Differences In Amino Acid Digestibility Research Articles

Nutritional values of soybean meal from different sources in multiparous sows

This study determined the available energy content, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients, and ileal amino acid (AA) digestibility of soybean meal (SBM) from different sources in non-gestating, non-lactating sows. In Exp. 1, 24 multiparous Landrace × Yorkshire (LY) sows (parity 3–5) were allotted to a replicated 12 × 3 Youden square design consisting of 12 diets and 3 periods. The 12 diets included 11 test diets containing SBM from different sources and a corn-based diet. Each period included a 5-d adaptation and a 5-d total fecal and urine collection. In Exp. 2, 8 multiparous LY sows (parity 3–5) were allotted to a replicated 4 × 3 Youden square design with 4 diets and 3 periods. The 4 diets included a nitrogen-free diet and 3 SBM diets (3 representative SBM samples were selected from Exp. 1). Our results showed that the coefficient of variation of ether extract, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber levels in 11 SBM samples were > 20%. There were no differences in digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and the ATTD of gross energy, nitrogen, and neutral detergent fiber values between different SBM samples (P > 0.05). Additionally, no differences in AA digestibility were identified among the 3 representative SBM samples (P > 0.05). In conclusion, there were no differences in DE, ME, and AA digestibility between different SBM samples fed to multiparous non-gestating sows. When formulating diets for sows, it is important to consider the differences in the nutritional value of SBM at different physiological stages.

An Accurate Estimate of the Amino Acid Content of Human Milk Collected from Chinese Women Adjusted for Differences in Amino Acid Digestibility

BackgroundThe amino acid (AA) composition of human milk is used to define the AA requirements of the infant. Thus, it is important that estimates of composition be as complete and accurate as possible. When determining AA composition using standard hydrolysis methods, some AAs are progressively destroyed while others are incompletely released. For accuracy, AA composition needs to be determined using multiple hydrolysis times. The true ileal digestibility of AAs also needs to be taken into consideration. ObjectiveThe objective was to bring together AA compositional (determined using multiple hydrolysis intervals) and digestibility data determined using the piglet to give an estimate of the absorbed AA profile of human milk with reference in particular to Asian females. MethodsMature milk was collected from Chinese females. AA analysis using multiple hydrolysis intervals and a nonlinear regression model was used to accurately estimate AA composition. Human milk, as well as a protein-free diet, were fed to piglets (n = 6), and ileal digesta were collected (piglet age, 21 d) to determine the true ileal AA digestibility of AAs in human milk. ResultsTrue ileal AA digestibility coefficients ranged from (mean ± standard error of the mean) 0.61 ± 0.081 for tyrosine to 1.01 ± 0.030 for tryptophan, with a digestibility for total nitrogen of 0.90 ± 0.013. Convergence criteria were met for the modeling for each AA, and the model had a level of significance of P < 0.0001 for each AA. The amount of available AAs (total AA content as per the model prediction multiplied by the true ileal AA digestibility coefficient determined in the piglet) are reported. ConclusionsAn estimate of the absorbed AA profile of mature milk collected from Chinese females is provided. For the first time, data is presented for cysteine.

Standardized amino acid digestibility and nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy of frozen raw, freeze-dried raw, fresh, and extruded dog foods using precision-fed cecectomized and conventional rooster assays.

Processing conditions, particularly temperature and duration of heating, impact pet food digestibility. Various commercial pet food formats are now available, but few have been tested thoroughly. The objective of this study was to determine the amino acid (AA) digestibilities and nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy (TMEn) values of frozen raw, freeze-dried raw, fresh (mildly cooked), and extruded dog foods using the precision-fed cecectomized and conventional rooster assays. The diets tested were Chicken and Barley Recipe [Hill's Science Diet, extruded diet (EXT)], Chicken and White Rice Recipe [Just Food for Dogs, fresh diet (FRSH)], Chicken Formula [Primal Pet Foods, frozen raw diet (FRZN)], Chicken and Sorghum Hybrid Freeze-dried Formula [Primal Pet Foods, hybrid freeze-dried raw diet (HFD)], and Chicken Dinner Patties [Stella & Chewy's, freeze-dried raw diet (FD)]. Two precision-fed rooster assays utilizing Single Comb White Leghorn roosters were conducted. Cecectomized roosters (n = 4/treatment) and conventional roosters (n = 4/treatment) were used to determine standardized AA digestibilities and TMEn, respectively. All roosters were crop intubated with 12 g of test diet and 12 g of corn, with excreta collected for 48 h. In general, FD had the highest, while EXT had the lowest AA digestibilities; however, all diets performed relatively well and few differences in AA digestibility were detected among the diets. Lysine digestibility was higher (P < 0.05) in FD and FRZN than EXT, with other diets being intermediate. Threonine digestibility was higher (P < 0.05) in FD than EXT, with other diets being intermediate. Digestibilities of the other indispensable AA were not different among diets. The reactive lysine:total lysine ratios were 0.94, 0.96, 0.93, 0.93, and 0.95 for EXT, FRSH, FRZN, HFD, and FD, respectively. TMEn was higher (P < 0.05) in FRZN than FD, FRSH, and EXT, higher (P < 0.05) in HFD than FRSH and EXT, and higher (P < 0.05) in FD than EXT. In conclusion, our results support the notion that AA digestibilities are affected by diet processing, with FD, HFD, FRZN, and FRSH diets having higher AA digestibility coefficients and greater TMEn values, than the EXT diet; however, other factors such as ingredient inclusion and macronutrient composition may also have affected these results. More research in dogs is necessary to test the effects of format on diet palatability, digestibility, stool quality, and other physiologically relevant outcomes.

Differences in Amino Acid Digestibility and Protein Quality Among Various Protein Isolates and Concentrates Derived from Cereal Grains, Plant and Dairy Proteins

Abstract Objectives The objectives of this research were to use the growing pig as a model to determine the amino acid (AA) digestibility and protein quality by the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) for brown rice concentrate (BRPC), pea protein concentrate (PPC), two rapeseed protein isolates (RSP-1 and RSP-2), soy protein isolate (SPI), and whey protein isolate (WPI). Methods Seven ileal cannulated barrows (36.5 ± 1.6 kg) were randomly allotted to a 7 × 7 Latin square design with 7 diets and seven 7-d periods, with ileal digesta collected on d 6 and 7. Each protein ingredient was included in a diet as the only AA containing source, and a nitrogen-free diet was used to measure basal endogenous losses of AA. The DIAAS were calculated for children from 6 months to 3 years and for persons &amp;gt; 3 years according to the Food and Agriculture Organization. Data were analyzed using the PROC MIXED of SAS in a completely randomized design with the pig as the experimental unit. Results The standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of Arg, His, Ile, Leu, and Phe was greater (P &amp;lt; 0.05) for WPI compared with the other proteins, and the SID of Thr and Trp did not differ among WPI, SPI, and RSP-2. The SID of all indispensable AA (IAA), expect Arg and Lys, was greater (P &amp;lt; 0.05) for RSP-2 than for PPC and BRPC, and PPC and BRPC had a greater (P &amp;lt; 0.05) SID of most IAA, expect His, Lys, and Met, than RSP-1. For DIAAS, RSP-2 had a DIAAS greater than 100 for children 6 months to 3 years, whereas, for persons &amp;gt; 3 years, RSP-2 and WPI had DIAAS greater than 100, i.e., 110 and 117, respectively. For both reference patterns, the DIAAS for RSP-2 and WPI was greater (P &amp;lt; 0.05) than for SPI, and the DIAAS for RSP-1 was less (P &amp;lt; 0.05) than the DIAAS for SPI but greater (P &amp;lt; 0.05) than for PPC, and PPC had a DIAAS greater (P &amp;lt; 0.05) than BRPC. Conclusions Results of this research illustrate that WPI is an excellent dairy protein for persons &amp;gt;3 years, and RSP-2 is an excellent quality plant protein for children from 6 months to 3 years and persons &amp;gt;3 years. In contrast, protein concentrates from cereal grains and some plant proteins, i.e., BRPC and PPC, respectively, are lower quality proteins, but soy based plant protein isolates, i.e., SPI, may be considered good quality proteins for children from 6 months to 3 years and persons &amp;gt;3 years. Funding Sources DSM animal nutrition and health.

Variability of amino acid digestibility of lupin and pea grains in caecectomised laying hens

ABSTRACT 1. The objective of this study was to investigate the variations in amino acid (AA) digestibility of lupin and pea grains in caecectomised laying hens. The relationship between AA digestibility and chemical constituents of the grains was determined. 2. Twelve variants of lupins and peas were each added to a basal diet at a concentration of 300 g/kg, at the expense of maize starch. The lupin and pea variants were separately investigated in two subsequent trials. Each trial consisted of two 7 × 7 Latin squares, each comprising the basal diet and six diets with lupins or peas. 3. Fourteen caecectomised laying hens (LSL-classic) were individually housed in metabolism cages and 120 g/d of experimental diets were provided for eight days. During the last four days, excreta were collected quantitatively and feed intake was recorded. A regression approach was used to determine the AA digestibility of the lupin and pea variants. 4. Amino acid digestibility of the lupins and peas was high, although significant differences in AA digestibility among the lupins and peas were detected. The digestibility of lysine was in the range of 0.87–0.91 and 0.87–0.93 for lupins and peas, respectively. The digestibility of methionine in lupins and peas varied between 0.80–0.88 and 0.72–0.90. Variations in AA digestibility in peas were more pronounced than in lupins. 5. Significant correlations between chemical constituents of lupins, such as alkaloids, and AA digestibility were detected in some cases, without a consistent pattern. In peas, tannin concentration and the insoluble protein fraction were negatively correlated with digestibility of some AAs, but only when one colour flower variant was considered. Trypsin inhibitor activity in peas was negatively correlated with AA digestibility, particularly for the white flower variants.

Evaluation of the pepsin digestibility assay for predicting amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meals

Sixteen meat and bone meal (MBM) samples were obtained and selected from various company plants to provide a wide range in pepsin nitrogen digestibility values. Pepsin digestibility was determined using either 0.02 or 0.002% pepsin. Amino acid (AA) digestibility of the 16 MBM samples was then determined using a precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay. The 0.02% pepsin digestibility values were numerically higher than the 0.002% pepsin values. The values varied from 77 to 93% for 0.02% pepsin and from 67 to 91% for 0.002% pepsin. The rooster AA digestibility results showed a wide range of values among MBM samples mostly due to the 4 samples having lowest and highest AA digestibility. A precision-fed broiler chick ileal AA digestibility assay confirmed that there were large differences in AA digestibility among the MBM samples having the lowest and highest rooster digestibility values. Correlation analyses between pepsin and AA digestibility values showed that the correlation values (r) were highly significant (P < 0.0001) for all AA when all 16 MBM samples were included in the analysis. However, when the MBM samples with the 2 lowest and the 2 highest rooster digestibility values were not included in the correlation analyses, the correlation coefficient values (r) were generally very low and not significant (P > 0.05). The results indicated that the pepsin nitrogen digestibility assay is only useful for detecting large differences in AA digestibility among MBM. There also was no advantage for using 0.02 versus 0.002% pepsin.

Comparison of amino acid digestibility of feedstuffs determined with the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay and the standardized ileal amino acid digestibility assay

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare amino acid digestibility of several feedstuffs using 2 commonly accepted methods: the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay (PFR) and the standardized ileal amino acid assay (SIAAD). Six corn, 6 corn distillers dried grains with or without solubles (DDGS/DDG), one wet distillers grains, one condensed solubles, 2 meat and bone meal (MBM) and a poultry byproduct meal were evaluated. Due to insufficient amounts, the wet distillers grains and condensed solubles were only evaluated in roosters. Standardized amino acid digestibility varied among the feed ingredients and among samples of the same ingredient for both methods. For corn, there were generally no differences in amino acid digestibility between the 2 methods. When differences did occur, there was no consistent pattern among the individual amino acids and methods. Standardized amino acid digestibility was not different between the 2 methods for 4 of the DDG samples; however, the PFR yielded higher digestibility values for a high protein DDG and a conventionally processed DDGS. The PFR yielded higher amino acid digestibility values than the SIAAD for several amino acids in 1 MBM and the poultry byproduct meal, but it yielded lower digestibility values for the other MBM. Overall, there were no consistent differences between methods for amino acid digestibility values. In conclusion, the PFR and SIAAD methods are acceptable for determining amino acid digestibility. However, these procedures do not always yield similar results for all feedstuffs evaluated. Thus, further studies are needed to understand the underlying causes in this variability.

Standardized Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility of Plant Feedstuffs in Broiler Chickens and Turkey Poults Using a Nitrogen-Free or Casein Diet

The standardized ileal amino acid digestibility (SIAAD) of 5 plant-based ingredients was determined in 5- and 21-d-old broiler chicks and turkey poults. Two diets (N-free diet, NFD, and a highly digestible protein diet 10% casein, HDP) were fed to determine ileal endogenous amino acid flow, and each was used for endogenous amino acid correction for the plant-based ingredients. The plant-based ingredients evaluated were 2 samples of corn distillers dried grains with solubles (light and dark DDGS), canola meal, corn, and soybean meal. Each diet was fed for 5 d to 6 replicate cages containing 30 or 8 birds, which were sampled on d 5 or 21, respectively. For chicks, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility increased with age for all the feed ingredients. After standardization, SIAAD increased with age when chicks were fed DDGS and corn, but not soybean meal or canola meal. For all the feed ingredients evaluated, SIAAD values for both methods of standardization were not different at d 5. However, the HDP method resulted in greater SIAAD values for most of the amino acids in light DDGS, canola meal, and corn (d 21). In poults, the apparent ileal amino acid digestibility values increased with age for all the feed ingredients except the dark DDGS and canola meal. After standardization, there was no effect of age on amino acid digestibility in all the feed ingredients evaluated, with the exception of corn. Within a particular age (d 5 or 21), both methods of standardization resulted in similar amino acid digestibility values except for corn, for which the SIAAD values were greater (NFD method) in 11 amino acids. Results from this study showed that age-appropriate endogenous amino acid standardization is necessary and, in some cases, results in no age-associated differences in amino acid digestibility. With the exception of corn, standardization of amino acid digestibility with ileal endogenous amino acid flow from birds fed an NFD or HDP did not differ for most plant feedstuffs.

Comparison of Amino Acid Digestibility Determined Prececally or Based on Total Excretion of Cecectomized Laying Hens

This study investigated the possibility of using cecectomized laying hens for the determination of amino acid (AA) digestibility of protein sources as an alternative to measurements made at the terminal ileum. Toasted soybeans and corn gluten meal were used as test protein sources. A low-protein basal diet was based mainly on corn, wheat gluten, and cornstarch. In 4 other diets toasted soybeans or corn gluten meal were included each at 15% or 30% at the expense of cornstarch, so that the changes in the AA concentrations of the diets resulted from the protein sources only. Titanium dioxide was used as the indigestible marker. In experiment 1, two hundred ten 18-wk-old pullets were used. Digesta from the posterior 2-thirds of the intestine between Meckel's diverticulum and 2 cm anterior to the ileo-ceca-colonic junction was obtained from killed hens. In experiment 2, fourteen cecectomized hens were used. They were kept individually, and excreta were quantitatively collected. The apparent digestibility of AA was calculated for each diet. Linear regression analysis was used to calculate AA digestibility for the 2 protein sources. Across all diets, apparent AA digestibility was significantly higher in experiment 2 than in experiment 1. However, AA digestibilities of the 2 protein sources were not different between both experiments. Differences in AA digestibility between the protein sources were not significant in experiment 1, but in experiment 2 significant differences between the protein sources were detected for some AA due to a lower standard error of estimate. It was concluded that AA digestibility of protein sources for laying hens can be evaluated based on quantitative excreta collection with cecectomized hens using the regression approach. This needs fewer animals than the determination of digestibility at the terminal ileum. Differences between protein sources are easier to detect because of the lower standard error of estimate.

The laboratory rat as a model animal for determining ileal amino acid digestibility in meat and bone meal for the growing pig

The use of the laboratory rat as a model animal to allow the determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in the growing pig using the slaughter method, was evaluated. Sixteen male rats and 16 male pigs were fed diets containing as the sole protein source one of two meat and bone meals which were expected to differ in quality. Chromic oxide was included in the diets as an indigestible marker. Ileal contents from the terminal 20 cm of ileum were collected after slaughter of the rats and pigs, 4 and 9 h from the start of feeding, respectively. The latter sampling times were shown to be optimal for each species. Interspecies comparisons made under defined conditions indicated close agreement between rats and pigs for the apparent ileal digestibility of nitrogen (N) and most of the amino acids for each of the two meat and bone meals. Mean apparent ileal N digestibility coefficients for the rat and pig respectively were 0.64 and 0.66, and 0.73 and 0.73 for the two meat and bone meal based diets. A significant ( P <0.05) interspecies difference in apparent digestibility was found only for glutamic acid, where the pig had a lower apparent ileal digestibility. There were no significant differences in amino acid digestibility when correction was made for the endogenous ileal amino acid component. It was concluded that the growing rat is a satisfactory model for the growing pig, for determining ileal amino acid digestibility in meat and bone meal. The measurement of digestibility at the terminal ileum indicated differences in amino acid digestibility between the two meat and bone meals. However, the faecal approach which generated significantly higher digestibility coefficients than the ileal method, did not allow these differences to be detected.

Amino acid ileal digestibility of some grain legume seeds in growing chickens

AbstractThe apparent and true amino acid (AA) digestibility from soya-bean meal (SBM), vetch meal (VM), field pea meal (FPM) and bitter vetch meal (BVM) were determined in the lower ileum of growing chickens force-fed on semisynthetic diets (120 g crude protein and 13·1 MJ metabolizable energy per kg dry matter) based on each meal as the sole source of protein. The average apparent and true digestibility values were 0·82, 0·73, 0·76 and 0·60 and 0·90, 0·91, 0·87 and 0·74 for diets SBM, VM, FPM and BVM, respectively. Marked differences in AA digestibility among diets were found. The apparent digestibility of methionine, the most limiting essential AA in poultry diets, was significantly higher in diet SBM than in diets FPM and BVM (P&lt; 0·05). It is concluded that the seeds of vetch and field pea may be suitable for inclusion in poultry diets as partial substitutes for soya bean. The use of bitter vetch is not recommended.