Difference In Liver Toxicity Research Articles

Comparison of Liver Injury in Patients Taking Methotrexate and Leflunamide in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that primarily affects the joints, leading to inflammation and potential joint damage. Methotrexate (MTX) and Leflunomide (LEF) are commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for RA, but their hepatotoxic effects require careful monitoring. Objective: This study aimed to compare the incidence of liver injury in RA patients treated with Methotrexate versus Leflunomide. Methods: This prospective study was conducted from January 2023 to June 2023 and included 80 RA patients aged 20 years or older, who reported to the Medicine Department at Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Lahore. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A received 20 mg/day Methotrexate (n=40), and Group B received 20 mg/day Leflunomide (n=40). Exclusion criteria included pregnant females, patients with hepatitis B or C, those with known allergies to Methotrexate or Leflunomide, and alcoholics. Baseline investigations, including liver enzyme levels (ALT/AST), were performed, and patients were monitored every three months. Hepatotoxicity was defined as an increase in ALT/AST levels to at least twice the upper limit of normal (ULN). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, with mean and standard deviation for quantitative data and frequency and percentage for qualitative data. The Chi-square test was used to compare variables, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 80 patients, 43 (53.75%) were female, and 37 (46.25%) were male. In Group A, 7 patients (17.5%) had elevated ALT/AST levels, while 6 patients (15%) in Group B exhibited elevated liver enzymes. The mean age was 52.4 ± 8.3 years in Group A and 50.6 ± 9.1 years in Group B. The mean BMI was 26.7 ± 3.5 kg/m² in Group A and 27.1 ± 3.8 kg/m² in Group B. No statistically significant difference in hepatotoxicity was observed between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Methotrexate and Leflunomide were equally effective in treating RA, with no significant difference in liver toxicity observed between the two groups. Both medications have comparable risks for hepatotoxicity, necessitating regular liver function monitoring during treatment.

Liver toxicity following reirradiation and multiple-target SBRT for primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

514 Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its safety in the treatment of multiple synchronous or recurrent lesions is underreported. We aim to better characterize SBRT-related hepatic toxicity in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with primary HCC who underwent SBRT for 2 or more synchronous or recurrent liver lesions. We collected patient characteristics and dosimetric data (mean liver dose, cumulative effective volume [Veff], cumulative volume of liver receiving 15Gy [V15Gy], and cumulative planning target volume [PTV]) along with liver-related toxicity (measured by albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] and Child-Pugh [CP] scores). We employed a linear mixed-effects model to assess the effect of multi-target SBRT on changes in ALBI. Results: There were 25 patients and 56 lesions with median follow-up of 29 months. Eleven patients had synchronous lesions and 14 had recurrent lesions treated with separate SBRT courses. Eight local failures occurred at a median of 8 months (range: 4 – 25 months) after SBRT. Among those receiving multiple SBRT courses, there were 7 lesions with overlap of V15Gy (median V15Gy overlap: 35mL, range: 0.5 – 388mL). There was no association between cumulative Veff, V15Gy, or PTV and change in ALBI. Four of 25 patients an increase of Child-Pugh (CP) score by ≥ 2 points, within 3 to 6 months after SBRT. Neither increase in CP nor ALBI were associated with cumulative Veff, V15Gy, and PTV. Comparing the groups that received SBRT in a single course versus multiple courses revealed no statistically significant differences in liver toxicity. Conclusions: LiverSBRT for multiple lesions in a single or in separate courses results in worsening of CP scores or ALBI in a small percentage of patients, suggesting a low risk of RILD. Prospective studies with a larger cohort are needed to better characterize safety in this population.

Biochemical Safety of SBRT to Multiple Intrahepatic Lesions for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

We aim to better characterize stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)-related hepatic biochemical toxicity in patients with multiple intrahepatic lesions from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with HCC who underwent SBRT for 2 or more synchronous or metachronous liver lesions. We collected patient characteristics and dosimetric data (mean liver dose [MLD], cumulative effective volume [Veff], cumulative volume of liver receiving 15 Gy [V15Gy], and cumulative planning target volume [PTV]) along with liver-related toxicity (measured by albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] and Child-Pugh [CP] scores). A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the effect of multi-target SBRT on changes in ALBI. There were 25 patients and 56 lesions with median follow-up of 29 months. Eleven patients had synchronous lesions, and 14 had recurrent lesions treated with separate SBRT courses. Among those receiving multiple SBRT courses, there were 7 lesions with overlap of V15Gy (median V15Gy overlap: 35 mL, range: 0.5-388 mL). There was no association between cumulative MLD, Veff, V15Gy, or PTV and change in ALBI. Four of 25 patients experienced non-classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), due to an increase of CP score by ≥2 points 3 to 6 months after SBRT. Sixteen of 25 patients experienced an increase in ALBI grade by 1 or more points 3 to 6 months after SBRT. Comparing the groups that received SBRT in a single course versus multiple courses revealed no statistically significant differences in liver toxicity. Liver SBRT for multiple lesions in a single or in separate courses is feasible and with acceptable risk of hepatotoxicity. Prospective studies with a larger cohort are needed to better characterize safety in this population.

Radiation dose is associated with improved local control for large, but not small, hepatocellular carcinomas

BackgroundWith advances in understanding liver tolerance, conformal techniques, image guidance, and motion management, dose-escalated radiotherapy has become a potential treatment for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate the possible impact of biologically effective dose (BED) on local control and toxicity among patients with HCC.Methods and materialsPatients treated at our institution from 2009 to 2018 were included in this retrospective analysis if they received definitive-intent radiotherapy with a nominal BED of at least 60 Gy. Patients were stratified into small and large tumors using a cutoff of 5 cm, based on our clinical practice. Toxicity was assessed using ALBI scores and rates of clinical liver function deterioration.ResultsOne hundred and twenty-eight patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 16 months. The majority of patients (90.5%) had a good performance status (ECOG 0–1), with Child-Pugh A (66.4%) and ALBI Grade 2 liver function at baseline (55.4%). Twenty (15.6%) patients had a local recurrence in the irradiated field during the follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses showed that only BED significantly predicted local tumor recurrence. Higher BED was associated with improved local control in tumors with equivalent diameters over 5 cm but not in smaller tumors. There was no difference in liver toxicity between the low and high-dose groups.ConclusionsHigher radiotherapy dose is associated with improved local control in large tumors but not in tumors smaller than 5 cm in diameter. High-dose radiotherapy was not associated with increased liver toxicity.

Busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide-busulfan as conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a prospective randomized trial

Busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy) is a frequently used myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Theoretical considerations and pharmacological data indicate that application of busulfan prior to subsequent cyclophosphamide (BuCy) may trigger liver toxicity. Reversing the order of application to cyclophosphamide-busulfan (CyBu) might be preferable, a hypothesis supported by animal data and retrospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to determine impact of order of application of Bu and Cy before allo-HCT in 70 patients with hematological malignancy, 33 patients received BuCy and 37 CyBu for conditioning. In the short term, there were minimal differences in liver toxicity favoring CyBu over BuCy, significant only for alanine amino transferase at day 30 (p = 0.03). With longer follow-up at 4 years, non-relapse mortality (6% versus 27%, p = 0.05) was lower and survival (63% versus 43%, p = 0.06) was higher with CyBu compared to BuCy. Other outcomes, such as engraftment (p = 0.21), acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (p = 0.40; 0.36), and relapse (p = 0.79), were similar in both groups. We prospectively show evidence that the order of application of Cy and Bu in myeloablative conditioning in allo-HCT patients has impact on outcome.

Use of an in vitro\u2013in silico testing strategy to predict inter-species and inter-ethnic human differences in liver toxicity of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids lasiocarpine and riddelliine

Lasiocarpine and riddelliine are pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) known to cause liver toxicity. The aim of this study was to predict the inter-species and inter-ethnic human differences in acute liver toxicity of lasiocarpine and riddelliine using physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling based reverse dosimetry of in vitro toxicity data. The concentration–response curves of in vitro cytotoxicity of lasiocarpine and riddelliine defined in pooled human hepatocytes were translated to in vivo dose–response curves by PBK models developed using kinetic data obtained from incubations with pooled tissue fractions from Chinese and Caucasian individuals, providing PBK models for the average Chinese and average Caucasian, respectively. From the predicted in vivo dose–response curves, the benchmark dose lower and upper confidence limits for 5% effect (BMDL5 and BMDU5) were derived and subsequently compared to those previously obtained in rat to evaluate inter-species differences. The inter-species differences amounted to 2.0-fold for lasiocarpine and 8.2-fold for riddelliine with humans being more sensitive than rats. The inter-ethnic human differences varied 2.0-fold for lasiocarpine and 5.0-fold for riddelliine with the average Caucasian being more sensitive than the average Chinese. In conclusion, the present study provides the proof-of-principle to predict inter-species and inter-ethnic differences in in vivo liver toxicity for PAs by an alternative testing strategy integrating in vitro cytotoxicity data with PBK modelling-based reverse dosimetry.

Sex differences in liver toxicity-do female and male human primary hepatocytes react differently to toxicants in vitro?

There is increasing amount of evidence for sex variation in drug efficiency and toxicity profiles. Women are more susceptible than men to acute liver injury from xenobiotics. In general, this is attributed to sex differences at a physiological level as well as differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, but neither of these can give a sufficient explanation for the diverse responses to xenobiotics. Existing data are mainly based on animal models and limited data exist on in vitro sex differences relevant to humans. To date, male and female human hepatocytes have not yet been compared in terms of their responses to hepatotoxic drugs. We investigated whether sex-specific differences in acute hepatotoxicity can be observed in vitro by comparing hepatotoxic drug effects in male and female primary human hepatocytes. Significant sex-related differences were found for certain parameters and individual drugs, showing an overall higher sensitivity of female primary hepatocytes to hepatotoxicants. Moreover, our work demonstrated that high content screening is feasible with pooled primary human hepatocytes in suspension.

A comparative study between Embosphere(®) and conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of unresectable liver metastasis from GIST.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and/or some unresectable liver metastasis tumors. Hypervascular liver metastatic lesions such as metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are an indication for transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Embosphere(®)-TAE (Embo-TAE) in comparison with conventional TACE (cTACE) for the treatment of liver metastasis from GIST. A total of 45 patients who underwent TACE between Aug 2008 and Feb 2013 were enrolled. Patients with GIST who underwent TAE with Embosphere(®) (n=19) were compared with controls who received cTACE (n=26). The primary end points were treatment response and treatment-related adverse events. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The treatment response of Embo-TAE group was significantly higher than that of the cTACE group (P<0.001). The PFS was significantly better in the Embosphere(®)-group than in the cTACE group (56.6 and 42.1 weeks, respectively; P=0.003). However, there was no statistically significant difference in liver toxicity between the two groups (P>0.05). The median OS in the Embo-TAE group was longer than that in the cTACE group (74.0 weeks, 95% CI: 68.2-79.8 vs. 61.7 weeks, 95% CI: 56.2-67.2 weeks) (unadjusted P=0.045). The use of Embo-TAE significantly reduced the risk of death in patients with GIST with liver metastases according to the Cox proportional hazards regression model [hazard ratio (HR): 0.149; 95% CI: 0.064-0.475]. TAE with Embosphere(®) showed better treatment response and delayed tumor progression compared with cTACE. There was no significant difference in treatment-related hepatic toxicities. Embo-TAE thus appears to be a feasible and promising approach in the treatment of liver metastasis from GIST.

Comparative study between doxorubicin-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. In order to maximize its therapeutic efficacy, doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads have been developed to deliver higher doses of the chemotherapeutic agent and to prolong contact time with the tumor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead (DC bead®) TACE in comparison with conventional TACE (cTACE). A total of 129 patients who underwent TACE between August 2008 and February 2011 were enrolled. We compared HCC patients who underwent TACE with DC bead® (n=60) to controls who received cTACE (n=69). The primary end points were treatment response and treatment-related adverse events. The secondary end point was time to progression. The treatment response in the DC bead® group was significantly higher than that of the cTACE group (p<0.001). The time to progression was significantly better in the DC bead® group than in the cTACE group (11.7 and 7.6months, respectively, p=0.018). Subgroup analysis showed that in intermediate-stage HCC, DC bead® treatment resulted in a significantly better treatment response and longer time to progression than cTACE (p<0.001 and 0.038, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference in liver toxicity between the DC bead® and cTACE group (p>0.05). TACE with DC bead® showed better treatment response and delayed tumor progression compared with cTACE. There was no significant difference in hepatic treatment-related toxicities. DC bead® TACE thus appears to be a feasible and promising approach to the treatment of HCC.

In pursuit of scientific excellence: sex matters

In pursuit of scientific excellence: sex matters

Drug-eluting bead loaded with doxorubicin versus conventional Lipiodol-based transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Lipiodol transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a drug-eluting bead (DEB) has been developed to enhance drug delivery to the tumor and reduce its systemic availability. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial injection of DEB loaded with doxorubicin versus conventional, Lipiodol-based TACE regimens in Asian patients with HCC. The study was designed as a case-control, single-institution clinical trial. Twenty patients with HCC who received DEB loaded with 50 mg doxorubicin ('cases') were matched with 20 patients who had undergone conventional TACE ('controls'). The primary efficacy endpoint was tumor response at 1 month according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The primary safety endpoint was liver toxicity. The rate of objective response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 85% (17 of 20 patients) in the DEB arm versus 30% (six of 20 patients) in the conventional TACE arm (P=0.001). Subgroup analyses conducted in patients with large (>5 cm) or multinodular tumor confirmed significantly higher objective response rates in patients receiving DEB as compared with those treated with conventional TACE (P=0.003 and P=0.005, respectively). At the dose of 50 mg doxorubicin, there was no statistically significant difference in liver toxicity between DEB and conventional TACE (P>0.05). In Asian patients with HCC, transcatheter treatment with DEB loaded with doxorubicin offers a distinct advantage in objective tumor response rate as compared with conventional, Lipiodol-based TACE regimens.

The PPARα-Humanized Mouse: A Model to Investigate Species Differences in Liver Toxicity Mediated by PPARα

To determine the impact of the species difference between rodents and humans in response to peroxisome proliferators (PPs) mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha, PPAR alpha-humanized transgenic mice were generated using a P1 phage artificial chromosome (PAC) genomic clone bred onto a ppar alpha-null mouse background, designated hPPAR alpha PAC. In hPPAR alpha PAC mice, the human PPAR alpha gene is expressed in tissues with high fatty acid catabolism and induced upon fasting, similar to mouse PPAR alpha in wild-type (Wt) mice. Upon treatment with the PP fenofibrate, hPPAR alpha PAC mice exhibited responses similar to Wt mice, including peroxisome proliferation, lowering of serum triglycerides, and induction of PPAR alpha target genes encoding enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism in liver, kidney, and heart, suggesting that human PPAR alpha (hPPAR alpha) functions in the same manner as mouse PPAR alpha in regulating fatty acid metabolism and lowering serum triglycerides. However, in contrast to Wt mice, treatment of hPPAR alpha PAC mice with fenofibrate did not cause significant hepatomegaly and hepatocyte proliferation, thus indicating that the mechanisms by which PPAR alpha affects lipid metabolism are distinct from the hepatocyte proliferation response, the latter of which is only induced by mouse PPAR alpha. In addition, a differential regulation of several genes, including the oncogenic let-7C miRNA by PPs, was observed between Wt and hPPAR alpha PAC mice that may contribute to the inherent difference between mouse and human PPAR alpha in activation of hepatocellular proliferation. The hPPAR alpha PAC mouse model provides an in vivo platform to investigate the species difference mediated by PPAR alpha and an ideal model for human risk assessment PPs exposure.

In vivo dose threshold effect of adenovirus-mediated factor VIII gene therapy in hemophiliac mice.

While much is known about adenovirus biology from its development as a therapeutic gene delivery vehicle, an important question remains regarding the appropriate in vivo vector dose. We describe here an in vivo dose threshold effect with an adenoviral vector expressing human Factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophiliac mice. Upon administration of vector doses between 6 x 10(10) and 2 x 10(10) vector particles per mouse, FVIII was expressed linearly, whereas a dose of 1 x 10(10) vector particles per mouse did not result in detectable levels of FVIII activity. In contrast, in vitro transduction studies demonstrated linear transgene expression over 2 to 3 log units. To further define this dose threshold effect, a vector-mixing study was performed. Mice were injected with a total vector dose of 6 x 10(10) particles containing admixtures of FVIII vector plus a control vector lacking a transgene (null vector). With the admixture, FVIII activity was detected in mice that received 1 3 1010 particles of the FVIII vector, indicating that maintenance of the total viral input at 6 x 10(10) particles per mouse circumvented the threshold dose effect. This threshold dose effect could not be attributed to dose-dependent differences in liver toxicity nor to dose-dependent induction of cellular and humoral immune responses. Southern blot analysis of livers revealed that mice receiving the vector admixture contained FVIII DNA, accounting for the observed FVIII expression, whereas mice receiving 1 x 10(10) particles of FVIII vector had barely detectable FVIII DNA. These results suggest that the threshold effect is an in vivo phenomenon that will have important implications in defining the therapeutic window of adenoviral vectors for clinical applications.