Interarm Diastolic Blood Pressure Difference Research Articles

Association of interarm blood pressure difference with selected body circumferences among Walter Sisulu University community

BackgroundA high interarm blood pressure difference (IAD) has been identified as a precursor of vascular diseases. Anthropometric measures for obesity such as body circumferences including waist circumference (WC), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and neck circumference (NC) have been associated with a high IAD in Western countries. However, the prevalence of IAD and its association with body circumferences in South African communities such as universities is not well established. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the correlation of IAD with selected body circumferences among the Walter Sisulu University (WSU) community.MethodsA total of 230 participants, 117 males and 113 females, consisting of 185 students and 45 staff members from WSU, aged 18–27 and 18–63 years respectively, participated in this cross-sectional study. The selected body circumferences: WC, MUAC, and NC were measured using standard procedures. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured in both arms simultaneously using automated machines. IAD was achieved by calculating differences in SBP and DBP between the left (L) and right (R) arms, (R -L), and getting the absolute value, L–R (|L–R|).Results14.78% of the participants had an interarm SBP difference (IASBPD) ≥ 10 mmHg, and 4.35% of participants had an interarm DBP difference (IADBPD) ≥ 10 mmHg.In a Pearson’s correlation analysis, IASBPD was positively correlated with the selected body circumferences (WC, r = 0.29; P < 0.001; MUAC, r = 0.35; P < 0.001; NC, r = 0.27; P < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (r = 0.30; P < 0.001). In the multivariable-adjusted regression analyses, IASBPD was positively associated with MUAC (adjusted R2 = 0.128, β = 0.271 (95% CI = 0.09; 0.60), P = 0.008), and NC (adjusted R2 = 0.119, β = 0.190 (95% CI = 0.01; 0.32), P = 0.032) only, adjusted for MAP, age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol. There was no association of body circumferences with IADBPD.ConclusionA high IAD is common among students and staff members of the WSU community. Furthermore, IAD showed a positive correlation with MUAC and NC. These body circumferences can serve as indicators of high IAD, aiding in the early detection and prevention of vascular diseases.

Prevalence and factors associated with inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences: results from the baseline Fasa Adult’s Cohort Study (FACS)

BackgroundOne of the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular diseases is the inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD), which can be easily measured. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors related to the Iranian population’s inter-arm differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.MethodThis cross-sectional study was conducted on the baseline data of participants who had Iranian nationality, were at least 1 year of residence in the area, aged within the age range of 35–70 years, and willed to participate from the Fasa Persian Adult Cohort Study (FACS). IAD for systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured and categorized into two groups of difference < 10 and ≥ 10 mmHg. Logistic regression was used to model the association between independent variables and IAD.ResultsThe prevalence of systolic and diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg was 16.34% and 10.2%, respectively, among 10,124 participants. According to the multivariable logistic regression models, age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.019 [95% CI: 1.013, 1.025]), body mass index (BMI) (aOR: 1.112 [95% CI: 1.016, 1.229]), having type 2 diabetes (aOR Yes/No: 1.172 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.368]), having chronic headaches (aOR Yes/No: 1.182 [95% CI: 1.024, 1.365]), and pulse rate (aOR: 1.019 [95% CI: 1.014, 1.024]) significantly increased the odds of systolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg. Additionally, high socio-economic status decreased the odds of systolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg (aOR High/Low: 0.854 [95% CI: 0.744, 0.979]). For diastolic IAD, age (aOR: 1.112 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.210]) and pulse rate (aOR: 1.021 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.027]) significantly increased the odds of diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg. Moreover, high socioeconomic status decreased the odds of diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg (aOR High/Low: 0.820 [95% CI: 0.698, 0.963]).ConclusionThe noticeable prevalence of systolic and diastolic IAD in general population exhibits health implications due to its’ association with the risk of cardiovascular events. Sociodemographic and medical history assessments have potentials to be incorporated in IAD risk stratification and preventing programs.

Usefulness of four-limb blood pressure measurement in prediction of overall and cardiovascular mortality in acute myocardial infarction.

Four-limb blood pressure measurement could improve mortality prediction in the elderly. However, there was no study to evaluate whether such measurement was still useful in predicting overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Two hundred AMI patients admitted to cardiac care unit were enrolled. The 4-limb blood pressures, inter-limb blood pressure differences, and ankle brachial index (ABI) were measured using an ABI-form device. The median follow-up to mortality was 64 months (25th-75th percentile: 5-174 months). There were 40 and 138 patients documented as CV and overall mortality, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the ankle diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on the lower side, ABI value, ABI < 0.9, interarm DBP difference, interankle systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP differences, interankle SBP difference ≥ 15 mmHg, and interankle DBP difference ≥ 10 mmHg could predict overall mortality (P ≤ 0.025). The ankle DBP on the lower side, interankle DBP difference, and interankle DBP difference ≥ 10 mmHg could predict CV mortality (P ≤ 0.031). In addition, in the Nested Cox model, the model including the ankle DBP on the lower side and the model including interankle DBP difference had the best value for overall and CV mortality prediction, respectively (P ≤ 0.031). In AMI patients, 4-limb blood pressure measurement could generate several useful parameters in predicting overall and CV mortality. Furthermore, ankle DBP on the lower side and interankle DBP difference were the most powerful parameters in prediction of overall and CV mortality, respectively.

Inter-arm Blood Pressure Difference is Associated with Recurrent Stroke in Non-cardioembolic Stroke Patients

Recurrent stroke increases mortality and aggravates the disability of stroke patients. We hypothesized that increased inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference and inter-arm diastolic blood pressure difference would be related to recurrent stroke in non-cardioembolic stroke patients. A total of 1226 consecutive non-cardioembolic first-ever ischemic stroke patients, in whom bilateral brachial blood pressures were measured by an automated ankle-brachial index measuring device, were included in our study. Recurrent stroke was defined as newly developed neurologic symptoms with relevant lesions on brain CT and/or MRI after 7 days or hospital discharge. Inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences ≥10 mmHg were noted in 9.7% (120/1226) and 5.0% (62/1226) of patients, respectively. During a median 24 months of follow-up, 105 (8.5%) patients experienced recurrent stroke. Patients who had inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference ≥10 mmHg showed increased risk of recurrent stroke (hazard ratio:1.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–3.00, p = 0.033). Moreover, inter-arm diastolic blood pressure difference ≥10 mmHg was also independently associated with increased risk of recurrent stroke (hazard ratio:2.92, 95% confidence interval: 1.59–5.34, p = 0.001). In conclusion, inter-arm blood pressure difference ≥10 mmHg may be associated with increased risk recurrent stroke in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.

Association of interarm blood pressure difference with cardio-cerebral vascular disease: A community-based, cross-sectional study.

Interarm blood pressure difference (IAD) is a risk factor for peripheral artery disease and cardio-cerebral vascular disease (CCVD). The current study examines the association of IAD with stroke and coronary heart disease in a Chinese community. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Pudong New Area in Shanghai, China. A total of 10657 residents aged 15years and older were randomly selected through three-stage sampling. Volunteers had systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) measured in both arms at recruitment, and IAD was defined in both arms as the absolute difference in BP. Medical records of study participants were reviewed by investigators to confirm measurements. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between systolic interarm blood pressure difference (sIAD) and diastolic interarm blood pressure difference (dIAD) with stroke and coronary heart disease. Compared with dIAD <5mmHg, the multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) of stroke prevalence was 1.357 (95% CI 0.725-2.542, P=0.034) for dIAD ≥20mmHg and 1.702 (95% CI1.025-2.828, P=0.040) for dIAD between 15 and 19mmHg, and the multivariate adjusted OR of coronary heart disease prevalence was 1.726 (95% CI 1.093-2.726, P=0.019) for dIAD ≥20mmHg and 1.498 (95% CI 0.993-2.261, P=0.044) for dIAD between 15 and 19mmHg. The relationship between cardio-cerebral vascular disease and dIAD was significant in a Chinese community population. Further cohort studies are needed to investigate the association of different levels of IAD with the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and subsequent mortality.

Interarm Blood Pressure Difference has Various Associations with the Presence and Burden of Cerebral Small-Vessel Diseases in Noncardioembolic Stroke Patients.

Background and PurposeAn interarm blood pressure difference (IABD) is independently related to the occurrence of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Cerebral small-vessel diseases (SVDs) are important risk factors for stroke, cognitive dysfunction, and mortality. We aimed to determine whether IABD is related to cerebral SVDs.MethodsThis study included 1,205 consecutive noncardioembolic ischemic stroke patients as confirmed by brain MRI and simultaneously measured the bilateral brachial blood pressures. We investigated cerebral SVDs based on high-grade white-matter hyperintensities (HWHs), presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), high-grade perivascular spaces (HPVSs), and asymptomatic lacunar infarctions (ALIs) on brain MRI.ResultsIn multivariate logistic regression, an interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBD) ≥10 mm Hg was independently related to the existence of HWHs [odds ratio (OR)=1.94, 95% CI=1.32–2.84, p=0.011] and had a tendency to be associated with the presence of HPVSs (OR=1.45, 95% CI=0.49–2.23, p=0.089) and ALIs (OR=1.42, 95% CI=0.96–2.11, p=0.052), but not with the presence of CMBs (OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.73–1.61, p=0.634). In multivariate linear regression adjusted for age, sex, and variables with p<0.1 in the univariate analysis, IASBD ≥10 mm Hg and interarm diastolic blood pressure difference ≥10 mm Hg were significantly correlated with an increased total burden of SVDs (β=0.080 and p=0.006, and β=0.065 and p=0.023, respectively).ConclusionsThis study found that IABD ≥10 mm Hg was associated with the presence and increased burden of cerebral SVDs in noncardioembolic stroke patients. This suggests that IABD ≥10 mm Hg could be a useful indicator of the presence and burden of cerebral SVDs in stroke patients.

INTERARM BLOOD PRESSURE

Interarm blood pressure difference is linked to various peripheral arterial diseaseand thus occupies great significance in vascular medicine. Due to various physiological&amp;pathological changes vessels suffer with hardening that produces measurable inter armblood pressure difference. Less than one in 5 physicians is interested in measuring bloodpressure in both arms. Objectives: to study the interarm blood pressure difference amongmedical students and its association with age, gender, BMI. Study Design: Cross-sectionalstudy. Setting: Karachi. Period: September 2015 to November 2015. Methodology: Data wascollected from 305 individuals, Blood pressure was measured by designated technician withstudents in sitting position with at least 5 minutes of rest, among healthy nonsmokers medicalstudents of DUHS. Results: Mean weight of individuals was 57.4+- 12.9 kg. Mean height wasfound to be 164.6+-9.5 mm of Hg. Mean BMI of individuals was 21.0 +-3.78 kg/m2. Mean rightarm systolic blood pressure was found to be 102.9+-13.4 mm of Hg. Mean right arm diastolicpressure was found to be 64.1+-12.8 mm of Hg. Mean left arm systolic blood pressure wasfound to be 101.8 +-13.0 mm of Hg. Mean left arm diastolic blood pressure was found tobe 64.4+-12.9 mm of Hg. Mean interarm systolic blood pressure was found to be 7.4+-7.6mm of Hg. Mean interarm diastolic blood pressure difference was found to be 8.6+-8.5 mmof Hg. Conclusions: Regular measurement of blood pressure in both arms and assessmentof interarm blood pressure difference can lead to a new era where vascular events can bediagnosed at an earlier stage and thus treated earlier

English

Interarm blood pressure difference is linked to various peripheral arterial diseaseand thus occupies great significance in vascular medicine. Due to various physiological&amp;pathological changes vessels suffer with hardening that produces measurable inter armblood pressure difference. Less than one in 5 physicians is interested in measuring bloodpressure in both arms. Objectives: to study the interarm blood pressure difference amongmedical students and its association with age, gender, BMI. Study Design: Cross-sectionalstudy. Setting: Karachi. Period: September 2015 to November 2015. Methodology: Data wascollected from 305 individuals, Blood pressure was measured by designated technician withstudents in sitting position with at least 5 minutes of rest, among healthy nonsmokers medicalstudents of DUHS. Results: Mean weight of individuals was 57.4+- 12.9 kg. Mean height wasfound to be 164.6+-9.5 mm of Hg. Mean BMI of individuals was 21.0 +-3.78 kg/m2. Mean rightarm systolic blood pressure was found to be 102.9+-13.4 mm of Hg. Mean right arm diastolicpressure was found to be 64.1+-12.8 mm of Hg. Mean left arm systolic blood pressure wasfound to be 101.8 +-13.0 mm of Hg. Mean left arm diastolic blood pressure was found tobe 64.4+-12.9 mm of Hg. Mean interarm systolic blood pressure was found to be 7.4+-7.6mm of Hg. Mean interarm diastolic blood pressure difference was found to be 8.6+-8.5 mmof Hg. Conclusions: Regular measurement of blood pressure in both arms and assessmentof interarm blood pressure difference can lead to a new era where vascular events can bediagnosed at an earlier stage and thus treated earlier

Prevalence of Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference among Clinical Out-Patients

An increased inter-arm blood pressure difference is an easily determined physical finding, may use as an indicator of cardio vascular event and other sever diseases. Authors evaluated 477 patients to determine the prevalence and significance of inter-arm blood pressure difference. 477 routine outdoor patients selected to observe the inter-arm blood pressure difference. Age, height, weight, body mass index, history of disease and blood pressure recorded. The prevalence of ≥10 mmHg systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference was 5.0% was more as compared to 3.8% had diastolic inter-arm blood pressure difference. The prevalence of systolic and diastolic inter-arm difference between 6 to 10 mmHg was 31.4% and 27.9% respectively. Mean systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference was significantly higher among those patients had a multisystem disorder (10.57±0.98 mmHg) and followed by patients with cardiovascular disease (10.22±0.67 mmHg) as compared to healthy patients (2.71±0.96 mmHg). Various diseases highly influenced the increase in blood pressure irrespective of systolic or diastolic was confirmed strongly significant (p<0.001) at different inter arm blood pressure difference levels. This study supports the view of inter-arm blood pressure difference as an alarming stage of increased disease risk that incorporated to investigate potential problems at an early diagnostic stage. A significant mean difference between left and right arm blood pressure recorded for many diseases.

Interarm Blood Pressure Difference in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

This study was performed to determine the relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the interarm blood pressure difference (IAD) and to elucidate the role of the IAD as a surrogate marker for early detection of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with SLE. In total, 135 patients with SLE and 135 age- and gender-matched subjects were enrolled. The IAD and risk of an abnormal IAD were compared between the SLE and control groups, and logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between SLE and an abnormal IAD. The specificity and sensitivity of an IAD of 10 mm Hg or greater for diagnosis of PAD (ankle brachial index of <0.90) were calculated. Both the systolic and diastolic IADs were significantly higher in the SLE group than in the control group (P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, SLE remained significantly associated with an abnormal IAD (P = 0.039). Both the systolic and diastolic IADs were negatively associated with the ankle brachial index. Using a systolic IAD of 10 mm Hg or greater as the cutoff point, the specificity and sensitivity for PAD were 90% and 41%, respectively. A diastolic IAD of 10 mm Hg or greater exhibited higher specificity (92%), but lower sensitivity (30%). Systemic lupus erythematosus is independently associated with an abnormal IAD, and an IAD of 10 mm Hg or greater predicts PAD with high specificity but low sensitivity. Blood pressure should be measured at least once in both arms in patients with SLE for early detection of asymptomatic PAD.

Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference in Hospitalized Elderly Patients Is Not Associated With Excess Mortality.

Inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) has been found to be associated with cardiovascular mortality. Its clinical significance and association with mortality in the elderly is not well defined. This study evaluated the association of IAD with mortality in a cohort of hospitalized elderly individuals. Blood pressure (BP) was measured simultaneously in both arms in elderly individuals (older than 65 years) hospitalized in a geriatric ward from October 2012 to July 2014. During the study period, 445 patients, mostly women (54.8%) with a mean age of 85±5 years, were recruited. Systolic and diastolic IAD were >10 mm Hg in 102 (22.9%) and 76 (17.1%) patients, respectively. Patients were followed for an average of 342±201 days. During follow-up, 102 patients (22.9%) died. Mortality was not associated with systolic or diastolic IAD. It is therefore questionable whether BP should be routinely measured in both arms in the elderly.

Abstract P180: Ten-Year and Lifetime Cardiovascular Risk and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Mexican Women

Introduction: Estimates of Lifetime Cardiovascular Risk may identify individuals with different levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk within the low short-term risk (10-year risk) for coronary heart disease (CHD) category defined by the Framingham Risk Score. Evidence of the applicability of this risk stratification in relatively young people is limited, especially among Hispanics. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that the risk categories from the combination of these two risk stratification scales are positively associated with subclinical CVD in Mexican women. Methods: We calculated 10-year CHD risk using the Framingham Risk Score and lifetime CVD risk based on risk factor burden in 759 women in Southern Mexico from the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort and evaluated the presence of subclinical CVD. We evaluated common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), ankle-brachial index (ABI), and inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) using standard protocols and performed laboratory analyses from a fasting blood draw. We defined three risk strata: Low 10-year (&lt;10%)/Low lifetime risk, Low 10-year (&lt;10%)/High lifetime risk, and High 10-year risk (≥10%). We evaluated outcome measures continuously and estimated the prevalence of subclinical CVD for each risk strata. We defined subclinical CVD as IMT ≥0.8 mm or atheromatous plaque, ABI &lt;0.90, systolic IAD ≥20 mmHg or diastolic IAD ≥10 mmHg. We calculated the sensibility and specificity of the predicted risk categories to detect subclinical CVD. Results: Women evaluated had a mean age of 48.4 years, 22.5% (n=171) were classified as High 10-year CHD Risk, 58.8% (n=446) as Low 10-year/High lifetime risk and 18.7% (n=142) as Low 10-year/Low lifetime risk. We observed significant increase in IMT measurement according to increasing risk categories: 0.656 mm (±0.062), 0.704mm (±0.085), and 0.739mm (±0.089) (p= &lt;0.001). We found similar significant trends in ABI (p= 0.001), systolic IAD (p= &lt;0.001), and diastolic IAD (p= &lt;0.001). We observed a significant higher prevalence of at least one subclinical CVD as the risk category increased: 10.6%, 26.9%, and 45.6% (p= &lt;0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of these scores to detect subclinical CVD was of 93% and 23%, whereas only considering the high vs. low 10-year risk categories these parameters were 37% and 83% respectively. Conclusion: The combination of these short-term and lifetime risk scores accurately identify differences in objective measurements of subclinical cardiovascular disease in Mexican women. Further calibration of these risk scores is needed to incorporate them in the risk assessment tools to identify individuals at risk for the implementation of preventive strategies in the Mexican population.

Inter-arm blood pressure difference in hospitalized elderly patients--is it consistent?

Inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) is recognized as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Its reproducibility in the elderly is unknown. The authors determined the prevalence and reproducibility of IAD in hospitalized elderly patients. Blood pressure was measured simultaneously in both arms on two different days in elderly individuals hospitalized in a geriatric ward. The study included 364 elderly patients (mean age, 85±5years). Eighty-four patients (23%) had systolic IAD >10 and 62 patients (17%) had diastolic IAD >10mmHg. A total of 319 patients had two blood pressure measurements. Systolic and diastolic IAD remained in the same category in 203 (64%) and 231 (72%) patients, respectively. Correlations of systolic and diastolic IAD between the two measurements were poor. Consistency was not affected by age, body mass index, comorbidities, or treatment. IAD is extremely common in hospitalized elderly patients, but, because of poor consistency, its clinical significance in this population is uncertain.

The Inter-Arm Diastolic Blood Pressure Difference Induced by One Arm Ischemia: A New Approach to Assess Vascular Endothelia Function

ObjectivesTo evaluate whether inter-arm diastolic blood pressure difference (DBPl-r) induced by one arm ischemia correlates with flow-mediated dilatation (FMD).MethodsBilateral arm BPs were simultaneously measured with two automatic devices and right brachial artery diameter (D) was measured by ultrasound technique in 108 subjects (56 hypertensives and 52 normotensives). Following baseline diameter (D0) and BP measurement, right brachial artery was occluded for 5 minutes. The diameter was measured at 1, 1.5 and 2 min, and bilateral BPs measured at 3, 4 and 5 min after occlusion release. Their averages were recorded as post-D and post-BP, respectively. The difference between post-D and D0 (ΔD) was calculated as the percentage increase of artery diameter (ΔD/D0). The BP difference between left and right arms was calculated as BPl-r, and the difference of post- BPl-r and baseline BPl-r was recorded as the net change of BPl-r (ΔBPl-r).ResultsAt baseline, bilateral SBPs and DBPs were similar. Right arm ischemia induced significant DBP decline only in the right arm (68.8±12.7 vs 72.6±12.0 mmHg, P<0.05), which led to an increase of ΔDBPl-r (4.00±3.75 vs 0.78±4.47 mmHg, P<0.05). A positive correlation was seen between ΔD/D0 and ΔDBPl-r (r = 0.744, p<0.001). Furthermore, the correlation between age and ΔDBPl-r (r = −0.358, P<0.01) was similar to that between age and D/D0 (r = −0.398, P<0.01). Meanwhile, both ΔDBPl-r and ΔD/D0 were significantly lower in hypertensive patients than in normotensive patients.ConclusionThe inter-arm DBP difference induced by one arm ischemia may be a potential index for clinical evaluation of vascular endothelial function.

ASSA13-18-2 Aging Attenuates the Inter-Arm Diastolic Blood Pressure Difference Induced by One Arm Exercise

ObjectivesIt is known that one arm exercise increases the inter-arm diastolic blood pressure difference (dIAD) in young people, but no research was performed in middle-aged and more senior population. This...

Aging attenuates the interarm diastolic blood pressure difference induced by one-arm exercise

It is known that one-arm exercise increases the interarm diastolic blood pressure difference (dIAD) in young individuals, but no research has been carried out in middle-aged and more senior populations. This study aimed to determine whether aging impacts the exercise-induced dIAD in healthy individuals. Normotensive adults (n=120) were recruited and divided into the young (22.5±1.5 years), middle-aged (42.8±4.6 years), and senior (61.0±7.0 years) groups. The right arm exercise involved performing cycling movements at 60 times/min for 3 min. Bilateral brachial blood pressures (BPs) were simultaneously measured using two automatic BP measurement devices before (baseline), immediately (0), 5, 10, and 15 min after the exercise. The difference in bilateral diastolic BPs was calculated as BP l-r and its absolute value of at least 10 mmHg was considered as IAD. At baseline, the systolic blood pressure (SBP) l-r and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) l-r were similar in three age groups. One-arm exercise induced a marked decrease in DBP in the exercised arm, and then increased the prevalence of DBP l-r and dIAD in the three age groups in an age-dependent manner. The prevalence of dIAD increased from the baseline of zero to 85% at 0 min in young, 37% in middle-aged, and 30% in senior groups. One-arm exercise did not significantly alter the prevalence of SBP l-r and systolic IAD in the three groups. A reverse correlation was found between the DBP l-r 0 and ages (r=-0.359, P<0.05), but there was no correlation between aging and SBP l-r 0. Aging attenuates the levels and duration of the dIAD induced by one-arm exercise in healthy adults.

One arm exercise induces significant interarm diastolic blood pressure difference

This study is designed to investigate the inducing effect of one arm exercise on interarm difference (IAD) in the blood pressure (BP). Fifty healthy young participants were included in the study. Three-minute exercises of the right arm elbow flexion and extension were performed. The bilateral brachial BP was simultaneously measured with two automatic BP measurement devices before (basic) and immediately 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min after exercise. The absolute difference in the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) between the left and right BP of at least 10 mmHg was recognized as sIAD and dIAD. The baseline data of the SBP and DBP in left and right arms revealed no significant difference (SBP: 110 ± 10 vs. 111 ± 11 mmHg; DBP: 66 ± 8 vs. 66 ± 9 mmHg, both not significant). The prevalence of dIAD was 2% at the baseline. However, this prevalence increased to 80% at 0 min, as right arm exercise induced the right DBP decrease and left DBP increase, and then the prevalence decreased gradually within a 30-min recovery period. The prevalence of sIAD was zero at the baseline and the maximal prevalence was 8% during the 20-min postexercise period. One arm exercise can lead to a significant IAD in DBP. Any arm exercise should be avoided before BP measurement.

Interarm differences in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure: the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study

To examine whether blood pressure (BP) differs between arms in hypertensive siblings and randomly selected volunteers, and whether this difference is explained by cardiovascular risk factors. The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network recruited 2395 hypertensive siblings and 854 volunteers. BP was measured six times (three measurements per arm) in seated participants using a Dinamap monitor. The average of three measurements was calculated per arm and the difference taken between arms (i.e. interarm BP differences). The mean age of the subjects was 56 years, and about one-half of the sample was male. More than one-half of the sample was African-American. The mean diastolic BP was equal in the two arms in the random sample (68.8 versus 68.7 mmHg) and in hypertensive siblings (73.4 versus 73.1 mmHg), as was systolic BP (random, 119.6 versus 119.3 mmHg; hypertensives, 130.8 versus 130.7 mmHg). The mean interarm diastolic and systolic BP differences were 2.96 +/- 2.51 and 4.61 +/- 4.10 mmHg, respectively, in the random sample and were 3.09 +/- 2.73 and 5.35 +/- 4.98 mmHg, respectively, in hypertensive siblings. Few (random, 1.6%; hypertensives, 2.8%) had interarm diastolic BP differences > 10 mmHg, but 9.2% of the random sample and 14.2% of hypertensive siblings had systolic BP differences > 10 mmHg. Obesity, higher heart rate, and higher systolic BP were associated with larger interarm BP differences. These results have implications for blood pressure measurement in research settings and in screening programs.

Blood pressure. Assessment of interarm differences.

Although a large interarm blood pressure difference is assumed to help identify patients with aortic dissection, the degree of normal interarm blood pressure variation has not been well defined. To determine the normal variation in bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure measurements, we conducted a prospective observational study on a convenience sample of ambulatory patients who were seen at a university hospital emergency department. Bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure measurements were performed with an automated blood pressure monitor at the time the patient was seen. Clinical and demographic data collected included age, sex, race, medical history, chief complaint, cardiac risk factors, pulse, bilateral blood pressure measurements, and discharge diagnosis. The primary outcome measures were the interarm blood pressure differences. Of 610 patients, 324 (53%) had a systolic or a diastolic interarm blood pressure difference of more than 10 mm Hg, and 113 (19%) had a systolic or a diastolic interarm blood pressure difference of more than 20 mm Hg. The variation in interarm blood pressure measurements was unrelated to age, gender, race, mean arterial pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, or discharge diagnosis. The mean interarm systolic blood pressure difference was significantly greater in patients with known coronary artery disease (14.5 vs 10.4 mm Hg; P = .05, Student t test). Bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure determinations, as measured by automated indirect measurement, have a wide degree of interarm variation.