successful Nigerian investigators to become leaders in HIV-associated NCD research. We describe survey findings from two week-long workshops in Kano, Nigeria, where trainees received instruction in implementation science and grant writing. Surveys assessed participants' self-perceived knowledge and confidence in topics taught during these workshops. Thirty-seven participants (all assistant professors) attended the implementation science workshop; 30 attended the grant-writing workshop. Response rates for the implementation science workshop were 89.2% for the preworkshop survey and 91.9% for the postworkshop survey. For the grant-writing workshop, these values were 88.2% and 85.3%, respectively. Improvement in participant knowledge and confidence was observed in every domain measured for both workshops. On average, a 101.4% increase in knowledge and a 118.0% increase in confidence was observed across measured domains among participants in the implementation science workshop. For the grant-writing workshop, there was a 68.8% increase in knowledge and a 70.3% increase in confidence observed. Participants rated the workshops and instructors as effective for both workshops. These workshops improved participants' knowledge and competence in implementation science and grant writing, and provide a model for training programs that aim to provide physician scientists with the skills needed to compete for independent funding, conduct locally relevant research, and disseminate research findings.

#SharingHEOR: Developing Modern Media for Communication and Dissemination of Health Economics and Outcomes Research.

Questions regarding the effectiveness and safety of health interventions and allocation of health care resources are frequently discussed in mainstream and social media. Additionally, government and foundation funders are increasingly mandating that results be disseminated to the lay public and patients may benefit from being able to digest scientific research regarding their health conditions. Therefore, it is important to widely disseminate and clearly communication health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) findings to a range of interested parties. Digital media features such as graphical or visual abstracts, infographics and videos are informative and add value to research articles by improving reader engagement with articles, potentially increasing their impact, and allowing results to be more widely disseminated. However, use of novel digital media for research dissemination has been relatively limited to date. In this article, we discuss the rationale for developing novel media to communicate and disseminate research findings and offer practical advice for doing so. We conclude by outlining a future agenda for research regarding HEOR communication and dissemination.

My Experience in Information Dissemination

Abstract My name is Drew Milne, and this article describes my experiences working to disseminate research findings. I’ve always been fascinated with the ways people communicate, and I wanted my work to contribute to helping people. In this article, I describe my pathway to becoming an information dissemination specialist. I also share important lessons I learned as I built my career. Finally, I offer suggestions on how researchers can support more self-advocates to work as information dissemination specialists. If we can all be more willing to listen closely to people who may not express themselves in exactly the same way as we do, we can all experience the benefits of new ideas we may have never heard before.

Digital Intervention Services to Promote HIV Self-Testing and Linkage to Care Services: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis-Global Trends and Future Directions.

Objective: The global burden of HIV remains a critical public health challenge, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, home to over two-thirds of individuals living with HIV. HIV self-testing (HIVST) has emerged as a promising strategy endorsed by the World Health Organization to achieve UNAIDS targets. Despite its potential, challenges persist in linking self-testers to care post a positive result. Digital health interventions, including chatbots and mobile applications, offer innovative solutions to address this gap. However, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the collaboration and growth in the literature at the intersection of HIVST and digital interventions is lacking. Methods: The study employs a bibliometric approach, leveraging data from the Web of Science, to analyze the characteristics, citation pattern and content of 289 articles spanning 1992-2023. The analysis involves performance assessment, scientific collaboration analysis, science mapping, and content analysis. Key bibliometric indicators, such as annual growth rate, citation impact, and authorship patterns, are explored. Collaboration patterns among countries, institutions, and authors are elucidated, and thematic mapping provides insight into the key research themes. Results: The analysis reveals a dynamic and expanding field, with an annual scientific growth rate of 12.25%. Notable contributions come from diverse sources, including North America, Europe, and Africa. High-impact journals such as JMIR mHealth and uHealth play a crucial role in disseminating research findings. African authors, including Lebelonyane R, Ford N, and Lockman S, feature prominently, reflecting a positive trend in diverse authorship. Co-citation analysis highlights influential manuscripts, with systematic reviews dominating the top-cited articles. Collaboration analysis underscores strategic partnerships globally, particularly involving the United States, Australia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Conclusion: This bibliometrics analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the digital health landscape in HIVST and linkage to care. It identifies key contributors, high-impact journals, and collaborative networks. The thematic map reveals nuanced research domains, including alcohol dependence, men's health, outcomes, and user acceptance. The findings offer insights for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, guiding future directions in the evolving intersection of HIVST and digital health interventions.

Abstract TP111: Attitudes and Perceptions Regarding Patient Engagement and Knowledge Translation in Stroke Research: Results From the PERSPECT Qualitative Study

Background: Patient engagement and knowledge translation are increasingly recognized as critical components of stroke research. However, it is unclear how these components are currently perceived by interested parties. Methods: The PERSPECT (Priorities and Expectations of Researchers, Donors, Patients, and the Public Regarding the Funding and Conduct of Stroke Research) qualitative study involved in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients, members of the general public, researchers, and donors, including board members of funding organizations and philanthropists. Participants were asked to discuss their thoughts about the role of patient and public engagement in stroke research and on the translation/dissemination of research findings. Collected data were analyzed through constant comparison and theme identification, followed by grounded theory content analysis. Results: Forty-one interviews were completed (11 with researchers and 10 for each patients, public and donors). An important theme that emerged was a need to re-evaluate and broaden conventional definitions of “expertise” in the context of selecting grant application review panels, recognizing the value of lived experience alongside that of education and professional experience. Whereas participants identified an important role for patient voices in guiding research direction and design; concerns were raised about the limited public awareness and understanding of medical research, which may hinder meaningful, advantageous involvement in the research process, as well as trust in evidence-based recommendations. In this regard, lay participants highlighted media-driven misinformation and a lack of credible lay-language resources as impeding effective dissemination of research findings. Conclusions: All four participant groups recognized the importance of knowledge end-users being engaged in research from its early stages, including decision-making about funding allocation. Impactful involvement seems however hindered by knowledge and communication gaps between the research and lay communities. Our results underscore the importance of efforts to make ongoing research and study findings more visible, accessible, and comprehensible.

The Importance of scientific writing training courses in enhancing the dissemination of research findings

This brief article emphasizes the vital significance of mastering the intricate skill of crafting scientific articles effectively, especially in the context of pediatric research. A well-crafted scientific article not only showcases the depth of research conducted, but also serves as a conduit for sharing valuable insights and discoveries with the wider scientific community. The article highlights that scientific publications are not mere compilations of data; they are instruments of knowledge transfer, enabling medical professionals, researchers, and policymakers to stay abreast of the latest developments in pediatric healthcare. By adhering to the highest standards of scientific writing, researchers can effectively bridge the gap between complex research outcomes and their practical implications. Medical practitioners and healthcare providers rely on these publications to inform their decision-making processes, ensuring that the treatments and interventions provided to young patients are rooted in the latest scientific research. Moreover, policymakers and funding agencies use these articles to make informed decisions about resource allocation, ultimately influencing the trajectory of pediatric healthcare at a societal level.In conclusion, this article emphasizes why the mastery of scientific writing in the context of medical research is not just an academic pursuit, but it is also a powerful catalyst for progress and innovation in the field of medicine. By honing their skills in crafting meticulously written scientific articles, researchers contribute significantly to the advancement of pediatric healthcare, ultimately improving the lives of people around the world.

How many authors are (too) many? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of authorship in biomedical publications

Publishing in academic journals is primary to disseminate research findings, with authorship reflecting a scientist’s contribution, yielding academic recognition, and carrying significant financial implications. Author numbers per article have consistently risen in recent decades, as demonstrated in various journals and fields. This study is a comprehensive analysis of authorship trends in biomedical papers from the NCBI PubMed database between 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Entrez Direct (EDirect) E-utilities to retrieve bibliometric data from a dataset of 17,015,001 articles. For all publication types, the mean author number per publication significantly increased over the last two decades from 3.99 to 6.25 (+ 57%, p < 0.0001) following a linear trend (r2 = 0.99) with an average relative increase of 2.28% per year. This increase was highest for clinical trials (+ 5.67 authors per publication, + 97%), the smallest for case reports (+ 1.01 authors, + 24%). The proportion of single/solo authorships dropped by a factor of about 3 from 17.03% in 2000 to 5.69% in 2020. The percentage of eleven or more authors per publication increased ~ sevenfold, ~ 11-fold and ~ 12-fold for reviews, editorials, and systematic reviews, respectively. Confirming prior findings, this study highlights the escalating authorship in biomedical publications. Given potential unethical practices, preserving authorship as a trustable indicator of scientific performance is critical. Understanding and curbing questionable authorship practices and inflation are imperative, as discussed through relevant literature to tackle this issue.

Use of Machine Learning Tools in Evidence Synthesis of Tobacco Use Among Sexual and Gender Diverse Populations: Algorithm Development and Validation.

From 2016 to 2021, the volume of peer-reviewed publications related to tobacco has experienced a significant increase. This presents a considerable challenge in efficiently summarizing, synthesizing, and disseminating research findings, especially when it comes to addressing specific target populations, such as the LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, Two Spirit, and other persons who identify as part of this community) populations. In order to expedite evidence synthesis and research gap discoveries, this pilot study has the following three aims: (1) to compile a specialized semantic database for tobacco policy research to extract information from journal article abstracts, (2) to develop natural language processing (NLP) algorithms that comprehend the literature on nicotine and tobacco product use among sexual and gender diverse populations, and (3) to compare the discoveries of the NLP algorithms with an ongoing systematic review of tobacco policy research among LGBTQ+ populations. We built a tobacco research domain-specific semantic database using data from 2993 paper abstracts from 4 leading tobacco-specific journals, with enrichment from other publicly available sources. We then trained an NLP model to extract named entities after learning patterns and relationships between words and their context in text, which further enriched the semantic database. Using this iterative process, we extracted and assessed studies relevant to LGBTQ+ tobacco control issues, further comparing our findings with an ongoing systematic review that also focuses on evidence synthesis for this demographic group. In total, 33 studies were identified as relevant to sexual and gender diverse individuals' nicotine and tobacco product use. Consistent with the ongoing systematic review, the NLP results showed that there is a scarcity of studies assessing policy impact on this demographic using causal inference methods. In addition, the literature is dominated by US data. We found that the product drawing the most attention in the body of existing research is cigarettes or cigarette smoking and that the number of studies of various age groups is almost evenly distributed between youth or young adults and adults, consistent with the research needs identified by the US health agencies. Our pilot study serves as a compelling demonstration of the capabilities of NLP tools in expediting the processes of evidence synthesis and the identification of research gaps. While future research is needed to statistically test the NLP tool's performance, there is potential for NLP tools to fundamentally transform the approach to evidence synthesis.

Design of Interactive Health Promotion Portal Prototype at House of Health Promotion TeFa

TeFa House of Health Promotion at Polije is a Teaching Factory that is currently initiated by the Health Department's Health Promotion study program. This TeFa serves as a platform for health communication, information, and education, as well as a space for research and the dissemination of research findings by faculty and students. Based on the conducted situation analysis, TeFa Health Promotion House currently lacks integration of communication, information, and education media into health promotion activities. This deficiency leads to suboptimal management of health media content. The aim of this research is to create a web portal design for this problem. The method used to develop this portal design is the User-Centered Design method. The results of testing and design analysis conclude that the portal design developed aligns with user expectations. The main features include Articles, Consultations, Videos, Audio, and Polls. For further research, the design can be expanded into an application