Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Research Articles

To bridge or not to bridge: the role of intravenous thrombolysis in mechanical thrombectomy for large cerebral infarctions through a two-center cohort study and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe effectiveness and safety of intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large cerebral infarctions remains uncertain. This study compares bridging MT, which includes intravenous thrombolysis, to direct MT without it. MethodsData from 298 patients with anterior circulation large cerebral infarctions, assessed via non-enhanced CT (ASPECTS 0-5), who underwent MT in two-center cohort studies, were analyzed. Primary outcomes focused on independent ambulation (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-3) at 90 days post-stroke. Safety outcomes included parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) rates and mortality. We conducted a sensitivity analysis considering the timing from symptom onset to imaging within 4.5 hours. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 3527 patients assessed the interventions' effectiveness and safety, with further scrutiny of high-quality studies (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale ratings 7-9) to increase robustness of results. ResultsNo significant differences were found in 90-day independent ambulation between the bridging MT and the direct MT group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.15, 95% CI 0.68-1.94). Rates of PH and mortality were also similar across groups. These outcomes were consistent in the subgroup imaged within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. The meta-analysis supported these outcomes, showing no improvement in ambulation (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.64) or reduction in PH with bridging MT. Further analysis of high-quality studies supported these results. ConclusionsThe cohort study and meta-analysis provide Class II evidence indicating no significant differences in functional outcomes or hemorrhagic risks between bridging and direct MT for large cerebral infarctions. This suggests that direct MT might be a viable alternative to bridging MT.

Safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in different age groups of acute ischemic stroke patients.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus direct MT in different age groups of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation. Consecutive patients from the prospective endovascular stroke registry of the Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy, between January 2015 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into age groups (≤ 80 years old and > 80 years old); for each age group, they were further divided in the bridging therapy group and the direct MT group. We performed a propensity score analysis according to baseline characteristics. Safety outcomes were any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) and 3-month mortality. Efficacy outcomes were successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, mTICI, score ≥ 2b) and 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, mRS, ≤ 2). We included 761 AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO (mean age 73.5 ± 12.8 years; 44.8% males; mean baseline NIHSS 16 ± 5). After propensity score, there were 365 patients ≤ 80 years old (52% bridging therapy) and 187 patients > 80 years old (57% bridging therapy). In both age groups of patients, we found no statistically significant differences in the rates of any ICH, sICH, successful recanalization and 3-month mortality and functional independence between bridging therapy and direct MT groups. In our population, safety and efficacy outcomes of bridging therapy versus direct MT did not differ in both AIS patients ≤ 80 and > 80 years old.

Bridging the Gap: Improving Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes with Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Current guidelines recommend intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). This combined approach, known as bridging therapy (BT), is believed to increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome when administered within 4.5 h of symptom onset. However, the benefits of BT over direct mechanical thrombectomy (d-MT) remain debated. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of AIS-LVO patients undergoing MT within 6 h of symptom onset, with and without prior IVT. Within the prospective Transzlációs Idegtudományi Nemzeti Laboratórium (TINL) STROKE-registry, AIS-LVO patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, University of Pécs between February 2023 and June 2024 were investigated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reaching functional independence at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. Secondary endpoints included clinical improvement at 72 h (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of ≤1 or a change from baseline [ΔNIHSS] of ≥4) and successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score ≥ 2). Safety outcomes were evaluated based on thrombus migration and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Results were compared using linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline variables. Of 82 patients, 51 (62.2%) received BT, while 31 (37.8%) underwent d-MT. The BT group showed a significantly higher rate of functional independence (45.7% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.014) and a lower 90-day mortality rate (13.7% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis revealed that IVT was independently associated with favorable functional outcomes (p = 0.011) and reduced mortality (p = 0.021). No significant differences were observed in terms of clinical improvement at 72 h, successful recanalization, thrombus migration, or hemorrhagic transformation between the groups. This study supports current guidelines recommending BT for thrombectomy-eligible AIS-LVO patients, offering new insights into the ongoing clinical debate.

Direct mechanical thrombectomy with or without thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

Direct mechanical thrombectomy with or without thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

Eclipse balloon-assisted straight sinus thrombectomy: A novel technique.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis comprises 0.5% of all strokes and usually affects young adults. Straight sinus involvement is relatively rare, and it is associated with poor prognosis. Intravenous anticoagulation is considered the first line of treatment. Endovascular approaches such as direct catheter thrombolysis, balloon-assisted thrombolysis, and mechanical thrombectomy may be more efficient and should be considered in cases in which there is involvement of the deep venous system, declining neurological status, or less invasive treatment options have failed. In this work, we describe a novel technique of ECLIPSE 2L balloon (Balt, Irvine, CA) assisted mechanical thrombectomy for straight sinus thrombosis and a review of dural sinus thrombosis management.

Initial experience with the ambulatory management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with May-Thurner syndrome with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty and stenting

ObjectivePatients undergoing intervention for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) typically require inpatient (IP) hospitalization for initial treatment with anticoagulation and management with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. Direct oral anticoagulants and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) devices offer the opportunity for outpatient (OP) management. We describe our approach with these patients. MethodsPatients receiving intervention for acute IFDVT from January 2020 through October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing unilateral thrombectomy, venous angioplasty, and stenting for IFDVT with MTS comprised the study population and were divided into two groups: (1) patients admitted to the hospital and treated as IPs and (2) patients who underwent therapy as OPs. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural success, complications, and follow-up. ResultsA total of 92 patients were treated for IFDVT with thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting of whom 58 comprised the IP group and 34 the OP group. All 92 patients underwent PMT using the Inari ClotTriever (Inari Medical), intravascular ultrasound, angioplasty, and stenting with 100% technical success. Three patients in the IP group required adjuvant thrombolysis. There was no difference in primary patency of the treated IFDVT segment at 12 months between the two groups (IP, 73.5%; OP, 86.7%; P = .21, log-rank test). ConclusionsPatients with acute IFDVT and MTS deemed appropriate for thrombectomy and iliac revascularization can be managed with initiation of ambulatory direct oral anticoagulant therapy and subsequent return for ambulatory PMT, angioplasty, and stenting. This approach avoids the expense of IP care and allows for effective use of resources at a time when staffing and supply chain shortages have led to inefficiencies in the provision of IP care for nonemergent conditions.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Increases the First Pass Effect for Large Vessel Occlusion Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy

Background It remains unclear whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) influences the incidence of the first pass effect (FPE) in patients with acute large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Therefore, this study investigated the effects of IVT on FPE in patients treated with MT. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of the SKIP (Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute LVO Stroke) study, which was an investigator‐initiated, multicenter, randomized, open‐label clinical trial performed in 23 hospital networks in Japan from January 1, 2017, to July 31, 2019. Among 204 patients, 24 were excluded because they did not undergo MT. Patients treated with MT alone were compared with those treated with MT+IVT for the incidence of FPE (achieving a modified treatment in cerebral ischemia score of 2c or 3 after the first MT pass). Additional subgroup analyses were performed to investigate factors more closely related to the association between IVT and FPE. Results Among the 180 patients, 91 were treated with MT alone and 89 were treated with MT+IVT. FPE was achieved in 56 patients (31.1%). The incidence of FPE was significantly higher in patients treated with MT+IVT than in those treated with MT alone (39.3% versus 23.0%, respectively; P =0.02). In the subgroup analyses, IVT markedly increased FPE in female patients and tended to increase FPE in patients with first‐segment middle cerebral artery distal occlusion and onset to hospital arrival time >100 minutes. Conclusion IVT using alteplase increased the incidence of FPE in Japanese patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with MT. Trial Registration : Trial registration umin.ac.jp/ctr identifier: UMIN000021488

Successful mechanical thrombectomy in acute bilateral M1 middle cerebral artery occlusion: a case report and literature review

BackgroundAcute bilateral occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is a very rare condition, and most cases are accompanied by a poor prognosis. However, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for bilateral MCA is challenging. Here, we report a case of acute unilateral MCA occlusion with sequential acute occlusion of the bilateral MCA during intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We urgently performed bilateral MT of the MCA and effective recanalization.Case presentationThe patient is a 73-year-old man who complained of a sudden adverse influence on speech and an inability to move his left limb for 2 h. He had a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, but had never used any anticoagulants before. Head and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed embolism in the right M1 MCA. During intravenous alteplase thrombolytic therapy, the patient suddenly became unconscious. Cerebral angiography showed occlusion of the M1 segment of the bilateral MCA in the patients. MT of the bilateral MCA was performed using a combination of a stent retriever and an aspiration catheter with mTici 3 revascularization. On the second day, the patient became conscious, although he had remaining symptoms of speech insufficiency and weakness of the left limb. The mRS score was 2 90 days after the operation.ConclusionsAcute bilateral occlusion of the M1 segment of the MCA is extremely rare and is accompanied by high morbidity and high mortality. Intravenous alteplase thrombolysis can increase the risk of atrial thrombus shedding in patients with atrial fibrillation, so patients with acute bilateral MCA occlusion in the M1 segment chose direct MT or bridging therapy, which remains controversial, and the sequence of MT remains to be discussed. Nevertheless, early endovascular treatment can decrease the morbidity and mortality of such patients.

Abstract Number ‐ 176: Mechanical thrombectomy with or without bridging in stroke: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of RCTs

Introduction Current published guidelines and meta‐analyses comparing direct mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone versus MT with bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) suggested that MT alone is non‐inferior to MT with bridging thrombolysis in achieving favorable functional outcome. Because of this controversy, we aimed to systematically update the evidence and meta‐analyze data from randomized trials comparing MT alone versus MT with bridging thrombolysis. Methods We searched MEDLINE (through Ovid), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 14, 2021 without any language restrictions to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post‐hoc analyses of RCTs comparing direct MT with or without bridging IVT in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke secondary to a large vessel occlusion. We conducted meta‐analyses using random‐effects models to compare the rates for favorable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale [mRS] score of 0 to 2) and mortality at 90 days, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), between MT and MT with IVT. We also assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool (RoB) and the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Of 11,111 citations, we identified 53 eligible studies, and included 8 studies with a total of 3,008 participants. We found low‐certainty evidence suggesting that there is probably a small increase in the proportion of patients with favorable functional outcome with an mRS of 0 to 2 at 90 days for those who underwent MT with IVT compared to those with MT alone (risk ratio [RR] 1.08, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.19); moderate‐certainty evidence that there is probably a small decrease in mortality at 90 days for patients with MT plus IVT compared to MT alone (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.03); and very low‐certainty evidence that there is possibly an increase in sICH for patients with MT plus IVT compared to MT alone (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.61). When we restricted the analyses to RCTs only, we found no significant differences in favorable functional outcome (RR 2.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13), mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14), or sICH (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.70). Conclusions Low‐certainty evidence shows that there is probably a small increase in the proportion of patients with favorable functional outcome, moderate‐certainty evidence shows that there is probably a small decrease in mortality, and very low‐certainty evidence that there is possibly an increase in sICH for patients with MT plus IVT compared to MT alone.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients in A "Stroke Belt" Region of Southern Europe.

The aim of this 4-year observational study is to analyze the outcomes of stroke patients treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) compared to bridging therapy (BT) (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] + BT) based on 3-month outcomes, in real clinical practice in the "Stroke Belt" of Southern Europe. In total, 300 patients were included (41.3% dMT and 58.6% BT). The frequency of direct referral to the stroke center was similar in the dMT and BT group, whereas the time from onset to groin was longer in the BT group (median 210 [IQR 160-303] vs. 399 [IQR 225-675], p = 0.001). Successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) and hemorrhagic transformation were similar in both groups. The BT group more frequently showed excellent outcomes at 3 months (32.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that BT was independently associated with excellent outcomes (OR 2.7. 95% CI,1.2-5.9, p = 0.02) and lower mortality (OR 0.36. 95% CI 0.16-0.82, p = 015). Conclusions: Compared with dMT, BT was associated with excellent functional outcomes and lower 3-month mortality in this real-world clinical practice study conducted in a region belonging to the "Stroke Belt" of Southern Europe. Given the disparity of results on the benefit of BT in the current evidence, it is of vital importance to analyze the convenience of its use in each health area.

Efficacy and safety of bridging therapy and direct mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions: a meta-analysis.

Efficacy and safety of bridging therapy and direct mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions: a meta-analysis.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The current guideline recommends using an intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in eligible acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO). Some recent studies found no significant differences in the long-term functional outcomes between bridging therapy (BT, i.e., IV tPA prior to MT) and direct MT (dMT). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and functional outcomes between BT and dMT in AIS patients with ELVO who were eligible for IV tPA administration. Based on the ELVO location, patients were categorized as the anterior group (occlusion of the anterior circulation), or the combined group (occlusion of the anterior and/or posterior circulation). A subgroup analysis was performed based on the study type, i.e., RCT and non-RCT. Thirteen studies (3985 patients) matched the eligibility criteria. Comparing the BT and dMT groups, no significant differences in terms of mortality and good functional outcome were observed at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic (sICH) events were more frequent in BT patients in the combined group (OR = 0.73, p = 0.02); this result remained significant only in the non-RCT subgroup (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03). The RCT subgroup had a significantly higher rate of successful revascularization in BT patients (OR = 0.73, p = 0.02). Our meta-analysis uncovered no significant differences in functional outcome and mortality rate at 90 days between dMT and BT in patients with AIS who had ELVO. Although BT performed better in terms of successful recanalization rate, there is a risk of increased sICH rate in this group.

A comparison of low- versus standard-dose bridging alteplase in acute ischemic stroke mechanical thrombectomy using indirect methods.

Whether low-dose alteplase is similar to standard-dose bridging alteplase prior to endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of low- versus standard-dose bridging alteplase therapy (BT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 4.5 h after onset. We conducted an indirect comparison of low- versus standard-dose bridging alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy in AIS of current available clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared direct mechanical thrombectomy treatment (dMT) to BT. Primary efficacy outcomes were functional independence and excellent recovery defined as a dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 and 0-1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We included six RCTs of 2334 AIS patients in this analysis, including one trial using low-dose bridging alteplase (n = 103) and five trials using standard-dose bridging alteplase (n = 1067) against a common comparator (dMT). Indirect comparisons of low- to standard-dose bridging alteplase yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.47-1.50) for 90-day mRS 0-2, 1.18 (95% CI 0.65-2.12) for 90-day mRS 0-1, 1.21 (95% CI 0.44-3.36) for mortality, and 1.11 (95% CI 0.39-3.14) for successful recanalization. There were no significant differences in the odds for sICH (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.32-3.41) or any ICH (OR 1.71, 95% CI 0.94-3.10) between low- and standard-dose bridging alteplase. Indirect evidence shows that the effects of low- and standard-dose bridging alteplase are similar for key efficacy and safety outcomes. Due to the wide confidence intervals, larger randomized trials comparing low- and standard-dose alteplase bridging therapy are required.

Thrombectomy with or without Bridging Thrombolysis for Anterior Circulation Stroke.

Currently, there is still no clear consensus on bridging thrombolysis (BT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In this study, we aimed to compare clinical and procedural outcomes and complication rates of BT versus direct mechanical thrombectomy (d-MT) in anterior circulation stroke. A total of 359 consecutive anterior circulation stroke patients who received d-MT or BT in our tertiary stroke center between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as Group d-MT (n = 210) and Group BT (n = 149). The primary outcome was the impact of BT on clinical and procedural outcomes, whereas the secondary outcome was the safety of BT. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher in the d-MT group (p = 0.010). The median duration of the procedure was significantly higher in Group d-MT than in Group BT (35 vs 27 min, respectively; P = 0.044). The number of patients achieving good and excellent outcomes was significantly higher in Group BT (p = 0.006 and P = 0.03). The edema/malign infarction rate was higher in the d-MT group (p = 0.003). Successful reperfusion, first-pass effects, symptomatic intra-cranial hemorrhage, and mortality rates were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). In this study, BT seems to yield better clinical and procedural outcomes with lower complication rates than d-MT. These findings may support the additional value of intravenous alteplase in anterior system strokes. Further large-scale, prospective, randomized-controlled studies will clarify the gray lines in this consensus, but this paper is important for reflecting the real-world data in developing countries.

A comparative study between direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation associated anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke

From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021, 94 patients who were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke and underwent mechanical thrombectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University were retrospectively collected, including 52 patients in the direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) group and 42 patients in the bridging therapy (BT) group. All patients received stent thrombectomy, and the BT group received intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase within 4.5 hours.There were no significant differences in 7 d National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score[12.0 (5.2, 42.0) vs 10.0 (6.0, 25.8)], incidence of hemorrhage transformation [44.2%(23/52) vs 45.2%(19/42)], symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage[11.5%(6/52) vs 11.9%(5/42)],90 d mortality[34.6% (18/52) vs 38.1% (16/42)]between the two groups(all P>0.05). The rate of 90 d good prognosis in dMT and BT groups was 36.5% (19/52) and 35.7% (15/42), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant(OR=1.45, 95%CI: 0.39-3.37, P=0.805). The number of stent passes[2(1,3) vs 1(1,2)] and the vessel recanalization time [(81±41)min vs (57±29)min] in the BT subgroup of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion were longer than those in the dMT group (both P<0.05).Therefore, direct thrombectomy has similar efficacy and safety as bridging therapy in the treatment of AF related anterior circulation large vessel occlusive stroke, which is worthy of further research and verification.

Intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a dual centre retrospective cohort study

First pass effect (FPE) is a successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b) after the first trial of thrombectomy. It is associated with good functional outcomes. Few studies discussed the effect of BT (bridging therapy: combined I.V. thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy) on FPE and clinical outcomes. In our study, we would like to report the effect of MT with or without preceding IVT on FPE and the functional outcome of AIS (Acute Ischemic Stroke) of anterior circulation in real practice. A dual-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 201 patients with AIS of anterior circulation and was divided into a bridging therapy (BT) group of 150 patients who received alteplase preceding thrombectomy, and a direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) group of 51 patients. Comparisons between both groups regarding the clinical and radiological outcome. Early better clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at day seven with BT group (39.3%) rather than dMT (23.5%) with P value = 0.044. No significant differences as regard puncture to revascularization time, successful revascularization (mTICI) ≥ 2b and FPE between both groups (P value: 0.328, 0.538, and 0.708, respectively). No differences as regards hemorrhagic transformation, mortality rate, and 90-day favorable outcome between both groups (P value 0.091, 0.089, and 0.192, respectively). BT might have better early outcome than dMT but no difference as regards 90-day favorable outcomes, mortality, sICH, FPE, recanalization rate and procedure time. It might be reasonable to go directly to mechanical thrombectomy without IVT for AIS with large vessel occlusion.

Mild and moderate cardioembolic stroke patients may benefit more from direct mechanical thrombectomy than bridging therapy: A subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial (DIRECT-MT).

The benefit of intravenous alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy is unclear in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke. We collected cardioembolic (CE) stroke patient data from the multicentre randomized clinical trial of Direct Intra-arterial Thrombectomy to Revascularize Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals (DIRECT-MT). The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Five subgroups of cardioembolic stroke patients were analyzed. A multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis analyzed the difference in the primary outcome between the direct mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and bridging therapy groups. An interaction term was entered into the model to test for subgroup interaction. The DIRECT-MT trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03469206. A total of 290 CE stroke patients from the DIRECT-MT trial were enrolled in this study: 146 patients in the direct MT group and 144 patients in the bridging therapy group. No difference between the two treatment groups in the primary outcome was found (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.218; 95% confidence interval, 0.806 to 1.841; P = 0.34). In the subgroup analysis, CE stroke patients with an NIHSS ≤ 15 in the direct MT group were associated with better outcomes (47 vs. 53, acOR, 3.14 [1.497, 6.585]) and lower mortality (47 vs. 53, aOR, 0.16 [0.026, 0.986]) than those in the bridging therapy group, while there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the outcome and mortality of CE stroke patients with an NIHSS >15. Mild and moderate cardioembolic stroke patients may benefit more from direct mechanical thrombectomy than bridging therapy. This need to be confirmed by further prospective studies in a larger number of patients.

Bridging thrombolysis improves survival rates at 90 days compared with direct mechanical thrombectomy alone in acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1096 patients

BackgroundMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from basilar artery occlusion (BAO).ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of MT, with and without bridging intravenous...

Predictive Factors for Clinical Outcome After Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Within 4.5 h.

BackgroundRecent trials including DIRECT-MT, DEVT, and SKIP have found that direct mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is equally effective as the combination of MT and intravenous thrombolysis. However, the results of the other trials, namely MR-CLEAN NO-IV and the SWIFT-DIRECT trial have failed to confirm the non-inferiority of direct MT vs. the combination therapy.AimWe aimed to identify prognostic factors of direct MT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 4.5 h.Materials and MethodsData from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Adult patients with confirmed anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 4.5 h of onset with baseline NIHSS of ≥6 and baseline ASPECTS of ≥6 treated using direct MT within 6 h were recruited.ResultsA total of 140 patients were enrolled in the study with a median age of 65.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 59–76.5], median baseline NIHSS of 13.5 (IQR, 11–16), and median baseline ASPECTS of 8 (IQR, 7–8). Direct MT was feasible in all patients (100%). Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) was achieved in 124/140 patients (88.6%) with a low rate of complications (8/140, 5.7%). Any type of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH occurred in 44/140 (31.4%) and 5/140 (3.6%), respectively. Overall, a good outcome (mRS 0–2) was achieved in 93/140 (66.4%), and the mortality rate was 9.3% (13/140 patients). Using multivariate analysis, lower age [odds ratio (OR), 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92–1.00; P = 0.05], low baseline NIHSS (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74–0.92; P = 0.00), and absence of ICH (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10–0.81; P = 0.02) were independently associated with favorable outcome. Independent predictors of mortality were baseline NIHSS (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01–1.46; P = 0.04), successful reperfusion (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00–0.58; P = 0.02), and ICH (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02–0.75; P = 0.02). Further analysis showed that the median mRS at 90 days was significantly better in the MCA occlusion group compared to the ICA plus M1 occlusion group [1 (IQR 0–3) vs. 2 (IQR 1–4); P = 0.05].ConclusionsOur findings suggest that direct thrombectomy may be an adequate clinical option for younger patients (≤70) experiencing proximal middle artery occlusion within 4.5 h and who have low baseline NIHSS (≤14).

Impact of Increasing Aspiration Catheter Size and Refinement of Technique: Experience of Over 1000 Strokes Treated With ADAPT.

We present longitudinal data regarding the outcomes and evolution of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) using a direct aspiration first pass technique. To evaluate the impact of increasing aspiration catheter size. This is a planned analysis of a prospective cohort study that enrolled all patients who underwent a direct aspiration first pass technique MT in a comprehensive stroke center from January 2013 to December 2020. We did exploratory analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of patients who had intracranial internal carotid artery or M1 segment of middle cerebral artery occlusion based on the aspiration catheter bore size (small [041, 054, 058, and 060 inch] vs medium [0.064 and 0.068 inch] and medium vs large [0.071, 0.072, and 0.074 inch]). During the 8-year study period, a total of 1004 patients were included. Median age was 69 years, 49% were female patients, and 60.6% were White. Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation was observed in 47 patients (4.7%), and 366 patients (36.5%) achieved the modified Rankin scale of 0 to 2 at 90 days after the stroke. For patients with intracranial internal carotid artery or M1 occlusion, medium-bore aspiration catheters were more likely to achieve successful recanalization after first aspiration attempt (63.9% vs 51.4%, P = .015) and had a faster groin-to-reperfusion time (16 vs 20 minutes, P = .001) when compared with small-bore catheters. However, these differences were not significant when comparing medium-bore with large-bore catheters. Medium-bore catheters had better performance measures compared with small-bore catheters. However, large-bore catheters did not show significantly better performance results that suggest a plateau effect.