Difference In Primary Patency Research Articles

Post hoc analysis of the SuperB and Zilverpass trials for treatment of long and complex superficial femoral artery lesions

ObjectiveIn two randomized controlled trials, the outcomes of endovascular treatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial lesions were compared with bypass surgery and considered a valid alternative treatment. The aim of this study was to compare both endovascular treatment options with the hypothesis that implantation of heparin-bonded self-expanding covered stents (Viabahn, SECS) or drug-eluting stents (ZilverPTX, DES) are related to similar clinical outcomes at one-year follow-up. MethodsIn a post-hoc analysis, the SuperB trial and Zilverpass databases were merged. Patients in the endovascular treatment arms were included and data was analyzed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol (PP) fashion. Data included baseline and lesion characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up data. The primary endpoint of this study was primary patency at one-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were secondary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb loss, and all-cause mortality. ResultsA total of 176 patients were included; 63 in the SECS arm and 113 in the DES arm. Through 1-year follow-up there were no significant differences in primary patency (ITT 63.4% vs 71.1%: p=0.183 and PP 60.8% vs 71.1%; p=0.100). Secondary patency rates were not significantly different in the ITT analysis (86.5% vs 95.1%; p=0.054), but in the PP analysis, there was a significant difference in favor of the DES group (SECS 85.6% versus DES 95.1%; p=0.038). There was no significant difference in freedom from TLR between groups (79.6% vs 77.0%, p=0.481). No major amputations were performed in the SECS group and two in the DES group (1.8%). Survival rate was 98.2% in the SECS group, and 91.3% in the DES group after one-year follow-up (p=0.106). Based on diagnosis (IC versus CLTI) no differences between IC and CLTI patients were observed in primary, secondary patency and freedom from TLR. ConclusionsTreatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial disease with the heparin-bonded Viabahn endoprosthesis and the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent are related to similar primary and secondary patency, and TLR rates at one-year, except for secondary patency in the PP analysis. This study further supports the endovascular treatment of long complex lesions in the femoropopliteal artery.

Initial experience with the ambulatory management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with May-Thurner syndrome with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty and stenting

ObjectivePatients undergoing intervention for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) typically require inpatient (IP) hospitalization for initial treatment with anticoagulation and management with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. Direct oral anticoagulants and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) devices offer the opportunity for outpatient (OP) management. We describe our approach with these patients. MethodsPatients receiving intervention for acute IFDVT from January 2020 through October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing unilateral thrombectomy, venous angioplasty, and stenting for IFDVT with MTS comprised the study population and were divided into two groups: (1) patients admitted to the hospital and treated as IPs and (2) patients who underwent therapy as OPs. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural success, complications, and follow-up. ResultsA total of 92 patients were treated for IFDVT with thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting of whom 58 comprised the IP group and 34 the OP group. All 92 patients underwent PMT using the Inari ClotTriever (Inari Medical), intravascular ultrasound, angioplasty, and stenting with 100% technical success. Three patients in the IP group required adjuvant thrombolysis. There was no difference in primary patency of the treated IFDVT segment at 12 months between the two groups (IP, 73.5%; OP, 86.7%; P = .21, log-rank test). ConclusionsPatients with acute IFDVT and MTS deemed appropriate for thrombectomy and iliac revascularization can be managed with initiation of ambulatory direct oral anticoagulant therapy and subsequent return for ambulatory PMT, angioplasty, and stenting. This approach avoids the expense of IP care and allows for effective use of resources at a time when staffing and supply chain shortages have led to inefficiencies in the provision of IP care for nonemergent conditions.

Impact of Calcification on the Outcomes of Femoropopliteal Artery Endovascular Treatment Using a Polymer Coated Drug-Eluting Stent.

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of calcification on the 12 and 24 months outcomes of the Eluvia™ (Boston Scientific®) drug-eluting stent (DES) for femoropopliteal occlusive disease using three different calcium scoring systems. A single-center, retrospective cohort-study (March-2016 to December-2018) of patients treated with the Eluvia™ DES for femoropopliteal atherosclerosis was performed. Outcomes included primary and secondary patency rates and freedom from target lesion revascularization (FTLR) and were analyzed by comparing the impact of calcium burden according to the following calcium scores: Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) score, number of vessel quadrants affected (0-4) and calcification score per Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC) definitions. In total, 111 Patients were included (mean age: 71.2 ± 7.9; 64% male). Most patients presented with Rutherford class 3 (79.9%), followed by class 5 (12.7%), class 4 (10%) and class 6 (6.4%). The mean lesion length was 197.6 ± 108.5mm and 74.3% of patients had chronic total occlusions. There were no differences in primary patency between the calcification scores at 12months (PACSS, LogRank = 0.28; quadrants, LogRank = 0.29; PARC, LogRank = 0.42) and 24months (PACSS, LogRank = 0.13; quadrants, LogRank = 0.42; PARC, LogRank = 0.13). FTLR was significantly lower at 12months in patients with calcification affecting 3 or 4 quadrants (LogRank = 0.022) but not at 24months (LogRank = 0.36). In this study, the Eluvia™ DES showed promising performance in calcified disease and the analysis according to the quadrant model predicted an increased risk for TLR at 12months.

Long-term outcomes of staged iliofemoral endoconduits prior to complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveAdverse iliofemoral anatomy may preclude complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). In our practice, staged iliofemoral endoconduits (ECs) are planned prior to complex EVAR to improve vascular access and decrease operative time while allowing the stented vessel to heal. This study describes the long-term results of iliofemoral ECs prior to complex EVAR. MethodsBetween 2012 and 2023, 59 patients (44% male; median age, 75 ± 6 years) underwent ECs before complex EVAR using self-expanding covered stents (Viabahn). For common femoral artery (CFA) disease, ECs were delivered percutaneously from contralateral femoral access and extended into the CFA to preserve the future access site for stent graft delivery. Internal iliac artery patency was maintained when feasible. During complex EVAR, the EC extended into the CFA was directly accessed and sequentially dilated until it could accommodate the endograft. Technical success was defined as successful access, closure, and delivery of the endograft during complex EVAR. Endpoints were vascular injury or EC disruption, secondary interventions, and EC patency. ResultsUnilateral EC was performed in 45 patients (76%). ECs were extended into the CFA in 21 patients (35%). Median diameters of the native common iliac, external iliac, and CFA were 7 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 6-8 mm), 6 mm (IQR, 5-7 mm), and 6 mm (IQR, 6-7 mm), respectively. Internal iliac artery was inadvertently excluded in 10 patients (17%). Six patients (10%) had an intraoperative vascular injury during the EC procedure, and six patients (10%) had EC disruption during complex EVAR, including five EC collapses requiring re-stenting and one EC fracture requiring open cut-down and reconstruction with patch angioplasty. In 23 patients (39%), 22 Fr OD devices were used; 20 Fr were used in 22 patients (37%), and 18 Fr in 14 patients (24%). Technical success for accessing EC was 89%. There was no difference in major adverse events at 30 days between the iliac ECs and iliofemoral ECs. Primary patency by Kaplan-Meier estimates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 97.5%, 89%, and 82%, respectively. There was no difference in primary patency between iliac and iliofemoral ECs. Six secondary interventions (10%) were required. The mean follow-up was 34 ± 27 months; no limb loss or amputations occurred during the follow-up. ConclusionsECs improve vascular access, and their use prior to complex EVAR is associated with low rates of vascular injury, high technical success, and optimal long-term patency. Complex EVAR procedures can be performed percutaneously by accessing the EC directly under ultrasound guidance and using sequential dilation to avoid EC disruption.

Outcome of Endovascular Procedure in Chronic Limb Ischemia Femoropopliteal Lesion: A Literature Review

Introduction. Angioplasty and stenting are the two main endovascular treatments for femoropopliteal lesions associated with chronic limb ischemia. To summarize the research in this area, this article examines the state of these treatments today, diving into clinical subtleties and new trends. The objectives was to thoroughly analyze the body of research, combining knowledge about the results of endovascular angioplasty and stenting. Methods: Literature was searched in some databases (Cochrane, PubMed, and EBSCO) from June to July 2021. Results: Five articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified. There were two randomized control trials and three cohort studies. There was no difference in primary patency of balloon angioplasty and nitinol stenting on follow-up for five years. Amputation-free survival rates in the coated balloon and plain balloon groups were not different. Revascularization was also not significantly different in both groups. There was no complication reported in either group. Mortality rates in both groups were also not different after follow-up in 30 days. Conclusions: There were no notable variations in the results of endovascular angioplasty and stenting for femoropopliteal lesions associated with chronic limb ischemia.

Association between heart failure and arteriovenous access patency in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis

BackgroundHeart disease and chronic kidney disease are often comorbid conditions owing to shared risk factors, including diabetes and hypertension. However, the effect of congestive heart failure (CHF) on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and AV graft (AVG) patency rates is poorly understood. We hypothesize preexisting HF may diminish blood flow to the developing AVF and worsen patency. MethodsWe conducted a single-institution retrospective review of 412 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent hemodialysis access creation from 2015 to 2021. Patients were stratified based on presence of preexisting CHF, defined as clinical symptoms plus evidence of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (<50%) or diastolic dysfunction on preoperative echocardiography. Baseline demographics, preoperative measures of cardiac function, and dialysis access-related surgical history were collected. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were performed for primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency using standard definitions for patency from the literature. We assessed differences in patency for patients with CHF vs patients without CHF, patients with a reduced vs a normal EF, and AVG vs AVF in patients with CHF. ResultsWe included 204 patients (50%) with preexisting CHF with confirmatory echocardiography. Patients with CHF were more likely to be male and have comorbidities including, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and a history of cerebrovascular accident. The groups were not significantly different in terms of prior fistula history (P = .99), body mass index (P = .74), or type of hemodialysis access created (P = .54). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency, primary-assisted patency, or secondary patency over time in the CHF vs non-CHF group (log-rank P > .05 for all three patency measures). When stratified by preoperative left ventricular EF, patients with an EF of <50% had lower primary (38% vs 51% at 1 year), primary-assisted (76% vs 82% at 1 year), and secondary patency (86% vs 93% at 1 year) rates than those with a normal EF. Difference reached significance for secondary patency only (log-rank P = .029). AVG patency was compared against AVF patency within the CHF subgroup, with significantly lower primary-assisted (39% vs 87% at 1 year) and secondary (62% vs 95%) patency rates for AVG (P < .0001 for both). ConclusionsIn this 7-year experience of hemodialysis access creation, reduced EF is associated with lower secondary patency. Preoperative CHF (including HF with reduced EF and HF with preserved EF together) is not associated with significant differences in overall hemodialysis access patency rates over time, but patients with CHF who receive AVG have markedly worse patency than those who receive AVF. For patients with end-stage renal disease and CHF, the risks and benefits must be carefully weighed, particularly for those with low EF or lack of a suitable vein for fistula creation.

Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy Versus PTA/Supera Stenting for Popliteal Artery Lesions: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

This study examines the use and impact of directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) versus angioplasty plus Supera stent implantation on the outcomes during endovascular treatment of popliteal lesions in clinical practice. Overall 143 consecutive patients (mean age 75.0±12.2 years, 72% male), with isolated atherosclerotic disease of the popliteal artery who underwent endovascular treatment using DAART therapy or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/Supera stenting of the popliteal artery between January 2016 and December 2021 were identified from a retrospectively database. Patient and plaque characteristics were collected. A propensity-score matched, case-control analysis was conducted to balance covariates between the group of patients who underwent DAART and the one treated by PTA/Supera stenting. A total of 51 patients (35.7%) showed severe claudication and 92 (64.3%) critical limb ischemia. There was a trend toward longer treated lesions (90.4±81 vs 72.5±5.3 mm, p=0.089) and more chronic total occlusions (60.5% vs 46.8%, p=0.058) in the PTA/Supera stenting group, although not reaching statistically significance. Moderate-to-severe calcification was present in most lesions treated (75.8% of DAART group, 80.2% of PTA/Supera stenting group, and 78.3% of total cohort). Among the 53 case-matched pairs of patients treated with DAART or PTA/Supera stenting, there were no significant differences in short-term outcomes, including rate of technical success (96.2% vs 98.1%, p=0.232), procedural success (88.7% vs 90.1%, p=0.251), distal embolization (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.178), dissection (5.7% vs 1.9%, p=0.268), perforation (3.8% vs 5.6%, p=0.163), hospital discharge (1.2±0.1 vs 1.0±0.1, p=0.325), 30 day minor (28.3% vs 32.1%, p=0.264) or major amputation rates (7.5% vs 3.8%, p=0.107), and 30 day mortality (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.173). At 1 year, there was no difference in primary patency (73.6% vs 77.4%, p=0.233), primary assisted patency (81.3% vs 84.9%, p=0.167), secondary patency (86.8% vs 92.5%, p=0.094), ipsilateral minor (35.8% vs 39.6%, p=0.472) or major amputation (9.4% vs 7.5%, p=0.186), ankle brachial index improvement (0.32±0.12 vs 0.37±0.37, p=0.401), or mortality (5.7% vs 5.7%, p=0.121) rate between patients who underwent DAART or PTA/Supera stenting for popliteal lesions. Twelve-month results following DAART technique or PTA/Supera stenting of atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery are not different, regardless of patient and plaque characteristics. The DAART technique for the treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerotic disease is presented as a "leave nothing behind" strategy with on-year clinical outcomes similar to ATP/Supera stenting.

Clinical characteristics of hemodialysis patients with left brachiocephalic vein obstruction due to extrinsic compression or prior catheterization.

Left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV) stenosis is a common complication in hemodialysis patients and is a heterogenous disorder associated with either prior catheterization or extrinsic compression. This study aimed to characterize patients with LBCV stenosis or occlusion with and without a history of central venous catheterization. We performed a retrospective study in 84 hemodialysis patients with LBCV stenosis or occlusion with (n = 22) or without (n = 62) prior catheterization. We compared the clinical features, anatomical factors, restenosis after balloon venoplasty, and patency rates of patients in these two groups. In the cohort of 84 patients with LBCV stenosis or occlusion, 73.8% (62 patients) of them had no history of catheterization. Patients without prior catheterization had more stenotic lesions (p < 0.05) but less occlusive lesions (p < 0.05) than patients with prior catheterization. The space between the sternum and the aorta was narrower in patients without prior catheterization than that in patients with prior catheterization (p < 0.05). Percutaneous venography was performed in 81 patients, and the occurrence of recoil after venoplasty in patients without prior catheterization was significantly higher than that in patients with prior catheterization (p < 0.05). The rate of stent implantation was significantly higher in patients without prior catheterization than patients with prior catheterization (p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in primary patency between the two groups. LBCV stenosis and occlusion are mainly due to extrinsic compression rather than prior central venous catheterization. Stent implantation is frequently required after venoplasty to treat LBCV obstructive lesions in patients without prior catheterization.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy and Hybrid Surgery in the Treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

To study and compare the clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy with those of hybrid surgery in the treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) D aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Patients with TASC II D-type AIOD who underwent their first surgical treatment at our hospital between March 2018 and March 2021 were enrolled and followed up to evaluate the improvement in symptoms, complications, and primary patency. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the differences in primary patency between the treatment groups. In total, 132 of 139 enrolled patients (94.96%) achieved technical success following treatment. The perioperative mortality rate was 1.44% (2/139), and postoperative complications occurred in two patients. Among the patients who successfully underwent surgery, 120 underwent endovascular treatment (110 patients with stenting and 10 patients with thrombolysis before stenting), 10 underwent hybrid surgery, and 2 underwent open surgery. The follow-up data were compared between the endovascular and hybrid groups. At the end of the follow-up period, the patency rates in the hybrid and endovascular groups were 100% and 89.17% (107/120), respectively. The endovascular group achieved primary patency rates of 94.12%, 92.44%, and 89.08% at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, respectively, whereas the primary patency rate remained at 100% in the hybrid group, with no significant variation between the endovascular and hybrid groups (P = 0.289). The endovascular group was further divided into a stent subgroup (110 patients) and a thrombolysis/stent subgroup (10 patients), and no prominent variation was noted in the primary patency between the two subgroups (P = 0.276). Although open surgery is the gold standard treatment for TASC II D-type AIOD, endovascular and hybrid treatments are feasible and effective. Both methods showed good technical success and early to midterm primary patency rates.

The Results of Femorofemoral Bypass Using a Saphenous Vein Graft as an Alternative to PTFE Grafts.

This study aimed to report the results of femorofemoral bypass (FFB) using a great saphenous vein (GSV) graft as an alternative to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts. From January 2012 to December 2021, 168 patients who underwent FFB (PTFE, 143; GSV, 25) were included. The patients' demographic features and surgical intervention results were retrospectively reviewed. There were no intergroup differences in patients' demographic features. In GSV vs. PTFE grafts, the superficial femoral artery provided statistically significant inflow and outflow (P<0.001 for both), and redo bypass was more common (P=0.021). The mean follow-up duration was 24.7±2.3 months. The primary patency rates at 3 and 5 years were 84% and 74% for PTFE grafts and 82% and 70% for GSV grafts, respectively. There was no significant intergroup difference in primary patency (P=0.661) or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR)-free survival (P=0.758). Clinical characteristics, disease details, and procedures were analyzed as risk factors for graft occlusion. Multivariate analysis revealed that none of the factors was associated with an increased risk of FFB graft occlusion. FFB using PTFE or GSV grafts is a useful method with an approximately 70% 5-year primary patency rate. The GSV and PTFE grafts showed no difference in primary patency or CD-TLR-free survival during follow-up; however, FFB using GSV may be an option in selective situations.

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The optimal endovascular therapy for vein graft stenosis (VGS) following infrainguinal arterial bypass is yet to be established. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have rapidly improved the inferior patency outcomes of angioplasty using a conventional plain balloon (PB). This study compares the efficacy of DCBs and PBs for the treatment of infrainguinal VGS. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Multiple electronic searches were conducted in consultation with a health science librarian in September 2022. Studies describing the comparative outcomes of angioplasty using DCBs and PBs in the treatment of infrainguinal VGS were eligible. Datasets from one randomized controlled trial and two cohort studies with a total of 179 patients were identified. The results indicated no significant difference in target lesion revascularization between DCBs and PBs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32-1.28; p = 0.21), with no significant heterogeneity between studies. Additionally, differences in primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and graft occlusion were not significant. Subgroup analysis showed similar effects for different DCB devices. In conclusion, DCBs showed no significant benefit in the treatment of VGS compared to PBs. Given the small population size of this meta-analysis, future trials with a larger population are desired.

Atherectomy Plus Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Disease Compared to Balloon Angioplasty Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease. <h3>Methods</h3> We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes. <h3>Results</h3> Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; <i>P</i> = .005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; <i>P</i> < .0001). There was no significant difference in TLR when the analysis was performed including only randomized trials. There was no significant difference in the primary patency between the 2 groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14; <i>P</i> = .37). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Data from randomized trials suggest that compared with BA alone, the combination of atherectomy and BA showed no difference in TLR or primary patency. In observational studies, TLR and bailout stenting were reduced in ABA group but there was no difference in primary patency. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA in femoropopliteal lesions compared with BA alone.

Embolic Protection Devices are Not Associated with Improved Outcomes of Atherectomy for Lower Extremity Revascularization

Atherectomy is associated with a risk of distal embolization, but the role of embolic protection devices (EPDs) during atherectomy is not well-defined. This study examines the utilization and impact of EPD on the outcomes of atherectomy during peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). The annual trend in utilization of EPD during atherectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative PVI files (2010-2018) was derived. Patients with concomitant open surgery, acute limb ischemia, emergent-status, concomitant thrombolysis, missing indication, missing EPD use, and missing long-term follow-up data were excluded. The characteristics of patients undergoing atherectomy with and without EPD were compared. Propensity matching based on age, gender, race, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, end-stage renal disease, prior PVI, indication, urgent-status, TransAtlantic interSociety Consensus classification, and anatomical location of lesion was performed. The perioperative and 1-year outcomes of the matched groups were compared. EPD was used in 23.3% of atherectomy procedures (n=5,013/21,500). The utilization of EPD with atherectomy increased from 8.8% to 22.7% (P=0.003) during the study period. Patients undergoing atherectomy without EPD were more likely to have ESRD (7.8% vs. 5.2%; P<0.001), tissue loss (31% vs. 23.1; P<0.001), tibial intervention (39.6% vs. 23.3%; P<0.001), higher number of arteries treated (1.78±0.92 vs. 1.68±0.93; P=0.001), and longer length of lesion (21.15±21.14 vs. 19±20.27cm; P=0.004). Conversely, patients undergoing atherectomy with EPD were more likely to be White (81.1% vs. 74%; P<0.001), have a history of smoking (80.6% vs. 74.5%; P<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (24.8% vs. 21.6%; P<0.037), coronary artery disease (38.5% vs. 33.2%; P=0.002), prior percutaneous coronary intervention (24.3% vs. 19.9%, P=0.005), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (32.3% vs. 24.9%; P<0.001), and prior PVI (49.2% vs. 45.1%; P=0.023). After propensity matching, there were 1,007 patients in each group with no significant difference in baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in short-term outcomes including the rate of distal embolization, technical success, dissection, perforation, discharge to home, and 30-day mortality. The use of EPD was, however, associated with longer fluoroscopy time. At 1-year, there was also no difference in primary patency, ipsilateral minor or major amputation, ankle brachial index improvement, reintervention, or mortality rate between patients who underwent atherectomy with and without EPD. EPD has been increasingly used in conjunction with atherectomy especially in patients with claudication and femoropopliteal disease. However, the use of EPD during atherectomy does not seem to impact the outcomes. Further research is needed to justify the additional cost and fluoroscopy time associated with the use of EPD during atherectomy.

Comparison of Interwoven Nitinol and Drug-Eluting Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

Interwoven nitinol stents (INS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) were designed to improve the mid- and long-term results of femoropopliteal (F-P) angioplasty. The aim of this study was to systematically compare these stents. Between 2015 and 2017, 62 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the F-P segment treated by INS or DES were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. The primary outcome measure was one-year primary patency; secondary outcomes were in-stent restenosis (ISR), stent occlusion, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. The mean follow-up was 26.9 ± 11.2 months. No statistically significant difference in primary patency at one year was observed (88.6% vs. 88.9%). Throughout follow-up, overall rates of ISR (5.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.645), stent occlusion (25.7% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.094) and TLR (25.7% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.505) were statistically equivalent between the groups. Mortality reached 14.3% in the INS group and 3.7% in the DES group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). Multivariable analysis revealed significant correlations between ISR and stent occlusions; popliteal lesion localization (p = 0.016) and poor below the knee vessel outflow (p < 0.001). In the short- and mid-term, the use of an INS or DES in the F-P arterial segment did not result in a difference in primary patency rate, stent occlusion, restenosis, re-intervention or mortality. The overall data do not provide any evidence to favor one stent over the other.

Lack of Adherence to Vascular Access Creation Guidelines Results in Decreased Survival

<h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3> Current guidelines from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) recommend referral to vascular surgery and creation of permanent hemodialysis (HD) access in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease stage 4 (GFR=15-25) if a vein is suitable for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. Despite this, it is estimated that over half of patients initiating HD do so via catheter-based access. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by physicians who perform HD access creation. <h3>Methods</h3> The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) HD access data set was queried to identify patients who received an AVF as their initial surgical access from 2011-2019. Patients were categorized by their glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and defined as early (GFR=15-25 mL/min/1.73m2) or late (GFR<15 mL/min/1.73m2 or on HD) AVF creation in relation to adherence with national guidelines. Patients with arteriovenous graft were excluded. Demographics and comorbidities were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves were created to identify factors associated with early AVF creation as well as differences in survival and primary patency between groups. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 24,787 patients who received an AVF as their first surgical access, only 4,074 (16.4%) were in the early AVF creation group. The early AVF creation rate decreased over time from 17.7% in 2011 to 12.4% in 2019 (P<.0001). Notably, 53.6% (n=13,288) of patients were on HD at the time of initial AVF creation. Early AVF creation patients were more likely to be male (63% vs 58.2%, P<.0001) or insured (97.8% vs 95.4%, P<.0001) and less likely to be African American (27.7% vs 31.9%, P<.0001). Multivariate logistic models demonstrated that female birth sex (OR=0.8, 95%CI=0.74-0.87) and uninsured status (OR=0.64, 95%CI=0.49-0.85) were independently associated with decreased odds of early AVF creation. Patients who underwent late AVF creation had no significant difference in primary patency at 6 months (72% vs 68%, p=0.166; Figure 01), however, were noted to have worse 1-year survival (88% vs 90%, p=.01; Figure 02) when compared to those who underwent early AVF creation. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Despite an emphasis on timely HD access creation, most incident AVFs are created later than clinical guidelines recommend, particularly in female and uninsured patients. This delay does not worsen AVF primary patency, however, it is associated with decreased survival. Potential factors such as access to specialty care and geographic variations in care should be studied to facilitate improved outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Outcomes of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable stent graft for endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms using iliac branch endoprosthesis

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of internal iliac artery (IIA) stenting using balloon-expandable (BESG) or self-expandable stent grafts (SESG) during endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms with iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE; W. L. Gore, Flagstaff, Ariz). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients treated for aortoiliac aneurysms using IBE between 2014 and 2020. IIA stenting was performed using either the IIA side branch SESG or a Gore VBX BESG (W. L. Gore). Indications for use of BESGs were “up-and-over” IBE technique for type IB endoleak after prior endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), short IIA length, and need for IIA extension into divisional branches (outside instructions for use). End points included technical success, freedom from buttock claudication, primary IIA patency, and freedom from IIA branch instability (eg, branch-related death or rupture, occlusion, disconnection, or reintervention for stenosis, kink, or endoleak), freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleak, and freedom from secondary interventions. ResultsThere were 90 patients (86 males and 4 females) with a mean age of 74 ± 7 years treated by EVAR with 108 IBEs. Choice of stent was BESG in 43 and SESG in 65 targeted IIAs. BESGs were used more frequently in patients with prior EVAR (22% vs 2%; P = .003,), isolated IBEs (31% vs 2%; P < .001), and in patients with IIA aneurysms requiring stenting into divisional branches (36% vs 5%; P < .001). Technical success was similar for BESGs and SESGs (97% vs 100%; P = .40), respectively. The mean follow-up was 25 ± 16 months (range, 11-34 months). At 2 years, freedom from buttock claudication was 100% for BESG and 95 ± 3% for SESG (Log-rank 0.26), with no difference in primary patency (BESG, 100% vs SESG, 94 ± 4%; Log-rank 0.94). There were four (9%) IIA-related endoleaks in the BESG group and one (2%) in the SESG group (P = .08). Freedom from IIA branch instability was 87 ± 6% for BESG and 96 ± 3% for SESG at 2 years (Log-rank 0.043). Freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleak was 87 ± 7% for BESG and 98 ± 2% for SESG at the same interval (Log-rank 0.06). There was no difference in freedom from reinterventions for BESG and SESG (92 ± 6% vs 98 ± 2%; Log-rank 0.34), respectively. ConclusionsBESGs were used more frequently during IBE procedures indicated for failed EVAR, isolated common iliac aneurysms, and IIA aneurysms requiring extension into divisional branches. Despite these differences and BESG being used outside instructions for use, both stent types had similar primary patency, freedom from buttock claudication, and freedom from reinterventions. However, BESGs were associated with higher rates of IIA-related branch instability.

To Close, Observe, or Reconstruct: The Third Way of Managing Dialysis Fistula Aneurysms in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Background: The management of patent dialysis fistulas in patients after kidney transplantation (KTx) is controversial—the options that are usually considered are the fistula’s closure or observation. Many complications of dialysis fistulas occur in patients after KTx, and immunosuppression increases the risk of fistula aneurysms and hyperkinetic flow. This study aimed to evaluate the results of dialysis fistula aneurysm treatment in patients after KTx and to compare them to procedures performed in an end-stage renal disease (ESRD) dialyzed population. Methods: We enrolled 83 renal transplant recipients and 123 ESRD patients with dialysis fistula aneurysms qualified for surgical revision to this single-center, prospective study. The results of the surgical treatment of dialysis fistula aneurysms were analyzed, and the primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rate, percentage and type of complications were also assessed. Results: For the treatment of dialysis fistula aneurysms in transplant patients, we performed dialysis fistula excisions with fistula closure in 50 patients (60.2%), excision with primary fistula reconstruction (n = 10, 12.0%) or excision with PTFE bypasses (n = 23, 27.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients (13.3%) during a follow-up (median follow-up, 36 months), mostly in distant periods (median time after correction procedure, 11.7 months). The most common complication was outflow stenosis, followed by hematoma, dialysis fistula thrombosis and the formation of a new aneurysm and postoperative bleeding, infection and lymphocele. The 12-month primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates of fistulas corrected by aneurysm excision and primary reconstruction in the KTx group were all 100%; in the control ESRD group, the 12-month primary rate was 70%, and the primary assisted and secondary patency rates were 100%. The 12-month primary, primarily assisted and secondary patency rates after dialysis fistula aneurysm excision combined with PTFE bypass were better in the KTx group than in the control ESRD group (85% vs. 71.8%, 90% vs. 84.5% and 95% vs. 91.7%, respectively). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significant difference in primary patency (p = 0.018) and assisted primary (p = 0.018) rates and a strong tendency in secondary patency rates (p = 0.053) between the KTx and ESRD groups after dialysis fistula excisions combined with PTFE bypass. No statistically significant differences in patency rates between fistulas treated by primary reconstruction and reconstructed with PTFE bypass were observed in KTx patients. Conclusions: Reconstructions of dialysis fistula aneurysms give good long-term results, with a low risk of complications. The reconstruction of dialysis fistulas can be an effective treatment method. Thus, this is an attractive option in addition to fistula ligation or observation in patients after KTx. Reconstructions of dialysis fistula aneurysms enable the preservation of the dialysis fistula while reducing various complications.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment and natural history of popliteal artery aneurysms.

To summarize the best available evidence comparing open vs endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair. We also summarized the natural history of PAAs to support of the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus for studies of patients with PAAs treated with an open vs an endovascular approach. We also included studies of natural history of untreated patients. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed when appropriate. We identified 32 original studies and 4 systematic reviews from 2191 candidate references. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the endovascular approach, open surgical repair was associated with higher primary patency at1year (odds ratio [OR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.12), lower occlusion rate at 30days (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.68) and fewer reinterventions (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17-0.45), but a longer hospital stay (standardized mean difference, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.23-3.09) and more wound complications (OR, 5.18; 95% CI, 2.19-12.26). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency at 3years (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.97-1.97), secondary patency (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.84-3.03), mortality at the longest follow-up (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.17), mortality at 30days (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-1.36), or amputation (incidence rate ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.56-1.31). The certainty in these estimates was, in general, low. Studies of PAA natural history suggest that thromboembolic complications and amputation develop at a mean observation time of 18months and they are frequent. One study showed that at 5years, approximately one-half of the patients had complications. This systematic review provides event rates for outcomes important to patients with PAAs. Despite the low certainty of the evidence, these rates along with surgical expertise and anatomic feasibility can help patients and surgeons to engage in shared decision-making.

Redo Hemodialysis Access in Elderly Patients has Acceptable Outcomes With Similar Patency of Arteriovenous Fistulas as Compared to Grafts

ObjectivesSelecting optimal hemodialysis access in elderly patients remains challenging, particularly in those requiring new options after failed initial access. We sought to describe the outcomes of redo hemodialysis access in elderly patients. MethodsAll patients aged ≥65 undergoing hemodialysis access placement from 2014-2019 were retrospectively identified in the electronic medical record. Characteristics and outcomes of those with initial versus redo access were compared. Patency was depicted utilizing Kaplan-Meier methods, with censoring at loss to follow-up or death, and unadjusted Cox regression. ResultsOverall, 211 elderly patients undergoing 257 procedures were included in the study. Of these, 116 (45.1%) were redo access procedures. There were no demographic or comorbidity differences between the two groups with the exception of central venous stenosis which was more common in the redo cohort (27.2% vs. 6.4%, P < 0.001). 91.5% of initial, vs. 60.3% of redo, procedures were arteriovenous fistulas (P < 0.001). Distribution of fistula type differed between the two groups with first time and redo procedures of 25.5% vs. 6.9% radiocephalic, 28.4% vs. 7.8% brachiocephalic, and 35.5% vs. 37.1% brachiobasilic respectively (P < 0.001). At 12 and 24 months, 63.6% and 44.0% of first-time accesses remained patent vs. 51% and 29.0% of redo accesses (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.80, P = 0.02). However, there was no difference in primary patency between redo grafts and fistulas (48.7% fistulas vs. 55.0% grafts at 12 months, P = 0.47). ConclusionsThese results demonstrate acceptable outcomes of redo access in elderly patients. There is no evidence from this study that prosthetic grafts are preferential, suggesting elderly patients with meaningful life expectancy who require redo access should be offered autogenous options when possible.

Long-term patency and comparisons of venous outflow in hemodialysis forearm arteriovenous grafts.

This retrospective study investigated the factors and the effects of different venous outflows on forearm arteriovenous graft patency. The venous outflow sites included basilic, cephalic, median antecubital, and deep veins. Comparisons among multiple groups were analyzed. A total of 179 patients with forearm loop arteriovenous grafts met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 72 were basilic, 48 were cephalic, 44 were median antecubital, and 15 were deep. The median observation period was 19 months. The survival rate was 84.9% at 24 months and 78.2% at 48 months. Primary, secondary, and assisted primary patency rates for all arteriovenous grafts were 48.9%, 72.4%, and 68.4% at 12 months; 13.8%, 33.9%, and 23.6% at 24 months; and 0.6%, 4.6%, and 2.3% at 48 months, respectively. Differences in primary patency were statistically significant compared with those of secondary and assisted primary patency (P < 0.05). Primary patency rates for cephalic, median antecubital, basilic, and deep were 47.9%, 48.6%, 47.7%, and 40.0% at 12 months and 12.5%, 13.9%, 22.7%, and 0% at 24 months, respectively. Secondary patency rates for cephalic, median antecubital, basilic, and deep were 75.0%, 69.4%, 75.0%, and 73.3% at 12 months and 39.6%, 30.6%, 38.6%, and 13.3% at 24 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in primary thrombosis among basilic, cephalic, median antecubital and deep. There were no significant differences observed in primary or secondary patency rates among all the groups. Stenoses in the venous anastomosis and outflow vein were frequently observed in all types of arteriovenous grafts. Central venous stenosis was most commonly seen in deep (26.67%). On average, 1.9 interventions per patient were performed on the graft to maintain function. Different venous outflow selections were not associated with long-term patency and the occurrence of thrombosis in hemodialysis forearm loop arteriovenous grafts.