Differences In Colorectal Cancer Screening Research Articles

Rural-Urban Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survivorship Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rural residents have a higher prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality compared to urban individuals. Policies have been aimed at improving access to CRC screening to reduce these outcomes. However, little attention has been paid to other determinants of CRC-related outcomes, such as stage at diagnosis, treatment, or survivorship care. The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate literature describing differences in CRC screening, stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship care between rural and urban individuals. We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases using a combination of MeSH and free-text search terms related to CRC screening, stage at diagnosis, treatment, survivorship care, and rurality. We identified 921 studies, of which 39 were included. We assessed methodological quality using the ROBINS-E tool and summarized findings descriptively. A meta-analysis was performed of studies evaluating CRC screening using a random-effects model. Seventeen studies reported disparities between urban and rural populations in CRC screening, 12 on treatment disparities, and 8 on staging disparities. We found that rural individuals were significantly less likely to report any type of screening at any time period (pooled odds ratio = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.76-0.86). Results were inconclusive for disparities in staging at diagnosis and treatment. One study reported a lower likelihood of use of CRC survivorship care for rural individuals compared to urban individuals. There remains an urgent need to evaluate and address CRC disparities in rural areas. Investigators should focus future work on assessing the quality of staging at diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship care in rural areas.

Abstract C117: Implementing on overdue colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) primary care setting: 12-month post intervention results

Abstract PURPOSE: We partnered with the largest FQHC in New Haven, CT to address overdue colorectal cancer screening with evidence-based interventions (EBI). We report on the 12-month follow up of a cohort of 3,127 patients overdue for CRC screening who received 1 or more evidence based interventions (EBIs) in October, 2021. BACKGROUND: Sociocultural and medical concerns are barriers to colonoscopy uptake contributing to disparities in CRC screening. An additional barrier is system level capacity. COVID-19 associated delays exacerbated the existing backlog of individuals overdue for CRC screening, underscoring the need to expand Fecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) screening capacity. At the time of the study, colonoscopy was the front-line cancer screening strategy in this and other primary care settings in this region. METHODS: We tested the unique and additive value of multiple EBIs for increasing CRC screening in this low-income urban population. The EBIs included: medical reminder to all recipients (Arms 1-4), supplemented with information to address social determinants of health [SDOH]) barriers (Arm 2), offer of assistance from trained community health workers (CHW) to address SDOH barriers (Arm 3), and offer of educational intervention (video and pre- and post- survey) (Arm 4). Twelve-month outcomes include: 1) CRC screening test ordered; 2) CRC screening completed. RESULTS: Of the 3,127 randomized patients, ages 50-75, 77% were Hispanic (33%) or Black (44%). At 12 months post-intervention, 1,692 (54.1%) of the cohort received an order for CRC screening, and 541 (17.3%) of the cohort completed screening. With no path to CRC screening other than a provider order, among patients for whom CRC screening was ordered, nearly one-third (32%) completed screening within 12 months of the intervention. There were no differences in either outcome based on intervention Arm. DISCUSSION: Among the 3,127 individuals who were due or overdue for screening at the time of intervention, only 9 had documented CRC cancer screening in the 5 years before randomization. The promotion of stool-based testing may have brought individuals into CRC screening. There were no differences in CRC screening (colonoscopy or FIT) orders or completed tests across the 4 arms of the study, suggesting that the provider endorsed mailed screening reminder with information on in-home, stool-based testing option (FIT), and notice that CRC screening is now recommended beginning at age 45 was key to behavior change. Provider engagement and post-pandemic care-seeking on part of patients, as well as increased awareness of CRC screening following the death of high-profile actor at age 43 likely contributed to increased uptake of CRC screening. SUMMARY: A mailed reminder is a cost effective, scalable intervention that may be effective in safety net primary care settings that serve high-risk individuals. Closing the screening gap in CRC screening should include educating patients about their CRC screening options as well as the change in recommended age to begin CRC screening. Citation Format: Beth A. Jones, Sakinah C. Suttiratana, Sarah A. DeGiovanni, Levita Robinson, Michael Couturie, Steven J. Parra, Louie M. Gangcuangco, Laney Zhang, Denise Stevens, Margarita Vargas-Torres. Implementing on overdue colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) primary care setting: 12-month post intervention results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C117.

Health literacy and gender differences in colorectal cancer screening

Abstract Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the major causes of death worldwide. Previous research reported differences in screening adherence both by gender and socioeconomic determinants. However, little is known about the extent to which Health Literacy (HL) may affect gender differences in CRC screening rates. Here, we aimed to assess HL levels in both genders and their relations with CRC screening adherence. Methods The study was performed within the Tuscan population sample selected in the Italian Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (PASSI - Progress by local health units toward a healthier Italy) in 2017-2019. Socioeconomic status was measured by education level, occupation, financial status, and nationality, while HL by the Italian version of the 6-items European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q6). Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate associations between CRC screening rates, social determinants, and HL. Results Among 4,268 people aged 50-69 years included in PASSI, 64% undergo to CRC screening in the 2 years preceding the interview. No statistically significant differences in screening adherence were found by gender. In the multivariate analysis, the odds of adherence to CRC screening increased in both genders for being aged 60-69 years (Males: OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.82; Females: OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.37-2.14) and high education level (Males: OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.66; Females: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60). Males with a poor financial status and females with a low HL level were less likely to undergo CRC screening (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.88 and OR 0.68 95% CI 0.49-0.95 respectively). Conclusions Our findings suggest that adherence to CRC screening is associated with HL in females only, while it depends on financial status in males. Therefore, gender specific interventions, tailored on different factors, are needed to increase the CRC screening rates. Key messages

Racism Is a Modifiable Risk Factor: Relationships Among Race, Ethnicity, and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes

Racism Is a Modifiable Risk Factor: Relationships Among Race, Ethnicity, and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes

Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer incidence are widely documented. There are two potential mechanisms for these disparities: differences in access to screening, including screening follow-up, and differences in underlying risk of colorectal cancer. We reviewed the literature for evidence of these two mechanisms. We show that higher colorectal cancer incidence in blacks relative to whites emerged only after the dissemination of screening and describe evidence of racial disparities in screening rates. In contrast to the strong evidence for differences in colorectal cancer screening utilization, there is limited evidence for racial differences in adenoma prevalence. In general, black and white patients who are screened have similar adenoma prevalence, though there is some evidence that advanced adenomas and adenomas in the proximal colon are somewhat more likely in black than white patients. We conclude that higher rates of colorectal cancer incidence among black patients are primarily driven by lower rates of colorectal cancer screening. Our findings highlight the need to increase black patients' access to quality screening to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Abstract C108: Sociodemographic determinants of colorectal cancer screening completion among women adherent to mammography screening guidelines

Abstract Background Several initiatives have focused on increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates, but national rates still fall below 70% for many groups, particularly those in underserved communities. Examining CRC screening determinants in groups who have completed screening for other cancer sites may provide useful information to support future initiatives. In 2015, 71.6% of women nationally completed mammograms in the past two years, while only 63% completed any CRC screening procedures. Purpose We examined data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey to identify determinants of CRC screening completion among women adherent to breast cancer (BrCa) screening guidelines. We hypothesized that race, income, and psychosocial factors would explain CRC screening non-adherence. Methods The sample contained women (N=1206), aged 50-74 years, BrCa free, who completed a mammogram in the past two years, and were of average CRC risk (no first degree relative with cancer, history of polyps or inflammatory bowel disease). Bivariate associations between sociodemographic, health access, perceived BrCa risk, perceived CRC risk variables, and CRC screening status were examined using chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with CRC screening completion. Results Prevalence of CRC screening in this sample was 55.52% including: Sigmoidoscopy (1.47%), colonoscopy (50.33%), fecal occult blood test (10.81%). Significant differences in CRC screening (p <.01) by education, income, insurance, foreign birth status, and language regularly spoken were revealed. Having insurance (OR:4.52, CI:2.20-9.31) and being foreign-born (OR: 1.77, CI:1.17-2.66) were independently associated with CRC screening completion after controlling for all other factors. Conclusion CRC screening rates among women completing breast cancer screening were lower than the national average for women. Neither perceived BrCa risk nor perceived CRC risk explained CRC screening behavior. Income and health insurance variables appear to drive sociodemographic differences in screening completion. However, foreign-born status had a direct impact on CRC screening behavior. Differences in the availability of free or low-cost screening programs for BrCa and CRC may explain these findings. More research is needed to understand how sociodemographic factors interact to impact CRC screening rates in this group. Citation Format: Deeonna E Farr, Leslie E Cofie, Alison T Brenner, Ronny A Bell, Daniel S Reuland. Sociodemographic determinants of colorectal cancer screening completion among women adherent to mammography screening guidelines [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr C108.

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Access to Healthcare in New York City Taxi Drivers.

This study examined differences in colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic, migration, occupational, and health-related factors in a sample of male taxi drivers. Male drivers eligible for colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) (≥ 50years old) were recruited in 55 community-based health fairs conducted during November 2015 to February 2017 in 16 taxi garages or community locations located in Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan and Bronx. Participants completed a survey that included sociodemographic, migration, occupational, health-related, and cancer screening practices. For this study 33 questions were analyzed. The sample consisted of 137 male drivers, 27% of them had undergone CRCS. Occupation-related factors, including night shifts and driving high numbers of weekly hours, were associated with lower CRCS rates; having a family history of cancer, health insurance, a regular source of primary care, and a routine check-up in the last year, were associated with higher CRCS rates. The findings suggest that drivers with health insurance and better access to primary care are more likely to be up-to-date with CRCS. The results provide important information that can inform occupation-based public health interventions.

Conducting a randomized trial in rural and urban safety-net health centers: Added value of community-based participatory research.

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in the US. Despite evidence that screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality, screening rates are sub-optimal with disparities by race/ethnicity, income, and geography. Rural-urban differences in CRC screening are understudied even though approximately one-fifth of the US population lives in rural areas. This focus on urban populations limits the generalizability and dissemination potential of screening interventions.MethodsUsing community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles, we designed a cluster-randomized trial, adaptable to a range of settings, including rural and urban health centers. We enrolled 483 participants across 11 health centers representing 2 separate networks. Both networks serve medically-underserved communities; however one is primarily rural and one primarily urban.ResultsOur goal in this analysis is to describe baseline characteristics of participants and examine setting-level differences. CBPR was a critical for recruiting networks to the trial. Patient respondents were predominately female (61.3%), African-American (66.5%), and earned <$1200 per month (87.1%). The rural network sample was older; more likely to be female, white, disabled or retired, and have a higher income, but fewer years of education.ConclusionsVariation in the samples partly reflects the CBPR process and partly reflects inherent differences in the communities. This confirmed the importance of using CBPR when planning for eventual dissemination, as it enhanced our ability to work within diverse settings. These baseline findings indicate that using a uniform approach to implementing a trial or intervention across diverse settings might not be effective or efficient.

Abstract B25: Black-white differences in colorectal cancer screening and incidence over time by age and sex

Abstract Introduction: Blacks have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) burden of any racial/ethnic group and the underlying reason for this disparity has not been fully elucidated. Continued examination of incidence in relation to screening, which is recommended for men and women beginning at age 50 years, may provide valuable insights into these disparities. The present study examined black-white differences in CRC incidence and screening patterns by age and sex over time. Methods: National Health Interview Surveys between 2000-2015 were used to estimate screening prevalence and prevalence ratios (PR) among adults 50 years and older by non-Hispanic white/black race and sex. Data from the SEER were used to estimate age-sex-specific incidence rates from 1992-2013. Results: From 2000 to 2015, CRC screening prevalence in age 50 years and older increased by 69% in whites (from 39.4% to 66.5%) and by 98% in blacks (from 31.1% to 61.4%) on a relative scale. Increases in CRC screening were evident in both men and women. During this time period, black-white differences also narrowed, such that CRC screening in blacks was 19% lower than in whites in 2000 (PR=0.81, 95%CI 0.71,0.92) but only 6% lower in 2015 (PR=0.94, 95%CI 0.88, 1.00). Absolute black-white differences in CRC incidence rates were slightly larger for men than for women (men: 3.0-6.0 versus women: 2.8-5.4 per 100,000) in people 35-49 years old, but decreased overtime in both groups. In 50-79-year-olds, absolute black-white incidence differences were larger for men prior to 2003 (men: 19.8-28.9 versus women: 28.3-33.1 per 100,000) and during 2004-2013 (men: 27.7-53.3 versus women: 20.6-38.7 per 100,000). In 35-49-year-olds, black-white incidence rate ratios (IRR) decreased overtime from 1992-2000 to 2009-2013 in both men (1.47 to 1.19) and women (1.49 to 1.17), but increased in both men (1.06 to 1.38) and women (1.15 to 1.49) for those 50 years and older. Conclusions: Black-white differences in CRC incidence in both absolute and relative terms are greatest in screening-eligible adults and have persisted in recent years whereas absolute differences in incidence in those younger than 50 are relatively small. These patterns may reflect racial gaps in screening uptake. However, disparities in CRC screening prevalence have narrowed in recent years and may portend convergence in CRC incidence rates. Note: This abstract was not presented at the conference. Citation Format: Stacey A. Fedewa, Douglas Corley, Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Michael Goodman, Chyke Doubeni. Black-white differences in colorectal cancer screening and incidence over time by age and sex. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer: From Initiation to Outcomes; 2016 Sep 17-20; Tampa, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B25.

Temporal Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening among Asian Americans.

Asian Americans (AA) are less likely to be screened for colorectal cancer compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), with a widening disparity for some AA subgroups in the early 2000s. Whether these patterns have continued in more recent years is unknown. We examined temporal trends in colorectal cancer screening among AA overall compared with NHWs and by AA subgroup (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Filipino, South Asian, Vietnamese) using data from the 2003, 2005, 2007, and 2009 California Health Interview Surveys. Unadjusted (PR) and adjusted (aPR) prevalence ratios for colorectal cancer screening, accounting for sociodemographic, health care, and acculturation factors, were calculated for respondents ages 50 to 75 years (NHW n = 60,125; AA n = 6,630). Between 2003 and 2009, colorectal cancer screening prevalence increased from 43.3% to 64.6% in AA (P ≤ 0.001) and from 58.1% to 71.4% in NHW (P ≤ 0.001). Unadjusted colorectal cancer screening was significantly lower among AA compared with NHW in 2003 [PR = 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-0.82], 2005 (PR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84), 2007 (PR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96), and 2009 (PR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), though disparities narrowed over time. After adjustment, there were no significant differences in colorectal cancer screening between the two groups, except in 2003. In subgroup analyses, between 2003 and 2009, colorectal cancer screening significantly increased by 22% in Japanese, 56% in Chinese, 47% in Filipino, and 94% in Koreans. In our study of California residents, colorectal cancer screening disparities between AA and NHW narrowed, but were not eliminated and screening prevalence among AA remains below nationwide goals, including the Healthy People 2020 goal of increasing colorectal cancer screening prevalence to 70.5%. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(6); 995-1000. ©2016 AACR.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems.

Racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and diagnostic testing present challenges to CRC prevention programs. Thus, it is important to understand how differences in CRC screening approaches between healthcare systems are associated with racial/ethnic disparities. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 50-75 years who were members of the Population-based Research Optimizing Screening Through Personalized Regimens cohort from 2010 to 2012. Data on race/ethnicity, CRC screening, and diagnostic testing came from medical records. Data collection occurred in 2014 and analysis in 2015. Logistic regression models were used to calculate AORs and 95% CIs comparing completion of CRC screening between racial/ethnic groups. Analyses were stratified by healthcare system to assess differences between systems. There were 1,746,714 participants across four healthcare systems. Compared with non-Hispanic whites (whites), odds of completing CRC screening were lower for non-Hispanic blacks (blacks) in healthcare systems with high screening rates (AOR=0.86, 95% CI=0.84, 0.88) but similar between blacks and whites in systems with lower screening rates (AOR=1.01, 95% CI=0.93, 1.09). Compared with whites, American Indian/Alaskan Natives had lower odds of completing CRC screening across all healthcare systems (AOR=0.76, 95% CI=0.72, 0.81). Hispanics had similar odds of CRC screening (AOR=0.99, 95% CI=0.98, 1.00) and Asian/Pacific Islanders had higher odds of CRC screening (AOR=1.16, 95% CI=1.15, 1.18) versus whites. Racial/ethnic differences in CRC screening vary across healthcare systems, particularly for blacks, and may be more pronounced in systems with intensive CRC screening approaches.

Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening in Central Italy

Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening in Central Italy

Longitudinal Rates of Colon Cancer Screening Use in Winnipeg, Canada: The Experience of a Universal Health-Care System with an Organized Colon Screening Program.

OBJECTIVES:We examined trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (fecal occult blood test (FOBT), colonoscopy, and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS)) and differences in CRC screening by income in a population with an organized CRC screening program and universal health-care coverage.METHODS:Individuals who had an FOBT, colonoscopy, or FS were identified from the provincial Physician Claims database and the population-based colon cancer screening registry. Trends in age-standardized rates were determined. Logistic regression was performed to explore the association between CRC screening and income quintiles by year.RESULTS:Up-to-date CRC screening (FOBT, colonoscopy, or FS) increased over time for men and women, all age groups, and all income quintiles. Up-to-date CRC screening was very high among 65- to 69- and 70- to 74-year-olds (70% and 73%, respectively). There was a shift toward the use of an FOBT for CRC screening for individuals in the lower income quintiles. The disparity in colonoscopy/FS coverage by income quintile was greater in 2012 than in 1995. Overall, there was no reduction in disparities by income in up-to-date CRC screening nor did the rate of increase in up-to-date CRC screening or FOBT use change after the introduction of the organized provincial CRC screening program.CONCLUSIONS:CRC screening is increasing over time for both men and women and all age groups. However, a disparity in up-to-date CRC screening by income persisted even with an organized CRC screening program in a universal health-care setting.

Sex-based Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening

Research suggests that recurrence and survival from colorectal cancer are worse in men than in women but the causes for this are unclear. Our aims were to (1) assess for sex differences in colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) within a large, contemporary population-based sample in California; and (2) examine the impact of income, education, and insurance status on sex differences in CRCS. Screening-eligible patients were identified from the 2007 US California Health Interview Survey. Up-to-date, CRCS was defined as fecal occult blood test within 1 year, flexible sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, or colonoscopy within 10 years. Logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the relationship between sex and CRCS. Stratified analyses on the basis of self-reported income (low vs. high), education (≤ high school vs. > high school), and health insurance status (insured vs. uninsured) were performed to determine if sex differences in screening were modified by these parameters. In total, 11,260 men and 17,705 women were identified: mean ages were 65 and 66 years, respectively, and 63% were white in both the sexes. In the entire cohort, only two thirds of men and women reported undergoing up-to-date CRCS. Women had decreased odds of CRCS than men, after adjusting for potential confounders. Stratified analyses indicated that sex disparities in CRCS persisted among the insured, educated, and high-income earners. Women are less likely to undergo CRCS than men, but poor health care access is associated with low CRCS in both the sexes. Conventional strategies aimed at improving health care access should also include sex-specific interventions that raise awareness about preventive care to most effectively optimize CRCS.

Ethnic differences and predictors of colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen, and mammography screening participation in the multiethnic cohort

PurposeGiven the relation between screening and improved cancer outcomes and the persistence of ethnic disparities in cancer mortality, we explored ethnic differences in colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and mammography screening in the Multiethnic Cohort Study. MethodsLogistic regression was applied to examine the influence of ethnicity as well as demographics, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, family history of cancer, and previous screening history on self-reported screening participation collected in 1999–2002. ResultsThe analysis included 140,398 participants who identified as white, African American, Native Hawaiian, Japanese American, US born-Latino, or Mexican born-Latino. The screening prevalences overall were mammography: 88% of women, PSA: 45% of men, and colonoscopy: 35% of men and women. All minority groups reported 10–40% lower screening utilization than whites, but Mexican-born Latinos and Native Hawaiian were lowest. Men were nearly twice as likely to have a colonoscopy (OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.89–1.99) as women. A personal screening history, presence of comorbidities, and family history of cancer predicted higher screening utilization across modalities, but to different degrees across ethnic groups. ConclusionsThis study confirms previously reported sex differences in colorectal cancer screening and ethnic disparities in screening participation. The findings suggest it may be useful to include personal screening history and family history of cancer into counseling patients about screening participation.

Online Narratives and Peer Support for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Delivering personal narratives and peer support for CRC screening in an online weight-loss community could be an efficient approach to engaging individuals at increased risk, because obesity is associated with excess colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and lower screening rates.Evaluate user engagement and impact of narratives and peer support for promoting CRC screening in an online weight-loss community.Pilot randomized trial.Members of an online weight-loss community who were not up-to-date with CRC screening were enrolled in the study in 2011.Basic and Enhanced groups (n=153 each) both received education. The Enhanced group also received narratives and peer support for CRC screening in online forums.The main measures were user engagement, psychosocial outcomes, and self-report CRC screening at 6 months. Analyses were conducted with (1) the full sample of participants and (2) a minimum dose sample of those who participated in their assigned intervention to a minimum degree. Analyses were completed in 2012.Participants were mostly female (92%) with a mean age of 56 years. More than 90% in both groups viewed the educational information. Only 57% in the Enhanced group joined the online team. The Enhanced group had greater improvement in motivation for screening than the Basic group at 1 month (p=0.03). In the full sample, there was no difference in CRC screening at 6 months (Enhanced 19% vs Basic 16%, adjusted OR=1.33, 95% CI=0.73, 2.42). In the minimum dose sample, fecal occult blood testing was higher in the Enhanced (14%) vs Basic (7%) group (adjusted OR=2.49, 95% CI=1.01, 6.17).Although no between-group differences in CRC screening were seen at 6 months, this study did demonstrate that it is feasible to deploy a narrative and peer support intervention for CRC screening in a randomized trial among members of an online community. However, modifications are needed to improve user engagement.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01411826.

Impact of Asian Ethnicity on Colorectal Cancer Screening

Although research shows that African Americans and Hispanics frequently receive less colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) than whites, few studies have focused on CRCS among Asians. The aims of this study were to compare CRCS between Asians and whites and to evaluate for clinical predictors of CRCS. From the 2007 California Health Interview Survey, we identified all Asian and white respondents who were eligible for CRCS. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate for differences in CRCS. We used stratified and interaction analyses to examine whether associations between race and CRCS were modified by insurance status, birthplace, or language skills, while controlling for other confounders. Baseline characteristics were similar between Asians and whites. Only 58% of Asians and 66% of whites reported undergoing up-to-date CRCS (P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, visiting a physician more than 5 times produced the highest odds of being up-to-date with screening. When compared with whites, Asians had decreased odds of being up-to-date with screening. Stratified analyses showed that this disparity existed mainly in the insured, but not in the uninsured, and it was not modified by place of birth or English language proficiency. Despite its ability to reduce mortality, CRCS is suboptimal in our US population-based cohort of Asians when compared with whites. A contributing factor to this problem for the Chinese and Koreans may be a lack of awareness regarding CRCS, whereas the source of the problem in the Vietnamese seems to be related to healthcare access.

Regional, Racial, and Gender Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Middle-aged African-Americans and Whites

African-Americans have higher incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer than non-African-Americans. Early detection with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces untimely death because the test can detect abnormalities and precancerous polyps in the colon and rectum. However, African-Americans aged 50 and older continue to have low CRC screening adherence. A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey to examine trends in self-reported CRC screening by geographic region, race, and gender. African-Americans, particularly men, were less likely to have been screened for colon cancer compared to all races and genders in this study. Individuals in the south were more likely to receive CRC screening than other regions. Colon cancer education and interventions are needed among low-adherent groups to promote the benefits of early detection with CRC screening.

Contribution of screening and survival differences to racial disparities in colorectal cancer rates.

Considerable disparities exist in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates between blacks and whites in the United States. We estimated how much of these disparities could be explained by differences in CRC screening and stage-specific relative CRC survival. We used the MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model to estimate CRC incidence and mortality rates in blacks, aged 50 years and older, from 1975 to 2007 assuming they had: (i) the same trends in screening rates as whites instead of observed screening rates (incidence and mortality); (ii) the same trends in stage-specific relative CRC survival rates as whites instead of observed (mortality only); and (iii) a combination of both. The racial disparities in CRC incidence and mortality rates attributable to differences in screening and/or stage-specific relative CRC survival were then calculated by comparing rates from these scenarios to the observed black rates. Differences in screening accounted for 42% of disparity in CRC incidence and 19% of disparity in CRC mortality between blacks and whites. Thirty-six percent of the disparity in CRC mortality could be attributed to differences in stage-specific relative CRC survival. Together screening and survival explained a little more than 50% of the disparity in CRC mortality between blacks and whites. Differences in screening and relative CRC survival are responsible for a considerable proportion of the observed disparities in CRC incidence and mortality rates between blacks and whites. Enabling blacks to achieve equal access to care as whites could substantially reduce the racial disparities in CRC burden.

Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Screening in New Mexico Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) among Hispanics in the state of New Mexico has increased in the past decade while that among whites has declined significantly. Using the 2006 New Mexico Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, we compared CRC screening among Hispanics and whites by gender to examine the influence of demographic, socioeconomic, preventive health, and clinical measures on the utilization of CRC screening. Although we found no ethnic differences in the prevalence of current breast, cervical and cancer screening, Hispanics were less likely to be current with CRC screening than whites. These differences were observed across a range of socioeconomic and other explanatory measures and in both genders. Hispanics also had a higher prevalence of CRC-related risk factors than whites, including inactivity, obesity, and diabetes, and ranked lower for most socioeconomic measures. Adjusting for healthcare coverage, education, and income in logistic regression models eliminated the Hispanic-white differences in CRC screening among men, and substantially reduced but did not eliminate screening differences among women. Innovative methods are needed to reach Hispanics to raise awareness of and participation in CRC screening. Because many CRC risk factors are potentially modifiable, appropriate cultural and linguistic interventions tailored to specific Hispanic subgroups and aimed at promoting CRC screening and reducing CRC risk factors may decrease ethnic disparities in CRC incidence.