Dissection For Early Gastric Cancer Research Articles

Outcomes and validity of risk stratification tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in Western Australia

Outcomes and validity of risk stratification tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in Western Australia

Helicobacter pylori infection increases risk of bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is commonly used to treat early gastric cancer (EGC). The effects of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection on ESD and the potential benefits of preoperative eradication of HP remain unclear. The study aims to evaluate the impact of HP infection on bleeding and lesion detection during ESD in patients with EGC. We retrospectively analyzed 634 consecutive patients who underwent ESD for EGC at our center between January 2018 and January 2023. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of HP infection status on intraoperative bleeding and lesion detection rates. We developed a predictive model based on selected indicators and evaluated its performance using the ROC curve. HP-positive patients experienced a higher rate of intraoperative bleeding (28.8%) compared with HP-negative patients (8.9%) (P < 0.001). HP-positive patients also had longer procedure time (median: 58.5 vs. 50.0min, P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stays (median: 4.35 vs. 4.07days, P = 0.036). Multivariate analysis identified HP-positive (OR = 4.84), multiple lesions (OR = 1.81), specimen size > 40mm (OR = 3.67), and submucosal invasion (OR = 2.27) as independent risk factors for intraoperative bleeding. The predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.807 (95%CI 0.761-0.852), with a sensitivity of 72.1% and specificity of 75.9%. Preoperative HP eradication was associated with an increased rate of lesion detection (OR = 2.82). Eradicating HP before ESD in patients with EGC reduces intraoperative bleeding and improves lesion detection. Preoperative HP eradication is therefore recommended in patients with EGC.

Rates and risk factors of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with continuous warfarin or 1-day withdrawal of direct oral anticoagulants.

The 2017 Japanese guidelines recommend continuing warfarin therapy during the perioperative period or discontinuing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) only on the day of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. However, their safety has not been sufficiently explored. This study aimed to validate this management method. This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection between July 2017 and June 2019. The patients were categorized according to the use of warfarin or DOACs. Among the 62 eligible patients, 53 (85%) were male (median age, 76years). Warfarin was used in 10 patients (16%) and DOACs in 52 patients (84%). Fourteen patients taking DOACs (27%) used concomitant antiplatelet agents, with seven patients (13%) continuing treatment at the time of the endoscopic procedure. No postprocedural bleeding occurred in patients receiving warfarin (0%), whereas 10 cases (19%) of bleeding occurred in patients receiving DOACs: rivaroxaban, 0% (0/22); dabigatran, 0% (0/2); edoxaban, 43% (6/14); and apixaban, 29% (4/14). The type of anticoagulant (P<0.01) and continuation of antiplatelet therapy (P=0.02) were risk factors for postprocedural bleeding in patients receiving DOACs. Intraprocedural bleeding requiring transfusion or symptomatic thromboembolic events were not reported. Continuous warfarin therapy is preferred. DOAC withdrawal 1day before a procedure is associated with a high bleeding rate, which may differ for different types of anticoagulants. The continuation of antiplatelet medications in patients receiving DOACs carries a high risk of bleeding and is a future challenge.

National Statistics of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Korea.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) with a low risk of lymph node metastasis. In Korea, ESD was included in the National Health Insurance (NHI) coverage in 2011, which was expanded in 2018. In the present study, we investigated the status and trends of ESD for EGC over the past decade since its incorporation into the NHI system. We analyzed the data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database from 2011 to 2021, focusing on patient characteristics, number of ESD procedures, in-hospital length of stay (LOS), and total medical cost (TMC) per admission. In addition, we conducted an interrupted time series analysis to assess the impact of changes in insurance coverage on these variables. Overall, 95,348 cases of ESD for EGC were identified. A consistent annual increase in ESD procedures was observed, particularly in tertiary care hospitals and among patients aged >60 years. The overall median LOS and TMC were 4 days and 2,123,000 KRW, respectively. The 2018 insurance coverage expansion did not significantly affect the number of ESD procedures or LOS; however, the TMC increased significantly. Our study illustrates decade-long trends in the ESD for EGC in Korea. The policy needs to be revised continuously to optimize ESD use and improve resource allocation within healthcare systems.

Latest guideline of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer may not be suitable for Chinese patients: retrospective study findings from two centers

BackgroundTo analyze the diagnostic efficiency of the four absolute endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) indications for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of Chinese patients with early gastric cancer (EGC).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed EGC patients who underwent radical D2 gastrectomy from January 2019 to December 2022. We evaluated the rate of LNM, false-negative rate, and negative predictive value of the four ESD indications.ResultsOf enrolled 2722 EGC patients, 388 (14.3%) patients presented LNM. Tumor size > 2 cm, ulceration, submucosal invasion, undifferentiated type, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of LNM in patients with EGC. 1062 (39%) cases of EGC conformed to the four EDS indications; however, 4% of them had LNM. 451 cases were fully in accord with the fourth ESD indication (undifferentiated intramucosal carcinoma without ulceration and a maximum lesion diameter of ≤ 2 cm), and 35 of them had LNM, with a false-negative rate (FNR) of 9.02% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.24%. There was significant difference among the four indications in terms of the rate of LNM (1.0% vs 1.5% vs 1.3% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001), FNR (1.03% vs 0.52% vs 0.26% vs 9.02%, P < 0.001), and NPV (98.99% vs 98.53% vs 98.75% vs 92.24%, P < 0.001).ConclusionOverall, the fourth ESD indication was associated with a high rate of LNM compared to the other three indications. Thus, it might not be safe to classify it as an absolute indication in Chinese patients with EGC.

Nature and Determinants of Fear of Cancer Recurrence After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Gastric cancer is one of the most prevalent tumors in China and other countries, with high morbidity and mortality. Fear of cancer recurrence is common among cancer survivors. Fear of cancer recurrence experiences and psychological interventions have been investigated in breast and other cancers. However, this phenomenon and associated factors have not been evaluated in early gastric cancer survivors in China. The objective of this study was to investigate the nature of fear of cancer recurrence and influencing factors in Chinese patients with early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. This cross-sectional study in two centers included 312 early gastric cancer patients who answered self-report questionnaires and were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection between June 2022 and May 2023 to assess fear of cancer recurrence. Gender, family history of gastrointestinal tumor, tumor recurrence, Helicobacter pylori infection, disease perception, and self-perceived burden were significant factors influencing fear of cancer recurrence (p < .05). More than half of early gastric cancer patients have fear of cancer recurrence, and how to deal with it has become a key issue in the postoperative care of patients. Medical professionals should address these factors to reduce fear of cancer recurrence in at-risk patients.

Unveiling clinicopathologic features and outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer at gastric angulus in China

BackgroundWith advances in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique, an increasing number of the Chinese population are being diagnosed with early gastric cancers (EGCs) at gastric angulus. However, the relationship between gastric angulus and EGCs remains obscure.ObjectivesWe aimed to unveil the unreported location characteristics of gastric angulus in Chinese EGC patients and the correlation between the degree of submucosal fibrosis and ESD outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of EGC patients treated with ESD from January 2010 to March 2023. We retrospectively investigated and analyzed 740 EGC patients using multiple analyses.ResultsFollowing gastric antrum (53.1%), the gastric angulus (21.8%) emerged as the second-most prevalent site for EGCs. It had highest incidence of severe submucosal fibrosis and ulceration than the other parts. Multivariate analysis showed independent associations of submucosal fibrosis at the angulus with ulceration (OR: 3.714, 95% CI: 1.041–13.249), procedure duration (OR: 1.037, 95% CI: 1.014–1.061), and perforation complication (OR: 14.611, 95% CI: 1.626-131.277) (all P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe gastric angulus demonstrates the highest incidence of severe submucosal fibrosis and ulceration for EGCs identified by ESD. This condition is linked to unfavorable outcomes, typically increased perforation risks and prolonged operation duration. Therefore, meticulous dissection is crucial for patients with EGCs in the gastric angulus.

Prognostic factors for patients 85years or older undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.

Little is known about prognostic factors for patients 85years or older undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to identify such prognostic factors. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of 143 patients 85years or older undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer at a single-center between October 2005 and September 2020. Using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards regression model, we examined the relationships of patient characteristics and endoscopic curability (additional gastrectomy recommended [eCuraC-2] or not recommended) with overall survival. The median age of the patients was 86years, and most patients were men (65%). The eCuraC-2 rate was 14.7%. During the follow-up period, 55 patients died; however, only two patients died due to gastric cancer. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 91.5% and 74.7%, respectively. Male sex (hazard ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-4.30), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status of 3 (hazard ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.99), body mass index < 18.9kg/m2 (hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-4.40), and eCuraC-2 (hazard ratio, 3.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-6.75) were identified as independent prognostic factors. Moreover, patients with eCuraC-2 had significantly more poor prognostic factors than those who did not. The decision to perform endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with the aforementioned prognostic factors should be carefully considered because follow-up without endoscopic submucosal dissection is possible.

Risk factors for postoperative bleeding following endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Early gastric cancer (EGC) presents a significant challenge in surgical management, particularly concerning postoperative bleeding following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Understanding the risk factors associated with postoperative bleeding is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library without publication date restrictions. The inclusion criteria encompassed observational studies and randomized controlled trials focusing on EGC patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection and their risk factors for postoperative bleeding. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized for quality assessment. The effect size was calculated using random or fixed-effects models based on the observed heterogeneity. We assessed the heterogeneity between studies and conducted a sensitivity analysis. In our meta-analysis, 6 studies involving 4868 EGC cases were analyzed. The risk of postoperative bleeding was notably increased with intraoperative ulcer detection (odds ratio: 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-3.76, I2 = 61.0%, P = .025) and antithrombotic medication use (odds ratio: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.16-3.51, I2 = 57.2%, P = .039). Lesion resection size showed a significant mean difference (5.16, 95% CI: 2.97-7.98, P < .01), and longer intraoperative procedure time was associated with increased bleeding risk (mean difference: 11.69 minutes, 95% CI: 1.82-26.20, P < .05). Sensitivity analysis affirmed the robustness of these findings, and publication bias assessment indicated no significant bias. In EGC treatment, the risk of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding is intricately linked to factors like intraoperative ulcer detection, antithrombotic medication use, the extent of lesion resection, and the length of the surgical procedure. These interwoven risk factors necessitate careful consideration and integrated management strategies to enhance patient outcomes and safety in EGC surgeries.

Clinical outcome of non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.

Early gastric cancer (EGC) is defined as cancer cells confined to the mucosal or submucosal layer, irrespective of size or presence of lymph node metastasis. The recent EGC endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) guidelines (2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) guidelines, 2nd edition) revised the concept from "endoscopic curative/non-curative resection" (NCR) to "endoscopic curability (eCura)". Under this, eCuraA and eCuraB signify curative resections (CRs), while eCuraC (including eCuraC-1 and eCura-C2) indicate NCRs. This study retrospectively analyzes clinical and pathological data from EGC patients who underwent endoscopic resection, assessing the long-term clinical outcomes in a substantial cohort after undergoing NCR. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and pathological data from 443 EGC patients, encompassing 478 lesions, who received endoscopic treatment. The long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent NCR were statistically evaluated. Characteristics of the NCR group were compared with those of the surgical group, employing single- and multi-factor logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors that necessitate further surgical intervention. Prognostically, the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test determined the impact of risk factors on recurrence-free survival post-surgery in NCR patients. Differences were assessed using a method incorporating statistically significant differences in the multi-factor Cox regression analysis, evaluating the hazard ratio (HR) for disease recurrence following NCR. In this study, 443 EGC cases were pathologically diagnosed, comprising a total of 478 lesions. Of these, 127 cases underwent non-curative endoscopic resection, resulting in a NCR rate of 24.4%. Long-term follow-up was achieved for 117 (92.12%) patients. The metastasis/recurrence rate at 6 months stood at 23.1%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified lesion size ≥2.0 and <3 cm [P=0.02, HR =0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02-0.67], presence of ulceration (P=0.03, HR =5.48, 95% CI: 1.23-24.33), lymphatic invasion (P=0.05, HR =17.51, 95% CI: 1.07-286.23), positive vertical margins (P=0.09, HR =3.77, 95% CI: 0.81-17.53), and flat macroscopic morphology (P=0.048, HR =4.8, 95% CI: 1.01-22.73) as independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival post non-curative endoscopic resection in EGC patients. The recurrence/metastasis rate in patients who underwent NCR is notably higher compared to the control group. Significant prognostic risk factors include tumor size ≥2.0 and <3 cm, positive vertical margins, lymphatic invasion, and flat type (one of pathological gross classification). Patients in the eCuraC-2 category of NCR should consider further surgical intervention. The necessity for additional surgical intervention in these patients warrants further investigation.

Endoscopic resection and laparoscopic lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer beyond conventional endoscopic treatment indications: a 10-year outcome study.

Endoscopic full-thickness gastric resection (EFTGR) with laparoscopic regional lymph node dissection (LLND) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with LLND have been investigated as treatment options for early gastric cancer beyond the absolute indications for ESD. However, comparative studies on the long-term outcomes of these procedures are lacking. This study aimed to analyze and compare the 10-year outcomes of both procedures in a real clinical setting. Between January 2009 and December 2013, 28 and 37 patients diagnosed with EGC beyond the absolute indications for ESD were treated with EFTGR with LLND and ESD with LLND, respectively. In both procedures, the dye was injected into the tumor. However, after injection and LLND, EFTGR was performed immediately in the EFTGR with LLND group, whereas LLND was followed by ESD in the ESD with LLND group. The primary endpoint was the 10-year survival rate. The EFTGR with LLND group had one case of local recurrence (3.6%) and mortality (3.6%) each, while the ESD with LLND group had none (0.0% for both); however, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.247 for each). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in complications such as ischemia and anastomosis leakage between the groups (P = 0.247). When the procedures were properly applied, EFTGR with LLND and ESD with LLND did not increase the 10-year mortality in patients with EGC beyond the absolute ESD indications compared with conventional radical gastrectomy.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions in elderly patients.

With advancements in the development of endoscopic technologies, the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been one of the gold-standard therapies for early gastric cancer. To investigate the efficacy and safety ESD in the treatment of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions in the elderly patients. Seventy-eight elderly patients with early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University were selected and classified into two groups according to the different surgical therapies they received between January 2021 and June 2022. Among them, 39 patients treated with ESD were included in an experimental group, and 39 patients treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were included in a control group. We compared the basic intraoperative conditions, postoperative short-term recovery, long-term recovery effects and functional status of gastric mucosa between the two groups; the basic intraoperative conditions included lesion resection, intraoperative bleeding and operation time; the postoperative short-term recovery assessment indexes were length of hospital stay and incidence of surgical complications; and the long-term recovery assessment indexes were the recurrence rate at 1 year postoperatively and the survival situation at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively; and we compared the preoperative and predischarge serum pepsinogen I (PG I) and PG II levels and PG I/PG II ratio in the two groups before surgery and discharge. The curative resection rate and the rate of en bloc resection were higher in the experimental group than in the control group. The intraoperative bleeding volume was higher in the experimental group than in the control group. The operation time was longer in the experimental group than that in the control group, and the rate for base residual focus was lower in the experimental group than that of the control group, and the differences were all statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The length of hospital stay was longer in the experimental group than in the control group, and the incidence of surgical complications, 1-year postoperative recurrence rate and 3-year postoperative survival rate were lower in the experimental group than in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). However, the difference in the 1-year postoperative survival rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). Before discharge, PG I and PG I/PG II ratio were elevated in both groups compared with the preoperative period, and the above indexes were higher in the experimental group than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (both P < 0.05). Moreover, before discharge, PG II level was lower in both groups compared with the preoperative period, and the level was lower in the experimental group than in the control group, and the differences were all statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Compared with EMR, ESD surgery is more thorough. It reduces the rate of base residual focus, recurrence rate, surgical complications, and promotes the recovery of gastric cells and glandular function. It is safe and suitable for clinical application.

Characteristics and Risk Factors of Delayed Perforation in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer.

(1) Background: Delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer is a relatively uncommon and serious complication that sometimes requires emergency surgery. This study aimed to determine the clinicopathological features, risk factors, and appropriate management strategies for delayed perforation. (2) Methods: This study included 735 patients with 791 lesions who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer at a single institution between July 2009 and June 2019. We retrospectively compared the clinical features of patients with and without delayed perforations. (3) Results: The incidence of delayed perforations was 0.91%. The identified risk factors included a postoperative stomach condition and histopathological ulceration. A comparison between delayed and intraoperative perforations revealed a postoperative stomach condition as a characteristic risk factor for delayed perforation. Patients with delayed perforation who avoided emergency surgery tended to exhibit an earlier onset of symptoms such as abdominal pain and fever. No peritoneal seeding following delayed perforation was observed for any patient. (4) Conclusions: A postoperative stomach condition and histopathological ulceration were risk factors for delayed perforation. Delayed perforation is a significant complication that requires careful monitoring after gastric ESD for early gastric cancer, particularly in patients with postoperative gastric conditions.

Risk Factors for a Narrow Safety Margin after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer

Introduction: A narrow safety margin (NSM) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-recognized risk factor for local recurrence in early gastric cancer (EGC). However, only a few studies have investigated the risk factors for the development of NSM. Methods: The medical records and pathologic specimens of patients with EGC who underwent ESD from January 2020 to December 2020 at a single tertiary hospital (Daejeon, South Korea) were reviewed. Results: A total of 218 patients were enrolled and 29 had NSM (<3 mm). When comparing the NSM and the control groups, the size of the lesion, the depth of invasion, and the operating endoscopist were found to be risk factors for the development of NSM. The increased length of the subepithelial spread of the lesion was associated with a narrower safety margin. Logistic regression analysis revealed that lesion size was a risk factor for NSM, and a marginally significant difference between endoscopists was found. Conclusions: Multiple factors may need to be considered during ESD, including lesion size, invasion depth, operating endoscopist, and subepithelial spread.

The predictive value of lncRNA LAMTOR5-AS1 in the recurrence after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

Abstract Introduction Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is effective and widely used in the clinical treatment of early gastric cancer. This study revealed the predictive value of abnormal expression of lncRNA LAMTOR5-AS1 (LAMTOR5-AS1) in the recurrence of early gastric cancer patients after ESD and preliminarily explored the molecular mechanism of LAMTOR5-AS1 in gastric cancer. Materials and Methods The level of LAMTOR5-AS1 in the gastric cancer patients (n = 130) and healthy individuals (n = 130) was assessed using RT-qPCR. The ROC curve was established to characterize the diagnostic efficacy of LAMTOR5-AS1 in gastric cancer and recurrence after ESD treatment. Logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the risk factors associated with postoperative recurrence in gastric cancer patients. The regulatory effect of LAMTOR5-AS1 on gastric cancer cells was verified by CCK-8 and Transwell assay. Results LAMTOR5-AS1 was upregulated in gastric cancer tissues, and LAMTOR5-AS1 expression in the recurrence group was also enhanced. The area under the curve (AUC) of LAMTOR5-AS1 expression in differentiating gastric cancer patients from healthy controls was 0.9076, while the AUC of LAMTOR5-AS1 expression in predicting recurrence after ESD for early gastric cancer was 0.8147. LAMTOR5-AS1 was confirmed to be an independent risk factor for recurrence after ESD. Silencing of LAMTOR5-AS1 inhibited the biological activity of gastric cancer cells, which was reversed by miR-331-3p inhibitor. Conclusions LAMTOR5-AS1 was overexpressed in the recurrence group after ESD, which may be a predictive biomarker in the recurrence of EGC for early gastric cancer patients.

A gastroduodenal artery that branched from the celiac artery in gastrectomy: A rare case of an anatomical variant

AbstractUnderstanding anatomical anomalies of the branch of the celiac artery for safe gastrectomy is important. We report a case of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer with a vascular anatomical anomaly of the celiac artery. A 45‐year‐old woman was referred to our hospital because of early gastric cancer. Computed tomography showed an anatomical variation of the gastroduodenal artery, which branched from the celiac artery. The celiac artery also branched into the left gastric artery, the splenic artery, and the common hepatic artery. Preoperative understanding of an unusual branch of the celiac artery enabled a safe laparoscopic surgery. There were no postoperative complications. The Adachi classification or Michel classification is used for an anatomical anomaly of the celiac artery, but to the best of our knowledge, this case has not been previously classified and is the first reported case.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: It is time to consider the quality of its outcomes

Endoscopic resection, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is widely used as a standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer (EGC) when the risk of lymph node metastasis is negligible. Compared with surgical gastrectomy, ESD is a minimally invasive procedure with additional advantages, such as preservation of the entire stomach and maintenance of the patient’s quality of life. However, not all patients achieve curative resection after ESD of EGC. Several patients require surgical gastrectomy after ESD to achieve a curative treatment. Additional surgery after ESD, owing to non-curative resection, places considerable emotional and financial burdens on patients. Recently, as the number of endoscopists performing ESD has increased, the rate of non-curative resection after ESD has increased correspondingly. In order to decrease the non-curative resection rate, as well as determine the ideal rate of non-curative resection after ESD, it is time to consider quality indicators for the outcomes of ESD for EGC.

Animal experimental study on magnetic anchor technique-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has been transformed from an innovative technique, into a viable alternative to enteral stenting and surgical gastrointestinal anastomosis for patients with gastric outlet obstruction. Even EUS-GE guided ERCP and EUS-guided gastrointestinal anastomosis for the treatment of afferent loop syndrome have been performed, giving patients more less invasive options. However, EUS-GE is still a technically challenging procedure. In order to improve EUS-GE, several techniques have been reported to improve the technical details. With EUS-GE widely performed, more data about EUS-GE’s clinical outcomes have been reported. The aim of the current review is to describe technical details updates, clinical outcomes, and adverse events of EUS-GE.

Risk factors of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

BackgroundThe criteria for surgical intervention after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric cancer are unclear. We aimed to clarify the risk factors for residual cancer and lymph node metastasis after non-curative ESD and to identify recommendations for additional surgery.MethodsWe collected data on 133 consecutive patients who underwent additional surgery after non-curative ESD of early gastric cancer at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2013 to July 2022. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to seek risk factors of residual cancer and lymph node metastasis.ResultsThe incidence rates of residual cancer and lymph node metastasis were 13.5% (18/133) and 10.5% (14/133), respectively. There was neither residual tumor nor lymph node metastasis in 104 (78.2%) cases. Multivariate analyses elucidated that horizontal margin was an independent risk factor for local residual cancer, whereas lymphatic infiltration was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis. Patients with mixed histological types were more likely to suffer lymph node metastasis and further undergo additional surgery after non-curative ESD than pure histological type.ConclusionsAdditional gastrectomy with lymph node dissection was strongly recommended in patients with lymphatic infiltration after non-curative ESD of early gastric cancer. Patients with mixed histological type have a high propensity for lymph node metastasis and should be treated as a separate subtype.

Clinical outcomes and risk factors of non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study in Zhejiang, China.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) does not always lead to curative resection. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM)/local cancer residue after non-curative ESD for EGC have not been fully elucidated. We therefore aimed to clarify them and evaluate whether the "eCura system" is reliable for the risk stratification of LNM after non-curative ESD. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study at seven institutions in Zhejiang, China, on 128 patients who underwent non-curative ESD for EGC. We divided the patients into two groups according to their therapeutic regimen after non-curative ESD. We analyzed the risk factors for LNM, local cancer residue, cancer recurrence, and cancer-specific mortality. Furthermore, we compared the outcomes in each risk category after applying the "eCura system". Among 68 patients undergoing additional surgery, LNM was found in three (4.41%) patients, while local cancer residue was found in eight (11.76%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that upper third location and deep submucosal invasion were independent risk factors of LNM and local cancer residue. Among 60 patients who underwent simple follow-up, local cancer recurrence was found in four (6.67%) patients and cancer-specific mortality was found in one (1.67%) patient. There were no independent risk factors of cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in our study. During the follow-up period, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 93.8% and 88.9%, respectively. Additionally, LNM and cancer recurrence were significantly associated with the eCura scoring system (p = 0.044 and p = 0.017, respectively), while local cancer residue and cancer-specific mortality were not (p = 0.478 and p = 0.131, respectively). Clinicians should be aware of the risk factors for the prognosis of patients with non-curative ESD to determine subsequent treatment. Through the application of the "eCura system", additional surgery should be performed in patients with intermediate/high risk of LNM.