Disease-modifying Drug Treatment Research Articles

Disease Activity and Progression of Disability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Aged Over 50 With or Without Disease-Modifying Drug Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background This study aimed to clarify the need for disease-modifying drug (DMD) treatment in elderly patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) aged 50 years or older. MS is an autoimmune, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that predominantly affects young women. Various DMDs are effective in preventing relapses and slowing the progression of disability in patients with MS. Although disease activity in MS is believed to decrease with aging, a consensus on the appropriate DMD treatment for elderly patients with MS is lacking. Methodology This study included elderly patients with MS (>50 years old). We compared the occurrence of relapses, worsening of disability, and conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) between patients with DMD treatment and those without. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of these outcomes. Confounding factors were adjusted using propensity scores. Results From January 1991 to October 2022, 76 elderly patients with MS were included. The mean age at the last visit was 57.4 ± 6.3 years, with 51 patients being female. The mean age of onset of MS was 37.1 ± 10.1 years. Fifty-four patients were included in the DMD treatment group. The overall relapse rate was 38% (33% and 48% in the DMD treatment and untreated groups, respectively). No significant differences in relapse rates (p = 0.72) or in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were identified between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences in the time to first relapse within five years between the two groups. Additionally, no significant predictors of relapse were identified. Among 61 patients with relapsing-remitting MS, 25% converted to SPMS during the observation period. Logistic regression analysis showed that older age at the final visit and the presence of brainstem lesions at the age of 50 years were associated with a higher rate of transition to SPMS. Conclusions In the present study, no significant difference was found in the rate of relapse, disability progression, and conversion to SPMS between the DMD treatment and untreated groups in elderly patients with MS. Therefore, in patients without long-term relapse, no poor prognostic functional factorsor predictors of conversion to SPMS, discontinuation of DMDs may beconsidered. In addition, the presence of brainstem lesions at 50 years of age may predict the conversion to SPMS. Thus, the continuation of DMD or conversion to an appropriate DMD should be considered in patients with brainstem lesions at 50 years of age.

Corticosteroid-induced low immunoglobulin levels in multiple sclerosis - A confounding factor.

Changes in immunoglobulin (Ig) levels may occur in association with various drugs targeting immunity, including those used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). However, influence of high-dose corticosteroids (CS) is poorly described. To describe influence of disease-modifying drugs (DMD) and CS on the Ig levels. Monocentric retrospective study examining changes in Ig levels in relation with CS intake in a series of 304 consecutive MS patients (and 1204 samples) followed or hospitalized for 7 years in a single centre. Ig levels are routinely collected in MS patients followed in our centre. IgG levels were significantly lower in MS patients exposed to CS infusion during the last 24 months. IgG levels were also lower in DMD-treated patients exposed to CS. DMD-specific decrease of IgM levels was confirmed in interaction with CS. Stratification by CS exposure suggested that a decrease in Ig levels occurring during DMD treatment was strongly associated with CS infusion. The strong and persistent effect of CS on Ig levels could be a hidden variable and should be considered in further studies targeting Ig levels.

Multiple Sclerosis in Mongolia; the First Study Exploring Predictors of Disability and Depression in Mongolian MS Patients.

Mongolia is located at 45° north latitude in the center of the Asian continent, and about 80% of the territory is at 1000 m above sea level. Epidemiologically, multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been investigated in Mongolia, although there have been a few MS case reports. We investigated the characteristics of MS in Mongolia for the first time, focusing on the association between MS-related parameters and depression levels. We initiated cross-sectional analyses, using data from 27 MS patients aged 20 to 60 years in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. The patients completed a questionnaire on their lifestyles and clinical information. We classified the MS patients on the basis of disability levels using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores: 11.1% mild disability and 88.9% moderate to severe disability (median EDSS score, 5.5). We also classified the patients on the basis of depression levels using the 9-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores: 44.4% mild depression, 40.7% moderate depression, and 14.8% severe depression (mean PHQ-9's score, 9.96 ± 5.05). We used multivariate logistical regression analyses to identify predictors of EDSS or PHQ-9 scores. Disability levels were associated with vision and balance problems. Depression levels were associated with corticosteroid treatment; no patients were treated with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs). The odds ratios for disease onset age and treatment duration were associated with EDSS scores. In conclusion, MS onset age and treatment duration were independent predicting factors influencing the level of disability. Appropriate DMD treatment would lower the disability and depression levels.

Analysis of the Group of Pediatric Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Data From the Czech National Registry.

ImportanceMultiple sclerosis can also affect children. Approximately 3–10% of patients develop multiple sclerosis before the age of 16.ObjectiveThe aim of this analysis is to describe the characteristics of pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis who started their treatment with disease-modifying drugs in 2013–2020, with data obtained from the Czech National Registry of patients with multiple sclerosis.Design and SettingA method of retrospective analysis conducted with 134 pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis was used.ResultsThe findings reveal that the mean age at the date of the introduction of the first disease-modifying drugs treatment is 15.89 years, and gender does not play any role. In addition, moderate (51.6%) and mild (45.2%) relapses are predominant in these young patients. Seventy five percent of patients will not experience a confirmed progression of the expanded disability status scale within 54.7 months from starting the treatment. Furthermore, the results confirm that the first-choice treatment is interferon beta-a and glatiramer acetate, which is common for adult patients. However, some factors, such as a low efficacy or a lack of tolerance may impact on treatment discontinuation in children.ConclusionMore research should be performed on novel disease-modifying drugs for this target group.

The course of COVID-19 infection in patients with multiple sclerosis–The experience of one center based on the population of Upper Silesia

BackgroundIt is suspected that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at greater risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection due to disability and immunotherapy. The relationship between MS and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is uncertain. The aim of the study was to collect and analyze this relationship. MethodsAll MS patients of the Neurological Outpatient Clinic in Zabrze, Poland, were regularly questioned for the symptoms of COVID-19 and contact with an infected person. Patients that presented with COVID-19 symptoms or confirmed contact with an infected person were referred for the COVID-19 test. All patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 41) were included in the analysis. Medical records of the study group were analyzed. Patient condition was monitored in the outpatient clinic after recovery. In 26 subjects, additional examinations, including brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroneurography (ENG), electroencephalography (EEG), color duplex Doppler (CDD), visual evoked potentials (VEPs), brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) and psychological assessment were performed following recovery. ResultsOnly one patient required hospitalization during COVID-19 infection, whereas 87.80% of patients did not require treatment for COVID-19. In all patients, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were below 10 mg/L. In 2.44% of patients, oxygen partial pressure was below 95%. In most MS patients, the results of further examinations after COVID-19 infection were similar to those prior to infection. Psychological assessment revealed that anxiety was found in 42.31% of patients. ConclusionsA mild course of COVID-19 in MS patients seems common despite disease-modifying drug treatment and disability. Self-isolation is recommended to reduce the number of infected patients. COVID-19 infection did not worsen the course of MS in most subjects. Patients with MS may require additional psychological support during the pandemic due to their susceptibility to anxiety.

Efficacy of cladribine tablets in high disease activity patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: post hoc analysis of subgroups with and without prior disease-modifying drug treatment

Background Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with high disease activity (HDA) experience more severe disease than those without HDA. This analysis describes the efficacy of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in HDA patient subgroups that were either treated with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) prior to study entry or were treatment naïve. Methods Post hoc analysis of the 96 week Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) study compared cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg to placebo in subgroups of patients meeting the high relapse activity plus disease activity on treatment definition of HDA. Patients were categorized into either prior DMD treatment or DMD treatment-naïve subgroups. Endpoints included annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to first relapse, time to disability progression and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes. No inferential statistical analyses were conducted between subgroups. Results The DMD-naïve cohort (n = 187) was larger than the prior-DMD cohort (n = 102). In both the DMD-naïve and prior-DMD cohorts, cladribine tablets were associated with a reduction in ARR (rate ratio [RR]: 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16–0.42; p < .0001 and RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32–0.95; p = .0324, respectively). In both subgroups, cladribine tablets increased the time to relapse versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21–0.62; p = .0002 for DMD-naïve cohort and HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.24–1.02; p = .0557 for prior-DMD cohort). Significant differences were observed for all assessed disability and MRI outcomes independently of previous treatment. Conclusion Post hoc evidence suggests consistent treatment benefits of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg during the 96 week CLARITY study among HDA-RRMS patients who were either previously treated with DMDs or were treatment naïve.

Disease-Modifying Drugs and Family Planning in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Consensus Narrative Review from the Gulf Region.

Most disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) are contraindicated in pregnancy. Management of MS is especially challenging for pregnant patients, as withdrawal of DMDs leave the patient at risk of increased disease activity. We, a group of experts in MS care from countries in the Arab Gulf, present our consensus recommendations on the management of MS in these patients. Where possible, a patient planning pregnancy can be switched to a DMD considered safe in this setting. Interferon β now can be used during pregnancy, where there is a clinical need to maintain treatment, in addition to glatiramer acetate. Natalizumab (usually to 30 weeks’ gestation for patients with high disease activity at high risk of relapse and disability progression) may also be continued into pregnancy. Cladribine tablets and alemtuzumab have been hypothesised to act as immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs). These drugs provide a period of prolonged freedom from relapses for many patients, but the patient must be prepared to wait for up to 20 months from initiation of therapy before becoming pregnant. If a patient becomes pregnant while taking fingolimod, and requires continued DMD treatment, a switch to interferon β or natalizumab after a variable washout period may be prescribed, depending on the level of disease activity. Women who wish to breastfeed should be encouraged to do so, and interferon β may also be used during breastfeeding. There is a lack of data regarding the safety of using other DMDs during breastfeeding.

Cognitive function in multiple sclerosis: A long-term look on the bright side

Multiple sclerosis (MS) may lead to cognitive decline over-time. Characterize cognitive performance in MS patients with long disease duration treated with disease modifying drugs (DMD) in relation to disability and determine the prevalence of cognitive resilience. Cognitive and functional outcomes were assessed in 1010 DMD-treated MS patients at least 10 years from onset. Cognitive performance was categorized as high, moderate or low, and neurological disability was classified according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) as mild, moderate or severe. Relationship between cognitive performance and disability was examined. After a mean disease duration of 19.6 (SD = 7.7) years, low cognitive performance was observed in 23.7% (N = 239), moderate performance in 42.7% (N = 431), and 33.7% (N = 340) had high cognitive performance, meeting the definition of cognitively resilient patients. Within the group of patients with low cognitive performance, severe disability was observed in 50.6% (121/239), while in the group of patients with high cognitive performance, mild disability was observed in 64.4% (219/340). Differences between the group of patients with high cognitive performance and severe disability (4.5%) and the group of patients with low cognitive performance and mild disability (5.0%) were not accounted for by DMD treatment duration. The majority of DMD treated MS patients did not have cognitive decline that could impair their quality of life after disease of extended duration.

Initiation of first disease-modifying treatment for multiple sclerosis patients in the Czech republic from 2013 to 2016: Data from the national registry ReMuS

Background: Proper management of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires feedback from clinical practice via registries. Objective: To introduce the Czech national multiple sclerosis registry, ReMuS, and explore the availability and use of disease-modifying drugs (DMD). Methods: The analysis focused on patients who started their first DMD, either with first-line or second-line medication and was based on reimbursement criteria set by Czech regulators. Baseline information was used to predict relapses after DMD initiation and to compare patients that started DMD in different years. Results: A total of 3,328 patients started DMD treatment for MS between 2013 and 2016; 3,203 on first-line and 125 on second-line medication. The proportion of patients starting on second-line drugs increased from 1.8% in 2013 to 4.7% in 2016. The occurrence of a relapse within one year of DMD initiation was significantly related to (1) the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score immediately prior to starting DMD and (2) the number of previous relapses. Both parameters were significantly lower in patients starting in later years of the explored interval. Conclusion: Data from the ReMuS registry highlights improvements made in the management of MS in the Czech Republic. However, a relatively low percentage of patients started treatment using second-line drugs, in contrast to trends in other countries.

Drug-use patterns and severe adverse events with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study based on German claims data.

Purpose: To describe drug-use patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and to estimate the incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) of treatment.Methods: We conducted a cohort study within the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2013. MS patients on DMDs were described in terms of clinical characteristics and drug-use patterns. Next, we assessed the incidence of AEs in new users of fingolimod, natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, and IFNβ1a.Results: Among approximately 11 million insured members of German Statutory Health Insurance, the DMD-user cohort comprised 15,377 patients with MS, with a mean age of 39.6 years and 68% females. Nearly half of all DMD users had a diagnosis of depression, with prevalence ranging from 40.1% for IFNβ1a to 62.3% for immunoglobulins. The overall rate of MS relapses per patient and year was 0.34 (95% CI 0.33–0.34). During an average follow-up of 1,650 days, the majority (42.4%) of MS patients were adherent to DMD treatment (“continuous single users”), followed by patients interrupting treatment (39.5%, “interrupters”). Switch of DMD treatment (11.9%) was less frequent, and only 5.6% discontinued treatment. Treatment discontinuation was most common in users of natalizumab (7.5%) and IFNβ1b (7.0%). The most frequent SAE was hospitalization for depression, followed by any infectious disease and any malignancy. The incidence rate of all adverse events did not significantly differ across different DMDs.Conclusion: Treatment discontinuation with DMDs and treatment switch were rare. Causes of rather frequent DMD-treatment interruption have to be evaluated in further studies based on primary data collection. Active safety monitoring of new DMDs based on claims data requires large data sets to detect rare AEs and availability of up-to-date data.

Utilization Patterns of Oral Disease-Modifying Drugs in Commercially Insured Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

The approval of new oral disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), such as fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and teriflunamide, has considerably expanded treatment options for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, data describing the use of these agents in routine clinical practice are limited. To describe time trends and identify factors associated with oral DMD treatment initiation and switching among individuals with MS. Using data from a large sample of commercially insured patients, we evaluated changes over time in the proportion of MS patients who initiated treatment with an oral DMD and who switched from an injectable DMD to an oral DMD between 2009 and 2014 in the United States. We evaluated predictors of oral DMD use using conditional logistic regression in 2 groups matched on calendar time: oral DMD initiators matched to injectable DMDs initiators and oral DMD switchers matched to those who switched to a second injectable DMD. Our cohort included 7,576 individuals who initiated a DMD and 1,342 who switched DMDs, of which oral DMDs accounted for 6% and 39%, respectively. Oral DMD initiation and switching steadily increased from 5% to 16% and 35% to 84%, respectively, between 2011 and 2014, with DMF being the most commonly used agent. Of the potential predictors with clinical significance, a recent neurologist consultation (OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.20-2.15) and emergency department visit (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.01-2.01) were significantly associated with oral DMD initiation. History of depression was noted to be a potential predictor of oral DMD initiation; however, the estimate for this predictor did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.99-1.84). No clinically relevant factors measured in our data were associated with switching to an oral DMD. Oral DMDs were found to be routinely used as second-line treatment. However, we identified few factors predictive of oral DMD initiation or switching, which implies that their selection is driven by patient and/or physician preferences. This study was funded by CVS Caremark through an unrestricted research grant to Brigham and Women's Hospital. Shrank and Matlin were employees of, and shareholders in, CVS Health at the time of the study; they report no financial interests in products or services that are related to the subject of this study. Spettell is an employee of, and shareholder in, Aetna. Chitnis serves on clinical trial advisory boards for Novartis and Genzyme-Sanofi; has consulted for Bayer, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Novartis, Merck-Serono, and Genentech-Roche; and has received research support from NIH, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Peabody Foundation, Consortium for MS Centers, Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, EMD-Serono, Novartis Biogen, and Verily. Desai reports receiving a research grant from Merck for unrelated work. Gagne is principal investigator of a research grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation to the Brigham and Women's Hospital and has received grant support from Eli Lilly, all for unrelated work. He is also a consultant to Aetion and Optum. Minden reports grants from Biogen and other fees from Genentech, EMD Serano, Avanir, and Novartis, unrelated to this study. The other authors have no conflicts to report. This study was presented as a poster at the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology 32nd Annual Meeting; August 25-28, 2016; Dublin, Ireland.

Role of Family Planning in Women With Multiple Sclerosis in Switzerland: Results of the Women With Multiple Sclerosis Patient Survey.

Background: Women of child bearing age with multiple sclerosis (MS) must carefully consider treatments when planning a family, since disease modifying drugs (DMDs) are contraindicated during pregnancy.Objectives: This questionnaire-based study aimed to improve understanding of the effect of family planning on treatment decisions in female, Swiss MS patients.Methods: Female patients with MS (aged 18–55 years) participated in the 26-question survey between September 2014 and August 2015. Information captured included patient background, family planning status, treatment course, and previous pregnancies.Results: In total, 271 questionnaires distributed from 15 MS centres were returned for analysis. Of these, 250 (92.3%) participants received DMD therapy and 106 (39.1%) wanted children or were pregnant. Significantly more patients with a short-term plan to conceive within 2 years were treated with injectables (19/54) compared with those without a plan to conceive (19/108; p = 0.013). A proportionally greater number of women not planning to conceive took oral (34/108) or infusion therapies (41/108) compared with those with a short- (13/54 and 16/54, respectively) or medium-term (after 2 years or more; infusion therapy only, 14/44) plan to conceive.Conclusion: The study highlights that pregnancy remains an important yet unresolved concern in the treatment of MS patients. Nearly all women received DMD treatment, and type of DMD treatment was influenced by family planning, with significantly more women with a short-term plan to conceive using injectables.

Relapses and disease-modifying drug treatment in pregnancy and live birth in US women with MS.

ObjectiveTo evaluate relapse rates and disease-modifying drug (DMD) treatment in US women with multiple sclerosis (MS) and a live birth.MethodsThis retrospective administrative claims database study used US commercial health plan data from women with MS and a live birth from January 1, 2006, to June 30, 2015. Relapses and DMD treatment were evaluated 1-year prepregnancy, during pregnancy, during puerperium (6 weeks postpregnancy), and 1-year postpregnancy. Relapse was defined as MS-related hospitalization, emergency room visit, or outpatient visit with corticosteroid prescription within 7 days. Generalized estimating equation models for longitudinal data tested for differences between prepregnancy vs the other time periods.ResultsA total of 2,158 patients were eligible. The odds of relapse declined during pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 0.623, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.521–0.744; p < 0.0001), increased during puerperium (OR 1.710, 95% CI 1.358–2.152; p < 0.0001), and ended at a higher level during the last 3 postpartum quarters (OR 1.216, 95% CI 1.052–1.406; p = 0.0081). The proportion of women with DMD treatment was rather low overall: approximately 20% prepregnancy, bottoming to 1.9% during the second trimester, and peaking at 25.5% 9 to 12 months postpartum. DMD treatment declined significantly during pregnancy (OR 0.171, 95% CI 0.144–0.203; p < 0.0001), remained lower during puerperium (OR 0.361, 95% CI 0.312–0.418; p < 0.0001), and ended at a higher level during the last 3 postpartum quarters (OR 1.259, 95% CI 1.156–1.371; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe rate of MS relapse decreased during pregnancy, increased 6 months postpartum, and decreased 6 to 12 months postpartum. DMD treatment was uncommon in the year before pregnancy, further decreased immediately prepregnancy and during pregnancy, and increased postpartum.

Factors associated with early initiation of disease-modifying drug treatment in newly-diagnosed patients with multiple sclerosis

Objective: To examine the time to first disease-modifying drug (DMD) treatment and to identify factors associated with early DMD initiation in newly-diagnosed patients with MS.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included newly-diagnosed patients with MS from a US administrative claims database, aged 18–65 years, with a first MS diagnosis (ICD-9-CM code: 340.xx) between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2013 (index date), continuous eligibility for 12 months pre- and 24 months post-index, and initiated DMD treatment within 2 years. Time to first DMD within 24 months post-index was evaluated. A logistic regression model predicted earlier initiation of DMD treatment (within 60 days of MS diagnosis).Results: In total, 37.4% of patients initiated DMD treatment within 2 years of MS diagnosis and were included in the primary analysis (n = 7,124). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) time from MS diagnosis to first DMD was 112.6 (148.3) days (median = 51); 30.7% received first DMD in <30 days, 55.1% in <60 days, and 18.5% not until ≥180 days after diagnosis. Logistic regression found that younger age; not living in the Northeast; diagnoses of balance disorders, numbness, and optical neuritis; the absence of musculoskeletal diagnoses; and a neurologist visit or MRI within 90 days before diagnosis were associated with DMD initiation within 60 days.Conclusions: In this population of patients initiating DMD treatment within 2 years of MS diagnosis, mean time to first DMD was 112.6 days. Identifying factors associated with delayed treatment may provide better understanding of the reasons for delay, leading to improved disease management.

Erratum to: Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Impact of Disease-Modifying Drugs.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a comprehensive subjective measure of the patient's health status. Assessment of HRQoL informs on the potential advantages and disadvantages of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) beyond their effects on observer-based disability and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities. This article reviews published data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies regarding the effects of currently available DMDs on HRQoL. Data indicate that DMD treatment is associated with prevention of worsening or with improvement of HRQoL, and that, in general, second-line DMDs may have a greater impact on HRQoL than first-line DMDs. In clinical practice, monitoring of HRQoL provides clinicians with unique information regarding disease impact and potential benefits and adverse effects of DMD treatment that may not be obtained otherwise; it might also permit early detection of an unfavorable disease course. It is suggested to assess HRQoL at the time of diagnosis and before starting or switching DMD treatment. Regular HRQoL measurements contribute to a comprehensive clinical evaluation, and may help to elucidate and quantify the patient's contribution to shared decision making regarding DMD treatment. Further studies are needed to better determine the role of HRQoL assessments in daily MS care.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Impact of Disease-Modifying Drugs.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a comprehensive subjective measure of the patient’s health status. Assessment of HRQoL informs on the potential advantages and disadvantages of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) beyond their effects on observer-based disability and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities. This article reviews published data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies regarding the effects of currently available DMDs on HRQoL. Data indicate that DMD treatment is associated with prevention of worsening or with improvement of HRQoL, and that, in general, second-line DMDs may have a greater impact on HRQoL than first-line DMDs. In clinical practice, monitoring of HRQoL provides clinicians with unique information regarding disease impact and potential benefits and adverse effects of DMD treatment that may not be obtained otherwise; it might also permit early detection of an unfavorable disease course. It is suggested to assess HRQoL at the time of diagnosis and before starting or switching DMD treatment. Regular HRQoL measurements contribute to a comprehensive clinical evaluation, and may help to elucidate and quantify the patient’s contribution to shared decision making regarding DMD treatment. Further studies are needed to better determine the role of HRQoL assessments in daily MS care.

Prognostic indicators in pediatric clinically isolated syndrome.

To assess prognostic factors for a second clinical attack and a first disability-worsening event in pediatric clinically isolated syndrome (pCIS) suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. A cohort of 770 pCIS patients was followed up for at least 10 years. Cox proportional hazard models and Recursive Partitioning and Amalgamation (RECPAM) tree-regression were used to analyze data. In pCIS, female sex and a multifocal onset were risk factors for a second clinical attack (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28, 1.06-1.55; 1.42, 1.10-1.84, respectively), whereas disease-modifying drug (DMD) exposure reduced this risk (HR, 95% CI = 0.75, 0.60-0.95). After pediatric onset MS (POMS) diagnosis, age at onset younger than 15 years and DMD exposure decreased the risk of a first Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)-worsening event (HR, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.42-0.83; 0.75, 0.71-0.80, respectively), whereas the occurrence of relapse increased this risk (HR, 95% CI = 5.08, 3.46-7.46). An exploratory RECPAM analysis highlighted a significantly higher incidence of a first EDSS-worsening event in patients with multifocal or isolated spinal cord or optic neuritis involvement at onset in comparison to those with an isolated supratentorial or brainstem syndrome. A Cox regression model including RECPAM classes confirmed DMD exposure as the most protective factor against EDSS-worsening events and relapses as the most important risk factor for attaining EDSS worsening. This work represents a step forward in identifying predictors of unfavorable course in pCIS and POMS and supports a protective effect of early DMD treatment in preventing MS development and disability accumulation in this population. Ann Neurol 2017;81:729-739.

The association of timing of disease-modifying drug initiation and relapse in patients with multiple sclerosis using electronic health records

Objective: A large, US de-identified electronic health record (EHR) database (Optum-Humedica de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset) was used to evaluate whether earlier disease-modifying drug (DMD) treatment initiation was associated with improved outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS).Methods: Newly diagnosed patients from 1 January 2008 to 30 August 2014 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code: 340.xx; first MS diagnosis = index date) with healthcare activity 1 year pre- and 2 years post-index, and who initiated DMD treatment during the 2 year follow-up period, were included. Patients were categorized as Early or Late Initiators (initiated DMD treatment ≤90 or >90 days following index, respectively). Relapse was determined by the presence of an MS-related hospitalization or an outpatient encounter with MS diagnosis and corticosteroid prescription within 7 days.Results: A total of 4732 patients met the inclusion criteria: 2042 (43.2%) were Early Initiators and 2690 (56.8%) were Late Initiators. Similar baseline mean age (46.9 years for both cohorts) and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (Early Initiators: 0.3, Late Initiators: 0.32) were observed. Average time to treatment was 20.9 ± 27.6 days for Early Initiators and 346.3 ± 181.1 days for Late Initiators. A significantly higher proportion of Late Initiators (n = 609; 22.6%) had a relapse during the 2 years following MS diagnosis compared with Early Initiators (n = 403; 19.7%; p = .0158). After controlling for covariates using multivariable logistic regression, late initiation of DMD treatment was associated with greater likelihood of relapse compared with early initiation (odds ratio 1.189; 95% CI: 1.031–1.371; p = .0172).Conclusions: Later initiation of DMD treatment (i.e. >90 days after MS diagnosis) in patients with MS was associated with a greater likelihood of relapse compared with earlier initiation. Early initiation of DMD treatment following a diagnosis of MS may have an effect on long-term outcomes.

When and how disease‐modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis should be changed in daily practice

AbstractIn Japan, four classes and five kinds of disease‐modifying drugs (DMD), such as interferon‐beta (IFNβ1a and IFNβ1b), glatiramer acetate, fingolimod and natalizumab, are approved as curative treatments for multiple sclerosis. There are advantages and disadvantages of each of these DMD, and treatment guidelines for escalation and induction therapy have yet to be established. Escalation therapy starts with a first‐line DMD, and when the first‐line DMD does not provide optimal efficacy, therapy involves a step‐up to a second DMD. Induction therapy supports the early use of a highly effective second DMD for the purpose of long‐term maintenance treatment. The DMD can be separated by their treatment efficacy and long‐term safety. Because of their demonstrated long‐term safety and efficacy, the drugs of choice are first‐line DMD (IFNβ and glatiramer acetate). In addition, their long‐term administration has not been associated with malignancies, opportunistic infections, secondary immune disease or fetal toxicity. Though fingolimod and natalizumab have been shown to have high efficacy, their long‐term safety has not been established; thus, they are used as second‐line therapies. The physician sometimes has to consider switching DMD when treating multiple sclerosis patients. The reasons for changing treatment are lack of efficacy, intolerability, adverse effects, cost, pregnancy, incorrect diagnosis and disease stability. The present review provides a general introduction to the most recent findings to help practitioners determine when and how DMD treatment should be changed for multiple sclerosis.

Discontinuation of disease modifying treatments in middle aged multiple sclerosis patients. First line drugs vs natalizumab

BackgroundSeveral disease-modifying drugs (DMD) are available for the treatment of MS, and most patients with relapsing-remitting disease are currently treated. Data on when and how DMD treatment can be safely discontinued are scarce. MethodsFifteen MS patients, treated with natalizumab for >5 years without clinical and radiological signs of inflammatory disease activity, suspended treatment and were monitored with MRI examinations and clinical follow-up to determine recurrence of disease activity. This group was compared with a retrospectively analysed cohort comprising 55 MS patients treated with first-line DMDs discontinuing therapy in the time period of 1998–2015 after an analogous stable course. ResultsNatalizumab discontinuers were followed for on average 19 months, and follow-up data for 56 months were available for first-line DMD quitters. Two-thirds of natalizumab treated patients experienced recurrent inflammatory disease activity, and one third had recurrence of rebound character. In contrast, 35% of first-line DMD quitters had mild recurrent disease activity, and no one exhibited rebound. ConclusionsWithdrawal of a first-line DMD after prolonged treatment in middle-aged MS patients with stable disease appears to be relatively safe, while natalizumab withdrawal in a similar group of patients cannot be safely done without starting alternative therapy.