Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy Research Articles

The Incidence, Aetiology and Clinical Course of Serious Infections Complicating Biological and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Tropical Australia

Introduction: Patients receiving biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) for rheumatological conditions are at an increased risk of serious, potentially life-threatening, infection. However, the incidence, aetiology, and clinical course of serious infection in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs in tropical settings are incompletely defined. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving b/tsDMARDs between October 2012 and October 2021, at Cairns Hospital in tropical Australia. The incidence, aetiology, and clinical course of serious infections (those requiring admission to hospital or parenteral antibiotics) were determined. Results: 310 patients had 1468 patient years of b/tsDMARD therapy during the study period; 74/310 (24%) had 147 serious infections translating to an overall risk of 10.0 episodes of serious infection per 100 patient years. The respiratory tract (50/147, 34%) and skin (37/147, 25%) were the most frequently affected sites. A pathogen was identified in 59/147 (40%) episodes and was most commonly Staphylococcus aureus (24/147, 16%). Only 2/147 (1%) were confirmed “tropical infections”: 1 case of Burkholderia pseudomallei and 1 case of mixed B. pseudomallei and community-acquired Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Overall, 13/147 (9%) episodes of serious infection required Intensive Care Unit admission (0.9 per 100-patient years of b/tsDMARD therapy) and 4/147 (3%) died from their infection (0.3 per 100-patient years of b/tsDMARD therapy). The burden of comorbidity and co-administration of prednisone were the strongest predictors of death or a requirement for ICU admission. Conclusions: The risk of serious infection in patients taking b/tsDMARDs in tropical Australia is higher than in temperate settings, but this is not explained by an increased incidence of traditional tropical pathogens.

Association of inflammation with left ventricular mass index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease associated with cardiovascular organ damage. Purpose We explored the association of inflammatory markers with left ventricular (LV) mass index during 22 months of follow-up in patients with RA. Methods Eighty-three outpatients with RA (age 55±12 years, 71 % women) with indication for biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy were examined with echocardiography at baseline and after 22 months. LV mass was indexed for height in the allometric power of 2.7. Serum concentrations of the inflammatory markers, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA) and calprotectin were measured by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Results At baseline, 37% had hypertension, 6% diabetes, 21% obesity and 100% were using b/ts DMARDs. The inflammatory markers decreased during follow-up (all p<0.001), while the LV mass index did not change (33.1±8.1 g/m^2.7 vs. 33.5±7.3 g/m^2.7, p=0.57). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and obesity were unchanged at follow-up (p>0.05), but the percentage of patients using b/ts DMARDs had decreased to 83% (p<0.001). In multivariable analyses, higher CRP and SAA at baseline were associated with higher LV mass index at both baseline and follow-up independent of presence of obesity, hypertension, age, sex or treatment with b/ts DMARDs at follow-up (Table 1). Inflammatory markers at follow-up were not associated with LV mass index (Table 1), but use of b/ts DMARDs at follow-up were associated with lower LV mass index after adjusting for inflammatory markers, age, sex, presence of obesity and hypertension (Table 1). Conclusion Higher levels of inflammatory markers at baseline were associated with greater LV mass index in RA patients. The use of immunosuppressive treatment throughout the study period was associated with lower LV mass index at follow-up, pointing to a role of chronic inflammation in LV hypertrophy.

Incidence of Clinically Diagnosed Psoriatic Arthritis in Sweden.

Prior incidence estimates of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) vary considerably. We aimed to assess the annual incidence of clinically diagnosed PsA among adults in Sweden in 2014-2016, overall and stratified by age/sex/education/geography, and to investigate potential time trends in incidence in 2006-2018. Use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) during the 2 years after diagnosis was also examined. Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with incident clinically diagnosed PsA in Sweden were identified from the National Patient Register (NPR) and/or the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (SRQ). Population statistics, stratification variables, and DMARD information were retrieved from other nationwide registers. Incidence was estimated according to a base case (BC) definition (ie, ≥ 1 main International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnosis of PsA [L40.5/M07.0-M07.3] from rheumatology/internal medicine in NPR, or a PsA diagnosis in SRQ during the relevant year, and no prior such diagnoses) and 4 different sensitivity analysis case definitions. The mean annual incidence of clinically diagnosed PsA among adults in Sweden in 2014-2016 was estimated at 21.77 per 100,000 person-years (PYs) at risk, according to the BC definition; 17.41 per 100,000 PYs at risk after accounting for diagnostic misclassification; and 15.78 to 28.83 per 100,000 PYs at risk across all sensitivity analyses. Incidence was slightly higher in female individuals, was lower in those with higher education (aged > 12 years), and peaked during the ages of 50 to 59 years. No apparent increasing or decreasing time trend was observed in 2006-2018. Within 2 years of diagnosis, 71.03% of patients had received DMARD therapy (22.37% biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs). From 2014 to 2016, the annual incidence of clinically diagnosed PsA in the adult Swedish population was approximately 20 per 100,000 PYs at risk. Two years after diagnosis, almost three-quarters of patients had received DMARD therapy.

South African Rheumatism and Arthritis Association 2024 updated guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires early diagnosis and prompt initiation of therapy, together with lifestyle interventions, particularly smoking cessation. These guidelines recommend a treat-to-target strategy using a composite disease activity score at each visit, with frequent follow-up and escalation or switching of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy until the goal of low disease activity is achieved. A stepwise algorithm for DMARD therapy is provided. Screening for comorbidities and vaccination is advised.

South African Rheumatism and Arthritis Association 2024 guidelines for the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) target a specific pathway of the immune system, and are usually prescribed after failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. The choice of b/tsDMARD depends on the disease profile and comorbidities, patient preference, registered indications of the drugs, and risks associated with therapy. It is recommended that b/tsDMARDs for immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases are prescribed by a rheumatologist, and all patients must be included in the South African Rheumatism and Arthritis Association biologic registry. Knowledge of and vigilance for adverse events, particularly infections, associated with b/ts DMARD therapies are of paramount importance.

Leflunomide-Associated Wound Complication After Cochlear Implantation: A Case Report.

Cochlear implantation has become an increasingly common strategy for aural rehabilitation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss who no longer benefit from conventional amplification. In conjunction, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become the keystone of management in numerous autoimmune conditions. Given the increasing prevalence of both, a greater proportion of patients will undergo cochlear implantation while on immune-modulating medications. While these medications are usually well tolerated, immunosuppression may put patients a higher risk for device infections. At present, this is not extensively studied within the cochlear implant literature. We conducted a retrospective chart review and review of the literature.Results:We present the case of an 81-year-old male who experienced wound dehiscence and infection secondary to leflunomide use for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Resolution of these issues was noted with a therapeutic drug holiday, and the patient has subsequently undergone re-implantation without issue.Conclusions:The case highlights a potential CI-associated wound complication in the setting of DMARD therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of both CIs and immunosuppressive therapy, future study on the potential for interaction is warranted to identify the best management strategy in the perioperative setting.

Association of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Low-Dose Glucocorticoid Prescription in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Many guidelines recommend limiting glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but 40% of patients remain on glucocorticoids long term. We evaluated the cardiovascular risk of long-term glucocorticoid prescription by studying patients on stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Using two claims databases, we identified patients with RA on stable DMARD therapy for >180 days. Proportional hazards models with inverse-probability weights and clustering to account for multiple observations were used to estimate the effect of glucocorticoid dose on composite cardiovascular outcomes (stroke or myocardial infarction [MI]). There were 135,583 patients in Medicare and 39,272 in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM) database. Medicare and CDM patients had an incidence of 1.3 and 0.8 composite cardiovascular outcomes per 100 person-years, respectively. In the older, comorbid Medicare cohort, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes in adjusted models with predicted one-year incidence of 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%-1.6%) for ≤5 mg, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4%-1.9%) for >5 to 10 mg, and 1.8% (95% CI 1.2%-2.5%) for >10 mg versus 1.1% (95% CI 1.1%-1.2%) among patients not receiving glucocorticoids. There was no significant association among the CDM cohort. However, in the subgroup of younger patients with RA and higher cardiovascular risk, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes. Among older patients with more comorbidities and younger patients with higher cardiovascular risk with RA on stable DMARD therapy, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of MI and stroke, even at doses ≤5 mg/day. By contrast, no association was noted among younger, healthier patients with RA.

Abatacept retention and clinical effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-world setting in Taiwan.

To evaluate real-world abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan. This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥20 years who received abatacept in real-world practice. The primary endpoint was the abatacept retention rate at 24 months. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on abatacept treatment status and previous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy. Risk factors affecting abatacept retention were determined by regression analysis. A total of 212 patients were enrolled. The overall abatacept retention rate at 24 months among all patients was 59.9% (95% confidence interval 53.0%-66.6%). Patients who were ongoing users of abatacept and bDMARD-naïve had the highest retention rate (76.3%); of these, 31.6% achieved low disease activity or remission after 2 years. Previous treatment with bDMARDs was associated with an increased risk of abatacept discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.99; p = .002). The most common reasons for abatacept discontinuation were drug switch (11.3%) and loss to follow-up (6.1%). Abatacept was well-tolerated with no new safety signals. The 24-month retention rate of abatacept was 59.9%; abatacept was associated with improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting in Taiwan.

Childhood-Onset Non-Infectious Uveitis in the “Biologic Era”. Results From Spanish Multicenter Multidisciplinary Real-World Clinical Settings

ABSTRACT Objective To characterize and describe clinical experience with childhood-onset non-infectious uveitis. Study Design A multicenter retrospective multidisciplinary national web-based registry of 507 patients from 21 hospitals was analyzed. Cases were grouped as immune disease-associated (IMDu), idiopathic (IDIu) or ophthalmologically distinct. Characteristics of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated (non-HLA-B27-related) uveitis (JIAu), IDIu, and pars planitis (PP) were compared. Results IMDu (62.3%) and JIAu (51.9%) predominated in young females; and IDIu (22.7%) and PP (13.6%) in older children, without sex imbalance. Ocular complications occurred in 45.3% of cases (posterior synechiae [28%], cataracts [16%], band keratopathy [14%], ocular hypertension [11%] and cystoid macular edema [10%]) and were associated with synthetic (86%) and biologic (65%) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use. Subgroups were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with different characteristics. JIAu was typically anterior (98%), insidious (75%), in ANA-positive (69%), young females (82%) with fewer complications (31%), better visual outcomes, and later use of uveitis-effective biologics. In contrast, IDIu was characteristically anterior (87%) or panuveitic (12.1%), with acute onset (60%) and more complications at onset (59%: synechiae [31%] and cataracts [9.6%]) and less DMARD use, while PP is intermediate, and was mostly bilateral (72.5%), persistent (86.5%) and chronic (86.8%), with more complications (70%; mainly posterior segment and cataracts at last visit), impaired visual acuity at onset, and greater systemic (81.2%), subtenon (29.1%) and intravitreal (10.1%) steroid use. Conclusion Prognosis of childhood uveitis has improved in the “biologic era,” particularly in JIAu. Early referral and DMARD therapy may reduce steroid use and improve outcomes, especially in PP and IDIu.

Factors associated with change in arterial stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the JointHeart study

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) predominantly affects women and is associated with hypertension and arterial stiffness. We explored factors associated with change in arterial stiffness in patients with RA treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. Methods Seventy-seven outpatients with RA (age 55 ± 11, 69% women), with indication for treatment with biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs, were included. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation pressure (AP), augmentation index (AIx) and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were measured at baseline and after a mean of 22 months of follow-up. Results At follow-up, 83% used DMARDs and 73% had achieved remission or low disease activity. DAS28 decreased from 3.8 ± 1.3 to 2.8 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001). Mean PWV increased from 7.8 ± 1.6 m/s at baseline to 8.5 ± 1.8 m/s at follow-up (p < 0.001), while AP and AIx were stable. Increase in PWV during follow-up was associated with increase in systolic blood pressure (BP), diabetes, higher DAS28 and body mass index (BMI) at baseline, independent of achieved remission/low disease activity and use of DMARDs at follow-up. In multivariable analyses at follow-up, female sex was associated with higher AP and AIx, but with lower PWV, after adjusting for possible confounders. Conclusion In patients with RA, higher disease activity, BMI and diabetes at baseline, together with increase in office systolic BP were associated with an increase in arterial stiffness during follow-up, despite DMARD therapy. This highlights the need for management of cardiovascular risk factors in addition to reducing the inflammatory load in patients with RA to preserve arterial function.

Silajathu Rasayana in Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid Arthritis is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory arthritis and extra-articular involvement. Considering the pathophysiology, clinical features, and extra-articular manifestations it can be correlated to Vataraktha in Ayurveda. In this case, a 24-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis at the age of 15 and was under Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy for several years, complaints of pain and swelling over symmetrical joints of upper and lower limbs along with morning stiffness, and evident boutonniere deformity. She also had pain in her left hip for 4 years. Ayurvedic treatment was initiated with a primary focus on Amapachana, Shodhana, and Rasayana therapies. Patient assessment was conducted using a Visual analog scale, DAS28 score, HAQ-DI score, and Ama assessment tool on the 0th and 69th day. DAS 28 score improved from 7.73 to 3.19, and HAQ-DI score improved from 1.63 to 0.88. The visual analog scale was improved from 8 to 4. Following 69 days of treatment incorporated with Ayurvedic treatment procedures coupled with Rasayana therapy, demonstrated a notable amelioration of symptoms, an enhancement in the overall quality of life, and an improvement in laboratory parameters.

Factors determining resistance to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Our study was designed to investigate the reasons for starting the conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and the variables that impact the response to DMARD treatment in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Oligoarticular JIA patients (n = 187) were categorized into two groups: Group A consisted of patients who achieved remission with DMARD, and Group B comprised those who did not respond to DMARD therapy. DMARDs were initiated for various reasons: 68 (36.4%) due to active disease despite nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (± intra-articular corticosteroid) treatment, 59 (31.6%) due to uveitis, 49 (26.2%) due to extended oligoarticular JIA, and 11 (5.9%) due to inflammatory bowel disease. One hundred twenty-three patients (65.8%) achieved remission with DMARDs (Group A), while 64 patients (34.2%) did not respond to DMARD therapy (Group B). In Group B, patients had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as well as higher Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Disease Activity Scores-71 (JADAS-71) at diagnosis (both p < 0.001). Moreover, extended oligoarticular JIA subtype (p = 0.017) and involvement of small joints at diagnosis (p = 0.043) were more prevalent among these patients. Group A exhibited a higher frequency of antinuclear antibody positivity (p = 0.014). Elevated CRP levels (> 1.1mg/dL) (OR 1.308, 95% CI 1.203-3.574; p < 0.001) and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis (> 15.8) (OR 1.659, 95% CI 1.179-2.941; p < 0.001) were associated with DMARD resistance. Elevated CRP and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis were the main factors associated with DMARD resistance in oligoarticular JIA. Prospective long-term studies may help verify the role of these factors associated with DMARD resistance in oligoarticular JIA. Key Points • Conventional DMARDs were most commonly started due to active disease despite NSAID (± intra-articular corticosteroids). • Remission was achieved with DMARD in 65.8% of oligoarticular JIA patients. • Elevated CRP and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis were associated with DMARD resistance.

Adalimumab (ADA) in Pediatric Non-infectious Uveitis: An Observational Study.

Pediatric uveitis is a rare but sight-threatening condition. Prompt and adequate treatment is crucial to preserve vision and avoid long-term complications. In cases that are resistant to corticosteroids and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), anti-tumor necrosis (anti-TNF) biologic agents are usually added. In this study, we report our experience with adalimumab (ADA) anti-TNF use in this group of patients. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary pediatric uveitis clinic, in Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. All patients were pediatric patients (aged 2-18 years old) under follow-up during the period of six months. The patients' data were analyzed according to the diagnosis, age of onset of uveitis, systemic medications used before and concomitantly withADA, duration of uveitis before starting ADA, its effect, and time to notice the therapeutic effect in controlling inflammation. Finally, cases were reviewed for the development of anti-drug antibodies. Forty-two patients were included in the study. Idiopathic uveitis was diagnosed in 47.6% of patients and 40.5% of patients were associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Most (97.6%) of patients were using topical steroids before starting ADA and 95.2% continued using steroids after established ADA use, but systemic steroid use was reduced from 33.3% to 14.3%. The most common non-biologic DMARD used before ADA was methotrexate (MTX) (90.5%). One-third of the patients started ADA between 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis of uveitis, while this percentage dropped to 9.5% the year after diagnosis. Seventy-eight percent of patients acquired complete clinical control of inflammation on ADA use. Almost 78.6% of patients showed a full response in less than six months. In eight patients who were not controlled or were transiently controlled on ADA, three patients had positive anti-drug antibodies. In one patient, antidrug antibodies were identified after 12 years of ADA use, and in another, after 4 years. Adalimumab is an effective, well-tolerated drug in children with uveitis refractory to non-biologic DMARD therapy. DMARDs were usually used alongside ADA in this cohort and few patients had confirmed ADA antibodies.

P062 Trust performance in managing inflammatory arthritis over time in England and Wales: a latent class analysis approach

Abstract Background/Aims To evaluate trust-level performance in time to initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA), with identification of change in performance trajectories over time and investigation of trust characteristics associated with this change. Methods We included 130 trusts from the UK contributing to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) from 2018 to 2020. The primary outcome was days from referral to initiation of DMARD therapy in patients with EIA. Latent class growth mixture models were applied to identify distinct groups of trusts with similar trajectories of performance change over time. We used mixed-effects linear and multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate the association between delay in treatment and trust-level characteristics. Results The mean (SD) time to DMARD initiation was 53 (18) days, with an average 0.3-day decrease with each month over time. Four latent trajectories were identified in our cohort, with over 77% of individual trusts showing ongoing improvements in decreasing treatment waiting times. Prior to separating by latent class, time to DMARD initiation was shorter in trusts with higher rheumatology staffing, a local EIA treatment pathway and those with access to musculoskeletal ultrasound. Trusts with more nurses in the rheumatology department were less likely to be in the worse performance group (OR = 0.69 [95%CI 0.49, 0.93]). Conclusion In this cohort study, we observed a reduction in treatment waiting time over time. Trusts with better staffed and improved EIA clinical structure are likely to initiate definitive treatment earlier in patients with EIA. Disclosure Z. Yang: None. N. Arumalla: None. M.D. Russell: Honoraria; Lilly, Menarini, Galapagos. Grants/research support; NIHR. Other; Pfizer, Janssen, Biogen, and UCB. K. Bechman: Honoraria; Menarini, Galapagos. Grants/research support; NIHR,Versus Arthritis and Pfizer Global Medical Grants for Quality Improvement in Rheumatology Practice. Other; UCB. E. Alveyn: Other; UCB. S. Gallagher: None. E. Price: None. S. Norton: None. J. Galloway: Honoraria; AbbVie, Biovitrum, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi and UCB.

Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: is it time to revise the criteria?

Classification criteria have been developed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic diseases in order to gather a homogeneous patient population for clinical studies and facilitate the timely implementation of...

Risk perception, well-being, depression and anxiety in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic - results from the prospective multicenter KICK-COVID study in Germany

ObjectiveTo investigate the psychosocial burden in children and adolescents with juvenile rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsAs part of the multicentre observational KICK-COVID study linked to the National Pediatric Rheumatology Database, adolescents < 21 years and parents of children < 12 years with rheumatic diseases answered questions on perceptions of health risk (PHR) due to SARS-CoV2, stress, well-being (WHO-5) and symptoms of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7). Data were collected at routine visits from June to December 2021 and assessed for association with demographic and clinical parameters, treatment and patient-reported outcomes by multivariable regression analyses.ResultsData from 1356 individuals (69% female, 50% adolescents) were included. Median PHR on a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10) was 4 (IQR 2–6), median perceived stress was 3 (IQR 1–6). Adolescents reported a worse well-being with a significantly lower median WHO-5-score (60, IQR 40–76) than parents reported for their children < 12 years (80, IQR 68–84). Moderate to severe symptoms of depression and anxiety were reported by 14.3% and 12.3% of the adolescents, respectively. PHR was significantly higher in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, methotrexate or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy than in patients without these characteristics, whereas lower WHO-5 or higher PHQ-9 or GAD-7 scores were only associated with poorer patient-reported health status and physical functioning.ConclusionThe perception of health risk due to SARS-CoV2 infection was not paralleled by an impairment of mental health, which were, however, significantly correlated with self-rated health status and functional capacity, highlighting the importance of patient-reported outcome assessment.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), no. DRKS00027974. Registered on 27th of January 2022.

Effects of tapering conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to drug-free remission versus stable treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (ARCTIC REWIND): 3-year results from an open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial

Tapering of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to drug-free remission is an attractive treatment goal for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, although long-term effects of tapering and withdrawal remain unclear. We compared 3-year risks of flare between three conventional synthetic DMARD treatment strategies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission. In this open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-80 years with rheumatoid arthritis who had been in sustained remission for at least 1 year on stable conventional synthetic DMARD therapy. Patients from ten hospitals in Norway were randomly assigned (2:1:1) with centre stratification to receive stable conventional synthetic DMARDs, half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs, or half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs for 1 year followed by withdrawal of all conventional synthetic DMARDs. The primary endpoint of this part of the study was disease flare over 3 years, analysed as flare-free survival and risk difference in the per-protocol population with a non-inferiority margin of 20%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01881308) and is completed. Between June 17, 2013, and June 18, 2018, 160 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive stable-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs (n=80), half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs (n=42), or half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs tapering to withdrawal (n=38). Four patients did not receive the intervention and 156 patients received the allocated treatment strategy. One patient was excluded due to major protocol violation and 155 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. 104 (67%) of 156 patients were women and 52 (33%) were men. 139 patients completed 3-years follow-up without major protocol violation; 68 (87%) of 78 patients in the stable-dose group, 36 (88%) of 41 patients in the half-dose group and 35 (95%) of 37 patients in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group. During the 3-year study period, 80% (95% CI 69-88%) were flare-free in the stable-dose group, compared with 57% (41-71%) in the half-dose group and 38% (22-53%) in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group. Compared with stable-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs, the risk difference of flare was 23% (95% CI 6-41%, p=0·010) in the half-dose group and 40% (22-58%, p<0·0001) in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group, non-inferiority was therefore not shown. Adverse events were reported in 65 (83%) of 78 patients in the stable-dose group, 36 (90%) of 40 patients in the half-dose group, and 36 (97%) of 37 patients in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group. One death occurred in the stable-dose conventional synthetic DMARD group (sudden death considered unlikely related to the study medication). Two conventional synthetic DMARD tapering strategies were associated with significantly lower rates of flare-free survival compared with stable conventional synthetic DMARD treatment, and the data do not support non-inferiority. However, drug-free remission was achiveable for a significant subgroup of patients. This trial provides information on risk and benefits of different treatment strategies important for shared decision making. Research Council of Norway and South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.

Impact of DMARD treatment and systemic inflammation on all-cause mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and interstitial lung disease: a cohort study from the German RABBIT register

ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of disease activity and treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on all-cause mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and prevalent interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).MethodsPatients with RA-ILD...

Pharmacological Approaches in Rheumatoid Arthritis- An In-depth Analysis of Prescribed Medications

Inflammation, pain, swelling, and stability of the joints are some of the symptoms associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A variety of treatment options are available to manage symptoms and slow the progression of RA, despite the fact that there is no cure. This cross-sectional study, which was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala, India, aimed to evaluate medication prescribing practices and therapeutic strategies in RA patients. The study included 280 RA patients and data on demographics, medications prescribed, dosage, and mode of administration were collected. The findings revealed that disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were the cornerstone of RA treatment, with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), methotrexate (MTX), and sulfasalazine (SAAZ) being the most frequently prescribed DMARDs. Combination DMARD therapy, particularly the triple combination of HCQ + Folitrax + SAAZ, was prevalent among patients. Furthermore, the study highlighted the use of biologic DMARDs, such as rituximab and tofacitinib, albeit at a relatively lower rate due to the outpatient population’s milder disease severity. Supplement therapy, including vitamin D3 and folic acid, was commonly prescribed to address deficiencies and mitigate the side effects of medications like MTX. The prescription patterns also encompassed analgesics, anti-anxiety, and antidepressant medications to manage pain and psychological symptoms associated with RA. Steroids were administered initially to control inflammation, with a focus on minimizing long-term usage. The study underscores the complexity of RA management and the importance of individualized treatment approaches. It highlights the evolving landscape of RA therapeutics, emphasizing the need for clinicians to stay updated on emerging evidence and guidelines. Future research should focus on evaluating the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of different treatment regimens to optimize patient outcomes in RA management.

Predicting Flare in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Biologic Induced Remission, on Tapering, and on Stable Therapy.

The tapering of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b-DMARD) therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in stable remission is frequently undertaken, but specific guidance on how to successfully taper is lacking. The objective of this study is to identify predictors of flare in patients in stable b-DMARD-induced clinical remission, who did or did not follow structured b-DMARD tapering. Patients with RA receiving b-DMARD treatment who had achieved sustained remission according to a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) <2.6 for ≥6 months were offered tapering. Clinical, ultrasound (US) (total power Doppler [PD]/grayscale abnormalities), CD4+ T cell subsets, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at inclusion. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of flare (loss of DAS28-CRP remission) over 12 months. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of flare. Dichotomization into high/low-risk groups was based on 80% specificity using the area under the receiving operator curve (AUROC). Of 63 patients choosing tapering, 23 (37%) flared compared with 12 of 60 (20%) on stable treatment (P = 0.043). All patients who flared regained remission upon reinstating treatment. In the tapering group, flare was associated with lower regulatory T cell (Treg) (P < 0.0001) and higher CRP levels (P < 0.0001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P < 0.035), and inflammation-related cells (IRCs) (P = 0.054); stepwise modeling selected Tregs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.350, P = 0.004), IRCs (OR=1.871, P = 0.007), and CRP level (OR=1.577, P = 0.004) with 81.7% accuracy and AUROC=0.890. In the continued therapy group, modeling retained the tender joint count, total PD, and visual analog scale pain score, with 82.1% accuracy and AUROC=0.899. Most patients in the study were considered low risk of flare (80 of 123 patients [65%]). Only 5 of 37 (13.5%) of the low-risk patients who tapered flared, which was notable compared with the continued therapy group (20% flare). Flare on tapering b-DMARDs was predicted by lower Tregs and elevated inflammation biomarkers (IRCs/CRP level); flare on continued b-DMARDs was associated with raised pain parameters and US inflammation. Knowledge of these biomarkers should improve outcomes by targeted selection for tapering, and by increased monitoring of those on continued therapy predicted to flare.