Differences In Pain Management Research Articles

Enhancing Equity in Clinical Research: A Multifaceted Proposal for Spondyloarthritis.

Clinical research advances medical knowledge and improves healthcare outcomes. However, disparities in research participation hinder progress. The Unmet Research Needs in Spondyloarthritis Conference IV highlighted critical insights and strategies to enhance equity in clinical research. Talks focused on engaging underrepresented communities and addressing disparities in rheumatic diseases, particularly spondyloarthritis (SpA), to ensure research results are generalizable and inclusive. Disparities in SpA management, such as greater back pain severity among Black and Hispanic Americans and sex-based differences in pain management, emphasize the need for equitable research. Dr. Elizabeth Ferucci discussed the racial disparities in rheumatologic care, highlighting the importance of early access to rheumatologists and culturally informed primary care to improve outcomes. Dr. Hani El-Gabalawy's talk on engaging Indigenous communities stressed the importance of community consent and reciprocal benefits. Dr. Sarfaraz Hasni's presentation on mitigating disparities in research participation underscored the need for inclusive practices and strategies to promote diverse representation. Finally, Dr. Edith Williams emphasized institutional approaches to fostering equity, including diverse recruitment practices and institutional review board alignment with diversity priorities. Strategies to enhance equity in clinical research include community engagement, addressing logistical barriers to participation, and ensuring diverse research teams. These approaches can dismantle barriers for underrepresented communities, making research more accessible and reflective of the broader population. The SpA research community must commit to creating structures that foster inclusivity, ensuring medical advancements benefit all populations, especially historically underrepresented groups. The principles and strategies proposed serve as a roadmap for achieving equity in SpA research.

Owner survey suggests cats may be undertreated for pain compared to dogs after an elective ovariohysterectomy or orchiectomy.

To investigate differences in pain management between dogs and cats after surgical sterilization. We hypothesized that dogs would be more likely to be discharged with analgesics after sterilization compared to cats and that owner compliance would be better in dogs. 175 respondents owning 92 dogs and 83 cats from a high-volume, low-cost veterinary clinic in Michigan during August 2022. Owners received an online survey designed to assess their pet's postoperative analgesic care. They were asked demographic information about themselves and their pets. Additionally, they were asked if their pet was discharged with analgesics, if they were administered as prescribed, and if their pet was painful at home. Dogs and cats were included if they were sterilized within 6 months of survey completion and in the owner's care at the time of the procedure. The survey was distributed to 5,241 owners and received 227 responses, a response rate of 4.4%. Analgesics were prescribed for 19 of 162 (12%) pets: 14 of 88 (16%) dogs and 5 of 74 (6.7%) cats. There was no difference in the prescription of analgesics between dogs and cats after ovariohysterectomy (P = .09) or orchiectomy (P = .73). 15 of 19 owners reported their compliance in administering analgesics at 78.9%. Owners' subjective assessments showed that 24 of 86 (28%) dogs and 12 of 68 (17%) cats appeared painful at home. Postoperative pain in cats may not be appropriately managed.

Pain in head and neck cancer survivors in South Africa: A cross-sectional study

Background: Pain is often a significant symptom in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of pain, factors limiting effective pain management, and whether differences in pain management exist between the public and private health sectors in South Africa in HNC patients after they have completed treatment.Methods: A cross-sectional survey using the Brief Pain Inventory was performed on adults over the age of 18 years treated for HNC of any subsite in both a public and private hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.Results: Overall pain scores indicated mild levels of pain and impact on daily activities. The domains of life most affected by pain were general activity, sleep and mood. There was no difference in pain scores between public hospital patients versus those with private insurance. Less than half of the patients reported receiving all their necessary medications. Most of the postoperative pain was managed with paracetamol, tramadol and ibuprofen, with only 12.8% of patients using morphine.Conclusion: This study provides a survey of pain experiences in HNC patients in a middle-income country. Insurance status did not significantly impact pain experiences, indicating equitable access to pain management resources. However, the overall utilisation of morphine and medications used to treat neuropathic pain is low. Further research is needed into the complex factors associated with pain in HNC patients.Contribution: This article is an example of a standard clinical study on patient-reported outcome measures.

Gender Differences among Nurses in Managing Arterial Puncture-Related Pain: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

There is evidence that healthcare can be executed differentially depending on the gender of patients, researchers, and clinicians. The aim was to analyze the possible existence of nursing gender differences in pain management produced by arterial puncture for blood gas analysis. A cross-sectional, multicenter study designed was conducted in Castilla-la Mancha (Spain). Variables of interest were collected from nurses in the public health system of a European region through a questionnaire. Data were collected for four months; the primary outcome was the use of any intervention to reduce pain and the explanatory variable was the nurse's gender. Bivariate analysis was carried out to assess associations between gender and pain-reducing interventions and a multivariate model was created with those factors that were relevant using logistic regression. A significantly higher proportion of men reported using some form of intervention (45% vs. 30%) and had more specific training (45.9% vs. 32.4%). The adjusted probability of using pain-reducing interventions by men was 71% higher than women. Thus, we found gender differences in the management of pain caused by arterial punctures performed by nurses as the main healthcare providers.

Gender-based differential management of acute low back pain in the emergency department: A survey based on a clinical vignette.

Women may receive suboptimal pain management compared with men, and this disparity might be related to gender stereotypes. To assess the influence of patient gender on the management of acute low back pain. We assessed pain management by 231 physicians using an online clinical vignette describing a consultation for acute low back pain in a female or male patient. The vignette was followed by a questionnaire that assessed physicians' management decisions and their gender stereotypes. We created an online clinical vignette presenting a patient with acute low back pain and assessed the influence of a patient's gender on pain management. We investigated gender-related stereotyping regarding pain care by emergency physicians using the Gender Role Expectation of Pain questionnaire. Both male and female physicians tended to consider that a typical man was more sensitive to pain, had less pain endurance, and was more willing to report pain than a typical woman. These stereotypes did not translate into significant differences in pain management between men and women. However, women tended to be referred less often for imaging examinations than men and were also prescribed lower doses of ibuprofen and opioids. The physician's gender had a modest influence on management decisions, female physicians being more likely to prescribe ancillary examinations. We observed gender stereotypes among physicians. Our findings support the hypothesis that social characteristics attributed to men and women influence pain management. Prospective clinical studies are needed to provide a deeper understanding of gender stereotypes and their impact on clinical management.

Erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The 2018 guidelines for enhanced recovery in thoracic surgery recommend paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative pain management. However, recent studies demonstrate that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) achieves similar postoperative pain control with reduced block-related complications. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESPB versus PVB for pain management after thoracic surgery. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched through December 2022 (PROSPERO registration - CRD42023395593). Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, resting at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and at movement at 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or block-related complications in the first 48 hours. Ten randomized control trials enrolling a total of 624 total patients were included. There were no significant differences in pain scores, resting or at movement, at any time points except reduced resting pain scores at 12 hours with PVB (mean difference [MD]) 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.88). Opioid consumption demonstrated no significant differences at 24 hours; PVB reduced opioid consumption at 48 hours (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.89). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea or vomiting. ESPB exhibited a nonsignificant trend toward reduced cumulative block-related complications (risk difference [RD] 0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.00). Compared with PVB, ESPB is safe and demonstrates no clinically significant differences in pain management after thoracic surgery.

Treating Prehospital Pain in Children: A Retrospective Chart Review Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Prehospital Pediatric Ketamine and Opioid Analgesia

Prior to 2020, pain management in the Washtenaw/Livingston County Medical Control Authority (W/L MCA) Emergency Medical Service (EMS) system in Southeast Michigan was limited to morphine, fentanyl, ketorolac, and acetaminophen. Based on the increasing evidence describing its safety and efficacy, ketamine was added to local protocols for pain management. This study aimed to evaluate differences in pain management and adverse effects of ketamine and opioid administration. Data from pediatric patients who received ketamine or an opioid in the W/L MCA EMS system from October 2019 to March 2021 were analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in pain score, and the secondary outcome was adverse effects observed after analgesic administration. The decrease in pain scores was greater among ketamine patients (mean: 5.2) compared to opioid patients (mean: 2.9), p < 0.001. The prevalence of adverse effects was higher among patients in the ketamine group (28.6%) compared to patients in the opioid group (2.4%, p < 0.001). Of 14 patients who received ketamine, one 17-year-old male experienced mild anxiety (7.1%), two teenage females experienced mild dissociation (14.3%), and one 20-year-old female experienced mild nausea (7.1%). Overall, ketamine is a safe and effective option compared to opioids for pediatric patients experiencing moderate to severe prehospital pain.

Race and Sex Are Associated With Variations in Pain Management in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Undifferentiated Abdominal Pain

BackgroundPain management is critical to the management of patients in the emergency department (ED). The clinical decision-making process for prescribing medications is complicated by its subjective nature. Historically, racial and ethnic minority groups and women have not had their pain managed as aggressively as White and male patients. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether race and biological sex affect the pain management process by means of evaluating data from a large hospital system with diverse patient demographic characteristics. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of adult patients who presented an ED within the hospital system and were discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of undifferentiated abdominal pain during a single year. Patient pain was classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and patients were further stratified by race, ethnicity, sex, and insurance status. Pain management was assessed by narcotic vs non-narcotic administration. ResultsA total of 32,676 patients were included in the study. Narcotic administration was more likely in White patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain (22%) compared with Black patients (12%; adjusted odds ratio 0.50; 95% CI 0.46–0.54). This persists across patient-reported pain scores. In addition, women (16.99%) were prescribed narcotics less often than men (19.41%; p < 0.0001). ConclusionsAlthough differences in pain management practices have been explored previously, this study provided a large, updated, multifacility assessment that confirmed that race- and sex-based differences in pain management persist, specifically in the decision to treat with narcotics. Further investigation is warranted to determine the root causes of these differences.

HealthCare educational differences in pain management, adverse childhood experiences and their relationship to substance use disorder education

BackgroundIn order to assist the State of Ohio in the United States in addressing the opioid epidemic, the Ohio Attorney General appointed experts in a variety of academic disciplines to the Scientific Committee on Opioid Prevention and Education (SCOPE). The focus of SCOPE is the application of scientific principles in the development of prevention and educational strategies for reducing substance use disorder (SUD). One area of focus for SCOPE was SUD education of healthcare professionals. The objective of the present was to identify the content and extent to which future healthcare professionals are trained in pain management, SUD, and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).MethodsIn December of 2019, a survey was distributed to 49 healthcare professional schools in Ohio that included the following disciplines: medicine, pharmacy, advanced practice registered nurse (APRN), physician assistant, dentistry, and optometry. The survey included four domains: initial screening of patients, training in SUD, training in care for patients at high risk for SUD, and education in evaluating patients for ACEs. Descriptive statistics were calculated.ResultsThirty one of the forty-nine schools completed the survey. Most disciplines indicated that some form of basic training in the principles of SUD were taught in their core curriculum. The training on ethical issues surrounding SUD were not as widely covered (range 0-62.5%). Medicine, APRN, physician assistant, and pharmacy schools had a “moderate” to “great” extent of pharmacologic therapy curriculum integration. Other pain management strategies were “somewhat” to “moderately” integrated. There were variations seen in training on risk of medication misuse based on various contributors to health. At least 67.7% of medicine, APRN, physician assistant, and pharmacy programs included motivational interviewing training. The extent to which schools integrated education regarding ACEs into their curriculum varied from 0 to 66.7%.ConclusionsThe study finding suggests a need for a unified, consistent, and expanded training requirement in the foundations of pain management, SUD, and ACEs in professional healthcare education.

Gender Difference in Pain Management Among Adult Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Assessment

ObjectiveTo compare gender differences in pain management among adult cancer patients in Saudi Arabia and to explore the predictors associated with attitudinal barriers of cancer patients to pain management.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 325 cancer patients from tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia.ResultOf the total participants, 67.4% were women (N = 219) and 32.6% were men (N = 106). The overall mean scores of the attitudinal barriers questionnaire were 49.51 ± 13.73 in men and 54.80 ± 22.53 in women. The analysis shows significant differences in scores in subscales of tolerance (men = 7.48 ± 2.37), (women = 8.41 ± 3.01) (p = 0.003) and fear of distraction in the course of treatment (men = 6.55 ± 1.34), and (women = 7.15 ± 2.63) (p = 0.008). Female patients reported a more moderate to severe level of pain than men (worst pain in last week of 7.07 ± 1.50, worst pain in last week of 5.84 ± 2.65, respectively). Splitting by gender, the significant predictor for physiology effect domains in male cancer patients includes age, marital status, employment status, monthly income, cancer type, and presence of comorbid disease (p < 0.050). Age was a significant predictor of the domains of fatalism, communication, and harmful effects (p < 0.050) among female cancer patients.ConclusionThe present study revealed significant differences between men and women with attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management. Managing pain requires the involvement of all methods in a comprehensive manner, thus unalleviated pain influences the patient’s psychological or cognitive aspect.

Unrecognized Postoperative Opioid-Induced Movement Disorder: A Case Report

A 22-year-old man, with a medical history significant for posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain, underwent ankle surgery at the United States Naval Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan. His immediate postoperative course was complicated by episodic muscle rigidity, necessitating admission for diagnostic evaluation. The differential was necessarily broad and included local anesthetic toxicity, medication mediated effect, seizures, serotonin syndrome, and malignant hyperthermia. Cultural and systemic differences in patient care delivery at a Japanese hospital helped to elucidate the mechanism. This case highlights cultural differences in pain management and navigates the differential of an acute onset movement disorder in the immediate postoperative period.

Pain-Associated Clusters Among Nursing Home Residents

Chronic pain is common in older adults, particularly among nursing home residents (NHR). Internationally, the reported pain prevalence among NHR ranges from 3.7% to 79.5%. At least one in two German NHR are diagnosed with pain. Unrelieved chronic pain is associated with reduced physical functioning and psychological parameters. Given the high prevalence of pain among NHR, we hypothesized that there were likely pain-associated clusters in our target group. Clustering is an opportunity to identify differences in pain management and may enable better targeted health-service delivery for professionals. There are no available data regarding pain-associated clusters (sub-groups of NHR) based on different items measuring pain. This study was performed using baseline data, and was part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 12 nursing homes in Berlin. We assessed pain using the German Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-NHR) among 137 NHR (mean age, 83.33 years) capable of self-report. We performed hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis to generate three clusters (naming is based on the mean value of each BPI-NHR item in each cluster): pain-relieved (46.72 %), pain-restricted (22.63 %), and severe pain (30.66 %). Body-Mass-Index (F(2,129) = 4.274, P = 0.016), Barthel-Index (F(2,133) = 3.246, P = 0.042), and appropriateness of pain medication (F(2,119) = 12.007, P = 0.000) differed between clusters. Parameters associated with an increased or decreased risk of being in a pain-diagnosed cluster will be discussed. The observed need for clinical interventions aiming at shifting from pain-diagnosed clusters to pain-relieved status will be reflected.

Pain-Associated Clusters Among Nursing Home Residents and Older Adults Receiving Home Care in Germany

ContextThere are no available data regarding pain-associated clusters among nursing home residents (NHRs) and older adults receiving home care with chronic pain. ObjectivesTo identify and describe pain-associated clusters in NHRs and older adults receiving home care with chronic pain and to explore associations with clusters in both settings. MethodsWe surveyed 137 NHRs and 205 older adults receiving home care. Clusters were identified using hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis, using Ward's method with squared Euclidean distances in the proximities matrix. The clusters were characterized based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with different clusters. ResultsIn each setting, we identified three clusters: pain relieved, pain impaired, and suffering severe pain. In the nursing home study and home care study, respectively, the participant distributions were 46.72% and 11.71% in the pain-relieved cluster, 22.63% and 33.66% in the pain-impaired cluster, and 30.66% and 54.63% in the severe-pain cluster. Appropriate pain medication was only detected among pain-relieved NHRs. ConclusionOverall, differences in pain management exist within the two care settings presented here. There is potential for improvement in both settings. Moreover, there exists a need for clinical interventions aiming at shifting from pain-affected clusters to pain-relieved status.

Is There Gender Discrimination in Acute Renal Colic Pain Management? A Retrospective Analysis in an Emergency Department Setting

BackgroundPain is a widespread problem, affecting both men and women; studies have found that women in the emergency department receive analgesic medication and opioids less often compared with men. AimsThe aim of this study was to examine the administration and management of analgesics by the medical/paramedical staff in relation to the patients' gender, and thereby to examine the extent of gender discrimination in treating pain. DesignThis is a single-center retrospective cohort study that included 824 patients. SettingsEmergency department of tertiary hospital in Israel. Participants/SubjectsThe patients stratified by gender to compare pain treatments and waiting times between men and women in renal colic complaint. MethodsAs an acute pain model, we used renal colic with a nephrolithiasis diagnosis confirmed by imaging. We recorded pain level by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and number of VAS examinations. Time intervals were calculated between admissions to different stations in the emergency department. We recorded the number of analgesic drugs administered, type of drugs prescribed, and drug class (opioids or others). ResultsA total of 824 patients (414 women and 410 men) participated. There were no significant differences in age, ethnicity, and laboratory findings. VAS assessments were higher in men than in women (6.43 versus 5.90, p = .001, respectively). More men than women received analgesics (68.8% versus 62.1%, p = .04, respectively) and opioids were prescribed more often for men than for women (48.3 versus 35.7%, p = .001). The number of drugs prescribed per patient was also higher in men compared with women (1.06 versus 0.93, p = .03). A significant difference was found in waiting time length from admission to medical examination between non-Jewish women and Jewish women. ConclusionsWe found differences in pain management between genders, which could be interpreted as gender discrimination. Yet these differences could also be attributed to other factors not based on gender discrimination but rather on gender differences.

Evaluating for Racial Differences in Pain Management of Long-Bone Fractures in a Pediatric Rural Population.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine if a racial disparity exists in the administration of an analgesic, time to receiving analgesic, and type of analgesic administered to children with long-bone fractures. Prior studies have reported the existence of racial disparity but were mostly in adult and urban populations.MethodsThis is a retrospective chart review of 727 pediatric patients (aged 2–17 years) with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (or 10th revision) codes for long-one fractures in an emergency department that cares for a suburban and rural population between January 2013 and January 2016. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio of receiving no analgesic versus receiving an analgesic and receiving a nonopioid versus opioid drug. Linear regression analysis was performed to study the relationship between race and time to receive the analgesic, after adjusting for sex, age, insurance type, and mechanism of injury.ResultsOf the 727 children, 27% of them did not receive analgesics regardless of race. 27% (164/605) of white children, 25% (8/31) of African American children, and 24% (12/49) of Hispanic children did not receive analgesics. African Americans are 12% more likely (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–2.61) to receive an analgesic compared with whites, and Hispanics are 22% more likely (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.60–2.45) to receive an analgesic than whites. African Americans are 26% less likely (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.31–1.75) to receive an opioid versus a nonopioid compared with whites, and Hispanics are 92% more likely (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.91–4.17). Mean wait time across all races was 69 minutes, with no statistical difference between groups.ConclusionsThis study showed no statistical significance in the receipt or type of analgesic or wait time for pediatric long-bone fractures between race in a major academic level 1 trauma children's hospital, despite previous literature citing otherwise. This study augments to the few studies conducted in a rural setting. It is also one of the few studies that analyzed pain management in a large pediatric population as well as used waiting time to receive analgesic as an outcome measure. Overall, we found a mean wait time of 69 minutes for analgesic administration regardless of race, suggesting the need for more prompt pain management across all races for the management of long-bone fracture in the pediatric population.

947: Using electronic medical record data to quantify racial and ethnic differences in pain management following cesarean birth

Racial disparities in pain management have been documented in health care settings. We sought to evaluate associations between patient race and ethnicity and pain management following cesarean birth. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mothers following cesarean birth at North Carolina Women's Hospital between 7/1/2014 and 6/30/2016. Maternal pain scores (0-10) and medication administration were documented in Epic Electronic Medical Record (EMR) as part of routine clinical care. We used these data to determine frequency of pain assessment, pain scores, and administration of opiate analgesia from 0 to 48 hours postpartum (PP). Opiates administered were converted to 5 mg oxycodone tablet equivalents (OTE). We excluded from our sample women who received general anesthesia, were in the intensive care unit after delivery, were currently treated with methadone or buprenorphine, or received ≥2 opiate prescriptions during antenatal care. We used chi square tests to compare prevalence of severe pain, indexed by pain scores > 7, and linear regression models to compare OTE administered by maternal race/ethnicity, adjusting for insurance status, primary language, age, and primiparity. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. 1,970 women underwent cesarean section during the study period, of whom 1,776 met inclusion criteria. EMR records included 32,361 pain assessments and 13,989 opiate doses administered from 0-48 hours after c-section. The number of pain assessments differed by race-ethnicity, with the highest number of assessments for non-Hispanic white women (Table, p<.001). Mean pain scores were highest for non-Hispanic black women (Figure), and these women were most likely to have at least one pain assessment >7/10, whereas Asian women were the least likely (chi square p < .001). Although non-Hispanic black women reported higher pain scores, they received less opiate analgesia than non-Hispanic white women (OTE mean, [se] 0-24h PP: 7.0 [0.3] vs. 8.1 [0.3]; 24-48h PP: 7.8 [0.5] vs 8.7 [0.5], p<.001), as did Asian, Hispanic and other women, adjusting for insurance, language, age, and primiparity. We found racial differences in pain scores and administration of opiates. EMR data can be leveraged to identify differences in care delivery that may contribute to health disparities.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Racial Disparities in Management of Appendicitis Pain in Children and Adolescents

In a cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, investigators evaluated differences in pain management by patient race among patients ≤21 years of age presenting with appendicitis to participating emergency departments (EDs) from 2003 to 2010. Of nearly 1 million patients (mean age, 14 years), 87% were white …

Emergency medical services provider comfort with prehospital analgesia administration to children.

The undertreatment of pediatric pain is a significant concern among families, clinicians, and researchers. Although some have examined prehospital pain management, the deterrents to pediatric analgesia administration by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) have not yet been examined in Canada. Problem This study describes EMS pain-management practices and prehospital provider comfort treating pediatric pain. It highlights differences in pain management between adults and children and assesses the potential barriers, misconceptions, difficulties, and needs related to provision of pediatric analgesia. A study-specific survey tool was created and distributed to all Primary Care Paramedics (PCPs) and Advanced Care Paramedics (ACPs) over four mandatory educational seminars in the city of Edmonton (Alberta, Canada) from September through December 2008. Ninety-four percent (191/202) of EMS personnel for the city of Edmonton completed the survey. The majority of respondents were male (73%, 139/191), aged 26-35 (42%, 80/191), and had been in practice less than 10 years (53%, 101/191). Seventy-four percent (141/191) of those surveyed were ACPs, while 26% (50/191) were PCPs. Although the majority of respondents reported using both pain scales and clinical judgement to assess pain for adults (85%, 162/191) and adolescents (86%, 165/191), children were six times more likely than adults (31%, 59/191 vs 5%, 10/191) to be assessed by clinical judgement alone. Emergency Medical Services personnel felt more comfortable treating adults than children (P < .001), and they were less likely to treat children even if they were experiencing identical types and intensities of pain as adults (all P values <.05) and adolescents (all P values < .05). Twenty-five percent of providers (37/147) assumed pediatric patients required less analgesia due to immature nervous systems. Three major barriers to treating children's pain included limited clinical experience (34%, 37/110), difficulty in communication (24%, 26/110) and inability to assess children's pain accurately (21%, 23/110). Emergency Medical Services personnel self-report that children's pain is less rigorously measured and treated than adults' pain. Educational initiatives aimed at increasing clinical exposure to children, as well as further education regarding simple pain measurement tools for use in the field, may help to address identified barriers and discomfort with assessing and treating children.

The relationship between patient age and pain management of acute long-bone fracture in the ED

ObjectiveCertain patient populations may be unable to communicate their needs in the emergency department (ED) setting, and the ability to communicate varies between age groups. We aim to determine if there are differences in pain management of acute long-bone fracture (ALBF) among age groups presenting to the ED. MethodsThis study was a retrospective chart review of a consecutive sample of subjects over 13 months. Fracture site, subject age, arrival time, whether pain medication was administered, and time to initial administration were recorded. Subjects were categorized into 3 groups based on age: pediatric (<18 years), adult (≥18 and <65 years), and geriatric (≥65years). ResultsA total of 1255 patients were included in analysis. One hundred seventy-seven (78.0%) pediatric, 364 (86.5%) adult, and 486 (80.1%) geriatric patients received pain medication during their ED stay. Median and average times to initial pain medication administration with 95% confidence intervals were 44 and 52.0 minutes (45.9-58.1), 39 and 53.6 minutes (48.8-58.4), and 55 and 73.2 minutes (68.1-78.3) for pediatric, adult, and geriatric groups, respectively. A single-factor analysis of variance indicated a significant difference between the groups (P < .01). Student t tests revealed significant differences between pediatric and geriatric groups (P < .01) and adult and geriatric groups (P < .01). ConclusionsAlthough most patients presenting to the ED with ALBF were geriatric, these patients were the least likely to have their pain addressed in a timely fashion. Subgroup analysis of pediatric and geriatric populations indicates significant delay, especially for those ages younger than 3 and 85 years and older. We believe that patients within these groups experience the greatest difficulty communicating their needs effectively due to age-related issues.

Characterizing Analgesic Use during Air Medical Transport of Injured Children

Background. Pain management is an important aspect of emergency care for children suffering traumatic injuries. Objectives. The objectives of this study were to characterize analgesic administration to injured children during air medical transport, to describe factors associated with analgesic use, and to examine the effects of patient race on analgesia. Methods. We used electronic records for patients transported by a regional air medical transport agency. We retrospectively examined data from 2003–2012 for patients ≤15 years old suffering traumatic injuries. We used bivariable analyses to identify associations for multivariable logistic regression models to determine factors associated with our outcomes –documentation of pain score and analgesic administration. Results. Of 5,057 patients, the median age was 8 (IQR 3–12) years. The majority of patients were male (66%, 95% CI 64–66%), were white non-Hispanic (83%, 95% CI 82–84%), and had no pain score documented (61%, 95% CI 60–62%). While only 15% of patients received analgesics overall, 70% with an initial pain score ≥5 received analgesics. In unadjusted models, non-white race was associated with lower odds of having a pain score documented (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.44–0.62) and receiving analgesics (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.82). After adjusting for confounders, there was no evidence of racial differences in pain management. Multivariable analysis revealed that younger age, lack of intravenous access, higher Glasgow Coma Scale, systolic blood pressure <100, transportation from the scene, initial pain score <5, and not having a pain score documented were associated with lower odds of receiving analgesics. Conclusions. Few pediatric patients had pain scores documented and fewer received analgesics during air medical transport for injuries. Racial differences in analgesia seen in unadjusted analyses did not persist after controlling for confounders. Resources, training, and appropriate pain management protocols should be made available to facilitate pain assessment in children as a strategy for increasing appropriate analgesic use during transport.