Difference In Opioid Consumption Research Articles

Effect of intraoperative cold solution irrigation to reduce postoperative pain in knee osteoarthritis patients who underwent unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

PurposeTo compare the postoperative pain score, opioid consumption, and blood loss in knee osteoarthritis patients who underwent unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty with and without intraoperative cold solution irrigation.MethodIn total, 70 knee osteoarthritis patients were randomly included in the study and allocated into 2 groups. The first group was irrigated intraoperatively with a cold solution and the second group was irrigated intraoperatively with a room-temperature solution.ResultsThe cold solution group showed significantly lower pain scores (numerical rating scale, NRS) at 28 h postoperatively (p = 0.047). There were no significant differences in opioid consumption or blood loss between the groups.ConclusionsIntraoperative cold solution irrigation in unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty patients may provide the benefit of early postoperative pain reduction for up to 28 h but has no effect in terms of reducing opioid consumption or blood loss.Trial registrationThe trial was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) Trial registration number ID: TCTR20200706001 on 06/07/2020.

Single Shot Interscalene Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Non-Liposomal Bupivacaine in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Regional anesthesia is a valuable component of multimodal pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and multiple interscalene block anesthetic options exist, including non-liposomal interscalene bupivacaine (NLIB) and liposomal interscalene bupivacaine (LIB). The purpose of the current of study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption within 48 hours postoperative in those undergoing TSA with either LIB or NLIB. This was a retrospective cohort study at a single academic medical center including consecutive patients undergoing inpatient (>23-hour hospitalization) primary anatomic or reverse TSA from 2016 to 2020 who received either LIB or a NLIB for perioperative pain control. Perioperative patient outcomes were collected including pain levels and opioid usage, as well as 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmissions. The primary outcome was postoperative pain and opioid use. Overall, 489 patients were included in this study (316 LIB and 173 NLIB). Pain scores at 3, 6, 12, and 48 hours postoperatively were not statistically significantly different (p>0.05 for all). However, the LIB group had improved pain scores at 24- and 36-hours postoperative (p<0.05 all). There was no difference in the incidence of severe postoperative pain, defined as a 9 or 10 NRS-11 score, between the two anesthesia groups after adjusting for preoperative pain and baseline opioid use (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.57-2.74; p=0.57). Overall, 99/316 (31.3%) of patients receiving LIB did not require any postoperative opioids compared with 38/173 (22.0%) receiving NLIB; however, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for prior opioid use and preoperative pain (p=0.33). No statistically significant differences in postoperative total morphine equivalents or mean daily morphine equivalents consumed between the groups were found during their hospital stays (p>0.05 for both). Finally, no significant differences in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates were found (all p>0.05). LIB and NLIB demonstrated differences in patient reported pain scores at 24- and 36-hours post operation, although these did not reach clinical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption during the hospital stay, including opioid use, total morphine equivalents and daily mean morphine equivalents consumed during the hospital stay. Additionally, no differences were observed in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates.

Intravenous Methadone versus Intrathecal Morphine as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Pain and Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ObjectiveEvaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) methadone versus intrathecal morphine (ITM) within an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) pathway on postoperative pain and outcomes (length of hospital stay, postoperative complications) after cardiac surgery. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingTwo tertiary academic medical institutions within the same health system. ParticipantsEligible 289 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with an enhanced recovery pathway from January 2020 through July 2021. InterventionsPatients were administered ITM (0.25mg) or IV methadone (0.1mg/kg) if ITM was contraindicated. All patients were enrolled in an ERACS pathway utilizing current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery society guidelines. Measurements and Main ResultsPrimary outcome measures included postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption measured as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). We analyzed patient demographics, procedural factors, intraoperative medications, and outcomes. Adjusted linear mixed models were fit to analyze associations between intervention and pain outcomes. ITM was associated with decrease in pain scores on postoperative day 0 after adjusting for clinical variables (average marginal effect, 95% confidence interval; 0.49 (0.002, 0.977), p=0.049). No difference in opioid consumption could be demonstrated between groups after adjusting for postoperative day and other variables of interest. ConclusionsITM when compared to IV methadone was associated with decrease in pain scores without any difference in opioid consumption after elective cardiac surgery. Methadone can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to ITM for ERACS protocols. Future large prospective studies are needed to validate this finding and further improve analgesia and safety.

Investigation of efficacy of erector spinae plane block administered in different volumes on intraoperative opioid consumption and postoperative analgesia in breast surgery: Randomized, prospective, double-blind study.

We investigated the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block, which has been proven to be effective in breast surgery, on intraoperative opioid consumption and postoperative analgesia when administered in different volumes with the same concentration of local anesthetic. This study is designed as randomized, prospective, and double-blind. Seventy patients aged between 18-70 years, undergoing ASA I-III elective breast surgery, were included. Unilateral erector spinae plane block was achieved by administering 20 mL of 0.375% bupivacaine hydrochloride in 35 patients in Group I and 30 mL of 0.375% bupivacaine hydrochloride in 35 patients in Group II. The analgesic requirement of the patients was monitored with the surgical plethysmographic index throughout the surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, rescue analgesic requirements in the first 24 hours, and NRS scores at the 10th minute, 1st hour, 6th hour, 12th hour, and 24th hour postoperatively were recorded. Both intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumptions were similar between groups (p>0.05). The number of involved dermatomes was significantly higher in Group II (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between postoperative NRS scores (p>0.05). In elective breast surgery, erector spinae plane block administered at the same concentration in 20 or 30 mL volumes does not make a difference in opioid consumption and postoperative analgesia.

Patients' perception of the duration of analgesia provided by intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study

PurposeThe addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day.MethodsThis prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment.ResultsThe intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]), p=0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]), p=0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29], p=0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]), p=0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]), p=0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10], p=0.395).ConclusionIntrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics.

The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery (CAREFREE trial); a randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial

Study objectiveManagement of pain after foot and ankle surgery remains a concern for patients and healthcare professionals. This study determined the effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade, compared to standard of care, on overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. We hypothesized that usage of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care. DesignSingle center, randomized, non-inferiority trial. SettingTertiary hospital in the Netherlands. PatientsPatients were enrolled if ≥18 years and scheduled for elective inpatient foot or ankle surgery. InterventionPatients were randomized to ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade or standard of care. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the difference in OBAS, which includes pain, side effects of analgesics, and patient satisfaction, measured daily from the first to the third day after surgery. A non-inferiority margin of 2 was set as the upper limit for the 90% confidence interval of the difference in OBAS score. Mixed-effects modeling was employed to analyze differences in OBAS scores over time. Secondary outcome was the difference in opioid consumption. Main resultsPatients were randomized to standard of care (n = 22), or ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade (n = 22). Analyzing the first three postoperative days, the OBAS was significantly lower over time in the ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade group compared to standard of care, demonstrating non-inferiority (−1.9 points, 90% CI -3.1 to −0.7). During the first five postoperative days, patients with ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade consumed significantly fewer opioids over time compared to standard of care (−8.7 oral morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI -16.1 to −1.4). ConclusionsAmbulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care with single shot popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia.

Neuraxial clonidine is not associated with lower post-cesarean opioid consumption or pain scores in parturients on chronic buprenorphine therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Adequate post-cesarean delivery analgesia can be difficult to achieve for women diagnosed with opioid use disorder receiving buprenorphine. We sought to determine if neuraxial clonidine administration is associated with decreased opioid consumption and pain scores following cesarean delivery in women receiving chronic buprenorphine therapy. This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care teaching hospital of women undergoing cesarean delivery with or without neuraxial clonidine administration while receiving chronic buprenorphine. The primary outcome was opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) 0-6h following cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption 0-24h post-cesarean, median postoperative pain scores 0-24h, and rates of intraoperative anesthetic supplementation. Multivariable analysis evaluating the adjusted effects of neuraxial clonidine on outcomes was conducted using linear regression, proportional odds model, and logistic regression separately. 196 women met inclusion criteria, of which 145 (74%) received neuraxial clonidine while 51 (26%) did not. In univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in opioid consumption 0-6h post-cesarean delivery between the clonidine (8 [IQR 0, 15]) and control (1 [IQR 0, 8]) groups (P = 0.14). After adjusting for potential confounders, there remained no significant association with neuraxial clonidine administration 0-6h (Difference in means 2.77, 95% CI [-0.89 to 6.44], P = 0.14) or 0-24h (Difference in means 8.56, 95% CI [-16.99 to 34.11], P = 0.51). In parturients receiving chronic buprenorphine therapy at the time of cesarean delivery, neuraxial clonidine administration was not associated with decreased postoperative opioid consumption, median pain scores, or the need for intraoperative supplementation.

Skeletal Traction for Isolated Femur Fractures Does Not Reduce Opioid Consumption.

Isolated femoral shaft fractures can be treated preoperatively with skeletal traction (TXN) or maintenance of a position of comfort (COMF). The goal of this retrospective review was to determine whether preoperative opioid consumption differs significantly between these forms of treatment. Case-control retrospective study. Two academic Level 1 trauma centers. Patients presenting to the emergency department with isolated OTA/AO 32A-C femoral shaft fractures from 2017 to 2020. The primary outcome was preoperative opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents) comparing patients treated with application of TXN or placed in a position of COMF. Two hundred and twenty patients were studied (COMF n = 167, TXN n = 53). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significantly greater preoperative opioid consumption in the emergency department for the TXN group compared with COMF (2.6 more morphine milligram equivalents [confidence interval, 0.23-4.96], P = 0.031). There was no difference in preoperative opioid consumption between groups on the hospital floor ( P = 0.811) nor during the entire preoperative course ( P = 0.486). The total preoperative rate of opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents/hour) did not differ ( P = 0.825). Patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures treated preoperatively with skeletal traction consumed more opioids in the emergency department compared with patients treated in a position of comfort, but no difference in opioid consumption was observed between groups for the entire preoperative course. A position of comfort may be considered as an acceptable alternative to skeletal traction for patients with isolated femur fractures. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks for lower abdominal surgery.

Transversus abdominis plane blocks are an established method of postoperative analgesia for abdominopelvic surgeries. Liposomal bupivacaine is an extended-release formulation of bupivacaine providing up to 72 h of analgesia. This study aims to determine if transversus abdominis plane blocks performed with liposomal bupivacaine are associated with reduced opioid consumption and level of pain intensity compared to conventional bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution between December 2020 and December 2021. After institutional review board approval, we identified patients who underwent lower abdominopelvic surgery with transversus abdominis plane blocks done with liposomal or conventional bupivacaine and collected demographic, clinical, and procedural information for analysis. We compared total opioid consumption over 72-h postoperatively in milligram morphine equivalents (MME), frequency of opioid utilization, and average level of pain intensity between groups. These outcomes were also evaluated after adjusting for covariates. Data were presented as mean ± SD, median [IQR] or frequency (%), as appropriate; p < 0.05 was accepted as significant. A total of 178 patients met inclusion criteria, with 79 patients receiving an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine and conventional bupivacaine and 99 patients receiving conventional bupivacaine. The liposomal bupivacaine group had a median opioid consumption 72-h postoperatively of 47.5 [18-91.8] MME compared to 88 [43.8-160] MME in the conventional bupivacaine group, p = 0.045. Differences in opioid consumption between the groups did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, p = 0.11. There was no significant difference in frequency of opioid use or average pain intensity. Transversus abdominis plane blocks using an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine conventional bupivacaine are not associated with decreased opioid consumption or reduced pain up to 72 h following elective abdominopelvic surgery.

Laparoscopic vs. ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

The transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is effective for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, evidence regarding the optimal delivery method, either laparoscopic (L-TAPB) or ultrasound-guided (U-TAPB) is lacking. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these delivery methods. We carried out a literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to include randomized studies comparing patients receiving either L-TAPB or U-TAPB during minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption in the first 24h after surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB-2 tool. Effect size was estimated for each study with 95% confidence interval and overall effect measure was estimated with a random effect model. The literature search revealed 294 articles, of which four randomized trials were eligible. A total of 359 patients were included, 176 received a L-TAPB and 183 received a U-TAPB. We established the non-inferiority of L-TAPB, as the absolute difference of - 2.6 morphine-mg (95%CI - 8.3 to 3.0) was below the pooled non-inferiority threshold of 8.1 morphine-mg (low certainty level). No difference in opioid consumption was noted at 2, 6, 12, and 48h (low to very low certainty level). Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting were similar between groups at different timepoints (low to very low certainty level). No TAPB-related complications were recorded. Finally, the length of hospital stay was similar between groups. For postoperative multimodal analgesia both L-TAPB and U-TAPB may result in little to no difference in outcome in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Registration Prospero CRD42023421141.

Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block for postoperative pain in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Continuous adductor canal block (CACB) is almost a pure sensory nerve block and can provide effective analgesia without blocking the motor branch of the femoral nerve. Thus, the objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of CACB versus continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) on analgesia and functional activities in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to 3 October 2023) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CACB with CFNB in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Registration in the PROSPERO International prospective register of the meta-analysis was completed, prior to initiation of the study (registration number: CRD42022363756). Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias by quality assessment. Revman 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis and the summary effect measure were calculated by mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Eleven studies with a total of 748 patients were finally included. Pooled analysis suggested that both CACB and CFNB showed the same degree of pain relief at rest and at motion at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Compared with CFNB, CACB preserved the quadriceps muscle strength better (P<0.05) and significantly shortened the discharge readiness time (P<0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in opioid consumption, knee extension and flexion, timed up and go (TUG) test, or risk of falls between the two groups. Thus, Compared with CFNB, CACB has similar effects on pain relief both at rest and at motion and opioid consumption for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, while CACB is better than CFNB in preserving quadriceps muscle strength and shortening the discharge readiness time.

The influence of mental health on early outcomes following total hip arthroplasty.

Poor mental health is difficult to recognize and as a result, its association with recovery from total joint arthroplasty is difficult to assess. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between overall mental health scores and outcomes in the early postoperative period following unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data involving 142 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA. Independent variables included patient demographics and preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) scores as well as diagnoses of depression or anxiety. Dependent variables included length of stay (LOS), disposition at discharge, narcotic consumption until discharge, 6-week postoperative GPH, GMH and HOOS JR scores and magnitude of change compared to preoperative scores. Preoperative GMH and postoperative outcomes were compared using Pearson correlation coefficient, independent t-tests, Pearson's Chi-Square test, and univariate logistic regression. Patients with preoperative GMH scores below the 25% quartile were less likely to be discharged home and resulted in lower GPH, GMH and HOOS JR scores at 6-week follow-up compared to patients with preoperative GMH scores in the top 25% quartile. However, patients with low preoperative GMH scores demonstrated a greater magnitude of improvement in both the GPH and GMH scores compared to patients in the top 25% quartile. There was no difference in opioid consumption or LOS between either groups. When comparing patients with and without depression/anxiety, no difference was seen in any of the outcomes measured. Unilateral THA offers significant improvements in both physical and mental function to patients with hip osteoarthritis and poor mental health, though overall scores remain lower than in those with better mental health.

Pain Management, Functional Recovery, and Stress Response Expressed by NLR and PLR after the iPACK Block Combined with Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

This study aimed to investigate pain management, functional recovery, and stress response expressed by the neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) after the popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule infiltration (iPACK) block combined with adductor canal block (ACB) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial in a tertiary referral hospital. Three hundred and sixty-six patients were randomly allocated into the sham block group and iPACK combined with the ACB group. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. The secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, functional recovery expressed by a range of motion, and quadriceps strength. Also, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated. There were significant differences between the sham block and iPACK + ACB group in pain scores p < 0.0001 at all time points. Therefore, there was a significant difference in opioid consumption (p < 0.0001) and functional recovery (p < 0.0001). Also, NLR and PLR levels 12 h (p < 0.0001) and 24 h (24 h) after surgery (p < 0.0001) were much lower in the iPACK + ACB group. After total knee arthroplasty, the iPACK combined with ACB block group improved pain management, functional recovery, and stress response. Therefore, we strongly recommend this technique as a part of a multimodal analgesia protocol in knee surgery.

Gabapentin and postoperative pain and opioid consumption: A double-blind randomized controlled trial of perioperative pain management for sinus surgery

BackgroundThe link between post-operative narcotic prescription and opioid misuse has spurred a nationwide effort to reduce perioperative opioid use. Previous work has suggested that perioperative gabapentin may reduce post-operative pain and opioid consumption across different procedures, although the optimal regimen remains to be defined. MethodsChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with or without septoplasty were randomized to receive a 7-day pre- and post-operative course of placebo or gabapentin, starting at 300 mg daily and titrated to 300 mg three times daily, in a double-blind fashion. Primary endpoint was pain level using a validated visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included post-operative opioid consumption and side effects, as well as modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopy, Lund-Mackay, and SNOT-22 scores. ResultsAnalysis of 35 patients (20 gabapentin, 15 control) showed no significant difference in mean postoperative VAS (p = 0.18) or postoperative opioid consumption between the placebo and gabapentin groups (2.3 and 4.8 oxycodone tablets respectively, p = 0.18). 15 of 35 patients did not require any post-operative oxycodone tablets, and only two patients required more than six tablets. ConclusionPreliminary results show no significant change in pain after FESS with or without septoplasty in patients taking 7-day pre- and post-operative gabapentin versus placebo. Results also showed no significant difference in opioid consumption between the treatment and placebo groups. Post-operative pain scores and opioid requirements are both quite low following FESS. Many patients do not need opioids at all, suggesting that routine initial post-operative opioid prescriptions can be limited accordingly.

Is there any Synergistic Effect of Perioperative Use of Pregabalin in Addition to Naproxen in Ankle Fractures? A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Opioid-centric pain management strategies have created an epidemic of prescription opioid abuse in the United States. Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesic regimens have spotlighted as alternatives to decrease postoperative pain. However there has been little study of the synergistic effect between naproxen and pregabalin. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and long-term functional outcomes between perioperative uses of naproxen only and naproxen with pregabalin. Methods: This study was designed in 70 patients belonging to the 19 to 65 age group indicated for operative fixation of a rotatory ankle fracture under general anesthesia in 3 different hospitals. Group A received naproxen 500mg only, Group B received naproxen 500mg with pregabalin 75mg 2 hour before surgery and 12 hourly for 3 days thereafter. Minimal clinically important difference of visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was set 13 mm out of 100 mm. VAS for pain, opioid consumption, time for first use of escape injection, and any adverse effect were recorded at 6-, 12-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hour postoperatively. VAS for pain was checked at 2-, 6-week, 3-, and 6-month afterward and functional outcomes including Olerud and Molander score and ankle- fracture outcome of rehabilitation measure (A-FORM) were measured at 3-month and 6-month postoperatively. Results: Sixty-two patients (33 in Group A and 29 in Group B) completed follow-up until 6 months. Demographic data were similar between the 2 groups. VAS for pain scale was not significantly different between 2 groups at each time point until 6 months (P ≥ 0.520). Ninety-five percent confidential interval (CI) were within 13 mm at every time point except for at 6- and 12-hour postoperatively (95% CI -1.6 – 0.8, -1.4 – 1.0, each). There were no significant differences in opioid consumption, time for first use of escape injection, and functional outcomes between groups (P ≥ 0.163). Any adverse event at 48-hour postoperatively was significantly higher in Group B (P = 0.017). Conclusion: There was no clinically significant effect of perioperative use of pregabalin in addition to naproxen to reduce pain after operative fixation of rotatory ankle fractures. Rather it significantly raised adverse events after 48-hour postoperatively. Therefore additional use of perioperative pregabalin should be cautiously decided.

Regional Blocks Benefit Patients Undergoing Bilateral Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction, Even After Discharge.

There is limited evidence that regional anesthesia reduces pain in patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction. We sought to determine whether regional blocks reduce opioid consumption and improve post-discharge patient-reported pain in this population. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction with and without a regional block. We tested for differences in opioid consumption by block receipt using multivariable ordinal regression, and also assessed routinely collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for 10days postoperatively and tested the association between block receipt and moderate or greater pain. Of 754 patients, 89% received a block. Non-block patients had an increase in the odds of requiring a higher quartile of postoperative opioids. Among block patients, the estimated probability of being in the lowest quartile of opioids required was 25%, compared with 15% for non-block patients. Odds of patient-reported moderate or greater pain after discharge was 0.54 times lower in block patients than non-block patients (p = 0.025). Block patients had a 49% risk of moderate or greater pain compared with 64% in non-block patients on postoperative day 5. There was no indication of any reason for these differences other than a causal effect of the block. Receipt of a regional block resulted in reduced opioid use and lower risk of self-reported moderate and higher pain after discharge in bilateral mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction patients. Our use of PROs suggests that the analgesic effects of blocks persist after discharge, beyond the expected duration of a 'single shot' block.

The effectiveness of a transitional pain service in patients undergoing surgery with an increased risk of developing chronic postsurgical pain (TRUSt study). A randomized clinical trial

Study objectivePoorly controlled acute postsurgical pain is associated with delayed recovery, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), chronic opioid use and impaired functioning in daily activities. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of a transitional pain service (TPS) to improve quality of recovery for patients at risk of CPSP. We hypothesized that a TPS improves the quality of recovery in patients at risk of CPSP. DesignSingle-center, pragmatic, randomized, superiority trial. SettingTertiary hospital in the Netherlands. PatientsAssessed for eligibility if ≥18 years of age, undergoing elective surgery, and had an increased risk of developing CPSP. After being stratified for sex, 176 patients were included. InterventionPatients were randomized to receive TPS or standard of care (SOC). TPS was a multidisciplinary intervention providing a patient-tailored perioperative pain management plan, throughout all phases of surgery. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the difference in quality of recovery on the third postoperative day, measured by the Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include the between group differences in opioid consumption. Main resultsThe primary outcome was available in 169 (96.0%) patients. No difference between groups was found in QoR-15 on the third postoperative day (mean difference 2.0, 95% CI -5.5 to 9.4, p = 0.607). A decrease in opioid usage (compared to baseline) was observed in chronic opioid users, the median [IQR] reduction in total daily oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for TPS was −30 [−60, 0] at three and − 29.3 [−65.6, 0] at six months, whereas SOC had a median reduction of 0 [−56, 0] at three, and 0 [−60, 7.5] at six months. ConclusionsTPS did not significantly affect short-term quality of recovery but might improve long-term outcomes, such as the incidence of chronic pain, opioid consumption, and functioning in daily life. However, sample size in the present study was too small to provide solid evidence for this positive signal.

Can gabapentinoids decrease perioperative opioid requirements in orthopaedic trauma patients? A single-centre retrospective analysis.

Perioperative pain control in patients with orthopaedic trauma/extremity fractures has gained a lot of attraction from the scientific community in the last two decades. In addition to multimodal analgesia, the use of non-opioid drugs like gabapentinoids for pain relief is gradually finding its place in several orthopaedic subspecialties like spinal surgery, arthroplasty, and arthroscopic procedures. We envisage investigating the effectiveness of gabapentin in perioperative pain control in patients with extremity fractures undergoing surgical fixation. This was a retrospective comparative study conducted between January 2020 and January 2022. Patients with isolated fractures of the extremity involving long bones who were treated at our trauma centre, during the study period were divided into two groups based on the analgesics they received. Patients who received gabapentin and paracetamol were placed in group GP and those who received only paracetamol were assigned group NGP. Gabapentin was given in a single dose of 300mg 4h before surgery. Postoperatively, they were given 300mg 12 hourly for 2days. All patients in our trauma centre are usually managed with parenteral paracetamol administration pre and postoperatively. VAS score was calculated postoperatively at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48h. Patients requiring additional analgesics for pain relief were administered intravenous tramadol or a buprenorphine patch was applied. Patients in both groups were compared in terms of pain control, the additional requirement of opioid analgesics, and any adverse event related to medications. One hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled in the study. Out of 65 patients in the NGP group (non-gabapentin group), 74% of patients received additional opioid analgesics apart from paracetamol. Out of the 54 patients in the GP group (gabapentin group), only 41% required additional opioid analgesia for pain control. There was a significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups (p < 0.01). VAS scores were not significantly different between the two groups at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48h. Gender and fracture morphology did not affect opioid intake in the GP group. However, in the non-gabapentin group, there was a significant difference in opioid requirement in patients with intraarticular fractures (p < 0.01). Analgesic requirements vary from patient to patient depending on the injury's severity and surgery duration. However, there are no strict guidelines for pain relief in limb trauma surgeries which often leads to overuse and opioid-related complications or underuse and chronic pain. Gabapentinoids can supplement the analgesic effect of paracetamol in trauma patients during the perioperative period, decreasing the need for opioids.

A comparison of postpartum opioid consumption and opioid discharge prescriptions among opioid-naïve patients and those with opioid use disorder

Management of patients with opioid use disorder during the acute postpartum period remains clinically challenging as obstetricians aim to mitigate postdelivery pain while optimizing recovery support. This study aimed to evaluate postpartum opioid consumption and opioids prescribed at discharge among patients with opioid use disorder treated with methadone, buprenorphine, and no medication for opioid use disorder, as compared with opioid-naïve counterparts. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients who underwent delivery at >20 weeks' gestation at a tertiary academic hospital between May 2014 and April 2020. The primary outcome of this analysis was the mean daily quantity of oral opioids consumed after delivery while inpatient, in milligrams of morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included the following: (1) quantity of oral opioids prescribed at discharge, and (2) prescription for oral opioids in the 6 weeks after hospital discharge. Multiple linear regression was used to compare differences in the primary outcome. A total of 16,140 pregnancies were included. Patients with opioid use disorder (n=553) consumed 14 milligrams of morphine equivalents per day greater quantities of opioids postpartum than opioid-naïve women (n=15,587), (95% confidence interval, 11-17). Patients with opioid use disorder undergoing cesarean delivery consumed 30 milligrams of morphine equivalents per day greater quantities of opioids than opioid-naïve counterparts (95% confidence interval, 26-35). Among patients who underwent vaginal delivery, there was no difference in opioid consumption among patients with and without opioid use disorder. Compared with patients prescribed methadone, patients prescribed buprenorphine, and those prescribed no medication for opioid use disorder consumed similar opioid quantities postpartum following both vaginal and cesarean delivery. Among patients undergoing cesarean delivery, opioid-naïve patients were more likely to receive a discharge prescription for opioids than patients with opioid use disorder (77% vs 68%; P=.002), despite lower pain scores and less inhospital opioid consumption. Patients with opioid use disorder, regardless of treatment with methadone, buprenorphine, or no medication for opioid use disorder consumed significantly greater quantities of opioids after cesarean delivery but received fewer opioid prescriptions at discharge.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

What's New in Sports Medicine.