Diffusion Of Effective Interventions Research Articles

Diffusion of Effective HIV Prevention Interventions–Lessons from Maryland and Massachusetts

This article describes, compares, and contrasts the contexts, processes, and results of the experiences of Maryland and Massachusetts in diffusing evidence-based interventions. The evolution of first Maryland's, then Massachusetts's, diffusion of effective interventions is described. Both states have extensive experience planning, developing and evaluating individual-, group-, and community-level interventions promoted in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions (DEBI) initiative, as well as overcoming many barriers to translate research to practice. This article describes the processes whereby effective interventions were diffused from the planning to evaluation stages. This includes the role of community-planning groups and other local stakeholders in planning, procurement methods, and capacity building approaches. Specific milestones in increasing the evidence basis of program implementation, management, and evaluation are presented. For jurisdictions considering implementing DEBI, the article illustrates core programmatic and infrastructure capacities at the state and vendor level important to success in Maryland and Massachusetts. It also describes how each state's approach to the management and evaluation of prevention programs contributed to the effective diffusion of the behavioral interventions. Finally, this article provides recommendations about remaining gaps in evidence-based interventions to meet "real-world prevention needs" and ways to improve prevention targeting and effectiveness. This article recommends strategies to improve the dissemination of DEBI and other evidence-based interventions nationally.

Preventing chronic disease and improving health: broadening the scope of behavioral medicine research and practice.

There has been much progress made over the past 50 years in developing and applying the behavioral medicine evidence base to improve the health of individuals and populations. In particular, there has been progress made in applying behavioral and social science research and theories to the challenge of promoting health and disease prevention. These gains notwithstanding, not all sections of the population have benefited equally, either within or between countries. The disparities in social, mental, and physical health between the most advantaged and the most disadvantaged population groups are in the main, as great as, if not greater, than ever. This represents a tremendous challenge to all of us as behavioral medicine practitioners, teachers, and researchers. Although understanding more about the so-called upstream determinants of health that generate such health disparities is clearly very important, this knowledge will only make a difference if it is used to generate appropriate multilevel intervention strategies over a long and sustained period of time. However, such outcomes will also be affected by diverse aspects of the global natural ecological environment, and by striving for what has been described as a health-sustaining environment. With the increasing impact of globalization on most aspects of our lives, including health, it is important to consider the implications of this for preventing disease and promoting health across traditional national borders. This should challenge us to think about the importance of appropriate dissemination and diffusion of effective interventions at an institutional or policy level not only within a single country, but also between countries. Given the rapid economic and social changes occurring globally, and the tremendous impact of global environmental change on health, there is a need to broaden the scope and practice of behavioral medicine.