Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Genotype Research Articles

Unveiling Discrepant and Rare Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPYD) Results Using an In-House Genotyping Test: A Case Series.

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is a primary component of many solid tumor treatment regimens, particularly those for gastrointestinal malignancies. Approximately one-third of patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies experience serious adverse effects. This risk is substantially higher in patients carrying DPYD genetic variants, which cause reduced fluoropyrimidine metabolism and inactivation (ie, dihydropyridine dehydrogenase [DPD] deficiency). Despite the known relationship between DPD deficiency and severe toxicity risk, including drug-related fatalities, pretreatment DPYD testing is not standard of care in the United States. We developed an in-house DPYD genotyping test that detects 5 clinically actionable variants associated with DPD deficiency, and genotyped 827 patients receiving fluoropyrimidines, of which 49 (6%) were identified as heterozygous carriers. We highlight 3 unique cases: (1) a patient with a false-negative result from a commercial laboratory that only tested for the c.1905 + 1G>A (*2A) variant, (2) a White patient in whom the c.557A>G variant (typically observed in people of African ancestry) was detected, and (3) a patient with the rare c.1679T>G (*13) variant. Lastly, we evaluated which DPYD variants are detected by commercial laboratories offering DPYD genotyping in the United States and found 6 of 13 (46%) did not test for all 5 variants included on our panel. We estimated that 20.4% to 81.6% of DPYD heterozygous carriers identified on our panel would have had a false-negative result if tested by 1 of these 6 laboratories. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the diagnostic tests from these laboratories ranged from 18.4% to 79.6% and 95.1% to 98.7%, respectively. These cases underscore the importance of comprehensive DPYD genotyping to accurately identify patients with DPD deficiency who may require lower fluoropyrimidine doses to mitigate severe toxicities and hospitalizations. Clinicians should be aware of test limitations and variability in variant detection by commercial laboratories, and seek assistance by pharmacogenetic experts or available resources for test selection and result interpretation.

Complete DPYD genotyping combined with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping to prevent fluoropyrimidine toxicity: A retrospective study.

In April 2019, French authorities mandated dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) screening, specifically testing uracilemia, to mitigate the risk of toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, this subject is still of debate as there is no consensus on a standardized DPD deficiency screening test. We conducted a real-life retrospective study with the aim of assessing the impact of DPD screening on the occurrence of severe toxicity and exploring the potential benefits of complete genotyping using next-generation sequencing. All adult patients consecutively treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or its oral prodrug at six cancer centers between March 2018 and February 2019 were considered for inclusion. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency screening included gene encoding DPD (DPYD) genotyping using complete genome sequencing and DPD phenotyping (uracilemia or dihydrouracilemia/uracilemia ratio) or both tests. Associations between each DPD screening method and (i) severe (grade ≥3) early toxicity and (ii) fluoropyrimidine dose reduction in the second chemotherapy cycle were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the concordance between DPD genotype and phenotype using Cohen's kappa. A total of 551 patients were included. Most patients were tested for DPD deficiency (86%) including DPYD genotyping only (6%), DPD phenotyping only (8%), or both (72%). Complete DPD deficiency was not detected in the study population. Severe early toxicity events were observed in 73 patients (13%), with two patients (0.30%) presenting grade 5 toxicity. Despite the numerically higher toxicity rate in untested patients, the occurrence of severe toxicity was not significantly associated with the DPD screening method (p = 0.69). Concordance between the DPD genotype and phenotype was weak (Cohen's kappa of 0.14). Due to insufficient numbers, our study was not able to demonstrate any added value of DPYD genotyping using complete genome sequencing to prevent 5-FU toxicity. The optimal strategy for DPD screening before fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy requires further clinical evaluation.

Genetic Variation in miR-27a Is Associated with Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Toxicity in Patients with Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Variants after Genotype-Guided Dose Reduction.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) is the rate-limiting enzyme involved in the metabolism of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in DPYD only partially explain fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity. The expression of DPYD has previously been shown to be regulated by microRNA-27a (miR-27a) and a common miR-27a SNV (rs895819) has been associated with an increased risk of toxicity in patients harboring a DPYD variant who received standard fluoropyrimidine dosing. We investigated if the miR-27a rs895819 SNV was associated with toxicity in DPYD wildtype patients and carriers of DPYD variants who received a reduced dose. The regulation of DPYD using miR-27a was investigated in HepG2 cells utilizing a miR-27a mimic. miR-27a overexpression decreased DPYD mRNA expression compared to control cells (p < 0.0001). In a cohort of patients that received pre-emptive DPYD genotyping, 45 patients had a DPYD variant and 180 were wildtype. Patients heterozygous for rs895819 had an increased risk of toxicity, which was seen in both patients who were wildtype for DPYD variants (OR (95%CI) = 1.99 (1.00-3.99)) and DPYD variant carriers (OR (95%CI) = 8.10 (1.16-86.21)). Therefore, miR-27a rs895819 may be a clinically relevant predictor of fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicities. Furthermore, toxicity was more profound in DPYD variant carriers, even after DPYD genotype-guided dose reduction. This suggests that patients may benefit from miR-27a genotyping to guide fluoropyrimidine dosing.

Implementation of upfront DPYD genotyping with a low-cost and high-throughput assay to guide fluoropyrimidine treatment in cancer patients.

Genetic variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene are associated with reduced dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity and can cause severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. We assessed the frequency of the four most common and well-established DPYD variants associated with fluoropyrimidine toxicity and implemented a relatively low-cost and high-throughput genotyping assay for their detection. This study includes 457 patients that were genotyped for the DPYD c.1129-5923C>G, c.1679T>G, c.1905 + 1G>A and c.2846A>T variants, either by Sanger sequencing or kompetitive allele specific PCR (KASP) technology. Of these, 172 patients presented toxicity during treatment with fluoropyrimidines (post-treatment group), and 285 were tested before treatment (pretreatment group). Heterozygous DPYD variants were identified in 7.4% of the entire series of 457 patients, being the c.2846A>T the most frequent variant. In the post-treatment group, 15.7% of the patients presented DPYD variants, whereas only 2.5% of the patients in the pretreatment group presented a variant. The KASP assays designed in this study presented 100% genotype concordance with the results obtained by Sanger sequencing. The combined assessment of the four DPYD variants in our population increases the identification of patients at high risk for developing fluoropyrimidine toxicity, supporting the upfront routine implementation of DPYD variant genotyping. Furthermore, the KASP genotyping assay described in this study presents a rapid turnaround time and relatively low cost, making upfront DPYD screening feasible in clinical practice.

Allelic Frequency of DPYD Genetic Variants in Patients With Cancer in Spain: The PhotoDPYD Study.

Identifying polymorphisms in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene is gaining importance to be able to predict fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. The aim of this project was to describe the frequency of the DPYD variants DPYD*2A (rs3918290); c.1679T>G (rs55886062); c.2846A>T (rs67376798) and c.1129-5923C>G (rs75017182; HapB3) in the Spanish oncological patients. Cross-sectional and multicentric study (PhotoDPYD study) conducted in hospitals located in Spain designed to register the frequency of the most relevant DPYD genetic variants in oncological patients. All oncological patients with DPYD genotype were recruited in the participant hospitals. The measures determined where the presence or not of the 4 DPYD previously described variants. Blood samples from 8054 patients with cancer from 40 different hospitals were used to determine the prevalence of the 4 variants located in the DPYD gene. The frequency of carriers of one defective DPYD variant was 4.9%. The most frequently identified variant was c.1129-5923C>G (rs75017182) (HapB3), in 2.9%, followed by c.2846A>T (rs67376798) in 1.4%, c.1905 + 1G>A (rs3918290, DPYD*2A) in 0.7% and c.1679T>G (rs55886062) in 0.2% of the patients. Only 7 patients (0.08%) were carrying the c.1129-5923C>G (rs75017182) (HapB3) variant, 3 (0.04%) the c.1905 + 1G>A (rs3918290, DPYD*2A) and one (0.01%) the DPYD c.2846A>T (rs67376798, p.D949V) variant in homozygosis. Moreover, 0.07% were compound heterozygous patients, 3 carrying the DPYD variants DPYD*2A + c.2846A>T, 2 the DPYD c.1129-5923C>G + c.2846A>T and one the DPYD*2A + c.1129-5923C>G variants. Our results demonstrate the relatively high frequency of DPYD genetic variants in the Spanish patient with cancer population, which highlights the relevance of their determination before initiating a fluoropirimidine-containing regimen.

Pharmacogenetics and Adverse Events in the Use of Fluoropyrimidine in a Cohort of Cancer Patients on Standard of Care Treatment in Zimbabwe.

Fluoropyrimidines are commonly used in the treatment of colorectal cancer. They are, however, associated with adverse events (AEs), of which gastrointestinal, myelosuppression and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia are the most common. Clinical guidelines are used for fluoropyrimidine dosing based on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genetic polymorphism and have been shown to reduce these AEs in patients of European ancestry. This study aimed to evaluate, for the first time, the clinical applicability of these guidelines in a cohort of cancer patients on fluoropyrimidine standard of care treatment in Zimbabwe. DNA was extracted from whole blood and used for DPYD genotyping. Adverse events were monitored for six months using the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v.5.0. None of the 150 genotyped patients was a carrier of any of the pathogenic variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, rs67376798, or rs75017182). However, severe AEs were high (36%) compared to those reported in the literature from other populations. There was a statistically significant association between BSA (p = 0.0074) and BMI (p = 0.0001) with severe global AEs. This study has shown the absence of the currently known actionable DPYD variants in the Zimbabwean cancer patient cohort. Therefore, the current pathogenic variants in the guidelines might not be feasible for all populations hence the call for modification of the current DPYD guidelines to include minority populations for the benefit of all diverse patients.

Poor association between dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genotype and fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity in an Asian population.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genotype is closely associated with fluoropyrimidine (FP)-induced toxicities in Caucasian population and European Medicines Agency now recommends DPYD genotype-based FP dosing strategy. The current study aimed to investigate their impact on FP-related toxicities in an Asian population using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data set from 1364 patients with colon cancer. Among 82 variants registered in the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, 74 DPYD variants were directly genotyped in GWAS cohort; however, only 7 nonsynonymous DPYD variants (CPIC variants) were identified and none of the four recurrent DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A) were included. Seven CPIC variants were investigated for their association with the incidence of FP-related toxicities; however, none of these variants revealed a significant correlation with FP-related toxicities. These data suggested that the DPYD genotype registered in CPIC plays a minor role in FP-related toxicities in an Asian population.

Fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity and DPYD variants c.85T>C, c.496A>G, and c.1236G>A: impact of haplotype.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) is the rate-limiting step in fluoropyrimidines metabolism. Currently, genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine dosing is recommended for four DPYD single nucleotide variants (SNVs). However, the clinical impact of additional DPYD SNVs on fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity remains controversial. We assessed common DPYD SNVs c.85T>C, and c.496A>G which are often in linkage disequilibrium with c.1236G>A, a variant currently recommended for DPYD genotyping, in a retrospective cohort of cancer patients who had received fluoropyrimidines (N = 1371). When assessing individual SNVs, during the total chemotherapy treatment period, a significant increased risk of severe grade ≥ 3 toxicity was seen in carriers of c.496A>G (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.88, p = 0.0405) after adjusting for age, sex and treatment drug (capecitabine or 5-Fluorouracil). No association with fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was seen in patients given standard dosing among those carrying one allele of DPYD c.1236G>A (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.59-2.27, p = 0.6147) or c.85T>C (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.80-1.62, p = 0.7536). Haplotype analysis confirmed a high linkage disequilibrium of these three variants. Toxicity was not significantly increased in haplotypes containing only one of c.85T>C or c.496A>G or c.1236G>A alleles. However, the haplotype containing both c.85T>C and c.496A>G alleles, which had a predicted frequency of 7.1%, was associated with an increased risk of fluoropyrimidine toxicity (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.15-2.13, p = 0.0041). This study suggests DPYD haplotype structure may help explain previous conflicting studies concerning the impact of these variants. Our findings suggest patients with both DPYD c.85T>C and c.496A>G variants have a significant increased risk for toxicity and may potentially benefit from genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine dosing.

Optimizing the prescription doses and tolerability of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer patients.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck accounts for 330 000 deaths and 650 000 cases worldwide annually. Systemic therapy is an essential pillar of multimodal therapy despite being accompanied with substantial toxicity. This article reviews the latest advances in systemic therapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced and reccurent/metastatic head and neck cancer from a tolerability perspective. Multiple recent attempts have been made to optimize tolerability (and efficacy) of systemic therapy utilizing new regimens, modified prescription doses, drugs such as immunotherapies or genotyping to tailor the systemic therapy to the individual patient. Although treatment benefit has to be weighed against potential toxicity, it is reasonable to anticipate potential side effects of systemic therapies. In a vulnerable elderly or Asian patient population upfront dose modifications of cytotoxic chemotherapies might be reasonable. Special attention should be laid on the patient's nutritional status and early intervention recommended. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotyping can predict 5-fluorouracil toxicity and identify patients for whom alternative regimens are more suitable. As for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, despite being well tolerated, the identification of biomarkers to predict reduced tolerability or severe toxicity would be highly desirable.

Impact of pretreatment dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine dosing on chemotherapy associated adverse events.

Consensus guidelines exist for genotype‐guided fluoropyrimidine dosing based on variation in the gene dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD). However, these guidelines have not been widely implemented in North America and most studies of pretreatment DPYD screening have been conducted in Europe. Given regional differences in treatment practices and rates of adverse events (AEs), we investigated the impact of pretreatment DPYD genotyping on AEs in a Canadian context. Patients referred for DPYD genotyping prior to fluoropyrimidine treatment were enrolled from December 2013 through November 2019 and followed until completion of fluoropyrimidine treatment. Patients were genotyped for DPYD c.1905+1G>A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Genotype‐guided dosing recommendations were informed by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AE (grade ≥3, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0). Secondary outcomes included early severe AEs, severe AEs by toxicity category, discontinuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment due to AEs, and fluoropyrimidine‐related death. Among 1394 patients, mean (SD) age was 64 (12) years, 764 (54.8%) were men, and 47 (3.4%) were DPYD variant carriers treated with dose reduction. Eleven variant carriers (23%) and 418 (31.0%) noncarriers experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AE (p = 0.265). Six carriers (15%) and 284 noncarriers (21.1%) experienced early severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AEs (p = 0.167). DPYD variant carriers treated with genotype‐guided dosing did not experience an increased risk for severe AEs. Our data support a role for DPYD genotyping in the use of fluoropyrimidines in North America.

648P - Feasibility and impact of prospective DPYD screening in the Irish population

BackgroundGenetic variants of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene can result in varied enzymatic activity and potential toxicity when receiving 5-FU chemotherapy including treatment related death in up to 1% patients. Current international guidelines suggest an international rate of 3-5% albeit routine prospective pharmacogenomic testing is not currently recommended. However, in a genetically homogenous population such as Ireland, DPYD variant enrichment may support routine testing. MethodsAll patients receiving 5-FU based chemotherapy in South & South-West region of Ireland were prospectively tested from 01/09/2018 to present. The Viapath DPYD genotyping panel which interrogates for 5 variants was used. Toxicity type and grade for all patients were recorded (CTCAE v5.0). ResultsTo date, 139 patients have been tested,50.4% male and 49.6% female, median age 63 years. The majority(59%) were being treated for colorectal cancer. Sixteen patients were found to be heterozygous carriers of a DYPD variant with one compound heterozygous variant identified i.e. an overall prevalence of 12 %. No homozygous carriers were identified. Grade ≥3 was observed in 33% DPYD variant carriers compared to 19% in DPYD wild type patients i.e. relative risk of grade ≥3 toxicity is 1.7, p=0.17.Table648PTableDPYD VariantsPrevalence % n=139% Rate of ≥ G3 toxicity7(5.0%)42%c. 2846A>T1(0.7%)n/a*c. 1905+1G>A3(2.2%)100%c. 1679T>G0 (0%)n/a*c. 1601GA5 (3.6%)0%c. 1905+1G>A+c;1236G>A/Hapb3 compound heterozygous1(0.7%)n/a*TOTAL:17 (12.2%) ConclusionsThe study shows a higher than expected prevalence of DPYD variants of 12.2% compared to internationally reported 3-5%. Patients with DPYD variants c.1236G>A and c.1905+1G>A were particularly likely to develop Grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Prospective testing continues to assess the clinical relevance of individual variants in our population.Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

593P - Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) determination prior the administration of medicines containing fluorouracil: A single Spanish hospital experience

BackgroundSevere toxicity as a result of Fluoropyrimidine treatments appears in up 30% of patients. The reduce activity of DPD is one of the main cause of severe adverse events. Up to 8% of the population have low levels of DPD, and up to 0.5% of the population completely lack the enzyme. We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the 4 most relevant variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905+1G>A, IVS14+1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) and rs34743033 TYMS, on patient safety and dose individualization in daily clinical practice. MethodsWe described our experience in a Tertiary University Hospital. We reviewed 208 patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were planned to receive fluoropyrimide treatment and we did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS. Heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care. ResultsFrom April 2017 to March 2019, 208 patients were pre-tested. 8 patients (3´8%) were heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers and 200 (96´2%) were DPD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPD variant carriers (2 [25%] of 8 patients) than in wild-type patients (70 [35%] of 200 patients). 2 patients with c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS heterozygous were necessary to disrupt treatment in spite of dose reduction because of severe diarrhea. However, the other 6 heterozygous have low grade toxicity with reduction preplanned. ConclusionsLife-threatening toxicities could be presented in patients with DPD deficiency if they are treated with standar dose of fluoropyridimes. Last colorectal cancer ESMO guidelines do not recommend testing DPD deficient up front. It recommend in case of patients who experience severe toxicity, DPD levels should be tested before 5-FU is re-introduced. We suggest due to our control of potential toxicities that implementation of DPD genotype individualised dosing should be a new standard of care.Legal entity responsible for the study: Mediano Rambla. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Abstract P3-15-04: A French prospective pilot study to identify dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine

Abstract Background: Health Authorities point out that DPD deficiency confers a significant risk of major toxicity for patients receiving capecitabine. Identification of at-risk patients is thus of major concern. This multicentric prospective study of the French GPCO group (Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique, Unicancer) evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of DPD phenotyping and genotyping to predict severe cap-related toxixity in metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: 303 patients were included between February 2009 and February 2011 (15 institutions). Eighty-eight% received capecitabine as monotherapy, 28% were treated as first line (mean dose at 1st cycle 1957 mg/m2/d). Pre-treatment uracil (U, physiological DPD substrate) plasma concentration was measured in 286 patients (HPLC assay). DPD genotyping (IVS14+1G&amp;gt;A, 2846A&amp;gt;T, 1679T&amp;gt;G, 464T&amp;gt;A) was performed on 281 patients. Severe toxicity (G3-4 CTCAE v3 criteria) was measured over cycles 1-2. Results: Grade 3-4 toxicity (diarrhea, vomiting, hematoxicity, hand-foot syndrome) has been observed in 19.6% of patients (one toxic death). A marked trend for higher U concentrations has been noted in patients developing severe toxicity vs those who didn't (median 12.7 ng/ml (Q1-Q3 9-17) vs median 10.2 ng/ml (range 8-13), respectively, p = 0.014). However, ROC curve has showed that this difference was too small for use as a reliable toxicity predictor. The patient with toxic death had an elevated U concentration at 17 ng/ml. Among the 7 patients with a DPD mutation (3 pts IVS14+1, 3 pts 2846A&amp;gt;T, one 1679T&amp;gt;G, all heterozygous), 5 developed severe toxicity (including the toxic death, 2846A&amp;gt;T), one did not, and the last one was not documented. Relative risk for developing severe toxicity was 4.60 in mutated patients vs wild-type patients (95%CI 2.95-7.16, p = 0.001); positive and negative predictive values were 83.3% and 81.9%, respectively; specificity was 99.5% and sensitivity was 9.8%. Conclusions: Breast cancer patients harbouring a DPD variant allele are at risk to develop severe, up to lethal, capecitabine-related toxicity. Pre-treatment U measurement remains to be more firmly established as a reliable predictor of capecitabine toxicity. These observations are of major interest for breast cancer patients candidate for capecitabine therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-15-04.

A French prospective pilot study for identifying dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in breast cancer patients (pts) receiving capecitabine (cap).

e13519 Background: For fluoropyrimidines, and especially cap, Health Authorities point out that DPD deficiency confers a significant risk of major toxicity (tox). Identification of at-risk pts is thus relevant. This multicentric prospective study of the French GPCO group (Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique, Unicancer) evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of DPD phenotyping and genotyping for predicting severe cap-related tox in metastatic breast cancer pts. Methods: 303 pts were included (15 institutions), 88% received cap as monotherapy, 28% were treated as first line (mean dose at 1st cycle 1957 mg/m2/d). Pre-treatment dihydrouracil (UH2) and uracil (U) plasma concentrations were measured in 286 pts (HPLC assay). DPD genotyping (IVS14+1G&gt;A, 2846A&gt;T, 1679T&gt;G, 464T&gt;A) was done on 281 pts. Severe tox (G3-4 CTCAE v3 criteria) was measured over cycles 1-2. Results: Grade 3-4 tox (diarrhea, vomiting, hematoxicity, hand-foot syndrome) was observed in 19.6% of pts (one toxic death). A marked trend for higher U (median 12.7 vs 10.2 ng/ml, p=0.014) and UH2 (median 110 vs 93 ng/ml, p=0.011) concentrations was observed in pts developing severe tox vs those who didn’t. However, ROC curves showed that these differences were too small for use as reliable tox predictors. The distribution of UH2/U ratio was similar between pts with or without tox (median 9.1 vs 9.6, respectively, p=0.80). The patient with toxic death had a UH2/U ratio of 6.5 and U concentration of 17 ng/ml. Among the 7 pts with a DPD mutation (3 pts IVS14+1, 3 pts 2846A&gt;T, one 1679T&gt;G, all heterozygous), 5 developed severe tox (including toxic death, 2846A&gt;T), one did not, and the last one was not documented. Relative risk for developing severe tox was 4.60 in mut pts vs wt pts (95%CI 2.95-7.16, p=0.001); positive and negative predictive values were 83.3% and 81.9%, respectively; specificity was 99.5% and sensitivity was 9.8%. Conclusions: These data point out that breast cancer pts harbouring a DPD variant allele are candidate to develop severe, up to lethal, cap-related tox. In contrast, pre-treatment UH2/U ratio and U measurements are not reliable predictors of cap tox. Clinical trial information: Eudract 2008-004136-20.

Gender-specific elimination of continuous-infusional 5-fluorouracil in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: results from a prospective population pharmacokinetic study

This study was initiated to assess the quantitative impact of patient anthropometrics and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) mutations on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and to explore limited sampling strategies of 5FU. We included 32 patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, receiving 46-h continuous-infusional 5FU and performed PK-sampling at baseline, 15, 30, 45 min, 1 and 2 h after the start of infusion and at the end of infusion, for 2 subsequent cycles. Plasma concentrations of 5FU, 5-fluorodihydrouracil (5FUH2), uracil (U) and 5,6-dihydrouracil (UH2) were determined using LC-MS/MS and submitted to population PK analysis using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Broad genotyping of DPYD was performed, and the potential impact of the DPYD genotype on the elimination of 5FU was assessed. Limited sampling strategies were evaluated for their accuracy to predict steady-state concentrations of 5FU (CSS(5FU)), using data simulations based on the final PK-model. The area-under-the concentration-time curve of 5FU (AUC(5FU)) was found to be <20 mg h/L in 33 occasions (58 %), between 20 and 30 mg h/L in 17 occasions (30 %) and >30 mg h/L in 7 occasions (12 %). Men had a 26 % higher elimination of 5FU and a 18 % higher apparent elimination of 5FUH2. Accordingly, women had a higher AUC(5FU) compared to men (22 vs. 18 mg h/L, p = 0.04). No DPYD risk variants were found, and the DPYD variants detected (c.496A>G, c.1601G>A, c.1627A>G) were not significantly associated with the elimination of 5FU. Individual baseline UH(2)/U ratio was significantly associated with AUC(5FU) (R = -0.49, p < 0.001). Limited sampling strategies with time-points <3 h after the start of infusion were not adequate to predict CSS(5FU). Female gender was the only predictor of nausea/emesis in the multivariate model. Gender-specific elimination of 5FU is supported by the present data and may partly explain the gender-specific association between DPYD risk variants and 5FU-specific toxicity.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Genotyping and Phenotyping for 5- Fluorouracil Dysmetabolism: Moving Towards Personalized Chemotherapy in Patients with Cancer

Whether theranostic testing to discern person-to-person and population differences in drug metabolism pathways offers clinical guidance in oncology for fluoropyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains an open question. Extensive basic and clinical studies have been performed over the past several decades with regard to personalizing treatment with fluoropyrimidines, optimizing patients quality of life and reducing risks for severe and fatal toxic events. A variety of genetic variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene were thus identified, and have been clustered according to their clinical and predictive value. However, further research is still needed as the DPYD gene is highly variable, complicating the attempts to establish genotype-phenotype correlations. Therefore, to individualise 5-FU therapy, several integrative/complementary approaches appear to be indicated to determine the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase metabolizer status. In principle, these diagnostic approaches in assessing dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity include genotyping and phenotyping for the DPYD. This paper presents a critical summary and evaluation of the current state of research on both DPYD genotyping and phenotyping, and the pharmacogenetic syndrome of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency more generally. For DPYD based personalized medicine diagnostics to advance forward to become standard state of the art in routine testing, we also suggest the need for additional genetic, biological and clinical characterization of this pharmacologically significant variation across different global populations.

Pharmacokinetics, a main actor in a many‐sided approach to severe 5‐FU toxicity prediction

Pharmacokinetics, a main actor in a many‐sided approach to severe 5‐FU toxicity prediction

Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS) and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPYD) Polymorphisms in the Korean Population for Prediction of 5-Fluorouracil-Associated Toxicity

The important cellular proteins for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism are the major target enzymes, thymidylate synthase, and the rate-limiting enzyme in the degradation pathway, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. Adverse drug reactions to 5-FU-based chemotherapy have been reported to be in part the result of polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase (TYMS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genes. Therefore, we examined the type and frequency of polymorphisms in the TYMS and DPYD genes in 100 healthy Korean individuals and compared these findings with 21 patients with colorectal cancer who had a grade 3 or greater toxic response to 5-FU treatment. Genotyping analysis of the promotor enhancer region (TSER) and the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of the TYMS gene as well as haplotype analysis were conducted in all 121 study participants. For the TSER and the 3'-UTR of the TYMS gene, similar genotypes and allele frequencies were observed in control subjects and patients. For the haplotype analysis of the single nucleotide polymorphism G > C at the 12th nucleotide of the second repeat of the 3R allele of the TSER, different haplotype frequencies were noted in comparisons between the two groups; in addition, we found that the 3RC-del 6bp was significantly associated with severe toxicity with 5-FU treatment. Extensive polymorphisms in the DPYD gene were observed; in addition, four polymorphisms were related to the known DPYD allelic variants or to allelic variants that alter protein structure, among which the most common polymorphism was 1627A > G, observed in 20.5% of all alleles. The 496A > G allele and a novel 1774C > T allele were identified in two patients. The DPYD*2A allele, causing exon 14 skipping, was not identified in the study group. The findings, from Korean patients with colon cancer, suggest that polymorphisms of the DPYD gene are not associated with an increased risk for toxic response to 5-FU. These findings suggest that there may be an important relationship between the TYMS haplotypes examined and 5-FU toxicity. The novel variant in the DPYD gene, identified in this study, should be further investigated to confirm its functional significance. A large sample is required before DPYD or TYMS genotyping could be used as markers for individualized treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.

Polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genes predict response and toxicity to capecitabine-raltitrexed in colorectal cancer

Pharmacogenetics is an increasingly useful field where the genetic studies are becoming an important tool for predicting drug toxicity and/or efficacy. Thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene polymorphisms could be highly informative tools in the clinical handling of colorectal cancer patients, who are following fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy. Fifty-eight patients, with non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer, were treated with capecitabine and raltitrexed, every three weeks. Patients were divided in a good-response group (complete and partial response) and a poor-response group (stable and progression). A genotype panel TS-DPD was evaluated. Results show that TS genotype analysis clearly differentiates patients with a worst response to a 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. DPD genotype was shown to be highly informative for prediction of toxicity of the treatment. These polymorphisms could represent an accurate, rapid and effective determination panel, indicative of resistance and toxicity for patients undergoing fluoropyrimidine based treatment.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase polymorphisms and their association with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

The causes of interpatient variation in severe toxicity resulting from treatment with weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/ leucovorin (LV) are poorly understood. This study was undertaken to examine the contribution of commonly occurring polymorphisms in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene to interpatient variability in 5-FU pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Patients with stage III/IV colorectal cancer were treated by bolus intravenous (I.V.) injection with 500 mg/m2 doses of 5-FU and LV once every week. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU was determined on weeks 1 and 4. Genotyping assays were developed for 8 polymorphisms in the DPYD gene. A well-characterized functional polymorphism in the 5' untranslated region of the thymidylate synthase (TS) gene was also analyzed. A cohort of 22 patients (15 male, 7 female) with a median age of 61 years was evaluated. Although there was no relationship between the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) for the first dose of 5-FU and worst-grade toxicity during the first cycle of therapy, 3 of the 4 patients in whom the AUC on week 4 was more than equal to 5 microgram/h/mL greater than the value for the first dose experienced grade 3/4 toxicity during subsequent treatment. Among the 8 polymorphisms in the DPYD gene, 7 were found to vary in the study population but none were significantly associated with the AUC of 5-FU. There was no relationship between the DPYD and TS genotypes examined and 5-FU toxicity. Extensive polymorphism in the DPYD gene was observed; however, no conclusive correlations existed between the DPYD and TS genotype and 5-FU pharmacokinetics or toxicity. Decreases in 5-FU clearance in certain patients may provide insight into the increased toxicity following repetitive cycles of treatment with weekly I.V. bolus 5-FU. The present study offers useful themes for undertaking larger prospective pharmacogenetic studies in the future.