Direct Composite Resin Research Articles

Evolution of the Guided Direct Composite Resin Technique in Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review aims to understand the limitations and benefits of the guided direct restorative technique, to optimize the final outcomes, considering the evolution from analog to digital, including planning, the diversification of guides, and the different resins employed. A search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane, and through manual searches, initiated in May 2023 and updated in April 2024. The following search strategy was used: ((injectable composite resin) OR (direct pressed composite)) OR (3D-guided), utilizing the PICO framework. Initially, 739 articles were retrieved. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 studies were considered suitable for data extraction, including 12 in vitro studies and 21 case reports or technique descriptions. The articles focused on comparisons of techniques, flowable, heated, and conventional resins, as well as various technique reports with variations in guides, materials, and planning, potentially aiding clinicians in more effective and safer execution of this restorative technique. The utilization of digital workflows presents greater solutions to the challenges of the guided direct restorative technique. Understanding the properties of the resins used is crucial for the results and should be chosen according to the patient's needs. A guided direct restorative procedure can deliver previously planned dental treatment based on individualized planning. This method ensures greater reproducibility in aesthetics and occlusion, resulting in superior quality work for the patient.

Reabilitação estética de dente conóide: relato de caso

As aesthetics advance in modern dentistry, people's expectations of their smiles become ever higher. Microdontia or conoid tooth, which refers to teeth smaller than normal, is one of the abnormalities that causes major aesthetic complaints due to its characteristics. Conoid teeth have a prevalence of 0.6 to 9.9%, with conical upper lateral teeth affecting approximately 55,000 people, with women being more susceptible than men. Many factors must be considered when restoring anterior teeth, depending on patient expectations and dental practice. The direct composite resin technique has stood out for providing aesthetic benefits, preserving tooth structure, being performed in a single consultation, being cheaper and not requiring any laboratory process. The objective of this study was to report a clinical case of aesthetic rehabilitation in a conoid tooth in the upper left lateral incisor with composite resin restoration using the direct technique. Clinical planning is essential for choosing the technique and restorative material to be used. Despite the various techniques proposed for the treatment of conoid lateral incisors, the aesthetic reanatomization with a direct veneer of composite resin, with diagnostic waxing, used in this study, was effective and inexpensive, allowing a minimally invasive treatment and possible posterior adjustments, enabling the restoration of self-esteem and the harmony of the patient's smile.

Fechamento de diastemas com faceta direta de resina composta: relato de caso

The search for an aesthetic standard is increasingly frequent and restoring a harmonious smile represents a real challenge for restorative dentistry. Composite resins are aesthetic and adhesive materials that have received special attention for ensuring predictable and lasting results with minimal tooth sacrifice. The technique of making direct veneers is simple, but requires discretion and attention from its indication to the final stages of its execution. The procedure has high success rates and predictable results with desirable longevity for anterior teeth. The objective of this study was to present a clinical case of diastema closure with direct composite resin veneers on anterior teeth and maxillary first premolars, with the aid of diagnostic wax-up for better accuracy of work on anterior teeth. It is concluded that the application of the direct restorative technique allowed a fast, low, cost and less invasive treatment. Providing a satisfactory result, raising self-esteem and allowing a restoration of the patient's facial aesthetics.

Treatment Modalities of Uncomplicated Crown Fracture in Anterior Maxillary Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review.

Several treatment modalities have been used to restore crown fractures in case of uncomplicated crown fractures. Although many treatment modalities have been reported, there is no consensus on which one has the best results in terms of success and durability. This systematic review of treatment modalities in uncomplicated crown fractures aims to provide the most common and successful treatment modality for each patient's unique needs, balancing conservation, aesthetics, and long-term durability. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar) were searched for articles regarding treatment modalities in uncomplicated crown fractures in anterior maxillary teeth. Following the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 case reports, four case series, and two retrospective studies were selected for the review. These studies reported on fragment reattachment, direct composite resin, and veneers for the management of uncomplicated crown fractures. Fragment reattachment was the most preferred treatment modality, with milk, water, or sterile saline used as storage mediums. Direct composite restoration was preferred for missing or bad-shaped fragments or longevity. Veneers were given for aesthetic consideration and fracture resistance when the crown structure was majorly affected by the fracture. Fragment reattachment was favored in 63% of the articles included in the review followed by direct composite restoration in 26% of the articles. Venners were used in about 11% of the articles. Composites depicted a higher survival rate and a better outcome than fragment reattachment. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 week to 4 years, and all articles successfully re-established function and aesthetics, except for one tooth that required root canal treatment. Fragment reattachment, direct composite restoration, and veneers are successful treatment modalities in uncomplicated crown fractures of anterior teeth. The choice of treatment depends on various factors like availability of fragments, age, and financial condition of the patient. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42020153091.

Aesthetic rehabilitation of enamel hypoplasia with direct composite resin

Aesthetic rehabilitation of enamel hypoplasia with direct composite resin

Aeshetic restoration of peg laterals with direct composite resin

Aeshetic restoration of peg laterals with direct composite resin

Effects of stamp material and restoration depth on the accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp technique

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of different stamp materials and restoration depths on the accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp technique. MethodsEighty standard resin teeth were divided into four groups based on different stamp materials: flowable composite resin (FR), vinyl polydimethyl siloxane (VPS) for bite registration (VB), VPS for impression (VI) and transparent VPS (TV). Each material group was further divided into two subgroups based on restoration depth (1 and 2 mm; n = 10). Standardized Class I cavities were prepared and restored with the corresponding stamps. Pre- and post-treatment scans of each tooth were fitted using Geomagic Control X software, generating deviation distribution maps of the occlusal surface. The accuracy indicators, including mean height variation (MHV), root mean square (RMS), and proportions of height variation with different ranges (PHVrange), were recorded to evaluate the accuracy of restorations. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05). ResultsThe type of stamp material significantly affected all accuracy indicators, while restoration depth did not show a significant effect on any of the indicators. MHV values ranged from 29.70 ± 5.88 μm to 63.52 ± 9.58 μm, and RMS values ranged from 62.78 ± 8.76 μm to 101.79 ± 13.17 μm, displaying a trend of FR<VB<VI<TV. The FR groups had the highest PHV<0.05mm values (72.24 ± 3.40 % for 1 mm, 71.47 ± 8.54 % for 2 mm) and the lowest PHV>0.2mm values (0.70 ± 0.50 % for 1 mm, 0.94 ± 0.47 % for 2 mm). In contrast, the TV groups exhibited the lowest PHV<0.05mm values (59.69 ± 10.23 % for 1 mm, 59.67 ± 5.70 % for 2 mm), while the VI groups showed the highest PHV>0.2mm values (7.34 ± 1.58 % for 1 mm, 8.20 ± 3.16 % for 2 mm). ConclusionsThe accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp made of flowable composite resin was higher than that of all tested VPS materials, thereby reducing the need for occlusal adjustment and improving clinical efficiency. Besides, restoration depth had no significant impact on the accuracy of stamp technique, regardless of the stamp material used. Clinical significanceThe accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp technique with different stamp materials varies. The flowable composite resin stamp exhibits higher accuracy compared with VPS stamps, reducing the need for occlusal adjustments.

The survival and clinical performance of anterior composite resin restorations and posterior indirect and cast restorations used to treat generalised tooth wear

Objective To evaluate the survival and clinical performance of restorative materials used in the rehabilitation of generalised severe tooth wear within a UK NHS postgraduate teaching hospital.Methods The clinical performance of 527 restorations on 20 patients with generalised severe tooth wear was reviewed after a mean period of five years. Anterior teeth were restored with direct composite resin and posterior teeth with indirect restorations. The study used the modified United States Public Health Service criteria for restoration assessment. Survival of the restorations was analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.Results The sample included 20 participants: 13 men and 7 women, with a median age of 51.8 years (range: 33-73 years). The median survival time for all restorations was 11.3 years when major failures were considered and 5.9 years for restorations when all types of failure were considered. A median survival time of 5.9 years for composite resin restorations and over seven years for cast restorations was found when considering all failures. Composite resin restorations commonly failed as a result of fracture, wear and marginal discolouration. Factors significantly influencing restoration survival were the material used, aetiology, incisal relationship and tooth location. The biological complications associated with this treatment regime were rare. Patient satisfaction remained generally high, with greatest dissatisfaction related to treatment time.Conclusions The use of anterior composite resin with posterior indirect restorations to treat generalised severe tooth wear is a viable treatment modality with very few major complications.

Restorative Management of Microdontia - A Case Report

“Conical tooth anomaly” is defined as those anomalies associated with volumes and shapes of the teeth, and as the malformation in which dental crowns are similar with cone and shape bluntly and in which mesiodistal crown size is smaller than cervical size. Although many treatment options are adopted for regaining the aesthetic structure and functions in such individuals, direct and indirect options are generally preferred. In this case report we have presented a patients presenting with “conical tooth anomaly” following the clinical and diagnosis of th is patient treated with direct composite resin.

Evaluation of direct restorations for pit-and-fissure caries using stamp combined with single-shade composite resin technique: A 12-month follow-up in vivo study

ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical performance of direct restorations for pit-and-fissure caries in molars using stamp combined with single-shade composite resin (S/SCR) technique, and assess the effect of the number of stamp pressing on the trueness of S/SCR technique. MethodsTwenty molars of fifteen patients with pit-and-fissure caries but with an intact or micro-cavitated occlusal morphology were restored using S/SCR technique and were randomly divided into single pressing group (n = 10) and double pressing group (n = 10). Intraoral scans were obtained before treatment (scan 1), after filling (scan 2) and after polishing (scan 3). Deviation distribution maps of pairwise fitting were created including comparison 1 (scan1/scan 2), comparison 2 (scan1/scan 3), and comparison 3 (scan2/scan 3) using Geomagic Control X software. Root mean square (RMS) values were calculated to evaluate the trueness of restorations. Clinical performances including esthetic, functional, and biological properties of all restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria after a 12-month follow-up. Analysis of variance, independent-samples T test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05). ResultsRMS values for comparison 1, comparison 2, and comparison 3 were 0.1243 ± 0.0151, 0.0966 ± 0.0136, and 0.0605 ± 0.0137 mm in single pressing group, while 0.0831 ± 0.0140, 0.0741 ± 0.0107, and 0.0475 ± 0.0099 mm in double pressing group, respectively. RMS value of single pressing group was higher than that of double pressing group in the same comparison (p ≤ 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). For all properties, all restorations scored within 3, with over 80% scoring 1. ConclusionS/SCR technique presents satisfying clinical performances for pit-and-fissure caries in molars after a 12-month follow-up. Besides, double pressing can improve the trueness of restorations compared to single pressing. Clinical significanceS/SCR technique is efficient in direct composite resin restoration for pit-and-fissure caries, with satisfying esthetic, functional and biological properties after a 12-month follow-up. Significantly, double pressing improves the trueness of S/SCR technique, reducing the need for occlusion adjustment.

Randomized Clinical Trial on Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases: Two-Year Follow-Up.

In recent years, laminate veneer restorations should be considered as a minimally invasive treatment option for several aesthetic reasons. This study compared direct composite veneers' and indirect ceramic laminate veneers' longevity in multiple diastema closures. A total of 28 patients with a mean age of 26 years received 60 direct resin composite (Estelite Asteria; n = 14) and 60 indirect ceramic veneers (IPS e.max Press; n = 14) on the maxillary anterior teeth with diastema closure. Veneers were evaluated at baseline and thereafter every 6 months for up to 2 years using USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact and chi-squared tests, while Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess time to event. In total, three failures were observed in the form of debonding (n = 1) and fracture (n = 2) in the indirect ceramic veneers. No significant difference was observed between the survival rates of composite and ceramic veneers (Estelite Asteria: 93.4%, IPS e.max Press: 95%; p > 0.05). The overall survival rate was 94.2% (Kaplan-Meier). Staining (n = 11) and roughness (n = 14) were frequently observed for the resin composite veneers up to the final recall. Thereby, the preliminary results from this clinical trial comparing two veneer materials indicated that their survival rates were statistically similar. However, surface quality changes were more frequent in the composite veneer material.

Digital resources for surgical and restorative treatment of excessive gingival display in one session.

This article aims to showcase the implementation of a digital workflow in addressing a case of multifactorial excessive gingival display in a patient with high esthetic demands, incorporating both surgical and restorative interventions in a single session. A 28-year-old female patient presented with excessive gingival display, attributed to a combination of short teeth due to altered passive eruption, lip hyperactivity, and a sub-nasal depression that lodged the upper lip during spontaneous smiling. The multidisciplinary treatment strategy encompassed surgical crown lengthening, the placement of a biovolume in the maxillary concavity, and the rehabilitation of the six anterior teeth with direct composite resin, all done in a single session. Smilecloud Biometrics was used to digitally plan the smile, and the final wax-up/mock-up was approved by the patient prior to any irreversible procedure. A digital planning center (GuiderLab) enabled the materialization of the virtual planning and the printing of the periodontal surgical guide, the biovolume, and the resin layering guides for the restorative technique. Adopting a digital workflow in multidisciplinary cases with excessive gingival display leads to predictable and more expedited outcomes, ensuring a favorable result between soft and hard tissues. Excessive gingival display is a condition with multifactorial etiologies, including dentoalveolar, periodontal, skeletal, or muscular origins, or a combination of these factors. The diagnoses of altered passive eruption and a hypermobile upper lip are common in daily clinical practice and can be successfully managed through surgical crown lengthening and filling of the maxillary concavity, respectively. To achieve the desired outcome, restorative procedures often complement these surgical interventions.

Three dimensionally printed template with an interproximal isolation design guide consecutive closure of multiple diastema with injectable resin composite.

This article describes a novel 3D-printed template armed with interproximal matrices to isolate interproximal contact areas and guide injectable resin composite for consecutive closure of multiple diastema. Among several treatment options proposed for diastema closure, direct resin composite is noninvasive and easy to repair. The "composite injection technique" has been introduced to improve time efficiency and reduce technique sensitivity for clinicians. However, in the case of multiple diastema, the overflow of excess resin materials onto the adjacent teeth during injection poses challenges for recontouring the interproximal anatomy. A 3D-printed template with special-designed gaps at interproximal areas was designed and fabricated based on a virtual diagnostic wax-up. Flowable resin composite was then consecutively injected through the template to close diastemata at multiple adjacent teeth. This technique using a 3D-printed template with interproximal isolation design contributed to an efficient and accurate operation for multiple anterior diastema closure. Efficient and accurate freehand buildups of composite restoration for multiple diastema are challenging in operative dentistry. The described noninvasive full digital workflow provides a predictable method to accurately recontour the multiple target restorations and reduce the chair-side time and technical sensitivity.

Fracture Resistance of Direct versus Indirect Restorations on Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare static compression forces between direct composite resin restorations and indirect restorations for posterior teeth. All studies comparing mechanical properties of direct versus indirect restorations of posterior teeth were included from 2007 up to February 2024. A meta-analysis was conducted for static compression fracture resistance. Medline, Central, and Embase databases were screened. Twenty-four articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, and sixteen studies were finally included in the quantitative synthesis. There was no difference in terms of fracture resistance between direct and indirect restorations for posterior teeth (p = 0.16 for direct and indirect composite resin restorations and p = 0.87 for direct composite resin restorations and indirect ceramic restorations). Also, sub-group analysis with or without cusp coverage in each group revealed no discernable difference. Based on this study, it can be concluded that the choice between direct and indirect restoration approaches may not significantly impact fracture resistance outcomes. There was no statically significant difference between direct and indirect restorations for posterior teeth in all cases of restorations with or without cusp coverage and no matter the used materials. However, to better evaluate these materials, further studies are warranted.

Mechanical Properties of Direct Composite Resins and CAD/CAM Composite Blocks

The widespread application of CAD/CAM technology in contemporary dentistry led to the development of promising restorative materials, such as resin composite blocks (RCBs). Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the mechanical properties of RCBs, comparing this material to the direct composite resin from the same manufacturer. Samples retrieved from three CAD/CAM resin composite blocks (Tetric CAD (TC), Ivoclar Vivadent, Grandio blocs (GB), VOCO GmbH and Brilliant Crios (BC), Coltene/Whaledent) and four direct composite resins (Tetric EvoCeram (TEC), Ivoclar Vivadent, GrandioSO (GS), VOCO GmbH, Brilliant EverGlow Translucent (BET) and Universal Shade (BEU), Coltene/Whaledent) were submitted to three-point bending flexural test and Vickers microhardness test. The resulting data of the flexural strength were analyzed using one-way ANOVA considering Bonferroni correction for post hoc tests (α = 0.05). The flexural modulus and Vickers microhardness results were analyzed using Welch’s ANOVA considering Games–Howell correction for post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Regarding results, flexural strength and flexural modulus values ranged from 81.1 MPa (BEU) to 246.5 MPa (GB) and 10.6 GPa (BEU) to 20.3 GPa (GB), respectively. GS (121.2) and GB (136.2) groups were associated with the highest microhardness values. According to the post hoc tests, statistically significant differences in flexure strength were found in RCBs (BC, GB, and TC) compared to all direct composite resins. Flexural modulus and Vickers microhardness of RCBs (BC, GB, TC) were also significantly different from the direct composite resin (BET, BED, and TEC), except when comparing GS and GB for microhardness. In conclusion, differences between RCBs and direct composite resins were observed regarding flexural strength, flexural modulus, and microhardness, revealing that RCBs have enhanced mechanical properties compared to direct composite resins.

The Evaluation of the Cervical Marginal Sealing of Direct vs. Indirect Composite Resin Restorations in MOD Cavities.

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the quality of marginal sealing at the cervical margins of indirect and direct composite resin restorations in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. MOD preparations were performed on 30 extracted teeth. The mesial cervical margin of each tooth was relocated using a flow composite resin (Enamel Plus HRi Flow, Micerium, Avegno, GE, Italy), then the samples were divided into three groups. In group A, the cavities were directly restored using a nanohybrid composite resin (Miris 2 Coltène Whaledent, Altstaetten, Switzerland) and a universal adhesive (ScotchBond Universal, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) by the etch-and-rinse strategy, for group B, the restoration procedure was similar but the self-etch strategy was used, and the samples in group C were filled using the inlay technique. Each sample was stored for 48 h in a 2% methylene blue solution, then it was cut in a mesio-distal direction using a Struers Secotom 50 device (Cleveland, OH, USA). The marginal sealing and adhesive interface were assessed for each sample at the cervical margin by optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used with a significance level of 0.05. Significant differences were recorded within groups A and C, between mesial and distal margins (p = 0.02 in group A and p = 0.043 in group C). The marginal sealing is more effective in MOD inlay restoration compared to direct restorations. Relocation of the cervical margin with flow composite resin and the use of different adhesive strategies do not improve the marginal sealing.

Management of midline diastema using the direct composite resin technique - A case report

Diastema or space between the anterior teeth is a common aesthetic complaint of patients. Direct composite resins in midline diastema cases allow dentists to have complete control in formation of natural smiles. This case report describes midline diastema closure with esthetic composite layering technique. A 25-year-old male patient reported to the clinic, with a complaint of spacing in the upper front tooth region of the jaw. The direct aesthetic composite laminate veneer was considered as the treatment of choice for the build-up of both maxillary central incisors as a more conservative, inexpensive, aesthetic, and quicker option. A2 &amp; A3 shades were selected; prepared tooth surface was etched for 15 seconds using 37% phosphoric acid, rinsed with water for 20 seconds, and air dried with slight air pressure. Bonding agent was applied (Adper single Bond, 3M ESPE, USA) and cured for 20 seconds using (Vivadent Blue phase) curing light. The labial surface of the restoration was flattened using red banded knife-edge tip diamond bur. The natural look of the restored teeth was achieved after finishing and polishing. At six-month and one-year recalls the general outlook of the maxillary anterior teeth was considered natural and aesthetical. Clinically, both restorations have no fractures and also the restoration margins on both maxillary central incisors demonstrated no discolorations. By taking this into consideration and according to the positive results, an experienced dentist with proper case selection, using an appropriate technique and modern materials, can perform highly aesthetic and durable direct composite resin restorations that can satisfy patients as under the conditions of the case presented.

Repair protocols for indirect monolithic restorations: a literature review.

Despite the advancements in indirect monolithic restorations, technical complications may occur during function. To overcome this issues, intraoral repair using resin composite is a practical and low-cost procedure, being able to increase the restoration's longevity. This review aimed to evaluate the need for repair and suggest a standardized repair protocol to the main indirect restorative materials. For this, studies were surveyed from PubMed with no language or date restriction, to investigate the scientific evidence of indirect monolithic restoration repair with direct resin composite. A classification to guide clinical decisions was made based on the FDI World Dental Federation criteria about defective indirect restorations considering esthetic and functional standards, along with the patient's view, to decide when polishing, repairing or replacing a defective restoration. Based on 38 surveyed studies, different resin composite intraoral repair protocols, that included mechanical and chemical aspects, were defined depending on the substrate considering resin-based, glass-ceramic or zirconia restorations. The presented criteria and protocols were developed to guide the clinician's decision-making process regarding defective indirect monolithic restorations, prolonging longevity and increasing clinical success.

Repair of monolithic zirconia restorations with different direct resin composites: effect on the fatigue bonding and mechanical performance

ObjectiveThe study aims to evaluate the shear bond and flexural strength fatigue behavior of yttrium-stabilized zirconia (4YSZ) repaired using different resin composites.Materials and methodsCylindric specimens of 4YSZ were obtained for the bond strength (Ø = 6 mm, 1.5 mm of thickness) and biaxial flexural strength (Ø = 15 mm, 1 mm of thickness) fatigue tests and divided into 3 groups according to the repair resin composite: EVO (nanohybrid), BULK (bulk-fill), and FLOW (flowable). The zirconia surface was air-abraded with alumina particles, a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) primer was applied, and the resin composite was build-up over the zirconia. Fatigue shear bond strength and flexural fatigue strength tests were performed (n = 15). One-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were carried out for both outcomes, besides scanning electron microscopy and finite element analysis.ResultsThe repair material affected the fatigue shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic. The BULK group (18.9 MPa) depicted higher bond strength values than FLOW (14.8 MPa) (p = 0.04), while EVO (18.0 MPa) showed similar results to both groups. No effect was observed for the mechanical behavior (p = 0.53). The stress distribution was similar for all groups.ConclusionThe repair of yttrium-stabilized zirconia (4YSZ) ceramics with bulk-fill resin composites was the best option for high fatigue bond strength. However, the fatigue mechanical performance was similar regardless of the applied repair material.Clinical relevanceThe repair of yttrium-stabilized zirconia (4YSZ) monolithic restorations may be performed with nanohybrid and bulk-fill resin composites in order to promote longevity in the treatment.

The treatment options for the traumatically fractured tooth; Case reports

The traumatic accident could cause various damages to the teeth and surrounding tissues. It makes dentist embarrass be-cause it not only requires the dentist to make quick decision, but also delayed decision affect the prognosis of the treatment. Depending on the location of the fracture, the fractured teeth are divided into crown fracture without pulpal involvement (Uncomplicated crown fracture), crown fracture with pulpal involvement (Complicated crown fracture), crown-root frac-ture, and root fracture. When the crown was fractured, treatment was performed with reattachment of the fragment or direct composite resin restoration depending on the presence or absence of the crown fragment. In the case of crown-root fracture, the direction of treatment can be set depending on whether the moisture control for final restoration is properly performed. In the case of root fracture, follow-up was observed after fixation using resin wire splint fixation, and if necessary, endodontic treatment of the crown fragment is recommended. The cases reported here have led to positive treatment outcome in fractured tooth for various traumatized situation.