Opioid Disposal Research Articles

Availability of Prescription Opioid Disposal Bins at U.S. Children’s Hospitals

This descriptive study examined availability of prescription opioid disposal bins at U.S. children's hospitals and assessed pharmacy-provided information on safe disposal. Only 44.2% reported a bin on site and among those without, advice varied. These findings highlight the need for improved prescription opioid disposal education and infrastructure at children's hospitals.

Evaluation of a drug deactivation system for safe disposal of opioids after ambulatory surgery

BackgroundPrescription opioids are commonly prescribed postoperatively and increase the risk of diversion or misuse when left unused and accessible. Despite awareness of the risks associated with unused opioids, harm reduction strategies like safe storage and drug take-back events may be limited by inconvenience and patient-specific barriers to access. ObjectiveTo evaluate a quality improvement project designed to facilitate at-home disposal of unused opioids after day surgery. MethodsAn observational, prospective quality improvement project was conducted in patients undergoing elective outpatient surgery at Newton-Wellesley Hospital from December 2019 to June 2020. Upon discharge, eligible patients received a Deterra drug disposal packet which deactivates unused medication. Follow-up surveys assessed packet use and reasons for nonuse 1 to 2 weeks after surgery. ResultsOne hundred six participants received a disposal packet and responded to the survey. Among the 67 respondents with unused medication, 30% used the packet. Women were more likely to use the packet than men (predicted probability 30.2% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.033), and patients aged 18–25 were more likely to use the packet than those aged 26–40 (40.0% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.049). The most common reasons for packet nonuse included procrastination, holding onto prescriptions in case of future pain, and waiting to dispose of multiple medications. ConclusionThe majority of patients surveyed had unused opioids 1 to 2 weeks after surgery, and approximately 1 in 3 patients with unused doses utilized the disposal packet. Common reasons for nonuse included procrastination and concerns about needing future medication for pain. Going forward, safe drug disposal efforts may emphasize improved patient education, partial prescription fill options, or alert systems to remind patients to safely dispose of unused medication.

Perceptions of disposal options for unused opioid analgesics among people who have been prescribed an opioid analgesic in North Carolina

ABSTRACT Background: Medication disposal programs have been promoted as one solution to the opioid crisis, but uptake by community members has been minimal. Objectives: To clarify perceptions of medication disposal options among people who have been prescribed an opioid analgesic in North Carolina to inform interventions that can facilitate the disposal of unused opioids. Methods: In 2022, we conducted focus groups with participants who received an opioid medication in the past year to gain information to develop an intervention related to the disposal of unused opioid medication (12 focus group discussions (FGDs); total N = 37; 30 identified as female, 6 as male, and 1 as another gender). Participants were shown a slide with the Food and Drug Administration’s recommended disposal options and asked about their perceptions of each option. Themes were derived using an inductive, thematic, qualitative approach. Results: Seven themes about perceptions of medication disposal programs emerged from the data. Four of the themes reflect potential barriers to medication disposal: failed disposal attempts, lack of sufficient education on proper disposal, unclear meaning of specific disposal language, and concerns about existing disposal options. Three of the themes provide insight on potential facilitators of medication disposal: preference of low-cost disposal options, ease and accessibility among disposal methods, and preferred disposal methods. Conclusion: Patients should be provided clear and consistent guidance from prescribers and dispensing pharmacists on when and how to dispose of unused medications and opportunities to dispose of medications at no cost to the patient.

Association of Opioid Disposal Practices with Parental Education and a Home Opioid Disposal Kit Following Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery.

The majority of opioid analgesics prescribed for pain after ambulatory pediatric surgery remain unused. Most parents do not dispose of these leftover opioids or dispose of them in an unsafe manner. We aimed to evaluate the association of optimal opioid disposal with a multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) initiative that proactively educated parents about the importance of optimal opioid disposal practices and provided a home opioid disposal kit before discharge after pediatric ambulatory surgery. Opioid disposal behaviors were assessed during a brief telephone interview pre- (Phase I) and post-implementation (Phase II) after surgery. For each phase, we aimed to contact the parents of 300 pediatric patients ages 0 to 17 years who were prescribed an opioid after an ambulatory surgery. The QI initiative included enhanced education and a home opioid disposal kit including DisposeRX®, a medication disposal packet that renders medications inert within a polymeric gel when mixed with water. Weighted segmented regression models evaluated the association between the QI initiative and outcomes. We considered the association between the QI initiative and outcome significant if the beta coefficient for the change in intercept between the end of Phase I and the beginning of Phase II was significant. Safe opioid disposal and any opioid disposal were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The analyzed sample contained 161 pediatric patients in Phase I and 190 pediatric patients in Phase II. Phase II (post-QI initiative) cohort compared to Phase I cohort reported higher rates of optimal (58%, n = 111/190 vs 11%, n = 18/161) and safe (66%, n = 125/190 vs 34%, n = 55/161) opioid disposal. Weighted segmented regression analyses demonstrated significant increases in the odds of optimal (odds ratio [OR], 26.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-177.0) and safe (OR, 4.4, 95% CI, 1.1-18.4) opioid disposal at the beginning of Phase II compared to the end of Phase I. The trends over time (slopes) within phases were nonsignificant and close to 0. The numbers needed to be exposed to achieve one new disposal event were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4-3.7]), 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-7.4), and 4.3 (95% CI, 1.7-13.6) for optimal, safe, and any disposal, respectively. A multidisciplinary approach to educating parents on the importance of safe disposal of leftover opioids paired with dispensing a convenient opioid disposal kit was associated with increased odds of optimal opioid disposal.

A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Opioid Disposal Instructions with Parental Education on Proper Opioid Disposal Rates Following Ambulatory Pediatric Urologic Surgery

ObjectivesTo determine if the administration of standardized opioid disposal instructions with focused parental education improves proper disposal of leftover opioid medication among families of children undergoing ambulatory urologic surgery compared to routine postoperative instructions. MethodsA prospective, double-blinded, single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in children 6-18y undergoing ambulatory urology procedures between October 2021-April 2023. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) opioid disposal best practices worksheet plus nursing parental education or routine postoperative instructions alone. All patients were prescribed acetaminophen and ibuprofen and a per-protocol rescue opioid prescription. The primary outcome was rate of proper opioid disposal at 10-14d post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included parents postoperative pain measure (PPPM) scores, numerical pain scale (NPS) scores, and weight-based opioid utilization at 48h and 10-14d. ResultsWe randomized 104 participants (53 intervention, 51 control) with 97% (101/104) complete follow-up data at 10-14d. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and analgesia use were similar between groups. We observed no significant difference in proper opioid disposal rates between arms (31% intervention vs. 18% control; estimated difference in proportion 13% [95% CI, -4–29%]; p=0.1). There was no increased odds of proper disposal of leftover opioid medication at 10-14d with the intervention compared to the control (OR 2.0 [95% CI 0.8–5.1]; p=0.1). We observed no differences in PPPM scores, NPS scores, or opioid utilization at 48h or 10-14d. ConclusionsProviding formal opioid disposal instructions with parental education did not improve proper disposal of leftover opioid medication nor did it alter post-discharge opioid utilization after pediatric urologic surgery.

Perioperative Opioid Usage Monitoring and Waste.

This editorial discusses the status and issues related to perioperative opioid usage monitoring and waste. Opioid detection of wasted material is briefly discussed also. Flowlytics® from Invistics is a digital system to monitor opioid usage and waste in medical facilities. Opioid waste in medical facilities has a two-person witness procedure. Easy to use detection of wasted materials needs to be developed in the future. It is unclear whether the strategies used in medical facilities should be recommended for opioid disposal in the public to reduce opioid diversion. Relevant studies are needed.

Storage, Disposal, and Use of Opioids Among Cancer Patients in Central China: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

Unsafe opioid-related practices can lead to abuse, diversion, and accidental overdoses. In this study, we aimed to describe the patterns and beliefs regarding the storage, disposal, and use of opioids among Chinese patients with cancer in their home settings, which remain unclear. A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted in Hubei Province from October 2022 to June 2023. We collected information on the storage, disposal, and use of opioids among cancer pain inpatients in the oncology department. Logistic regression was used to estimate the factors associated with unsafe disposal and use of opioids. The survey included 221 patients with a median age of 62 years. Only 3.2% stored their opioids under lock and key, and 49.8% were unaware of proper disposal methods. Nearly one-fifth (19.5%) reported having received information on the safe storage (14.0%) and/or disposal (10.0%) of opioids. A total of 44.3% reported unsafe use by sharing (1.8%), losing (4.1%), or taking opioids at a higher dose than prescribed (42.5%). Patients who did not receive information on the safe disposal of opioids (OR = 4.57, P = .0423), had a history of alcohol use (OR = 1.91, P = .0399), and used opioids other than morphine (OR = 2.31, P = .0461) had higher odds of unsafe disposal practices. Individuals with an associate degree/bachelor's degree or above were less likely to dispose of (OR = 0.36, P = .0261) and use (OR = 0.31, P = .0127) opioids unsafely. A significant proportion of Chinese patients with cancer exhibit unsafe practices in the storage, disposal, and use of opioids. The study highlights an urgent need for implementing routine education programs and drug "take-back" initiatives to improve opioid-related practices.

Opioid use and disposal at 2 weeks post-surgery: Brief communication regarding excess opioids and disposal habits.

To measure the number of unused prescription opioids and disposal habits of patients following orthopedic shoulder surgery. A prospective observational study. Academic orthopedic sports medicine department. Sixty-seven patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Nine-question opioid use questionnaire. Responses to an opioid use questionnaire were collected at 2 weeks post-surgery. Outcomes of interest included the amount of initial opioid prescription used and the disposal of excess opioids. Sixty-seven patients completed the opioid use questionnaire. Forty-six (68.7 percent) patients reported having excess opioids at 2 weeks. Of the 46 patients with excess opioids, 57 percent disposed of the excess, and 43 percent planned to keep their opioids. Two-thirds of the patients reported having excess opioids, highlighting the issue of an overabundance of unused prescription opioids in America. Utilization of opioid-free pain management strategies and drug disposal kits should be explored to reduce the number of unused and improperly disposed opioids.

Opioid prescription usage and disposal after provider education and SMS-based parent education

Adequate pain control after outpatient pediatric urologic surgery is important for both providers and caregivers; however, opioid pain medications are often prescribed in excess of utilization. The resultant excess opioid medication has potential to be diverted or misused. While families are instructed to dispose of leftover opioids, a significant proportion may not dispose of leftover medication. We performed a quality improvement (QI) initiative within a tertiary academic care center to examine opioid excess, opioid disposal, and whether a two-component QI intervention of provider education and family education via automated SMS messages on opioid disposal could improve excess opioid prescribing and leftover opioid disposal. Prospective parent surveys were performed on a baseline cohort of 73 patients undergoing outpatient pediatric urologic surgery between July 27 and September 4, 2020. Based on baseline data, a two-component quality improvement initiative was implemented. The first component was non-binding surgeon education regarding opioid prescribing versus opioid utilization. The second component was initiation of automated SMS messages to families after surgery with information on expected postoperative course and hyperlinked instructions for opioid disposal with GPS search for opioid disposal sites nearby. We then repeated the survey for a second cohort of patients between September 14 and October 29, 2021, including additional questions regarding SMS message utility. Of 73 patients in the baseline group, 46% were prescribed opioids (Summary Table). Of patients prescribed opioids, a median of 3 doses were used and 96% had leftover opioid medication. Seventeen percent of parents in the baseline group disposed of unused opioids prior to survey completion (1-4 weeks postop). After the intervention, 19 of 74 (26%) patients were prescribed opioids. In the group that received opioids, a median of 2 doses were used and 63% reported disposing of opioids. Ninety-six percent of parents reported satisfaction with SMS messages. Many competing priorities exist for surgical providers and parents of children undergoing outpatient pediatric urologic surgery. A passive program that delivers just-in-time information in the postoperative period has high utility for both parents and providers. Automated SMS messages and provider education about opioid utilization are associated with decreased excess opioid after outpatient pediatric urologic surgery and improved opioid disposal rates by parents. These interventions are easily implemented without significant manpower and should be considered by organizations interested in decreasing excess community opioids after outpatient pediatric urologic surgery.

Intraoperative Opioid Waste and Association of Intraoperative Opioid Dose with Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: A Hospital Registry Study.

Perioperative opioid use has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Additionally, opioid disposal carries significant costs, due to the waste of pharmaceutical products and the time needed by skilled labor to report the waste. In this study, we aimed to estimate costs and predict factors of opioid-associated intraoperative product waste, as well as to evaluate whether higher intraoperative opioid doses are associated with increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. We included 170,607 patients undergoing general anesthesia and receiving intraoperative fentanyl, hydromorphone, or morphine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, between January 2010 and June 2020. We estimated product waste-associated costs based on various opioid syringe sizes and determined predictors of opioid waste. Further, we evaluated whether higher opioid doses were associated with postoperative adverse events according to the severity-indexed, incident report-based medication error-reporting program classification. The primary outcome included post-extubation desaturation, postoperative nausea or vomiting, or postoperative somnolence or sedation. The use of the smallest syringe sizes (50 mcg for fentanyl, 0.2mg for hydromorphone, and 2mg for morphine) resulted in the lowest product waste-associated costs. The main predictor of opioid waste was the administration of more than one intraoperative opioid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.64, 95% CI 7.40-7.89, P < 0.001). Intraoperative doses of fentanyl > 50-100 mcg (aOR = 1.17 [1.10-1.25], P < 0.001, adjusted risk difference [ARD] 2%) and > 100 mcg (aOR = 1.24 [1.16-1.33], P < 0.001, ARD 3%), hydromorphone > 1mg (aOR = 1.13 [1.06-1.20], P < 0.001, ARD 2%), and morphine > 2-4mg (aOR = 1.26 [1.02-1.56], P = 0.04, ARD 3%) and > 4mg (aOR = 1.45 [1.18-1.77], P < 0.001, ARD 5%) were associated with higher risk of the primary outcome. Smaller syringe sizes of intraoperative opioids may help to reduce product waste and associated costs, as well postoperative adverse events through utilization of lower intraoperative opioid doses.

Discharge Opioid Prescription and Consumption Following Surgery: The POPCORN Observational Study.

Few studies have evaluated opioid consumption after various inpatient surgical procedures. To describe opioid prescription patterns and to characterize patient-reported use of opioids after surgery. This single-centre prospective observational study was conducted between February and October 2021 at the Jewish General Hospital in Montréal, Quebec. Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent a surgical procedure, were hospitalized for 24 hours or longer after the procedure, and had an opioid prescription at the time of discharge were included. Data were collected for the quantity of opioids prescribed, as documented in hospital records, and the quantity consumed, as reported by participants. Various potential predictors of opioid consumption were explored, and data were also collected on patients' use of non-opioid coanalgesia, scores on the Numeric Rating Scale for pain, opioid renewal requests, and proper opioid disposal during the 30-day follow-up period. A total of 150 participants completed the study. The median dose prescribed was 10 opioid pills (75.0 morphine milligram equivalents). By the end of the follow-up period, a median of 1 pill (7.5 morphine milligram equivalents) had been consumed from the total amount in the discharge prescription. Overall, 66 participants (44.0%) did not consume any of the opioids prescribed at discharge. Of the total number of pills prescribed, 58.2% (1193/2050) were unused, and 7.0% (5/71) of participants with unused pills disposed of them properly. Following discharge from hospital, postoperative patients consumed a median proportion of only 10% of prescribed opioid pills. More than half of all prescribed pills were unused. Protocols implementing specific prescribing strategies warrant further investigation to evaluate their potential impact on opioid prescription and consumption.

Evaluation of a tiered opioid prescription algorithm in an ERAS pathway: exploring opportunities for further refinement.

Opioid over-prescription is wasteful and contributes to the opioid crisis. We implemented a personalized tiered discharge opioid protocol and education on opioid disposal to minimize over-prescription. To evaluate the intervention by investigating opioid use post-discharge for women undergoing abdomino-pelvic surgery, and patient adherence to opioid disposal education. We analyzed post-discharge opioid consumption among 558 patients. Eligible patients included those who underwent elective gynecologic surgery, were not taking scheduled opioids pre-operatively, and received discharge opioids according to a tiered prescribing algorithm. A survey assessing discharge opioid consumption and disposal safety knowledge was distributed on post-discharge day 21. Over-prescription was defined as >20% of the original prescription left over. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. The survey response rate was 61% and 59% in the minimally invasive surgery and open surgery cohorts, respectively. Overall, 42.8% of patients reported using no opioids after hospital discharge, 45.2% in the minimally invasive surgery and 38.6% in the open surgery cohort. Furthermore, 74.9% of respondents were over-prescribed, with median age being statistically significant for this group (p=0.004). Finally, 46.4% of respondents expressed no knowledge regarding safe disposal practices, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p>0.99). Despite implementation of the tiered discharge opioid algorithm aimed to personalize opioid prescriptions to estimated need, we still over-prescribed opioids. Additionally, despite targeted education, nearly half of all patients who completed the survey did not know how to dispose of their opioid tablets. Additional efforts are needed to further refine the algorithm to reduce over-prescription of opioids and improve disposal education.

A Resident-Driven Quality Initiative for Reducing Opioid Prescribing in Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery Procedures, With Long-Term Follow-Up

Background The opioid epidemic has been declared a public health emergency in the United States—and major news outlets have labeled operating rooms as “unintended gateways.” In response to this emergency, our academic institution sought to decrease our contribution to the potential diversion pool—the opioids surgeons prescribe to patients which go unused. Methods Patients undergoing common surgical procedures between August 2017 and March 2018 were identified. Patients were contacted by phone and consented, and opioid use data was collected. The potential diversion pool was calculated as pills prescribed minus pills consumed for each patient and procedure, and subgroup analysis was performed to correlate the number of opioid pills taken within 24 hours before hospital discharge to the number taken after discharge. Results Surveys were completed for 357 patients. Overall, 6,831 of the 12,061 tablets prescribed were unused (57%). Patients who took 7 or more doses of oral opioids in the last 24 hours before discharge had significantly fewer (30%) pills remaining compared to patients who took 0–6 doses (68% remaining). Ninety-nine of 111 patients (89%) who took 0 tablets 24 hours prior to discharge left with an opioid prescription, creating a diversion pool of 2,419 pills remaining out of 3,353 prescribed (72%). Based on a 95% confidence interval of procedural opioid consumption, prescribing guidelines were created within a toolkit designed to set preoperative expectations, promote use of nonopioid analgesics, and provide opioid disposal information. We have continued to track our data, with low opioid prescribing patterns. Conclusion Surgical departments can develop opioid reduction toolkits aimed at reducing the potential diversion pool of opioids in our communities. Such toolkits have a sustained positive impact.

Opioid Use Following Cesarean Delivery: A Pilot Study on Patterns of Use, Storage, and Disposal.

Objective The aim of this study was to describe various aspects related to opioid use and storage in the setting of at-home pain management after cesarean deliveries among an Appalachian population. Methods Women who underwent cesarean delivery (January-June 2019) at an Appalachian institution were prospectively enrolled and administered a telephone survey seven(± 3) days post-discharge. Results Of the 87 women enrolled, 40 (46%) completed the survey; 92.5% were prescribed an opioid medication, most commonly oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg. A Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed a significant association between the severity of pain that interfered with normal daily activities and the number of pills consumed [χ2(2)=6.75, p=0.034]. More than 70% of the participants (28/40) had not safely stored or disposed of their unused opioid medications. Conclusion Our findings highlight the need for interventions to educate patients on how to appropriately use, store, and dispose of unused opioids.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Practices and Patient Opioid Utilization in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Patients.

Amid a national opioid epidemic, it is essential to review the necessity of opioid prescriptions. Research in adults has demonstrated patients often do not use their entire postoperative opioid prescription. Limited data suggest that the trend is similar in children. This study investigated the prescription volume and postoperative utilization rate of opioids among pediatric orthopaedic surgery patients at our institution. We identified pediatric patients (ages below 18y old) who presented to our institution for operating room intervention from May 24, 2021, to December 13, 2021. Patient demographics and opioid prescription volume were recorded. Parents and guardians were surveyed by paper "opioid diary" or phone interview between postoperative days 10 to 15, assessing pain level, opioid use, and plans for remaining opioid doses. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Independent t test, and Pearson correlation were used for the analysis of continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for patient demographic variables while analyzing opioid usage relationships. Prescription volume information was collected for 280 patients during the study period. We were able to collect utilization information for 102 patients (Group 1), whereas the remaining 178 patients contributed only prescription volume data (Group 2). Patients with upper extremity fractures received significantly fewer opioid doses at discharge compared with other procedure types (P=0.036). Higher BMI was positively correlated with more prescribed opioid doses (R2=0.647, P<0.001). The mean opioid utilization rate was 22.37%. A total of 50.6% of patients prescribed opioids at discharge used zero doses. A total of 96.2% of patients used opioids for 5 days or less. Most families had not disposed of excess medication by postoperative day 10. We found significant differences in opioid prescribing practices based on patient and procedure-specific variables. In addition, although our pediatric orthopaedic surgery patients had low overall rates of postoperative opioid utilization, there was significant variation in opioid use among procedure types. These results provide insights that can guide opioid prescribing practices for pediatric orthopaedic patients and promote patient education to ensure safe opioid disposal.

The development of a safe opioid use agreement for surgical care using a modified Delphi method.

Opioids prescribed to treat postsurgical pain have contributed to the ongoing opioid epidemic. While opioid prescribing practices have improved, most patients do not use all their pills and do not safely dispose of leftovers, which creates a risk for unsafe use and diversion. We aimed to generate consensus on the content of a "safe opioid use agreement" for the perioperative settings to improve patients' safe use, storage, and disposal of opioids. We conducted a modified three-round Delphi study with clinicians across surgical specialties, quality improvement (QI) experts, and patients. In Round 1, participants completed a survey rating the importance and comprehensibility of 10 items on a 5-point Likert scale and provided comments. In Round 2, a sub-sample of participants attended a focus group to discuss items with the lowest agreement. In Round 3, the survey was repeated with the updated items. Quantitative values from the Likert scale and qualitative responses were summarized. Thirty-six experts (26 clinicians, seven patients/patient advocates, and three QI experts) participated in the study. In Round 1, >75% of respondents rated at least four out of five on the importance of nine items and on the comprehensibility of six items. In Round 2, participants provided feedback on the comprehensibility, formatting, importance, and purpose of the agreement, including a desire for more specificity and patient education. In Round 3, >75% of respondents rated at least four out of five for comprehensibility and importance of all 10 updated item. The final agreement included seven items on safe use, two items on safe storage, and one item on safe disposal. The expert panel reached consensus on the importance and comprehensibility of the content for an opioid use agreement and identified additional patient education needs. The agreement should be used as a tool to supplement rather than replace existing, tailored education.

Evaluating a health system-wide opioid disposal intervention distributing home-disposal bags.

To evaluate a health system-wide intervention distributing free home-disposal bags to surgery patients prescribed opioids. We collected patient surveys and electronic medical record data at an academic health system. We conducted a prospective observational study. The bags were primarily distributed at pharmacies, though pharmacists delivered bags to some patients. The primary outcome was disposal of leftover opioids (effectiveness). Secondary outcomes were patient willingness to dispose and factors associated with disposal (effectiveness), recalling receipt of the bag (reach), and recalling receipt of bags and disposal over time (maintenance). We used a modified Poisson regression to evaluate the relative risk of disposal. Inverse probability of treatment weighting, based on propensity scores, was used to account for differences between survey responders and non-responders and reduce nonresponse bias. From August 2020 to May 2021, we surveyed patients 2 weeks after discharge (allowing for home opioid use). Eligibility criteria were age ≥18, English being primary language, valid email address, hospitalization ≤30 days, discharge home, and an opioid prescription sent to a system pharmacy. We identified 5134 patients with 2174 completing the survey (response rate 42.3%). Among respondents, 1375 (63.8%) recalled receiving the disposal bag. Among 1075 respondents with leftover opioids, 284 (26.4%) disposed, 552 (51.3%) planned to dispose, 79 (7.4%) did not plan to dispose, 69 (6.4%) had undecided, and 91 (8.5%) had not considered disposal. Recalling receipt of the bag (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.37) was positively associated with disposal. Patients who used opioids in the last year were less likely to dispose (IRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.93). Disposal rates remained stable over the study period while recalling receipt of bags trended up. A pragmatic implementation of a disposal intervention resulted in lower disposal rates than prior trials.

Naloxone co-prescriptions for surgery patients prescribed opioids: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundSurgeon-prescribed opioids contribute to 11% of prescription drug overdoses in the United States (US). With prescription opioids involved in 24% of all opioid-related overdose deaths in 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends naloxone co-prescribing to patients at high-risk of overdose and death as a harm reduction strategy. We sought to 1) examine naloxone co-prescribing rates to surgical patients (using common post-surgical prescribing amounts) and those with potential risk factors for opioid-related overdoses or adverse events, and 2) identify the factors associated with patients receiving naloxone co-prescriptions. MethodsWe conducted a single-institution, retrospective study using the electronic medical records of all patients undergoing surgery at an academic institution between August 2020 and May 2021. We included post-surgical adults prescribed opioids that were sent to a pharmacy in our health system. The primary outcome was the percentage of co-prescribed naloxone in patients prescribed opioids. ResultsThe overall naloxone co-prescription rate was low (1.7%). Only 14.6% of patients prescribed ≥350 morphine milligram equivalents (MME, equivalent to 46.7 oxycodone 5 mg tablets) and 8.6% of patients using illicit drugs were co-prescribed naloxone. On multivariable analysis, patients who were prescribed >350 MME, used illicit drugs or tobacco, underwent an elective or emergent general surgery procedure, self-identified as Hispanic, or had ASA scores of 2-4 were more likely to receive a naloxone co-prescription. ConclusionsNaloxone co-prescribing after surgery remains low, even for high-risk patients. Harm reduction strategies such as naloxone, safe storage, and disposal of leftover opioids could reduce surgeons’ iatrogenic contributions to the worsening US opioid crisis.

Disposal of Unused Postoperative Opioids: A Real-World Demonstration of Surgeon-initiated Strategies Using an Activated Charcoal Bag System.

Excessive opioid prescribing following surgery creates a reservoir of unused medications available for diversion and abuse. We conducted a cohort study examining the impact of clinic-based, surgeon-initiated strategies using an activated charcoal bag (ACB) system on disposal of unused opioids. Among patients undergoing a variety of general surgery procedures, 67% of those with unused opioids disposed of them using the ACB. Our findings demonstrate practical ways to incorporate opioid disposal into surgical practice as a complement to judicious opioid prescribing.

Piloting an opioid callback program in community pharmacies

BackgroundAlthough opioid prescribing has recently trended downward, opioid-related overdoses and deaths have drastically increased. Community pharmacists are accessible health care providers who are well positioned to disseminate information on opioid safety and to educate and counsel on medication use, managing adverse events, and proper medication disposal. Patient callbacks facilitate appropriate medication usage. We developed an opioid callback program that provides a framework for pharmacists to follow up with patients with an opioid prescription. ObjectivesThis study aimed to (1) describe the development of the opioid callback initiative and (2) report results from a pilot test in 2 community pharmacies. MethodsThe opioid callback process and data collection forms were collaboratively developed with community pharmacists at each site. Data recorded on the opioid callback forms were descriptively analyzed and chi-square test of independence explored differences by pain durations related to opioid disposal, security, and safety. Participating pharmacy staff were interviewed to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation, as well as opportunities for improvement. ResultsForty-one opioid callbacks were attempted and 36 were completed (87.8%). Pharmacists were statistically significantly more likely to discuss naloxone with patients with chronic pain (89.5%) than those with acute pain (46.2%). Pharmacists reported that the program successfully raised awareness of opioid disposal opportunities and safe opioid practices, including storage and naloxone ownership. They expressed patients’ willingness to answer questions and appreciation for the extra attention and care. ConclusionCommunity pharmacists are well positioned to address the opioid crisis as access points for medication questions, opioid safety education, opioid disposal, naloxone, and medications for people with an opioid use disorder. This study presents a proof of concept for a pharmacist-led opioid callback program. Expansion could help inform patients about how to use opioids safely, how to treat an opioid overdose, and where to dispose of unused medications.