Diagnostic Yield Of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy Research Articles

Transbronchial Cryobiopsy Is Superior to Forceps Biopsy for Diagnosing both Fibrotic and Non-Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) evaluation often requires lung biopsy for definite diagnosis. In recent years, transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) emerged as a procedure with higher diagnostic yield than transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB), especially for fibrotic ILDs. Nonetheless, studies comparing these modalities in non-fibrotic ILDs and for specific ILD diagnoses are scarce. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of TBCB and TBFB in patients with fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILDs. Method: An observational retrospective multicenter study including patients with ILD diagnosis by multidisciplinary discussion that underwent TBCB or TBFB between 2017 and 2021. Chest CT scans were reviewed by a chest radiologist. Biopsy specimens were categorized as diagnostic (with specific histological pattern), nondiagnostic, or without lung parenchyma. Nondiagnostic samples were reassessed by a second lung pathologist. TBCB and TBFB diagnostic yields were analyzed by multivariate regression. Procedural complications were evaluated as well. Results: 276 patients were included, 116 (42%) underwent TBCB and 160 (58%) TBFB. Fibrotic ILDs were present in 148 patients (54%). TBCB diagnostic yield was 78% and TBFB 48% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.2, 95% CI: 2.4–7.6, p < 0.01). The diagnostic yield of TBCB was higher than TBFB among patients with fibrotic ILD (AOR 3.8, p < 0.01), non-fibrotic ILD (AOR 5.8, p < 0.01), and across most ILD diagnoses. TBCB was associated with higher risk for significant bleeding (10% vs. 3%, p < 0.01), but similar risk for pneumothorax. Conclusions: Diagnostic yield of TBCB was superior to that of TBFB for both fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILDs, and across most diagnoses.

Diagnostic Yield of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy Guided by Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy in the Radiologically Suspected Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Study.

Simple SummaryThe morphological diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions is challenging due to the anatomical location of these lesions and to the biopsy techniques that are currently available. Transbronchial forceps biopsies guided by fluoroscopy alone, or additional with radial mini probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS), were well-known standardised procedures with an unsatisfactory diagnostic yield. Transbronchial cryobiopsy is a novel technique of lung parenchyma biopsy for the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases, which has a very high diagnostic yield (80–96%) and relatively low incidence of complications (3–26%). Due to these reasons, transbronchial cryobiopsy guided by RP-EBUS and fluoroscopy in peripheral lung lesions are under active investigation, but still, there is limited data as only a few clinical trials of transbronchial cryobiopsy are published around the world. Our study showed that transbronchial cryobiopsy is a potentially safe procedure when obtaining a larger size of samples. Furthermore, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 85.1%, 100%, 100%, 12.5%, and 93% for TBCB as well as 91.5%, 100%, 100%, 20.0% and 96.7% for the combined procedures, respectively.Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is being studied in the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions; however, there are only a few clinical studies around the world. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic values and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy for radiologically suspected peripheral lung cancer. The prospective clinical study was executed from September 2019 to September 2021 at a tertiary clinical centre in Lithuania. A total of 48 patients out of 102 underwent combined procedures of transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) and TBCB. Diagnostic values and safety outcomes of TBFB and TBCB were analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were 72.9%, 100%, 100%, 7.7%, and 88.0% for TBFB, 85.1%, 100%, 100%, 12.5%, and 93% for TBCB, as well as 91.5%, 100%, 100%, 20.0% and 96.7% for the combined procedures, respectively, with a significantly higher accuracy for cryobiopsies compared to forceps biopsies (p < 0.05). The diagnostic values for transbronchial cryobiopsies were similar, irrespective of the radial mini probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) position, lesion size or bronchus sign, however, the sensitivity of the combined procedures in cases with RP-EBUS adjacent to the target was significantly higher compared to TBFB (86.2% vs. 64.3%, p = 0.016). Samples of cryobiopsies were significantly larger than forceps biopsies (34.62 mm2 vs. 4.4 mm2, p = 0.001). The cumulative diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy was 80.0% after the second biopsy and reached a plateau of 84.1% after four biopsies. No severe bleeding, pneumothorax, respiratory failure or death was registered in our study. TBCB is a potentially safe procedure, which increases diagnostic values in diagnosing peripheral lung lesions compared to TBFB.

Efficacy of Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound (R-EBUS) guided transbronchial cryobiopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL...s): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundTransbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is frequently described for the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD). A few studies have reported transbronchial cryobiopsy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL...s). We aimed to study the utility and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy for the diagnosis of PPL...s. MethodsWe performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases to extract the relevant studies. We then performed a meta-analysis to calculate the diagnostic yields of transbronchial cryobiopsy and bronchoscopic forceps biopsy. ResultsFollowing a systematic search, we identified nine relevant studies (300 patients undergoing cryobiopsy). All used Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound (R-EBUS) for PPL localization. The pooled diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy was 77% (95% CI, 71%...84%) (I^2=38.72%, p=0.11). The diagnostic yield of forceps biopsy was 72% (95% CI, 60%...83%) (I^2=78.56%, p<0.01). The diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy was similar (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96...1.15), with a 5% risk difference for diagnostic yield (95% CI, ...6% to 15%). There was significant heterogeneity (I^2=57.2%, p=0.017), and no significant publication bias. One severe bleeding and three pneumothoraxes requiring intercostal drain (ICD) placement (major complication rate 4/122, 1.8%) were reported with transbronchial cryobiopsy. ConclusionsR-EBUS guided transbronchial cryobiopsy is a safe and efficacious modality. The diagnostic yields of TBLC and forceps biopsy are similar. More extensive multicentre randomized trials are required for the further evaluation and standardization of transbronchial cryobiopsy for PPL...s.

Transbronchial Cryobiopsy in the Diagnosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.

Transbronchial cryobiopsy is an emerging procedure to obtain lung tissue for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and has gained popularity because it is less invasive and has a lower rate of complications compared with nonselective surgical lung biopsy. To provide an overview of the status of the medical literature regarding transbronchial cryobiopsy. A literature search was performed using PubMed search engine. The terms "cryobiopsy" or "cryoprobe" and "interstitial lung disease" or "diffuse parenchymal lung disease" or "pulmonary fibrosis" were used, with the search concluding at the end of November 2019. While the diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy is slightly lower than surgical lung biopsy, a growing amount of literature suggests that with a multidisciplinary approach cryobiopsy provides diagnostic and prognostic information approaching that of surgical lung biopsy with lower morbidity and mortality.

Diagnostic Yield and Complications of Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy for Interstitial Lung Disease. A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

The diagnostic usefulness and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for the evaluation of interstitial lung disease remain unclear. This systematic review and metaanalysis aims to establish the diagnostic accuracy and yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy for interstitial lung diseases. We searched MedLine, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and conference proceedings to identify studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy (compared with surgical biopsy) or yield of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for interstitial lung disease (from database inception to January 2016). The diagnostic accuracy and yield were quantified and stratified by the method of diagnosis determination (histologic interpretation in isolation vs. incorporation within a multidisciplinary discussion). The frequency of procedure-related complications was also assessed from these reports. For full-text studies, random-effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy, yield, and complication frequency. Of 900 citations, 11 studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review (7 full text, 4 abstracts). The selected studies reported on a total of 731 patients. No studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of transbronchial cryobiopsy. Diagnostic yield ranged from 74 to 98% when transbronchial cryobiopsy findings were interpreted in isolation, with a pooled estimate of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73-94). Diagnostic yield ranged from 51 to 98% when transbronchial cryobiopsy was reviewed within a multidisciplinary discussion, with a pooled estimate of 79% (95% CI, 65-93). Pooled estimates for pneumothorax and moderate/severe bleeding were 12% (95% CI, 3-21) and 39% (95% CI, 3-76), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy cannot be determined given the absence of studies directly comparing cryobiopsy diagnoses with diagnoses derived from surgical lung biopsies interpreted within multidisciplinary discussions. The histopathological and multidisciplinary discussion-based diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy appears high, but with variable frequencies of complications dominated by pneumothorax and moderate-to-severe hemorrhage.

Diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy in non-neoplastic lung disease: a retrospective case series.

BackgroundDue to the small amount of alveolar tissue in transbronchial biopsy (TBB) by forceps, the diagnosis of diffuse, parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD) is inherently problematic, with an overall low yield. The use of cryotechnique in bronchoscopy, including TBB by cryoprobe, has revealed new opportunities in the endoscopical diagnosis of malignant and non-malignant lung diseases.MethodsTo evaluate TBB by cryotechnique for non-neoplastic lung diseases, we analyzed 52 patients (mean age 63 ± 13 years) with unclear DPLD. These individuals underwent bronchoscopy with TBB by cryoprobe. Thereafter histopathological results were compared with the clinically evaluated diagnosis.ResultsNo major complications were seen. Mean specimen diameter in the histological biopsies was 6.9 ± 4.4 mm (Range 2 – 22 mm). A correlation between clinical and histopathological diagnoses was found in 79% of cases (41/52). In the case of UIP (usual interstitial pneumonia) pattern, the concordance was 10/15 (66%).ConclusionBased on these results TBB by cryotechnique would appear to be a safe and useful method that reveals new perspectives for the endoscopical diagnosis of DPLD.

Diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy in interstitial lung disease: a randomized trial.

Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is required for evaluation in selected patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The diagnostic yield of histopathologic assessment is variable and is influenced by factors such as the size of samples and the presence of crush artefacts left by conventional biopsy forceps. We compared the diagnostic yield and safety of TBLB with cryoprobe sampling versus conventional forceps sampling. This randomized clinical trial analysed data for 77 patients undergoing TBLB for evaluation of ILD; patients were assigned to either a conventional-forceps group or a cryoprobe group. Two pathologists assessed the tissue samples and agreed on histopathologic diagnoses. We also compared the duration of procedures, complications and sample-quality variables. The most frequent diagnosis observed in the cryoprobe group was non-specific interstitial pneumonia. Histopathologic diagnoses were identified in more cases in the cryoprobe group (74.4%) than in the conventional-forceps group (34.1%) (P < 0.001), and the diagnostic yield was higher in the cryoprobe group (51.3% vs 29.1% in the conventional forceps group; P = 0.038). A larger mean area of tissue was harvested by cryoprobe (14.7 ± 11 mm(2) ) than by conventional forceps (3.3 ± 4.1 mm(2)) (P < 0.001). More grade 2 bleeding (not statistically significant) occurred in the cryoprobe group (56.4%) than in the conventional-forceps group (34.2%). No differences in other complications were observed. TBLB by cryoprobe is safe and potentially useful in the diagnosis of ILD. Larger multisite randomized trials are required to confirm the potential benefits of this procedure. Clinical trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01064609.