ABSTRACT Compensatory education policies aim to reduce the impact of inequalities on students’ engagement and performance at school. Nevertheless, this context is composed of mostly disadvantaged children who live with adversity and poverty. These difficulties are likely to be very testing for teachers’ emotions. Since the 2000s, teachers’ emotional labor has been the subject of a significant number of studies. A number of them have focused on physical education (PE), based on the idea that this school subject is particularly challenging for teachers’ emotions. However, we do not know what happens when teachers fail to regulate their emotions. Based on a situational approach to emotional labor, the present study aimed to analyze critical incidents in which teachers’ emotional deviance can be seen (i.e. when the emotions felt and expressed are at odds with the display rules). The study was conducted in collaboration with 22 PE teachers working in ‘difficult’ context. At every break in the school year, each teacher wrote about one critical incident (110 in total) and accepted to take part in an interview at the end of the year. An inductive data analysis made it possible to identify six cases of emotional deviance (5.5%), represented, in the present article, by portrait vignettes based on creative nonfiction. Each of them presents an enacted form of emotional deviance: (1) Ranting and seeking revenge on a disruptive student; (2) Exhibiting impulsive verbal violence towards a disruptive student; (3) Violently excluding a disruptive student; (4) Withdrawing and disengaging from disruptive students; (5) Involving the class as witnesses to a student’s misbehavior; (6) Breaking the rule of secularism to promote a student’s engagement. Three main highlights are therefore discussed: (1) Altercation with students is the main inducer of emotional deviance; (2) Emotional deviance results from negative emotions of varying intensity; (3) Emotional deviance takes various enacted forms as a last resort.
Read full abstract