Difference In Median Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Durvalumab Following Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Differences in Survival Based on Age and Post-Progression Systemic Therapy.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by 1 year of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) durvalumab is standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes of (1) cCRT followed by durvalumab in patients older versus younger than 75 years of age and (2) post-progression treatment with ICI alone versus chemotherapy alone versus combined ICI and chemotherapy. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated between January 2018 and July 2023 with cCRT followed by durvalumab were identified retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from ICI start were analyzed in three cohorts aged < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression modelling of factors associated with OS was undertaken. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors of early durvalumab discontinuation for toxicity. Time from first salvage drug treatment to death (OS-2) was described. A total of 472 patients were analyzed: the proportions aged < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years were 34.3%, 42.8%, and 22.9%, respectively. Odds of early durvalumab discontinuation was 2.2-fold greater in the oldest (versus youngest) cohort. Age associated differences in median PFS (26.7months, 20.3months, and 14.2months; p< 0.001) and OS (60.8months, 44.4 months, and 27.6 months; p< 0.001) were observed. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with shorter OS were age ≥ 75years (versus < 65), performance status 2/3 (versus 0/1), stage IIIC (versus IIIA), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (per 7.43 unit increase), Charlson comorbidity index (per 1 unit increase), tumoral PD-L1 expression < 1% (versus ≥ 50%, 1-49%, or unknown), and squamous histology (versus non-squamous). Of 264 patients with disease progression, 48.5% received subsequent drug therapy. Median OS-2 was longer with ICI alone (9.9 months) or ICI-chemotherapy (11.8 months) than platinum doublet chemotherapy (6.7 months.) For recurrences < 6 months from the last durvalumab infusion, OS-2 were similar across treatment groups. In the studied cohort, OS was significantly shorter for patients ≥ 75 years of age treated with cCRT followed by durvalumab compared to those < 65 years. Post-progression systemic therapy was associated with modest efficacy, underscoring the need for new therapies.

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes for Intracranial Epidermoid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Predictors, Surgical Decisions, and Patient Clustering

IntroductionIntracranial epidermoid tumors (ETs) are rare, benign lesions that present significant challenges in neurosurgical management due to their propensity to encase vital neurovascular structures. ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of clinical, demographic, and tumor-specific factors on surgical decisions (gross total resection [GTR] vs. subtotal resection [STR]) and outcomes and identify patient clusters with distinct profiles and outcomes post-resection. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 72 epidermoid brain tumor patients treated from 1998 to 2022, employing multivariable logistic regression for GTR vs. STR predictors and Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival (PFS). K-prototype clustering classified patients based on clinical data. ResultsThe mean age of our cohort was 39.8±20.1 years. 13.9% of patients had a recurrence, with a median PFS of 108 months (IQR 57-206). Seizures significantly predicted GTR (p<0.05), whereas adherence to critical structures reduced GTR likelihood (p<0.05). Initial surgeries more often achieved GTR, correlating with longer PFS (p<0.0001) and reduced recurrence (p<0.01). History of previous ET surgery was predictive of increased recurrent tumor size (p<0.05) and reduced overall PFS (p<0.05). Clustering analysis revealed three clusters with significant differences in recurrence rates (p<0.0001), long term neurological deficits (p<0.05), PFS greater than 10 years (p<0.0001), and significant differences in median PFS between clusters 1 and 3 (p<0.0001) as well as 2 and three (p<0.01). ConclusionThis study emphasizes the importance of tailored surgical strategies in managing intracranial ETs, advocating for GTR to optimize long-term outcomes where possible. Future prospective studies are essential to further refine treatment approaches, enhancing survival for ET patients.

Less is more: An analysis of venetoclax and hypomethylating agent post-induction treatment modifications in AML

Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) enhances survival in elderly/unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, yet often necessitates regimen modifications due to intolerance. However, it is unclear how these modifications affect patient outcome. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the impact of post-induction HMA/Ven regimen modifications on disease progression and survival. This study reviewed 142 AML patients treated with HMA/Ven within the Northwell Health System from January 2019 to December 2022. To assess the impact of post-induction regimen modifications, patients were grouped according to median days between cycles (≤34 or ≥35 days cycle intervals) and median Ven days per cycle (≤14 or ≥15 days/cycle) based on only cycle 3 and beyond. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were employed for univariate and multivariate assessments, respectively. There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival (mPFS)(11.6 vs 11.8 months, p = 0.73) or median overall survival (mOS)(15.1 vs 21.8 months, p = 0.16) between cycle interval groups. However, there was a clinically and statistically significant advantage in mPFS (15.8 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.01) and mOS (24.7 vs 11.3 months, p = 0.006) for patients with a median of ≤14 Ven days/cycle compared to ≥15 Ven days/cycle. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ≤14 days of Ven for cycle 3 and beyond was an independent predictor of decreased mortality (HR 0.18, CI 0.07–0.48, p = 0.0007). Extended cycle intervals did not adversely affect mortality while reduced Ven duration per cycle post-induction was associated with improved survival in elderly AML patients.

Comparison of chemotherapy to chemo-immunotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) of mixed histology: A multi-institutional international retrospective study.

8602 Background: LCNECs are a rare subtype of lung cancer, with limited clinical trial data and an unclear consensus on first-line treatment. Even less is known about the optimal treatment approach for pts with mixed LCNECs, a pathologic subtype where tumors contain both LCNEC histology as well as features of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, or small cell lung cancer. Methods: We conducted an international multi-institutional retrospective analysis (n=13 institutions) of pts with advanced or metastatic mixed LCNECs who received 1st-line systemic therapy with either chemotherapy alone (chemo) or chemo-immunotherapy (chemoIO) between 2010-2023. Clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). Survival comparisons were made via the log-rank test. Results: Seventy-three pts with mixed LCNECs received either chemo (n=42, 57.5%) or chemoIO (n=31, 42.5%). The most common chemo regimens were carboplatin/etoposide (n=27) and cisplatin/etoposide (n=8), while the most common chemoIO was carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab (n=19). Median age at 1st-line therapy initiation was 65 (IQR: 60-72). 64% of pts were male (n=47). The majority were former smokers (n=41, 56.2%), with 22 current smokers (30.1%), and 10 non-smokers (13.7%). Mixed histologies included LCNEC/NSCLC (n=45, 56.2%), LCNEC/SCLC (n=17), LCNEC/carcinoid (n=1), and unspecified mixed LCNEC (n=10). Median PFS for chemo was 5 months (95% CI 2.7-9.2) vs. 6 months (95% CI 4.4-8.3) for chemoIO ( p=0.86). Median OS for chemo was 14.2 months (95% CI 10.4-22.5) vs. 17.2 months (95% CI 9.4-27.2) for chemoIO ( p=0.66). The ORR did not differ between chemo (n=18, 45%) and chemoIO (n=15, 48.4%) ( p=0.81). In the chemo group, 60% (n=25) experienced trAEs of any grade, with 23.8% (n=10) experiencing grade 3+ events and four requiring hospitalizations. For chemoIO pts, 61% (n=19) experienced trAEs, with 25.8% (n=8) experiencing grade 3+ events and six requiring hospitalizations. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3+ trAE for both chemo (n=5) and chemoIO (n=4). Overall, there were no significant differences between chemo or chemoIO groups for ORR ( p=0.81), all-grade trAEs ( p=0.88), grade 3+ trAEs ( p=0.84), PFS ( p=0.86), or median OS ( p=0.66). There were no significant differences in median PFS ( p=0.46) or OS ( p=0.99) for pts with mixed LCNEC/NSCLC vs. LCNEC/SCLC. Conclusions: For mixed LCNECs, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between first-line treatment with chemo vs. chemoIO, suggesting limited benefit from immunotherapy for these pts. Additionally, survival outcomes did not differ between mixed LCNEC/NSCLC and LCNEC/SCLC, suggesting a biology primarily driven by their neuroendocrine component.

Comparative efficacy of systemic sequential regorafenib after TACE combined with first-line targeted drugs (donafenib, sorafenib, or lenvatinib) after treatment failure for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, single-center, real-world study.

e16190 Background: Donafenib is a novel multikinase inhibitor, which is a 1st-line systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor and has been approved as the 2nd-line systemic treatment for advanced HCC based on the RESORCE trial. However, the efficacy of systemic sequential regorafenib after donafenib treatment failure in advanced HCC patients(pts) remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of advanced HCC pts treated with donafenib combined with TACE (Dona-TACE), sorafenib combined with TACE (Sora-TACE) or lenvatinib combined with TACE (Lenva-TACE) at The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 87 of these pts with advanced HCC who received regorafenib as the 2nd-line treatment. The 1st-line targeted drugs, disease control rate (DCR) (defined by the mRECIST), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) (defined by the CTCAE version 5.0) were recorded and compared. Results: After screening, 27 pts in the Dona-TACE group ,35 pts in the Sora-TACE group and 31 pts in the Lenva-TACE group were included in this study. The baseline characteristics of the three groups were similar. The median treatment duration of regorafenib was 5.2 months in the Dona-TACE group, 4.8 months in the Sora-TACE group and 3.7 months in the Lenva-TACE group. The overall DCRs of sequential regorafenib after donafenib, sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment failed were 79%, 75% and 71%(P&gt;0.05). There was no significant difference in median PFS of regorafenib (4.8, 3.9, 4.1m) in the Dona-TACE, Sora-TACE and Lenva-TACE groups. Compared with other groups, the Dona-TACE group received regorafenib sequentially had a lowest incidence of grade 3-4 AEs (39.1%, P&lt;0.05). All groups had no treatment-related deaths from regorafenib. Multivariate analysis showed that ECOG PS score, up-to-seven criteria, tumor blood supply and Extrahepatic metastasis were independent prognostic factors affecting PFS (HR, 3.220, 3.019, 2.753, 3.142; P &lt; 0.05). No survival differences were observed between the patients who received 1st-line treatment with or without a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) reagents. Conclusions: This retrospective, single-center, real-world study demonstrated that when donafenib failed the regorafenib could still improve the prognosis of advanced HCC pts with fewer AEs. The study will continue to focus on overall survival(OS) and whether combined ICIs or not in the 1st-line/ 2nd-line treatment could have a positive effect on OS.

68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT for staging and prognostic assessment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: comparison to [18F]FDG PET/CT.

To evaluate the prognostic performance of [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT at baseline for staging of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and to compare it with [18F]FDG PET/CT and the Revised-International Staging System (R-ISS). Patients who underwent [68Ga]Pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging were retrospectively included. Patient staging was performed according to the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system based on [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT images, and the R-ISS. Progression-free survival (PFS) at patient follow-up was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and compared using the log-rank test. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess predictive performance. Fifty-five MM patients were evaluated. Compared with [18F]FDG PET, [68Ga]Pentixafor PET detected 25 patients as the same stage, while 26 patients were upstaged and 4 patients were downstaged (P = 0.001). After considering the low-dose CT data, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients classified in each stage using [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT (P = 0.091). [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT-based staging discriminated PFS outcomes in patients with different disease stages (stage I vs. stage II, stage I vs. stage III, and stage II vs. stage III; all P < 0.05), whereas for [18F]FDG PET/CT, there was only a difference in median PFS between stage I and III (P = 0.021). When staged by R-ISS, the median PFS for stage III was significantly lower than that for stage I and II (P = 0.008 and 0.035, respectively). When predicting 2-year PFS based on staging, the AUC of [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT was significantly higher than that of [68Ga]Pentixafor PET (0.923 vs. 0.821, P = 0.002), [18F]FDG PET (0.923 vs. 0.752 P = 0.002), and R-ISS (0.923 vs. 0.776, P = 0.005). [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT-based staging possesses substantial potential to predict disease progression in newly diagnosed MM patients.

A retrospective study of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy versus TKI monotherapy in elderly patients with uHCC.

e16191 Background: The rising elderly population worldwide has led to an increase in cases of liver cancer among individuals aged ≥65 years. With the advancement of medical treatments, the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) now predominantly involves immunotherapy combination therapy. However, existing data in elderly patients are limited. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis on the efficacy and safety of immune combination therapy compared with TKI monotherapy in elderly uHCC patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on uHCC patients aged ≥65 years at the First Hospital of Jilin University between March 2019 and July 2023. The targeted therapy used in this study included, but not limited to, sorafenib, lenvatinib. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and atezolizumab were also utilized. Follow-up was conducted until death, loss to follow-up, or December 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs). Results: A total of 70 patients were included in this study, with 33 patients receiving monotherapy, and 37 patients receiving immune combination therapy. The median age was 68 years old, with 78.8% being male. The combination therapy group had a higher ORR (10.8% vs. 3.0%) DCR (48.5% vs. 45.9%) compared to the monotherapy group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in median PFS (7.0 vs. 12.0 months) and median OS (9.8 vs. 17.5 months) between the two groups. Among the subgroups, combination therapy showed better results except for patients with ascites. Immune combination therapy appeared to be superior to monotherapy in terms of both PFS (6.2 vs. 6.8 months, P = 0.888) and OS (6.8 vs. 10.2 months, P = 0.888). Multivariate analysis showed that elevated total bilirubin may be a risk factor for OS in patients ≥65 years old. Regarding safety, the adverse event (AE) rate was 39.3% in the monotherapy group. The most common AEs reported were abdominal distension (18.2%), fatigue (15.2%), and proteinuria (6.1%). In the combination therapy group, the AE rate was higher at 59.4%, with the most common AEs being thyroid function abnormalities (24.3%), fatigue(24.3%), decreased appetite(18.9%), and hypertension(18.9%). The rate of drug withdrawal due to adverse reactions was significantly higher in patients receiving combination therapy compared to those receiving monotherapy (40.5% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.008). Conclusions: In elderly uHCC patients (≥65 years old), immune combination therapy shows a higher ORR and potentially longer PFS and OS except patients with ascites. AEs and drug withdrawal rates are higher in the combination therapy group. Further discussions are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for elderly uHCC patients.

Abstract PO1-05-10: Clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: There is growing evidence indicating that human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low is a unique subtype of breast cancer that comprises a substantial share of patients historically classified as HER2 negative. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are important in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Whether HER2-low status or the level of HER2 gene amplification have prognostic significance for HR+/HER2-negative MBC patients treated with ET and CDK4/6i remains an area of active investigation. Methods: Patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2-negative MBC and who were treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib from 6/10/2015 to 12/28/2022 were selected from the Montefiore Health system database and followed until 3/24/2023. HER2-0 was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, and HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization negative by 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Median values were used to establish cutoffs for HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 gene copy number (GCN). Characteristics of the patients and tumors in the subgroups were compared using chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Kruskal-Wallis/Wilcox signed rank tests for continuous data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: 239 patients received CDK4/6i, with 46 HER2-0 and 193 HER2-low patients. There was no statistically significant difference in clinicopathological characteristics between both cohorts. No significant differences were observed in median OS (36 vs 34 months, P &amp;gt; 0.9) and median PFS (44 vs 35 months, P = 0.4) between HER2-0 and HER2-low patients. Adjusting for HER2 status, multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant association between HER2-low status and worse OS (HR: 1.03, P = 0.9) or worse PFS (HR: 1.37, P = 0.4). The median HER2/CEP17 ratio was 1.25 (Interquartile range (IQR): 1.18-1.39), and the median HER2 GCN was 2.58 (IQR: 2.10-3.18). Median OS (25 vs 37, P = 0.15) and median PFS (35 vs 37, P = 0.15) showed no significant differences between ratio-below vs above-median patients. However, patients with GCN-below-median had significantly worse OS (25 vs 37 months, P = 0.026), with no significant difference in median PFS (38 vs 35 months, P = 0.3). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant effect of GCN-below-median on OS (HR: 0.50, P = 0.022) but not on PFS. Conclusion: The clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6i is not influenced by HER2-low status; however, the extent of HER2 gene amplification may have a substantial impact on therapy responsiveness in MBC patients undergoing CDK4/6i treatment. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with MBC comparing HER2-0 vs HER2-low, above/below median HER2/CEP17 ratio, and above/below median HER2 GCN. Table 2. Median OS and PFS in patients with MBC comparing HER2-0 vs HER2-low, above/below median HER2/CEP17 ratio, and above/below median HER2 GCN. Table 3. Multivariable analysis of OS and PFS for patients with MBC comparing HER2-0 vs HER2-low, above/below median HER2/CEP17 ratio, and above/below median HER2 GCN. Citation Format: Frank Zhang, Jesus Anampa Mesias. Clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-05-10.

Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy after progression on prior palbociclib in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: A single center real-world study in China.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) become standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal therapeutic paradigm after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib with switching ET versus chemotherapy after progression on prior palbociclib-based ET in Chinese patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. From 414 consecutive patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who had been treated with palbociclib plus ET from September 2018 to May 2022 in Peking University Cancer Hospital, we identified 80 patients who received abemaciclib plus switching ET or chemotherapy after progression on palbociclib, matched for age, original stage at diagnosis, disease-free interval, and tumor burden at 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify clinical factors associated with PFS in the abemaciclib group. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.94-8.06) in abemaciclib group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.52-5.49) in chemotherapy group (p = 0.667). And, there was no difference in median PFS between the sequential and nonsequential arm (6.0 vs. 6.0 months) in the abemaciclib group though fewer lines of prior systemic therapy and longer PFS from prior palbociclib in the sequential arm. However, patients with prior palbociclib as the first-line therapy had a significantly longer median PFS versus prior palbociclib as ≥2nd-line therapy (11.0 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.043). Based on multivariable analysis, ER+/PR+ was an independent factor associated with longer PFS. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the abemaciclib and chemotherapy groups (p = 0.069). Our findings indicate that abemaciclib plus switching ET might be one of feasible treatment options for Chinese patients with HR+/HER2- MBC after progression on prior palbociclib-based therapy in addition to chemotherapy.

The Real-Life Impact of Primary Tumor Resection of Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-From a Clinical Oncologic Point of View.

The complex medical care of synchronous metastatic colorectal (smCRC) patients requires prudent multidisciplinary planning and treatments due to various challenges caused by the primary tumor and its metastases. The role of primary tumor resection (PTR) is currently uncertain; strong arguments exist for and against it. We aimed to define its effect and find its best place in our therapeutic methodology. We performed retrospective data analysis to investigate the clinical course of 449 smCRC patients, considering treatment modalities and the location of the primary tumor and comparing the clinical results of the patients with or without PTR between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018 at the Institute of Oncotherapy of the University of Pécs. A total of 63.5% of the 449 smCRC patients had PTR. Comparing their data to those whose primary tumor remained intact (IPT), we observed significant differences in median progression-free survival with first-line chemotherapy (mPFS1) (301 vs. 259 days; p < 0.0001; 1 y PFS 39.2% vs. 26.6%; OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.36-0.87)) and median overall survival (mOS) (760 vs. 495 days; p < 0.0001; 2 y OS 52.4 vs. 26.9%; OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.33-0.53)), respectively. However, in the PTR group, the average ECOG performance status was significantly better (0.98 vs. 1.1; p = 0.0456), and the use of molecularly targeted agents (MTA) (45.3 vs. 28.7%; p = 0.0005) and rate of metastasis ablation (MA) (21.8 vs. 1.2%; p < 0.0001) were also higher, which might explain the difference partially. Excluding the patients receiving MTA and MA from the comparison, the effect of PTR remained evident, as the mOS differences in the reduced PTR subgroup compared to the reduced IPT subgroup were still strongly significant (675 vs. 459 days; p = 0.0009; 2 y OS 45.9 vs. 24.1%; OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.18-0.79). Further subgroup analysis revealed that the site of the primary tumor also had a major impact on the outcome considering only the IPT patients; shorter mOS was observed in the extrapelvic IPT subgroup in contrast with the intrapelvic IPT group (422 vs. 584 days; p = 0.0026; 2 y OS 18.2 vs. 35.9%; OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.18-0.89)). Finally, as a remarkable finding, it should be emphasized that there were no differences in OS between the smCRC PTR subgroup and metachronous mCRC patients (mOS 760 vs. 710 days, p = 0.7504, 2 y OS OR 0.85 (95% CI 0.58-1.26)). The role of PTR in smCRC is still not professionally justified. Our survey found that most patients had benefited from PTR. Nevertheless, further prospective trials are needed to clarify the optimal treatment sequence of smCRC patients and understand this cancer disease's inherent biology.

Immediate Versus Deferred Systemic Therapy in Patients With Mesothelioma

BackgroundThe 2018 ASCO pleural mesothelioma (PM) treatment guideline states that “a trial of expectant observation may be offered” in patients with asymptomatic inoperable epithelioid mesothelioma with low disease burden. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes in PM-patients managed with initial observation and deferred treatment initiation. MethodsWe retrospectively collected clinicodemograhic and outcome data of patients with inoperable PM. Patients were assigned to 2 treatment decision groups: decision to start immediate systemic treatment (Immediate Treatment Group) versus observation and deferring treatment (Deferred Treatment group). ResultsOf 222 patients with advanced PM, systemic treatment was started immediately in the majority of patients (189, 85%; immediate group); treatment was deferred in 33 (15%) patients (deferred group); systemic therapy was chemotherapy-based in 91% and 79% respectively. Patients in the deferred group were older (70 vs 67 years, p = .05), less likely to have stage IV disease (28% vs. 51%, p = .08) and more often had epithelioid histology (90% vs. 70%, p = .03). Nineteen patients (58%) in the deferred group eventually received treatment.With a median follow-up time of 10.9 months median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 12.4 months and was significantly longer in the deferred group (20.6 months vs. 11.5 months, p = .02). No difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line treatment between groups was seen (5.4 and 5.3 months). ConclusionThis real-world analysis suggests that deferral of systemic therapy and close observation may not impact OS or physician-assessed PFS in selected PM-patients.

Analysis of the effect of baseline detection and early clearance of ct-DNA, on survival outcomes among patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

To determine if circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) dynamics of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in plasma can identify asubset of patients with EGFR-mutant (EGFR- m) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with inferior survival outcomes, we analyzed and compared survival outcomes among patients with and without baseline presence and early clearance of EGFR ct-DNA in plasma. For 66patients newly dia-gnosed with EGFR- m NSCLC, plasma samples were collected at baseline and 1st response assessment at 12-24weeks for extraction of ct-DNA. Estimation of ct-DNA (EGFR exons 18, 19, 20and 21) was done using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (dd-PCR) on the QX200ddPCR system (BioRad, USA). Patients with detectable EGFR ct-DNA at baseline (sample 1), with either undetectable or persistent detectable ct-DNA in sample 2were classified as clearers and non-clearers, respectively. Fifty-three patients received 1st/ 2nd generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and 13received either 3rd generation TKI (osimertinib) or chemotherapy plus gefitinib. The baseline ct-DNA-positive group had more patients with extra thoracic disease (60.4vs. 48.5%). For the entire cohort, there was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) among baseline ct-DNA-negative (13.57months) vs. ct-DNA-positive patients (12.32months) (HR 0.74). There was asignificant improvement of PFS among early ct-DNA clearers vs. non-clearers (12.32vs. 9.92months; HR 0.57). For those treated with 1st/ 2nd generation EGFR TKIs, this improvement in median PFS among early ct-DNA clearers vs. non-clearers was more apparent (11.76vs. 6.8months; HR 0.34). Baseline detection of the presence of ct-DNA of EGFR mutation in plasma was not predictive of first-line PFS, but is associated with extra thoracic disease. Patients with EGFR mutation and persistence of ct-DNA at first follow-up have worse PFS and overall survival (OS) in comparison to those clearing the same in plasma, especially among those treated with 1st/ 2nd generation EGFR TKIs.

Clinical characterization and therapeutic outcomes of patients (pts) with colorectal cancer (CRC) harboring somatic BRCA1/2 mutations.

134 Background: Somatic BRCA1/2 mutations in BRCA-associated cancers increase therapeutic sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapies and PARP inhibitors, but the implications of BRCA mutations in non- BRCA-associated cancers such as CRC is unknown and hypothesized to be shaped by tumor lineage. We thus conducted a retrospective analysis of outcomes with platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibition in pts with CRC, where the estimated prevalence of BRCA1/2 alterations is 3-4%. Methods: Pts with blood or tissue next generation sequencing (NGS) positive for a somatic BRCA1/2 variant and a diagnosis of CRC were identified from a single institution database. The pathogenicity of each mutation was annotated using public genomic databases (e.g. ClinVar). Pt characteristics were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Log-rank test was used for comparison of survival distribution among groups. Results: 8,258 NGS reports with a BRCA1/2 alteration from 1760 cancer pts were identified of which 189 (11%) had a diagnosis of CRC. 54/189 CRC pts (29%) had ≥1 pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant, 19 pts (10%) had ≥1 benign variant, and 134 pts (69%) had 1 ≥ variant of unknown significance (VUS); 26 pts (14%) had more than one BRCA1/2 variant. Pts with ≥1 pathogenic mutation (n=54) were more likely to have an inactivating DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutation versus pts with only benign/VUS BRCA1/2 variants (n=135) (20% vs 6%, p=0.004) while prevalence of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) (19% vs 13%, p=0.37) and Ras/Raf (53% vs 53%, p=1.00) were similar between groups. Median progression free survival (PFS) among 115 CRC pts (unselected for BRCA1/2 pathogenicity) who received an oxaliplatin-based regimen for advanced disease in the 1st line (n=52) was similar to the median PFS among pts who received an irinotecan-based regimen (n=63) (7.0 mths vs 7.0 mths, p=0.48). Median PFS with an oxaliplatin-based regimen in the 1st line among 52 pts with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants (n=13) was 5.1 mths vs 7.4 mths among pts with benign/VUS BRCA1/2 variants (n=39) (p=0.398). There were no significant differences in median PFS among pts with a pathogenic vs benign/VUS BRCA1/2 variants when the analysis was restricted to pts with BRCA1/2 variants identified in tissue (p=0.76) and to pts without co-occurring driver mutations (Ras/Raf, MSI-H, and/or POLE) (p=0.1). Overall survival in patients with advanced disease was similar between pts with a pathogenic (n=52) vs benign/VUS (n=122) BRCA variants (37.1 mths vs 45.1 mths, p=0.14). 6 pts (4 with pathogenic BRCA1/2 and 3 with VUS) received a PARP inhibitor after a median of 3 lines of treatment and the best response was disease progression in 6 pts (100%). Conclusions: In the context of CRC, somatic BRCA1/2 mutations frequently co-occur with pathogenic POLE mutations, but do not appear to confer therapeutic benefit to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors.

Differential efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors according to the types of EGFR mutations and agents in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

BackgroundBoth first and second-generation EGFR-TKIs are recommended in advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutations. However, there are few data on the difference in efficacy of EGFR-TKIs based on the type of EGFR mutation and agents.MethodsThis retrospective real-world study evaluated the outcomes and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the type of EGFR mutations, of 237 advanced NSCLC patients treated with first- or second-generation (afatinib) EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy.ResultsThe median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 11 months (M) and 25M, respectively. In the univariate analysis, patients with exon 19 deletion (del) (n=130) had significantly longer median OS compared to those with other mutations (L858R: 84, others: 23) (30 vs. 22 M, p=0.047), without a difference in PFS (p=0.138). Patients treated with afatinib (n=60) showed significantly longer median OS compared to those treated with first-generation TKIs (gefitinib: 159, erlotinib: 18) (30 vs. 23 M, p=0.037), without a difference in PFS (p=0.179). In patients with exon 19 del, there was no significant difference in median PFS (p=0.868) or OS (p=0.361) between patients treated with afatinib and those treated with first-generation TKIs, while significantly better PFS (p=0.042) and trend in OS (p=0.069) were observed in patients receiving afatinib in other mutations. Exon 19 del was independently associated with favorable OS (p=0.028), while age >70 years (p=0.017), ECOG performance status ≥2 (p=0.001), primary metastatic disease (p=0.007), and synchronous brain metastasis (p=0.026) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS.ConclusionsThe EGFR exon 19 del was associated with favorable OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, in patients with exon 19 del, first-generation TKIs seem to be a reasonable treatment option if osimertinib is unavailable.

Study on the comparison of postoperative liver injury caused by hepatic arterial perfusion chemotherapy combined with targeted immunotherapy with hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined with targeted immunotherapy for intermediate-and advanced-stage liver cancer

Objective: To compare the postoperative liver function injury condition in patients with intermediate-and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and hepatic artery chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Methods: Patients with intermediate-and advanced-stage HCC who were admitted and treated with HAIC/TACE+ICIs+TKIs therapy at Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University from January 2019 to November 2021, with follow-up up to July 2023, were retrospectively enrolled. The results of liver function tests within one week before interventional surgery and on the first day after surgery were recorded. The degree of postoperative liver injury was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0). The treatment efficacy was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Measurement data were compared between groups using a t-test or a non-parametric rank sum test. Enumeration data were compared between the groups using the χ(2) test or Fisher's exact probability method. The survival condition differences were analyzed by the log-rank method. Results: This study included 82 and 77 cases in the HAIC and TACE groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of gender, age, physical condition score, number of tumors, presence or absence of liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh grade, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and combined ICIs and TKIs . The HAIC group had later tumor staging, a greater tumor burden, poorer liver reserve function, and a larger proportion of patients in stage C (81.7% vs. 63.6%), χ(2)=6.573, P = 0.01). There were 53 cases (64.6% vs. 32.5%) with a maximum tumor diameter of ≥ 10cm, χ(2)=16.441, P < 0.001), and more patients had a retention rate of ≥ 10% for indocyanine green (ICG) at 15 minutes (68.3% vs. 51.9%, P = 0.035). The postoperative incidence rate of increased levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin was significantly lower in the HAIC group than that in the TACE group (28.0% vs. 63.6%, χ(2)=20.298, P < 0.001, 54.9% vs. 85.7%, χ(2)=17.917, P < 0.001;40.2% vs. 55.8%, χ(2)=3.873, P = 0.049). The number of patients with postoperative ALBI grade 3 was significantly lower in the HAIC group than that in the TACE group (6.1% vs. 16.9%, χ(2)=4.601, P = 0.032). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of postoperative hypoalbuminemia, activated partial thromboplastin time, or increased international standardized ratio between the two groups of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in median progression-free survival (7.3 months vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.296) or median overall survival (16.5 months vs. 21.9 months, P = 0.678) between the two groups of patients. Conclusion: The incidence rate of postoperative liver injury is higher in patients with intermediate-and advanced-stage HCC treated with TACE combined with ICIs and TKIs than in patients with HAIC combined with ICIs and TKIs.

Impact of Initial Timing of Metastatic Disease on Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors.

Patients with synchronous (de novo) metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer appear to have worse survival outcomes and shorter time to develop castration resistance than patients with metachronous disease. However, the impact of synchronous metastasis on outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) setting is unknown in patients without prior exposure to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). In this study, we assessed the impact of initial timing of metastasis (synchronous vs metachronous) on survival outcomes of patients with new-onset mCRPC in a real-world population treated with first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide. Data were collected retrospectively from 323 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of mCRPC who received ARPIs as first-line therapy and had no prior exposure to ARPIs. The study endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. The results showed that median overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with synchronous disease than those with metachronous disease (26 vs 38.7 months, HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86, P = .011). However, there was no difference in median progression-free survival. The initial presentation with synchronous metastasis remained an independent factor associated with shorter OS in the multivariable analysis. These hypothesis-generating data, after external validation, may have implications in patient counseling, prognostication, and design of future clinical trials in the new-onset mCRPC setting.

Clinical Impact of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in De Novo or PR- or Very Elderly Post-Menopausal ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancers.

The CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly increase progression-free survival (PFS) in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients. In clinical trials, overall survival (OS) improvement has been demonstrated for ribociclib and abemaciclib but not for palbociclib. We undertook a real-world evaluation of PFS and OS in 227 post-menopausal patients who received first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors. There is no significant difference in median PFS (27.5 months vs. 25.7 months, p = 0.3) or median OS (49.5 months vs. 50.2 months, p = 0.67) in patients who received either palbociclib or ribociclib, respectively. De novo disease is significantly associated with prolonged median PFS and median OS compared with recurrence disease (47.1 months vs. 20.3 months (p = 0.0002) and 77.4 months vs. 37.3 months (p = 0.0003), respectively). PR- tumours have significantly reduced median PFS and OS compared with PR+ disease (19.2 months vs. 38 months (p = 0.003) and 34.3 months vs. 62.6 months (p = 0.02), respectively). In the very elderly (>80 years), median PFS and OS are significantly shorter compared with patients who are 65 years or below (14.5 months vs. 30.2 months (p = 0.01), and 77.4 months vs. 29.6 months (p = 0.009), respectively) in the palbociclib group. Our data suggest that the benefit in the very elderly is limited, and PR+/de novo disease obtains the maximum survival benefit.

Effect of chemotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic genitourinary small cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective study

BackgroundGenitourinary small cell carcinoma is rare, and has a poor prognosis. However, effective treatment options for this disease are limited. We present a study to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic genitourinary small cell carcinoma (GSCC).MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GSCC from Jan 2013 to September 2022 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The survival and safety profiles were analyzed.ResultsForty-two GSCC patients were enrolled, which included 20 with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and 22 with chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up time was 15.13 months (95% CI, 8.84–21.42). The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy demonstrated no significant difference in median progression-free survival (p = 0.37). However, the median overall survival (OS) was 22.97 and 14.03 months with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively (HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.08–0.55, p = 0.017). Two patients with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy achieved clinical complete remission. The overall response rate for patients receiving chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy was 65%, which was higher in comparison to those treated with chemotherapy alone (50%). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy independently achieved favorable OS. Four patients experienced immunotherapy-related adverse events, with one developing grade 3 hypothyroidism.ConclusionsAmong patients with locally advanced or metastatic GSCC, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy might be thought of as a potentially effective treatment option for patients with GSCC.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Prognosis Analysis of Stage III-IV SMARCA4-deficient Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated by PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors plus Chemotherapy and Chemotherapy

The SMARCA4 mutation has been shown to account for at least 10% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the present, conventional radiotherapy and targeted therapy are difficult to improve outcomes due to the highly aggressive and refractory nature of SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC (SMARCA4-DNSCLC) and the absence of sensitive site mutations for targeted drug therapy, and chemotherapy combined with or without immunotherapy is the main treatment. Effective SMARCA4-DNSCLC therapeutic options, however, are still debatable. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and prognosis of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC. 46 patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC were divided into two groups based on their treatment regimen: the chemotherapy group and the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy group, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy assessment and survival analysis were performed in both groups, and the influencing factors for prognosis were explored for patients with SMARCA4-DNSCLC. Male smokers are more likely to develop SMARCA4-DNSCLC. There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (76.5% vs 69.0%, P=0.836) between chemotherapy and the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy or the disease control rate (100.0% vs 89.7%, P=0.286). The one-year overall survival rate in the group with PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy was 62.7%, and that of the chemotherapy group was 46.0%. The difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy group and the chemotherapy group was statistically significant (9.3 mon vs 6.1 mon, P=0.048). The results of Cox regression analysis showed that treatment regimen and smoking history were independent influencing factors of PFS in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC, and family history was an individual influencing factor of overall survival in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC. Treatment regimen may be a prognostic factor for patients with SMARCA4-DNSCLC, and patients with PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy may have a better prognosis.

Clinical efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: A real-world study in China.

e16119 Background: The therapeutic strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy is limited. There is a significantly unmet clinical need for effective treatment options for these patients. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of regorafenib alone or combined with a PD-1 inhibitor as a second or further-line treatment for patients with recurrent HCC after hepatectomy. Methods: Patients receiving regorafenib alone or combined with a PD-1 inhibitor in Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2019 to November 2022 were entered prospectively into a clinical database. Data were retrospectively analyzed. The major inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC; disease recurrence after radical hepatectomy; with tumor that cannot be re-resected; ECOG performance status score (PS) ≤2. Regorafenib was administered at the daily dose of 80-120 mg for more than 4 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The second outcomes included PFS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs). CTCAE v5.0 was used for evaluation of AEs. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled with a median age of 59. The hepatic function of all patients was mildly impaired (Child-Pugh A). Among all patients, 36.35% of cases were enrolled in Barcelona Clinic Liver Clinic (BCLC) A and the remainder were in BCLC B. Eight cases (36.36%) received regorafenib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor therapy and 14 cases received regorafenib treatment alone. Among all patients, 86.36% of the cases were treated with regorafenib as second-line therapy. Five patients (22.73%) had extrahepatic metastasis. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 11.66 (±10.20) months and 16.92 (±10.21) months, respectively. The 3-month PFS rate was 100%. The 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 75% (95%CI: 58.49%-96.70%) and 53.33% (95%CI: 34.88%-81.50%), respectively. The results showed a significant difference in median PFS between patients receiving regorafenib as second-line therapy and third-line therapy [12.30 months (95%CI: 4.25-20.36) vs 4.30 months (95%CI: 3.50-5.10); P&lt;0.001]. In addition, there is a significant difference in median PFS between patients with extrahepatic metastasis and those without extrahepatic metastasis [5.20 months (95%CI: 3.48-6.92) vs 18.20 months (95%CI: 5.09-31.31; P=0.003)]. The ORR and DCR were 18.18% and 81.82%. The most frequent AEs were hand-foot syndrome (40.91%), pain (18.18%), diarrhea (13.64%), and hypertension (13.64%). Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, with only 1 case having grade 3 AE. Conclusions: Regorafenib alone or combined with a PD-1 inhibitor showed significant clinical efficacy in controlling the disease progression of recurrent HCC.