Differences In Ligand Recognition Research Articles

Endogenous ligand recognition and structural transition of a human PTH receptor

Endogenous parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) bind to the parathyroid hormone receptor 1 (PTH1R) and activate the stimulatory G-protein (Gs) signaling pathway. Intriguingly, the two ligands have distinct signaling and physiological properties: PTH evokes prolonged Gs activation, whereas PTHrP evokes transient Gs activation with reduced bone-resorption effects. The distinct molecular actions are ascribed to the differences in ligand recognition and dissociation kinetics. Here, we report cryoelectron microscopic structures of six forms of the human PTH1R-Gs complex in the presence of PTH or PTHrP at resolutions of 2.8 -4.1Å. A comparison of the PTH-bound and PTHrP-bound structures reveals distinct ligand-receptor interactions underlying the ligand affinity and selectivity. Furthermore, five distinct PTH-bound structures, combined with computational analyses, provide insights into the unique and complex process of ligand dissociation from the receptor and shed light on the distinct durations of signaling induced by PTH and PTHrP.

Formyl Peptide Receptors in Mice and Men: Similarities and Differences in Recognition of Conventional Ligands and Modulating Lipopeptides.

The pattern recognition formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) belong to the class of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest group of cell surface receptors involved in a range of physiological processes and pathologies. The FPRs have regulatory function in the initiation as well as resolution of inflammatory reactions, making them highly interesting as targets for drug development. Recent research in the GPCR/FPR fields has uncovered novel receptor biology concepts, including biased signalling/functional selectivity, allosteric modulation, receptor reactivation and receptor cross-talk. When it comes to allosteric modulators, 'tailor-made' lipopeptides (pepducins and lipopeptoids) represent a novel concept of GPCR/FPR regulation. This MiniReview is focused on the basis for recognition of conventional ligands and immunomodulating lipopeptides, novel allosteric modulators for the FPRs, receptors that are highly expressed by both human and mouse neutrophils. The FPRs play key roles in host defence against microbial infections, tissue homeostasis and the initiation as well as resolution of inflammation but there are both similarities and differences in ligand recognition between mice and men. Thus, identification and functional characterization of activating and inhibiting ligands should provide insights into future design of FPR-based animal models of human diseases and development of therapeutics for treating inflammatory diseases.

Sensing Lipids with Mincle: Structure and Function.

Mincle is a C-type lectin receptor that has emerged as an important player in innate immunity through its capacity to recognize a wide range of lipidic species derived from damaged/altered self and foreign microorganisms. Self-ligands include sterols (e.g., cholesterol), and β-glucosylceramides, and the protein SAP130, which is released upon cell death. Foreign lipids comprise those from both microbial pathogens and commensals and include glycerol, glucose and trehalose mycolates, and glycosyl diglycerides. A large effort has focused on structural variation of these ligands to illuminate the structure–activity relationships required for the agonism of signaling though Mincle and has helped identify key differences in ligand recognition between human and rodent Mincle. These studies in turn have helped identify new Mincle ligands, further broadening our understanding of the diversity of organisms and lipidic species recognized by Mincle. Finally, progress toward the development of Mincle agonists as vaccine adjuvants providing humoral and cell-mediated immunity with reduced toxicity is discussed.

Investigation of substrate recognition for cytochrome P450 1A2 mediated by water molecules using docking and molecular dynamics simulations

The role of water molecules in the active site of cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) was investigated using an explicit water model to simulate biological environments. Moreover, differences in ligand recognition between the inhibitor α-naphthoflavone (ANF) and the substrate 7-ethoxyresorufin (7ER) in the CYP1A2 complex were examined. More than 200-ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed for each complex structure of CYP1A2. In the complex structure with 7ER obtained after MD simulation, some water molecules existed in the active site and formed hydrogen bonds between 7ER and some residues. However, in the complex structure with ANF, the hydrogen bond network differed. These results suggest that CYP1A2 requires water molecules in its active site for substrate recognition. The observed differences in the hydrogen bond network in the complex with ANF or 7ER may be due to the fact that ANF is an inhibitor.

Use of DEKOIS 2.0 to gain insights for virtual screening.

With DEKOIS we have created an automated workflow to efficiently generate decoy sets based on a certain number of actives for any target [1]. Physico-chemical similarity should be maximized between decoys and actives in order to yield challenging sets for benchmarking, while exact mimicking of potentially active substructures should be avoided to omit latent actives in the decoy set (LADS). Overall, the diversity of actives and decoys should be maximized to avoid artifacts based on clusters. Applying this philosophy, we have added more details to describe the physicochemical space and applied this protocol to generate sets for targets which had not been accessible before. These DEKOIS 2.0 sets [2] are available online (http://www.dekois.com) for benchmarking and development of new tailor-made scoring functions. Further extension toward additional targets can facilitate a systematic comparison of the virtual screening performance of docking tools and scoring functions in a target dependent way. Based on DEKOIS 2.0, we have investigated strengths and weaknesses of popular docking tools and scoring functions. In addition, we assessed how differences in the setup and preparation can affect the pROC profiles and early enrichment, in particular [3]. For this analysis we have developed an automated protocol to identify and highlight chemotype-specific differences in ligand recognition.

Pregnane X receptor‐ and CYP3A4‐humanized mouse models and their applications

Pregnane X receptor (PXR) is a pivotal nuclear receptor modulating xenobiotic metabolism primarily through its regulation of CYP3A4, the most important enzyme involved in drug metabolism in humans. Due to the marked species differences in ligand recognition by PXR, PXR-humanized (hPXR) mice, and mice expressing human PXR and CYP3A4 (Tg3A4/hPXR) were established. hPXR and Tg3A4/hPXR mice are valuable models for investigating the role of PXR in xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity, in lipid, bile acid and steroid hormone homeostasis, and in the control of inflammation.

Structural Basis for the Receptor Binding Specificity of Norwalk Virus

Noroviruses are positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that cause acute gastroenteritis. They recognize human histo-blood group antigens as receptors in a strain-specific manner. The structures presented here were analyzed in order to elucidate the structural basis for differences in ligand recognition of noroviruses from different genogroups, the prototypic Norwalk virus (NV; GI-1) and VA387 (GII-4), which recognize the same A antigen but differ in that NV is unable to bind to the B antigen. Two forms of the receptor-binding domain of the norovirus coat protein, the P domain and the P polypeptide, that were previously shown to differ in receptor binding and P-particle formation properties were studied. Comparison of the structures of the NV P domain with and without A trisaccharide and the NV P polypeptide revealed no major ligand-induced changes. The 2.3-A cocrystal structure reveals that the A trisaccharide binds to the NV P domain through interactions with the residues Ser377, Asp327, His329, and Ser380 in a mode distinct from that previously reported for the VA387 P-domain-A-trisaccharide complex. Mutational analyses confirm the importance of these residues in NV P-particle binding to native A antigen. The alpha-GalNAc residue unique to the A trisaccharide is buried deeply in the NV binding pocket, unlike in the structures of A and B trisaccharides bound to VA387 P domain, where the alpha-fucose residue forms the most protein contacts. The A-trisaccharide binding mode seen in the NV P domain complex cannot be sterically accommodated in the VA387 P domain.

Characterisation of the zebrafish serotonin transporter functionally links TM10 to the ligand binding site

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants act by inhibiting pre-synaptic reuptake of serotonin (5-HT) leading to elevated synaptic 5-HT concentrations. However, despite extensive efforts little is known about the protein-ligand interactions of serotonin transporter (SERT) and inhibitors. To identify domains and individual amino acids important for ligand binding, we cloned the serotonin transporter from zebrafish, Danio rerio, (drSERT) and compared its pharmacological profile to that of the human serotonin transporter (hSERT) with respect to inhibition of [3H]5-HT uptake and [3H]-escitalopram binding in transiently transfected human embryonic kidney cells; HEK293-MSR. Residues responsible for altered affinities inhibitors were pinpointed by generating cross-species chimeras and subsequent point mutations by site directed mutagenesis. drSERT has a higher affinity towards compounds of the imipramine class, desipramine in particular, exhibiting a 35-fold increased affinity compared to hSERT. drSERT has a 15-30-fold lower affinity towards cocaine and cocaine analogues. The differences in ligand recognition are shown to be primarily caused by interspecies differences in TM10 and were tracked down to three residues (Ala(505), Leu(506) and Ile(507)).

Adenosine Receptors and Angiogenesis

See related article, pages 1130–1138 As originally hypothesized by Berne,1 adenosine is formed in the heart during hypoxia or ischemia and serves as a negative feedback signal to maintain oxygen delivery within a normal physiological range. Adenosine is formed by the metabolism of ATP and transported into the extracellular space by various nucleoside transport proteins.2 In a more localized manner that provides the opportunity for coordinated signaling with the diverse P2 purinoreceptor family that recognizes ATP and ADP, adenosine is also formed from the extracellular metabolism of adenine nucleotides released from stored granules (sympathetic nerves, platelets, mast cells) or through hemichannels (neutrophils, endothelial cells, epithelial cells) by ecto-apyrases and ecto-nucleotidases.3–5 Adenosine signals through activation of widely distributed cell surface G protein–coupled receptors, of which 4 different subtypes have been identified designated A1, A2A, A2B, and A3.6 By activating A2A receptors that are abundantly expressed in coronary vascular smooth muscle, adenosine generated under hypoxic conditions produces potent vasodilation thereby increasing nutrient and oxygen delivery. Although less appreciated, adenosine also serves to maintain tissue oxygenation in response to chronic ischemic/hypoxic stress by increasing the formation of new blood vessels; that is, by stimulating angiogenesis.7,8 Using adenosine receptor agonists or modulators of adenosine metabolism, an important role for adenosine has been established in in vivo models of angiogenesis.7,8 In cell culture systems, adenosine stimulates endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and tube formation,7–11 actions required for the formation of new capillary networks. This action occurs at concentrations of adenosine that are …

A Soluble Form of the First Extracellular Domain of Mouse Type 2β Corticotropin-releasing Factor Receptor Reveals Differential Ligand Specificity

The heptahelical receptors for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), CRFR1 and CRFR2, display different specificities for CRF family ligands: CRF and urocortin I bind to CRFR1 with high affinity, whereas urocortin II and III bind to this receptor with very low affinities. In contrast, all the urocortins bind with high affinities, and CRF binds with lower affinity to CRFR2. The first extracellular domain (ECD1) of CRFR1 is important for ligand recognition. Here, we characterize a bacterially expressed soluble protein, ECD1-CRFR2beta, corresponding to the ECD1 of mouse CRFR2beta. The K(i) values for binding to ECD1-CRFR2beta are: astressin = 10.7 (5.4-21.1) nm, urocortin I = 6.4 (4.7-8.7) nm, urocortin II = 6.9 (5.8-8.3) nm, CRF = 97 (22-430) nm, urocortin III = sauvagine >200 nm. These affinities are similar to those for binding to a chimeric receptor in which the ECD1 of CRFR2beta replaces the ECD of the type 1B activin receptor (ALK4). The ECD1-CRFR2beta possesses a disulfide arrangement identical to that of the ECD1 of CRFR1, namely Cys(45)-Cys(70), Cys(60)-Cys(103), and Cys(84)-Cys(118). As determined by circular dichroism, ECD1-CRFR2beta undergoes conformational changes upon binding astressin. These data reinforce the importance of the ECD1 of CRF receptors for ligand recognition and raise the interesting possibility that different ligands having similar affinity for the full-length receptor may, nevertheless, have different affinities for microdomains of the receptor.

IMP, GTP, and 6-Phosphoryl-IMP Complexes of Recombinant Mouse Muscle Adenylosuccinate Synthetase

Prokaryotes have a single form of adenylosuccinate synthetase that controls the committed step of AMP biosynthesis, but vertebrates have two isozymes of the synthetase. The basic isozyme, which predominates in muscle, participates in the purine nucleotide cycle, has an active site conformation different from that of the Escherichia coli enzyme, and exhibits significant differences in ligand recognition. Crystalline complexes presented here of the recombinant basic isozyme from mouse show the following. GTP alone binds to the active site without inducing a conformational change. IMP in combination with an acetate anion induces major conformational changes and organizes the active site for catalysis. IMP, in the absence of GTP, binds to the GTP pocket of the synthetase. The combination of GTP and IMP results in the formation of a stable complex of 6-phosphoryl-IMP and GDP in the presence or absence of hadacidin. The response of the basic isozyme to GTP alone differs from that of synthetases from plants, and yet the conformation of the mouse basic and E. coli synthetases in their complexes with GDP, 6-phosphoryl-IMP, and hadacidin are nearly identical. Hence, reported differences in ligand recognition among synthetases probably arise from conformational variations observed in partially ligated enzymes.

Recombinant Mouse Muscle Adenylosuccinate Synthetase

Vertebrates possess two isozymes of adenylosuccinate synthetase. The acidic isozyme is similar to the synthetase from bacteria and plants, being involved in the de novo biosynthesis of AMP, whereas the basic isozyme participates in the purine nucleotide cycle. Reported here is the first instance of overexpression and crystal structure determination of a basic isozyme of adenylosuccinate synthetase. The recombinant mouse muscle enzyme purified to homogeneity in milligram quantities exhibits a specific activity comparable with that of the rat muscle enzyme isolated from tissue and K(m) parameters for GTP, IMP, and l-aspartate (12, 45, and 140 microm, respectively) similar to those of the enzyme from Escherichia coli. The mouse muscle and E. coli enzymes have similar polypeptide folds, differing primarily in the conformation of loops, involved in substrate recognition and stabilization of the transition state. Residues 65-68 of the muscle isozyme adopt a conformation not observed in any previous synthetase structure. In its new conformation, segment 65-68 forms intramolecular hydrogen bonds with residues essential for the recognition of IMP and, in fact, sterically excludes IMP from the active site. Observed differences in ligand recognition among adenylosuccinate synthetases may be due in part to conformational variations in the IMP pocket of the ligand-free enzymes.

The Structure of a Human Type III Fcγ Receptor in Complex with Fc

Fcgamma receptors mediate antibody-dependent inflammatory responses and cytotoxicity as well as certain autoimmune dysfunctions. Here we report the crystal structure of a human Fc receptor (FcgammaRIIIB) in complex with an Fc fragment of human IgG1 determined from orthorhombic and hexagonal crystal forms at 3.0- and 3.5-A resolution, respectively. The refined structures from the two crystal forms are nearly identical with no significant discrepancies between the coordinates. Regions of the C-terminal domain of FcgammaRIII, including the BC, C'E, FG loops, and the C' beta-strand, bind asymmetrically to the lower hinge region, residues Leu(234)-Pro(238), of both Fc chains creating a 1:1 receptor-ligand stoichiometry. Minor conformational changes are observed in both the receptor and Fc upon complex formation. Hydrophobic residues, hydrogen bonds, and salt bridges are distributed throughout the receptor.Fc interface. Sequence comparisons of the receptor-ligand interface residues suggest a conserved binding mode common to all members of immunoglobulin-like Fc receptors. Structural comparison between FcgammaRIII.Fc and FcepsilonRI.Fc complexes highlights the differences in ligand recognition between the high and low affinity receptors. Although not in direct contact with the receptor, the carbohydrate attached to the conserved glycosylation residue Asn(297) on Fc may stabilize the conformation of the receptor-binding epitope on Fc. An antibody-FcgammaRIII model suggests two possible ligand-induced receptor aggregations.

The 2.15 Å crystal structure of CG-16, the developmentally regulated homodimeric chicken galectin

Differential developmental regulation of expression, fine-specificity differences in ligand recognition and disparate capacity for homodimerization are characteristics of the two currently known proto-type chicken galectins. The X-ray crystal structure of the first avian galectin, the homodimeric agglutinin from chicken liver (CG-16), has been solved in the absence of ligand in two crystal forms. Although the arrangement of lectin dimers in the two crystals is different, the structure of the monomers and their association into the extended β-sandwich that characterises the dimer are virtually identical. The fold establishes a β-sandwich motif composed of a five-stranded and a six-stranded β-sheet evocative of proto-type mammalian galectins. The carbohydrate-binding site is occupied by six water molecules that take the place of the sugar in the complex. They help to stabilise in the absence of the ligand the spatial arrangement of the amino acid side-chains involved in sugar recognition. Docking of N-acetyllactosamine into the binding site reveals that three of these water molecules, which are in direct contact with the protein, occupy positions equivalent to the key sugar hydroxyl groups, namely the hydroxyls at positions 4 and 6 of the galactose unit and at position 3 of the N-acetylglucosamine unit. Crystallographic data are fully consistent with the binding features in solution previously derived from chemical mapping with deoxy, fluoro and O-methyl derivatives and laser photo-CIDNP (chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarisation) studies. The possible molecular basis for the monomeric character of the chicken intestinal galectin as well as potential mechanisms of oxidative inactivation by disulphide bridging are evaluated on the basis of the given structural information concerning the CG-16 dimer interface and the cysteine residues, respectively.

Multiple Residues Contribute Independently to Differences in Ligand Recognition between Vesicular Monoamine Transporters 1 and 2

The two closely related vesicular monoamine transporters (VMATs) 1 and 2 differ substantially in ligand recognition. The neuronal VMAT2 exhibits a higher affinity for monoamine substrates and in particular for histamine as well as a greater sensitivity to the inhibitor tetrabenazine than the nonneuronal VMAT1. The analysis of chimeric transport proteins has previously shown that two major domains, one spanning transmembrane domains (TMDs) 5-8 (TMD5-8) and the other, TMDs 9-12 (TMD9-12), are required for the high affinity interactions characteristic of VMAT2. Using site-directed mutagenesis to replace residues in TMD5-8 of VMAT2 with the equivalent residues from VMAT1, we now show that the sensitivity of VMAT2 to tetrabenazine requires Ala-315, and this interaction occurs independently of the interaction with residues in TMD9-12. The ability to recognize histamine as a substrate depends on Pro-237, and the contribution of TMD9-12 to histamine recognition appears to involve a common mechanism. In contrast, the replacement of many residues in TMD5-8 of VMAT2 with equivalent residues from VMAT1 improves the recognition of both serotonin and tryptamine, and these mutations show a dominant effect on the recognition of both tryptamine and serotonin over mutations in TMD9-12. The results indicate that different ligands interact through distinct mechanisms with the VMATs and that the recognition of each ligand involves multiple, independent interactions with the transport protein.

Individual Residues Contribute to Multiple Differences in Ligand Recognition between Vesicular Monoamine Transporters 1 and 2

Molecular cloning has identified two vesicular monoamine transporters (VMATs), one expressed in non-neural cells of the periphery (VMAT1) and the other by multiple monoamine cell populations in the brain (VMAT2). Functional analysis has previously shown that VMAT2 has a higher affinity than VMAT1 for monoamine neurotransmitters as well as the inhibitor tetrabenazine. The analysis of chimeric transporters has also identified two major regions required for the high affinity interactions of VMAT2 with these ligands. We have now used site-directed mutagenesis to identify the individual residues responsible for these differences. Focusing on the region that spans transmembrane domains 9 through 12, we have replaced VMAT2 residues with the corresponding residues from VMAT1. Many residues in this region had no effect on the recognition of these ligands, but substitution of Tyr-434 with Phe and Asp-461 with Asn reduced the affinity for tetrabenazine, histamine, and serotonin. Although the ability to affect recognition of multiple ligands suggests a general structural role for these residues, the mutations did not affect dopamine recognition, indicating a more specific role, possibly in recognition of the ring nitrogen that occurs in tetrabenazine, histamine, and serotonin but not dopamine. The mutation K446Q reduced the affinity of VMAT2 for tetrabenazine and serotonin but not histamine, whereas F464Y reduced serotonin affinity and perhaps histamine recognition but not tetrabenazine sensitivity, providing more evidence for specificity. Interestingly, the Vmax of both VMATs for dopamine exceeded that for serotonin by 3-5-fold, indicating a difference in the speed of packaging of these two neurotransmitters. We also found that VMAT1 has a higher affinity for tryptamine than VMAT2. This mutually exclusive interaction with serotonin and tryptamine also suggests a physiological rationale for the existence of two VMATs. Surprisingly, the residue responsible for this difference, Tyr-434, also accounts for the higher affinity interaction of VMAT2 with tetrabenazine, histamine, and serotonin. Interestingly, replacement of Tyr-434 with alanine increases the affinity of VMAT2 for both serotonin and dopamine and reduces the rate of dopamine transport.

Identification of Critical Determinants of α1-Adrenergic Receptor Subtype Selective Agonist Binding

alpha 1-Adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes mediate many effects of the sympathetic nervous system. The three cloned subtypes (alpha 1a-AR, alpha 1b-AR, alpha 1d-AR), although structurally similar, bind a series of ligands with different relative potencies. This is particularly true for the alpha 1a-AR, which recognizes a number of agonists and antagonists with 5-50-fold higher affinity than the alpha 1b- or alpha 1d- subtypes. Since ligands bind to receptor-residues that are located in the transmembrane spanning domains, we hypothesize that subtype differences in ligand recognition are due to differences in the binding properties of nonconserved transmembrane residues. Using site-directed mutagenesis, selected putative ligand-binding residues in the alpha 1b-AR were converted, either individually or in combination, to the corresponding residues in the alpha 1a-AR. Mutation of two such residues (of approximately 172 amino acids in the transmembrane domains) converted the agonist binding profile entirely to that of the alpha 1a-AR. Over 80% of this conversion was due to an Ala204-->Val substitution; the remainder was due to the additional substitution of Leu314-->Met. To confirm that Ala204 and Leu314 are indeed critical for agonist subtype-selectivity, the equivalent residues in the alpha 1a-AR (Val185 and Met293) were reversed of that of the alpha 1b-AR. Correspondingly, the agonist-binding profile of this double alpha 1a-AR mutant reverted to that of the alpha 1b-AR. From these data, in conjunction with macromolecular modeling of the ligand-binding pocket, a model has been developed, which indicates that the determinants of these two residues for agonist subtype-selectivity are due not only to interactions between their side chains and specific ligand moieties but also to a critical interaction between these two amino acids.

A1 adenosine receptors. Two amino acids are responsible for species differences in ligand recognition.

Species differences in ligand binding to A1 adenosine receptors were localized to the seventh transmembrane (TM7) region based on the binding of [8-3H]cyclopentyl-1, 3-dipropylxanthine and three other ligands to wild type and six bovine/canine interspecies receptor chimeras expressed in COS-1 cells. Subsequent site-directed mutagenesis experiments identified amino acid 270 (isoleucine/methionine, bovine/canine) as being primarily responsible for species differences in the binding of N6-adenine-substituted compounds, R-N6-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) and (S)-N6-endonorbornan-2-yl-9-methyladenine, and the C-8-substituted xanthine, [3H]cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the N6 region of adenines and the C-8-region of xanthines bind to the same region of the receptor. A second TM7 amino acid, 277 (serine/threonine, bovine/canine), selectively influences the binding of the ribose-substituted adenosine analog, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine to a variable extent, depending on the nature of amino acid 270. We hypothesize that amino acid 270 of the A1 receptor interacts with the N6 region of adenosine, while amino acid 277 is important, especially in the absence of an N6 substitution, for interactions with a distinct nucleoside region, possibly on the ribose.

Identification of structurally distinct alpha 2-adrenergic receptors.

Recent studies involving a variety of membrane receptors and ion channels indicate that diversity exists among these proteins as evidenced by tissue-specific and developmentally related expression of different isoforms. Alpha 2-Adrenergic receptors, plasma membrane proteins involved in sympathetic neurotransmission, may similarly represent a nonhomogeneous class of binding sites based on the following observations. First, their activation can elicit a wide variety of effector cell responses, which are apparently triggered by at least three different signal transduction mechanisms. Second, alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in various tissues and species exhibit marked differences in their ligand recognition properties. To determine if heterogeneity of the receptor protein itself is involved in generating this diversity, we structurally characterized the alpha 2-adrenergic receptor in two tissues that exhibit the greatest differences in ligand recognition properties, neonatal rat lung and human platelet. We report here that these differences in ligand recognition are maintained after partial receptor purification (50-100-fold) and are associated with distinct differences in the physical and structural properties of the receptor protein. The human platelet and neonatal rat lung receptor differ in the apparent molecular weight of their hormone-binding subunits (human platelet, Mr approximately 64,000 versus neonatal rat lung, Mr approximately 44,000) as well as in the number or type of their associated oligosaccharide moieties. The observed diversity is consistent with expression of isoforms of the alpha 2-adrenergic receptor and suggests the presence of more than one gene encoding similar but distinct receptor proteins.