Difference In Lymph Node Yield Research Articles

Study International Multicentric Pancreatic Left Resections (SIMPLR): Does Surgical Approach Matter?

Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly preferred for left-sided pancreatic resections. The SIMPLR study aims to compare open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches using propensity score matching analysis. This study included 258 patients with tumors of the left side of the pancreas who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2020 at three high-volume centers. The patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical approach and matched in a 1:1 ratio. The open group had significantly higher estimated blood loss (620 mL vs. 320 mL, p < 0.001), longer operative time (273 vs. 216 min, p = 0.003), and longer hospital stays (16.9 vs. 6.81 days, p < 0.001) compared to the laparoscopic group. There was no difference in lymph node yield or resection status. When comparing open and robotic groups, the robotic procedures yielded a higher number of lymph nodes (24.9 vs. 15.2, p = 0.011) without being significantly longer. The laparoscopic group had a shorter operative time (210 vs. 340 min, p < 0.001), shorter ICU stays (0.63 vs. 1.64 days, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stays (6.61 vs. 11.8 days, p < 0.001) when compared to the robotic group. There was no difference in morbidity or mortality between the three techniques. The laparoscopic approach exhibits short-term benefits. The three techniques are equivalent in terms of oncological safety, morbidity, and mortality.

Surgeon age in relation to patients' long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: nationwide population-based cohort study.

Increasing surgeon age may influence patient outcomes after complex procedures due to gained experience but also decreased technical and cognitive abilities. This study aimed to clarify whether surgeon age influences patients' long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Population-based cohort study including all patients who underwent open and curatively intended gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2015 in Sweden, with follow-up throughout 2020. Surgeon age, categorized into three equal-sized groups (tertiles), was assessed in relation to 5-year all-cause mortality rate (main outcome) and 5-year disease-specific death (secondary outcome) using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for patient age, sex, education, co-morbidity, pathological tumour stage, tumour sublocation and neoadjuvant therapy. Lymph node yield, resection margin status, in-hospital complications and annual surgeon volume of gastrectomy were considered potential mediators. Among 1647 patients, the 5-year all-cause mortality rate was increased for surgeon age ≥55 years (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% c.i. 1.04 to 1.41) and borderline elevated for age 47-54 years (HR 1.16, 95% c.i. 0.99 to 1.36), compared with age ≤46 years. Five-year disease-specific death was increased for surgeon age ≥55 years (HR 1.25, 95% c.i. 1.06 to 1.48) and 47-54 years (HR 1.22, 95% c.i. 1.02 to 1.44), compared with age ≤46 years. The associations attenuated and became statistically non-significant after adjustment for lymph node yield, resection margin status and complications. Surgeon age ≥47 years might be associated with worse long-term survival in patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma, possibly mediated in part by differences in lymph node yield, resection margin status and complications.

High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancer Resection: Rates of Success and Outcomes.

High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, defined as ligation before the takeoff of the left colic artery, is often described as the gold standard in low left-sided colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study is to quantify the rate of ligation at the described level at a single academic center. Additionally, we examined the relationship between level of ligation and cancer-related outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included patients ages 18 and over with low left-sided colon, rectal, and anal cancers undergoing surgical resection. Radiographic evidence of high ligation was defined as ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery before the takeoff of the left colic artery. Patients with and without radiographic evidence of high ligation on CT were compared. Secondary outcomes include lymph node yield and positivity, need for adjuvant therapy, and time from surgery to adjuvant therapy. 169 patients (54% male) were included in the study. 61.5% of operative reports described high ligation of the IMA. There was radiographic evidence of high ligation in 55.6% of total patients and in 70.2% of patients where high ligation was intended. There was no significant difference in surgeon experience, surgical procedure, or surgical approach. There was no difference in lymph node yield, time to adjuvant chemotherapy, or recurrence rates. This study demonstrates good technical success rate of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery but shows no difference in short-term patient-measured outcomes between high and low ligation (or successful and unsuccessful high ligation).

Does robotic TME bring difference in lymph node yield and quality of TME?

Oncological outcomes of the robotic low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) are still under discussion. Few studies have proven that robotic TME (rTME) is a safe and equivalent method for treatment of rectal carcinoma. But there is almost no comparison between the rTME and conventional TME in terms of the number of lymph nodes obtained and the quality of the TME. A single institution retrospective study was designed in a cohort of 261 patients. Cohort was divided into two groups depending on the type of surgery (rTME versus TME) and within these two groups, patients were divided according to whether they underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCHRT) or did not. The primary objective of the study was to compare obtained number of the lymph nodes in specimen. Secondary objectives were comparison of the quality of the TME and the number of positive circumferential resection margins. Results of the study have shown no significant difference in number of the lymph nodes obtained by the rTME and TME. There was no difference in the quality of the TME, neither in the group with the previous nCHRT nor in the group without a nCHRT. With results from the study we consider the rTME to be non-inferior to the conventional TME. Therefore, at least identical oncological results can be expected in patients treated by the rTME.

Evaluating Axillary Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

The benefits that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) provides in treating patients with breast cancer are well known. However, its effects on axillary lymph nodes and lymph node yield (LNY) following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remain unclear. Given the importance of LNY for accurate axillary staging in patients with breast cancer, we retrospectively reviewed a large national cancer database to determine if NAC has an effect on LNY following axillary surgery. A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database was performed. Patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 with T0-T4, clinical N0-3, and M0 breast cancer who underwent ALND were included. Patients were categorized by NAC and primary surgery (PS). A descriptive analysis of patient and tumor characteristics, as well as extrinsic factors, was performed. A univariate analysis using Student's t-test was performed to evaluate LNY between the two groups. A total of 118,108 patients were included in our study. We found that 29,066 (24.6%) patients underwent NAC, and 89,042 (75.4%) had surgery as initial treatment (PS group). The median LNY by ALND in the NAC group was 11 (Q1, Q3: 6, 16). The median LNY in the PS group was 11 (Q1, Q3: 6, 17), p < 0.001. Despite differences in patient characteristics and external factors, we found no difference in LNY following ALND between patients who underwent NAC and those who had initial surgery. Efforts should be made to achieve equivalent LNY whether or not patients receive NAC.

TU2.10 Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Lymph Node Yield and Positivity in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancers

Abstract Background The status of lymph node metastasis is a key factor for predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancers. Aims We aimed to find any significant difference in lymph node yield (LNY) between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS). We aimed to identify any statistical correlation between LNY and lymph node positivity (LNP) with other patient, surgical and histopathological features. Methodology This is a retrospective, non-interventional review of consecutive patients who underwent left-sided colonic and rectal cancer resections over a three-year period between 01 April 2018 and 31 March 2021. Results A total of 102 patients were included in the study. LNY ranged between one and 43 nodes (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 17, 8). There was no statistically significant difference in LNY between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) (p=0.1449). Significant statistical correlation was identified between LNP and completeness of resection (CoR) (p=0.039), vascular invasion (VI) (p&amp;lt;0.001), perineural invasion (PI) (p&amp;lt;0.001), and circumferential resectional margin involvement (CRMI) (p=0.039). Discussion LNY and LNP are important prognostic indices in colorectal cancer. Patient age, tumor location, the urgency of surgery, and consultant experience did not significantly impact the LNY. Our study showed a positive correlation between LNP and CRMI, VI and PI comparable to literature. Contrary to other studies, we found no statistical significance between LS vs. OS and LNY. Whether 12 nodes per patient is an appropriate level remains controversial.

Assessing the histopathology reports of colorectal carcinoma surgery: An audit of three years with emphasis on lymph node yield.

A comprehensive histopathology report of colorectal carcinoma surgery is important in cancer staging and planning adjuvant treatment. Our aim was to review histopathology reports of operated specimens of colorectal carcinoma in our institution between 2013 and 2015 to assess different histological parameters, including lymph node yield, and to evaluate compliance to minimum data sets. After approval by the institutional review board (IRB), we analyzed 1230 histopathology reports of colorectal carcinoma between 2013 and 2015. Various gross and microscopic findings (along with age, sex) were noted, for example, specimen type, tumor site, resection margins including circumferential resection margin (CRM), lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pTNM stage, lymph node yield, etc. Out of 1230 patients, 826 (67.15%) were men and 404 (32.85%) were women. The overall mean age was 52 (range: 18 - 90) years. There were 787 surgeries for rectal cancers. All reports commented on the type of specimen, tumor size (mean = 4.38 cm), proximal, and distal margins. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and the pT stage were mentioned in 98.06% and 99.84%, respectively. The overall mean lymph node yield was 18.38 (median = 15, range = 0-130 lymph nodes). A statistically significant difference in lymph node yield was detected between rectal and colonic cancer patients (14.79 and 27.26); post neoadjuvant therapy (NACT) cases, and NACT naive cases (13.51 and 25.11); and high tumor stage and low tumor stage disease (20.60 and 15.22). Not commenting on extramural vascular emboli, tumor budding, and CRM in non-rectal cancer cases were the lacunae. Our compliance with minimal data sets is satisfactory. The overall mean lymph node yield was 18.38 (median = 15). Extramural vascular emboli, tumor budding need to be captured.

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Lymph Node Yield and Positivity in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancers.

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide and is the third most common cause of cancer deaths in the UK. The status of lymph node metastasis is a key factor for predicting the prognosis of a patient's CRC.AimsThis study aimed to analyze the demographics of left-sided colonic and rectal cancers at a single institution. We looked closely at the correlation between patient age and various histological factors. We tried to find any significant difference in lymph node yield (LNY) between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS). We aimed to identify any statistical correlation between LNY and lymph node positivity (LNP) with other patient, surgical and histopathological features.MethodologyThis is a retrospective, non-interventional review of consecutive patients who underwent left-sided colonic and rectal cancer resections over a three-year period between 01 April 2018 and 31 March 2021. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used. Chi-squared / Fisher exact test was used on a categorical scale between two or more groups and non-parametric setting for qualitative data analysis.ResultsA total of 102 patients were included in the study. No statistical correlation was found between the age of the patient with the LNY, LNP, location of the tumor, type, and urgency of the operation. LNY ranged between one and 43 nodes (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 17, 8). There was no statistically significant difference in LNY between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) (p=0.1449). Significant statistical correlation was identified between LNP and completeness of resection (CoR) (p=0.039), vascular invasion (VI) (p<0.001), perineural invasion (PI) (p<0.001), and circumferential resectional margin involvement (CRMI) (p=0.039).DiscussionLNY and LNP are important prognostic indices in colorectal cancer. Patient age, tumor location, the urgency of surgery, and consultant experience did not significantly impact the LNY. Our study showed a positive correlation between LNP and CRMI, VI and PI comparable to literature. Contrary to other studies, we found no statistical significance between LS vs. OS and LNY. Whether 12 nodes per patient is an appropriate level remains controversial.

Optimal Lymph Node Yield for Survival Prediction in Rectal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

PurposeA lymph node (LN) yield ≥12 is required to for accurate determination of nodal status for colorectal cancer but cannot always be achieved after neoadjuvant therapy. This study aims to determine the difference in LN yield from rectal cancer patients treated with and without neoadjuvant therapy and the effects of specific LN yields on survival.Patients and MethodsThe study cohort included a total of 4344 rectal cancer patients treated between January 2007 and December 2015, 2260 (52.03%) of whom received neoadjuvant therapy. Data were retrieved from the Taiwan nationwide cancer registry database. The minimum acceptable LN yield below 12 was investigated using the maximum area under the ROC curve.ResultsThe median LN yield was 12 (8–17) for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and 17 (13–24) for those who did not. The recommended LN yield ≥12 was achieved in 82.73% of patients without and 57.96% of those with neoadjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). Patients with LN yield ≥12 had a higher OS probability than did those with LN <12 (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06–1.66; p = 0.0124). However, the predictive accuracy for survival was greater for LN yield ≥10 (AUC, 0.7767) than cut-offs of 12, 8, or 6, especially in patients with pathologically-negative nodes (AUC, 0.7660).ConclusionNeoadjuvant therapy significantly reduces the LN yield in subsequent surgery. A lower yield (LN ≥ 10) may be adequate for nodal evaluation in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resections for rectal and rectosigmoid cancer: an institutional experience.

Colorectal surgery has evolved with the advent of laparoscopic techniques and now robotic-assisted surgery. There is significant literature supporting the use of laparoscopic techniques over open surgery with evidence of enhanced post-operative recovery, reduced use of opioids, smaller incisions and equivalent oncological outcomes. Robotic minimally invasive surgery addresses some of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, providing surgical precision and improvements in perception and dexterity with a resulting decrease in tissue damage. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent robotic-assisted anterior resection for cancer of the rectum or rectosigmoid junction in our institution since our robotic programme began in 2017. Patient demographics were identified via electronic databases and patient charts. A matched cohort of laparoscopic cases was identified. A total of 51 consecutive robotic-assisted anterior resections were identified and case matched with laparoscopic resections for comparison. Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a shorter length of stay (p = 0.04), reduced initial post-operative analgesia requirements (p < 0.01) and no significant difference in time to bowel movement or stoma functioning (p = 0.84). All patients had an R0 resection, and there was no statistical difference in lymph node yield between the groups (p = 0.14). Robotic surgery was associated with a longer operative duration (p < 0.001). In this early experience, robotic surgery has proven feasible and safe and is comparable to laparoscopic surgery in terms of completeness of resection and recovery. As costs and operating times decline and as technology progresses, robotic surgery may oneday replace traditional laparoscopic techniques.

Variation in Lymph Node Yield After Radical Cystectomy.

To test the hypothesis that lymph node yield will vary by pathology assistant (PA) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). This is a single-institution retrospective review that included patients who underwent an RC with PLND for bladder cancer from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2018. Predicted mean lymph node counts were generated using multivariable regression analysis. In a total of 430 patients who underwent RC with PLND, the median lymph node count (interquartile range) was 15.0 (11.0-21.0). The frequency of the limits of lymphadenectomy was as follows: external iliac, internal iliac, and obturator (true pelvis) (33.3%); true pelvis plus common iliac to the level of the aortic bifurcation (47.9%); and inferior mesenteric artery (18.8%). On descriptive analysis, there were differences in lymph node yield when evaluating the following variables: level of dissection, clinical stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical approach, surgeon, pathologist, and PA (P < .05). On multivariable analysis, adjusted lymph node counts varied between surgeons, pathologists, clinical stage, and level of dissection but not by PA (P = .18). Lymph node yield after RC varies on several known levels, including surgeon, extent of lymphadenectomy, clinical stage, and pathologist. This study found no significant variation in lymph node yield according to PA.

Abstract B40: Trends in lymph node yield for neck dissection and oral cavity carcinoma survival

Abstract Objectives: Lymph node yields (LNYs) following neck dissection have been associated with differences in oral cavity cancer survival. The objective of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in LNYs in neck dissections for oral cavity carcinoma. Methods: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER 18) database. Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of malignant oral cavity cancer (tongue and floor of mouth) squamous cell carcinomas diagnosed from January 1, 2006-December 31, 2016. Patients with AJCC 6th Edition Stages 1-4a who underwent surgery were included. All-cause age-adjusted mortality for tongue and floor of mouth cancers during this period was assessed using SEER*Stat. Results: The median LNY among 8,580 patients in the sample was 25 LNs (Interquartile range 14-39). LNY statistically increased over time from 22 LNs in 2004 to 27 in 2014 (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). In contrast, there was no change in the median number of positive LNs during the same period (median 2 positive LNs in 2004 and 2014). There was no significant difference in lymph node yield based on sex, region, insurance status, or relative location to a metropolitan center. After adjusting for patient age, sex, race, marital status, regional income, and percent current smokers in the county of residence, tumor subsite and TNM stage, LNY less than 18 was independently associated with a 44% greater risk of death from any cause, compared with greater LNYs (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29-1.60, p=.0001). During this period, all-cause age-adjusted mortality declined from 469.7 per 100,000 (468.2-471.2) to 429.0/100,000 (428.2-430.8). Conclusion: LNY following neck dissection for oral tongue and floor of mouth cancers increased significantly over a decade, during which survival also improved. The cause of improved LNY is not known but may nevertheless be contributing to declining mortality in patients with oral tongue and floor of mouth cancers. Citation Format: Punam Patel, Suraj Kedarisetty, Miriam Lango. Trends in lymph node yield for neck dissection and oral cavity carcinoma survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Optimizing Survival and Quality of Life through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2019 Apr 29-30; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(12_Suppl_2):Abstract nr B40.

Alternative approaches to retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes based on surgical approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PT-RMS). MethodsPatients undergoing RPLND for PT-RMS over 10 years at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Length of stay (LOS), complications, oral morphine equivalents per kilogram (OME/Kg), lymph node yield, and time to chemotherapy were assessed. The surgical approaches compared were: open transabdominal, open extraperitoneal, laparoscopic, and retroperitoneoscopic. For cases with lymphatic mapping, indocyanine green (ICG) was injected into the spermatic cord. ResultsTwenty patients were included: five open transabdominal, six open extraperitoneal, three laparoscopic, and six retroperitoneoscopic operations. LOS was shorter in the retroperitoneoscopic group than laparoscopic (p = 0.029) and both open groups (p < 0.001). Mean OME/kg used was lowest in the retroperitoneoscopic (0.13 ± 0.15) group compared to laparoscopic (0.68 ± 0.53, p = 0.043), open transabdominal (14.90 ± 8.87, p = 0.003), and extraperitoneal (10.11 ± 2.44, p < 0.001). Time to chemotherapy was shorter for retroperitoneoscopic patients (0.13 days ± 0.15) compared to open transabdominal (15.6 days±6.5, p = 0.005). There was no difference in lymph node yield between groups. Spermatic cord ICG demonstrated iliac lymph node avidity on near-infrared spectroscopy. ConclusionsMinimally invasive RPLND appears to offer a faster recovery without compromising lymph node yield for patients with PT-RMS. Level of EvidenceIII.

PD43-02 THE IMPACT OF CASE ORDER ON POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

PD43-02 THE IMPACT OF CASE ORDER ON POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

Comparison of Peri-operative and Early Oncological Outcomes of Robot-Assisted vs. Open Salvage Lymph Node Dissection in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Introduction: Salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) has been proposed as a treatment option for prostate cancer patients with lymph node (LN) recurrence following radical prostatectomy to delay or avoid palliative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Historically sLND has been performed using an open approach, with its associated morbidity. A limited number of studies have reported peri-operative outcomes following robot-assisted sLND. However, a direct comparison with the open approach has hitherto not yet been reported. This study investigates whether robot-assisted sLND is associated with better peri-operative outcomes compared to the open approach. Early oncological outcomes are also compared.Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, clinical data were collected from 60 patients undergoing open sLND between 2010–2016 and 30 patients undergoing robot-assisted sLND between 2016 and 2018 at our tertiary referral center. The primary objective of the study was to compare peri-operative outcomes (length of stay, estimated blood loss, operative time, intra-operative, and postoperative complications) and LN yield between both procedures. As secondary objective early oncological outcome [biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and clinical recurrence-free survival (CRFS)] was compared. Variables of interest were compared using the chi-squared test (categorical variables), two sample t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test (continuous variables). To compare BRFS and CRFS, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank tests were performed.Results: Robotic sLND was associated with reduced blood loss (median 100 vs. 275cc; p < 0.0001) and shorter length of stay (median 2 vs. 7 days; p < 0.0001) compared to open sLND. Moreover, postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery were more prevalent in the open sLND group compared to the robotic group (41.6% vs. 20%, p = 0.04). No significant differences in LN yield (for each sLND template), BRFS, and CRFS were detected between both groups.Conclusion: Robot-assisted sLND is associated with significantly reduced peri-operative morbidity compared to open sLND. No difference in LN yield, BRFS and CRFS was seen between both groups. Modern imaging techniques underestimate the tumor burden and therefore, the surgical sLND template should not be limited to the positive spots on pre-operative imaging.

Radiation Therapy Impact on Lymph Node Yield in Patients With Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

A lymph node yield (LNY) over 20 is considered a quality metric for lateral neck dissection to ensure an oncologic representative sample. Anecdotally, however, LNY in patients undergoing neck dissection after radiation therapy (RT) is lower due to atrophy and fibrosis. To determine whether preoperative RT decreases LNY in patients with laryngeal cancers undergoing surgery. Medical record database was queried for patients presenting between 2006 and 2015 with laryngeal cancer. Tabulation was made for location (glottic/supraglottic), stage, and side for the total number of lymph nodes between primary surgery and RT (salvage surgery) groups. Descriptive analysis and a paired Student t test were used for statistical analysis. Fifty-nine patients were included in the study for a total of 98 neck dissections. Twenty-six (44%) patients had primary surgery, and 33 (56%) patients had salvage surgery. The mean left and right total LNY in the salvage surgery group was 27.6 and 29.5, respectively, and 32.2 and 33.7 for the primary surgery group. A difference of 4.5 (left) and 4.3 (right) in LNY between the salvage surgery and primary surgery group was found. A Student t test showed no statistically significant difference in LNY between both groups when analyzed per site (glottic and supraglottic), side, and stage (III-IV). Although patients with prior RT had a lower mean of LNY, our results did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference. Further studies with a larger number of patients are recommended.

Évaluation de la courbe d’apprentissage de la cystectomie radicale laparoscopique pour cancer : morbidité et résultats oncologiques

The objective of this work was to evaluate the impact of the laparoscopic radical cystectomy learning curve on perioperative and oncological outcomes. This is a retrospective and single-center study of all patients who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer from February 2007to March 2016, (93patients) Perioperative and oncological data were collected. We used mixed statistical models to predict the number of patients needed in the learning phase. We compared the perioperative parameters of the patients in the learning phase with those of the rest of the patients. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Thirty-six patients are required for the learning phase (P1). The expertise phase begins after the 36th LRC (P2). In both phases, there was no significant difference in age, ASA score, and tumor stage (P=0.237, P=0.577, P=0.998). Mean operative time was 328.3min and 262.4min in P1and P2 (P=0.0001), mean blood loss was 333.7mL and 194.3mL in P1and P2respectively (P=0.0003). The rate of major complications was high in the learning phase (P=0.042). There was no significant difference in lymph node yield, positive surgical margins and overall survival (P=0.068, P=0.194, P=0.703). This learning experience was evaluated without compromising oncological results, but with a significantly higher rate of major complications. 3.

Open versus laparoscopic portal lymphadenectomy in gallbladder cancer: is there a difference in lymph node yield?

BackgroundGallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy. Because it commonly metastasizes via lymphatics, portal lymphadenectomy should be included in oncologic resections. This study aimed to compare the oncologic equivalence of the laparoscopic versus open technique by evaluating lymph node (LN) yield. MethodsThe 2010–2012 National Cancer Data Base identified patients who underwent laparoscopic or open resection of GBC with dedicated lymphadenectomy. LN yield was compared by resection method. Variables associated with LN yield ≥3 were identified. ResultsOf 1524 patients identified, 52% were intended to undergo laparoscopic surgery, with 20% of these patients converted to open. Collection of ≥3 LNs following open resection (47%) was higher than for laparoscopic resection (34%), p < 0.001. Operations performed at high-volume (aOR:1.74, p < 0.001) and/or academic centers (aOR:1.70, p = 0.024) had superior LN yield. LN yield was not associated with overall survival (aHR:0.93, p = 0.493). ConclusionsIn this analysis of national data, LN yield following laparoscopic resection for GBC was significantly lower than following open resection. Open resection is more frequently performed at academic centers, possibly to assure adequate oncologic resection. Enforcing consensus guidelines for lymphadenectomy in gallbladder cancer will optimize outcomes as minimally invasive approaches evolve.

Minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the morbid obese: does size really matter?

BackgroundAs obesity becomes more prevalent, it presents a technical challenge for minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery. Various studies have examined the clinical outcomes of obese surgical patients. However, morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 35) are becoming increasingly more common. This study aims to investigate the short-term surgical outcomes of morbidly obese patients undergoing minimal-invasive colorectal surgery and compare them with both obese (30 ≤ BMI < 35) and non-obese patients (BMI < 30).MethodsPatients from three centres who received minimally invasive colorectal surgical resections between 2006 and 2016 were identified from prospectively collected databases. The baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes of morbidly obese, obese and non-obese patients were analysed.ResultsA total of 1386 patients were identified, 84 (6%) morbidly obese, 246 (18%) obese and 1056 (76%) non-obese. Patients’ baseline characteristics were similar for age, operating surgeon, surgical approach but differed in terms of ASA grade and gender. There was no difference in conversion rate, length of stay, anastomotic leak rate and 30-day readmission, reoperation and mortality rates. Operation time and blood loss were different across the 3 groups (morbidly obese vs obese vs non-obese: 185 vs 188 vs 170 min, p = 0.000; 20 vs 20 vs 10 ml, p = 0.003). In patients with malignant disease there was no difference in lymph node yield or R0 clearance. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis showed that for every one-unit increase in BMI operative time increases by roughly 2 min (univariate 2.243, 95% CI 1.524–2.962; multivariate 2.295; 95% CI 1.554–3.036). Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses showed that BMI does not affect conversion or morbidity and mortality.ConclusionsThe increased technical difficulty encountered in obese and morbidly obese patients in minimally invasive colorectal surgery results in higher operative times and blood loss, although this is not clinically significant. However, conversion rate and post-operative short-term outcomes are similar between morbidly obese, obese and non-obese patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy in relation to lymphadenectomy and resection margins during surgery for oesophageal cancer

Differences in lymph node yield and tumour-involved resection margins comparing neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery with surgery alone for oesophageal cancer are unclear. Patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden in 1987–2010 were included. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy were compared with those who underwent surgery alone. Outcomes were the number of examined lymph nodes (main outcome), number metastatic lymph nodes, and resection margin status. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs of lymph node yield were calculated by Poisson regression, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of resection margin status by multivariable logistic regression, both adjusted for confounders. Among 1818 patients, 587 (32%) had received neoadjuvant therapy and 1231 (68%) had not. Lymph node yield was lower in the neoadjuvant therapy group (median 6 versus 8; adjusted RR 0.75, 0.73–0.78). Fewer metastatic nodes were identified following neoadjuvant therapy (median 0 versus 1; adjusted RR 0.76, 0.69–0.84). Neoadjuvant therapy associated to decreased risk of tumour-involved resection margins when adjusted for confounders except T-stage (OR 0.52, 0.38–0.70), but the association did not remain after adjustment for T-stage (OR 0.91, 0.64–1.29). Neoadjuvant therapy seems to decrease the lymph node yield and decrease the risk of tumour-involved resection margins by shrinking primary tumour.