Difference In Remission Rates Research Articles

Treatment of Patients with IgA Nephropathy: Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil.

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), characterized by aberrant IgA immune complex deposition, is the most prevalent primary glomerular disease and the main cause of end-stage renal disease, causing a significant physical and psychological burden on people worldwide. Conventional therapeutic approaches, such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and corticosteroids, may not achieve sufficient effectiveness and may produce major side events in the past. The previous data in Asian populations indicated that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might significantly advance the development of a new therapy strategy for IgAN. The effectiveness and safety of MMF in patients with IgAN will be investigated in this study. A literature search was conducted on June 30th, 2023, by searching the following databases: PubMed and the Cochrane Library according to predefined criteria. To investigate the renoprotective benefits and safety of MMF, statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's Review Manager Version 5.3. The meta-analysis included nine randomized controlled studies that fulfilled the inclusion criterion. In the Asian population, the results revealed a substantial difference in remission rates between the MMF group and the control group (OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.02, 6.30, P = 0.05). MMF can increase the rate of decrease in proteinuria in IgAN patients when compared with controls in Asians (OR: 7.34, 95% CI: 2.69, 20.08, P = 0.0001), and MMF can reduce the urinary protein in patients with IgAN in Asians (WMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -1.15, -0.08, P = 0.02). Interestingly, these studies on Asians were conducted in China. However, the differences in remission rate, rate of decrease in proteinuria, and urinary protein reduction between the MMF group and control group were not found in overall populations and in the Caucasian population. The differences in complete remission rate, partial remission rate, serum creatinine (SCr) doubling rate, rate of 50% increase in SCr, and rate of need for renal replacement treatment between the MMF group and control group were not found in Asians, Caucasians, and overall populations. The difference in the rate of side effects between the MMF group and the control group was not found. MMF protects renal function and is a safe medication for treating Chinese IgAN patients. MMF might significantly advance the development of a new therapy strategy for IgAN in the Chinese population</p>.

#992 Protocol based on PLA2R1 epitope recognition is superior to standard protocol in achieving remission in PLA2R1-associated membranous nephropathy

Abstract Background and Aims Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a rare, but severe autoimmune disease affecting kidney glomeruli. Clinical evolution is variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to persistent nephrotic syndrome and kidney failure. The major autoantigen in MN is PLA2R1 protein associated with 50-70% of all cases. Patients may present antibodies against a single immunodominant CysR domain or may develop additional antibodies against CTLD1 and/or CTLD7 and/or CTLD8 domains of PLA2R1 defining a cascade immunization or epitope spreading. The mechanism of epitope spreading has been described in a variety of contexts: it can reinforce immune response to eliminate a pathogen, but can also be associated with the aggravation of autoantibody-mediated autoimmune pathologies. The value of this marker in the management of MN patients remains debated. Our initial study (confirmed on an independent cohort) has shown that the single domain recognition (non-spreader patients) is associated with a higher chance of spontaneous remission (45% vs 0.05% in GEMRITUX cohort) and a better response to treatment (100% of remission regardless of the dose of rituximab used). The patients with multi domain recognition (spreader patients) of CTLD1 and/or CTLD7 domains, on the other hand, have poor prognosis and are less likely to achieve remission requiring high doses of rituximab. Based on these studies we have proposed a personalized treatment protocol with either low or high dose Rituximab based on patients’ PLA2R1 epitope spreading status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this personalized treatment in comparison to the established GEMRITUX protocol. Method A multicenter, randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was conducted in 12 French hospitals. Sixty-four consecutive patients with PLA2R1-related MN were randomly assigned to either the control group following the GEMRITUX protocol (symptomatic treatment for 6 months, two 375 mg/m2 rituximab infusions at month-6 in case of persistent nephrotic syndrome (NS)) or the personalized treatment (PMMN) group (patients with no epitope spreading at month-0 were treated as per GEMRITUX protocol, while patients with epitope spreading at month-0 or month-6 with persistent NS were treated immediately with two 1 g rituximab infusions). The primary study outcome was the rate of clinical remission at month-12. The secondary outcomes were complete and partial remission, immunological remission, proteinuria, albuminuria, serum creatinine, and PLA2R1 antibody titer. Results From 64 patients included, three were excluded from final analyses due to loss to follow-up. There was no difference in age, gender, albumin, UPCR, anti-PLA2R1 titer and the rate of PLA2R1 epitope spreading at baseline between the two groups. At M12, 34% of patients from the GEMRITUX group and 69% of patients from PMMN group achieved partial clinical remission (P = .0105) defined as UPCR &amp;lt; 3.5 g/g with a decrease greater than 50% from baseline; improvement or normalization of serum albumin; and increase of serum creatinine lower than 20%. While there was no difference in remission rate between the GEMRITUX group and PMMN group for patients with single domain recognition (38% vs 50%, respectively, P = .7107), multi-domain recognizers (spreaders) were more likely to achieve remission with personalized protocol (36% vs. 87%, P = .0078). The rate of complete clinical remission between the two experimental groups, defined as UPCR &amp;lt;0.3 g/g and normal albumin, was close to statistical significance (0% vs 16%, P = .0538). Conclusion Personalized treatment protocol based on the stratification of patients with PLA2R1-related MN according to their epitope spreading status, is superior to the standard GEMRITUX protocol in achieving partial clinical remission at 12 months. Patients with multiple domain recognition should be treated immediately with high doses of rituximab to increase their chances of remission.

#1093 Remission rates and long-term outcomes of relapsed idiopathic nephrotic syndrome children treated with cyclophosphamide vs. cyclosporin A

Abstract Background and Aims Approximately seventy percent of nephrotic syndrome (NS) children experience relapse episodes which are classified as frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS), steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In such cases, immunosuppressive drugs are combined to reduce the steroid side effects and prolong the remission period. However, the benefit of immunosuppressants and their side effects should be balanced. Objectives This study aimed to determine the remission rates and long-term outcomes of FRNS, SDNS, and SRNS children treated with cyclophosphamide vs. cyclosporin A (Cy A). Methods A retrospective review of medical records of children (aged &amp;lt; 15 years) with relapsed idiopathic nephrotic syndrome at Prince of Songkla University Hospital, southern Thailand during 2010-2021 was conducted. Demographic data, treatment responses, and adverse events were recorded. The remission rates, incidences of infection and acute kidney injury (AKI) in FRNS/SDNS and SRNS were compared between oral cyclophosphamide and Cy A treatments. Results There were 148 relapsed NS children, 102 (68.9%) boys, with a median age of 4.6 (IQR 2.5-8.4) years. FRNS, SDNS, and SRNS accounted for 37 (25.0%), 50 (33.8%), and 61 (41.2%) children, respectively. The cyclophosphamide treatment group (N = 135) had significantly higher remission rates in FRNS/SDNS than SRNS (63/85 (74.1%) vs. 11/50 (22.0%), P &amp;lt; 0.001), while the difference in remission rates in the Cy A treatment group (N = 53) was not statistically significant between FRNS/SDNS and SRNS (14/20 (70.0%) vs. 18/33 (54.5%), P = 0.265). Patients who had the Cy A treatment had significantly higher proportions of infections and AKI than children in the cyclophosphamide treatment group (20/53 (37.7%) vs 10/95 (10.5%), P &amp;lt; 0.001 and 21/53 (39.6%) vs 9/95 (9.5%), P &amp;lt; 0.001, respectively). Of the 148 children, at a median follow-up time of 8.7 (IQR 5.2–12.2) years, 21 (14.2%) and 9 (6.1%) children had developed chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage III or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), respectively. The mean duration from CKD stage III to ESKD was 5.0+5.5 months. Conclusions Seventy percent of FRNS/SDNS children achieved remission with either Cy A or cyclophosphamide, but the SRNS children achieved remission proportionately better with Cy A than cyclophosphamide. However, the Cy A-treated children had higher proportions of infections and AKI than the cyclophosphamide treatment group. Overall, one-fifth of the relapsed childhood NS children developed CKD.

Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression or major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To report the first and largest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) or major depressive disorder(MDD). We conducted a systematic literature retrieval via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane until April 2023 for RCT, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching for patients with TRD or MDD. Outcomes measured were changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), response and remission rate, and serious adverse events. Five RCTs, including 4480 patients, were included for meta-analysis. Among them, two RCTs were rated as "high risk" in three aspects (allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel and blinding of outcome assessment) because of the non-blind method, and the quality evaluation of the remaining works of literature was "low risk". Augmentation treatment with Aripiprazole (A-ARI) was associated with a significant higher response rate compared with augmentation treatment with bupropion (A-BUP) (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25; P = 0.0007; I2 = 23%). Besides, A-ARI had a significant higher remission rate compared with switching to bupropion (S-BUP) (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49; P = 0.05; I2 = 59%) and A-BUP had a significant higher remission rate compared with S-BUP (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.36; P = 0.0004; I2 = 0%). In addition, there was no significant difference in remission rate(RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.17; P = 0.42; I2 = 33%), improvement of MADRS(WMD: -2.07; 95% CI: -5.84, 1.70; P = 0.28; I2 = 70%) between A-ARI and A-BUP. No significant difference was observed in adverse events and serious adverse events among the three treatment strategies. A-ARI may be a better comprehensive antidepressant treatment strategy than A-BUP or S-BUP for patients with TRD or MDD. More large-scale, multi-center, double-blind RCTs are needed to further evaluated the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching treatment strategies.

Comparative effectiveness of tofacitinib and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: a prospective observational study.

To assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study used data from a single academic referral hospital's registries of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the disease activity score (DAS)28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders. This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFi) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, p = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.720-2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to JAKi and bDMARD, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFi (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033-3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events (AEs) but similar rates of serious AEs (SAEs) to TNFi. In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of AEs compared with TNFi, while the occurrence of SAEs was comparable between the groups. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02602704.

P514 Beyond the First Attempt: A Multi-Centre UK Analysis of Second JAK Inhibitor Use in Ulcerative Colitis

Abstract Background Tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib are Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) effective in inducing and maintaining remission in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Limited data exists regarding outcomes in patients on a second JAKi after prior JAKi treatment failure. Here we describe the effectiveness of induction with a second JAKi in a cohort of UC patients. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, UC patients from 20 UK hospitals treated with a second JAKi were included. Clinical endpoints, as defined in Table 1, were assessed at week 8. Corticosteroid use, prior advanced therapies, and reason for cessation of first JAKi were documented. Results 99 patients commenced induction therapy with a second JAKi, 87% of whom had active disease by disease activity index, endoscopy or biomarkers. First JAKi was stopped due to failure or intolerance in 95% of cases. Tofacitinib was the most commonly used first JAKi (72%). Second JAKi was upadacitnib in 77% and filgotinib in 23%. There was no significant difference in the SCCAI (p=0.834) or pMayo (p=0.074) at baseline in those given either drug. Exposure to at least one other advanced therapy was seen in 78 patients, and 49 patients required steroids during induction. Both the median SCCAI and pMayo scores improved from 7 (SCCAI 5-9, pMayo 5-8) at baseline to 2 (SCCAI 0-3) and 1 (pMayo 0-3) at 8 weeks (p&amp;lt;0.001). Paired endoscopy results were available in 27 patients, showing an overall improvement from a median UCEIS 5 (5-6) and MES 2 (2-3) to 1.5 (0-5) and 1 (1-2.5) respectively (UCEIS p&amp;lt;0.001, MES p=0.019). Median faecal calprotectin reduced from 650 (331-1500) to 62 (31-173) in 45 patients (p&amp;lt;0.001) (figure 1B). Of the 82 patients with paired disease activity index at baseline and 8 weeks, 52% achieved clinical remission (figure 1A) of whom 93% (40/43) were in steroid-free remission, 64% (9/14) in endoscopic remission and 88% (22/25) in biochemical remission. There was no significant difference in remission rates depending on disease extent, number of previous advanced therapies, first or second JAKi, or reason for cessation of first JAKi including primary non-response (p=0.99). Serious adverse events were admission for IV steroids, colectomy and VTE (1 each), withdrawal due to adverse event n=1, zoster infections n=3. Conclusion on Our results suggest that treatment with filgotinib or upadacitinib following exposure to another JAKi can be effective in inducing clinical remission in UC. Efficacy was similar in our cohort regardless of mechanism of failure of the first JAKi or whether upadacitinib or filgotinib was used as a second JAKi. The observed safety profile was as expected especially with considerable risk of zoster infections.

Efficacy and suitability of adding short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) to pharmacotherapy in patients with depressive disorders: a systematic review.

Recent guidelines on depressive disorders suggest a combination of antidepressants and psychotherapy in case of moderate to severe symptomatology. While cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy are the most investigated interventions, psychodynamic psychotherapies have been less explored. The aim of this paper is to systematically review literature data on the efficacy of shortterm psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in combination with antidepressants in the treatment of depressive disorders, focusing both on short and on long-term results and on potential moderators that could influence its effectiveness. The systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched were PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, from inception to August 2023. Adding STPP to medications in the first six months of treatment didn't influence remission rates, but improved acceptability, work adjustment, interpersonal relationships, social role functioning, hospitalization rates and cost-effectiveness. After 12 months, a significant difference in remission rates arised, favouring combined therapy. In a long-term perspective, adding STPP to pharmacotherapy reduced the recurrence rate by almost 50%. STPP has proven to be more effective in longer depressive episodes, in more severe depressions and in patients with a childhood abuse history. Instead, STPP had no impact on major depressive disorder with comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Combining STPP with antidepressants appeared to be helpful both in a short-term and in a long-term perspective. Still, there are few rigorous studies with large samples and further research is needed to identify which subgroups of patients may benefit more from STPP.

In dogs with chronic enteropathy (idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease) is budesonide more effective than prednisolone or prednisone in resolving clinical signs?

PICO Question In dogs with chronic enteropathy (idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease) is budesonide more effective than prednisolone or prednisone in resolving clinical signs or improving the canine inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity index (CIBDAI) or the canine chronic enteropathy clinical activity index (CCECAI)? Clinical bottom line Category of research Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed One double-blinded randomised control trial. Strength of evidence Moderate. Outcomes reported The outcome of this study identified that no significant differences in remission rates (&gt; 75% decrease in CIBDAI scores) were observed between the prednisone and budesonide groups. Frequency of adverse effects were also similar between the two groups. Conclusion A single study with moderate power of evidence alongside some significant limitations, particularly population size, cannot be used as the sole provider of an answer to the PICO question. As such, further studies with greater power would be required before a definitive assessment of comparative treatment efficacy can be made. How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.

Compared to Venetoclax Plus Hypomethylating Agents, High Dose Cytarabine Based Intensive Chemotherapy Induction for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Leads to a Faster Remission Resulting in Better Survival

Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax is a commonly used induction regimen for newly diagnosed AML patients who are not eligible for standard intensive chemotherapy (IC). Due to the high remission rates and the easier administration of Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents in the outpatient settings and community practices, some patients receive such induction even if IC eligible. We retrospectively analyzed 206 newly diagnosed AML patients, age 56-80 years who received either Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (n=65) or high dose cytarabine based IC ( n=141) to assess the difference in remission rates, time to achieve remission and the impact of time to achieving remission on survival endpoints. Patients who received IC ( FLAG or CLAG +/- Idarubicin) were younger ( median age 66 (56,79) vs 73(56,79) years, p&amp;lt;0.001) but had similar race distribution, NCCN cytogenetics risk and distribution of primary versus secondary leukemia compared to patients with hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax. Patients who received IC has similar chance of achieving CR (89% vs 71%, p=0.89) and transplant rate compared to venetoclax/hypomethylating agents. Patients who received IC had better DFS (p=0.026), a trend towards better OS (p=0.06) and similar relapse risk (p=0.69) compared to venetoclax/hypomethylating agents (figure 1). In a logistic regression analysis, patients who received IC and patients with favorable/intermediate risk AML had higher likelihood of achieving CR in the first 60 days post induction ( HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.19-4.61; P=0.01 for IC versus Venetoclax/hypometh; and HR 0.24 , 95% CI 0.12-0.49, P&amp;lt;0.001 for NCCN adverse versus favorable/intermediate risk AML). A cox model for survival endpoints where age was factored into three equal size groups (56-63, 64-70 and 71-79) and NCCN risk fitted as strata, was performed on survival endpoints. Achieving CR1 within 60 days of induction treatment had significant impact on overall survival (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.46, p&amp;lt;0.001). Our data shows that among patients aged 55-80 years with newly diagnosed AML, receiving high dose cytarabine based IC have similar rates but more likely to achieve CR within 60 days than venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents. Achieving CR within 60 days of induction is a predictor of better overall survival. Based on our analysis, high dose cytarabine based IC should remain the preferred choice for patients eligible for such treatment.

Comparative Effectiveness of Reinduction Approaches for Pediatric Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction: Intensive frontline chemotherapy achieves initial remission rates above 80% in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML), however, approximately half of patients relapse, and overall survival (OS) after relapse is poor. There is a paucity of comparative effectiveness data on salvage regimens to inform selection of optimal post-relapse therapy. The objective of this analysis was to compare outcomes following relapse by prevalent reinduction regimens in a multi-center real-world dataset. Methods: Patients 18 years and younger who had received frontline chemotherapy for AML between 2011-2019 at 12 pediatric institutions were eligible for inclusion. Trained personnel completed manual chart abstraction to obtain demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome information. The analysis included patients who achieved morphologic remission and then experienced disease relapse; patients with primary refractory AML and those who pursued palliative therapy only after relapse were excluded. Prevalent reinduction regimens were classified as (1) intensive without anthracycline [e.g. fludarabine/cytarabine and high-dose cytarabine-containing regimens], (2) intensive with anthracycline (e.g. CPX-351, mitoxantrone/cytarabine and cytarabine/daunorubicin/etoposide), and (3) non-intensive (including azacytidine or decitabine-based regimens). Primary outcomes were OS after relapse and end reinduction disease response defined by morphologic remission (&amp;lt;5% blasts) and measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission (&amp;lt;0.1% blasts). Covariate distributions were compared by reinduction regimen using chi-square tests. Survival analyses used Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable cox proportional hazards models. End induction response was evaluated using logistic regression. Adjustment was made for covariates found to both differ by reinduction regimen and be associated with outcome, regardless of statistical significance. Results: Of 530 patients, 157 (29.6%) experienced a relapse at a median of 9.7 months (IQR 6.5-16.3) after initial diagnosis. Median post-relapse follow-up was 2.2 years (IQR 1.1-3.2). One- and 2-year OS rates from relapse were 44.9 ± 4.1% and 38.6 ± 4.1%, respectively. Of 157 patients with relapse, 129 from 9 institutions had available information on post-relapse treatment and pursued reinduction with curative intent. Patients were 48.8% female, 27.1% Hispanic, 14.7% non-Hispanic Black and had a median age of 7.1 years (IQR 2.70-14.2) at relapse. Most patients (89.2%) relapsed after completion of frontline therapy, and 24% had undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first clinical remission. Reinduction regimens were as follows: 79 (61.2%) received intensive reinduction without anthracycline, 34 (26.4%) received intensive reinduction with anthracycline and 16 (12.4%) received non-intensive reinduction. Patients with a non-intensive reinduction were more likely to have relapsed within one year of initial diagnosis (50% versus 34%, p = 0.23) and undergone transplant prior to relapse (75.0% versus 16.8%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Covariates were balanced across intensive induction regimens. One-year OS was 50.3 ± 4.6%, with 63 (40.1%) achieving morphologic remission and 40 (31.0%) achieving an MRD-negativity after first reinduction cycle. Seventy-three patients (56.9%) underwent HCT after relapse; 11 (15.1%) received a second transplant. OS curves and adjusted outcome comparisons by reinduction regimen are shown in the Figure and Table. One-year OS was 51.1 ± 5.8%, 60.2 ± 9.0% and 26.7 ± 11.4% for intensive therapy without anthracycline, with anthracycline and non-intensive, respectively. However, after adjustment hazard ratios (HRs) were not statistically significant [HR = 0.85 (p = 0.65) and 1.77 (p = 0.23) for intensive with anthracycline and non-intensive, compared to non-intensive without anthracycline, respectively]. Conclusions: After controlling for patient, disease and treatment characteristics, we did not identify a significant difference in remission rates or OS by reinduction approaches for pediatric relapsed AML. Although anthracycline-based reinduction did not improve OS, adjusted point estimates suggest that anthracyclines may improve end reinduction disease response. Ongoing cohort expansion will enable comparative effectiveness analyses of specific reinduction regimens.

Zuranolone: The First FDA-Approved Oral Treatment Option for Postpartum Depression.

The objective of this study was to review the characteristics, efficacy, and safety of zuranolone in the management of postpartum depression (PPD). Literature was identified using PubMed (1966-August 2023) and EMBASE (1973-August 2023) and clinicaltrials.gov. Search terms included zuranolone, SAGE-217, and PPD with further limitation of those published in English. Articles selected for inclusion included trials evaluating zuranolone for the treatment of PPD. Zuranolone was evaluated for the treatment of moderate to severe PPD in 2 phase III trials. Both studies resulted in statistically significant improvement in depressive symptoms at day 15 (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001). Sustained differences in remission rates favoring zuranolone were found in both studies at day 45 compared with placebo (P = 0.01 and P < 0.05). Zuranolone was well tolerated, with somnolence, dizziness, headache, and sedation reported as the most common side effects. Zuranolone is only the second medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for PPD and offers an advantage over brexanolone in that it can administered orally in the outpatient setting. The rapid onset of effect of zuranolone is advantageous to traditional antidepressant therapy which can be weeks to months; however, limited information is available on safety during lactation. The recent FDA approval of oral zuranolone for PPD offers a second rapid-acting treatment for PPD, extending the opportunity for treatment to patients in the outpatient setting.

Modified-Release Phosphatidylcholine (LT-02) for Ulcerative Colitis: Two Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of LT-02, a novel modified-release phosphatidylcholine (PC) formulation, for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) and inadequate response to mesalamine. LT-02 was evaluated in a multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study comprising a 12-week induction trial (PCG-2), followed by a 48-week maintenance trial (PCG-4). In PCG-2, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to treatment with 0.8 g LT-02 4 times daily (QID), 1.6 g LT-02 twice daily (BID), or placebo, respectively. All patients continued to take a standard dose of oral mesalamine (≥2.4 g/day). The primary end point in PCG-2 was deep remission. Patients achieving remission at week 12 were randomly assigned 2:1:1 to 1.6 g LT-02 BID, placebo, or 500 mg mesalamine (3 times daily), respectively, in PCG-4; the primary end point was remission at 48 weeks. PCG-2 was terminated early for futility after a prespecified interim analysis; 466 patients (of 762 planned) were randomized. There was no statistically significant difference in deep remission at week 12 (placebo, 13.5%; LT-02 BID, 14.2%; LT-02 QID, 9.7%). In PCG-4, 150 patients (of approximately 400 planned) were randomized. There was no statistically significant difference in remission rates at week 48 (LT-02 BID, 49.3%; mesalamine, 50.0%; placebo, 43.2%). LT-02 was safe. Despite prior evidence of beneficial effects of PC in phase 2 trials, our induction study withLT-02 in patients with mild to moderate UC was terminated prematurely for futility. Signals of efficacy in maintenance therapy require confirmation in an adequately powered maintenance trial. LT-02 was safe and well-tolerated. gov: NCT02280629, NCT02142725.

Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To explore the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a treatment approach for ulcerative colitis (UC), a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. To collect and evaluate randomized controlled trials of high quality on FMT for UC, we searched a number of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline, for studies published between the establishment of the databases and March 2023. We conducted a meta-analysis of the studies using Review Manager software (version 5.4.1) to determine the differences in rates of remission and adverse reactions between the FMT group and the control group, utilizing the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to combine our findings. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of FMT in patients with UC were included in the study, in which 580 patients participated, including 293 patients treated with FMT and 287 control subjects. Meta-analysis revealed that clinical remission was significantly better in the FMT group than in the control group [RR = 1.73; 95% CI = (1.41, 2.12); P < 0.00001]; endoscopic remission was significantly better in the FMT group than in the control group [RR = 1.74; 95% CI = (1.24, 2.44); P = 0.001]. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups [RR = 1.00; 95% CI = (0.86, 1.15); P = 0.96]. Fecal microbiota transplantation has shown potential as a therapeutic intervention for inducing clinical remission in ulcerative colitis UC; nevertheless, the attainment of endoscopic remission and the maintenance of long-term remission continue to present challenges. Safety concerns persist throughout the treatment process, necessitating the implementation of measures to augment both safety and success rates.

Analysis 33 patients of non-DS-AMKL with or without acquired trisomy 21 from multiple centers and compared to 118 AML patients

ABSTRACTBackgroundAcute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) without Down syndrome (non-DS-AMKL) usually a worse outcome than DS-AMKL. Acquired trisomy 21(+21) was one of the most common cytogenetic abnormalities in non-DS-AMKL. Knowledge of the difference in the clinical characteristics and prognosis between non-DS-AMKL with +21 and those without +21 is limited.ObjectiveVerify the clinical characteristics and prognosis of non-DS-AMKL with +21.MethodWe retrospectively analyzed 33 non-DS-AMKL pediatric patients and 118 other types of AML, along with their clinical manifestations, laboratory data, and treatment response.ResultsCompared with AMKL without +21, AMKL with +21 has a lower platelet count (44.04 ± 5.01G/L) at onset (P > 0.05). Differences in remission rates between AMKL and other types of AML were not significant. Acquired trisomy 8 in AMKL was negatively correlated with the long-term OS rate (P < 0.05), while +21 may not be an impact factor. Compared with the other types of AML, AMKL has a younger onset age (P < 0.05), with a mean of 22.27 months. Anemia, hemorrhage, lymph node enlargement, lower white blood cell, and complex karyotype were more common in AMKL (P < 0.05). AMKL has a longer time interval between onset to diagnosis (53.61 ± 71.15 days) (P < 0.05), and patients with a diagnosis delay ≥3 months always presented as thrombocytopenia or pancytopenia initially.ConclusionsDue to high heterogeneity, high misdiagnosis rate, and myelofibrosis, parts of AMKL may take a long time to be diagnosed, requiring repeated bone marrow punctures. Complex karyotype was common in AMKL. +21 may not be a promising indicator of a poor prognosis.

Azathioprine vs methotrexate in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a monocentric retrospective study.

To analyse the effectiveness, safety and steroid-sparing effect of AZA and MTX as induction of remission and maintenance treatment in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. We retrospectively collected data from 57 patients divided into four groups according to treatment: MTX/AZA as first-line agents (MTX1/AZA1) in non-severe disease or as second-line maintenance therapy (MTX2/AZA2) in severe disease previously treated with CYC/rituximab. During the first 5 years of treatment with AZA/MTX we compared the groups according to: remission rate [defined as R1: BVAS = 0; R2: BVAS = 0 with prednisone ≤5 mg/day; R3 (MIRRA definition): BVAS = 0 with prednisone ≤3.75 mg/day], persistence on therapy, cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) dose, relapse and adverse events (AEs). There were no significant differences in remission rates (R1) in each group (63% in MTX1 vs 75% in AZA1, P = 0.53; 91% in MTX2 vs 71% in AZA2, P = 0.23). MTX1 allowed R2 more frequently in the first 6 months compared with AZA1 (54% vs 12%, P = 0.04); no patients receiving AZA1 achieved R3 up to the first 18 months (vs 35% in MTX1, P = 0.07). The cumulative GC dose was lower for MTX2 vs AZA2 (6 g vs 10.7 g at 5 years, P = 0.03). MTX caused more AEs compared with AZA (66% vs 30%, P = 0.004), without affecting the suspension rate. No differences emerged in time-to-first relapse, although fewer patients treated with AZA2 had asthma/ENT relapses (23% vs 64%, P = 0.04). A significant proportion of patients achieved remission with both MTX and AZA. MTX1 had an earlier remission on a lower GC dose but MTX2 had a better steroid-sparing effect.

#4183 A PHENOTYPIC DRIVEN RITUXIMAB MAINTENANCE APPROACH IS EFFECTIVE AND SAFE IN PATIENTS WITH ANCA ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

Abstract Background and Aims Rituximab (RTX) has emerged as the first-line treatment to maintain remission in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV). However, the ideal strategy to RTX re-dosing is still unclear [1]. Method In this monocentric and retrospective study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of two RTX-based maintenance regimens in patients with AAV. Fixed-dose (FD) RTX dosing, consisting of at least 3 pre-emptive RTX administrations every 6 months, was preferred in patients judged to be at high relapse risk. Instead, a biomarker-guided on-demand (OD) RTX dosing strategy was preferred for patients deemed at lower risk of relapse; this consisted in RTX re-treatment only in case of B-cell repopulation or rise in ANCA titer. The single patient relapse risk was assessed according to the disease phenotype (granulomatous vs vasculitic), the ANCA specificity and the disease status (onset vs relapse). Relapses were defined as increase of disease activity requiring escalation of immunosuppression; major relapses were defined in case of life/organ-threatening manifestations. Results The study included 100 patients followed for a median of 24 months (IQR 20-30), 51% treated with an OD and 49% with a FD strategy. The main baseline characteristics of our cohort are shown in the Table; patients treated with a FD strategy were more often GPA, PR3-ANCA positive, with relapsing disease and ENT involvement and less frequent renal involvement. The FD group received a median of 4 (IQR 4-4) administrations of RTX for a median cumulative dose of 2 g (IQR 2-2). Only 6 (11.8%) patients in the OD group received RTX as maintenance therapy with a median of 1 (IQR 1-3) administration of RTX for a median cumulative dose of 0.75 g (IQR 0.5-1.75). Thirteen relapses occurred, 6 in the FD group and 7 in the OD one. Remission rates were comparable in the two cohorts, with respectively 87.6% and 85.9% of the patients in remission at 24 months (Figure 1 - panel A). No significant differences in remission rates across the 2 groups were observed after considering only major flares or after stratification according to clinical diagnosis (MPA/GPA) and ANCA specificity (Figure 1 - panel B to F). Ten and 20 severe infections (p = 0.383) and 3 and 1 cancer (p = 0.581) occurred respectively in the FD and OD group. Conclusion In our case series, a phenotypic-driven approach to RTX maintenance showed comparable efficacy and safety between fixed and on-demand dosing, despite different baseline characteristics between the two groups. These results suggest that personalizing RTX maintenance may be a feasible and safe strategy.

Early Efficacy Observation of Pomalidomide-based Regimen in the Treatment of High-risk Multiple Myeloma

To investigate the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide based regimen in the treatment of high-risk multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical data of 27 high-risk MM patients treated in Shanxi Bethune Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with pomadomide based regimen for at least 2 consecutive cycles, and the early therapeutic effect and safety were observed. Overall remission rate (ORR) was 63.0%(17/27 cases) and deep remission rate was 22.2%(6/27 cases) after 2 cycles of treatment; ORR was 90.5%(19/21 cases) and deep remission rate was 66.7%(14/21 cases) after 4 cycles of treatment. Both ORR and deep remission rate were significantly higher after 4 cycles of treatment than 2 cycles (P=0.044, P=0.003). Beyond that, in the newly diagnosed and relapsed refractory MM groups, ORR after 2 cycles of treatment were 75%(9/12 cases) and 60%(9/15 cases), and deep remission rates were 25%(3/12 cases) and 20%(3/15 cases), respectively; ORR after 4 cycles of treatment were 100%(9/9 cases) and 83.3%(10/12 cases), and deep remission rates were 77.8%(7/9 cases) and 58.3%(7/12 cases), respectively, while there was no significant difference in remission rates between the two groups (P>0.05). In the group of creatinine ≥177 μmol/L, the serum creatinine level was significantly decreased after 2 cycles of treatment compared with that pre-treatment (P=0.001). The 1q21 amplified subgroup accounted for the largest proportion (21/27 cases), ORR was 66.7%(14/21 cases) and deep remission rate was 23.8%(5/21 cases) after 2 cycles of treatment, ORR was 88.9%(16/18 cases) and deep remission rate was 66.7%(12/18 cases) after 4 cycles of treatment. In all the symptoms, the most common adverse reactions were pulmonary infection in 9 cases and hematological adverse reactions of grade 1-2 in 8 cases. The pomalidomide-based treatment regimen has good early curative effect on the newly diagnosed and relapsed refractory high-risk MM, and also benefits to the high-risk cytogenetic MM, or MM with renal impairment. Therefore, this treatment regimen showed a good safety, and the long-term curative effect needs to be further assessed by more clinical data.

Reoperation for Recurrent and Persistent Cushing's Disease without Visible MRI Findings.

Transsphenoidal surgery is the first-line treatment for Cushing's disease (CD), even with negative preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. Some patients with persistent or recurring hypercortisolism have negative MRI findings after the initial surgery. We aimed to analyze the efficacy of repeat surgery in two groups of patients and determine if there is an association between positive MRI findings and early remission. Clinical, imaging, and biochemical information of 42 patients who underwent repeat surgery by a single neurosurgeon between 2002 and 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. We compared the endocrinological, histopathological, and surgical outcomes before and after repeat surgery among 14 CD patients with negative MRI findings and 28 patients with positive MRI findings. Immediate remission was achieved in 29 patients (69.0%) who underwent repeat surgery. Among all patients, 28 (66.7%) had MRI findings consistent with solid lesions. There was no significant difference in remission rates between the recurrence and persistence groups (77.8% vs. 57.1%, odds ratio = 2.625, 95% confidence interval = 0.651 to 10.586). Patients in remission after repeat surgery were not associated with positive MRI findings (odds ratio = 3.667, 95% confidence interval = 0.920 to 14.622). In terms of recurrence, repeat surgery in patients with either positive or negative MRI findings showed reasonable remission rates. For persistent disease with positive MRI findings, repeat surgery is still an option; however, more solid evidence is needed to determine if negative MRI findings are predictors for failed reoperations for persistent hypercortisolism.

Prognostic factors in major depressive disorder: comparing responders and non-responders to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), a naturalistic retrospective chart review.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely utilized as an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with varying response rates. Factors associated with better treatment outcome remain scarce. This naturalistic retrospective chart review hopes to shed light on easily obtainable and measurable predictive factors for patients referred to rTMS. Protocol parameters, medication, rated scales, rTMS protocols, and treatment outcomes were reviewed for 196 patients with MDD who received rTMS at Saint Boniface Hospital between 2013 and 2019. Logistic regression and marginal effects were used to assess the different predictor variables for response (50% reduction or more on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D)) and remission (Ham-D of ≤7 by the last session). HamD at 10 sessions was predictive of remission, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at 10 sessions was predictive of response to rTMS. Ham-D, SDS, and Beck Anxiety Inventory were predictive of remission and response by Beck Anxiety Inventory 20 sessions. High frequency rTMS had a similar response and remission rate to low frequency, but higher response rate to intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation with no difference in remission rate. Positive predictive factors of response were lower age and bupropion use. Negative predictive factors were antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, or benzodiazepine use. For remission, antipsychotics or anticonvulsants use were negative predictors; bupropion use and higher resting motor threshold were positive predictors. Severity of depression as measured by baseline HamD was not associated with different probabilities of treatment success.

Remission or Not Remission, That's the Question: Shedding Light on Remission and the Impact of Objective and Subjective Measures Reflecting Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

IntroductionThe inclusion of certain variables in remission formulas for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may give rise to discrepancies. An increase in patient global assessment (PGA), a variable showing the patient's self-evaluation of their disease activity, may alone tilt a patient out of remission when using certain remission-assessing methods. This study aimed to explore differences in remission rates among various formulas and the impact of PGA and other clinical variables on the calculation of remission.MethodsData were collected from RA patients monitored during the years 2015–2019 at an outpatient clinic in southern Norway. Linear and logistic regression assessed associations between PGA, other RA-related variables, and remission-assessing methods.ResultsRemission rates were 23%, 65%, and 73% in 2019 when assessing the same 502 RA patients using Boolean remission, Boolean remission without PGA, and the disease activity score (DAS) with C-reactive peptide [DAS28(3)-CRP] method, respectively. Among the same population that year, 27% reported PGA ≤ 10, 74% had a tender joint count of ≤ 1, 85% had a swollen joint count of ≤ 1, and 86% had CRP ≤ 10. Pain (standardized coefficient β = 0.7, p < 0.001) was most strongly associated with PGA. Pain, fatigue, and morning stiffness were substantially associated with the remission-assessing methods that incorporated PGA.ConclusionsSince PGA is strongly associated with the patient’s perception of pain and may not reflect the inflammatory process, our study challenges the application of remission-assessing methods containing PGA when monitoring RA patients in the outpatient clinic. We recommend using measures that are less likely to be associated with noninflammatory pain and psychosocial factors.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00490-5.