Direction Of Sexual Dimorphism Research Articles

Vertically inherited microbiota and environment-modifying behaviors indirectly shape the exaggeration of secondary sexual traits in the gazelle dung beetle.

Many organisms actively manipulate the environment in ways that feed back on their own development, a process referred to as developmental niche construction. Yet, the role that constructed biotic and abiotic environments play in shaping phenotypic variation and its evolution is insufficiently understood. Here, we assess whether environmental modifications made by developing dung beetles impact the environment-sensitive expression of secondary sexual traits. Gazelle dung beetles both physically modify their ontogenetic environment and structure their biotic interactions through the vertical inheritance of microbial symbionts. By experimentally eliminating (i) physical environmental modifications and (ii) the vertical inheritance of microbes, we assess the degree to which (sym)biotic and physical environmental modifications shape the exaggeration of several traits varying in their degree and direction of sexual dimorphism. We expected the experimental reduction of a larva's ability to shape its environment to affect trait size and scaling, especially for traits that are sexually dimorphic and environmentally plastic. We find that compromised developmental niche construction indeed shapes sexual dimorphism in overall body size and the absolute sizes of male-limited exaggerated head horns, the strongly sexually dimorphic fore tibia length and width, as well as the weakly dimorphic elytron length and width. This suggests that environmental modifications affect sex-specific phenotypic variation in functional traits. However, most of these effects can be attributed to nutrition-dependent plasticity in size and non-isometric trait scaling rather than body-size-independent effects on the developmental regulation of trait size. Our findings suggest that the reciprocal relationship between developing organisms, their symbionts, and their environment can have considerable impacts on sexual dimorphism and functional morphology.

Immune defense in Drosophila melanogaster depends on diet, sex, and mating status.

Immune defense is a complex trait that affects and is affected by many other host factors, including sex, mating, and dietary environment. We used the agriculturally relevant fungal emtomopathogen, Beauveria bassiana, and the model host organism Drosophila melanogaster to examine how the impacts of sex, mating, and dietary environment on immunity are interrelated. We showed that the direction of sexual dimorphism in immune defense depends on mating status and mating frequency. We also showed that post-infection dimorphism in immune defense changes over time and is affected by dietary condition both before and after infection. Supplementing the diet with protein-rich yeast improved post-infection survival but more so when supplementation was done after infection instead of before. The multi-directional impacts among immune defense, sex, mating, and diet are clearly complex, and while our study shines light on some of these relationships, further study is warranted. Such studies have potential downstream applications in agriculture and medicine.

Do female frogs have higher resting metabolic rates than males? A case study with Xenopus allofraseri

AbstractThe energetic costs of body maintenance can have a profound influence on the energy that an individual can allocate to other functions such as growth, locomotion, or reproduction. Therefore, resting metabolism can ultimately affect an individual's survival or reproductive success, especially when food is limited. Although males and females often differ in their body composition (e.g. sex organs and fat accumulation) and body size, the occurrence and direction of sexual dimorphism in resting metabolism remains poorly understood in anurans. In the present study, we investigated whether males and females of the false Fraser's clawed frog Xenopus allofraseri differ in their resting metabolic rates. We used an open‐flow push‐through respirometry system to measure the volume of carbon dioxide (VCO2) produced by animals at rest. Variation inwas explained by ambient temperature, body size, and sex. For a similar body size, our results revealed that females had about a 50% higher resting metabolic rate (RMR) than males. We suggest that the enhanced investment in gamete production in females compared to males may explain this difference. We further suggest that a lower RMR in males compared to females at similar body size could be selectively advantageous as unallocated energy may be devoted to costly mating, in support of the ‘compensation’ hypothesis.

Why males and females look different

Why do males and females look different? In “Odd Couples: Extraordinary Differences Between the Sexes in the Animal Kingdom,” (2013, Princeton University Press, p. 312), Daphne J. Fairbairn provides a scrupulous catalog of possible answers, perhaps the most detailed collection of animal sex differences since Darwin’s 1874 “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex.” Sexual dimorphism is the condition in which males and females exhibit distinct phenotypes, beyond physiological traits involved with reproduction. Fairbairn’s volume is supplied with some of the best examples of such differences now known, and the disparate sources of data are pressed into compelling shape by a talented scholar and careful experimentalist. Fairbairn’s manifesto is, “an overtly Darwinian approach to understanding sexual differences” (p. 3). She notes that when selection operates in sex-specific ways, “we expect trait distributions typical for each sex to be adaptive for that sex” (p. 4), and she launches the reader into this view of dimorphism with sweeping taxonomic and gender-modified scope. We learn of lumbering male elephant seals, who in the throes of their ardor may annihilate the offspring of their future mates; of great bustards, giant Eurasian cranes whose males shove rivals and take blows to the face like bear-pit pugilists while females watch nearby; of shellcarrying cichlid fish, whose territorial and satellite males dart and parry for opportunities to ejaculate into snail shells containing females’ unfertilized ova. As vertebrates, we humans are most familiar with mating systems in which males are larger or somehow more elaborate than females. Fairbairn answers this preexisting bias with fascinating contrasts, weaving tales of yellow garden spiders and blanket octopus, whose gigantic females either squat in the center of conspicuous webs, or float huge and enigmatic over tropical reefs, each attended by males of their species as much as 40,000 times smaller in size. We learn of giant seadevil anglerfish, whose enormous, fang-jawed females host tiny males, who cling to female undersides by their own peculiar mouths, absorbing nutrients from a shared bloodstream and dangling close enough to their mate’s genitalia to ensure successful spawning. Fairbairn details the divergent life histories of bizarre, deep-sea bone worms whose females embed their bulbous bodies within decaying skeletons of whales, and maintain hundreds of minute suitors within their translucent skins. Lastly, she describes shell-burrowing barnacles, in which embedded females may (or may not—45% of females fail to mate) host posses of minuscule males with colossal, inflatable penises that may exceed each little fellow’s corporal dimensions by as much as eight times. The density of information and much delightful prose make this a fascinating read for lay and professional readers alike. Footnotes and appendices comprise nearly one-third of the book. One diagram describes the distribution of sexual dimorphism among 73 animal classes, a synthesis across 1.4 million species that is the first I have seen of its kind. Fairbairn glides among the animals with remarkable skill, and does Darwin one better with abundant recent data. In each chapter, she recounts male and female life spans, the fractions of individuals who do and do not mate, and the numbers of offspring that individuals in each sex produce. The raw materials are here to make concise, quantitative statements about how a sex difference in the variance in relative fitness (also known as the opportunity for sexual selection; Wade 1979) can explain the magnitude and direction of sexual dimorphism. But each chapter ends without an attempt. Offspring numbers are what Fairbairn considers “the currency of Darwinian fitness,” yet the trove of such information presented is used mainly for implication. Fairbairn concludes, “the enduring message is that there is no one way of being a male or a female animal . . . there is no “normal” or “typical” pattern of sexual differentiation across the animal kingdom,” and furthermore that the lack of sex differences in externally fertilizing species “remains a mystery” (p. 165). I found such capitulation

Sexual Dimorphism in the Parasitoid Wasps Aphidius balcanicus, Aphidius rosae, and Aphidius urticae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae)

Abstract In this study, we explored variations in the magnitude and the direction of sexual dimorphism in three parasitoid species from the genus Aphidius Nees (Aphidius balcanicus Tomanović and Petrović, Aphidius rosae Haliday, and Aphidius urticae Haliday). We also explored the variation in sexual dimorphism within one of these species, A. urticae, which parasitizes and develops in three different hosts that belong to three aphid genera. To estimate sexual size dimorphism, we selected two developmentally and functionally unrelated morphological structures: the mesoscutum and the wing. Our results showed that sexual dimorphism in mesoscutum and wing size differ (sexual dimorphism in mesoscutum size appears to be insignificant, whereas the wings are larger in males). We found a high level of variation in sexual dimorphism in wing shape within and between species. We also found that the observed shape changes are not due to size-related, allometric changes in wing shape. These results indicate that sexual dimorphism in wing size and wing shape is highly variable and could be influenced by various factors, including host effects, whereas mesoscutum size appears to be a conserved trait in aphid parasitoids.

Sexual dimorphism in the skull geometry of newt species of Ichthyosaura, Triturus and Lissotriton (Salamandridae, Caudata, Amphibia)

In this study, we applied geometric morphometrics to explore variations in the level and pattern of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) and sexual shape dimorphism (SShD) of the ventral cranium in three different Modern Eurasian newt taxa (Ichthyosaura alpestris, Triturus species group and Lissotriton vulgaris). The ventral cranium is the part of the skull that is more directly related to foraging and feeding. Our results indicate that the level and pattern of sexual dimorphism in the ventral cranium differ among Modern Eurasian newt taxa. Regarding sexual dimorphism in skull size, Ichthyosaura alpestris and Triturus species show female-biased patterns (females are larger than males), whereas Lissotriton vulgaris appears to be non-dimorphic in skull size. In I. alpestris and Triturus species, SShD is mostly absent, whereas in L. vulgaris, SShD is more pronounced. A high level of variation between populations in both SSD and SShD indicates that local conditions may have a profound effect on the magnitude and direction of sexual dimorphism. The significant sexual differences in ventral cranium size and shape indicate possible subtle intersexual differences in ecological demands due to diet specialisation, in spite of similar general ecological settings.

Reversal of height dimorphism promotes pollen and seed dispersal in a wind-pollinated dioecious plant

Variation in the timing of reproductive functions in dioecious organisms may result in adaptive changes in the direction of sexual dimorphism during the breeding season. For plants in which both pollen and seeds are wind-dispersed, it may be advantageous for male plants to be taller when pollen is dispersed and female plants to be taller when seeds are dispersed. We examined the dynamics of height dimorphism in Rumex hastatulus, an annual, wind-pollinated, dioecious plant from the southern USA. A field survey of seven populations indicated that females were significantly taller than males at seed maturity. However, a glasshouse experiment revealed a more complex pattern of height growth during the life cycle. No dimorphism was evident prior to reproduction for six of seven populations, but at flowering, males were significantly taller than females in all populations. This pattern was reversed at reproductive maturity, consistent with field observations. Males flowered later than females and the degree of height dimorphism was greater in populations with a later onset of male flowering. We discuss the potential adaptive significance of temporal changes in height dimorphism for pollen and seed dispersal, and how this may be optimized for the contrasting reproductive functions of the sexes.

Sexual selection and mating systems

Sexual selection is among the most powerful of all evolutionary forces. It occurs when individuals within one sex secure mates and produce offspring at the expense of other individuals within the same sex. Darwin was first to recognize the power of sexual selection to change male and female phenotypes, and, in noting that sexual selection is nonubiquitous, Darwin was also first to recognize the importance of mating system--the "special circumstances" in which reproduction occurs within species. Analyses of mating systems since Darwin have emphasized either the genetic relationships between male and female mating elements, usually among plants, or the numbers of mates males and females may obtain, usually among animals. Combining these schemes yields a quantitative methodology that emphasizes measurement of the sex difference in the variance in relative fitness, as well as phenotypic and genetic correlations underlying reproductive traits that may arise among breeding pairs. Such information predicts the degree and direction of sexual dimorphism within species, it allows the classification of mating systems using existing genetic and life history data, and with information on the spatial and temporal distributions of fertilizations, it may also predict floral morphology in plants. Because this empirical framework identifies selective forces and genetic architectures responsible for observed male-female differences, it compliments discoveries of nucleotide sequence variation and the expression of quantitative traits. Moreover, because this methodology emphasizes the process of evolutionary change, it is easier to test and interpret than frameworks emphasizing parental investment in offspring and its presumed evolutionary outcomes.

Costal process of the first sacral vertebra: Sexual dimorphism and obstetrical adaptation

The human sacrum is sexually dimorphic, with males being larger than females in most dimensions. Previous studies, though, suggest that females may have a longer costal process of the first sacral vertebra (S1) than males. However, these studies neither quantified nor tested statistically the costal process of S1. This study compares S1 with the five lumbar vertebrae (L1 to L5) for a number of metric dimensions, including costal process length. Four issues are addressed, the: 1) hypothesis that females have a longer costal process of S1 than males; 2)hypothesis that homologous structures (i.e., costal processes of L1 to S1) differ in their direction of sexual dimorphism; 3) importance of the costal process of S1 to the obstetrical capacity of the pelvis; and 4) evolution of sexual dimorphism in costal process length of S1. One hundred ninety-seven individuals, including males and females of American blacks and whites, from the Hamann-Todd and Terry Collections were studied. Results show that males are significantly larger than females for most vertebral measurements, except that females have a significantly longer costal process of S1 than males. Costal process length of S1 is positively correlated with the transverse diameter and circumference of the pelvic inlet. The magnitude of sexual dimorphism in costal process length of S1 ranks this measure among the most highly dimorphic of the pelvis. Compared with the humans in this study, australopithecines have a relatively long costal process of S1, but their broad sacrum was not associated with obstetrical imperatives.

Diversity of sexual dimorphism in electrocommunication signals and its androgen regulation in a genus of electric fish, Apteronotus.

Gymnotiform electric fish emit an electric organ discharge that, in several species, is sexually dimorphic and functions in gender recognition. In addition, some species produce frequency modulations of the electric organ discharge, known as chirps, that are displayed during aggression and courtship. We report that two congeneric species (Apteronotus leptorhynchus and A. albifrons) differ in the expression of sexual dimorphism in these signals. In A. leptorhynchus, males chirp more than females, but in A. albifrons chirping is monomorphic. The gonadosomatic index and plasma levels of 11-ketotestosterone were equivalent in both species, suggesting that they were in similar reproductive condition. Corresponding to this difference in dimorphism, A. leptorhynchus increases chirping in response to androgens, but chirping in A. albifrons is insensitive to implants of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone or 11-ketotestosterone. Species also differ in the sexual dimorphism and androgen sensitivity of electric organ discharge frequency. In A. leptorhynchus, male discharge at higher frequencies than females, and androgens increase electric organ discharge frequency. In A. albifrons, males discharge at lower frequencies than females, and androgens decrease electronic organ discharge frequency. Thus, in both chirping and electric organ discharge frequency, evolutionary changes in the presence or direction of sexual dimorphism have been accompanied and perhaps caused by changes in the androgen regulation of the electric organ discharge.

Patterns of temperature‐dependent sex determination in turtles

AbstractAmong reptiles that show temperature‐dependent sex determination, sex ratios vary across constant incubation temperatures in ways sufficiently predictable to allow classification into patterns. One common pattern shows low temperatures yielding only males and high temperatures yielding only females. Another common pattern has low as well as high temperatures yielding only or mostly females and some intermediate temperatures yielding mostly males. Patterns tend to be associated with the direction of sexual dimorphism in adult size, especially for species with strong dimorphism.Pivotal temperatures (those yielding 1:1 sex ratios) within the best‐documented species and genera tend to increase with both latitude and longitude across central and southern North America. These geographic trends probably reflect factors that affect nest temperatures (duration of growing season, insolation, and prevailing amounts of shading by vegetation).Data from a population of the alligator snapping turtle (Macroclemys temminckii) suggest that some embryos are temperature‐independent females because these individuals become females even when they are shifted among male‐producing temperatures during development. These individuals are also more frequent in clutches of small eggs. In this and several other species, no constant incubation temperatures yield more than 75% males. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Sexual dimorphism in leg length among orb‐weaving spiders: a possible role for sexual cannibalism

The degree and direction of sexual dimorphism across different species is commonly attributed to differences in the selection pressures acting on males and females. The extent of these differences is especially apparent in species that practise sexual cannibalism, where the female attempts to capture and eat a courting male. Here, we investigate the relationship between sexual dimorphism in size and leg length, sexual cannibalism and courtship behaviour in three taxonomic groups of orb‐weaving spiders, using morphological data from 249 species in 36 genera. Females are larger than males in all three taxonomic groups, and males have relatively longer legs than females in both the Araneinae and Tetragnathidae. Across genera within each taxonomic group, male body size is positively correlated with both female body size and male leg length, and female body size is positively correlated with female leg length. Sexual size dimorphism is negatively correlated with relative male leg length within the Araneinae, but not within either the Tetragnathidae or the Gasteracanthinae. There was no negative correlation between sexual size dimorphism and relative female leg length in any taxonomic group. We argue that the relationship between sexual size dimorphism and relative male leg length within the Araneinae may be the result of selection imposed by sexual cannibalism by females.