Diagnostic Yield Of Exome Sequencing Research Articles

Exploring the clinical utility of exome sequencing/mono, duo, trio in prenatal testing: a retrospective study in a tertiary care centre in south India.

With the availability of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) diagnosis of genetic disorders has improved significantly. Its use is also applicable to ascertain diagnosis and management in a perinatal setting. The study aims to detect the genetic aetiology of various congenital structural and functional defects using NGS technology in the reproductive cohort at a tertiary centre. The secondary objective is to address challenges in the interpretation of variants. This was a retrospective study of couples who underwent exome sequencing (Mono-testing proband only or Duo-testing parents only or Trio-testing proband and parents) for suspected single gene disorders between years 2020-2022 at a tertiary care perinatal center in the South India. American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines were followed to classify the pathogenicity of the variants identified by exome sequencing. The overall diagnostic yield as defined by pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants obtained was (23/43) 53.4 %. The individual subsets have the following diagnostic yield viz., Mono 5/6 (83 %); Carrier 16/32 (50 %); Trio 2/5 (40 %). Diagnostic yield was significantly higher in consanguineous couples. However, miscarriage history, and organ system involvement did not have a significant effect on the diagnostic yield. Prenatal diagnosis was offered for seven patients based on the exome result. One fetus was confirmed with a compound heterozygous pathogenic variant. Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in our cohort was 53 %. The detection of pathogenic variants was maximum in those cases undergoing mono exome sequencing. In places where there is a high prevalence of consanguinity and endogamy, NGS may be offered as first line test in the context of prenatal diagnosis.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in prenatal agenesis of corpus callosum: systematic review and meta-analysis.

To determine the incremental diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) after negative chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in cases of prenatally diagnosed agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) and to identify the associated genes and variants. A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published up until June 2022 using four databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. Studies in English reporting on the diagnostic yield of ES following negative CMA in prenatally diagnosed partial or complete ACC were included. Authors of cohort studies were contacted for individual participant data and extended cohorts were provided for two of them. The increase in diagnostic yield with ES for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants was assessed in all cases of ACC, isolated ACC, ACC with other cranial anomalies and ACC with extracranial anomalies. To identify all reported genetic variants, the systematic review included all ACC cases; however, for the meta-analysis, only studies with ≥ three ACC cases were included. Meta-analysis of proportions was employed using a random-effects model. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using modified Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria. A total of 28 studies, encompassing 288 prenatally diagnosed ACC cases that underwent ES following negative CMA, met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. We classified 116 genetic variants in 83 genes associated with prenatal ACC with a full phenotypic description. There were 15 studies, encompassing 268 cases, that reported on ≥ three ACC cases and were included in the meta-analysis. Of all the included cases, 43% had a P/LP variant on ES. The highest yield was for ACC with extracranial anomalies (55% (95% CI, 35-73%)), followed by ACC with other cranial anomalies (43% (95% CI, 30-57%)) and isolated ACC (32% (95% CI, 18-51%)). ES demonstrated an incremental diagnostic yield in cases of prenatally diagnosed ACC following negative CMA. While the greatest diagnostic yield was observed in ACC with extracranial anomalies and ACC with other central nervous system anomalies, ES should also be considered in cases of isolated ACC. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Genetic ancestry and diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in a diverse population

It has been suggested that diagnostic yield (DY) from Exome Sequencing (ES) may be lower among patients with non-European ancestries than those with European ancestry. We examined the association of DY with estimated continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry in a racially/ethnically diverse pediatric and prenatal clinical cohort. Cases (N = 845) with suspected genetic disorders underwent ES for diagnosis. Continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry proportions were estimated from the ES data. We compared the distribution of genetic ancestries in positive, negative, and inconclusive cases by Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests and linear associations of ancestry with DY by Cochran-Armitage trend tests. We observed no reduction in overall DY associated with any genetic ancestry (African, Native American, East Asian, European, Middle Eastern, South Asian). However, we observed a relative increase in proportion of autosomal recessive homozygous inheritance versus other inheritance patterns associated with Middle Eastern and South Asian ancestry, due to consanguinity. In this empirical study of ES for undiagnosed pediatric and prenatal genetic conditions, genetic ancestry was not associated with the likelihood of a positive diagnosis, supporting the equitable use of ES in diagnosis of previously undiagnosed but potentially Mendelian disorders across all ancestral populations.

The diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in liver diseases from a curated gene panel

Exome sequencing (ES) has been used in a variety of clinical settings but there are limited data on its utility for diagnosis and/or prediction of monogenic liver diseases. We developed a curated list of 502 genes for monogenic disorders associated with liver phenotypes and analyzed ES data for these genes in 758 patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). For comparison, we examined ES data in 7856 self-declared healthy controls (HC), and 2187 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Candidate pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants were initially identified in 19.9% of participants, most of which were attributable to previously reported pathogenic variants with implausibly high allele frequencies. After variant annotation and filtering based on population minor allele frequency (MAF ≤ 10–4 for dominant disorders and MAF ≤ 10–3 for recessive disorders), we detected a significant enrichment of P/LP variants in the CLD cohort compared to the HC cohort (X2 test OR 5.00, 95% CI 3.06–8.18, p value = 4.5e−12). A second-level manual annotation was necessary to capture true pathogenic variants that were removed by stringent allele frequency and quality filters. After these sequential steps, the diagnostic rate of monogenic disorders was 5.7% in the CLD cohort, attributable to P/LP variants in 25 genes. We also identified concordant liver disease phenotypes for 15/22 kidney disease patients with P/LP variants in liver genes, mostly associated with cystic liver disease phenotypes. Sequencing results had many implications for clinical management, including familial testing for early diagnosis and management, preventative screening for associated comorbidities, and in some cases for therapy. Exome sequencing provided a 5.7% diagnostic rate in CLD patients and required multiple rounds of review to reduce both false positive and false negative findings. The identification of concordant phenotypes in many patients with P/LP variants and no known liver disease also indicates a potential for predictive testing for selected monogenic liver disorders.

Molecular Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Patients With Congenital Hydrocephalus

Exome sequencing (ES) has been established as the preferred first line of diagnostic testing for certain neurodevelopmental disorders, such as global developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder; however, current recommendations are not specific to or inclusive of congenital hydrocephalus (CH). To determine the diagnostic yield of ES in CH and whether ES should be considered as a first line diagnostic test for CH. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were used to identify studies published in English between January 1, 2010, and April 10, 2023. The following search terms were used to identify studies: congenital hydrocephalus, ventriculomegaly, cerebral ventriculomegaly, primary ventriculomegaly, fetal ventriculomegaly, prenatal ventriculomegaly, molecular analysis, genetic cause, genetic etiology, genetic testing, exome sequencing, whole exome sequencing, genome sequencing, microarray, microarray analysis, and copy number variants. Eligible studies included those with at least 10 probands with the defining feature of CH and/or severe cerebral ventriculomegaly that had undergone ES. Studies with fewer than 10 probands, studies of mild or moderate ventriculomegaly, and studies using genetic tests other than ES were excluded. A full-text review of 68 studies was conducted by 2 reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used by 2 reviewers to extract data. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model of single proportions. Data analysis occurred in April 2023. The primary outcome was pooled diagnostic yield. Additional diagnostic yields were estimated for specific subgroups on the basis of clinical features, syndromic presentation, and parental consanguinity. For each outcome, a 95% CI and estimate of interstudy heterogeneity (I2 statistic) was reported. From 498 deduplicated and screened records, 9 studies with a total of 538 CH probands were selected for final inclusion. The overall diagnostic yield was 37.9% (95% CI, 20.0%-57.4%; I2 = 90.1). The yield was lower for isolated and/or nonsyndromic cases (21.3%; 95% CI, 12.8%-31.0%; I2 = 55.7). The yield was higher for probands with reported consanguinity (76.3%; 95% CI, 65.1%-86.1%; I2 = 0) than those without (16.2%; 95% CI, 12.2%-20.5%; I2 = 0). In this systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield of ES in CH, the diagnostic yield was concordant with that of previous recommendations for other neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting that ES should also be recommended as a routine diagnostic adjunct for patients with CH.

Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Pediatric Cardiomyopathy

To assess the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) in pediatric cardiomyopathy. A single-institution, retrospective chart review of 91 patients with pediatric cardiomyopathy was performed. While pediatric cardiomyopathy is often genetic in nature, no genetic test is recommended as standard of care. All our patients were diagnosed with cardiomyopathy and evaluated by a medical geneticist between January 2010 through September 2022. Demographic information and clinical data were abstracted. Of 91 patients with pediatric cardiomyopathy, 36 (39.6%) received a diagnosis by ES. Twenty-two (61.1%) of these diagnoses would have been missed on cardiac multigene panel testing. The diagnostic yield for cardiomyopathy presenting under 1year of age was 38.3%, while the yield for patients over 1year of age was 41.9%. ES has a high diagnostic yield in pediatric cardiomyopathy compared with a gene panel. Over 60% of patients with diagnosis by ES would not have received their molecular genetic diagnosis if only multigene panel testing was sent. Diagnostic yield did not vary significantly between the subtypes of cardiomyopathy and patient age groups, highlighting the likely clinical utility of ES for all pediatric cardiomyopathy patients.

Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Isolated Fetal Growth Restriction: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

(Abstracted from Prenat Diagn 2023;43:596–604) An estimate of fetal weight below a certain percentile is defined as fetal growth restriction (FGR); different medical organizations define the threshold for FGR differently. Regardless of the definition used, long-term adverse outcomes have been associated with FGR, such as an increased risk of neurodevelopmental delay, along with other, short-term adverse outcomes.

Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Cerebral Palsy and Implications for Genetic Testing Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

(Abstracted from JAMA Pediatr 2023;177(5):472–478) Exome sequencing (ES) is a powerful diagnostic tool that is now used routinely in diagnosing neurodevelopmental disorders, although it is not used as commonly as a tool for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP). Cerebral palsy can and often does occur simultaneously with neurodevelopmental disorders such as intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and speech disorders, which are often evaluated by ES due to their significant genetic components and the variety of known genes that are associated with each disorder.

OC11.08: Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with renal malformations

OC11.08: Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with renal malformations

Molecular Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing and Chromosomal Microarray in Short Stature

Currently, the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for short stature cohorts is uncertain. Despite previous studies reporting the widespread use of ES and CMA, a definitive diagnostic yield has not been established. To investigate the diagnostic yield of ES and CMA in short stature. A systematic literature search was conducted using relevant keywords in 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) in February 2023. Eligible studies for meta-analysis were those that had at least 10 participants with short stature who were diagnosed using either ES or CMA and the number of diagnosed patients was reported. Of 5222 identified studies, 20 were eventually included in the study. Two independent investigators extracted relevant information from each study, which was then synthesized using proportional meta-analysis to obtain the overall diagnostic yield of ES and CMA. The primary outcome measure was to determine the overall diagnostic yield of ES and CMA. A subgroup meta-analysis was also performed to assess if the diagnostic yield varied depending on whether ES was used as a first-tier or last-resort test. Additionally, a meta-regression was carried out to investigate how the diagnostic yield varied over time. Twenty studies were included, comprising 1350 patients with short stature who underwent ES and 1070 patients who completed CMA. The overall diagnostic yield of ES among the cohorts and CMA among the cohorts was found to be 27.1% (95% CI, 18.1%-37.2%) and 13.6% (95% CI, 9.2%-18.7%), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between the first-tier (27.8%; 95% CI, 15.7%-41.8%) and last-resort groups (25.6%; 95% CI, 13.6%-39.6%) (P = .83) or in the percentage of positively diagnosed patients over time. No statistically significant difference was observed between the first-tier (27.8%; 95% CI, 15.7%-41.8%) and last-resort groups (25.6%; 95% CI, 13.6%-39.6%) (P = .83) or in the percentage of positively diagnosed patients over time. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides high-level evidence supporting the diagnostic efficacy of ES and CMA in patients with short stature. The findings serve as a solid reference for clinicians when making informed decisions about recommending these genetic tests.

Prenatal diagnosis and early childhood outcome of fetuses with extremely large nuchal translucency

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prenatal and perinatal outcome of fetuses with extremely large nuchal translucency (eNT) thickness (≥ 6.5 mm).Methods193 (0.61%) singleton fetuses with eNT were retrospectively included. Anomaly scan, echocardiography, and chromosomal and genetic test were included in our antenatal investigation. Postnatal follow-up was offered to all newborns.ResultsMajor congenital anomalies included congenital heart defect (32.6%, 63/193), hydrops fetalis (13.5%, 26/193), omphalocele (9.3%, 18/193), and skeletal dysplasia (7.8%, 15/193) et al. Abnormal karyotype was identified in 81/115 (70.4%) cases including Turner syndrome (n = 47), Trisomy 18 (n = 17), Trisomy 21 (n = 9), and Trisomy 13 (n = 3). Chromosomal microarray analysis provided informative results with 3.6% (1/28) incremental diagnostic yield over conventional karyotyping. The diagnostic yield of exome sequencing is 10.0% (2/20). There was no significant increase [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.974; 95% confidence interval 0.863–4.516; P = 0.104] in the incidence of chromosomal defects despite the presence of other structural anomalies. Only 13 fetuses were successfully followed up and survived at term, no one was found with developmental delay or mental retardation.ConclusionsExtremely large NT has a high risk of chromosomal abnormality. CMA and ES improve chromosomal genomic and genetic diagnosis of fetal increased NT. When cytogenetic analysis and morphology assessment are both normal, the outcome is good.

Systematic evaluation of genome sequencing for the diagnostic assessment of autism spectrum disorder and fetal structural anomalies

Short-read genome sequencing (GS) holds the promise of becoming the primary diagnostic approach for the assessment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and fetal structural anomalies (FSAs). However, few studies have comprehensively evaluated its performance against current standard-of-care diagnostic tests: karyotype, chromosomal microarray (CMA), and exome sequencing (ES). To assess the clinical utility of GS, we compared its diagnostic yield against these three tests in 1,612 quartet families including an individual with ASD and in 295 prenatal families. Our GS analytic framework identified a diagnostic variant in 7.8% of ASD probands, almost 2-fold more than CMA (4.3%) and 3-fold more than ES (2.7%). However, when we systematically captured copy-number variants (CNVs) from the exome data, the diagnostic yield of ES (7.4%) was brought much closer to, but did not surpass, GS. Similarly, we estimated that GS could achieve an overall diagnostic yield of 46.1% in unselected FSAs, representing a 17.2% increased yield over karyotype, 14.1% over CMA, and 4.1% over ES with CNV calling or 36.1% increase without CNV discovery. Overall, GS provided an added diagnostic yield of 0.4% and 0.8% beyond the combination of all three standard-of-care tests in ASD and FSAs, respectively. This corresponded to nine GS unique diagnostic variants, including sequence variants in exons not captured by ES, structural variants (SVs) inaccessible to existing standard-of-care tests, and SVs where the resolution of GS changed variant classification. Overall, this large-scale evaluation demonstrated that GS significantly outperforms each individual standard-of-care test while also outperforming the combination of all three tests, thus warranting consideration as the first-tier diagnostic approach for the assessment of ASD and FSAs.

Diagnosis of Kidney Diseases of Unknown Etiology Through Biopsy-Genetic Analysis

Previous studies have suggested that genetic kidney diseases in adults are often overlooked, representing up to 10% of all cases of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We present data obtained from exome sequencing (ES) analysis of patients with biopsy-proven undetermined kidney disease (UKD). ES was proposed during routine clinical care in patients with UKD from January 2020 to December 2021. We used in silico custom kidney genes panel analysis to detect pathological variations using American College of Medical Genetics guidelines in 52 patients with biopsy-proven UKD with histological finding reassessment. We detected 12 monogenic renal disorders in 21 (40.4%) patients. The most common diagnoses were collagenopathies (8/21,38.1%), COL4A3 and COL4A4 accounting for 80% of these diagnoses, and ciliopathies (5/21, 23.8%). The diagnostic yield of ES was higher in female patients and patients with a family history of kidney disease (57.1% and 71%, respectively). Clinical nephropathy categories matched with the final genetic diagnoses in 72.7% of cases, whereas histological renal lesions matched with the final diagnoses in 92.3% of cases. The genetics diagnoses and histopathological findings were in complete agreement for both glomerular and tubulointerstitial cases. Interstitial inflammation without tubulitis was only observed in tubulopathies or ciliopathies. Isolated CKD, CKD with proteinuria or hematuria, and isolated proteinuria or hematuria yielded the highest diagnostic yields (54.6%, 52.6%, and 42.9%, respectively). ES done in patients with biopsy-proven UKD should be considered as a first-line tool for CKD patients with a family history of kidney disease. Combination of ES and kidney biopsy may have major impacts on kidney disease ontology.

Diagnostic yield of pediatric and prenatal exome sequencing in a diverse population

The diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) has primarily been evaluated in individuals of European ancestry, with less focus on underrepresented minority (URM) and underserved (US) patients. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of ES in a cohort of predominantly US and URM pediatric and prenatal patients suspected to have a genetic disorder. Eligible pediatric patients had multiple congenital anomalies and/or neurocognitive disabilities and prenatal patients had one or more structural anomalies, disorders of fetal growth, or fetal effusions. URM and US patients were prioritized for enrollment and underwent ES at a single academic center. We identified definitive positive or probable positive results in 201/845 (23.8%) patients, with a significantly higher diagnostic rate in pediatric (26.7%) compared to prenatal patients (19.0%) (P = 0.01). For both pediatric and prenatal patients, the diagnostic yield and frequency of inconclusive findings did not differ significantly between URM and non-URM patients or between patients with US status and those without US status. Our results demonstrate a similar diagnostic yield of ES between prenatal and pediatric URM/US patients and non-URM/US patients for positive and inconclusive results. These data support the use of ES to identify clinically relevant variants in patients from diverse populations.

The Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Predominantly Antibody Deficient Patients Followed in Private Practice Allergy/Immunology Clinics

RationalePredominantly Antibody Deficiencies (PAD) account for most inborn errors of immunity (IEI) followed in private practice Allergy/Immunology clinics. While the genetic revolution has provided significant insights to understand the molecular basis of many IEI disorders, genetic testing in PAD has yielded a molecular diagnosis in only 15–30% of patients. These numbers may however be inflated due to selection bias inherent in these studies being performed in academic referral clinics where more complicated patients tend to be referred. The diagnostic yield and utility of broad-based genetic testing is largely unknown in the private practice setting. MethodsTen Consortium of Independent Immunology Clinics (CIIC) sites that provide care for more than 4,000 IEI patients (most with PAD) participated. Providers at each clinic proposed patients for inclusion using a questionnaire that included clinical and lab data that were reviewed by a 5-member enrollment committee. Patients were scored based on several factors including family history, early age of onset, autoimmune features, etc. and stratified as follows: P1 (5–17 points), P2 (3–4 points), P3 (1–2 points), and P4 (No points). P1, P2, and P3 patients were enrolled and samples sent for exome sequencing, lymphocyte subset analysis, and B cell immunophenotyping. ResultsOf 226 patients screened, 198 were selected for enrollment, and 137 submitted samples (48 P1, 58 P2, and 31 P3). Sixty percent were female, mean age 50.7 years (range 8–87), 57.6% had B cell abnormalities (low B cells, low memory B cells, low switched memory B cells, etc.), and 34.8% had Tor NK cell abnormalities (low numbers, reversed CD4/CD8 ratio, etc.). Causative pathogenic variants were identified in 8% of the exomes and highly suspicious VUS were identified in another 5%, predominantly in patients with a P1 priority score. ConclusionWe show that the diagnostic yield of broad-based genetic testing in PAD patients followed in private practice Allergy/Immunology clinics is somewhat lower than that reported in academic referral clinics. Diagnostic yield can, however, be improved by scoring clinical and laboratory features to stratify patients prior to testing.Acknowledgement: Supported by grants from Green Cross Corporation, Shire/Takeda, Pharming Group N.V., and Soleo Health.

Beyond the kidney biopsy: genomic approach to undetermined kidney diseases.

According to data from large national registries, almost 20%-25% of patients with end-stage kidney disease have an undetermined kidney disease (UKD). Recent data have shown that monogenic disease-causing variants are under-diagnosed. We performed exome sequencing (ES) on UKD patients in our center to improve the diagnosis rate. ES was proposed in routine practice for patients with UKD including kidney biopsy from January 2019 to December 2021. Mutations were detected using a targeted bioinformatic customized kidney gene panel (675 genes). The pathogenicity was assessed using American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. We included 230 adult patients, median age 47.5 years. Consanguinity was reported by 25 patients. A family history of kidney disease was documented in 115 patients (50%). Kidney biopsies were either inconclusive in 69 patients (30.1%) or impossible in 71 (30.9%). We detected 28 monogenic renal disorders in 75 (32.6%) patients. Collagenopathies was the most common genetic kidney diagnosis (46.7%), with COL4A3 and COL4A4 accounting for 80% of these diagnoses. Tubulopathies (16%) and ciliopathies (14.7%) yielded, respectively, the second and third genetic kidney diagnosis category and UMOD-associated nephropathy as the main genetic findings for tubulopathies (7/11). Ten of the 22 patients having ES "first" eventually received a positive diagnosis, thereby avoiding 11 biopsies. Among the 44 patients with glomerular, tubulo-interstitial or vascular nephropathy, 13 (29.5%) were phenocopies. The diagnostic yield of ES was higher in female patients (P=.02) and in patients with a family history of kidney disease (P<.0001), reaching 56.8% when the patient had both first- and second-degree family history of renal disease. Genetic diagnosis has provided new clinical insights by clarifying or reclassifying kidney disease etiology in over a third of UKD patients. Exome "first" may have a significant positive diagnostic yield, thus avoiding invasive kidney biopsy; moreover, the diagnostic yield remains elevated even when biopsy is impossible or inconclusive. ES provides a clinical benefit for routine nephrological healthcare in patients with UKD.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in isolated fetal growth restriction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was todetermine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR). This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Selected studies included those with (a) only fetuses with FGR in the absence of fetal structural anomalies and (b) negative CMA or karyotyping results. Only positive variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic determined as causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. Eight studies with data on ES diagnostic yield, including 146 fetuses with isolated FGR, were identified. Overall, a pathogenic variant determined as potentially causative of the fetal phenotype was found in 17 cases, resulting in a 12% (95% CI: 7%-18%) incremental performance pool of ES. The vast majority were studied before 32 weeks'gestation. In conclusion, a monogenic disorder was prenatally found in association with apparently isolated FGR in 12% of these fetuses.

Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Cerebral Palsy and Implications for Genetic Testing Guidelines

Exome sequencing is a first-tier diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability/developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder; however, this recommendation does not include cerebral palsy. To evaluate if the diagnostic yield of exome or genome sequencing in cerebral palsy is similar to that of other neurodevelopmental disorders. The study team searched PubMed for studies published between 2013 and 2022 using cerebral palsy and genetic testing terms. Data were analyzed during March 2022. Studies performing exome or genome sequencing in at least 10 participants with cerebral palsy were included. Studies with fewer than 10 individuals and studies reporting variants detected by other genetic tests were excluded. Consensus review was performed. The initial search identified 148 studies, of which 13 met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted by 2 investigators and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Incidence rates with corresponding 95% CIs and prediction intervals were calculated. Publication bias was evaluated by the Egger test. Variability between included studies was assessed via heterogeneity tests using the I2 statistic. The primary outcome was the pooled diagnostic yield (rate of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants) across studies. Subgroup analyses were performed based on population age and on the use of exclusion criteria for patient selection. Thirteen studies were included consisting of 2612 individuals with cerebral palsy. The overall diagnostic yield was 31.1% (95% CI, 24.2%-38.6%; I2 = 91%). The yield was higher in pediatric populations (34.8%; 95% CI, 28.3%-41.5%) than adult populations (26.9%; 95% CI, 1.2%-68.8%) and higher among studies that used exclusion criteria for patient selection (42.1%; 95% CI, 36.0%-48.2%) than those that did not (20.7%; 95% CI, 12.3%-30.5%). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the genetic diagnostic yield in cerebral palsy was similar to that of other neurodevelopmental disorders for which exome sequencing is recommended as standard of care. Data from this meta-analysis provide evidence to support the inclusion of cerebral palsy in the current recommendation of exome sequencing in the diagnostic evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Exome sequencing in fetuses with short long bones detected by ultrasonography: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Prenatal diagnosis of fetal short long bones (SLBs) was reported to be associated with skeletal dysplasias, chromosomal abnormalities, and genetic syndromes. This study aims to identify the genetic causes for fetal short long bones, and retrospectively evaluate the additional diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) for short long bones following the use of conventional genetic testing. Methods: A cohort of ninety-four fetuses with sonographically identified short long bones was analyzed by trio-exome sequencing between January 2016 and June 2021. Fetuses with abnormal results of karyotype or chromosomal microarray analysis were excluded. Variants were interpreted based on ACMG/AMP guidelines. All diagnostic de novo variants were validated by Sanger sequencing. Results: Of the 94 fetuses, 38 (40.4%) were found to carry causal genetic variants (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) in sixteen genes with 38 variants. Five fetuses (5.3%) had variant(s) of uncertain significance. Thirty-five cases (37.2%) were diagnosed as genetic skeletal dysplasias including 14 different diseases that were classified into 10 groups according to the Nosology and Classification of Genetic Skeletal Disorders. The most common disease in the cohort was achondroplasia (28.9%), followed by osteogenesis imperfecta (18.4%), thanatophoric dysplasia (10.5%), chondrogenesis (7.9%), and 3-M syndrome (5.3%). The diagnostic yield in fetuses with isolated short long bones was lower than the fetuses with non-isolated short long bones, but not reached statistical significance (27.3% vs. 44.4%; p = 0.151). Whereas, the rate in the fetuses with other skeletal abnormalities was significantly higher than those with non-skeletal abnormalities (59.4% vs. 32.5%, p = 0.023), and the diagnostic rate was significantly higher in femur length (FL) below -4SDs group compared with FL 2-4SDs below GA group (72.5% vs. 16.7%; p < 0.001). A long-term follow-up showed that outcomes for fetuses with FL 2-4SDs below GA were significantly better than those with FL below -4SDs. Additionally, fourteen (36.8%) novel short long bones-related variants were identified in the present study. Conclusion: The findings suggest that in fetuses with short long bones routine genetic tests failed to determine the underlying causes, exome sequencing could add clinically relevant information that could assist the clinical management of pregnancies. Novel pathogenic variants identified may broaden the mutation spectrum for the disorders and contributes to clinical consultation and subsequent pregnancy examination.

Utilisation of exome sequencing for muscular disorders in Thai paediatric patients: diagnostic yield and mutational spectrum

Muscular dystrophies and congenital myopathies are heterogeneous groups of inherited muscular disorders. An accurate diagnosis is challenging due to their complex clinical presentations and genetic heterogeneity. This study aimed to determine the utilisation of exome sequencing (ES) for Thai paediatric patients with muscular disorders. Of 176 paediatric patients suspected of genetic/inherited myopathies, 133 patients received a molecular diagnosis after performing conventional investigations, single gene testing, and gene panels. The remaining 43 patients from 42 families could be classified into three groups: Group 1, MLPA-negative Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with 9 patients (9/43; 21%), Group 2, other muscular dystrophies (MD) with 18 patients (18/43; 42%) and Group 3, congenital myopathies (CM) with 16 patients (16/43; 37%). All underwent exome sequencing which could identify pathogenic variants in 8/9 (89%), 14/18 (78%), and 8/16 (50%), for each Group, respectively. Overall, the diagnostic yield of ES was 70% (30/43) and 36 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 14 genes were identified. 18 variants have never been previously reported. Molecular diagnoses provided by ES changed management in 22/30 (73%) of the patients. Our study demonstrates the clinical utility and implications of ES in inherited myopathies.