Difference In Overall Survival Research Articles

Impact of baseline steroids on the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND Immunochemotherapy involving the combination of programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors with chemotherapy has advanced the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The use of corticosteroids as pretreatment might reduce immunotherapy efficacy. AIM To investigate the impact of baseline corticosteroid use on neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nIC) outcomes in locally advanced ESCC patients. METHODS Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received nIC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were included. Patients were divided into dexamethasone and antihistamine groups on the basis of the administered pretreatment. Antiallergic efficacy and safety were evaluated, as well as its impact on short-term efficacy [complete pathological response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR)] and long-term efficacy [overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS)] of nIC. RESULTS From September 2019 to September 2023, 142 patients were analyzed. No severe treatment-related adverse events or deaths were observed. Allergy occurrence was greater in the antihistamine group (P = 0.014). Short-term efficacy was not significantly different: The pCR rates were 29.9% and 40.0%, and the MPR rates were 57.9% and 65.7% in the dexamethasone and antihistamine groups, respectively. The long-term efficacy was not significantly different: The 2 years OS rates were 95.2% and 93.5%, and the 2 years PFS rates were 90.3% and 87.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference in OS between the 20 mg dexamethasone group and the < 20 mg dexamethasone group, but PFS was significantly greater in the 20 mg dexamethasone group (93.9% vs 56.4%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Dexamethasone or antihistamines can be used before nIC in locally advanced ESCC without affecting short- or long-term efficacy. Administering 20 mg dexamethasone before nIC may improve PFS in ESCC.

Prognostic impact of DTA mutation and co-occurring mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

To evaluate the frequency and prognostic significance of DTA (DNMT3A、TET2、ASXL1) gene mutation and co-occurring mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The clinical data of 102 newly diagnosed MDS patients who accepted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the patients had DTA gene mutation, the patients were divided into DTA mutated (DTA-mut) group and wild type (DTA-wt) group, and the relationship between gene mutation and clinical characteristics and prognosis was analyzed. Among the 102 MDS patients, 96% (98/102) presented with mutation, while the mean number of mutations was 3.04 mutations/patient. DTA-mut was detected in 56.9% (58/102) patients. The most frequent co-mutated genes in DTA-mut group were SF3B1 (25.8%), RUNX1 (24.1%), U2AF1 (18.9%), SRSF2, EZH2, SETBP1 (17.2%), STAG2 (15.5%), IDH2 (12.1%) and BCOR, CBL (10.3%). The two groups showed no significant differences in ages, blood parameters, bone marrow blasts, WHO 2022 classification, IPSS-R risk category and rate of conversion to leukemia. Compared with the DTA-wt group, the mutation frequency of RUNX1 was higher (P = 0.02), while mutation frequency of TP53 was lower (P = 0.001) and the mutation frequency of ≥ 3 co-mutated genes was higher in DTA-mut group (P = 0.00). Survival analysis showed that the overall survivals (OS) of DTA-mut patients was significantly inferior to that of DTA-wt patients (P = 0.0332). According to IPSS-R classification, a statistically significant difference in OS was only observed in higher risk (IPSS-R > 3.5) group (P = 0.0058). In the context of DTA mutation, the OS of patients with RUNX1 mutation was shorter than that of patients without RUNX1 mutation significantly (P = 0.0074). The OS of patients with SF3B1 mutation was longer than that of patients without SF3B1 mutation, but there was no statistical difference (P = 0.0827). DTA mutations were not independent prognostic factors when DTA and co-mutated genes with frequency > 10% were considered in Cox regression model (P = 0.329). However, multivariate analysis confirmed an independently adverse prognosis of RUNX1 co-mutation (P = 0.042, HR = 2.426, 95% CI:1.031-5.711) in DTA-mut cohort. Moreover, our multivariable analysis suggests that SRSF2-mutwas an independent poor prognostic factor for all MDS patients (P = 0.047), but lost significance (P = 0.103) for DTA-mut patients. DTA mutations are frequently observed in patients with MDS, often accompanied by genes involved in RNA splicing and transcription factors like SF3B1 and RUNX1. DTA and concomitant mutations affect prognosis in MDS patients and RUNX1 was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with DTA mutations.

Choosing Wisely Between Radiotherapy Dose-Fractionation Schedules: The Molecular Graded Prognostic Assessment for Elderly Glioblastoma Patients.

This study aimed to develop a graded prognostic assessment (GPA) model integrating genomic characteristics for elderly patients with glioblastoma (eGBM), and to compare the efficacy of different radiotherapy schedules. This multi-institutional retrospective study included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with or without temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed eGBM. Based on the significant factors identified in the multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), the molecular GPA for eGBM (eGBM-molGPA) was established. A total of 334 and 239 patients who underwent conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) were included, respectively, with 86% of patients receiving TMZ-based chemoradiation. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months (range, 3.3-149.9), the median OS was 18.7 months for CFRT+TMZ group, 15.1 months for HFRT+TMZ group, and 10.4 months for radiotherapy alone group (CFRT+TMZ vs. HFRT+TMZ: HR 1.52, p<0.001; CFRT+TMZ vs. radiotherapy alone: HR 2.52, p<0.001). In a combined analysis with the NOA-08 and NORDIC trials, CFRT+TMZ group exhibited the highest survival rates among all treatment groups. The eGBM-molGPA, which integrated four clinical and three molecular parameters, stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. CFRT+TMZ significantly improved OS compared to HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone in the low-risk (p=0.023) and intermediate-risk groups (p<0.001). However, in the high-risk group, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment options (p=0.770). CFRT+TMZ may be more effective than HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone for selected eGBM patients. The novel eGBM-molGPA model can guide treatment selection for this patient population.

Final Overall Survival Analysis of S1500: A Randomized, Phase II Study Comparing Sunitinib With Cabozantinib, Crizotinib, and Savolitinib in Advanced Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) signaling pathway plays a role in the pathogenesis of selected patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). In the phase II PAPMET trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02761057), cabozantinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival and improved objective response rate compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced PRCC. Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) analysis. In this multicenter, randomized phase II, open-label trial, 147 patients with advanced PRCC who have received up to one previous therapy (excluding vascular endothelial growth factor-directed agents) were assigned to sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib, or savolitinib. Ultimately, savolitinib and crizotinib arms were closed because of futility. With a median follow-up of 17.5 months, the median OS was 21.5 months (95% CI, 12.0 to 28.1) with cabozantinib and 17.3 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 21.8) with sunitinib (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.36; P = .46). The OS landmark estimates for cabozantinib and sunitinib were 50% versus 39% at 24 months and 32% versus 28% at 36 months. In conclusion, we observed no significant difference in OS across treatment arms. Although cabozantinib represents a well-supported option for advanced PRCC, the lack of survival benefit underscores the need to develop novel therapies for this disease.

Oncological outcomes of minimally invasive surgery in non-endometrioid endometrial Cancer patients with varying prognostic risks: a retrospective cohort study based on the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 2020 guidelines

BackgroundNon-endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (NEEC) are characterized by their rarity and adverse prognoses. This study evaluates the outcomes of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in NEEC patients stratified by prognostic risks according to the 2020 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk classification guidelines.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 99 NEEC patients who underwent initial surgery at Fujian University Cancer Hospital. Patients were categorized into two groups: those undergoing MIS and those undergoing open surgery. We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between these groups. Cox regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for DFS, which were further validated via bootstrap statistical methods.ResultsThe study included 31 patients in the MIS group and 68 in the open surgery group. The demographics and clinical characteristics such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, histological subtypes, and FIGO stage were similar between groups (P > 0.05). The MIS group experienced ten recurrences (1 vaginal, 2 lymph nodes, 7 distant metastases), whereas the open surgery group had seven recurrences (1 vaginal, 3 lymph nodes, 1 pelvis, 2 distant metastases), yielding recurrence rates of 10.3% versus 25.6% (P = 0.007). Besides lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), surgical approach was also identified as an independent prognostic factor for DFS in high-risk patients (P = 0.037, 95% CI: 1.062–7.409). The constructed nomogram demonstrated a robust predictive capability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.767. Survival analysis for high- and intermediate-risk patients showed no significant differences in OS between the two groups (Phigh risk = 0.275; Pintermediate−risk = 0.201). However, high-risk patients in the MIS group exhibited significantly worse DFS (P = 0.001).ConclusionThis investigation is the inaugural study to assess the impact of surgical approaches on NEEC patients within the framework of the latest ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk classifications. Although MIS may offer clinical advantages, it should be approached with caution in high-risk NEEC patients due to associated poorer DFS outcomes.

The role of local ablative therapy in patients with advanced invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung

PurposeInvasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) of the lungs is a rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with a limited understanding of its prognosis, particularly in advanced stages. This study aimed to assess the prognosis of patients with advanced IMA by focusing on treatment modalities.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study evaluated 33 patients with IMAs diagnosed with advanced-stage disease or disease progression after curative treatment between 2011 and 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). OS and PFS were calculated from the date of the diagnosis of advanced IMA.ResultsThe study cohort included 13 patients at the initial advanced stage and 20 patients who progressed after curative treatment. Treatment modalities included conventional chemotherapy in 24 patients (72.7%), targeted therapy in seven (21.2%), immunotherapy in 13 (39.4%), and local ablative therapy (LAT) in 13 (39.4%). The median OS was 32 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9–61.0), with LAT significantly associated with improved OS compared to non-LAT treatment (not reached vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in OS based on conventional chemotherapy (p = 0.396), targeted therapy (p = 0.655), or immunotherapy (p = 0.992). In multivariate analysis, LAT remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 0.125; 95% CI, 0.026–0.608; p = 0.01). PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 3.6–13.7), with no significant differences observed among the treatment modalities.ConclusionOur findings suggest that LAT may provide favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced IMA.

Treatment options for tumor progression after initial immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study

ObjectiveWhether to continue administering immunotherapy to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced tumor progression remains controversial after immunotherapy. The aims were to explore survival outcomes after further immunotherapy post-progression and to determine the optimal combination therapy in such cases. MethodsOverall, 507 patients with NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy and experienced tumor progression were retrospectively divided into Immuno-combination and No-immuno groups according to whether additional combination therapy involving immunotherapy was administered post-progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatment regimens for patients in the Immuno-combination group. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, there were 150 patients in the No-immuno group and 300 patients in the Immuno combination group. Superior PFS was observed in the Immuno-combination group compared with those in the No-immuno group (6-month PFS: 25.3 % vs. 60.6 %; 12-month PFS: 6.7 % vs. 24.4 %; P < 0.001). Similar intergroup differences were observed for OS (12-month OS: 22.3 % vs. 69.4 %; 18-month OS: 6.4 % vs. 40.4 %; P < 0.001). Superior PFS outcomes were observed in the Immuno+Antiangiogenic group compared with the Immuno+Chemo group (6-month PFS: 51.3 % vs. 71.5 %; 12-month PFS: 23.1 % vs. 25.7 %; P = 0.017). Similar differences in OS were observed between those same subgroups (12-month OS: 62.1 % vs. 77.9 %; 18-month OS: 33.3 % vs. 48.7 %; P = 0.006). ConclusionPatients with NSCLC experiencing tumor progression post-immunotherapy can still benefit from further treatment, with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy the most efficacious option.

Real-World Analysis of Survival and Treatment Efficacy in Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) poses a significant clinical challenge, with low survival rates despite advances in therapy. The lack of a standardised treatment approach complicates patient management. This study utilises real-world data from Guy's Thoracic Cancer Database to analyse patient outcomes, identify key predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and address the limitations of randomised controlled trials. This observational, single-centre, non-randomised study analysed 142 patients diagnosed with clinical and pathological T1/2 N2 NSCLC who received curative treatment from 2015 to 2021. Patients were categorised into three groups: Group A (30 patients) underwent surgery for clinical N2 disease, Group B (54 patients) had unsuspected N2 disease discovered during surgery, and Group C (58 patients) received radical chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone (CRT/RT) for clinical N2 disease. Data on demographics, treatment types, recurrence, and survival rates were analysed. The median OS for the cohort was 31 months, with 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 60% and 30%, respectively. Group A had a median OS of 32 months, Group B 36 months, and Group C 25 months. The median DFS was 18 months overall, with Group A at 16 months, Group B at 22 months, and Group C at 17 months. Significant predictors of OS included ECOG performance status, lymphovascular invasion, and histology. No significant differences in OS were found between treatment groups (p = 0.99). This study highlights the complexity and diversity of Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, with no single superior treatment strategy identified. The findings underscore the necessity for personalised treatment approaches and multidisciplinary decision-making. Future research should focus on integrating newer therapeutic modalities and conducting multi-centre trials to refine treatment strategies. Collaboration and ongoing data collection are crucial for improving personalised treatment plans and survival outcomes for Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients.

Clinical outcomes of first-line combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.

In metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), recent studies have shown promising efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy. However, there are insufficient evidences about clinical efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy in metastatic non-ccRCC (nccRCC). We retrospectively investigated 44 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (ICI + ICI group) or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (ICI + TKI group), and assessed clinical efficacy in both groups. Of all patients, overall response rate and disease control rate for ICI combination treatments were 36.3% and 75%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 8.8 and 23.9months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of liver metastasis significantly affected worse PFS and OS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.049). Importantly, PFS and OS seemed similar in ICI + ICI group and ICI + TKI group (p = 0.778 and p = 0.559). Although the discontinuation rate of the combination therapy due to adverse effects in patients aged ≥ 75years was significantly higher compared to that in patients aged < 75years (45% versus 12%, p = 0.017), there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between two groups (p = 0.290 and p = 0.257, respectively). This study confirms clinical benefit of ICI combination therapy for metastatic nccRCC patients in real-world settings. Furthermore, the effectiveness of combination therapy was comparable between patients aged < 75 and those ≥75years with respect to clinical prognosis.

A Single Institution Experience in the Management of Localized Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Bladder

BackgroundNeuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder (NEC-bladder) is a rare disease associated with poor outcomes in the setting of heterogenous histologic classifications and variable treatment approaches. Materials and MethodsPatients with localized NEC-bladder treated with surgery or radiation between 2001-2021 were retrospectively identified. Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0) and downstaging were evaluated following NAC in surgically-treated patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with univariable (log-rank) and multivariable (MVA; Cox regression) methods. ResultsSixty-five patients were included. Majority were male (87.7%) and the median age was 73. The distribution of tumor histology was small cell (64.6%) or urothelial with Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation NE differentiation (35.4%). Most patients (69.2%) received NAC, predominantly platinum/etoposide. Patients were treated with definitive local therapy by surgery (78.5%) or chemoradiation (21.5%). The majority (62.7%) of surgical patients had pT2 or greater disease with 37.3% having pN+. The pCR and downstaging rates were 21.6% and 35.1%, respectively. With median follow-up of 60 months (m), 50.7% of patients had recurrence, leading to a median PFS and OS of 16.4m and 25.9m, respectively. Receipt of NAC was associated with improved PFS (p=0.04) and downstaging improved PFS (p=0.012) and OS (p<0.001). Patients receiving NAC with ypN0 had median OS of 69.9m vs 15.3m in those with ypN+ (p<0.001). MVA identified receipt of NAC and pN as predictors of PFS; pN was the only predictor of OS. Notably, no differences in PFS or OS were seen between histology of primary tumor (small cell vs NE differentiation) or pathologic lymph nodes (NE alone [31.6%], pure urothelial [47.4%], or mixed [21.1%]. The brain metastasis rate was 10.8% with all patients having small cell histology. ConclusionsOptimized therapy in NEC-bladder includes NAC followed by local consolidation. Ascertainment of ypN0 is associated with long term survival, while pN+remains associated with poor outcomes. MicroabstractWe performed a retrospective analysis of 65 patients with localized primary neuroendocrine cancers arising from the bladder and describe oncologic outcomes, prognostic factors, and identify predictors of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate outcomes related to the histology of pathologically-involved lymph nodes, in which we found no significant differences. We further found that patients with residual ypN+ disease or no pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy may derive benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. When comparing the primary surgical cohort vs those that underwent bladder preservation with radiotherapy, we found no significant differences in various endpoints.

Regorafenib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors versus regorafenib monotherapy as a late-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Few data are available on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with late-line regorafenib monotherapy or combined with other therapies. This study thus aimed to examine regorafenib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with regorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced CRC. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with advanced CRC who experienced recurrence and progression after standard first- and second-line treatments treatment from November 2018 to December 2021. The patients received regorafenib plus ICIs or regorafenib monotherapy. Treatment response was evaluated based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed via multivariate analysis. The combined group and the monotherapy group included 30 and 43 patients, respectively. The median OS (13.7 vs. 10.1 months; P=0.10) and PFS (4 vs. 3.6 months; P=0.32) were not significantly different between the two groups. In males, the median OS was significantly longer in the combined group compared with the monotherapy group (not reached vs. 8.03 months; P=0.02), but the median PFS showed no significant difference (7.23 vs. 3.90 months; P=0.16). There was no significant difference in OS (P=0.71) or PFS (P=0.89) in females. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 1 [vs. 0; hazard ratio (HR) =3.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61-6.10; P<0.001] was independently associated with PFS. ECOG PS 1 (vs. 0; HR =3.63, 95% CI: 1.54-8.56; P=0.003) and combined therapy (vs. monotherapy; HR =0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.99; P=0.048) were associated with OS. Regorafenib combined with ICIs led to numerically longer PFS and significantly prolonged OS in patients with mCRC compared to regorafenib monotherapy, especially in male patients.

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThis study was conducted to investigate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsPatients with AGC who received NACT before surgery were enrolled in either the LTG or OTG group. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:2) was performed between the two groups based on the propensity score using a 0.15 calliper width. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between these two groups before and after PSM. OS and DFS rates were calculated by the Kaplan‒Meier method, and any differences in survival were evaluated with a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate the simultaneous effects of prognostic factors on survival and the hazard ratio (HR) between LTG and OTG patients.ResultsA total of 144 patients completed the follow-up, with 24 patients in the LTG group and 120 patients in the OTG group. After a mean follow-up of 64.40 months, there were no significant differences in the 3-year OS or DFS rates between the two groups before (P = 0.453 and P = 0.362, respectively) or after PSM (P = 0.972 and P = 0.884, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that ypN stage was an independent risk factor for worse OS (P = 0.013).ConclusionsThis study showed that LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by an experienced surgical team resulted in comparable 3-year OS and DFS compared with OTG in patients with AGC after NACT.Trial registrationThis study is not registered.

Prognostic Factors in Japanese EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

The prognosis of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer has improved significantly since the advent of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). We aimed to investigate the relationship between patient characteristics, EGFR genotype, therapeutic agents, and the prognosis of the patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 198 Japanese patients with unresectable EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs at Toho University Sakura Medical Center from April 2006 to December 2021. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients who received osimertinib had a significantly longer OS than did those not receiving it (median OS, 36.2 versus 20.7 months; p < 0.001).There were significant differences in OS between patients with EGFR mutation who received osimertinib as first-line treatment, T790M-positive patients who received osimertinib as second- or later-line treatment, and those who did not receive it (median OS, 28.2 versus 40.2 versus 20.7 months; p = 0.003). However, in T790M-negative patients, no significant difference in OS was noted between those who did and did not receive osimertinib as post-treatment (median OS, 28.0 versus 40.0 months; p = 0.619). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that osimertinib treatment was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.480; 95% confidence interval, 0.326-0.707; p < 0.001). The patients who were T790M-positive in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and were given osimertinib as the second or later line treatment had a better prognosis than the patients who were T790M-negative in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and could not receive osimertinib.

Radiotherapy with S-1 for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 75 years or older

ObjectiveExplore the efficacy and safety of involved-field irradiation (IFI) combined with S-1 as definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for locally advanced elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), under the premise of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).MethodsWe designed a prospective single-arm phase II study. The study enrolled 91 patients aged 75 to 92 years. Eligible participants had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, stage II to IV disease based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). All elderly patients (EPs) received dCRT with S-1. which was administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions or 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), local control rate (LCR), and safety.ResultsFrom July 2017 to July 2021, we enrolled EPs with ESCC who were treated at the Jiangsu Cancer hospital. As of August 1, 2023, the median follow-up of surviving EPs was 31.4 months (IQR: 25.2 to 72.6 months). 83 patients (91.2%) completed the whole course of treatment. The 2-year OS rate was 59.2%, and the PFS rate was 43.7%. The most common grade 1 to 2 adverse effects (AEs) were radiation esophagitis (79.1%), and then were radiation pneumonia (46.2%). Anemia (41.8%) was the most common of grade 1 to 2 hematologic toxicity. The incidence of grade 3 or above AEs was 24.2%, and the incidence of leukopenia was the highest (11.0%). There was not one death due to treatment-related toxicity. In a subgroup analysis of radiotherapy doses, we found no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.465) and OS (P = 0.345) in EPs with ESCC who received 50.4 Gy and 61.2 Gy, and that patients in the 50.4 Gy group had lower dermatitis (P = 0.045) and anemia (P = 0.004).ConclusionsIF-IMRT combined with S-1 is a promising regimen for elderly ESCC. And the radiotherapy dose of 50.4 Gy remains the standard dose for EPs with ESCC undergoing CCRT.

Radiotherapy dosing in intracranial ependymoma using the national cancer database.

To determine the dose-dependent effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival for pediatric intracranial ependymomas and explore patient and disease characteristics that experience survival benefit from higher doses. Data was accessed from the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria was comprised of a diagnosis of non-metastatic intracranial ependymoma, World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 or 3, surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy between 4500-6300cGy, and non-missing survivorship data. Crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to estimate the associations of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimations were used to visualize survival curves for dosing for the general cohort and by subgroups (age, resection extent, and grade). Of the 1154 patients who met inclusion criteria, 405 received ≤ 5400cGy and 749 received > 5400cGy. We found no difference in OS crude (0.95, 95% CI 0.72-1.06) or adjusted (0.88, 95% CI 0.46-1.69) HR for those receiving ≤ 5400cGy. KM curves showed no difference in OS for dosing for the general cohort based on age, surgical extent, and grade. However, there was better OS in those with WHO grade 2 tumors compared to grade 3 regardless of dose received. There was no difference in OS between patients who received ≤ 5400cGy compared to > 5400cGy. We found improved OS in those with grade 2 tumors compared to grade 3, however there was no difference in OS based on dose received by tumor grade, age, or resection extent. Limitations in data available prevent exploring other outcomes or toxicity.

Long-term outcomes of smoker and drinker with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma after oesophagectomy: a large-scale propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundOesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) poses a considerable health burden, particularly in regions such as East Asia. This study aims to investigate the long-term outcomes of OSCC patients who are...

What alters prognosis in patients who were operated for lung cancer with lymph node metastasis?

In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgery with proven lymph node metastasis. Patients who were operated for lung cancer with pN1 or pN2 were examined in the study. The clinicopathological features and survival of the subjects were evaluated according to pN1-pN2 status, presence of neoadjuvant treatment, Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) avidity on mediastinal lymph nodes and specific lymph node stations. The study examines 100 patients operated from January 2016 to December 2021. Number of cases with pN1 and pN2 disease were 45 (45%) and 55 (55%) respectively. Thirty (30%) patients received neoadjuvant treatment. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the patients were computed as 42.5% and 42.4% correspondingly. The 5-year cancer-related survival was 55.3%. In pN2 cohort, 5-year DFS was 67.9% in the neoadjuvant group and 15.9% in the non-neoadjuvant group (P = 0.042). In non-neoadjuvant group, 5-year DFS was 19.9% in cases with mediastinal PET/CT avidity and 56.3% in patients without mediastinal PET/CT avidity (P = 0.018). In pN2 disease, the presence of subcarinal or paratracheal lymph node metastasis did not create a significant difference in 5-year OS or DFS, but pulmonary ligament lymph node metastasis was found to be linked with worse survival in both 5-year OS (P = 0.005) and DFS (P = 0.017). The main elements related with poor prognosis were absence of neoadjuvant treatment and pulmonary ligament lymph node metastasis in pN2 disease, detecting PET/CT avid mediastinal lymph nodes in non-neoadjuvant group.

National Landscape of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Colon Cancer

IntroductionSurgery followed by pathology-guided adjuvant therapy is standard treatment for colon cancer. Data from the FOxTROT clinical trial showed potential benefit of a 6-wk neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in T3/T4 patients. The present study evaluated real-world outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in a national cohort of patients with resectable colon cancer. Methods169,120 patients with clinical stage I, II, or III colon cancer from the National Cancer Database registry were included. Patients were categorized as having received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (NACT), surgery then adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), or surgery alone. Factors associated with treatment sequencing and outcomes were assessed. ResultsOf identified patients, 1.4% received NACT including 0.5% of stage I, 1.8% of stage II, and 3.0% of stage III. For stage I, 5-y overall survival (OS) was 74.7% after AC, 62.2% after NACT, and 76.4% after SA. For stage II, 5-y OS was 73.2% after AC, 66.8% after NACT, and 64.3% after SA. For stage III, 5-y OS was 67.3% after AC, 67.7% after NACT, and 42.4% after SA. Cox proportional-hazards model suggested NACT had worse outcomes versus AC in clinical stages I (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-1.85, P < 0.01) and II (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.52, P < 0.01). In stage III, there was no difference in OS between NACT and AC (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.99-1.22, P = 0.05). ConclusionsIn a real-world national cohort of patients with resectable colon cancer, NACT had no OS benefit over AC. Future studies should examine which subset of patients might benefit from neoadjuvant approaches.

The impact of trial inclusion criteria on outcomes in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP in the first line: a Danish nationwide study

Up to 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients are ineligible for participation in clinical trials. Ineligible patients have inferior outcomes, but less is known about the impact of commonly used organ-function-based inclusion criteria on drug efficacy estimates. Data on DLBCL patients treated with CHOP+/-rituximab were retrieved from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Trial inclusion criteria were extracted from four international DLBCL trials (REMoDL-B, GOYA, POLARIX, and HOVON-84). Differences in overall survival (OS) and 5-year restricted mean survival differences (5 y-RMSDs) between trial eligible and ineligible patients were computed. The effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was quantified by the 5 y-RMSD between CHOP and R-CHOP-treated patients and the impact of individual trial criteria on estimated effectiveness was quantified by Shapley-values. In total, 4,083 R-CHOP-treated and 890 CHOP-treated DLBCL patients were included. Across the trials, 18.6-29.3% of the included R-CHOP-treated patients were deemed ineligible for trial based on organ function and performance status alone. Ineligible patients had significantly worse survival, with adjusted absolute differences in 5-year OS of 9-15%. The impact of individual criteria on the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was small (Shapley-value range, −2.74-0.31). Using a smaller set of criteria derived from a data-driven approach, the number of eligible patients increased by 16-38% and the 5 y-RMSD increased by 0.7-3.1 months. In conclusion, OS among trial ineligible DLBCL patients is inferior as expected, but relaxing trial criteria would have increased the number of trial participants without making major changes in estimated efficacy for a hypothetical CHOP versus R-CHOP trial. This does not necessarily imply that trial findings based on selected patients are unreliable, as the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was only slightly affected by omitting selected inclusion criteria.

CD19 CAR T cells for B cell malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis focused on clinical impacts of CAR structural domains, manufacturing conditions, cellular product, doses, patient’s age, and tumor types

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T cells are one of the most remarkable cellular therapies for managing B cell malignancies. However, long-term disease-free survival is still a challenge to overcome. Here, we evaluated the influence of different hinge, transmembrane (TM), and costimulatory CAR domains, as well as manufacturing conditions, cellular product type, doses, patient’s age, and tumor types on the clinical outcomes of patients with B cell cancers treated with CD19 CAR T cells. The primary outcome was defined as the best complete response (BCR), and the secondary outcomes were the best objective response (BOR) and 12-month overall survival (OS). The covariates considered were the type of hinge, TM, and costimulatory domains in the CAR, CAR T cell manufacturing conditions, cell population transduced with the CAR, the number of CAR T cell infusions, amount of CAR T cells injected/Kg, CD19 CAR type (name), tumor type, and age. Fifty-six studies (3493 patients) were included in the systematic review and 46 (3421 patients) in the meta-analysis. The overall BCR rate was 56%, with 60% OS and 75% BOR. Younger patients displayed remarkably higher BCR prevalence without differences in OS. The presence of CD28 in the CAR’s hinge, TM, and costimulatory domains improved all outcomes evaluated. Doses from one to 4.9 million cells/kg resulted in better clinical outcomes. Our data also suggest that regardless of whether patients have had high objective responses, they might have survival benefits from CD19 CAR T therapy. This meta-analysis is a critical hypothesis-generating instrument, capturing effects in the CD19 CAR T cells literature lacking randomized clinical trials and large observational studies.