Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity Research Articles

Personalized Chronomodulated 5-Fluorouracil Treatment: A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Precision Dosing Approach for Optimizing Cancer Therapy.

The discovery of circadian clock genes greatly amplified the study of diurnal variations impacting cancer therapy, transforming it into a rapidly growing field of research. Especially, use of chronomodulated treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has gained significance. Studies indicate high interindividual variability (IIV) in diurnal variations in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity - a key enzyme for 5-FU metabolism. However, the influence of individual DPD chronotypes on chronomodulated therapy remains unclear and warrants further investigation. To optimize precision dosing of chronomodulated 5-FU, this study aims to: (i) build physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for 5-FU, uracil, and their metabolites, (ii) assess the impact of diurnal variation on DPD activity, (iii) estimate individual DPD chronotypes, and (iv) personalize chronomodulated 5-FU infusion rates based on a patient's DPD chronotype. Whole-body PBPK models were developed with PK-Sim(R) and MoBi(R). Sinusoidal functions were used to incorporate variations in enzyme activity and chronomodulated infusion rates as well as to estimate individual DPD chronotypes from DPYD mRNA expression or DPD enzymatic activity. Four whole-body PBPK models for 5-FU, uracil, and their metabolites were established utilizing data from 41 5-FU and 10 publicly available uracil studies. IIV in DPD chronotypes was assessed and personalized chronomodulated administrations were developed to achieve (i) comparable 5-FU peak plasma concentrations, (ii) comparable 5-FU exposure, and (iii) constant 5-FU plasma levels via "noise cancellation" chronomodulated infusion. The developed PBPK models capture the extent of diurnal variations in DPD activity and can help investigate individualized chronomodulated 5-FU therapy through testing alternative personalized dosing strategies.

Effect of Liver Dysfunction on S-1 Therapy Induced Adverse Effects: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Renal dysfunction necessitates S-1 dose reduction. However, decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity may lead to adverse events due to 5-FU. The guidelines provided by pharmaceutical companies state that total bilirubin (T-Bil) should be ≤upper limit of normal (ULN)×1.5 as a reference value for safely taking S-1. Nevertheless, the relationship between the degree of liver dysfunction and S-1 dose reduction has not been clearly established. This study focused on patients who received S-1 monotherapy for various types of cancer. The primary outcome was defined as the variation between blood sampling results on the test day and the subsequent test. The variation data were categorized based on the difference in T-Bil: Low T-Bil group (≤2.25) and High T-Bil group (>2.25). The number of patients that underwent S-1 monotherapy was 883 and the running number was 7,511; Low T-Bil group included 7,245 and High T-Bil group included 266. Examination of the effect of the T-Bil Group on clinical outcomes revealed a correlation with red blood cell (RBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, and T-Bil level. When the impact of the interaction between the T-Bil Group and any of the clinical outcomes, such as the RBC count, PLT count, and T-Bil level, was determined, each outcome showed a significant decrease in the High T-Bil group compared with the Low T-Bil group. S-1 administration in patients with liver dysfunction accompanied by elevated T-Bil levels may cause thrombocytopenia.

Thymidylate Synthase Inhibition with Capped F10 Is Effective in TP53 Null Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer of the myeloid linage characterized by progressive marrow failure and death. Responses to therapy are between 50 and 80% but relapse is common and salvage rates once relapsed are low. The risk of relapse is greatly influenced by specific somatic mutations. One of the highest risk mutations in AML involves loss of the tumor suppressor TP53. Patients with AML harboring loss of TP53 function have a dismal prognosis and there is a clear need for new approaches. To identify novel agents with activity against TP53 null AML, a TP53 null and WT isogenic cell line pair was generated using CRISPR/CAS9 in a genetically defined murine AML cell line. Clonal isolates were generated by serial dilution and loss of detectable TP53 was confirmed by Western blotting. A high throughput screen of currently FDA approved agents was performed on these cell lines. When agents were ranked by equal cytotoxicity against TP53 null and WT AML cells 20% (6/30) of the top 30 agents either directly targeted thymidylate synthase or its substrates via inhibition of the folate cycle. This finding suggests that thymidylate synthase (TS) is a key enzyme in TP53 null AML cells. To confirm and extend these results, an additional murine AML TP53 null/WT cell line pair was generated. Chemotherapy resistance was confirmed in the TP53 null cell lines when treated with doxorubicin (Figure 1). Capped F10 (CF10) is a second generation fluoropyrimidine oligonucleotide that is a highly potent inhibitor of TS. In contrast to doxorubicin, CF10 treatment resulted in significant cell death when dosed in the low picomolar range with minimal differences between the null and WT cell lines (Figure 1). To extend this result TP53 null cells were injected into syngeneic recipients and upon engraftment mice were treated with CF10 at 300mg/kg twice weekly or doxorubicin 3mg/kg and cytarabine at 100 mg/kg daily for 5 days. CF10 provided a significant survival benefit in the TP53 null AML in this highly aggressive model where doxorubicin and cytarabine did not (p=0.0057, Figure 2). To confirm a TP53 independent mechanism, competition assays were performed with CAS9 expressing AML cells partially infected with a vector expressing an sgRNA targeting TP53 and containing a GFP reporter. When the mixed population was treated with a titration of doxorubicin there was a highly significant increase in GFP+ cells indicating the involvement of TP53 in doxorubicin mediated cell death. In contrast when cells were treated with a titration of CF10 there was a no significant increase in GFP+ population consistent with CF10 inducing a TP53 independent mechanism of cell death. For CF10 to of use clinically there must be an acceptable therapeutic window. Fluoropyrimidine based therapy can be myelosuppressive especially in patients with low dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. To assess the tolerability of CF10, healthy WAG/RAJ rats were treated with the DPD inhibitor ethynyl uracil at 2mg/kg to mimic DPD deficiency. Animals were then treated with repeated doses of either 141 mg/kg CF10 or the molar equivalent of 50 mg/kg 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and weight determined. In contrast to 5-FU, CF10 treated animals maintained their weight compared to controls (data not shown). Taken together these data suggest that TS is a viable target in TP53 null AML and CF10 is well tolerated and provides a survival benefit in a highly aggressive, chemotherapy resistant model. Ongoing studies will explore the mechanisms involved in CF10 induced cell death.

DPYD variant testing in candidates for fluoropyrimidine treatment: A study protocol

ObjectiveThe main purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential clinical impact of pharmacogenetic testing on the reduction of the toxicity in patients treated with fluoropyrimidines. This will be achieved by comparing the frequency of adverse events and the incidence of toxicity of two groups of patients that will differ from each other only in that one will receive pharmacogenetic counseling. The hypothesis is that availability of a pharmacogenetic report prior to treatment initiation has a positive effect. One of the main secondary goals is to analyze allele frequencies and the association of polymorphisms rs895819 (miR27A) and rs1801160 (DPYD*6) with toxicity by conducting an observational study to determine their clinical relevance and standardize a dose adjustment recommendation. MethodThe study has an single-center ambispective, quasi-experimental design and is based on a multidisciplinary protocol involving implementation and standardization of DPYD*2A; DPYD*13; c.2846A>T; and HapB3 measurements. Following these measurements, pharmacogenetic counseling will be carried out and its clinical impact will be evaluated. The primary endpoint of the study is severe toxicity and/or mortality. The toxicity observed in two groups with similar epidemiological characteristics will be compared: the intervention group (candidates for treatment with fluoropyrimidines who will be subjected to the protocol) and the control group (retrospective cohort). Additionally, rs895819 (MIR27A) and rs1801160 (DPYD*6) will be determined. Testing for these variants is not part of the hospital's daily practice, nor are they included in clinical guidelines. However, according to recently published studies, the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase might be affected by these variants, as they may be associated with toxicity. The results of the measurements of these two variants will not be incorporated to pharmacogenetics counseling until their association with toxicity is determined by means of the observational study to be conducted. The project, as well as the patient information sheet and the informed consent form, were approved by the Ethics Committee of the participating center (code 20/006).

Implementing pharmacogenetic testing in fluoropyrimidine-treated cancer patients: DPYD genotyping to guide chemotherapy dosing in Greece.

Introduction: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by DPYD gene, is the rate-limiting enzyme responsible for fluoropyrimidine (FP) catabolism. DPYD gene variants seriously affect DPD activity and are well validated predictors of FP-associated toxicity. DPYD variants rs3918290, rs55886062, rs67376798, and rs75017182 are currently included in FP genetic-based dosing guidelines and are recommended for genotyping by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) before treatment initiation. In Greece, however, no data exist on DPYD genotyping. The aim of the present study was to analyze prevalence of DPYD rs3918290, rs55886062, rs67376798, rs75017182, and, additionally, rs1801160 variants, and assess their association with FP-induced toxicity in Greek cancer patients. Methods: Study group consisted of 313 FP-treated cancer patients. DPYD genotyping was conducted on QuantStudio ™ 12K Flex Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific) using the TaqMan® assays C__30633851_20 (rs3918290), C__11985548_10 (rs55886062), C__27530948_10 (rs67376798), C_104846637_10 (rs75017182) and C__11372171_10 (rs1801160). Results: Any grade toxicity (1-4) was recorded in 208 patients (66.5%). Out of them, 25 patients (12%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. DPYD EMA recommended variants were detected in 9 patients (2.9%), all experiencing toxicity (p = 0.031, 100% specificity). This frequency was found increased in grade 3-4 toxicity cases (12%, p = 0.004, 97.9% specificity). DPYD deficiency increased the odds of grade 3-4 toxicity (OR: 6.493, p = 0.014) and of grade 1-4 gastrointestinal (OR: 13.990, p = 0.014), neurological (OR: 4.134, p = 0.040) and nutrition/metabolism (OR: 4.821, p = 0.035) toxicities. FP dose intensity was significantly reduced in DPYD deficient patients (β = -0.060, p <0.001). DPYD rs1801160 variant was not associated with FP-induced toxicity or dose intensity. Triple interaction of DPYD*TYMS*MTHFR was associated with grade 3-4 toxicity (OR: 3.725, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Our findings confirm the clinical validity of DPYD reduced function alleles as risk factors for development of FP-associated toxicity in the Greek population. Pre-treatment DPYD genotyping should be implemented in clinical practice and guide FP dosing. DPYD*gene interactions merit further investigation as to their potential to increase the prognostic value of DPYD genotyping and improve safety of FP-based chemotherapy.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Prediction of 5-FU Pharmacokinetics in Cancer Patients with Hepatic Impairment After 5-FU and Capecitabine Administration.

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its prodrug capecitabine are commonly prescribed anti-tumor medications. We aimed to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of capecitabine-metabolites and 5-FU-metabolites to describe their pharmacokinetics in tumor and plasma of cancer patients with liver impairment. Models including the cancer compartment were developed in PK-Sim® and MoBi® and evaluated by R programming language with 25 oral capecitabine and 18 intravenous 5-FU studies for cancer patients with and without liver impairment. The PBPK models were constructed successfully as most simulated Cmax and AUClast were within two-fold error of observed values. The simulated alterations of tumor 5-FU Cmax and AUClast in cancer patients with severe liver injury compared with normal liver function were 1.956 and 3.676 after oral administration of capecitabine, but no significant alteration was observed after intravenous injection of 5-FU. Besides, 5-FU concentration in tumor tissue increases with higher tumor blood flow but not tumor size. Sensitivity analysis revealed that dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and other metabolic enzymes' activity, capecitabine intestinal permeability and plasma protein scale factor played a vital role in tumor and plasma 5-FU pharmacokinetics. PBPK model prediction suggests no dosage adaption of capecitabine or 5-FU is required for cancer patients with hepatic impairment but it would be reduced when the toxic reaction is observed. Furthermore, tumor blood flow rate rather than tumor size is critical for 5-FU concentration in tumor. In summary, these models could predict pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in tumor in cancer patients with varying characteristics in different scenarios.

Addressing Resistance to Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Addressing Resistance to Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Frequency of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in patients with colon cancer from a Mexican oncology center.

e15616 Background: Fluoropyrimidines are chemotherapeutic agents used in various types of cancer such as colorectal, breast, gastric, etc. Approximately 30% of patients treated with fluoropyrimidines present severe toxicity, which can lead to death in around 1% of them. Reduced activity of the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) can cause severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. The objective of this study was to identify the frequency of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in patients treated at an oncology center from Northeast Mexico. Methods: Retrospective and observational study of patients treated at the Centro Universitario contra el Cáncer (CUCC) in Monterrey, Mexico. Patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of colon cancer who were treated during 2021 with the diagnosis of colon and considered candidates for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (5-FU, capecitabine) were included. Pregnant patients were excluded. None of them had a DPYD testing performed. Results: We analyzed 88 patients, of whom 51 (58%) were men, 6 (7%) in stage I, 16 (18%) in stage II, 31 (35%) in stage III, and 35 (40%) in stage IV. The mean age was 59 years, 15 (17%) of them had a PS&gt;2, overall, 94% of patients received fluoropyrimidine-based CT, presenting up to 47 (57%) of toxicities, 26 (32%) in G1, 11 (13%) in G2, and 10 (12%) in G3; no G &gt; 4 toxicities were documented. There were 7 patients (9%) that required CT discontinuation due to toxicity at some point during their treatment (see Table 1). In the subgroup of patients in stage IV, 8 (24%) had PS&gt;2, and 6 (18%) of them had some mutational panel. Conclusions: This is one of the few descriptive studies of toxicities in a population from northeastern Mexico undergoing treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based CT, in which up to 9% of the patients discontinue treatment due to toxicity. Our findings evidence a high percentage of patients with fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. DPYD testing has not been widely adopted in most oncology centers in Mexico, mostly because of the limited access to genome sequencing. Genetic studies in this population could identify poor metabolizers patients with a high risk of toxicity before starting treatment. [Table: see text]

Capped F10, a novel DNA directed fluoropyrimidine, in TP53 mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

7046 Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by resistance to treatment and poor outcomes. One of the most devastating mutations in AML involves loss of the tumor suppressor TP53. AML harboring this loss carries a dismal prognosis and there is a clear need for new approaches. Methods: To identify new therapeutics, a TP53 null and WT isogenic cell line pair was generated using CRISPR/CAS9 using a murine AML cell line. Clonal isolates were obtained and loss of detectable TP53 was confirmed by Western Blotting. A high throughput screen of currently FDA approved anticancer agents was performed. Results: When agents were ranked by equal cytotoxicity against TP53 null and WT AML cells 20% (6/30) of the top 30 agents targeted the folate/thymidylate synthase axis. This suggests that thymidylate synthase (TS) is a vulnerability in TP53 null AML cells. To confirm TS as a target in TP53 null AML an additional murine AML TP53 null/WT cell line pair was generated using CRISPR/CAS9. When these cell lines were treated with doxorubicin the TP53 null cells were significantly more resistant (p≤0.001 at 10nM). Capped F10 (CF10) is a second generation fluoropyrimidine oligonucleotide that has been shown to be a highly potent inhibitor of TS. In contrast to doxorubicin, CF10 treatment resulted in significant cell death when dosed in the low picomolar range with minimal differences between the null and WT cell lines (p = 0.31 at 50pM). To extend this result TP53 WT or null cells were injected into syngeneic recipients and upon engraftment mice were treated with CF10 at 300mg/kg twice weekly. CF10 provided a significant survival benefit in the TP53 null but not WT injected mice consistent with CF10 having activity against TP53 null AML (p = 0.035 vs 0.13). To confirm a TP53 independent mechanism, competition assays were performed with CAS9 expressing AML cells partially infected with a vector expressing an sgRNA targeting TP53 and a GFP reporter. When the mixed population was treated with the IC90 concentration of 5-fluorouracil there was a highly significant increase in GFP+ cells indicating a TP53 mediated cell death (p = &lt; 0.001). In contrast when cells were treated with the IC90 concentration of CF10 there was a non-significant increase in GFP+ population (p = 0.074) consistent with a mainly TP53 independent mechanism. Fluoropyrimidine based therapy can be myelosuppressive especially in patients with low dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. To assess the tolerability of CF10, healthy WAG/RAJ rats were treated with the DPD inhibitor ethynyl uracil at 2mg/kg alone or in combination with either 141 mg/kg CF10 or the molar equivalent of 50 mg/kg 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and weight determined. In contrast to 5-FU, CF10 treated animals did not have a significant change in weight compared to controls. Conclusions: Taken together these data suggest that CF10 is a promising new agent for TP53 null AML.

Risk of severe toxicity from topical fluoropyrimidine treatment in patients carrying DPYD variant alleles.

12123 Background: Patients carrying variant alleles of DPYD that reduce activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase have unacceptably high risk of severe toxicity from systemic fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. DPYD testing prior to systemic fluoropyrimidine treatment is standard of care across Europe and is increasingly used in USA. There is a published case report of fatal toxicity from topical fluoropyridine chemotherapy in a DPYD variant carrier, but the risk of severe toxicity in these patients is unknown. This information is critical to determine whether patients receiving topical fluoropyrimidine treatment should also undergo DPYD genetic testing. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine whether patients carrying DPYD variant alleles have increased risk of severe toxicity from topical fluoropyrimidine treatment. Methods: Individuals who received topical fluoropyrimidine treatment at Michigan Medicine and had available DPYD genotype data, due to participation in the Michigan Genomics Initiative institutional genetic data repository, were eligible for this analysis. Clinical data for the first cycle of topical fluoropyrimidine treatment was abstracted from the electronic medical record by an investigator blinded to genetic data. Toxicities were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. The primary endpoint was grade 3+ toxicity. The secondary endpoint was grade 1+ toxicity. Genotypes for five validated decreased- or null-activity DPYD variant alleles were included: DPYD*2A (rs3918290), DPYD*13 (rs55886062), DPYD p.D949V (rs67376798) DPYD HapB3 (rs56038477) and DPYD p.Y186C (rs115232898). Toxicity rates in DPYD variant carriers vs. wild-type were compared using Fisher’s Exact tests. Results: 201 patients receiving topical fluoropyrimidine therapy who had available DPYD genotype data were included in the analysis. Most patients were self-reported white (97%), male (71%), and received topical fluoropyrimidine for a diagnosis of actinic keratosis (79%). As expected in a US patient cohort, 7.0% (14/201) of patients carried a DPYD variant. No patients experienced grade 3+ toxicity. Patients carrying a DPYD variant allele had nominally higher risk of grade 1+ toxicity (21.4% vs. 10.2%, odds ratio = 2.40 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.10-2.53), p = 0.19). Conclusions: Patients carrying DPYD variant alleles may have increased risk of non-severe toxicity from topical fluoropyrimidines, but the risk of severe toxicity is minimal regardless of genotype. DPYD genetic testing to prevent severe and fatal fluoropyrimidine toxicity should be reserved for patients receiving systemic treatment and need not include patients receiving topical treatment, in whom risk of severe toxicity is minimal.

A pilot study using immunohistochemical staining to characterize dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression in keratinocyte neoplasms

To the Editor: Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat actinic keratoses (AK), superficial basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCis). 5-FU is metabolized and inactivated by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which is highly active in the liver but can be expressed in tumors as well. In several visceral malignancies, tumor DPD expression predicts response to systemic 5-FU: tumors with lower DPD expression correlate with higher 5-FU reactivity and better clinical response.1Horiguchi J. Yoshida T. Koibuchi Y. et al.DPD activity and immunohistochemical DPD expression in human breast cancer.Oncol Rep. 2004; 11: 65-72PubMed Google Scholar, 2Oi K. Makino M. Ozaki M. et al.Immunohistochemical dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression is a good prognostic indicator for patients with Dukes' C colorectal cancer.Anticancer Res. 2004; 24: 273-279PubMed Google Scholar, 3Fukuda H. Takiguchi N. Koda K. Oda K. Seike K. Miyazaki M. Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase are related to histological effects of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary gastric cancer patients.Cancer Invest. 2006; 24: 235-241https://doi.org/10.1080/07357900600632082Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar Although this association has been studied in visceral tumors, the expression of DPD in keratinocyte neoplasms is not known. In this pilot study, we assessed DPD expression in benign, premalignant, and malignant keratinocyte neoplasms to assess the range and level of DPD activity. We performed DPD immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of 26 superficial and nodular basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 10 SCCis, 16 AKs, and 8 seborrheic keratoses from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens collected within the past 3 years. Diagnoses were confirmed by dermatopathologists (B.H., B.D.). DPD IHC was performed with anti-DPD antibody (Abcam #134922, 1:500 dilution). DPD expression was scored by intensity ranging from 0 to 3 by 2 authors (O.I. and B.D.), with hepatic staining as a positive control (Table I). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare DPD scores between classes of keratinocyte neoplasms (R software, version 4.0.3, https://www.r-project.org).Table IDihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase immunohistochemistry intensity score in patient samples (n = 60)DPD IHC intensity score0123Seborrheic keratosis0422Actinic keratosis1960SCC in situ0442Basal cell carcinoma21410Basal cell carcinoma includes both superficial and nodular subtypes. DPD IHC intensity was scored from 0 to 3 (0: no expression, 1: weak expression, 2: moderate expression, 3: strong expression). Fisher’s exact test P value = 3.95 × 10−9.DPD, Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; IHC, immunohistochemistry; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. Open table in a new tab Basal cell carcinoma includes both superficial and nodular subtypes. DPD IHC intensity was scored from 0 to 3 (0: no expression, 1: weak expression, 2: moderate expression, 3: strong expression). Fisher’s exact test P value = 3.95 × 10−9. DPD, Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; IHC, immunohistochemistry; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. The results showed a significantly enriched proportion of BCCs (81%, 21/26) displaying no DPD expression (DPD IHC intensity score of 0), compared to 0% (0/10) of SCCis and 6% (1/16) of AKs (P = 3.95 × 10−9, Table I). By contrast, 15% of BCC, 40% of SCCis, and 56% of AK had an intensity score of 1; 3% of BCC, 40% of SCCis, and 37.5% of AK had an intensity score of 2; and 0% of BCC, 20% of SCCis, and 0% of AK had an intensity score of 3 (Table I). The DPD intensity scores of seborrheic keratoses, a noncancerous keratinocyte neoplasm control, were distributed between 1 and 3. Our results suggest that DPD expression varies both within and across different keratinocyte neoplasms, and that a substantial fraction of BCC may have lower DPD expression compared to AK, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and seborrheic keratoses. Clinical studies have reported a wide range of efficacy in the use of topical 5-FU treatment for early-stage BCC and SCC, with success rates in SCC ranging from 27% to 93%.4Love W.E. Bernhard J.D. Bordeaux J. Topical imiquimod or fluorouracil therapy for basal and squamous cell carcinoma.Arch Dermatol. 2009; 145: 1431-1438Crossref PubMed Scopus (191) Google Scholar,5Neale H. Michelon M. Jacob S. et al.Topical 5% 5-fluorouracil versus procedural modalities for squamous cell carcinoma in situ and superficial basal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022; 87: 423-425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.045Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar While differences in treatment regimens and study design are likely to contribute to this variability, our results raise the possibility that differences in keratinocyte tumor DPD expression could also play a role in topical 5-FU treatment efficacy. The results of this pilot study support the value of a larger prospective study to investigate if DPD expression predicts clinical response of low-grade BCC and SCC to topical 5-FU. If true, then DPD IHC staining could be performed by pathology services to identify keratinocyte neoplasms that are more likely to respond favorably to topical 5-FU, reducing the uncertainty of treatment efficacy to this useful therapeutic option. None disclosed.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotype in peripheral blood mononuclear cells is related to adverse events of fluoropyrimidine-therapy.

The primary objective of this study was to determine if dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is related to adverse events during fluoropyrimidine therapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The study population included 481 patients who received fluoropyrimidine treatment and for whom relevant patient characteristics were known and adverse events were noted in the electronic health records. Factors besides DPD phenotype that could affect the incidence of adverse events were corrected for using log regression. These log regression models were used to identify an association between the DPD phenotype measured in PBMCs and adverse events. Patients with a decreased DPD activity measured in PBMCs suffered more adverse events. Results from log regression data show that this effect remains significant after correcting for dosage, chemotherapy regimen and relevant patient characteristics. A significant correlation was found between reduced DPD enzyme activity in PBMCs and adverse events. The findings in this paper support further exploring DPD phenotyping as a method for preventing fluoropyrimidine-related adverse events. Further assessment of DPD phenotyping will require clinical validation in a prospective study.

Impact of dose adjustment of fluoropyrimidines on toxicity in patients with DPD-deficient colorectal cancer: A single-center experience.

94 Background: Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are the chemotherapy backbone for most patients with CRC. FPs are metabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Current guidelines recommend measuring DPD activity before chemotherapy administration to adjust the initial dose and thus prevent high-grade toxicity. However, the clinical impact of this strategy is still understudied. We aim to study the efficacy and toxicity of FPs dose modifications according to DPD activity in patients with CRC. Methods: We retrospectively identified all the CRC cancer patients treated with FPs between January 2017 and July 2021 and with DPD activity assessment at Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. Clinical characteristics and tolerability were collected. Two cohorts were stablished according to its DPD activity, patients with a normal DPD metabolism (DPD wild-type patients) and patients with a diminished metabolism of FPs (DPD deficient patients). Results: A total of 249 CRC patients were included in this study. Sixteen patients (6,4%) were DPD deficient, and 15 of them (94%) received initially 50% of the recommended standard dosing of FPs (increasing to 75% in following cycles if well tolerated) according to guidelines. Forty percent of non-DPD deficiency started FPs at 75% of the standard initial dose due to frailty. Two toxic deaths were observed in the DPD-wild-type cohort, none in the DPD deficient cohort. Clinico-pathological characteristics of patients and their toxicity according to each cohort are depicted in the table. No significant differences in G3/4 toxicity between both groups (40% and 37% in the DPD-wild-type and DPD-deficient cohort, respectively). Diarrhea G3/4 was numerically more present in the DPD-deficient group (25% vs 12%, respectively). Conclusions: Overall, DPD genotype-guided FP treatment in DPD deficient patients with CRC may prevent high-grade toxicity. Diarrhea might still be higher in this group despite dose modifications, so careful surveillance and early treatment should be considered in these patients. [Table: see text]

Implementation and clinical benefit of DPYD genotyping in a Danish cancer population

In 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended testing patients for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency before systemic treatment with fluoropyrimidines (FP). DPD activity testing identifies patients at elevated risk of severe FP-related toxicity (FP-TOX). The two most used methods for DPD testing are DPYD genotyping and DPD phenotyping (plasma uracil concentration). The primary objective of this study was to compare the overall frequency of overall grade ≥3 FP-TOX before and after the implementation of DPYD genotyping. Two hundred thirty Danish, primarily gastrointestinal cancer patients, were DPYD-genotyped before their first dose of FP, and blood was sampled for post hoc assessment of P-uracil. The initial dose was reduced for variant carriers. Grade ≥3 FP-TOX was registered after the first three treatment cycles of FP. The frequency of toxicity was compared to a historical cohort of 492 patients with post hoc determined DPYD genotype from a biobank. The frequency of overall grade ≥3 FP-TOX was 27% in the DPYD genotype-guided group compared to 24% in the historical cohort. In DPYD variant carriers, DPYD genotyping reduced the frequency of FP-related hospitalization from 19% to 0%. In the control group, 4.8% of DPYD variant carriers died due to FP-TOX compared to 0% in the group receiving DPYD genotype-guided dosing of FP. In the intervention group, wild-type patients with uracil ≥16 ng/ml had a higher frequency of FP-TOX than wild-type patients with uracil <16 ng/ml (55% versus 28%). We found no population-level benefit of DPYD genotyping when comparing the risk of grade ≥3 FP-TOX before and after clinical implementation. We observed no deaths or FP-related hospitalizations in patients whose FP treatment was guided by a variant DPYD genotype. The use of DPD phenotyping may add valuable information in DPYD wild-type patients.

Quantitative impact of pre-analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre-analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (UH2 ) concentrations, as they are essential in reliable DPD-deficiency testing. U and UH2 concentrations were collected from 14 hospital laboratories. Stability in whole blood and plasma after centrifugation, the type of anticoagulant and long-term plasma storage were evaluated. The variation induced by time and temperature was calculated and compared to an acceptability range of ±20%. Inter-occasion variability (IOV) of U and UH2 was assessed in 573 patients double sampled for DPD-deficiency testing. Storage of blood samples before centrifugation at room temperature (RT) should not exceed 1h, whereas cold (+4°C) storage maintains the stability of uracil after 5hours. For patients correctly double sampled, IOV of U reached 22.4% for U (SD = 17.9%, range = 0-99%). Notably, 17% of them were assigned with a different phenotype (normal or DPD-deficient) based on the analysis of their two samples. For those having at least one non-compliant sample, this percentage increased up to 33.8%. The moment of blood collection did not affect the DPD phenotyping result. Caution should be taken when interpreting U concentrations if the time before centrifugation exceeds 1hour at RT, since it rises significantly afterwards. Not respecting the pre-analytical conditions for DPD phenotyping increases the risk of DPD status misclassification.

DPYD genotyping and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotyping in clinical oncology. A clinically focused minireview.

In clinical oncology, systemic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its oral pro-drugs are used to treat a broad group of solid tumours. Patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme deficiency are at elevated risk of toxicity if treated with standard doses of 5-FU. DPYD genotyping and measurements of plasma uracil concentration (DPD phenotyping) can be applied as tests for DPD deficiency. In April 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended pre-treatment DPD testing to reduce the risk of 5-FU-related toxicity. The objective of this study is to present the current evidence for DPD testing in routine oncological practice. Two systematic literature searches were performed following the PRISMA guidelines. We identified studies examining the possible benefit of DPYD genotyping or DPD phenotyping on the toxicity risk. Nine and 12 studies met the criteria for using DPYD genotyping and DPD phenotyping, respectively. The evidence supporting either DPYD genotyping or DPD phenotyping as pre-treatment tests to reduce 5-FU toxicity is poor. Further evidence is still needed to fully understand and guide clinicians to dose by DPD activity.

Quantification of uracil, dihydrouracil, thymine and dihydrothymine for reliable dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotyping critically depend on blood and plasma storage conditions

Establishing dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity is highly important in determining the correct starting dose of fluoropyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine. The concentration ratio of endogenous uracil with its metabolite dihydrouracil (DHU) is a well-known parameter that is linked to DPD activity. Concentration ratios such as thymine over its DPD-converted metabolite dihydrothymine (DHT) is less described and may serve as an alternative diagnostic biomarker for DPD activity.In this study, we describe the development and validation of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay for the quantification of uracil, DHU, thymine, and DHT in human plasma. In addition, stability experiments were performed.Uracil and thymine were quantified up to 80.0 ng/mL and DHU and DHT up to 800 ng/mL. Intra- and inter-assay precision were maximum 8.0 % and 7.6 %. respectively. Also, recovery was adequate and significant matrix-effects and carry-over were excluded. Stability experiments showed that uracil concentrations increased with 27–52 % when stored for 1 or 2 h at ambient temperatures compared to cold storage. Thymine, DHU, and DHT concentrations remained stable, thymine after 1 h in plasma excluded, showing the DHT:T ratio might be a more robust marker for DPD activity than DHU:U.In conclusion, we present here a novel assay capable of quantifying uracil, thymine, DHU and DHT in a single analytical run. We provide additional data showing increased stability for DHU, thymine and DHT compared to uracil. This assay may be used as a diagnostic test in future studies, establishing the association of these endogenous biomarker concentrations with DPD activity and safety to treatment with fluoropyrimidines. In addition, future research should also be focused on reducing pre-analytical instability. Standardization in this field is essential to set proper reference values and to allow inter-study comparison on clinical outcomes.

Importance of Rare DPYD Genetic Polymorphisms for 5-Fluorouracil Therapy in the Japanese Population.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene, is the rate-limiting enzyme in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) degradation. In Caucasians, four DPYD risk variants are recognized to be responsible for interindividual variations in the development of 5-FU toxicity. However, these risk variants have not been identified in Asian populations. Recently, 41 DPYD allelic variants, including 15 novel single nucleotide variants, were identified in 3,554 Japanese individuals by analyzing their whole-genome sequences; however, the effects of these variants on DPD enzymatic activity remain unknown. In the present study, an in vitro analysis was performed on 41 DPD allelic variants and three DPD risk variants to elucidate the changes in enzymatic activity. Wild-type and 44 DPD-variant proteins were heterologously expressed in 293FT cells. DPD expression levels and dimerization of DPD were determined by immunoblotting after SDS-PAGE and blue native PAGE, respectively. The enzymatic activity of DPD was evaluated by quantification of dihydro-5-FU, a metabolite of 5-FU, using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Moreover, we used 3D simulation modeling to analyze the effect of amino acid substitutions on the conformation of DPD. Among the 41 DPD variants, seven exhibited drastically decreased intrinsic clearance (CL int ) compared to the wild-type protein. Moreover, R353C and G926V exhibited no enzymatic activity, and the band patterns observed in the immunoblots after blue native PAGE indicated that DPD dimerization is required for its enzymatic activity. Our data suggest that these variants may contribute to the significant inter-individual variability observed in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 5-FU. In our study, nine DPD variants exhibited drastically decreased or no enzymatic activity due to dimerization inhibition or conformational changes in each domain. Especially, the rare DPYD variants, although at very low frequencies, may serve as important pharmacogenomic markers associated with the severe 5-FU toxicity in Japanese population.

Evaluation of the Tasso-SST® capillary blood microsampling device for the measurement of endogenous uracil levels

BackgroundUracil (U) plasma or serum levels can be used as surrogates of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity, which is strongly related to the occurrence of severe or fatal toxicity after administration of fluoropyrimidines (FP) chemotherapy. Obtaining blood plasma or serum for U measurement usually requires a phlebotomy procedure by a qualified professional. An alternative to conventional blood drawn is the use of the Tasso-SST® device, which allows the collection of a small blood volume from skin capillaries. This study aimed to implement a sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the determination of U in small serum samples and to compare U concentrations measured in venous plasma, obtained after phlebotomy, and serum obtained with the Tasso-SST® device. MethodsFifty microliter samples were prepared through simple protein precipitation with trichloroacetic acid. Chromatographic separation was performed with a porous graphitic carbon stationary phase and mass spectrometric detection used positive electrospray ionization. The assay was validated according to international guidelines. ResultsThe linear range of the assay was 5–250 ng/mL. Measurement accuracy was in the range of 98.8–108.2%, inter-assay precision was 4.3–7.3%, and intra-assay precision was 3.4–6.1%. The average matrix effect was −6.42%. The extraction yield was 95–103.3%. U concentrations measured in serum obtained with the Tasso-SST® device and venous blood plasma were highly correlated (rs = 0.910, P < 0.0001), and no systematic or proportional bias between U levels measured in both matrices was found. ConclusionsThe use of blood microsampling with the Tasso-SST® device is a useful alternative for the measurement of U and the identification of patients with DPD deficiency.

Detection of the presence of polymorphisms in the DPYD gene in patients with colorectal and non-colorectal digestive tumors.

e15530 Background: Recently the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Spanish Medicines Agency (AEMPS) recommend performing a phenotypic and/or genotypic test before starting treatment with fluoropyrimidines The objective of this work has been to analyze the detection of polymorphisms in the DPYD gene in order to predict toxicity to fluoropyrimidines in our study population. Methods: Prospective study of 6 months duration in which patients diagnosed with CRC and non-CRC digestive tumors with an age range of 18-99 years have been included. The technique is performed on a sample of DNA extracted from lymphocytes in peripheral blood in an EDTA tube, performing a specific fluorescent allele amplification study (AMRS), which detects point mutations, insertions or deletions of DNA. Results: During the study period, 260 patients have been included, of whom 16 mutations have been detected, all in heterozygosity. Conclusions: Various variants of DPYD have been reported to cause the absence or reduction of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPP) activity. Through this technique we avoid the risk of serious toxicity with the administration of these drugs.[Table: see text]