In India, the terms dietetics and dietitian have been domesticated since the career in dietetics began with the introduction of graduate programs in home sciences. To add to its greater degree of domesticity was the fact that the study of home science was purely a female prerogative. The baccalaureate degree in home science was encouraged because the family felt that the girl was educated without her domesticity being adversely affected, especially in the marriage market. The enterprising among the graduates of home science decided to convert their academic qualification into a specialization in the allied-health specialist category, and thus the profession of dietitian was generated. Their ambit of interaction, however, was limited to the hospital kitchens, thus retaining the domestic character of the dietitian, and this identification is best described by the following phrases: rotund; an official food taster; glorified cook; a sedentary clerk, calculating and maintaining calories and the weight of the food or nutrient; and maintaining and formulating unappetizing recipes for the helpless, hapless patient. This myth needed to be exploded. Therefore, to convert nutrition from sheer art of feeding the body at all stages of life to the science that feeds the body in health and disease, in the 1980s, a branch of study was segregated and specifically designated as “Nutrition and Dietetics.” But the progression was arrested because the centers offering this training were the home science colleges that were exclusively for women, and they had no access to hospitals or medical universities to back their teaching and learning programs. Although nursing and nutrition are derived from the same root word nutricus, nutrition has not received the exalted status that nursing has in the medical scenario. Despite the added glamour and dietitians calling themselves clinical nutritionists, the work environment did not undergo any change whatsoever. The nutrition world was changing at a pace much faster than the situation at the home front, and the access to the academic knowledge was limited. This curtailed the advancement of the dietitian in becoming a true and strong link between the community and the clinical and commercial aspects of nutrition. It had been realized that the clinical nutritionist is a vital link between the physician and the patient. The clinical nutritionists or dietitians had understood that they were required to maintain data relevant to the anergic metabolic profile, play a very scientifically dynamic role at the bedside of the patient, and be an active member of the team treating the patient. However, the lack of exposure to the hospital-based patient environment inspired no confidence in effecting the change. For the first time in India, a private medical university recognized the lacuna and decided to correct it. It acknowledged the need for a clinical nutritionist to be identified as a trained professional in the area of nutrition, who focuses on diet therapy, incorporating normal and modified prescriptions, planning, and instructing, while encouraging individualized dietary compliance in both health and disease. A job specification was delineated on the premise that the knowledge of clinical nutrition must be used to: