Discriminative Stimulus Effects Of Methamphetamine Research Articles

The neuropharmacological properties of α-pyrrolidinobutiothiophenone, a new synthetic cathinone, in rodents; role of the dopaminergic system.

α-Pyrrolidinobutiothiophenone (α-PBT) is a chemical derivative of cathinone, a structural analogue of amphetamine. Until now, there have been a few previous neurochemical or neurobehavioural studies on the abuse potential of α-PBT. We examined the abuse potential of α-PBT by measuring psychomotor, rewarding, and reinforcing properties and methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects in rodents using locomotor activity, conditioned place preference, self-administration, and drug discrimination studies. To clarify the underlying neuropharmacological mechanisms, we measured dopamine levels and neuronal activation in the dorsal striatum. In addition, we investigated the role of the dopamine D1 receptor or D2 receptors in α-PBT-induced hyperlocomotor activity, conditioned place preference, and the methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effect of α-PBT in rodents. α-PBT promoted hyperlocomotor activity in mice. α-PBT induced drug-paired place preference in mice and supported self-administration in rats. In a drug discrimination experiment, α-PBT fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats. Furthermore, α-PBT increased dopamine levels and c-Fos expression in the dorsal striatum of mice, which was associated with these behaviours. Finally, pretreatment with the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 or the D2 receptors antagonist eticlopride significantly attenuated acute or repeated α-PBT-induced hyperlocomotor activity, place preference, and the methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects in rodents. These findings suggest that α-PBT has abuse potential at the highest dose tested via enhanced dopaminergic transmission in the dorsal striatum of rodents. The results provide scientific evidence for the legal restrictions of the recreational use of α-PBT.

Comparison of locomotor stimulant and drug discrimination effects of four synthetic cathinones to commonly abused psychostimulants.

The underground market is constantly flooded with newer synthetic as alternatives to the older cathinones. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has identified four cathinone compounds of particular concern: 3,4-methylenedioxy-alpha-pyrrolidinohexanophenone (3,4-MD-α-PHP), 4-chloro-α-pyrrolidinopropiophenone (4-Cl-α-PPP), alpha-pyrrolidinoisohexiophenone (α-PiHP) and 4-chloro-pentedrone (4-Cl-pentedrone). The current study aimed to evaluate the behavioral pharmacology of four synthetic cathinones. 3,4-MD-α-PHP, 4-Cl-α-PPP, α-PiHP, and 4-CPD were tested for locomotor activity in mice and in a drug discrimination assay with rats trained to discriminate either methamphetamine or cocaine. Locomotor stimulant effects of 3,4-MD-α-PHP ((effective dose) ED50 = 1.98 mg/kg), α-PiHP (ED50 = 2.46 mg/kg), and 4-Cl-α-PPP (ED50 = 7.18 mg/kg) were observed within 10 min following injection and lasted from 2 to 3.5 h. The stimulant action of 4-CPD (ED50 = 17.24 mg/kg) was delayed, occurring 40-70 min following injection. The maximal motor stimulant actions of 3,4-MD-α-PHP and α-PiHP 1 were equivalent to that of cocaine and methamphetamine, whereas 4-CPD (50% of cocaine) and 4-Cl-α-PPP (73% of cocaine) were less efficacious. All of the test compounds fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, 3,4-MD-α-PHP (ED50 = 2.28 mg/kg), α-PiHP (ED50 = 3.84 mg/kg), and 4-Cl-α-PPP (ED50 = 15.56 mg/kg). Only 3,4-MD-α-PHP (ED50 = 1.65 mg/kg), α-PiHP (ED50 = 1.87 mg/kg), and 4-Cl-α-PPP (ED50 = 9.79 mg/kg) fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. 4-Cl-pentedrone caused 55-70% methamphetamine-appropriate responding at doses that also suppressed responding and produced convulsions. These data indicate that 3,4-MD-α-PHP, α-PiHP, and 4-Cl-α-PPP have a potential for abuse similar to that of methamphetamine and cocaine. In contrast, 4-Cl-pentedrone may not be popular for recreational use due to its convulsant effects.

Behavioral effects of four novel synthetic cathinone analogs in rodents.

A new generation of novel cathinone compounds has been developed as stimulant substitutes to avoid drug control laws and detection of use by blood tests. Dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, 4-chloroethcathinone (4-CEC), and 4'-methyl-α-pyrrolidinohexiophenone (MPHP) were tested for in vivo psychostimulant-like effects to assess their abuse liability. Locomotor activity was assessed in an open-field assay using Swiss-Webster mice to screen for locomotor stimulant effects and to identify behaviorally-active dose ranges, times of peak effect, and durations of action. Discriminative stimulus effects were assessed in separate groups of Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate cocaine or methamphetamine from vehicle. Dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, 4-CEC, and MPHP dose-dependently increased locomotor activity. Dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, and MPHP produced maximal stimulant effects similar to cocaine and methamphetamine. 4-CEC was less efficacious, producing peak stimulant effects of about 74% of that of methamphetamine. The compounds were less potent than methamphetamine and approximately equipotent with cocaine. The doses of cocaine, methamphetamine, dipentylone, and 4-CEC that produced peak effects lasted 2 to 3h, the peak dose of N-ethylhexedrone lasted 4h, and the peak dose of MPHP lasted 6h. All four compounds fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine, although full substitution by 4-CEC occurred at doses that substantially decreased response rate. Only 4-CEC fully substituted for MDMA. These data provide evidence that the novel cathinone compounds dipentylone, N-ethylhexedrone, 4-CEC, and MPHP demonstrate potential for abuse as psychostimulants, given their ability to stimulate locomotor activity and their substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine.

Locomotor activity and discriminative stimulus effects of five novel synthetic cathinone analogs in mice and rats

BackgroundThe development of novel synthetic psychoactive substances continues to accelerate. There are little or no data on the pharmacological mechanisms, behavioral effects, or abuse liability of many of the newer compounds, despite increasing reports of severe adverse effects in recreational users. MethodsThe current study investigated the discriminative stimulus and locomotor stimulant effects of a group of synthetic cathinone analogs: N-ethylpentylone, dimethylone, dibutylone, clephedrone, 3′,4′-tetramethylene-α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone (TH-PVP). Locomotor activity was assessed in an open-field assay using Swiss-Webster mice. Discriminative stimulus effects were assessed in Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate either cocaine, methamphetamine or MDMA from vehicle. ResultsN-Ethylpentylone, dimethylone, dibutylone and clephedrone increased locomotor activity. Maximal effects were similar among the test compounds. Relative potencies were: methamphetamine > N-ethylpentylone > clephedrone > dimethylone > MDMA > cocaine > dibutylone. TH-PVP dose-dependently depressed locomotor activity. N-Ethylpentylone, dimethylone, dibutylone and clephedrone substituted fully for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. N-Ethylpentylone, dibutylone and clephedrone fully substituted for cocaine, whereas dimethylone produced a maximum of 67% drug-appropriate responding. Dimethylone, dibutylone and clephedrone fully substituted for MDMA, whereas N-ethylpentylone produced only 50% drug-appropriate responding. TH-PVP produced a maximum of 38% methamphetamine-appropriate responding, 50% cocaine-appropriate responding, and less than 1% MDMA-appropriate responding. ConclusionsThese data provide initial evidence that the novel psychoactive substances N-ethylpentylone, dimethylone, dibutylone, and clephedrone demonstrate potential for abuse as psychostimulants and/or club drugs, given their ability to stimulate locomotor activity and their substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, cocaine and/or MDMA. TH-PVP has minimal activity in the assays tested and may have little or no abuse liability.

Enrichment-induced differences in methamphetamine drug discrimination in male rats

Rats raised in an enriched environment show a decrease in sensitivity to the subjective effects of the psychostimulant d-amphetamine. The purpose of the present study was to determine if environmental enrichment during development alters the subjective effects of the more commonly abused drug methamphetamine. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were raised in either an enriched (EC) or an isolated condition (IC). EC and IC rats were trained on a two-lever operant procedure to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg (i.p.) methamphetamine from saline. Following acquisition of the discrimination a methamphetamine generalization curve (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) was determined. The antagonistic effects of dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.0075–0.06 mg/kg) and the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist eticlopride (0.01–0.3 mg/kg) were also tested. Finally, the ability of nicotine (0.05–0.5 mg/kg) to generalize and the ability of the nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (0.125–0.5 mg/kg) to antagonize the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine were determined. EC rats were less sensitive to discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine compared to IC rats at a low 0.3 mg/kg dose and showed full antagonism of methamphetamine discrimination following SCH23390 compared to IC rats. There were no environmentally-induced differences in the effects of eticlopride. Nicotine only partially generalized to the effects of methamphetamine in both EC and IC rats. While mecamylamine failed to antagonize the effects of methamphetamine in either EC or IC rats. These results suggest that environmental enrichment decreases sensitivity to the discriminative effects of methamphetamine and the differences may be mediated through changes in the D1 dopamine receptor.

“Ecstasy” to addiction: Mechanisms and reinforcing effects of three synthetic cathinone analogs of MDMA

This study aimed to address the mechanisms and reinforcing effects of three synthetic cathinone analogs of MDMA commonly reported in “Ecstasy” formulations: methylone, butylone, and pentylone. Whole-cell patch clamp techniques were used to assess the mechanism of each compound at the dopamine and serotonin transporters. Separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate methamphetamine, DOM, or MDMA from vehicle. Substitution studies were performed in each group and antagonism studies with SCH23390 were performed against each compound that produced substitution. Self-administration of each compound was evaluated under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Each compound produced an inward current at the serotonin transporter, but little or no current at the dopamine transporter. Each of the test compounds substituted fully for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, methylone and butylone substituted partially for DOM and fully for MDMA, whereas pentylone failed to substitute for DOM and substituted only partially for MDMA. SCH23390 fully and dose-dependently attenuated methamphetamine-appropriate responding produced by each test compound, but was least potent against pentylone. MDMA-appropriate responding was minimally affected by SCH23390. Each test compound was robustly self-administered with pentylone producing the greatest self-administration at the doses tested. Given the prevalence of synthetic cathinones in “Ecstasy” formulations, these data indicate that adulterated “Ecstasy” formulations may drive more compulsive drug use than those containing only MDMA.

Locomotor activity and discriminative stimulus effects of a novel series of synthetic cathinone analogs in mice and rats.

Recent years have seen an increase in the recreational use of novel, synthetic psychoactive substances. There are little or no data on the abuse liability of many of the newer compounds. The current study investigated the discriminative stimulus and locomotor effects of a series of synthetic analogs of cathinone: α-pyrrolidinopropiophenone (α-PPP), α-pyrrolidinohexiophenone (α-PHP), α-pyrrolidinopentiothiophenone (α-PVT), 3,4-methylenedioxybutiophenone (MDPBP), and ethylone. Locomotor activity was assessed in an open-field assay using Swiss-Webster mice. Discriminative stimulus effects were assessed in Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate either cocaine or methamphetamine from vehicle. Each of the compounds produced an inverted-U dose-effect on locomotor activity. Maximal effects were similar among the test compounds, but potencies varied with relative potencies of MDPBP>α-PPP=α-PHP>ethylone>α-PVT. Each of the test compounds substituted fully for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. α-PPP, α-PHP, and ethylone fully substituted for cocaine. α-PVT produced a maximum of 50% cocaine-appropriate responding, and MDPBP produced an inverted-U-shaped dose-effect curve with maximum effects of 67%. These data provide initial evidence that these structurally similar, emerging novel psychoactive substances demonstrate potential for abuse and may be utilized for their stimulant-like effects, given their ability to stimulate locomotor activity and their substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of the classical psychostimulants cocaine and/or methamphetamine.

Agmatine attenuates the discriminative stimulus and hyperthermic effects of methamphetamine in male rats.

Methamphetamine abuse remains an alarming public heath challenge, with no approved pharmacotherapies available. Agmatine is a naturally occurring cationic polyamine that has previously been shown to attenuate the rewarding and psychomotor-sensitizing effects of methamphetamine. This study examined the effects of agmatine on the discriminative stimulus and hyperthermic effects of methamphetamine. Adult male rats were trained to discriminate 0.32 mg/kg methamphetamine from saline. Methamphetamine dose dependently increased drug-associated lever responding. The nonselective dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) significantly attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine (5.9-fold rightward shift). Agmatine (10-100 mg/kg) did not substitute for methamphetamine, but significantly attenuated the stimulus effects of methamphetamine, leading to a maximum of a 3.5-fold rightward shift. Acute 10 mg/kg methamphetamine increased the rectal temperature by a maximum of 1.96±0.17°C. Agmatine (10-32 mg/kg) pretreatment significantly attenuated the hyperthermic effect of methamphetamine. Agmatine (10 mg/kg) also significantly reversed methamphetamine-induced temperature increase. Together, these results support further exploration of the value that agmatine may have for the treatment of methamphetamine abuse and overdose.

Relationship between discriminative stimulus effects and plasma methamphetamine and amphetamine levels of intramuscular methamphetamine in male rhesus monkeys

Methamphetamine is a globally abused drug that is metabolized to amphetamine, which also produces abuse-related behavioral effects. However, the contributing role of methamphetamine metabolism to amphetamine in methamphetamine's abuse-related subjective effects is unknown. This preclinical study was designed to determine 1) the relationship between plasma methamphetamine levels and methamphetamine discriminative stimulus effects and 2) the contribution of the methamphetamine metabolite amphetamine in the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rhesus monkeys. Adult male rhesus monkeys (n=3) were trained to discriminate 0.18mg/kg intramuscular (+)-methamphetamine from saline in a two-key food-reinforced discrimination procedure. Time course of saline, (+)-methamphetamine (0.032–0.32mg/kg), and (+)-amphetamine (0.032–0.32mg/kg) discriminative stimulus effects were determined. Parallel pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in the same monkeys to determine plasma methamphetamine and amphetamine levels after methamphetamine administration and amphetamine levels after amphetamine administration for correlation with behavior in the discrimination procedure. Both methamphetamine and amphetamine produced full, ≥90%, methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects. Amphetamine displayed a slightly, but significantly, longer duration of action than methamphetamine in the discrimination procedure. Both methamphetamine and amphetamine behavioral effects were related to methamphetamine and amphetamine plasma levels by a clockwise hysteresis loop indicating acute tolerance had developed to the discriminative stimulus effects. Furthermore, amphetamine levels after methamphetamine administration were absent when methamphetamine stimulus effects were greatest and peaked when methamphetamine discriminative stimulus effects returned to saline-like levels. Overall, these results demonstrate the methamphetamine metabolite amphetamine does not contribute to methamphetamine's abuse-related subjective effects.

Differential modulation of the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine by alprazolam and oxazepam in male and female rats

Drug users often combine benzodiazepines with psychostimulants, such as methamphetamine. However, very little research has been conducted on this type of polydrug use, particularly in female subjects. The present study was therefore designed to examine the effects of two benzodiazepines, alprazolam and oxazepam, on the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine in both male and female rats. Rats were trained to discriminate methamphetamine (1.0 mg/kg, ip) or cocaine (10 mg/kg, ip) from saline using a two-lever operant, food-reinforced, drug discrimination design. Pretreatment with oxazepam (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg, ip) significantly attenuated methamphetamine discrimination in both male and female rats. In contrast, however, the high dose of alprazolam (4 mg/kg, ip) actually augmented the subjective effects of lower doses of methamphetamine (0.125 and 0.25 mg/kg, ip). Oxazepam produced similar effects on the subjective effects of cocaine as with methamphetamine, significantly reducing cocaine discrimination in both male and female rats. However, neither the high nor low dose of alprazolam (2 and 4 mg/kg, ip) produced any apparent effect on cocaine discrimination. Finally, while similar results were observed in both male and female rats across these experiments, methamphetamine and cocaine discrimination were more sensitive to oxazepam in female subjects. The results of these experiments suggest that alprazolam and oxazepam can differentially affect the subjective effects of methamphetamine and cocaine. These results also demonstrate that alprazolam can differentially affect the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and cocaine.

Risky behaviors on the road: Do women and men act differently after drinking?

s / Drug and Alcohol Dependence 146 (2015) e34–e117 e105 Risky behaviors on the road: Do women and men act differently after drinking? Tanara R. Sousa1, Graciela Pasa1, Jeffrey Lunnen2, Flavio P. Pechansky1 1 Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil 2 Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States Aims: To compare differences between female andmale drivers regarding select risk factors in two Brazilian cities receiving intervention as part of the Global Road Safety Project. Methods: A knowledge, attitude and perception (KAP) survey was conducted among drivers in Palmas and Teresina. In October and November 2013, 1556 face to face interviews were conducted; samplingwasdonebyquotas, according todriver’s sex (70.9%male) and age. Results: The results show that females and males behave differently on the road. Females reported drinking and driving less (41.1% vs. 64.9% – p lofexidine (0.3mg/kg) = clonidine (0.3mg/kg) > guanfacine (1.8mg/kg). In drug discrimination studies, the discriminative stimulus effects of a cocaine-heroin mixture were not significantly altered by doses of brimonidine, guanfacine or clonidine below those that produced sedative effects and decreased operant responding to 50% decrease in the intake of cocaine/heroin mixtures without consistent modulation of their reinforcing strength. Conclusions: These data indicate that doses of alpha-2 agonists with behavioral side-effects that diminish over repeated treatment may be useful for in the management of polydrug (cocaine/heroin) addiction. Financial Support: (supported by DA 031299) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.653 Differential effects of the benzodiazepines alprazolam and oxazepam on methamphetamine-related behaviors in rats Allyson Spence, Glenn F. Guerin, Nicholas E. Goeders Pharmacology, Toxicology, & Neuroscience, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, United States Aims:Drugusers often combinebenzodiazepineswithpsychostimulants, such as methamphetamine (METH). Previous research has shown that not all benzo-diazepines have the same potential for abuse.While alprazolam (ALP) is highly preferred by drug users, oxazepam (OX) has a far lower abuse potential. We hypothesized thatMETHwould induce conditioned place preference (CPP), while OX and ALP would block the METH-induced CPP. We hypothesized that OX and ALP would attenuate METH discrimination. Methods: CPP was conducted to study the reward potential of the benzodiaz-epines OX and ALP when combined with METH to simulate polydrug abuse in rats (n=8/group). To determine if ALP and/orOXwouldalter the subjective effects ofMETH,wealso investigated the effects of these drugs on the discriminative stimulus effects of METH in rats (n=7/group). Rats were trained to discriminate METH (1.0mg/kg, ip) from saline using a two-lever operant, food-reinforced, drug discrimination design. The effects of ALP (2 and 4mg/kg, ip) and OX (5, 10, and 20mg/kg, ip) on METH discriminationwere determined by administering these drugs prior to variousdoses ofMETH (0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2mg/kg, ip) and then measuringwhether the rat pressed theMETHor saline-associated lever. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Results: METH produced a CPP, and OX blocked this METHinduced CPP. However, ALP did not block the METH-induced CPP. OX significantly attenuatedMETH discrimination in rats. However, we found that thehighdoseofALPaugmented the subjectiveeffects of lower doses of METH. Conclusions: The results of these experiments suggest that OX and ALP can differentially affect meth-related behaviors. OX attenuates the rewarding properties as well as the subjective effects of METH, while ALP may actually increase the rewarding properties of lower doses of METH. Future research will aim to identify the

Pavlovian discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).

Pavlovian drug discrimination (DD) procedures demonstrate that interoceptive drug stimuli may come to control behavior by informing the status of conditional relationships between stimuli and outcomes. This technique may provide insight into processes that contribute to drug-seeking, relapse, and other maladaptive behaviors associated with drug abuse. The purpose of the current research was to establish a model of Pavlovian DD in male Japanese quail. A Pavlovian conditioning procedure was used such that 3.0 mg/kg methamphetamine served as a feature positive stimulus for brief periods of visual access to a female quail and approach behavior was measured. After acquisition training, generalization tests were conducted with cocaine, nicotine, and haloperidol under extinction conditions. SCH 23390 was used to investigate the involvement of the dopamine D1 receptor subtype in the methamphetamine discriminative stimulus. Results showed that cocaine fully substituted for methamphetamine but nicotine only partially substituted for methamphetamine in quail. Haloperidol dose-dependently decreased approach behavior. Pretreatment with SCH 23390 modestly attenuated the methamphetamine discrimination suggesting that the D1 receptor subtype may be involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. The findings are discussed in relation to drug abuse and associated negative health consequences.

Cholinergic manipulations modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in C57BL/6J mice

Cholinergic transmission modulates several aspects of stimulant abuse, including initial exposure, transition to dependence, and relapse risk. The goals of the current work were to 1) establish methamphetamine (MA) as a discriminative stimulus (SD) in mice, 2) assess the ability of M1‐ or M1/M4‐active compounds to generalize from or block the SD effects of MA, and 3) evaluate the nACh receptor subtypes underlying the MA‐like SD effects of nicotine. Sixteen male C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate 1 mg/kg MA (i.p.) from saline on a FR‐12 schedule. Following acquisition (41 ± 3 sessions), substitution testing revealed that the M1/M4‐preferrring agonist xanomeline and the M1‐preferring agonist n‐desmethylclozapine were perceived as saline‐like whereas the non‐selective antagonist scopolamine and the M1‐preferring antagonists trihexyphenidyl and dicyclomine exhibited low partial substitution for MA. Pretreatments were administered 10‐min prior to MA during blocking tests, and it was observed that dicyclomine producing a leftward shift in the MA dose‐response curve whereas xanomeline resulted in a non‐significant rightward shift. Nicotine partially generalized (50%) from MA in mice, and pretreatment with the nACh antagonists mecamylamine and DHβE as well as the partial agonist varenicline completely blocked the MA‐like SD effects of nicotine. Supported by DA018165, AA016849 and OD011092.

The GPR88 receptor agonist 2-PCCA does not alter the behavioral effects of methamphetamine in rats

GPR88 is a novel orphan G protein-coupled receptor that is primarily located at the striatum. Genetic knockout studies reveal phenotypes of increased dopamine D2 receptor sensitivity in mice, suggesting that GPR88 receptors may be involved in the modulation of dopaminergic system. However, there is no study that examines the pharmacological effects of GPR88 receptor ligands in in vivo preparations. This study examined the effects of a GPR88 receptor agonist, (1R, 2R)-2-pyridin-2-yl-cyclopropane carboxylic acid ((2S, 3S)-2-amino-3-methyl-pentyl)-(4′-propylbiphenyl-4-yl)-amide (2-PCCA), on the motor activity in rats and on methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity and discriminative stimulus effects. 2-PCCA (0.1–3.2mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased the locomotor activity in rats and, when studied in combination with 1.0mg/kg methamphetamine, also dose-dependently decreased methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity. However, the dose of 2-PCCA that significantly attenuated methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity was also the dose that by itself markedly decreased the baseline locomotor activity. In rats discriminating 0.32mg/kg methamphetamine, 2-PCCA (1–3.2mg/kg) itself did not produce methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects and, when studied in combination, did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. Together, these data have provided the first line of evidence that activation of GPR88 receptors does not alter the behavioral effects of methamphetamine. The potential implications of these findings are also discussed.

Antagonism of Metabotropic Glutamate 1 Receptors Attenuates Behavioral Effects of Cocaine and Methamphetamine in Squirrel Monkeys

Within the group I family of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), substantial evidence points to a role for mGluR5 mechanisms in cocaine's abuse-related behavioral effects, but less is understood about the contribution of mGluR1, which also belongs to the group I mGluR family. The selective mGluR1 antagonist JNJ16259685 [(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano-[2,3-b]quinolin-7-yl)-(cis-4-methoxycyclohexyl)-methanone] was used to investigate the role of mGluR1 in the behavioral effects of cocaine and methamphetamine. In drug discrimination experiments, squirrel monkeys were trained to discriminate cocaine from saline by using a two-lever, food-reinforced operant procedure. JNJ16259685 (0.56 mg/kg) pretreatments significantly attenuated cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects and the cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. In monkeys trained to self-administer cocaine or methamphetamine under a second-order schedule of intravenous drug injection, JNJ16259685 (0.56 mg/kg) significantly reduced drug-reinforced responding, resulting in a downward displacement of dose-response functions. In reinstatement studies, intravenous priming with cocaine accompanied by restoration of a cocaine-paired stimulus reinstated extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior, which was significantly attenuated by JNJ16259685 (0.56 mg/kg). Finally, in experiments involving food rather than drug self-administration, cocaine and methamphetamine increased the rate of responding, and the rate-increasing effects of both psychostimulants were significantly attenuated by JNJ16259685 (0.3 mg/kg). At the doses tested, JNJ16259685 did not significantly suppress food-reinforced behavior (drug discrimination or fixed-interval schedule of food delivery), but did significantly reduce species-typical locomotor activity in observational studies. To the extent that the psychostimulant-antagonist effects of JNJ16259685 are independent of motor function suppression, further research is warranted to investigate other mGluR1 antagonists for potential therapeutic value in psychostimulant abuse.

SA 4503 attenuates cocaine-induced hyperactivity and enhances methamphetamine substitution for a cocaine discriminative stimulus

Cocaine exhibits preferential (~ 15-fold) affinity for σ 1 over σ 2 sigma receptors, and previous research has shown an interaction of σ 1 receptor-selective ligands and cocaine's behavioral effects. The present study investigated the effect of the putative sigma receptor agonist SA 4503 (1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenethyl)-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride) on cocaine's locomotor stimulatory and discriminative stimulus properties. At doses without intrinsic activity, SA 4503 dose-dependently attenuated cocaine-induced hyperactivity in mice. This inhibition was overcome by increasing the cocaine dose. In rats trained to use cocaine as a discriminative stimulus in a drug discrimination task, doses of SA 4503 that did not substitute for the cocaine stimulus did not alter the cocaine substitution curve. However, SA 4503 potentiated the effect of methamphetamine to substitute for the cocaine stimulus. These data support a role for sigma receptors in the locomotor-activating properties of cocaine and, importantly, indicate a role for these receptors in the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. The data also suggest sigma receptors mediate the activity of different dopamine pathways responsible for the behavioral effects of psychostimulants.

Nicotine and methamphetamine share discriminative stimulus effects

Background Nicotine and methamphetamine are both abused in similar settings, sometimes together. Because there are known interactions between central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and dopamine receptors, it is of interest to characterize the nature of the interaction of these two compounds in vivo. Methods The purpose of this study was to characterize the extent to which these two compounds produce similar discriminative stimulus effects and to identify pharmacological mechanisms for their interaction. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were trained to discriminate methamphetamine or nicotine from saline. First, the ability of methamphetamine and nicotine to cross-substitute in rats trained to the other compound was tested. Subsequently, the ability of a dopamine antagonist (haloperidol) and a centrally acting nicotinic antagonist (mecamylamine) to block the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and nicotine were also tested. Results Nicotine fully substituted in methamphetamine-trained rats, but methamphetamine only partially substituted in nicotine-trained rats. In nicotine-trained rats, mecamylamine fully antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine, but haloperidol had no effect. The partial substitution of methamphetamine was partially attenuated by haloperidol, but not altered by mecamylamine. In methamphetamine-trained rats, mecamylamine failed to antagonize the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, but haloperidol fully blocked the methamphetamine cue. Mecamylamine blocked the ability of nicotine to substitute for methamphetamine, but haloperidol had no effect. Conclusions These results indicate that nicotine and methamphetamine share discriminative stimulus effects in some subjects and that the two compounds do not act at the same site, but produce their interaction indirectly. These findings suggest that these two compounds might be at least partially interchangeable in human users, and that there are potentially interesting pharmacological reasons for the commonly observed co-administration of nicotine and methamphetamine.

Discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and in vivo microdialysis in rats

The present studies were conducted to examine the relationship between discriminative stimulus effects of MA and its ability to increase extracellular levels of DA in the n. accumbens (nACC) shell. Fist, the behavioral effects of cumulatively administered MA, cocaine (COC), and related stimulants were determined in rats trained to discriminate IP injections of MA (0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg) from saline. In other studies, in vivo microdialysis was used to determine the effects of cumulatively administered MA and COC on extracellular DA levels in the nACC shell. d-Amphetamine, COC, GBR 12909, methylphenidate and AM 2547 produced dose-related and full substitution for 0.3 mg/kg MA. In contrast, comparable doses of COC, GBR 12909, methylphenidate and AM 2547 did not fully mimic the effects of 1.0 mg/kg MA. In microdialysis studies, MA (0.3 – 3 mg/kg) and COC (3 – 30 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent increase in DA efflux in the nACC shell to approximate maxima of, respectively, 1700% and 550% of control values. In 1.0 mg/kg MA-trained rats, the ED50 dose of MA (0.34 mg/kg) and cocaine (3.98 mg/kg) produced approximately 340% and 210% increases in DA, respectively. In 0.3 mg/kg MA-trained rats, the ED50 dose of MA (0.11 mg/kg) and cocaine (3.03 mg/kg) produced approximately 220% and 200% increases DA levels, respectively. Taken together, these results support a prominent role for dopamine in MA-like discriminative-stimulus effects.

Discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine and morphine in rats are attenuated by cAMP-related compounds

Animal models of drug discrimination have been used to examine the subjective effects of addictive substances. The cAMP system is a crucial downstream signaling pathway implicated in the long-lasting neuroadaptations induced by addictive drugs. We examined effects of rolipram, nefiracetam, and dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists, all of which have been reported to modulate cAMP level in vivo, on the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine (METH) and morphine in rats. All these compounds inhibited the discriminative-stimulus effects of METH, while only rolipram and nefiracetam attenuated the discriminative-stimulus effects of morphine. In addition, neither nifedipine nor neomycin, two voltage-sensitive calcium channel blockers, was found to modulate the effect of nefiracetam on METH-associated discriminative stimuli, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of nefiracetam may not involve the activation of calcium channels. These findings suggest that the cAMP signaling cascade may play a key role in the discriminative-stimulus effects of METH and morphine and may be a potential target for the development of therapeutics to counter drugs of abuse.

GABAergic modulation of the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine

To assess whether gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) modulation of dopamine is important in mediation of the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, the GABA compounds chlordiazepoxide (benzodiazepine site agonist), pentobarbital (barbiturate site agonist), bicuculline and pentylenetetrazol (GABA(A) receptor antagonists) were tested in Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate methamphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) from saline. Each of the compounds produced modest amounts of methamphetamine-appropriate responding (20-35%) when tested alone. When tested in combination with methamphetamine, the antagonists (bicuculline and pentylenetetrazol) failed to shift the methamphetamine dose-effect curve. In contrast, chlordiazepoxide (25 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced methamphetamine-appropriate responding at each dose of methamphetamine tested, and pentobarbital (10 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently decreased the discriminative stimulus effects of 1 mg/kg methamphetamine. In conclusion, GABA(A) antagonists and positive modulators likely do not produce methamphetamine-like stimulus effects. However, activation of GABA(A) receptors can interfere with the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine.