Diphosphate-ribose Polymerase Research Articles

Deciphering the Molecular Mechanisms behind Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer to Unlock Efficient Treatment Options.

Ovarian cancer is a highly lethal form of gynecological cancer. This disease often goes undetected until advanced stages, resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates. Unfortunately, many patients experience relapse and succumb to the disease due to the emergence of drug resistance that significantly limits the effectiveness of currently available oncological treatments. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanisms responsible for resistance to carboplatin, paclitaxel, polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors, and bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. We present a detailed analysis of the most extensively investigated resistance mechanisms, including drug inactivation, drug target alterations, enhanced drug efflux pumps, increased DNA damage repair capacity, and reduced drug absorption/accumulation. The in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanisms associated with drug resistance is crucial to unveil new biomarkers capable of predicting and monitoring the kinetics during disease progression and discovering new therapeutic targets.

Outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer progressed after prior poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of previous poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy on the effectiveness of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC). MethodsWe identified patients with PSROC who underwent SCS at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, between January 2010 and December 2022. Postoperative complications within 30 days were categorized using the Accordion Severity Grading System. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to estimate both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and multivariate analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. ResultsOf the 265 patients included, 39 received prior PARP inhibitor therapy (Group A), and 226 did not (Group B). The rates of complete resection after SCS did not significantly differ between the two groups (79.5 % for Group A vs. 81.0 % for Group B; p = 0.766). As of December 2023, Group A exhibited a significantly shorter median PFS (14.2 months) than Group B (22.5 months; p = 0.002). Furthermore, the 3-year OS rate was lower in Group A (72.5 %) than in Group B (82.7 %; p = 0.015). The incidence of severe postoperative complications was comparable between Groups A and B (7.7 % vs. 1.8 %; p = 0.061). Multivariate analysis revealed that prior PARP inhibitor therapy significantly reduced the median PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.434; p = 0.021) and OS (HR = 2.076; p = 0.010). ConclusionsSCS for PSROC demonstrated reduced efficacy in patients previously treated with PARP inhibitors compared to those without prior PARP inhibitor treatment.

Abstract PO4-08-02: Genetic testing among patients with triple-negative breast cancer at a single health system: a quality improvement project

Abstract Background: Breast cancer is the most common type and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Approximately 15-20% of patients have triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at diagnosis. TNBC is aggressive, difficult to treat, prone to relapse, and associated with an increased mortality rate. The incidence of BRCA1/2 mutation is about 20% in patients with TNBC (Hartman et al. 2012). Despite the high prevalence of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes among TNBC patients, many do not received genetic counseling (GC) or genetic testing (GT). National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines now recommend GT for all patients with TNBC, regardless of age, especially after the approval of Poly Adenosine diphosphate Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for targeted therapy against BRCA1/2 mutations. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to identify patients with TNBC who did not receive GT and design an intervention to understand potential barriers to receiving GC and GT. Methods: We implemented a QI project to identify previously diagnosed adult patients with TNBC (18 years and older) of any stage (early or advanced/metastatic) without prior GT or family history of genetic disorders with active follow-up at the Henry Ford health breast cancer clinic. Eligible patients diagnosed between January 2015 and January 2020 from the Syapse Learning Health Network database were included. Baseline information as well as additional data including demographics, breast cancer treatment details, and whether GT and/or GC was offered or not was obtained through electronic health record review after institutional review board committee approval. Bi-monthly meetings were held amongst breast cancer providers, genetic counselors, and nurse navigators to develop an intervention to contact the patients who did not undergo GT and/or GC. After obtaining the list of patients who did not undergo GT and/or GC despite meeting eligibility criteria, they were contacted by their primary breast cancer providers via telephone regarding their willingness to obtain GT and/or GC at this time and participate in a questionnaire-based interview to understand barriers towards the same. Results: In the 5 years, a total of 123 patients were noted to have been diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer. Of these, 93 patients were actively being followed at the Henry Ford breast clinic at the time of the QI project. 2 of the 9 patients who underwent GT and GC were positive for BRCA1/2 mutation. Of the remaining 83 patients that did not receive GC or GT, 65 (78.3%) had no clear reason explained in the chart, 27 patients (32.5%) chose not to get tested, 23 (27.7%) were not deemed to be eligible upon initial assessment and 4 (4.8%) had pending orders placed by breast surgeons upon initial diagnosis. Unfortunately, 29 of these 83 patients were noted to have been deceased when the intervention was being designed. Remaining 54 patients were contacted by their primary breast cancer oncologists to determine their willingness in participating in the questionnaire-based interview. Conclusion: Based on the results of our QI project, we have now developed a process to contact the identified patients and renew the offer for GT and GC as well as participation in a questionnaire-based interview to understand the potential barriers to testing. We also plan to improve physician education and awareness by conducting mini sessions during our annual symposium meetings as well as grand rounds and develop a protocol for ordering GT and GC in patients with TNBC at our institution. Citation Format: Manasi Godbole, Mary Nyhuis, Travis Washburn, Joann Hirth, Haythem Ali. Genetic testing among patients with triple-negative breast cancer at a single health system: a quality improvement project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-08-02.

Polyphyllin I enhances tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced inhibition of human osteosarcoma cell growth downregulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

To investigate the synergistic effects of polyphyllin I (PPI) combined with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) on the growth of osteosarcoma cells through downregulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cell viability, apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were examined using cell counting kit-8 and flow cytometry assays. The morphology of cancer cells was observed with inverted phase contrast microscope. The migration and invasion abilities were examined by xCELLigence real time cell analysis DP system and transwell assays. The expressions of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase, C-Myc, Cyclin B1, cyclin-dependent kinases 1, N-cadherin, Vimentin, Active-β-catenin, β-catenin, p-glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) and GSK-3β were determined by Western blotting assay. PPI sensitized TRAIL-induced decrease of viability, migration and invasion, as well as increase of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of MG-63 and U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells. The synergistic effect of PPI with TRAIL in inhibiting the growth of osteosarcoma cells was at least partially realized through the inactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. The combination of PPI and TRAIL is potentially a novel treatment strategy of osteosarcoma.

Abstract 541: Establishment of Inotuzumab ozogamicin resistant leukemia cell lines; Focusing on p-gp and DNA damage repair for overcoming drug resistance

Abstract Introduction: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (IO) is a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated with chalicheamicin, which causes single- and double-strand DNA breaks. Although IO shows a high CR/CRi rate in relapsed/refractory CD22-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the duration of remission is short due to early acquisition of resistance. Therefore, the present study attempted to enhance the cytotoxicity of IO by focusing on polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition. Furthermore, IO-resistant cell lines were newly established to investigate the mechanism of IO resistance. Methods: Reh cell line derived from Ph-negative B-ALL cells was used. To establish IO-resistant cell lines, Reh cells were long-term exposed to IO, followed by limiting dilution. FACS analysis evaluated the CD22 positivity and the induction of apoptosis. WTS assay determined the cell growth inhibition effects. The Comet assay quantitatively assessed DNA damage. Gene expression profiles were determined by using DNA microarray. Results: The 50%-inhibitory concentration (IC50) of IO was 2.1 ng/mL in Reh cells. Reh cells were synergistically sensitized to IO by the addition of non-toxic concentrations of PARP inhibitors, olaparib or talazoparib, with the Combination Index of 0.19 and 0.42, respectively. Moreover, these combinations augmented the induction of apoptosis (23.5% in IO alone, 51.7% in IO + olaparib, 66.1% in IO + talazoparib). The Comet assay demonstrated that DNA strand breaks observed 1h after IO administration were repaired 6h later. In the combination of IO with olaparib or talazoparib, DNA damage remained even at 6h, suggesting the inhibition of DNA repair by PARP inhibitors. Next, six IO-resistant cell lines were established with IC50 more than 60-fold that of parental cells. All these cell lines kept CD22 expression. These cell lines were also resistant to apoptosis induced by IO. In addition of olaparib or talazoparib to IO, the IC50 of IO decreased by 40% to 70% in 6 IO-resistant cells. These combinations also augmented the induction of apoptosis (24.2% in IO alone, 45.3% in IO+olaparib, and 56.8% in IO+talazoparib). DNA microarray was performed to compare gene expression profiles between parental and IO-resistant cell lines. ABCB1 (p-gp), a drug efflux pump that causes multi-drug resistance, was overexpressed in resistant cell lines. Moreover, the addition of p-gp inhibitor, PSC-833, to IO enhanced the cell growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis due to more DNA strand break. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the combination of IO with PARP inhibitors exerted synergistic cytotoxicity via the inhibition of DNA repair. In addition, it was suggested that overexpression of p-gp caused IO resistance, which was partially reversed with the combination of PARP inhibitors or a p-gp inhibitor. Citation Format: Naoko Ida, Miyuki Okura, Naoko Hosono, Takahiro Yamauchi. Establishment of Inotuzumab ozogamicin resistant leukemia cell lines; Focusing on p-gp and DNA damage repair for overcoming drug resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 541.

A Phase II Study of Rucaparib Monotherapy in Nonmetastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Demonstrating "BRCAness" Genotype (ROAR).

Both germline and somatic BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) mutations are poor prognostic markers in men with localized or metastatic prostate cancer. For instance, men with these mutations often are diagnosed with prostate cancer earlier and develop metastatic disease earlier compared with those who do not harbor similar mutations. Patients with germline alterations typically have more advanced disease and shorter overall survival (Castro E, Goh C, Olmos D, et al. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1748-1757. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1882). The risk of disease progression to metastatic disease is significant in patients with this genotype of prostate cancer. The percentage of patients free from metastatic disease was 90%, 72%, and 50%, respectively, compared with 97%, 94%, and 84% at 3, 5, and 10 years for patients with intact DNA repair (P < .001) (Castro E, Goh C, Leongamornlert D, et al. Effect of BRCA mutations on metastatic relapse and cause-specific survival after radical treatment for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.022). DNA damage repair non-BRCA mutations include alterations in genes such as ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, and RAD51. While less common than BRCA mutations, they have emerged as significant prognostic markers in prostate cancer. These BRCAness mutations are associated with a higher risk of aggressive disease and poorer survival outcomes. Given the debilitating physical and psychological side effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in relatively younger men with prostate cancer, delaying ADT in these men may be an attractive strategy. Given the proven efficacy of polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the castration-resistant prostate cancersetting, PARP inhibitor monotherapy in a nonmetastatic castration-sensitive (nmCSPC) setting has the potential to delay metastasis and delay the onset of ADT related symptoms. This is a single-arm, single-center, open-label, phase II trial to assess the efficacy of rucaparib in patients with high-risk biochemically recurrent (BCR) nmHSPC, which was defined as PSA doubling time of <9 months, demonstrating a "BRCAness" genotype (BRCA1/2 and other homologous recombination repair mutations). A total of 15 patients were intended to be enrolled, with an expected enrollment duration of 12 months. Patients were given rucaparib 600 mg orally twice daily and were allowed to remain on study treatment until PSA progression defined by Prostate Cancer Working Group 3, with 2 years of follow-up after study treatment. We anticipated a total of 2-3 years until completion of the clinical trial. The primary endpoint was to assess the PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). The secondary endpoints of the study were safety, the proportion of patients with a PSA 50% response (PSA 50), and an undetectable PSA. A 4-week treatment duration comprised one cycle. The study started enrolling in June 2019 and was prematurely terminated in June 2022 after the accrual of 7 patients because of changing standard of care treatments with the introduction of next-generation scans, eg, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Seven patients were enrolled in the study with the following pathogenic alterations: ATM (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 1), BRIP1 (n = 1), and RAD51 (n = 1). The median duration of follow-up was 18 months. A median of 20 cycles (range 4-42) was completed, median PSA-PFS was 35.37 months (95% CI, 0-85.11 months). In total, 2 patients achieved PSA50; both also achieved nadir PSA as undetectable. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were anemia and rash (in 1 patient each). No dose-limiting toxicities or severe AEs were seen. Rucaparib demonstrated acceptable toxicity and efficacy signal as an ADT-sparing approach in patients with biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic prostate cancer. It is currently challenging to understand the optimal value of systemic therapy in this disease setting due to the rapidly changing standard of care. Additionally, there are relatively few patients with BRCAness who present with nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03533946).

Current Status of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Alpha Radioligand Therapy in Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent malignancy and leading cause of mortality in men. Despite the development of various drugs, such as novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors targeting homologous recombination repair-related genetic mutations, prognosis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remains unfavorable. However, recent advances in nuclear medicine have allowed for both imaging diagnostics and therapeutic interventions by targeting molecules specifically expressed in cancer cells with radioisotopes (RI). γ-rays are used in nuclear medicine imaging, whereas in therapy, α or β-emitting RIs are administered to target cells in radiation therapy. PCa, in particular, exhibits the characteristic features of radioligand therapy, as the membrane protein prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is proportionally highly expressed in malignancy compared to normal tissues. The administered RI-labeled compound binds to PSMA, enabling specific targeting of PCa for treatment. Unlike β-rays, α-rays have a shorter range and impart stronger energy to DNA, allowing α-particles to exhibit a higher linear energy transfer. Due to such characteristics, PSMA-targeted α radiotherapy is expected to have potent cytotoxic effects and fewer side effects on normal organs, making them more likely to be widely adopted in the future. However, reports on PSMA-targeted α radiotherapy differ in aspects, such as prior PSMA-targeted β radiotherapy, the administered doses, and the number of treatment cycles. Therefore, in this review, we compile the reports on treatments utilizing α-emitting isotopes targeting PSMA in patients with PCa.

Advancements in Endometrial Cancer Research in 2023

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynaecological cancers in developed countries, and the incidence is rising significantly. The staging of this disease is evolving from anatomic staging and risk stratification to a more molecular-based stratification. Treatment of endometrial cancer is also evolving. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is the standard first-line chemotherapy for endometrial cancer; however, there is new evidence that the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has synergistic effects in the treatment of this disease. This article discusses the latest advancements in endometrial cancer research in 2023, including highlights from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancers 2023 in March, the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in June, the 24th European Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Congress in September and October, and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2023 in October. The article highlights the unprecedented progression-free survival (PFS) data from two Phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating first-line immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: RUBY with dostarlimab, and NRG-GY018 with pembrolizumab, which created a buzz at SGO 2023 in the spring, and stimulated discussion throughout the remainder of the year. The overall survival (OS) results, the clinically meaningful benefits regardless of mismatch repair status, and health-related quality of life (QOL) in these studies are also discussed. Further topics covered in this year-in-review article include the implications of the results from RUBY and NRG-GY018 on first-line treatment and recurrent settings, and the effect of adding a poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor to immunotherapy–chemotherapy combinations in the Phase III trial, DUO-E. Disparities in endometrial cancer care, research on fertility-sparing, and the importance of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) in endometrial cancer management are also explored. Following the announcement of practice-changing findings from RUBY and NRG-GY018 in March, data presented and published throughout the remainder of 2023 show that research in endometrial cancer continues at a pace.

Methanol Extract of Petasites japonicas Promotes Apoptosis via the MAPK and ROS-dependent Signaling Pathways

Background: Petasites japonicus (PJ), also known as Butterbur, has a rich history as a traditional healing remedy across numerous countries. Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the potential anti-cancer properties of the methanol extract derived from PJ (PJE). Materials and Methods: Cell viability was measured with 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide. Cell cycle analysis, caspase activity assays, western blotting, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) assays were also used to investigate the anticancer effects of PJE on cancer cells. Results: It was shown that PJE inhibited the cell viability of the colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]: 268.4 µg/mL), of the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep3B (IC50: 420.2 µg/mL), and of the bladder carcinoma cell line 5637 (IC50: 99.43 µg/mL). Analysis of DNA content indicated an increase in the sub-G1 population of 5637 cells as a result of PJE treatment. Furthermore, PJE caused a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential and the ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax. Moreover, PJE enhanced the levels of various components involved in the proapoptotic cascade, such as caspase-3, caspase-9, and poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase. Moreover, it was observed that PJE modulated mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) activation and induced an elevation in intracellular production of ROS. Conclusion: These combined results strongly suggest that PJE possesses significant proapoptotic properties as an herbal medicine, acting through ROS-dependent MAPK signaling pathways in bladder cancer cells.

Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients With Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations

The OlympiA trial found that 1 year of adjuvant olaparib therapy can improve distant disease-free survival and overall survival from early-stage breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. However, olaparib, an oral poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitor, is estimated to cost approximately $14 000 per month in the US. To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of adjuvant olaparib compared with no olaparib in eligible patients. In an economic evaluation from a health care system perspective, the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant olaparib was analyzed using a Markov state-transition model. The model simulated costs and lifetime health outcomes of 42-year-old women with high-risk early-stage breast cancer and a known BRCA1/2 mutation who completed definitive primary therapy and neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy. The study was conducted from August 2021 to July 2023. The effectiveness of olaparib was based on the findings of the OlympiA randomized clinical trial, and other model parameters were identified from the literature. The model was calibrated to the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year distant disease-free and overall survival observed in the OlympiA trial, and olaparib was assumed to reduce the risk of distant recurrence only in the first 4 years. One year of adjuvant olaparib or no adjuvant olaparib. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in 2021 US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. All outcomes were discounted by 3% annually. In the base case, adjuvant olaparib was associated with a 1.25-year increase in life expectancy and a 1.20-QALY increase at an incremental cost of $133 133 compared with no olaparib. The resulting ICER was approximately $111 000 per QALY gained. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY, olaparib was cost-effective at its 2021 price and in more than 92% of simulations in probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The results were sensitive to assumptions about the effectiveness of olaparib and quality of life for patients with no disease recurrence. In this study, from a US health care system perspective, adjuvant olaparib was a cost-effective option for patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.

BRCA1/2 alterations and reversion mutations in the area of PARP inhibitors in high grade ovarian cancer: state of the art and forthcoming challenges.

BRCA1/2 genes are part of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathways in charge of error-free double-strand break (DSB) repair. Loss-of-function mutations of BRCA1/2 genes have been associated for a long time with breast and ovarian cancer hereditary syndrome. Recently, polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of BRCA1/2-mutated tumors, especially of BRCA1/2 high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), taking advantage of HR deficiency through the synthetic lethality concept. However, PARPi efficiency differs among patients, and most of them will develop resistance, particularly in the relapse setting. In the current proposal, we aim to review primary and secondary resistance to PARPi in HGSC owing to BRCA1/2 alterations. Of note, as several mechanisms of primary or secondary resistance to PARPi have been described, BRCA1/2 reversion mutations that restore HR pathways are by far the most reported. First, the type and location of the BRCA1/2 primary mutation have been associated with PARPi and platinum-salt sensitivity and impact the probability of the occurrence and the type of secondary reversion mutation. Furthermore, the presence of multiple reversion mutations and the variation of allelic frequency under treatment underline the role of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) in treatment resistance. Of note, circulating tumor DNA might help us to detect and characterize reversion mutations and ITH to finally refine the treatment strategy. Importantly, forthcoming therapeutic strategies, including combination with antiangiogenics or with targeted therapies, may help us delay and overcome PARPi resistance secondary to BRCA1/2 reversion mutations. Also, progression despite PARPi therapy does not preclude PARPi rechallenge in selected patients.

Pitavastatin induces caspase-mediated apoptotic death through oxidative stress and DNA damage in combined with cisplatin in human cervical cancer cell line.

Pitavastatin (PITA) is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor to treat hypercholesterolemia and in recent studies is focused that its potential anti-cancer effect. This study was aimed to elucidate the effect of PITA alone and in combination with cisplatin on cervical cancer cells (HeLa) in vitro. Cytotoxicity of PITA (5-200 μM) was evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and neutral red uptake (NRU) assays for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle analyses were performed in flow cytometry (0.1-100 μM). The evaluation of genotoxic effects and oxidative DNA damage of PITA (2-200 μM) were performed with standard comet assay, formamidopyrimidine glycosylase (fpg)-modified comet assay, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) activation in HeLa cells. PITA alone reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner (20-200, 20-200, and 5-200 μM for 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, in MTT). The combined treatment of PITA with cisplatin resulted in significantly greater inhibition of cell viability. ROS and DNA damage increased significantly at 100 μM for 4 h and 20 μM for 24 h, respectively. PITA-induced apoptosis, an increased proportion of sub G1 cells, was monitored, and also, it increased the expression of active caspase-9 and caspase-3 and upregulated cleaved poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) by western blotting and caspase 3/8/9 multiple assay kit. We conclude that PITA can be used to efficiently cervical cancer studies, and promising findings have been obtained for further studies.

Real-world prevalence of homologous recombination repair mutations in advanced prostate cancer: an analysis of two clinico-genomic databases.

Homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) status may guide risk-stratification and treatment decisions, including polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitor use, in advanced prostate cancer. Although HRRm prevalence has been reported in single-institution studies or clinical trials, real-world HRRm prevalence in diverse populations is unknown. We describe HRRm in the clinical setting using two real-world clinicogenomic databases: the Flatiron Health and Foundation Medicine, Inc. Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB), a national electronic health record-derived database, and the American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE). This cross-sectional analysis included 3757 individuals diagnosed with prostate cancer who had next generation sequencing (NGS) as standard of care. The CGDB included men with advanced/metastatic prostate cancer and genetic data included both germline and somatic pathogenic mutations. The GENIE analysis included men with prostate cancer whose received NGS as standard of care, but the data were filtered to include somatic mutations only. Due to key differences among databases, direct comparisons were not possible. Overall prevalence of HRRm was calculated and stratified by demographic and clinical characteristics. HRRm prevalence (combined germline and somatic) in CGDB (n = 487) was 24.6% (95% CI 20.9-28.7%), with no major differences across demographic and disease characteristic subgroups. HRRm prevalence (somatic) in GENIE (n = 3270) was 11.0% (95% CI 10.0-12.1%), which varied between 9.5% and 18.4% across treatment centers. Approximately one-quarter of patients with advanced/metastatic prostate cancer in the CGDB had germline and/or somatic HRRm, which is consistent with clinical trials such as the PROfound study that used a similar NGS platform and algorithm to define HRRm. In the GENIE database, HRRm prevalence varied by treatment center or NGS platform. More research is needed to understand real-world HRRm prevalence variations.

Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors: advances, implications, and challenges in tumor radiotherapy sensitization.

Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) is a key modifying enzyme in cells, which participates in single-strand break repair and indirectly affects double-strand break repair. PARP inhibitors have shown great potential in oncotherapy by exploiting DNA damage repair pathways, and several small molecule PARP inhibitors have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating various tumor types. PARP inhibitors not only have significant antitumor effects but also have some synergistic effects when combined with radiotherapy; therefore they have potential as radiation sensitizers. Here, we reviewed the advances and implications of PARP inhibitors in tumor radiotherapy sensitization. First, we summarized the multiple functions of PARP and the mechanisms by which its inhibitors exert antitumor effects. Next, we discuss the immunomodulatory effects of PARP and its inhibitors in tumors. Then, we described the theoretical basis of using PARP inhibitors in combination with radiotherapy and outlined their importance in oncological radiotherapy. Finally, we reviewed the current challenges in this field and elaborated on the future applications of PARP inhibitors as radiation sensitizers. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanism, optimal dosing, long-term safety, and identification of responsive biomarkers remain key challenges to integrating PARP inhibition into the radiotherapy management of cancer patients. Therefore, extensive research in these areas would facilitate the development of precision radiotherapy using PARP inhibitors to improve patient outcomes.

Abstract C167: An SN38 dendrimer nanoparticle, DEP irinotecan (SN38-SPL9111), demonstrates efficacy in mouse models of gastrointestinal cancer and augments anti-tumor effects of immune checkpoint blockade and PARP inhibition

Abstract Background: Irinotecan is a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor pro-drug used to treat gastrointestinal (GI) cancers including as first line for colorectal cancer (CRC) as part of the FOLFIRI plus monoclonal antibody (mAb) regimen, and for pancreatic cancer in the FOLFIRINOX regimen. However, irinotecan causes severe and dose-limiting side effects, including diarrhea and neutropenia. Starpharma has developed a highly optimized polylysine dendrimer enhanced (DEP) nanoparticle conjugate of the irinotecan active metabolite, SN38 (DEP SN38 or DEP irinotecan). DEP SN38 avoids the need for liver conversion of irinotecan to SN38 and achieves preferential tumor targeting. DEP SN38 is in phase 2 clinical investigation as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with solid tumors (EudraCT no: 2019-001318-40). SN38 is known to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) via effects on immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we evaluated the anti-tumor effects of DEP SN38 alone or in combination with either ICB (anti- programmed cell death-1 [PD1] mAb) or poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition (olaparib) in mouse models of GI cancer. Methods: HT29 (human CRC) and CAPAN-1 (human pancreatic cancer) cell line xenografts were established subcutaneously in BALB/c nude or NOD-scid-Gamma immunodeficient mice, respectively. Three doses of DEP SN38 (at 5-10mg/kg SN38) or irinotecan (35-80 mg/kg) were administered intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, 15. Olaparib (50 mg/kg) was delivered by daily IV injection for 5 days/week over 3 weeks. DEP SN38 (IV on days 1, 8, 15 at 18-35 mg/kg SN38) or irinotecan (75 mg/kg) plus rat anti-PD1 mAb therapy or control mAb (intraperitoneally, 100 mg/kg then 50 mg/kg on days 5, 8, 12) was evaluated in both MC38 (C57BL/6) and CT26 (BALB/c) allograft models of CRC. Toleration of drug was bodyweight loss ≤15%. Results: DEP SN38 treatment of HT29 or CAPAN-1 xenografts led to tumor regressions, prolonged control of tumor growth and improved survival. In contrast, conventional irinotecan had minimal effect on tumor growth versus vehicle control. DEP SN38 was well tolerated by mice with minimal bodyweight loss. Administration of anti-PD1 mAb alone confirmed the known modest sensitivity of MC38, and resistance of CT26 syngeneic tumors, to ICB. DEP SN38 plus anti-PD1 mAb, enhanced anti-tumor responses in the MC38 model beyond those seen for each agent alone and also resulted in tumor eradication and prolonged survival. In the CT26 model, anti-PD1 mAb was also augmented by addition of DEP SN38 but not irinotecan alone, despite resistance of CT26 tumors to anti-PD1 mAb alone. The HT29 CRC model was resistant to Olaparib alone. In contrast, anti-tumor effects and prolonged survival were observed with olaparib plus DEP SN38. Conclusions: DEP SN38 demonstrated superior efficacy compared to irinotecan when used in models of GI cancer. The anti-tumor efficacy of both ICB and PARP inhibition was augmented by DEP SN38 in models of CRC, and these combinations should be investigated clinically. Citation Format: Benjamin J Blyth, Brian D Kelly, Michael Giannis, Anne Cargill, Aynaz Seta, Graham P Heery, Anthony Eglezos, Cameron N Johnstone, Jeremy R A Paull. An SN38 dendrimer nanoparticle, DEP irinotecan (SN38-SPL9111), demonstrates efficacy in mouse models of gastrointestinal cancer and augments anti-tumor effects of immune checkpoint blockade and PARP inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C167.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery with and without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) can afford promising results in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer; however, the impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains unclear. We compared the outcomes of secondary CRS combined with and without HIPEC in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. We retrospectively evaluated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent secondary CRS, with or without HIPEC (n=46), at the Yonsei Cancer Center between January 2006 and February 2021. Of the 46 included patients, 20 underwent secondary CRS-plus-HIPEC, while 26 underwent secondary CRS without HIPEC (henceforth referred to as secondary CRS-only). Of the 46 patients, 84.8% and 89.1% had undergone optimal surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, respectively, as the initial treatment before the first relapse. Overall, 32.6% of patients received maintenance therapy, such as bevacizumab or polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors. The median follow-up period was 15.9 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.7 and 25.1 months in the secondary CRS-plus-HIPEC and secondary CRS-only groups, respectively; however, both groups failed to reach the median overall survival (OS). Based on the Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no difference in PFS (P=0.587) or OS (P=0.239) between the two groups. We identified patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and found that the median PFS was 25.1 months in the secondary CRS-only group; this was not achieved in the secondary CRS-plus-HIPEC group (P=0.244). In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, secondary CRS with HIPEC did not improve survival when compared with CRS without HIPEC. However, on subgrouping patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to secondary CRS tended to improve PFS.

Spectroscopic, quantum computational, topological, Fukui functions and molecular docking analysis on a potential anti-cancer molecule Nicotinamide by DFT method

Nicotinamide has been identified as an anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-tumorigenic activity in the medical field. To evaluate the cytotoxic effects of nicotinamide against cancer cells; a detailed spectroscopic investigation was made and examined through FT-IR, FT-Raman and UV–Vis techniques. For quantum computational calculation, the DFT method was performed in order to identify the structural and vibrational assignments of the molecule on the basis of the potential energy distribution. The Time-dependent DFT method was applied to compute electronic excitation and predict UV–Vis spectra. The molecular electrostatic potential, frontier molecular orbitals, natural bond orbital, electronic localization function and localized orbital locator were analyzed to study the topological, chemical reactivity and bioactivity nature of the molecule by suitable computational techniques. The scatter plot of the reduced density gradients was constructed to predict the weak interactions. In addition to these analyses, the local reactivity descriptors like the local softness and Fukui functions were obtained. Furthermore, the molecular docking studies of the molecule were carried out to analyze the biological activity against cancer cells with the target proteins under the class of Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase enzyme inhibitors and the respective docking parameters were calculated. As per the investigation, the anti-cancer activity had revealed based on molecular docking analysis and it had been identified that the nicotinamide molecule could act as a good inhibitor against cancer.

Combining Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (IO) with PARP Inhibitors, Olaparib and Talazoparib, Exerts Synergistic Cytotoxicity By Inhibiting the Repair of IO-Induced DNA Strand Breaks in IO-Resistant ALL Cells

[Introduction]Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) is highly effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory CD22-positive B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). IO exerts the antileukemic effect via DNA single- and double-strand breaks induced by calicheamicin. Although IO has been reported to show more than 80% response rate, the duration of remission is only 4.6 months, suggesting the early acquisition of drug resistance. Thus, it is crucial to elucidate the mechanism of resistance to IO and overcome it. Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib and talazoparib, show the antitumor effect by inhibiting DNA repair. This study was conducted to enhance the antitumor effect of IO by inhibiting IO-induced DNA damage repair using PARP inhibitors. The study attempted to overcome the resistance of B-ALL cell lines developed to be IO-resistant. [Methods]Ph-negative, CD22-positive B-ALL Reh cell line was used to determine the cytotoxicity of IO and PARP inhibitors. Inotuzumab ozogamicin was kindly provided by Pfizer. Six IO-resistant cell lines were newly established by long-term exposure of Reh cells to IO, followed by the limiting dilution. FACS analysis evaluated CD22 expression. WTS assay and Annexin-V positivity were used to determine the antileukemic effects. The Comet assay assessed the DNA repair function. The DNA microarray compared gene expression between Reh and IO-resistant Reh clones. [Results] The growth inhibition effect of IO was significantly augmented by the addition of the minimally toxic concentration of olaparib or talazoparib in Reh cells. The combination index values were 0.19 and 0.42, respectively, demonstrating a strong synergism. Combining IO with olaparib or talazoparib increased IO-induced apoptosis compared to single-agent IO. The apoptosis rates induced by 20 ng/mL IO with minimally toxic concentrations of olaparib or talazoparib were 51.7% and 66.1%, respectively, showing significantly higher apoptosis rates than IO alone (23.5%). Assessment of DNA strand breaks using the Comet assay showed that the recovery of IO-induced DNA damage was inhibited in the presence of PARP inhibitors, and DNA strand breaks persisted. Next, six IO-resistant Reh (Reh-IO-R) cell lines were established as described above. The expressions of CD22 were more than 60%. All 6 cell lines had more than 60-fold resistance to IO with the 50%-inhibitory concentration (IC 50) values 474.3～782.3 ng/mL, compared with that of Reh cells (2.1 ng/mL). The IC 50 values of olaparib or talazoparib were similar to Reh and Reh-IO-R cell lines. When IO was combined with olaparib or talazoparib, the growth of Reh-IO-R cells was inhibited, with median IC 50 values were 359.4[290.3-406.2] and 179.1[59.3-240.5] ng/mL, respectively. This combination also remarkably increased apoptosis induction in Reh-IO-R cells. The apoptosis rate of Reh cells at 100 ng/mL IO alone was 77%, whereas the apoptosis rate of 6 Reh-IO-R cell lines averaged 5.9% [5.7-6.6%]. The median percentage of apoptosis in Reh-IO-R cell lines was 12.0% by IO + olaparib and 17.1% by IO + talazoparib. Furthermore, synergism was obtained in Reh-IO-R cell lines with the combination of 1,000 ng/mL IO with olaparib or talazoparib. The median percentage of apoptotic cell death was 24.2% by IO 1,000 ng/mL alone and 45.3% by the IO+olaparib, and 56.8% by the IO+talazoparib. These results suggest that the potentiating effect of PARP inhibitors would be attributed to more DNA cleavage occurring. The expression of genes ( ATM, ATR, DNA-PK, CHK1/2, PARP, RAD, ERCC1, BRCA1/2 Ku70/80) related to DNA repair was similar between Reh and Reh-IO-R cells. Of note, ABCB1 (p-gp) was overexpressed in Reh-IO-R cells. These results suggest that the expression of p-gp was one of the mechanisms of the resistance to IO, and the combination of IO and PARP inhibitors was effective to a certain extent in the Reh-IO-R cells expressing p-gp. This would be because the PARP inhibitors were still effective in inhibiting the DNA repair in Reh-IO-R cells where the DNA repair function was not augmented. [Conclusion]The combination of IO with PARP inhibitors synergized the antileukemic effect of IO by inhibiting DNA strand break repair in CD22-positive ALL cell lines and IO-resistant ALL cells, suggesting that these results may contribute to overcoming the IO resistance mechanisms.

Combination therapy with poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling pathway (ARPi) inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is aheterogeneous disease with varying clinical and molecular subtypes. Almost one-third of patients have abnormalities in homologous recombinant repair genes. Again, about one third of these mutations affect the BReast CAncer1 or2 (BRCA1 or BRCA2) genes, which generally render tumours receptive to treatment with poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). In 2020 the PARPi olaparib was approved for the treatment of mCRPC after progression with anew hormonal drug (androgen receptor signaling pathway inhibitors, ARPi). In 2022 and 2023 approval of two combination therapies followed, each combining aPARPi and an ARPi (olaparib plus abiraterone and niraparib plus abiraterone). The combination of talazoparib plus enzalutamide will be approved soon. This article introduces the pivotal clinical trials that led to the approval of the respective substances, reports the side effects that may occur during therapy with PARPi plus ARPi, and offers recommendations for management of these side effects.

Target-Oriented Classification of Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative is termed triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the first choice of treatment against TNBC due to lack of specific therapeutic targets. TNBC is not classified based on therapeutic targets, but recently, the development of targeted therapies - including immune checkpoint inhibitors and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors - has gained attention. This study aimed to examine a novel target-oriented TNBC classification to further facilitate targeted therapy by classifying TNBC based on the breast cancer 1 (BRCA1)-like as well as the protein expression of HER2, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), androgen receptor (AR), cytokeratin 5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We enrolled 17 patients with primary TNBC who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy and underwent surgery at the Kobe University Hospital, Japan, between January 1, 2018, and July 31, 2019. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on tumor specimens, while a BRCAness test was performed using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis. A BRCAness score 0.5 or higher was considered BRCA1-like. Tumors were classified as HER2-low (immunohistochemistry score 1+ or 2+ and FISH negative), PD-L1 positive, AR positive, or BRCA1-like. HER2-low, PD-L1 positive, AR positive, and BRCA1-like were detected in 11 (64.7%), 4 (23.5%), 6 (35.3%), and 6 (35.3%) samples. The tumor of only one patient could not be classified into any of these categories. Almost all TNBC cases can be classified according to treatable targets.