Direct Oral Anticoagulants Research Articles

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) in the Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) Era

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon complication of heparin therapy with significant risk for severe morbidity and mortality. We investigated the role and outcome of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of HIT. After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a retrospective review was performed identifying all patients with positive HIT serotonin-release assays between 2020 and 2022 at two hospitals. The demographic and clinical variables were collected as follows: initial anticoagulant, dosing and indication, interval before onset of HIT, thrombotic complications, platelet nadir and recovery, direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) and DOAC usage, and clinical outcomes. 15 patients were included in the study. 8 underwent a vascular procedure, 3 had cardiac surgery, 1 patient had both and was included in both groups, and 5 patients had either noncardiac, nonvascular surgery, or no surgery. 14 patients received unfractionated heparin (93% with therapeutic dosing), and 1 received prophylactic enoxaparin prior to diagnosis of HIT. The average time to diagnosis of HIT was 10.77days after initial anticoagulation. In-hospital mortality was 27%, related to Covid-19 infection (3/4) and intracranial hemorrhage (1/4). 40% developed thrombosis (67% venous, 33% arterial) after the diagnosis of HIT. 8/11 survivors were discharged on a DOAC. With DOAC therapy, platelet counts rebounded to an average of 265K (±104.6K) within an average of 2.3days and 364K (±273.9K) within 30days after initiation of a DOAC. No recurrent thrombosis occurred after DOAC administration and only one patient had persistent thrombocytopenia within 30days. Mortality and thrombosis (arterial and venous) are common complications in patients diagnosed with HIT. In patients who survive to discharge, DOACs are the most common discharge antithrombotic agent, with low rates of recurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia.

Optimal initial duration of low molecular weight heparin lead-in before direct oral anticoagulants for short-term outcomes of hospitalized patients with non-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism.

There are currently three strategies for the duration of LMWH lead-in before DOACs in patients with acute PE: one is at least 5 days, the other is at least 3 days, and the last one is less than 3 days. Which one is the best is yet unknown. We divided non-high-risk PE patients into short-LMWH (LMWH <3 days), intermediate-LMWH (LMWH 3-5 days), and long-LMWH (LMWH >5 days) groups, in a 1:1:2 ratio by using propensity score matching. Primary outcomes were a composite of mortality including all-cause and PE-related mortality, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding, as well as each one of them, at 3-month after PE diagnosis. The short-LMWH group (N = 504) had higher 3-month composite primary outcome (129 [25.6%] vs 67 [13.3%], P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (112 [22.2%] vs 39 [7.7%], P < 0.001), and PE-related mortality (48 [9.5%] vs 17 [3.4%], P < 0.001), than the intermediate-LMWH group (N = 504). The short-LMWH group also had higher 3-month composite primary outcome (129 [25.6%] vs 151 [15.0%], P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (112 [22.2%] vs 90 [8.9%], P < 0.001), and PE-related mortality (48 [9.5%] vs 41 [4.1%], P < 0.001) than the long-LMWH group (N = 1008). The VTE recurrence and major bleeding rates were similar between the short-LMWH and intermediate-LMWH groups, and between the short-LMWH and long-LMWH groups. The intermediate-LMWH and long-LMWH groups had similar 3-month primary outcomes rates in whole or in part with each other. For patients with non-high-risk acute PE, the optimal duration of initial LMWH lead-in before switching to DOACs could be 3 to 5 days.

Anticoagulation reversal (vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, andexanet-α, protamine).

Bleeding events are common in patients prescribed anticoagulants and can have devastating consequences. Several specific and nonspecific agents have been developed to reverse the effects of anticoagulant drugs or toxins. Vitamin K, as the oldest of these antidotes, specifically counteracts the effects of pharmaceuticals and rodenticides designed to deplete stores of vitamin K-dependent factors. In cases of life-threatening bleeding, the addition of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) allows for the immediate replacement of coagulation factors. While the use of PCCs has been extended to the non-specific reversal of the effects of newer direct oral anticoagulants, the specific agents idarucizumab, targeting dabigatran and andexanet-α, binding factor Xa inhibitors, have recently been developed and are being preferentially recommended by most guidelines. However, despite having rapid effects on correcting coagulopathy, there is to date a lack of robust evidence establishing the clear superiority of direct oral anticoagulant-specific reversal agents over PCCs in terms of haemostatic efficacy, safety or mortality. For andexanet-α, a potential signal of increased thromboembolic risks, comparatively high costs and low availability might also limit its use, even though emerging evidence appears to bolster its role in intracranial haemorrhage. Protamine is the specific agent for the reversal of unfractionated heparin anticoagulation used mainly in cardiovascular surgery. It is much less effective for low molecular weight heparin fragments and is usually reserved for cases with life-threatening bleeding.

Direct oral anticoagulants for oral anticoagulants-naïve Asian patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis

In Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains debatable. From the national health insurance claims data in South Korea, we included 425 new users of OAC among patients with non-valvular AF and ESRD undergoing dialysis between 2013 and 2020. Patients were categorized into DOAC (n = 106) and warfarin group (n = 319). Clinical outcomes, including ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, were compared between the two groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. During the median follow-up of 3.2 years, the incidence of ischemic stroke was significantly reduced in the DOAC compared to the warfarin group [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.07; P = 0.001]. However, the incidence of MI (HR 1.32; P = 0.41) and GI bleeding (HR 1.78; P = 0.06) were not significantly different between the two groups. No ICH events occurred in the DOAC group, although the incidence rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.17). In Asian patients with AF and ESRD undergoing dialysis, DOACs may be associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke compared with warfarin. The MI, ICH, and GI bleeding rates may be comparable between DOACs and warfarin.

Feasibility of anticoagulation on demand after percutaneous coronary intervention in high-bleeding risk patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the INTERMITTENT registry.

This study evaluated the feasibility of the intermittent use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) guided by continuous rhythm monitoring via a clinically validated wearable smart device in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) otherwise subjected to chronic anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The INTERMITTENT registry was a 3-year prospective observational study at eight Italian centres. Inclusion criteria were elective or urgent PCI, Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria, history of symptomatic 12-lead ECG detected paroxysmal AF episodes, indication to DOACs, and use of a wearable smart device (Apple Watch™). Thirty days after PCI, patients free of AF episodes discontinued DOAC. However, if an AF episode lasting >6 min or a total AF burden > 6 h over 24 h was detected, DOAC was initiated for 30 consecutive days, and withdrawn afterwards if no further AF episodes occurred. At the discretion of the referring physician, intermittent anticoagulation was offered to 89 patients, whereas continuous treatment with DOACs was prescribed to 151 patients. During a follow-up of 298 ± 87 days, the average duration of oral anticoagulation was significantly shorter in the intermittent anticoagulation group (176 ± 43 days, P = 0.0001), representing a 40% reduction in anticoagulation time compared to the continuous group. Ischaemic and bleeding endpoints were not significantly different between the two groups. Propensity score-matching resulted in a total of 69 matched patients with intermittent vs. continuous anticoagulation, respectively. During a follow-up of 291 ± 63 days, there was a significant 46% reduction in anticoagulation time in the intermittent compared to the continuous group (P = 0.0001). In HBR patients with a history of paroxysmal AF episodes who underwent PCI, intermittent anticoagulation guided by continuous rhythm monitoring with a wearable device was feasible and decreased significantly the duration of anticoagulation.

Overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Incorrectly dosed DOAC treatment is associated with excess mortality. This article aims at raising awareness of DOAC overdosing and its causes as well as presenting adiagnostic and therapeutic work-up. Based on acase presentation, astructured review of the current literature on DOAC overdosing was performed and treatment recommendations were extracted. In addition to wittingly or unwittingly increased DOAC intake, common causes of overdose are inadequate dose adjustment for concomitant medication or comorbidities. Global coagulation testing should be supplemented with DOAC-specific testing. Severe bleeding and the need for invasive diagnostics or urgent surgery represent indications for treating DOAC overdoses. Based on the cause of an DOAC overdose, active charcoal, endoscopic pill rescue, antagonization with idarucizumab or andexanet alfa and the targeted substitution of coagulation factors represent treatment options. The sensitization of clinicians is important to ensure atimely diagnosis and adequate treatment of DOAC overdosing. This report provides an overview of current knowledge on diagnostics and treatment; however, further studies are necessary to improve the existing algorithms.

Association of Antithrombotic Drug Use With Incident Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location.

Few population-based studies have assessed associations between the use of antithrombotic (platelet antiaggregant or anticoagulant) drugs and location-specific risks of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (s-ICH). In this study, we estimated associations between antithrombotic drug use and the risk of lobar vs nonlobar incident s-ICH. Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified cases in the Southern Denmark Region of first-ever s-ICH in patients aged 50 years or older between 2009 and 2018. Each verified case was classified as lobar or nonlobar s-ICH and matched to controls in the general population by age, sex, and calendar year. Prior antithrombotic use was ascertained from a nationwide prescription registry. We calculated odds ratios (aORs) for associations between the use of clopidogrel, aspirin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and lobar and nonlobar ICH in conditional logistic regression analyses that were adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 1,040 cases of lobar (47.9% men, mean age [SD] 75.2 [10.7] years) and 1,263 cases of nonlobar s-ICH (54.2% men, mean age 73.6 [11.4] years) were matched to 41,651 and 50,574 controls, respectively. A stronger association with lobar s-ICH was found for clopidogrel (cases: 7.6%, controls: 3.5%; aOR 3.46 [95% CI 2.45-4.89]) vs aspirin (cases: 22.9%, controls: 20.4%; aOR 2.14 [1.74-2.63; p = 0.019). Corresponding estimates for nonlobar s-ICH were not different between clopidogrel (cases: 5.4%, controls: 3.4%; aOR 2.44 [1.71-3.49]) and aspirin (cases: 20.7%, controls: 19.2%; aOR 1.77 [1.47-2.15]; p = 0.12). VKA use was associated with higher odds of both lobar (cases: 14.3%, controls: 6.1%; aOR 3.66 [2.78-4.80]) and nonlobar (cases: 15.4%, controls: 5.5%; aOR 4.62 [3.67-5.82]) s-ICH. The association of DOAC use with lobar s-ICH (cases: 3.5%, controls: 2.7%; aOR 1.66 [1.02-2.70]) was weaker than that of VKA use (p = 0.006). Corresponding estimates for nonlobar s-ICH were not different between DOACs (cases: 5.1%, controls: 2.4%; aOR 3.44 [2.33-5.08]) and VKAs (p = 0.20). Antithrombotics were associated with higher risks of s-ICH, but the strength of the associations varied by s-ICH location and drug, which may reflect differences in the cerebral microangiopathies associated with lobar vs nonlobar hemorrhages and the mechanisms of drug action.

Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed for life-long anticoagulation in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients, despite not being recommended in the guidelines. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in CTEPH patients. MethodsFrom May 2013 to December 2022, patients who were first diagnosed with CTEPH in Fuwai Hospital and started long-term anticoagulation treatment with warfarin or DOACs were retrospectively included and followed up until (1) death, (2) transition to other kinds of anticoagulants, or (3) discontinuation of anticoagulation. Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding bias of baseline characteristics. All-cause death, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence were obtained and analysed. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 115 patients taking warfarin and 206 patients taking DOACs were included in our study and followed up for 5.5 [3.4, 7.1] years. There was no significant difference of survival between the warfarin and the DOAC group (p = 0.77). The exposure adjusted event rate of major bleeding (0.3 %/person-year vs 0.4 %/person-year, p = 0.705) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (3.1 %/person-year vs 3.2 %/person-year, p > 0.999) was similar between two groups. The exposure adjusted rate of VTE recurrence was significantly higher in the DOAC group (1.5 %/person-year vs 0.3 %/person-year, p = 0.030). ConclusionIn anticoagulation of CTEPH patients, DOACs have similar survival rate, similar risk of bleeding but higher risk of VTE recurrence than warfarin.

Echocardiographic Parameters of Left Atrial Structure and Function and Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - The ANAFIE Echocardiographic Substudy.

This prospective ANAFIE Registry substudy investigated the relationship between the echocardiographic parameters of left atrial (LA) structure and function and clinical outcomes at 2 years among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients aged ≥75 years. Outcomes of 1,474 elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography at baseline were analyzed by categories of maximum LA volume index (max. LAVi) and LA emptying fraction (LAEF) total. Baseline mean±standard deviation LAEF total and max. LAVi were 28.2±14.9% and 54.2±25.9 mL/m2, respectively. Proportions of oral anticoagulant (OAC), direct OAC, and warfarin use were 92.7%, 68.7%, and 24.0%, respectively. Patients with LAEF total ≤45.0% (n=1,213) vs. >45.0% (n=224) were at higher risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.19, P=0.021) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (HR: 2.25, P=0.045). Risk of all-cause death was higher with max. LAVi >48.0 mL/m2(n=656) vs. ≤48.0 mL/m2(n=621) (HR: 1.69, P=0.048). Subgroups with abnormal LA function and structure had increased incidence of cardiac/cardiovascular events and HF hospitalization. No significant interaction was observed between echocardiographic parameters and OAC type. Elderly Japanese patients with NVAF and LAEF total ≤45.0% were at higher risk of cardiovascular events and HF hospitalization, and those with max. LAVi >48.0 mL/m2were at higher risk of all-cause death.

Strategies of anticoagulant therapy in various clinical variants of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune pathology characterized by thrombotic manifestation associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and phospholipid-binding proteins circulation. Long-term anticoagulant therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment and prevention of relapses and manifestations of APS-associated For high-risk APS phenotypes with arterial thrombosis, microthrombosis and triple aPL-positivity VKA use is the only possible option for anticoagulant therapy. The need for constant monitoring of international normalized relations (INR) for achievement and control of target values, intolerance and variability of INR reduce patient compliance in a certain category of patients, which limits their use in some clinical situations. Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is an alternative option for anticoagulant therapy. Despite the benefits of using DOAC according to current international recommendations and guidelines their use is limited by the phenotype of APS with venous thrombosis and monoand double aPL-positivity if the patient is unable or unwilling to take VKA due to need for constant INR monitoring. In the obstetric version of APS during gestation, antithrombotic therapy is performed with aspirin and low molecular-weight heparins. The intensity and duration of antithrombotic prophylaxis determining at high-risk APS is a real challenge for the clinician due to the lack of tools for risk stratification and should be carried out depending on the individual characteristics of the patient and the course of APS.

Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Rehabilitation: A Review and Practice Suggestions.

Venous thromboembolism is a frequent complication of acute hospital care, and this extends to inpatient rehabilitation. The timely use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in patients who are at risk is a strong, evidence-based patient safety priority that has reduced clinically important venous thromboembolism, associated mortality and costs of care. While there has been extensive research on optimal approaches to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acute care, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence specific to patients in the rehabilitation setting, and there are no clinical practice guidelines that make recommendations for (or against) thromboprophylaxis across the broad spectrum of rehabilitation patients. Herein, we provide an evidence-informed review of the topic with practice suggestions. We conducted a series of literature searches to assess the risks of venous thromboembolism and its prevention related to inpatient rehabilitation as well as in major rehabilitation subgroups. Mobilization alone does not eliminate the risk of venous thromboembolism after another thrombotic insult. Low molecular weight heparins and direct oral anticoagulants are the principal current modalities of thromboprophylaxis. Based on the literature, we make suggestions for venous thromboembolism prevention and include an approach for consideration by rehabilitation units that can be aligned with local practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Anticoagulant Therapy Early After Surgical Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement: Rationale and Design of the ENBALV Trial.

Anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists is recommended within 3 to 6 months after bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent thromboembolic events. However, data regarding whether direct oral anticoagulants can be an alternative to warfarin in such patients are limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin within 3 months after bioprosthetic valve replacement. The ENBALV trial is an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study. It involves patients aged 18 to 85 years undergoing bioprosthetic valve replacement at the aortic and/or mitral position. They are randomized 1:1 to receive either edoxaban or warfarin. Administration of edoxaban or warfarin is to be continued for 12 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome is the occurrence rate of stroke or systemic embolism at 12 weeks after surgery. The net clinical outcome is a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding, which is included in the secondary outcomes. The ENBALV trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients early after bioprosthetic valve replacement, including patients with sinus rhythm, which will bring a significant benefit to patients in clinical practice. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) 2051210209. 30 Mar 2022 https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2051210209 .

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease

Direct oral anticoagulant therapy in adolescent venous thromboembolism: A systematic review.

Adolescent venous thromboembolism (VTE) has unique challenges in management, complications, and compliance to anticoagulants. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for pediatric VTE management, with an increasing use especially in adolescents. Primary objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in adolescent VTE. Secondary objectives include adverse events, bleeding events, and overall mortality. A SR protocol was registered in PROSPERO 2022 (CRD42022363928). Databases were searched from inception to September 22, 2022. Studies with children aged 10-18years, VTE diagnosis, DOAC therapy, randomized control trials (RCTs), cohort, and relevant study types were included. Studies including prophylaxis, non-DOAC therapy, arterial thrombosis, age outliers, non-relevant study types were excluded. Findings are reported in accordance to PRISMA 2020. Nine reports from five studies, published between 2016 and 2022, were included. Rivaroxaban was the most common DOAC. VTE recurrence was 0.02% in the rivaroxaban phase III trial and one patient in the dabigatran phase IIb/III trial. Complete/partial thrombus resolution (CR/PR) was 76.6% in the rivaroxaban phase III trial, and 83.9% in the dabigatran phase IIb/III trial. CR/PR was found to be 68.4% in Dhaliwal etal. study and 83.3% in Hassan etal. study. Major bleeding occurred in one patient. Headache and gastrointestinal symptoms were commonly seen. All-cause mortality occurred in a patient due to cancer progression. DOAC therapy in adolescent VTE had CR/PR in two-thirds of the patients, with low incidence of VTE recurrence and major bleeding. As there are only two randomized controlled trial (RCTs), future adolescents' studies are required to validate our results.

The Role of Viscoelastic Testing in Assessing Hemostasis: A Challenge to Standard Laboratory Assays?

Viscoelastic testing is increasingly being used in clinical and research settings to assess hemostasis. Indeed, there are potential situations in which viscoelastic testing is reportedly superior to standard routine laboratory testing for hemostasis. We report the current testing platforms and terminology, as well as providing a concise narrative review of the published evidence to guide its use in various clinical settings. Notably, there is increasing evidence of the potential utility of viscoelastic testing for assessment of direct oral anticoagulants, and bleeding associated with chronic liver disease, orthotopic liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, trauma, obstetrics and pediatrics.

Fatal spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage in association with apixaban: A case report

We present the case of an 80-year-old gentleman with a spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage secondary to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medication. As far as we are aware this is the third documented case of spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage in association with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) therapy. Previously published cases have also cited apixaban as the associated DOAC. With their increasing prevalence, spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage should be a recognized presentation for the patient in extremis on DOAC therapy.

Dedicated anticoagulation management protocols in fragility femoral fracture care – a source of significant variance and limited effectiveness in improving time to surgery: The hip and femoral fracture anticoagulation surgical timing evaluation (HASTE) study

IntroductionApproximately 20 % of femoral fragility fracture patients take anticoagulants, typically warfarin or Direct Oral AntiCoagulant (DOAC). These can impact timing of surgery affecting patient survival. Due to several possible approaches and numerous factors to consider in the preoperative workup of anticoagulated patients, potential for variations in clinical practice exist. Some hospitals employ dedicated anticoagulation management protocols to address this issue, and to improve time to surgery. This study aimed to determine the proportion of hospitals with such protocols, compare protocol guidance between hospitals, and evaluate the effectiveness of protocols in facilitating prompt surgery. MethodsData was prospectively collected through a collaborative, multicentre approach involving hospitals across the UK. Femoral fragility fracture patients aged ≥60 years and admitted to hospital between 1st May to 31st July 2023 were included. Information from dedicated anticoagulation management protocols were collated on several domains relating to perioperative care including administration of reversal agents and instructions on timing of surgery as well as others. Logistic regression was used to evaluate effects of dedicated protocols on time to surgery. ResultsDedicated protocols for management of patients taking warfarin and DOACs were present at 41 (52.6 %) and 43 (55.1 %) hospitals respectively. For patients taking warfarin, 39/41 (95.1 %) protocols specified the dose of vitamin k and the most common was 5 milligrams intravenously (n=21). INR threshold values for proceeding to surgery varied between protocols; 1.5 (n=28), 1.8 (n=6), and 2 (n=6). For patients taking DOACs, 35/43 (81.4 %) and 8/43 (18.6 %) protocols advised timing of surgery based on renal function and absolute time from last dose respectively. Analysis of 10,197 patients from 78 hospitals showed fewer patients taking DOACs received surgery within 36 h of admission at hospitals with a dedicated protocol compared to those without (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54–0.99, p=0.040), while there were no differences among patients taking warfarin (adjusted OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.75–3.57, p=0.219). ConclusionsAround half of hospitals employed a dedicated anticoagulation management protocol for femoral fragility fracture patients, and substantial variation was observed in guidance between protocols. Dedicated protocols currently being used at hospitals were ineffective at improving the defined targets for time to surgery.

Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Preventing Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Patients with atrial fibrillation and concurrent liver cirrhosis have been excluded from major clinical trials evaluating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) due to safety concerns. This has led to uncertainty regarding the optimal anticoagulant therapy in this population at high risk of thromboembolic events. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver cirrhosis. Databases including Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies. The primary effectiveness outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the safety outcome was major bleeding events. A total of 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to VKAs, the use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.92, p=0.005). The risk of all-cause mortality was comparable between the two groups (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-1.07, p=0.23). Notably, DOACs demonstrated a significantly lower risk of major bleeding events (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61-0.73, p<0.01) compared to VKAs. This meta-analysis suggests that DOACs may be a favorable alternative to VKAs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver cirrhosis, with a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding. However, further research is needed to establish optimal dosing strategies and assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with advanced liver disease.

EE46 An Early Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abelacimab Versus Rivaroxaban, a Standard of Care Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC), in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Preliminary Results from the AZALEA-TIMI 71 Trial

EE46 An Early Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abelacimab Versus Rivaroxaban, a Standard of Care Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC), in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Preliminary Results from the AZALEA-TIMI 71 Trial

EPH140 Comparative Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Low-Molecular Weight Heparins in Cancer Associated Thrombosis

EPH140 Comparative Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Low-Molecular Weight Heparins in Cancer Associated Thrombosis