Different Types Of Beta-blockers Research Articles

Aesthetic Outcome of Propranolol vs Atenolol Treatment of Children with Infantile Haemangioma.

Infantile haemangiomas are common benign tumours of infancy, which can be treated effectively with beta-blockers such as propranolol and atenolol. Different types of beta-blockers may result in different long-term aesthetic outcomes. This study evaluated the difference in long-term aesthetic outcomes between infantile haemangiomas treated with either propranolol or atenolol, including the perspective of physicians, parents, and children. Children, aged ≥6 years, treated with propranolol or atenolol for infantile haemangioma during infancy, participated in this 2-centre cross-sectional study. The primary endpoint was change in appearance of the infantile haemangioma from pre-treatment to follow-up, using a physician-rated visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (physician- and parent-rated) and a VAS (child-rated), assessing the residual lesion. In total, 103 children (35 treated with propranolol, 68 with atenolol) were analysed. No differences were found between children treated with propranolol and children treated with atenolol on physician-rated VAS (p = 0.10) or any secondary outcomes. Physicians indicated a large aesthetic improve-ment from pre- treatment to follow-up. Physicians, parents and children were positive about the current state of the residual lesion. Minor sequelae were common (86%). These results, in combination with the favourable safety profile of atenolol, should be considered when choosing beta-blocker treatment for infantile haemangioma.

Beta blockers and long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting: a nationwide observational study.

AimsBeta blockers are associated with improved outcomes for selected patients with cardiovascular disease. We assessed long-term utilization of beta blockers after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its association with outcome.Methods and resultsAll 35 184 patients in Sweden who underwent first-time isolated CABG between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2017 and were followed for at least 6 months were included in a nationwide observational study. Multivariable Cox regression models using time-updated data on dispensed prescriptions were used to assess associations between different types of beta blockers and outcomes. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with and without previous MI, heart failure, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range 0–11). At baseline, 33 159 (94.2%) patients were dispensed beta blockers, 30 563 (92.2%) of which were cardioselective beta blockers. After 10 years, the dispensing of cardioselective beta blockers had declined to 73.7% of all patients. Ongoing treatment with cardioselective beta blockers was associated with a slight reduction in MACEs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.98, P = 0.0063]. The reduction was largely driven by a reduced risk of MI (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.92, P = 0.0003), while there was no significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93–1.05) and stroke (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87–1.05). The reduced risk for MI was consistent in all the investigated subgroups.ConclusionOngoing treatment with cardioselective beta blockers after CABG is associated with a reduction in MACEs, mainly because of reduced long-term risk for MI. The association between cardioselective beta blockers and MI was consistent in patients with and patients without previous MI, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or reduced LVEF.

Atenolol is not effective in reducing ventricular arrhythmia severity on exercise stress test in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Abstract Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias during exercise and emotions which may lead to sudden cardiac death. Beta-blockers (BB) are the mainstay of therapy in patients with CPVT, but studies comparing the efficacy of different types of BB are scarce. Our objective was to determine the efficacy of different types of BB in reducing the ventricular arrhythmia (VA) severity on exercise stress test (EST) in patients with CPVT. Data was derived from the International CPVT Registry, a large retrospective cohort study. We included patients who had an EST before (pre-EST) and after start of BB (post-EST). We divided the cohort into five groups based on the first prescribed BB and compared pre-EST and post-EST. We included 428 patients (median age 18.5 [11.7–39.6] years, 240 (56.%) female), 155 (36.2%) probands) of whom 38 (8.9%) used atenolol, 131 (30.6%) bisoprolol, 82 (19.2%) metoprolol, 124 (29.0%) nadolol and 53 (12.4%) propranolol. Sex and history of aborted cardiac arrest were similar in all groups. The age at start of BB differed (p<0,001): patients using bisoprolol were oldest (35.0 [15.7–35.3]) while patients using propranolol were youngest (12.3 [8.8–24.9]). Median daily BB dose in mg/kg was: 1.0 [0.8–2.3] for atenolol, 0.06 [0.05–0.10] for bisoprolol, 0.9 [0.6–1.5] for metoprolol, 1.1 [0.9–1.6] for nadolol and 1.5 [1.1–2.8] for propranolol. Resting heart rate on pre-EST and post-EST was similar in all groups. Patients using metoprolol had a significantly higher maximum heart rate post-EST compared to nadolol and propranolol (161±18 vs 136±19 and 130±22 bpm, p=0,002 and p=0,001, respectively). The VA severity decreased significantly after BB (147 (37.9%) (non-sustained) ventricular tachycardia ((NS)VT) and 120 (30.9%) no or isolated ventricular premature beat (iVPB) pre-EST vs 46 (11.4%) (NS)VT and 184 (45.7%) iVPB post-EST, p<0,001). Examining the different groups, the VA severity decreased significantly after BB in all but atenolol (13 (40.6%) (NS)VT and 8 (25.0%) iVPB pre-EST vs 9 (25.0%) (NS)VT and 15 (41.7%) iVPB post-EST, p=0,103). Based on these results we conclude that all beta-blockers except atenolol are effective in reducing the VA severity on EST in patients with CPVT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): E-Rare Joint Transnational Call for Proposals 2015 “Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: Integrating Clinical and Basic Science”

Beta Blocker Therapy in Heart Failure Patients with Active Cocaine Use: A Systematic Review.

Background Cocaine use is associated with multiple cardiovascular complications including heart failure. The use of different types of beta blockers in heart failure patients with active cocaine use is still a matter of debate. In this review, our objective is to systematically review the available literature regarding the use of beta blockers in the treatment of heart failure patients with concurrent cocaine use. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception to March 2019 using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms “cocaine”, “heart failure”, “beta blocker,” and “cardiomyopathy”. Only studies containing the outcomes of heart failure patients with active cocaine use who were treated with beta blockers were included. Results The search resulted in 2072 articles out of which 12 were finally included in the review. A total number of participants were 1994 with a median sample size of 111. Most of the studies were retrospective in nature with Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence from 3 to 5. The main primary outcomes included readmission rates, mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In the studies analyzed, beta blockers were found to have either a beneficial or a neutral effect on primary outcomes in heart failure patients with active cocaine use. Conclusion The use of beta blocker therapy appears to be safe and beneficial in heart failure patients with active cocaine use, although the evidence is not robust. Furthermore, large-scale studies are required to confirm this finding.

Effects of Aerobic Exercises on Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Introduction: Prescribing the Adrenergic beta-Antagonists is very common in treating cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of aerobic training in patients with coronary artery disease, prescribed two different types of beta-blockers (selective and non- selective) on the patient's lipid profile (Lipoproteins) and FBS (Blood Glucose). Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with coronary artery disease, aged 45-65 years, were compared in two groups of selective (n=36) and non-selective (n=24) users of beta-blockers. The training program consisted of 8 weeks of aerobic exercise on the treadmill (3 sessions per week, about 50 minutes per session, with an intensity of 40% to 60% of the heart rate reserve). Each study patient’s lipid profile and FBS level were obtained before the onset of the study and after the end of the intervention. The collected data were analyzed using repeated-measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results: In the selective group, lipid profile and FBS did not significantly change. In the non-selective group, FBS and triglyceride levels were significantly reduced after the intervention; however, HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol levels were not significantly changed (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that aerobic training in patients with CAD who used non-selective beta-blockers has more positive effects.

PLASMA BETA BLOCKER LEVEL MEASUREMENT - THE DIFFERENCE IN TREATMENT ADHERENCE ACCORDING TO TYPE OF BETA BLOCKER

Objective: Beta-blocker treatment is commonly used in patients with arterial hypertension. Patients treated with more selective beta-blocker are believed to experience less frequently adverse effects of the drug. Suboptimal medication adherence is common in patients treated with beta-blocker, but there is little evidence about comparing the adherence between different beta blockers. The aim of our study was to evaluate non adherence rate among the patients taking beta-blockers for the treatment of arterial hypertension and to compare the adherence to different types of beta-blockers.Design and method: We analyzed 421 serum beta blocker levels in 261 patients. Minimal time interval between the two measurements was three months. We analyzed “first measurement” within the single patient (n = 261) and also repeated measurements in patients with more than one plasma level sample (“all measurements”, n = 421). Non-adherence to betaxolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol and nebivolol was analyzed separately and compared. Results: Non-ahrerence to beta-blocker based on the results of the “first measurement within the patient” was 25,30 % and based on the results of the “all measurement” was 23,3%. 46,3% patients varied in non-adherence status among 70 patients with two or more measurement available, 53,7% of patients were adherent or non-adherent in all measurements. The highest rate of non-adherence was in patients prescribed with nebivolol (30,9%), the lowest in patients prescribed with betaxolol (15,9%), p < 0,269. Non-adherence to treatment was most common in nebivolol also in “all measurements” (33,7%) and lowest in betaxolol (8,9%), p < 0,001. Association between adherence to the treatment and number of used antihypertensive drugs was not statistically significant (p = 0,416). Conclusions: Non-adherence to beta-blocker treatment in patients with arterial hypertension was lower than expected and is not equal in different types of beta-blockers. Adherence does not correlate with beta-1 selectivity of the beta-blocker. The variability of adherence is high among patients with repeated testing.

Beta blockers for peripheral arterial disease

Beta (β) blockers are indicated for use in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, optimal therapy for people with CAD accompanied by intermittent claudication has been controversial because of the presumed peripheral haemodynamic consequences of beta blockers, leading to worsening symptoms of intermittent claudication. This is an update of a review first published in 2008. To quantify the potential harmful effects of beta blockers on maximum walking distance, claudication distance, calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature when used in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). For this update, the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched March 2013) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2013, Issue 2). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of both selective (β1) and non-selective (β1 and β2) beta blockers compared with placebo. We excluded trials that compared different types of beta blockers. Primary outcome measures were claudication distance in metres, time to claudication in minutes and maximum walking distance in metres and minutes (as assessed by treadmill).Secondary outcome measures included calf blood flow (mL/100 mL/min), calf vascular resistance and skin temperature (ºC). We included six RCTs that fulfilled the above criteria, with a total of 119 participants. The beta blockers studied were atenolol, propranolol, pindolol and metoprolol. All trials were of poor quality with the drugs administered over a short time (10 days to two months). None of the primary outcomes were reported by more than one study. Similarly, secondary outcome measures, with the exception of vascular resistance (as reported by three studies), were reported, each by only one study. Pooling of such results was deemed inappropriate. None of the trials showed a statistically significant worsening effect of beta blockers on time to claudication, claudication distance and maximal walking distance as measured on a treadmill, nor on calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature, when compared with placebo. No reports described adverse events associated with the beta blockers studied. Currently, no evidence suggests that beta blockers adversely affect walking distance, calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature in people with intermittent claudication. However, because of the lack of large published trials, beta blockers should be used with caution, if clinically indicated.

Impact of Carvedilol and Metoprolol on Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy: The MADIT-CRT Trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on the endpoint of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study. The impact of carvedilol and metoprolol on inappropriate therapy in heart failure patients with devices has not yet been investigated. All patients in the MADIT-CRT study who received a device (N = 1,790) were identified. Using time-dependent Cox regression analysis, we compared patients treated with different types of beta-blockers or no beta-blockers on the primary endpoint of inappropriate therapy, delivered as antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock therapy. Secondary endpoints were inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation and atrial tachyarrhythmias, also evaluated as ATP or shock therapy. Inappropriate therapy occurred in 253 (14%) of 1,790 patients during a follow-up period of 3.4 ± 1.1 years. Treatment with carvedilol was associated with a significantly decreased risk of inappropriate therapy compared with metoprolol (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48 to 0.85]; p = 0.002). The reduction in risk was consistent for inappropriate ATP (HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.48 to 0.90]; p = 0.009) and inappropriate shock therapy (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.36 to 0.80]; p = 0.002). The risk of inappropriate therapy caused by atrial fibrillation was also reduced in patients receiving carvedilol compared with metoprolol (HR: 0.50 [95% CI: 0.32 to 0.81]; p = 0.004). General use of beta-blockers (93%) and adherence in this study was high. In heart failure patients undergoing either cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator or with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device, carvedilol was associated with a 36% lower rate of inappropriate ATP and shock therapy compared with metoprolol. Inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation was associated with a 50% lower rate in patients receiving carvedilol compared with those receiving metoprolol. (MADIT-CRT: Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; NCT00180271).

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT BETA-BLOCKERS ON INAPPROPRIATE THERAPY IN THE MADIT-CRT TRIAL

The effect of different beta-blockers on inappropriate therapy in heart failure patients with devices has not been investigated previously. All patients in the MADIT-CRT study who received a device (N=1790) were identified and treatment or no treatment with different types of beta-blockers were

Therapeutic effect of β-adrenoceptor blockers using a mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy with a troponin mutation

Extensive clinical studies have demonstrated that beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents (beta-blockers) are beneficial in the treatment of chronic heart failure, which is due to various aetiologies, including idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischaemic heart disease. However, little is known about the therapeutic efficacy of beta-blockers in the treatment of the inherited form of DCM, of which causative mutations have recently been identified in various genes, including those encoding cardiac sarcomeric proteins. Using a mouse model of inherited DCM with a troponin mutation, we aim to study the treatment benefits of beta-blockers. Three different types of beta-blockers, carvedilol, metoprolol, and atenolol, were orally administered to a knock-in mouse model of inherited DCM with a deletion mutation DeltaK210 in the cardiac troponin T gene (TNNT2). Therapeutic effects were examined on the basis of survival and myocardial remodelling. The lipophilic beta(1)-selective beta-blocker metoprolol was found to prevent cardiac dysfunction and remodelling and extend the survival of knock-in mice. Conversely, both the non-selective beta-blocker carvedilol and the hydrophilic beta(1)-selective beta-blocker atenolol had no beneficial effects on survival and myocardial remodelling in this mouse model of inherited DCM. The highly lipophilic beta(1)-selective beta-blocker metoprolol, known to prevent ventricular fibrillation via central nervous system-mediated vagal activation, may be especially beneficial to DCM patients showing a family history of frequent sudden cardiac death, such as those with a deletion mutation DeltaK210 in the TNNT2 gene.

Beta Blockers for Peripheral Arterial Disease

To quantify the potential harm of beta blockers in patients with peripheral arterial disease. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing beta blockers with placebo for the outcomes of claudication and maximal walking distance and time, calf blood flow, vascular resistance and skin temperature were searched using the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, PubMed and CINAHL. Trials comparing different types of beta blockers were excluded. Six RCTs fulfilling the above criteria, with a total of 119 patients, were included. The beta blockers studied were atenolol, propranolol, pindolol and metoprolol. None of the trials showed a statistically significant worsening effect of beta blockers on the outcomes measured. There were no reports of any adverse events with the beta blockers studied. Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that beta blockers adversely affect walking distance in people with intermittent claudication. Beta blockers should be used with caution if clinically indicated, especially in patients with critical ischaemia where acute lowering of blood pressure is contraindicated.

Betablocker in der Therapie der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz

Once contraindicated, beta-blockers have become an established, evidence-based, recommended treatment concept in chronic heart failure during the last years. The increased activation of the adrenergic system in heart failure syndrome, which leads to transmission of several adverse biological signals to myocytes through adrenergic receptors, provides the rationale for the use of beta-blockers in patients with chronic heart failure. Long-term treatment with different types of beta-blockers addictive to an ACE-inhibitor and diuretics results in normalization of left ventricular shape, an improvement of left ventricular function, and a reduction of hospitalization rate for heart failure. Hemodynamic and clinical improvement is independent of etiology and severity of left ventricular dysfunction. THERAPEUTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ACCORDINGS TO STUDIES: Adequately powered clinical trials (CIBIS II, MERIT-HF, COPERNICUS) testing different types of beta-blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol, carvedilol) clearly demonstrated that total mortality and the incidence of sudden cardiac death were significantly reduced in heart failure patients by each of these agents. On the basis of all available evidence, all patients with chronic, stable heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) and with impaired left ventricular function (LVEF < 45%) should receive one of the three above mentioned beta-blockers. Protective effects of beta-blockers in heart failure comprise decrease in heart rate, a decrease of energy consumption, antifibrillatory effects, protection against adrenergic overactivation, and hence, inhibition of myocardial cell necrosis. Moreover, several beta-blockers induce an up-regulation of beta-receptors leading to an improvement of contractility during long-term treatment. It should be mentioned that even a low dosage of beta-blockers exert negative inotropic effects and may lead to a deterioration of hemodynamics and heart failure symptoms in patients with heart failure. The patients treated should be informed that the success of the "paradoxical intervention" will be obvious until 2-3 months after initiation of additional beta-blocker therapy. Beta-blocker treatment for heart failure should be started in stable patients with a very low initial dosage and then up-titrated to the maximal tolerated dosage and should be continued indefinitely. Mortality reduction by beta-blockade in heart failure is no class effect. So far, beneficial effects could only be demonstrated for lipophilic agents. Whether the non-selective beta-blocker carvedilol with additional properties has advantages over the beta-1-selective metoprolol is currently investigated in the COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial) study. Despite the impressive effects in terms of morbidity and mortality reduction, the transfer of these benefits to the clinical practice setting is difficult, with international data showing only 10% of patients with heart failure being treated.

Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of drugs with different actions on adrenergic receptors: A comparison between alpha blockers and different types of beta blockers with and without vasodilating effect

The regulation of vascular resistance, cardiac output, and thus blood pressure can be influenced by antihypertensive drugs acting at central and peripheral adrenergic receptors. The results presented here are from acute or chronic studies in 205 patients with mild or moderately severe essential hypertension: beta blockers (N = 101); alpha blockers (N = 36); a separate alpha- + beta-blocker combination or the combination agent labetalol (N = 37); prizidilol, a beta-blocker/vasodilator (N = 14); and dilevalol, a beta blocker/beta 2-stimulator (N = 17). Beta blockers without strong intrinsic sympathomimetic activity reduce heart rate and cardiac output immediately, but due to a reflex increase in total peripheral resistance index, blood pressure is unchanged or only slightly reduced. During chronic use, total peripheral resistance drops towards pretreatment level and pressure falls. Beta blockers with strong intrinsic sympathomimetic activity do not reduce heart rate or cardiac output at rest when sympathetic tone is low. During exercise, heart rate and cardiac output are reduced, but less than with conventional beta blockers, and resistance is unchanged or slightly reduced. An acute and chronic reduction in blood pressure can be produced by alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers (prazosin, doxazosin, trimazosin), and in these cases the fall occurs via a reduction in total peripheral resistance index without reflex tachycardia. These drugs tend to increase exercise stroke volume and cardiac output during chronic treatment. Free combinations of beta and alpha blockers or the use of the fixed combination drug, labetalol, induce marked reductions in blood pressure at rest and during exercise, mainly through a reduction in total peripheral resistance index. During chronic treatment, exercise stroke volume and cardiac output are well maintained. In acute studies with dilevalol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were reduced (p less than 0.001) within 1 hour in 17 males with essential hypertension (WHO stage I) who received 200-400 mg oral dilevalol. The reduction in MAP was around 16-17% and was associated with an immediate fall in the total peripheral resistance index of the same magnitude (14%, p less than 0.001) after 1 hour at rest. There were no significant changes in heart rate or cardiac index.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of Beta Blockers on Cardiac Function and Myocardial Oxygen Consumption in the Isolated Supported Heart Preparation of the Dog

Effects of 2 different types of beta blockers, CS-359 and practolol, on mechanical performance and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) in the isovolumic contraction of the isolated, blood-perfused canine heart with a support dog were studied. Two dose levels of the beta blockers were given intravenously to the support dog, one of which was enough to produce a significant beta adrenergic blocking action and other of which was a higher dose to reveal a direct depressant action on the isolated heart. CS-359 in the lower dose produced significant decreases in heart rate (HR), peak ventricular systolic pressure (peak VSP), and peak dp/dt while practolol caused no change in these parameters. The HR of the support dog was significantly decreased to the same degree in the lower dose of respective blocker. In the higher dose CS-359 decreased all parameters more definitely whereas practolol diminished peak VSP and peak dp/dt but did not significantly HR. MVO2 was decreased dose-relatedly by CS-359, but not affected significantly by practolol. From the analysis of relationships of MVO2 to peak VSP and HR in the isolated heart it is concluded that the effective reduction in MVO2 by CS-359 resulted mainly from a reduction in the peak VSP in the lower dose and additional decrease in HR in the higher dose of CS-359.