Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), an electrical device with high energy conversion efficiency and zero-carbon emission, has attracted more attention. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) is the core component of PEMFCs, mainly including proton exchange membrane (PEM), catalyst layer (CL), microporous layer (MPL) and carbon fiber gas diffusion layer (GDL), which has different structures and significantly affects its power density and durability [1].Generally, MEA is fabricated by catalyst coated electrodes (CCE) and catalyst coated membrane (CCM) methods, which often results in a huge interface resistance between electrode and membrane, the weak adhesion and poor proton and electron transfer, limiting the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) and the power density of PEMFCs [2].To solve this problem, many approaches have been adopted, such as improving sintering temperature for MEA, incorporating a guided cracked layer between cathode and membrane, double-layered catalyst and direct deposition method. Zhao et al prepared an integrated membrane electrode assembly structure to reduce the contact resistance between proton exchange membrane and catalyst layer, which significantly improves the efficiency and stability of water electrolysis [4]. At the same time, Klingele and Breitwieser developed a direct deposition of proton exchange membrane technology to improve high performance and long-term stability of PEMFCs. However, these methods are complex and almost impossible to industrialize [5].In this study, integrated membrane electrode assembly (I-MEA) was prepared by combining casting and doctor blade method techniques. The results show that the casting method is more suitable for fabricating I-MEALT in low-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. The power density of the I-MEALT cell is increased by 18% compared with that of the conventional MEALT (Fig. 1). The doctor blade method is more suitable for preparing I-MEAHT in high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. The maximum power density of I-MEAHT is increased by about 57% compared with that of the conventional MEAHT. The electrochemical impedance shows that this is mainly attributed to the reduced interface resistance between the electrode and the membrane, which facilitates the proton transfer.