Different Doses Of Fentanyl Research Articles

Comparison of the ED50 of Ciprofol Combined With or Without Fentanyl for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Children: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Dose-Response Trial.

This study aimed to estimate the effect of different doses of fentanyl on the median effective dose (ED50) of ciprofol for attenuating the airway and motor response to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion response in healthy children. 90healthy preschool patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups: C0 (ciprofol+saline), C1 (ciprofol + fentanyl 1µg/kg), C2 (ciprofol + fentanyl 2µg/kg). Anesthesia was induced with either prepared fentanyl or saline, followed by ciprofol. The dose of ciprofol for each patient was determined using the up-and-down sequential study design. The primary outcome was the ED50 of ciprofol required for smooth LMA insertion in the three groups. Additionally, the time to loss of consciousness and any perioperative adverse events were recorded. Compared with the C0 group, the ED50 (95% confidence interval) of ciprofol in the C1 and C2 groups were significantly lower (1.81 [1.73-1.90]mg/kg versus 0.67 [0.64-0.71]mg/kg and 0.48 [0.42-0.54] mg/kg, respectively; P<0.05). Additionally, the ED50 of ciprofol in the C2 group was lower than that in the C1 group (0.42 [0.42-0.54] mg/kg vs 0.67 [0.64-0.71]mg/kg; P<0.05). Furthermore, the time to loss of consciousness in the C1 and C2 groups decreased by 60% and 53%, respectively, compared to the C0 group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of drug-related hypotension after anesthesia induction among the three groups. No adverse events of hypoxia, bradycardia, or injection pain were observed in any groups. In healthy, non-obese Chinese children undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair surgery, fentanyl 1µg/kg and 2µg/kg before ciprofol injection significantly reduced the ED50 of ciprofol for attenuating LMA response, with minimal occurrence of severe side effects.

ED50 and ED95 of Remimazolam Tosilate Combined with Different Doses of Fentanyl in Elderly Patients for Painless Gastroscopy.

The novel short-acting benzodiazepine drug, remimazolam tosilate, has been employed for sedation during endoscopic procedures. The optimal loading dosage of remimazolam tosilate in gastroscopy for elderly patients when co-administered with fentanyl remains unclear. Therefore, the primary objective of our research was to ascertain the median effective dose (ED50) and the 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam tosilate in combination with various fentanyl dosages for elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Seventy-five patients aged ≥65 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III were recruited to undergo elective painless gastroscopy. All patients were randomized assigned to group F1, group F2, and group F3, and were injected intravenously with different doses of fentanyl (0.5 ug/kg, 1 ug/kg, and 1.5 ug/kg) 3 minutes prior to the administration of remimazolam tosilate, respectively. The initial preset dose of remimazolam tosilate was 0.3 mg/kg in group F1, 0.2 mg/kg in group F2, 0.15 mg/kg in group F3. The dose gradient was 0.02 mg/kg per group according to the up-and-down sequential method. Probibt regression model was employed to determine the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam tosilate. The ED50 of remimazolam tosilate in group F3 was lower than that in group F1 and F2 (0.095 [0.088-0.108] mg/kg vs 0.162 [0.153-0.171] mg/kg; 0.258 [0.249-0.266] mg/kg, p < 0.05). The ED95 of remimazolam tosilate was 0.272 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.264-0.295 mg/kg) in group F1, 0.175 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.167-0.200 mg/kg) in group F2 and 0.109 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.101-0.135 mg/kg) in group F3. The total dosage of remimazolam tosilate decreased gradually with the increasing of fentanyl (p < 0.001). The frequency of injection pain was higher in group F1 compared to groups F2 and F3 (p < 0.05). The patients in group F3 had a lower incidence of hypotension than in groups F1 and F2 (p < 0.05). There was no respiratory depression, intraoperative consciousness, dizziness or delirium in the three groups. The concurrent use of fentanyl reduces the dosage of remimazolam tosilate required for sedative gastroscopy in elderly patients in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, 1.5 ug/kg fentanyl combined with remimazolam tosilate may reduce the incidence of hypotension and injection pain. These findings should be confirmed in a large-scale study.

Efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for curative endoscopic resection in colorectum: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCurative endoscopic resection is widely used to treat colonic polyps and early stage cancers. The anesthetic strategy commonly involves the use of propofol combined with a small dose of opioids for sedation. Adverse respiratory or cardiovascular events such as hypotension often occur when attempting to achieve the necessary level of sedation. Several studies have suggested its advantages owing to the anesthetic, analgesic, and sympathomimetic properties of esketamine. However, there are no reports on curative colorectal endoscopic resection. We designed this randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for sedation in patients undergoing curative colorectal endoscopic resection.MethodsA total of 166 patients who underwent curative colorectal endoscopic resection were randomly assigned to groups A (propofol + fentanyl) or E (propofol + esketamine). Ideal sedation was assessed using the MOAA/S scale and was achieved using TCI-propofol with different doses of fentanyl and esketamine. The propofol consumption and vasoactive drug dosages were recorded. Sedation-related times, adverse events, and satisfaction were recorded.ResultsOf the 160 patients, the total propofol consumption was significantly lower in group E (n = 81) (300 mg) than in group A (n = 79) (350 mg). Hypotension and bradycardia were significantly lower in Group E than in Group A. The groups showed no significant differences in other adverse events, induction time, recovery time, or patient or endoscopist satisfaction.ConclusionCompared to fentanyl, esketamine helps decrease propofol consumption and increases cardiovascular stability during curative colorectal endoscopic resection in American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I–III patients without affecting anesthesia, patient and endoscopist satisfaction, or other adverse events.Trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn; registration number: ChiCTR2300069014 on 03/03/2023).

Implementing physics-based digital patient twins to tailor the switch of oral morphine to transdermal fentanyl patches based on patient physiology

Fentanyl transdermal patches are widely implemented for cancer-induced pain treatment due to the high potency of fentanyl and gradual drug release. However, transdermal fentanyl up-titration for opioid-naïve patients is difficult, which is why opioid treatment is often started with oral/iv morphine. Based on the daily dose of morphine, the initial dose of the fentanyl patch is decided upon. After reaching a stable level of pain, the switch is made from oral/iv morphine to transdermal fentanyl. There are standard calculation tools for transferring from oral/iv morphine to transdermal fentanyl, which is the same for all patients. By considering the variations in the physiology of the patients, a unique switching strategy cannot meet the needs of different patients. This study explores the outcome in terms of pain relief and minute ventilation during opioid therapy. For this, we used physics-based simulations on a virtually-generated population of patients, and we applied the same therapy to all patients. We could show that patients' physiology, such as gender, age, and weight, greatly impact the outcome of the therapy; as such, the correlation coefficient between pain intensity and age is 0.89, and the correlation coefficient between patient's weight and maximum plasma concentration of morphine and fentanyl is -0.98 and -0.97. Additionally, a different combination of the duration of overlap between morphine and fentanyl therapy with different doses of fentanyl was considered for the virtual patients to find the best opioid-switching strategy for each patient. We explored the impact of combining physiological features to determine the best-suited strategy for virtual patients. Our findings suggest that tailoring morphine and fentanyl therapy only based on a limited number of features is insufficient, and increasing the number of impactful physiological features positively influences the outcome of the therapy.

Pain assessment in fentanyl-propofol combination: two dosage levels

Background. In the field of intravenous anesthesia, propofol is widely utilized as an induction agent. However, Propofol injection pain is a frequent adverse event that may result in discomfort for patients. Various strategies have been investigated to prevent or alleviate this pain, considering the presence of opioid receptors in the primary afferent nerve endings of peripheral tissues, which suggests a potential role of opioids in mitigating propofol-induced pain. Fentanyl, a short-acting pure opioid agonist commonly used for systemic analgesia during intraoperative and postoperative periods, has been found to possess peripherally mediated analgesic properties within its clinical dosage range. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a low dose of fentanyl in the fentanyl-propofol combination for reducing propofol injection pain.The objective of our study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two distinct doses of fentanyl in mitigating the pain associated with propofol injection.Materials and methods. The study enrolled 90 patients classified as ASA I–II who were scheduled for elective surgery. The study spanned over 4 months, from November 2022 to April 2023, and included patients aged 19 to 65 years. Patients were divided into three groups, each comprising 30 patients. The control group received only 5 ml (50 mg) of propofol. The group M1 received only 5 ml of a mixture of fentanyl and propofol, prepared with 20 ml (200 mg) of propofol and 2 ml (100 μg) of fentanyl, while the group M2 received only 5 ml of a mixture of fentanyl and propofol, prepared with 20 ml (200 mg) of propofol and 4 ml (200 μg) of fentanyl, at an injection speed of 0.5 ml/s. After 10 seconds of medication, patients were asked a standard question about the comfort of the injection, and a verbal rating scale (VRS) was used to assess propofol injection pain. Anesthesia induction was then continued following standard protocols. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05 for all analyses.Results. The three groups were found to be similar in terms of patient characteristics. In the control group, the incidence of severe pain upon propofol injection was 46.7%, whereas it was 0% in both groups M1 and M2 (p &lt; 0.05).Conclusion. The combination of fentanyl and propofol has been shown to effectively reduce the incidence of propofol injection pain. Interestingly, in this study, no significant difference was observed between the two different doses of fentanyl used in the mixture. This suggests that a low dose of fentanyl may be sufficient in achieving a pain-free environment during propofol induction, thereby offering a cost-effective approach in clinical practice.

Controlled Hypotension for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery With Two Different Doses of Fentanyl.

Background and Objectives Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a type of minimally invasive surgery done for acute and chronic sinus diseases or paranasal illnesses. The idea of FESS is to preserve the normal anatomy, which is non-obstructing and mucous membranewhile removing tissue obstructing OMC (osteo metal complex) and facilitating drainage. The critical structures, including the brain, orbit, and carotid veins, the lack of adequate operating room, and bleeding that obscures endoscopic vision throughout the procedure may increase the likelihood of unfavorable surgical results.This study seeks to examine the hemodynamic effects of intubation and extubation as well as the impact of fentanyl infusion on lowering blood pressure during FESS procedures. Materials and Methods Sixty-eight patients from the American Society of Anesthesiologistsclasses 1 and 2 who were planned for functional endoscopic sinus operations were randomly split into two groups for this randomized prospective trial. Group 1 patient belonging to the fentanyl 2 mcg per kg bolus 30 minutes before induction followed by 2 mcg per kg per hr infusion for 90 minutes of surgery, and Group 2 patient belonging to fentanyl 1 mcg per kg bolus 30 minutes before induction followed by 1 mcg per kg per hr infusion for 90 minutes of surgery. The significance of the difference in quantitative measures was measured using the student-t test, and the Chi-square test was used to measure upthe difference in proportion. Statistically significant was set at P<0.05. Results Mean systolic blood pressure was higher in members of Group 2 than in Group 1. In contrast to Group 2, Group 1 had considerably better surgical field conditions, surgeon satisfaction on the AONO'S scale, post-operative nausea and vomiting, and a post-operative VAS Score during the first 24 hours. Conclusion Pre-induction Fentanyl with infusion can effectively control hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

The comparative efficacy of two different doses of fentanyl on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: Prospective, randomized control trail

General anaesthesia with muscle relaxants using controlled ventilation involves laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, which is associated with haemodynamic changes in the form of tachycardia and hypertension due to increased sympathoadrenal activity and are probably of no consequence in healthy individuals, but they may be hazardous to those with Myocardial Insufficiency and cerebrovascular disease. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect of two different doses of fentanyl with etomidate as an induction agent in attenuating haemodynamic stress response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. A randomised control trial was carried out on 60 adult patients (ASA I, II, III) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 each i.e. group F2.5 and group F5 receiving fentanyl 2.5μg/kg and 5 μg/kg intravenously five minutes before intubation respectively. The pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and rate pressure product were recorded at various time intervals up to ten minutes after intubation. The study showed that both the doses were equally effective in blunting the pulse rate response, but the 5μg /kg proved significantly effective in blunting the blood pressure response. The rate pressure product, a measure of cardiac O2 consumption was found to be significantly lower in fentanyl 5μg/kg compared to fentanyl 2.5μg/kg. Hence, we conclude that fentanyl in 5 mcg/kg dose is more effective in attenuating hemodynamic responses to intubation as compared to 2.5 mcg/kg.

A comparison of different doses of fentanyl for patients undergoing elective colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Aim To investigate analgesic and side effects of different doses of fentanyl in combination with propofol for colonoscopy. Methods This prospective randomized double-blind study conducted between 2019 and 2020 included 64 patients. Patients were randomized: Group 1 (fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg) and Group 2 (fentanyl 1.0 μg/kg) both in combination with propofol. Ramsay sedation score (RSS) was obtained at 5 with an additional dose of propofol. The primary outcome was the patient's postprocedural pain and adverse events during and after the procedure. Results The RSS means were statistically lower for Group 2 at the beginning and every 5 minutes of the procedure. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) for Group 2 (first, 5, 25 and 30 min) was significantly lower (p=0.000, and heart rate (HR) was significantly higher for Group 1 (during the entire procedure) (p=0.000) than in another group; peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) was significantly lower for measurements within both groups (Group 1, 5, 10, 15 min; Group 2, 5, 10,15 min) (p=0.000 and p=0.000, respectively). Anxiety (p=0.010), weakness (p=0.000) and confusion (p=0.023) proved to be significantly higher for Group 1, and hypotension (p=0.001) for Group 2 than in another group. No statistical significance of Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) (p=0.501) and Aldrete recovery score (ARS) (p=0.845) was found. Conclusion There was no significance in postprocedural abdominal pain between the group of patients administered fentanyl at a dose of 0.5 μg/kg and the group of patients administered fentanyl at a dose of 1.0 μg/kg; however, prevalence of complications was more significant in the group with a fentanyl at a dose of 0.5 μg/kg.

Application of different doses of fentanyl combined with ketorolac tromethamine for painless gastroscopy in elderly obese patients

Application of different doses of fentanyl combined with ketorolac tromethamine for painless gastroscopy in elderly obese patients

Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Three Different Doses of Fentanyl on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Patients under General Anaesthesia

Aim of Study: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are the commonest method for securing a definitive airway for general anaesthesia. It is one of the most invasive and painful stimuli in anaesthesia producing clinically relevant changes in the hemodynamic variables.&#x0D; This study has been designed to compare the safety and efficacy of three different doses of fentanyl (2µg/kg, 3µg/kg and 4µg/kg) in attenuating hemodynamic response, following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: In this observational study, three groups of 90 patients belonging to ASA grade I and II, aged between 18 to 65&#x0D; years, including either gender, posted for elective surgery under GA with informed consent. Baseline vital hemodynamic parameters and the serial heart rate, arterial pressures, SpO2 and respiratory rate were noted at five minutes after intravenous fentanyl administration, during laryngoscopy &amp; intubation and at 1-, 3-, 5-, 10- and 20-minutes after laryngoscopy. Ramsay sedation scores were also noted at five minutes after intravenous fentanyl administration, during extubation and at 10-, 20- and 30-minutes after extubation.&#x0D; Results: There was substantial difference in mean HR, SBP, DBP &amp; MAP values post 5 minutes after intravenous fentanyl administration, during laryngoscopy, at 1, 3-, 5-, 10- and 20-minutes following laryngoscopy and intubation between the three groups. Patients’ behaviour belonging to group C (IV fentanyl 4µg/kg), followed by the patients of group B (IV fentanyl 3µg/kg) presented considerable amount of attenuation of all the hemodynamic stress parameters effectively, with statistically significant results when compared to group A (IV fentanyl 2µg/kg).&#x0D; Conclusion: Intravenous fentanyl 4µg/kg and 3µg/kg are better at attenuating the laryngo-tracheal stress response, in comparison to intravenous fentanyl 2µg/kg.

EVALUATION OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH FENTANYL IN COLONOSCOPY

Background: Colonoscopy is one of the most common procedures. Sedation and analgesia decrease anxiety and discomfort and minimize risks. Therefore, patients prefer to be sedated in examination. Until now, there is no known drug that is ideal for sedation during colonoscopy. Recently, Propofol is an intravenous hypnotic with rapid onset and short duration of action, thus, propofol has assumed a prominent position.The combination propofol with opioids are used to relieve the patient’s pain and discomfort. Objectives: Comparison of propofol alone in combination with different doses of fentanyl to find the most effective dose for sedation in colonoscopy. Methods: In a prospective, randomized clinical study, 120 patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital. Patients in this study were divided into three groups: Group I received intravenous fentanyl (0.5 mcg/kg) 2-3 min followed by propofol (1.5 mg/kg) IV; Group II received fentanyl (1.0 mcg/kg) 2-3 min followed by propofol (1.5 mg/kg) IV; Group III received intravenous anesthesia propofol (1.5 mg/kg). If the patient is awake during endoscopy, bolus propofol 0.5 mg/kg. The study variables included: pulse, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, quality of sedation, total dose of propofol used, number of awakenings, time to resuscitation, patient and endoscopist satisfaction, side effects of sedation such as slow pulse, low blood pressure, respiratory failure, nausea,.... Results: Patients in Group II had either lower incidence of reaction (motor or verbal) to the colonoscopyintroduction or lower propofol consumption but awaking-time was longer. The time from stop propofol until the patient was awake was longer in group 2 than in group 1 and group 3. Group 2 reached the desired level of sedation faster than group 1 and group 3. Other results was not different between three groups. Conclusion: The combination of fentanyl (1.0 mcg/kg) and propofol (1.5 mg/kg) for colonoscopy sedation reduces propofol consumption and provides greater result. Key words: Colonoscopy, fentanyl, propofol.

Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Bupivacaine associated with different doses of fentanyl: randomized clinical trial

ObjectiveAssess patients submitted to elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, and the efficacy of different doses of fentanyl associated with bupivacaine. MethodsThe study included 124 pregnant women randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 31) according to different doses of fentanyl (15 μg, 10 μg, 7.5 μg), Groups I, II, and III, respectively, and control group IV, associated with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg). An epidural catheter was inserted in case epidural top-up was required. We assessed the anesthetic blockage characteristics, negative maternal and neonatal outcomes, and maternal side effects. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher’s exact and chi-square tests. The level of significance was 5% (p < 0.05). ResultsThe quality of analgesia, time for the first complaint of pain and motor block recovery time were significantly better for groups that received fentanyl in comparison to controls (p < 0.001). None of the groups had negative maternal-fetal outcomes. Nausea was significantly more frequent in patients in Groups II (10 µg) and III (7.5 µg) when compared to Groups I (15 µg) and IV (no fentanyl). Vomiting was more frequent in Group III than in Group I (p = 0.006). The incidence of pruritus was significantly higher in the groups receiving fentanyl (p = 0.012). ConclusionsAmong the solutions studied, the spinal anesthesia technique using 15 µg of fentanyl associated with 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine provided satisfactory analgesia and very low incidence of adverse effects for patients submitted to cesarean section. Trial Registration NumberUTN U1111-1199-0285. REBECRBR-5XWT6T.

Effects on newborns of applying bupivacaine combined with different doses of fentanyl for cesarean section.

BACKGROUNDThe choice of anesthesia for cesarean section is very important.AIMTo compare the effects of applying bupivacaine combined with different doses of fentanyl on newborns after cesarean section. METHODSWe randomly divided one hundred and twenty patients undergoing cesarean section into the following 4 groups: group B (bupivacaine group), group BF10 (bupivacaine combined with 10 µg fentanyl), group BF30 (bupivacaine combined with 30 µg fentanyl) and group BF50 (bupivacaine combined with 50 µg fentanyl). The heart rate, mean arterial pressure, block plane fixation time and sensory block time were recorded. Umbilical artery blood was then collected immediately after fetal delivery for blood gas analysis and qualitative detection of fentanyl. Additionally, data on the neonatal 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores, results of umbilical artery blood gas analysis and qualitative detection of fentanyl in umbilical artery blood were recorded.RESULTSAlthough the mean arterial pressure decreased in all four groups at 3 min after anesthesia, the percentage of the decrease was less than 20% of the baseline. In addition, there were no significant differences in the 1-min or 5-min Apgar scores or the umbilical artery blood gas analysis among the four groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, the concentration of fentanyl in umbilical artery blood was qualitatively detected using an ELISA kit, and the results in the four groups were negative.CONCLUSIONBupivacaine combined with fentanyl spinal anesthesia is effective in cesarean section.

Low dose spinal with chlorprocaine a prospective observational study

Low-dose spinal saddle anaesthesia is a safe and reliable anaesthesia technique in outpatient perianal surgery, which provides a reliable but restricted block with good surgical conditions. Chloroprocaine was re-introduced without antioxidant and preservatives, which can be used safely in spinal anesthesia. Fentanyl is an opiod agonist, acts on mu receptor and of addition of fentanyl to chlorprocaine appears to lengthen the regression to L1 dermatome while minimally lengthening duration of block. This study was done to compare the effects of two different doses of fentanyl as an adjuvant to 1% Chloroprocaine under saddle block for perianal surgeries, and duration of stay in hospital.Materials and Methods: The study was a randomized controlled double blinded trial conducted on 45 patients aged between 18 – 65 years (ASA 1 and 2) posted for perianal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia in private hospitals in and around Dakshina Kannada from January 2018 to June 2021. The groups are assigned as follows: Group A (n = 15) received1% Chloroprocaine 20 mg plus 0.5 ml of normal saline intrathecally. Group B (n = 15) received1% Chloroprocaine 20mg plus fentanyl 15 µg (0.3ml) + 0.2ml of normal saline intrathecally.Group C (n = 15) received1% Chloroprocaine 20 mg plus fentanyl 25 µg (0.5ml) intrathecally. The sensory block, modified bromage scale, post operatively analgesia duration and the rescue analgesia patient’s and surgeon’s satisfaction score, side effects were noted.Observations and Results: There was no significant difference in the maximum Bromage score for the motor block it was 11.57 seconds in Group and Group B and 11. 11.6 in group C . NRS score that denotes the quality of analgesia was higher in group A indicating that the satisfaction was lesser .In the group A the time was the longest followed by group B and group C had the least two segment sensory regression time and was statistically significant with a p value< 0.05. In our study in the group A the time for motor regression to baseline was the highest followed by group C and group B had the least time for the motor regression to baseline and was statistically significant with a p value < 0.05.group A required the highest number of analgesia doses followed by group B and group C required equal number of analgesia and was statistically significant with a p value < 0.05. Group A had the least patient and surgeon satisfaction scores followed by group B and group C had the maximum time and was statistically significant with a p value < 0.05.Conclusion: Group B had better hemodynamic parameters than group A and group C . Group C was associated with a lot of adverse event intra op like hypotension and group A had a higher need of analgesic and faster sensory loss Hence, considering the nature and duration of the procedure, low dose saddle block anaesthesia with 2-Chloroprocaine would be a suitable choice and we evaluated the drug in varying doses to study the clinical response of varying doses, for procedures lasting for small duration 20 mg is sufficient, the addition of fentanyl may be adjusted based on the expected time of surgery.

Role of pre–extubation fentanyl in mastectomy: a randomized, controlled, double–blind study

Background: Both tracheal intubation and extubation are associated with dangerous consequences such as tachycardia, hypertension, myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias. The aim was to evaluate pre–extubation two different doses of fentanyl on hemodynamic stabilization and delayed recovery in mastectomy.&#x0D; Methodology: The randomized controlled double–blind study was conducted on 126 patients aged 16–60 years, with controlled hypertension, receiving chemotherapy before surgery and underwent mastectomy for breast cancer. Patients were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups. Before extubation, patients received 10 ml saline in group (C), 1 µg/kg fentanyl in Group–F1: and 2 µg/kg fentanyl in Group–F2. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at T1 (after maintenance of anesthesia), T2 (after giving the test drug), T3 (immediately after extubation), T4 (5 min. after extubation) and T5 (15 min after extubation).&#x0D; Results: MAP was significantly lower in fentanyl groups compared to Group–C at T2 and T3 without significant deference between fentanyl groups. HR was significantly lower in fentanyl groups compared to Group–C and in Group–F2 compared to Group–F1 at T3, T4 and T5. Time of extubation was significantly prolonged in Group–F2 compared to Group–F1 and Group–C without a significant difference between Group–F1 and Group–C.&#x0D; Conclusions: Pre–extubation fentanyl 1 µg/kg blunted cardiovascular responses to extubation without respiratory depression or prolonged recovery. Pre–extubation fentanyl 2 µg/kg provide more control in HR but with delay in the extubation time compared to 1 µg/kg of fentanyl.&#x0D; Key words: Pre–Extubation, Fentanyl, Mastectomy, Hemodynamics, Recovery&#x0D; Preregistration: The study was registered in the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (approval number: 281)&#x0D; Citation: Salman A, Zayed NO, Mansour A, Howaidi R, Foly AG, ElSharkawy MS, Abdelgalil AS. Role of pre–extubation fentanyl in mastectomy: a randomized, controlled, double–blind study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(2):143-149. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i2.1462.&#x0D; Abbreviations: CST=Craniosacral therapy; SMT=Sensorimotor training; NCLBP=Nonspecific chronic low back pain; VAS=Visual analogue scale; ODI=Oswestry disability index, BDI-II=Beck depression inventory-II, and SF-36=Short Form-36; CSF=cerebral spinal fluid; CSS=craniosacral system; PRM=primary respiratory movements&#x0D; Received: 27 June 2020, Reviewed: 24 July 2020, Accepted: 27 July 2020

Comparative analysis of effects of three different doses of fentanyl and standard dose of bupivacaine on a spinal block in patients with hip endoprosthesis surgery

Introduction/Objective. Spinal anesthesia is often used for hip endoprosthesis surgery. Significant surgical stress response consisting of hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory changes can be initiated by the hip replacement surgery. Intrathecal opioids, as adjuvants to local anesthetics, make spinal block sufficient even with lower doses of the local anesthetics, and the incidence of the side effects reduce to minimum. Methods. This study included 162 patients of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiology classification (ASA) 1?2, scheduled for total hip arthroplasty. The patients had spinal anesthesia with 10 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine with 20 ?g (Group I), or 25 ?g (Group II) or 30 ?g fentanyl intrathecally (Group III). Results. Mean time to achieve maximum motor and sensory blockade was with no significant difference among the groups. Time of motor block duration was shorter in the Group III. Four hours after the operation, patients in the Group I had significantly higher cortisol serum levels. Blood glucose levels were with no significant difference among the groups. Levels of CRP increased remarkably postoperatively in the Group I. Incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the Group III. Pruritus and shevering were not recorded among the groups. The first time an analgetic was needed postoperatively was the longest in the Group III. Conclusion. The dose of 10 mg of bupivacaine combined with 25 ?g fentanyl was the optimal option to achieve hemodynamic stability, sufficient sensory and motor blockade, and reduce the stress response and incidence of the opioids side effects such as vomiting, nausea, pruritus etc.

English

English

A Comparative Study of Two Different Doses of Fentanyl 2mcg/kg and 4 mcg/kg in Attenuating the Hemodynamic Stress Response During Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

A Comparative Study of Two Different Doses of Fentanyl 2mcg/kg and 4 mcg/kg in Attenuating the Hemodynamic Stress Response During Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

Effect of fentanyl on block characteristics as adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for lower limb surgeries

Background:Regional anesthesia is the preferred technique for most of lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries as it allows the patient to remain awake and minimize the problems associated with airway management. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, although extensively used for spinal anesthesia, has a limitation of short duration. The addition of fentanyl, a synthetic lipophilic opioid, is known to prolong postoperative analgesia.Aims:We aimed to study the effect of the addition of different doses of fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine about hemodynamic changes, the extent of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and complications that occur during the procedure.Settings and Design:This study was a prospective, comparative, randomized, and double-blind study.Materials and Methods:Patients were randomly allocated to three groups of 30 each. Group I (n [number of patients] = 30) received bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2.0 mL diluted up to 2.5 mL with normal saline. Group II (n = 30) received bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2.0 mL and fentanyl 20 μg diluted up to 2.5 mL with normal saline, and Group III (n = 30) received bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2.0 mL and fentanyl 50 μg diluted up to 2.5 mL with normal saline.Statistical Analysis:The data were analyzed using Chi-square and Student's t-test.Results and Conclusions:The onset of sensory and motor block was early in Group III in comparison to Group I and Group II (P < 0.05). The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group III, followed by Group II, and least in Group I. None of the patients in Groups I and II had any complications such as hypotension, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and pruritus. However, the incidence of hypotension, nausea, and pruritus was more in Group III. 2 mg intrathecal bupivacaine with 20 μg fentanyl provides reliable and satisfactory sensory and motor block without increasing the incidence of side effects.

Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis.

Fentanyl and morphine are the 2 most commonly added opioids to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Numerous clinical trials have assessed efficacy and safety of different doses of fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia, yet its benefit, harm, and optimal dose remain unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence of the efficacy of fentanyl when added to intrathecal bupivacaine alone and when added to bupivacaine with morphine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Key electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for randomized controlled trials in the cesarean delivery population. The primary outcome was the failure rate of spinal anesthesia, as assessed by the need for either conversion to general anesthesia or intraoperative analgesic supplementation. Two reviewers independently extracted the data using a standardized electronic form. Results are expressed as relative risks or mean differences with 95% CIs. Seventeen randomized controlled clinical trials (most judged as low or unclear risk of bias) with 1064 participants provided data for the meta-analysis. Fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine alone reduced the need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia (relative risk, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.11-0.27; number needed to treat, 4) and the incidence of nausea/vomiting (relative risk, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.70; number needed to treat, 6.5), with longer time to first postoperative analgesia request (mean difference, 91 minutes; 95% CI, 69-113). No difference was observed regarding the need for conversion to general anesthesia (relative risk, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.12-3.57), the incidence of hypotension, the onset of sensory block, or the duration of motor block. However, the addition of intrathecal fentanyl was associated with higher incidence of intraoperative pruritus (relative risk, 5.89; 95% CI, 2.07-16.79; number needed to harm, 13.5). The inclusion of fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine-morphine compared to intrathecal bupivacaine-morphine alone conferred a similar benefit, with a significantly reduced need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia (relative risk, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.95; number needed to treat, 9). Analysis using a funnel plot indicated a possibility of publication bias in included studies. Current evidence suggests a benefit of using fentanyl as both an additive to intrathecal bupivacaine alone and to intrathecal bupivacaine combined with morphine for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The possibility of publication bias, small sample size, and high risk of bias in some of the included studies warrant treating the results with caution.