TECHNOLOGY AND THE WAY WE THINK Mia Krxtzk ”Are [modern tools] helping our brains develop or can there be negative consequences from our exposure to technology?” The development of technology has been linked to an increase in human cognitive abilities. In ”Pa— leolithic Technology and Human Evolution,” Stanley H. Ambrose traces the human biological and cultural evolution due to technology. Starting around 2.5 mil- lion years ago, early humans began to see an increase in brain size, population size, and geographic range. At that time stone tool technology was being devel- oped. By creating better tools, humans had greater ac- cess to food sources that were able to support the high metabolic demands of a larger brain size. Amborse also suggests that language and composite—tool mak- ing coevolved about 300,000 years ago. Both speech and composite tool—making involve nonrepetitive mo- tor control, and they are both controlled by adjacent areas of the interior frontal lobe (Ambrose 2001). Not only that, but the assembly of the tools from smaller units is similar to the assembly of words from sounds and sentences or phrases from words. Ambrose also points out that composite tool manufacture contrib- uted to the evolution of the frontal lobe, which is in- volved in planning. In Making Silent Stones Speak, Kathy Schick and Nicholas Patrick Toth provide more reasons for the cognitive developments that followed the use of tools. By creating tools, humans had to con- ceptualize possible uses for them as well as the time and the place to use them. They also had to think about the resources needed to make the tools and fi- nally how to make tools with other tools. Given the theories on early human tool use, it is easy to wonder how the use of modern ”tools” is in- fluencing us. Are they helping our brains develop or can there be negative consequences from our exposure to technology? Business, culture, and technology writer Nicholas Carr points out the negative aspects of the internet. In an article for the Atlantic Monthly, ”Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr expresses his concern for the frag- mented attention and lack of concentration he thinks resulted from regular internet use. He provides anec- dotal evidence of people's concentrations dwindling with the expansion of the internet. In addition to that, he cites a study done by scientists at the University Col- lege London on online research habits. They looked at the logs of two popular research sites and found that people tend to skim articles instead of reading them in depth. Also, when visitors saved a long article, there is no evidence that they went back to read it. It seems that with the vast amount and instant availability of information, skimming has replaced concentrated reading. As for the question of whether reading more articles makes up for the fact that they are not read in depth individually, Carr argues (with the help of cog- nitive neuroscientist, Maryanne Wolf) that our ability to make rich mental connections stems from concen- trated reading. Despite the fact that there are certain drawbacks to modern technology, perhaps we are learning to think in ways that are just as rewarding. Though the internet may not be a good medium for the rich men- tal connections of deep reading, maybe we will learn to make different types of connections through our exposure to a broad range of information. We might be able to see general patterns in information or con- nect two seemingly disparate topics. It is hard to find evidence for such occurrences; however, there is evi- dence that surfing the internet activates parts of the brain that are different from those activated by more traditional mediums. Recent findings suggest that internet surfing could be good for middle—aged and older people. Researchers at the University of Califor- nia Los Angeles found that search- ing the web activated areas in the brain associated with controlled d e c i s i o n BERKELEY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL - TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN INTERACTION - FALL 2009 - VOLUME 13 ° IssUE 1 - 39