Stent Dislodgement Research Articles

Late stent dislodgement after aggressive post-dilatations: If you cannot retrieve it, deploy it!

Late stent dislodgement after aggressive post-dilatations: If you cannot retrieve it, deploy it!

Two stents’ dislodgement in the left main coronary artery: a case report

BackgroundStent dislodgement is a life-threatening complication that can result in coronary artery embolization, stent thrombosis, acute myocardial infarction, and even death. Severely angulated, heavily calcified, and previously stented coronary arteries are associated risk factors. With the development of different lesion preparation techniques and the drug eluting stent era, the reported incidence of stent dislodgement has decreased to < 1% in the last few years.Case presentationWe report a case of a 64-year-old Moroccan man complicated during percutaneous intervention in the left main artery by the loss of two stents. This complication was successfully managed by passing the stent’s balloon into the stent and then fully expanding it. In our case, the device’s characteristics were involved and could play a role in such complications, but it is still not well understood.ConclusionsThe main treatment option is stent retrieval with different available techniques. If retrieval of the stent is impossible, crushing it against the blood vessel wall could be considered.

Retrospective evaluation of interventional radiological treatments for chronic mesenteric ischemia in Germany based on a four-year period of the DeGIR Registry: comparison of outcomes with international quality standards.

Endovascular treatment has emerged as the gold standard for managing chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) resulting from arterial stenosis or occlusion. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and complication rates of continuous interventional radiology treatment for CMI in Germany between 2018 and 2021, comparing these findings with international quality standards. Data for CMI therapy with stenting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was obtained from the quality management system of the German Interventional Radiological Society (DeGIR). A total of 3752 endovascular procedures for CMI performed from 2018 to 2021 were documented (PTA: n = 675; stenting: n = 3077). Data was analyzed for technical and clinical success rates, as well as major complication rates. Overall technical and clinical success rates for PTA and stenting procedures were 92.03 %/85.9 % and 98.76 %/96.62 %, respectively. The most common major complications were: arterial occlusion (PTA: 0.73 %; stenting: 0.63), major bleeding (PTA: 1.05 %; stenting: 0.68 %), aneurysm formation (PTA: 0.29 %; stenting: 0.72 %), stent dislodgment (PTA: 0 %; stenting: 0.06 %), and organ failure (PTA: 0.43 %; stenting: 0.96 %). Technical and clinical success rates were higher, while complication rates were lower than the corresponding threshold recommended by the Society of Interventional Radiology for the percutaneous management of chronic mesenteric ischemia. Treatment of CMI performed by interventional radiologists in Germany is safe and effective during daily and on-call shifts with results exceeding internationally accepted standards. · Treatment of CMI by interventional radiologists in Germany is effective and safe.. · The interventions are safe and effective regardless of whether they are performed during on-call shifts or the daily routine.. · The clinical and technical success rates favorably surpass the thresholds presented by SIR.. · Different major complications occurred in under 1.1 % of CMI interventions..

Dislodged Deployed DES (Drug-eluting Stent) Dismantles a Doyen—Case report

Background Left main stenting with significant stenosis in symptomatic patients is an alternative strategy of revascularization in cases of low syntax scores with high surgical risk. Stent dislodgement is a rare complication, even rarer when it is already deployed. Percutaneous retrieval of a stent when it is fully deployed, is usually not recommended as it predisposes to a higher rate of dreaded vascular complications. Case presentation A case of dislodgment of a fully deployed stent in the left main is reported here, which was successfully deployed in another vascular bed without requiring invasive surgical retrieval. Conclusions Meticulous efforts for stent sizing, landing zone, and balloon expansion are of utmost importance, especially in cases of left main stenting where the risk of systemic embolization is higher. Monitoring stent position during balloon deflation, withdrawal, or manipulation of guide catheters is critical for promptly detecting stent dislodgement. Deploying a fully dilated dislodged stent in a favorable vascular bed is an important bail-out strategy.

Risk Factors Analysis and Pathogen Distribution of Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Ureterostomy After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Postoperative urinary tract infection is a common complication that not only significantly prolongs the hospital stay and amplifies the economic burden on patients, but also affects their quality of life and prognosis. This study aimed to investigate risk factors and distribution of pathogenic bacteria in urinary tract infections among bladder cancer patients who underwent cutaneous ureterostomy following radical cystectomy. A total of 137 bladder cancer patients, who underwent cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy at our hospital from November 2018 to October 2022, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate the risk factors associated with postoperative urinary tract infection and the distribution of pathogenic bacteria among the infected patients. The results of both univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that age, proficiency in ostomy knowledge, frequency of ureteral stent tube replacement, ureteral stent tube dislodgement, urine immersion at the outer end of the ureteral stent tube, and the interval of ostomy bag replacement were independent risk factors for urinary tract infection after radical cystectomy and cutaneous ureterostomy in bladder cancer patients. A total of 55 pathogenic bacteria were isolated from 52 patients with infections. Predominantly, these were gram-negative bacteria (34 strains, 61.8%), with Proteus mirabilis having the highest proportion. Urinary tract infections after radical cystectomy and cutaneous ureterostomy predominantly involve gram-negative bacteria. This is correlated with factors such as the age of bladder cancer patients, the level of nursing education, the duration of ureteral stent tubes and ostomy bag usage, as well as issues related to impaired urine drainage.

Is Stent on a String the New Gold Standard for Postureteroscopy Ureteral Drainage? Evidence from a Systematic Review.

Introduction: Ureteral stents are widely used throughout urologic surgery, most commonly following ureteroscope (URS) procedures. This systematic review aims to assess the current evidence concerning stent on string (SOS) placed after URS and compare it with stents without strings (SWOSs). Methods: A systematic review was conducted on several databases using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology for studies in English language, for patients of all age groups, who had an SOS after URS for stone disease. Results: Of 1210 records identified, a total of 22 studies (20 adult and 2 pediatric studies) were included, with a total of 8382 patients. Of these, 3427 (40.9%) had SOSs inserted and 434 (11%) were in the pediatric age group. Our results show that SOS provides several advantages, and compared with SWOS, they were in situ for less time, with no difference in complications such as urinary tract infection or urinary symptoms. Furthermore, significant cost savings, less pain on removal, and high rates of safe home removal were reported in SOS, with >90% patients reporting that they would be happy to remove their SOSs at home. However, a small risk of stent dislodgment must be considered when making decisions regarding SOS placement after URS. Conclusion: SOS provides an excellent option after URS, especially in those patients with no intraoperative complication, and their placement is done as a routine insertion based on surgeon preference. These stents reduce dwell time, pain, cost, risks, and suffering involved from prolonged stenting, and majority of patients are happy to remove it themselves at home. Although their use seems to be still restricted in the current endourology practices, they are likely to become the new gold standard for routine URS in future, with more shared decision making and patient-reported outcome measures coming into the mainstream.

Implementing routine use of self-removed ureteric stents on extraction strings: prospective patient-reported outcome measures and complications

PurposeUreteric stents placed after ureteroscopy typically require cystoscopy for removal. Stent extraction strings allow the option of patient self-removal. This facilitates shorter stent dwell time, and cost-savings. Concerns regarding safety and limited evidence regarding patient acceptability are speculated reasons for infrequent clinical use of extraction strings. This study investigates our recent experience using routine self-removal of stents on extraction strings to provide evidence to address these concerns.MethodsIn February 2020, our hospital adopted a policy for self-removal of stents on extraction strings to be routine following ureteroscopy. This was influenced by motivation to improve service capacity for diagnostic flexible cystoscopy, hospital avoidance during the pandemic, perceived improvement for the patient experience, and cost-saving. Prospective clinical and patient-reported outcome data were collected and evaluated.ResultsThere were 168 patients who had stents on extraction strings. Mean stent dwell time was 5.2 ± 1.8 days. Primary ureteroscopy was performed in 40.5%, and 59.5% had procedures using an access sheath. Self-removal at home was successful for 79% of patients. Stent dislodgement rate was 3.0% (5/168) and retained stents due to string detachment occurred in 1.8% (3/168). Almost all indicated they “would remove the stent on string again” (90%, 128/142) and the majority reported stent removal as “very easy” (61%, 87/142). Cost modelling estimates a total saving of AUD $148,869 per annum for routine use of extraction strings at our hospital.ConclusionOur experience reflects that stent extraction strings may be used routinely with acceptable low complication rates, favourable patient experiences and associated cost savings.

Endoscopic-Directed Trans-Gastric Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Roux-en-Y gastric Bypasses: A Meta-Analysis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-directed trans-gastric retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) is a new procedure for treating pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The aim of this meta‑analysis was to determine the overall outcomes and safety of EDGE. We performed a computerized search of the main databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index, through October 2022. The main outcome measures examined in the meta-analysis were technical and clinical success rates and overall adverse event (AE) rate, especially the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) dislodgement rate. AE rates were assessed according to LAMS size (15 vs. 20mm), number of stages (single vs. two) and access route (gastrogastric vs. jejuno-gastric). Fourteen trials with a total of 574 patients who had undergone 585 EDGE procedures were included in this study. The cumulative technical and clinical success and AE rates were 98%, 94%, and 14%, respectively. The commonest AE was LAMS dislodgement (rate 4%). The overall AE rate was lower in the 20-mm LAMS than in the 15-mm LAMS group (odds ratio [OR]=5.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35 to 14.29). There were no significant differences in AE rate between number of stages (OR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.51 to 3.64) or differing access routes (OR=1.03; 95% CI 0.48 to 2.22). We here provide evidence that EDGE for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography yields good treatment outcomes in patients with RYGBs. The AE rate is significantly lower with 20-mm versus 15-mm LAMS; thus, the former is likely preferable.

Suture Stenting After Sialendoscopy: A Novel Technique That Reduces Risk of Recurrent Parotitis.

Chronic sialadenitis is associated with decreased quality of life and recurrent infections. While sialendoscopy with stenting is effective in relieving symptoms of sialadenitis, currently available stents are rigid and poorly tolerated by patients, leading to early removal and potential for adverse scarring. This study examines whether sutures can be used as a stenting material to improve patient comfort and reduce recurrence risk. This is a retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of adult patients with chronic sialadenitis undergoing sialendoscopy with or without suture stenting. Data were collected between 2014 and 2018 with a 3-year follow-up period ending in 2021. The primary outcome measure was recurrence of sialadenitis within 3 years of surgery. Secondary outcomes were stent dislodgement and patient-reported discomfort. We included 63 patients with parotid sialadenitis of whom 28 underwent suture stenting and 35 did not receive stenting after sialendoscopy. Stents were well tolerated, with a mean duration of 34.5 days, and only 2 of 28 stents (7.1%) accidentally dislodged within the first week. Suture stenting significantly reduced symptom recurrence after sialendoscopy (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.45, p = 0.003; 3-year sialadenitis recurrence rate: 7.1% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.005). Cox multivariate regression for clinicodemographic variables showed an HR of 0.04 (95% CI 0.01-0.19, p < 0.001) for the risk of symptom recurrence. Suture stenting after sialendoscopy is low cost, available across all institutions, well-tolerated by patients, and highly efficacious in reducing risk of recurrent sialadenitis after sialendoscopy. 3 Laryngoscope, 134:614-621, 2024.

Complications of PCI and its Management

Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has few complications and enhanced safety on one hand and on the other hand, available modern tools have enabled interventional cardiologists to venture into more complex patient subsets and fresh challenges in tackling the ensuing newer complications. Individual operators may take several years of experience before being exposed to the complications and hence, it is important to learn from the collective experience on the detection and management of these complications and better equipped to handle them when the need arises. The complications of PCI can be access related or coronary intervention related. The common acute coronary complications include abrupt vessel closure, thrombus, slow flow, dissection, perforation, stent dislodgement, and guidewire fracture and embolization. The chronic complications include late stent thrombosis, in-stent restenosis, and aneurysm formation. The use of imaging, physiology, and plaque modification tools are associated with specific complications which need to be kept in mind while using them. The successful management of complications needs prompt recognition, involving help from others and continued team effort and vigilance.

Abstract Number ‐ 130: Comparison of the Stents Length by Virtual Stent Simulation with the Actual Stent Length

Introduction The selection of the size of a braided stent, such as the flow diverter stent, currently depends on the surgeon’s experience. However, the suitable selection is difficult even for experienced surgeons due to shortening during the deployment. The unsuitable choice of the stent size may result in poor stent apposition or dislodgement of the stent, which may lead to inadequate treatment and increase the risk of complications. To overcome the selection problem, we developed a virtual stent simulation that virtually reproduces the stent geometry preoperatively. However, the lengths of the deployed stents in the virtual stent simulation have not been compared with those in the actual stents. In this study, we evaluated the error between the length of the virtual stent and the actual stent to investigate the clinical usefulness of the virtual stent simulation. Methods We identified 48 internal carotid artery cerebral aneurysms treated with a single flow diverter stent (PipelineTM) between October 2016 and March 2022. The vessel geometries were reconstructed from the preoperative angiographic images, and the virtual stent geometries were reproduced using virtual stent simulation with our in‐house code. The actual stent geometries were reconstructed from the postoperative angiographic images and overlaid on the preoperative vessel geometries using affine transformation. The lengths of the virtual and actual stents were measured, respectively. The differences between the lengths of the virtual and actual stents were calculated by subtracting the actual stent length from the virtual stent length. The errors between the virtual and actual stents were estimated to validate the virtual stent simulation. Results The average maximum diameter in the 48 aneurysms was 16.4±5.91 mm. The average difference in length between the virtual stents and the actual stents was +1.70 ± 4.01 mm, with the average error based on virtual stent length of +3.24 ± 11.3%. The virtual stents of 16 aneurysms were shorter than the actual stents, and the average difference in length was ‐2.97 ± 1.82 mm. On the other hand, the virtual stents of the other 32 aneurysms were longer than the actual stents, with the average difference in length of +4.04 ± 2.47 mm. One possible cause of these differences is that the actual stent may slightly change the geometry of the parent vessel due to the restoring force of the stent. Another reason is that the actual length of the stent may change slightly as the surgeon pushes and pulls the catheter during the procedure. Conclusions Comparing the lengths of virtual and actual stents, it was confirmed that there was some error between the stent length reproduced by the virtual stent simulation and the actual stent length. In particular, the virtual stents tend to be slightly longer than the actual stents. Although our virtual stent may be useful for identifying the appropriate size, it is necessary to investigate the causes of such errors and to realize virtual stent simulations with fewer errors.

Investigation of the small-balloon technique as a method for retrieving dislodged stents.

The small-balloon technique used to retrieve a dislodged coronary stent is less studied. We investigated the small-balloon technique to study the capture force and retrieval rate of dislodged proximal or distal stents. We developed a retrieval model for stent dislodgement and performed bench tests to compare proximal and distal capture. We evaluated capture force by capture site in a fixed stent dislodgement model and capture force and retrieval rate by capture site using a retrieval model of stent dislodgement. Three-dimensional (3D)-micro-computed tomography (CT) was used to scan the captured conditions of the distal (DC) and proximal (PC) groups. Stent, balloon shaft, and guiding catheter (GC) diameters were measured. Retrieval areas within GC were calculated and compared. The force was significantly lower in the PC group than in the DC group (p < 0.01). Successful retrieval was achieved in 100% and 84.8% in the PC and DC groups, respectively. The force required to retrieve the dislodged stent was significantly lower in the PC group than that in the DC group (p < 0.01). The force was significantly lower in the successful cases in the DC group than in the unsuccessful cases (p < 0.01). The retrievable areas in the PC and DC groups were 67.5% and 32.7%, respectively, as calculated from the values measured from the 3D-CT images. The success rate of PC was higher than that of DC using the small-balloon technique. The smaller proximal stent gap in the PC method facilitated the retrieval of the dislodgement stent.

Safety and efficacy of the expressman extension system for complex coronary lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Safety and efficacy of the expressman extension system for complex coronary lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention.

A Novel Retrieval Equipment for Coronary Stent Dislodgement

A Novel Retrieval Equipment for Coronary Stent Dislodgement

Stent embolization in stented segment: a diagnostic challenge.

Stent dislodgement during angioplasty is a rare but potentially fatal complication if not properly managed. We described a case of an elderly man who had previously undergone coronary angioplasty and now presented with an inferior wall myocardial infarction and required emergency angioplasty. Because of the loss of antegrade flow during the procedure, the proximal lesion was stented first. Undeployed stent was dislodged into proximal stent during distal stent deployment through proximal stent. This complication was addressed by crushing the undeployed stent and deploying another stent to secure the crushed stent to the arterial wall. Postprocedure patient was stable and discharged after 2 days. An operator should be aware of this risk as well as possible bailout options.

Abstract 12175: A Migrated External Iliac Stent - To Retrieve or Not to Retrieve

Endovascular venous stenting has become a more favorable intervention for occlusive, symptomatic deep vein thromboses (DVTs), especially given its decreased complication rate and shorter recovery time than its predecessor, open venous bypass. Risks, however, still exist and can include stent fragmentation and dislodgement causing cardiopulmonary complications. A 57-year-old man with bilateral lower extremity DVTs status post left external ilio-femoral stent and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement presented with one month of atypical chest discomfort. CT chest showed migration of his 40cm iliac stent to the IVC and right atrium. Interventional radiology visualized both a patent stent and IVC, however, attempted endovascular removal from the distal margin failed with initial retrieval of fragments only. Other fragments subsequently embolized to the pulmonary and lower lobe arteries and right ventricles. Extraction of more distal fragments was deferred due to risks of structural damage, arrhythmias, and pulmonary vasculature perforation. Fragment analysis by pathology demonstrated evidence of clot, yet cardiothoracic surgical intervention was deferred.The patient continued to experience chest pain and underwent a repeat CT chest three months later that demonstrated the stent extending from the right atrial junction to the infrahepatic IVC. Fragmented portions of the filter in the right ventricle and multiple stent fragments retained in the right upper and bilateral lower pulmonary lobes remained as prior with no evidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), pericardial effusion, or tamponade. Although rare, stent removal complications can occur with increased risk of long-term sequelae. Stent fracturing and dislodgement can result in foreign bodies showering the pulmonary vasculature and cardiac chambers, ultimately placing patients at risk for arterial perforation or dissection, pulmonary hemorrhage, intracardiac damage, tamponade, PE, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The consideration of such risks, in addition to early involvement of interdisciplinary teams and thorough risk-benefit discussions between patients and providers are essential when undergoing stent removal and related interventions.

Suturing a 20-mm lumen-apposing metal stent allows for safe same-session EUS-directed transgastric intervention in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy: a multicenter study (with video)

EUS-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI) is an established technique for the management of pancreaticobiliary pathology in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. There is an inherent risk of intraprocedural stent dislodgement, leading to perforation. The procedure is therefore often performed in 2 stages, 2 to 4 weeks apart, to allow for fistula maturation to mitigate the risk of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) dislodgment. However, some clinical indications such as cholangitis require more urgent intervention, rendering this approach impractical. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of same-session (SS)-EDGI with fixation of a 20-mm LAMS using endoscopic suturing. This was a 2-center, retrospective study of consecutive RYGB patients who underwent SS-EDGI using a sutured 20-mm LAMS between February 2018 and May 2020. Patient demographics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Thirty-seven patients (mean age, 58.1 years; 86.5% women) underwent SS-EDGI with a median follow-up of 31.8 months. The procedural intervention was ERCP in 33 patients (89.2%) and ERCP with EUS in 4 patients (10.8%). Technical success was 100%. Access was achieved through the gastrogastric fistula in 26 patients (70.3%) and the jejunogastric fistula in 11 (29.7%). The LAMS was anchored with 2 endoscopic sutures in 33 patients (89.2%) and 1 suture in 4 (10.8%). Adverse events occurred in 4 patients (10.8%; 3 postprocedural bleeding, 1 cholangitis). There were no episodes of stent dislodgement or delayed stent migration. A persistent fistula was diagnosed in 7 patients (18.9%) who underwent objective testing (n= 28, 75.7%), of which 6 were successfully closed endoscopically. Single-stage EDGI using a sutured 20-mm LAMS was associated with a high rate of technical success, low rates of adverse events, and no episodes of stent migration. Persistent fistulas, although common, were amenable to endoscopic management.

The Safety and Efficacy of an Unflanged 4F Pancreatic Stent in Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy for Patients with Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Prophylactic pancreatic stenting effectively reduces the rate and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in the precut technique; however, studies on the optimal type and duration of the stent are still lacking. This prospective study evaluated the incidence and severity of PEP and the rate of spontaneous stent dislodgement in patients undergoing transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) accompanied by prophylactic pancreatic stenting with an unflanged plastic stent (4F × 5 cm) for difficult biliary cannulation. A total of 247 patients with naïve papilla were enrolled in this study, and data were collected prospectively. In the final analysis, 170 and 61 patients were included in the standard cannulation technique and TPS groups, respectively. The incidence of PEP in the standard cannulation technique and TPS groups was 3.5% and 1.6% (p = 0.679), respectively. The technical success rate of selective biliary cannulation in the TPS group was 91.8%. The spontaneous dislodgement rate of the prophylactic plastic stent was 98.4%. In conclusion, an unflanged pancreatic stent (4F × 5 cm) placement in TPS for patients with failed standard cannulation technique is a safe and effective measure due to low adverse events and few additional endoscopic procedures for removing the pancreatic duct (PD) stent.

Stent Dislodgment and Retrieval During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

During PCI, stent entrapment and dislodgment in the coronary arteries is a rare but potentially fatal complication that can lead to emergent cardiac surgery. Percutaneous stent retrieval is an alternative way to solve this challenging complication while avoiding cardiac surgery.

Stent dislodgement force of drug-eluting coronary stents: a bench test.

Coronary stent dislodgement can cause critical complications. The dislodgement force of coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the dislodgement force and pattern of contemporary DES. Five DES designs which commonly used in clinical practice were tested. The force at which the stent dislodges relative to the balloon was measured. For the shim test, peak displacement force, defined as the first peak force that occurs during stent displacement and peak dislodgement force, defined as the peak force required to completely dislodge the stent from the delivery system, were measured. Three examples of each of the stents were tested using the shim test. The peak displacement force of Orsiro (3.1±0.8 N) was lower than that of Xience Sierra (5.8±0.5 N) [Firehawk 3.8±0.2 N, Resolute Onyx 4.5±1.5 N, Synergy 4.8±0.5 N (P=0.024)]. The peak dislodgement force was lowest in Orsiro (3.2±0.8 N) when compared to the other stents (Firehawk 6.6±0.6 N, Resolute Onyx 7.4±0.3 N, Synergy 11.8±0.4 N, Xience Sierra 11.1±1.6 N) (P<0.001); this remained significant in the multiple comparison analysis. During pullback of the stents, most stents buckled without removal. However, the whole Orsiro stent was completely removed from the delivery system. The dislodgement force of DESs differed between stent designs. The Orsiro stent was lower than that of other DES; additionally, it easily removed the whole stent from the delivery system. During the coronary intervention, operators should consider stent design and be cautious when pulling DES back in lesions with calcifications or a previously implanted stent, which are at high risk for stent dislodgement.