Disease Transmission Advisory Committee Research Articles

Donor-derived infections in the United States: Opportunities to learn from the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee's experience.

The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network focuses on issues related to the transmission of disease through organ transplantation. Providing a review of potential cases of transmission, translating aggregate data into actionable education and guidance for the transplant community, and providing input for policy development, DTAC aims to improve the safety of organ transplantation through a reduction in donor-derived transmission events. Through its nearly 20-year history, DTAC has provided education, guidance, and policy, addressed numerous emerging infections, and continuously focused on the community's understanding of risk assessment related to donor-derived transmission. By updating the DTAC mission to both decrease transmission and safely expand the donor pool with additional guidance to safely use organs previously not considered for transplantation due to transmission concerns, the Committee's role will remain critical.

1993. Donor-Derived Transmission of Candida species: 10-year Analysis from the OPTN ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC)

Abstract Background Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is lifesaving, but donor-derived infections can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Candida species are common colonizers in deceased donors managed in the intensive care environment, and transmission to the recipient through transplantation is a described phenomenon. We sought to characterize Candida transmission events in the US SOT population. Methods Cases referred to Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) between 2012 and 2022 as potential donor disease transmission events (PDDTE) were adjudicated by DTAC based on consensus definitions. We included all recipients from any donor in which ≥1 proven or probable (P/P) or possible transmission of Candida occurred. Results Forty deceased donors were identified (characteristics, Table 1). 124 SOT recipients received organs from these donors including 60 kidney, 27 liver, 15 heart, 14 lung, and 8 multivisceral or other. DTAC adjudications of recipients included 8 proven, 16 probable, 24 possible, 1 unlikely, 51 excluded, and 24 intervention without disease transmission (IWDT). Growth of Candida in culture occurred in 24 of 40 donors and 63 of 124 recipients. Recipients were frequently bacteremic and had Candida growth at site of explanted kidney (Table 2). Mycotic aneurysm, bleed or hematoma occurred in 22 SOT recipients, 10 of which were P/P. Allograft explant was performed in 14 recipients (13 kidney and 1 other), 7 of which were P/P. Within 45 days of PDDTE reports, death occurred in 17 SOT recipients (1 proven, 7 possible, 7 excluded, 1 unlikely, 1 unknown). Only 6 of the 17 recipients who died received antifungal therapy. Seven deaths occurred in the 49 mate recipients of the 24 P/P transmissions, though lack of culture results did not support escalating adjudications beyond possible. Conclusion Donor-derived Candida infections occur with significant associated morbidity, including graft loss, and mortality, especially in kidney recipients. Opportunity exists to further identify risks, improve communication across transplant centers, initiate appropriate antifungal therapy, and improve management of mycotic aneurysm due to candidiasis. Disclosures Jason D. Goldman, MD, MPH, Adaptive Biotechnologies: Collaborative services agreements|Eli Lilly: Advisor/Consultant|Eli Lilly: Grant/Research Support|Eli Lilly: Honoraria|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Karius, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Monogram Biosciences / Labcorp: Collaborative services agreements|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support Anil J. Trindade, MD, CareDx, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|CareDx, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Ricardo M. La Hoz, MD, Takeda: Advisor/Consultant Lara A. Danziger-Isakov, MD, MPH, Aicuris: Contracted Clinical Research|Ansun Biopharma: Contracted Clinical Research|Astellas: Contracted Clinical Research|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Contracted Clinical Research|Pfizer: Contracted Clinical Research|Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Contracted Clinical Research

Vigilance Data in Organ Donation and Solid Organ Transplantation in Germany: Six Years of Experience 2016-2022.

The reporting of serious adverse events (SAE) and serious adverse reactions (SAR) is an essential part of an effective vigilance and surveillance system (V&S) in organ donation and transplantation. All SAE and SAR reported to the German organ procurement organization (DSO) between 2016 and 2022 were analyzed. In case of a possible transmission of a disease to one or more recipients, an assessment of imputability was done according to the grading system of the US Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). 543 SAE and SAR cases were reported to the DSO and analyzed in detail. 53 of the 543 reports (9.8%) were proven or probable (P/P) transmissions of infectious diseases, malignancies or other diseases to 75 recipients. Infections were the most frequently reported P/P disease transmission occurrences (30/53, 57%). In case of disease transmission, the mortality of the recipients was high (17/75, 23%), especially when a malignant disease was transmitted (11/22, 50 %). Donor-Derived disease transmission is a rare event (53/8,519; 0.6 %), but when it occurs can lead to significant morbidity and mortality.

Investigation of donor-derived Strongyloides stercoralis infection in multiple solid organ transplant recipients-California, Michigan, Ohio, 2022.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention led an investigation to determine if Strongyloides infection in a right kidney recipient was an existing chronic infection, or if the infection was transmitted from an infected organ donor. Evidence regarding the organ donor and organ recipients Strongyloides testing, treatment, and risk factors were gathered and evaluated. The case classification algorithm created by the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee was utilized. The organ donor had risk factors for Strongyloides infection; the banked donor specimen, submitted for serology testing 112 days post-donor death, was positive. The right kidney recipient was negative for Strongyloides infection pretransplant. Strongyloides infection was diagnosed via small bowel and stomach biopsies. The left kidney recipient had risk factors for Strongyloides infection. Two posttransplant Strongyloides antibody tests were negative at 59 and 116 days posttransplant; repeat antibody tests returned positive at 158 and 190 days posttransplant. Examination of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid collected 110 days posttransplant from the heart recipient showed a parasite morphologically consistent with Strongyloides species. She subsequently developed complications from Strongyloides infection, including hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis. Based on the evidence from our investigation, donor-derived strongyloidiasis was suspected in one recipient and proven in two recipients. The results of this investigation support the importance of preventing donor-derived Strongyloides infections by laboratory-based serology testing of solid organ donors. Donor positive testing results would direct the monitoring and treatment of recipients to avoid severe complications.

Transplant of organs from donors with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing: A report from the organ procurement and transplantation network ad hoc disease transmission advisory committee.

Decisions to transplant organs from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donors must balance risk of donor-derived transmission events (DDTE) with the scarcity of available organs. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data were used to compare organ utilization and recipient outcomes between SARS-CoV-2 NAT+ and NAT- donors. NAT+ was defined by either a positive upper or lower respiratory tract (LRT) sample within 21 days of procurement. Potential DDTE were adjudicated by OPTN Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. From May 27, 2021 (date of OTPN policy for required LRT testing of lung donors) to January 31, 2022, organs were recovered from 617 NAT+ donors from all OPTN regions and 53 of 57 (93%) organ procurement organizations. NAT+ donors were younger and had higher organ quality scores for kidney and liver. Organ utilization was lower for NAT+ donors compared to NAT- donors. A total of 1241 organs (776 kidneys, 316 livers, 106 hearts, 22 lungs, and 21 other) were transplanted from 514 NAT+ donors compared to 21946 organs from 8853 NAT- donors. Medical urgency was lower for recipients of NAT+ liver and heart transplants. The median waitlist time was longer for liver recipients of NAT+ donors. The match run sequence number for final acceptor was higher for NAT+ donors for all organ types. Outcomes for hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 30-day graft loss were similar for all organ types. No SARS-CoV-2 DDTE occurred in this interval. Transplantation of SARS-CoV-2 NAT+ donor organs appears safe for short-term outcomes of death and graft loss and ameliorates the organ shortage. Further study is required to assure comparable longer term outcomes.

Donor-derived tuberculosis among solid organ transplant recipients in the United States-2008 to 2018.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be transmitted via organ donation and result in severe outcomes. To better understand donor-derived tuberculosis (DDTB), all potential transmissions reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. Among 51 total reports, nine (17%) (9 donors/35 recipients) had≥1 recipient with proven/probable disease transmission. Of these, eight were reported due to recipient disease, and one was reported due to a positive donor result. Proven/probable DDTB transmissions were reported in six lung and five nonlung recipients. The median time to diagnosis was 104 days posttransplant (range 0-165 days). Pulmonary TB, extrapulmonary TB, pulmonary plus extrapulmonary TB, and asymptomatic TB infection with positive interferon-gamma release assay were present in five, three, one, and two recipients, respectively. All recipients received treatment and survived except for one whose death was not attributed to TB. All donors associated with proven/probable DDTB had≥1TB risk factor. Six were born in a TB-endemic country, five had traveled to a TB-endemic country, three had been incarcerated, and three had latent TB infection. These cases highlight the importance of evaluating donors for TB based on risk factors. Early posttransplant TB in organ recipients of donors with TB risk factors requires prompt reporting to OPTN to identify other potential affected recipients and implement timely treatment interventions.

Short-term liver transplant outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 lower respiratory tract NAT positive donors.

On April 2021, the United States Organ Procurement and Transplantation Executive Committee approved the "lower respiratory SARS-CoV-2 testing for lung donors" emergency policy upon recommendation from the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. This policy requires that all lung donors be tested for SARS-CoV-2 in a lower respiratory specimen by nucleic acid test (NAT) and that the results be available before the lungs are transplanted. The overarching goal of the emergency policy was to minimize the risk of donor-derived COVID-19 to lung recipients. However, an unintended consequence of the policy was the emergence of a new population of potential donors: the SARS-CoV-2 lower respiratory tract (LRT) NAT positive donor. We describe the use of two SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive liver donors without a known history of COVID-19 infection with adequate short-term outcomes. The recipients did not have a prior history of COVID-19, nor did they receive monoclonal antibodies post-transplantation; one was unvaccinated. If the safety and long-term outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive donors are confirmed in larger studies, this strategy represents a promising way to increase the pool for organ donation.

Cryptococcus transmission through solid organ transplantation in the United States: A report from the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee.

Cryptococcus species can cause serious life-threatening infection in solid organ transplant recipients by reactivation of prior infection, posttransplant de novo infection, or donor transmission from the transplanted organ. Although previously reported in the literature, the extent of donor-derived cryptococcosis in the United States has not been documented. We analyzed potential donor-derived Cryptococcus transmission events reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) for investigation by the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). All reports between 2009 and 2019 in which transmission to recipients was designated proven or probable, or determined to be averted due to implementation of prophylaxis (intervention without disease transmission-"IWDT") were included. During 2009-2019, 58 reports of potential donor-derived cryptococcosis were submitted to DTAC. Among these reports, 12 donors were determined to have resulted in proven or probable transmission to 23/34 (67.6%) recipients. Most of these donors (10/12 [83%]) exhibited central nervous system-related symptoms prior to death and 5/23 (22%) infected recipients died. For 11 different donors, prophylaxis, most often with fluconazole, was administered to 23/35 (65.7%) recipients. Clinicians should maintain awareness of donor-derived cryptococcosis and consider prompt prophylaxis or treatment followed by reporting to OPTN for further investigation.

Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial impacts and responses of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in the United States.

COVID‐19 has been sweeping the globe, hitting the United States particularly hard with a state of emergency declared on March 13, 2020. Transplant hospitals have taken various precautions to protect patients from potential exposure. OPTN donor, candidate, and transplant data were analyzed from January 5, 2020 to September 5, 2020. The number of new waiting list registrations decreased, with the Northeast seeing over a 50% decrease from the week of 3/8 versus the week of 4/5. The national transplant system saw near cessation of living donor transplantation (−90%) from the week of 3/8 to the week of 4/5. Similarly, deceased donor kidney transplant volume dropped from 367 to 202 (−45%), and other organs saw similar decreases: lung (−70%), heart (−43%), and liver (−37%). Deceased donors recovered dropped from 260 to 163 (−45%) from 3/8 compared to 4/5, including a 67% decrease for lungs recovered. The magnitude of this decrease varied by geographic area, with the largest percent change (−67%) in the Northeast. Despite the pandemic, discard rates across organ has remained stable. Although the COVID‐19 pandemic continues to evolve, OPTN data show recent evidence of stabilization, an indication that an early recovery of the number of living and deceased donors and transplants has ensued.

Donor derived hepatitis B virus infection: Analysis of the Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be transmitted from organ donor to recipient, but details of transmission events are not widely published. The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) evaluated 105 cases of potential donor derived transmission events of HBV between 2009-2017. Proven, probable or possible transmission of HBV occurred in 25 (23.8%) cases. Recipients of liver grafts were most commonly infected (20 of 21 exposed recipients) compared to 9 of 21 exposed non-hepatic recipients. Eleven of 25 donors were HBV core antibody (HBcAb) positive/HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and infected 8/20 recipients. Of the 10 liver recipients and 1 liver-kidney recipient who received organs from these donors: six were not given antiviral prophylaxis, two developed infection after antiviral prophylaxis was discontinued, two developed HBV while on lamivudine prophylaxis, one was on antiviral prophylaxis and did not develop HBV viremia or antigenemia. One recipient of a HBcAb positive/HBsAg negative kidney developed active HBV infection. Unexpected donor-derived transmission of HBV was a rare event in reports to DTAC, but was often detected in the recipient late post-transplant. Six of 11 recipients (54.5%) of a liver from a HBcAb positive donor did not receive prophylaxis; all of these were potentially preventable with the use of anti-viral prophylaxis.

Ten years of donor-derived disease: A report of the disease transmission advisory committee.

Despite clinical and laboratory screening of potential donors for transmissible disease, unexpected transmission of disease from donor to recipient remains an inherent risk of organ transplantation. The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) was created to review and classify reports of potential disease transmission and use this information to inform national policy and improve patient safety. From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017, the DTAC received 2185 reports; 335 (15%) were classified as a proven/probable donor transmission event. Infections were transmitted most commonly (67%), followed by malignancies (29%), and other disease processes (6%). Forty-six percent of recipients receiving organs from a donor that transmitted disease to at least 1 recipient developed a donor-derived disease (DDD). Sixty-seven percent of recipients developed symptoms of DDD within 30days of transplantation, and all bacterial infections were recognized within 45days. Graft loss or death occurred in about one third of recipients with DDD, with higher rates associated with malignancy transmission and parasitic and fungal diseases. Unexpected DDD was rare, occurring in 0.18% of all transplant recipients. These findings will help focus future efforts to recognize and prevent DDD.

Safety of Donation From Brain-dead Organ Donors With Central Nervous System Tumors: Analysis of Transplantation Outcomes in Korea.

This study aims to verify the condition of recipients of solid organs from donors with central nervous system (CNS) tumors and determine the risk of disease transmission due to transplantation. Twenty-eight brain-dead organ donors with CNS tumors and 91 recipients who received solid organs from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2014 in Korea were investigated using the Korean Network of Organ Sharing data. Of the 36 recipients of organs from the 11 donors whose pathological results were not verified, 4 developed the following tumors: renal cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri, B-cell lymphoma, and colon cancer. Among 51 recipients from 17 donors with CNS tumor, no recipient had the same tumor as the donors. Six were classified as high-risk donors according to the World Health Organization classification, and 14 recipients from these donors did not develop tumor after transplantation. The remaining 11 donors were classified as low-risk donors according to the World Health Organization classification but as high-risk donors according to the Malignancy Subcommittee of the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing. Of the 37 recipients, 3 had recurring hepatocellular carcinoma with lung and bone metastases, thyroid cancer, and Kaposi's sarcoma after transplantation. The risk of disease transmission due to organ transplantation from donors with CNS tumors was very low. Thus, organ donation from such donors should be promoted actively to expand the donor range.

2697. The Impact of Universal Deceased Donor Screening on Donor-Derived Toxoplasmosis in Solid-Organ Transplant: Report of the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC)

BackgroundDonor-derived toxoplasmosis (DDT) is a severe and potentially life-threatening infection after solid-organ transplantation (SOT). Serologic testing for Toxoplasma gondii is required for all deceased donors per OPTN policy as of 4/6/17. To assess the impact of universal donor testing and the optimal approach to DDT prevention, we analyzed potential DDT cases reviewed by DTAC.MethodsAll potential Toxoplasma donor-derived transmission events adjudicated by DTAC from 2008 to 2018 were reviewed. A standardized classification algorithm was used to adjudicate each event as proven, probable, possible, unlikely, excluded or intervention without disease transmission.ResultsTwenty-eight potential DDT events were reported between 2008 and 2018. Proven or probable (p/p) DDT developed in 16 organ recipients from 15 donors. In the 9 years prior to the new testing requirement (January 2008–March 2017) 11 organ recipients from 10 donors had p/p DDT (0.13 transmissions per 1,000 donors); in the first 21 months of the new testing requirement 5 recipients from 5 donors had p/p DDT (0.27 transmissions per 1,000 donors), rate ratio 2.15; 95% CI 0.577, 6.90;P = 0.18. 10.2% of 18,328 donors tested between April 6, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were Toxoplasma IgG seropositive. Recipient pre-SOT serostatus was unknown in 4 of 5 and negative in 1 case of p/p DDT. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was either stopped at < 3 months or not used in all 5 cases. Infection was diagnosed a median of 103 days (range 42–153) post-transplant. Four of the 5 recipients died.ConclusionDDT remains a morbid infection in both heart and non-heart recipients. Despite an apparent increase in DDT reporting to DTAC, it is unlikely that the actual incidence of this donor-derived event is increasing. Rather, with universal serologic screening of deceased donors and wider access to molecular diagnostics, DDT is increasingly recognized and diagnosed. To decrease risk for illness and death related to DDT, broader pre-transplant recipient serologic testing and use of prophylaxis or monitoring for high-risk serostatus recipients (Toxoplasma D+/R−) is critical. The optimal duration of prophylaxis is uncertain at this time and warrants further study. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

88. Public Health Service (PHS) Increased-Risk Factors in Organ Donors: A Review of the OPTN Ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC)

BackgroundIn the United States, all deceased donors (DD) are evaluated for behavioral risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C (HCV) infection during the past 12 months. DD with behavioral risk factors or hemodilution are designated as PHS increased risk donors (IRD). Since 2013, the number of IRD has increased from 13.4% of DD to 27% in 2018. Despite a low residual risk of disease transmission after a negative nucleic acid test for HIV/HBV/HCV, the considerable underutilization of IRD has driven an interest in revising the PHS IRD 2013 guidelines. The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of IRD with the goal of guiding policy change and maximize organ use.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of DD during 2018. Characteristics of IRD were compared with non-IRD. A random 10% sample of IRD was selected for manual review of text narratives and donor questionnaires submitted by organ procurement organizations to determine specific PHS IRD factors. Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test and continuous variables were compared using a 2-sample t-test for independent samples.ResultsAmong 10,721 DD in 2018, 2,904 were designated IRD (27.1%) with regional variability noted (Figure). Compared with non-IRD, IRD were younger (median age 35 vs. 45 years, P < 0.001) and more often died from drug intoxication (33.2 vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001). Hemodilution was found in 6.8% of all IRD and was the only factor for IRD designation in 60% of pediatric donors <12 years old. The random sample of IRD (N = 288) was similar to IRD population for age, gender, ethnicity, cause of death, and region of recovery (table). Descriptive analysis of the random sample showed that intravenous drug use was the most common behavioral risk factor (N = 124, 43.1%), followed by incarceration (N = 108, 37.5%). Most DD met only 1 criterion (N = 179, 62%); 21% met 2 criteria; and 17% had >3 criteria.ConclusionThis study represents the most detailed description of PHS IRD factors since the adoption of the new guidelines in 2013. Understanding the prevalence of factors that lead to IRD designation will help inform future policy development, optimize safe DD use, and increase the number of transplants. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Renal cell carcinoma suspected at time of organ donation 2008-2016: A report of the OPTN ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee Registry.

All 179 reports to the OPTN of potential renal cell carcinoma (RCC) transmission from 1/1/2008 through 12/31/2016 were reviewed. Cases were divided into those with donor tumor known or suspected at time of transplant (N=147 donors), and those in which tumor was initially found after transplant (N=32). We sought to understand the risk of transplanting either the affected kidney, the contralateral kidney or non-renal organs from donors with a suspected/confirmed unilateral RCC. In the case of RCC found prior to transplant, transplantation of 21 kidneys following excision of tumor, 47 contralateral kidneys and 198 non-renal organs was performed. No cases of RCC transmission were documented in this population. An additional six cases of live donor kidney transplantation involving resection of RCC were reported, also without transmission. Six of 9 other recipients in whom the diagnosis of RCC became available after implantation underwent allograft nephrectomy and 3 received tumor resection. No recurrent RCC was documented. Given the low rate of transmission and available treatment options, consideration should be given to judicious use of organs from donors with small solitary RCC.

1733. 10 Years of DTAC Experience With Donor-Derived Cryptococcus Transmission in Solid-Organ Transplantation in the United States

BackgroundCryptococcosis is an important fungal complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT); cases occurring within 6 months posttransplant are often severe and sometimes donor derived. Morbidity can be related to delayed recognition of clinical symptoms or lack of communications among the SOT recipient centers. To better understand transmission of Cryptococcus (Crypto) and to identify opportunities for improved identification and communication, all potential donor-derived transmission events (PDDTE) of Crypto reported to OPTN/UNOS ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) over 10 years were analyzed.MethodsAll Crypto cases reported to DTAC between January 2008 and December 2017 were reviewed retrospectively as potential donor-derived transmission events (PDDTE). Likelihood of donor-derivation was adjudicated based on recipient and donor data.ResultsFourty-six cases of Crypto were reported to DTAC during this period, involving 145 SOT recipients. Of the Proven or Probable donor-derived Crypto cases (n = 9), transmission occurred in 15 recipients; 2 donors each transmitted Crypto to 3 different recipients. Of the Possible cases, 9 recipients were affected. Six recipients with PDDTE Crypto died. Eight recipients received antifungal medications that would prevent transmission of Crypto (classified as intervention without disease transmission).UNOS Region 7 had the highest number donors with 10, with 6 and 7 from Regions 2 and 3, respectively. No cases C. gattii were reported; however, most of the reports to DTAC did not discriminate between C. neoformans and C. gattii.ConclusionThis DTAC case series highlights both donor and recipient-derived cryptococcal infections and their potential to have devastating clinical impact. These data also highlight important delays in recognizing Crypto in SOT and in communicating these results to other centers when a PDDTE is possible. Transplant teams should have a high level of suspicion for Crypto in SOT, particularly in those with fever of unknown etiology, pulmonary infiltrates, headaches, and mental status changes. In the future, it may be helpful for transplant center to perform specific testing to discriminate between Cryptococcus species to understand their differential impact in SOT. Disclosures D. F. Florescu, Astellas: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. C. R. Wolfe, Merck: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.

Donor‐derived hepatitis C in the era of increasing intravenous drug use: A report of the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee

The opioid epidemic has resulted in a potential increase in donors in the testing window period for hepatitis C virus (HCV). We analyzed HCV reports to the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) between 2008 and 2016 to estimate the risk of HCV transmission. In 15 of 95 (16%) reports, at least one recipient developed proven/probable donor-derived HCV resulting in 32 infected recipients. Seven transmissions occurred during the nucleic acid testing (NAT) window period; four occurred during serological window period. The other four transmission occurred due to human error (3) and false-negative serology (1). All seronegative-exposed liver and lung recipients contracted HCV; 18/21 (86%) kidney and 3/4 (75%) heart recipients developed HCV. Four transmitting donors died of intravenous drug overdose, three in 2016 and one in 2012. Among donors with a history of intravenous drug use (IVDU), drug intoxication as a mechanism of death, or increased risk status, and negative screening HCV testing, the risk of transmission to a recipient was about 1 in 1000. The overall risk of transmitting HCV from NAT-negative donors with IVDU is low and consistent with modeling data. This information may be helpful to clinicians counseling potential recipients offered these organs.

Don’t Pass the Peanuts: Donor-Derived Nut Allergy in Lung Transplant

Nut allergy is a leading cause of fatal allergic reactions, and case reports of food allergy transfer after solid organ transplantation have been described. Potential donor-derived transmission events reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) are reviewed and classified according to disease transmission likelihood. We sought to better understand transmission of nut allergy in thoracic transplantation and to consider potential mitigation strategies.

Coccidioidomycosis Transmission Through Organ Transplantation: A Report of the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee.

Donor-derived coccidioidomycosis has caused unexpected morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. All proven or probable reports of donor-derived coccidioidomycosis to the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee between 2005 and August 2012 were reviewed. Six reports of proven or probable coccidioidomycosis were discovered. In four of six, the infection was first detected at autopsy in the recipient. In two cases it was first identified in the donor. Twenty-one recipients received organs from these six donors. Transmission occurred in 43% at a median of 30 days posttransplant with a mortality rate of 28.5%. Eleven recipients received preemptive antifungals, seven did not receive treatment, and treatment information was not reported for three recipients. Five of seven who did not receive prophylaxis/treatment died and all 11 who received early therapy survived. Six deaths occurred 14 to 55 days after transplant, with a median of 21 days. For exposed recipients, donor-derived coccidioidomycosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Evidence of infection in one recipient should prompt immediate evaluation for treatment of all other recipients from the same donor as preemptive treatment was effective. Further studies are needed to decide whether all donors from endemic areas should have routine serologic screening.

(846) - Donor Derived Disease Transmission Events in Thoracic Organ Transplantation: Data Reviewed by the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee

(846) - Donor Derived Disease Transmission Events in Thoracic Organ Transplantation: Data Reviewed by the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee