Diagnostic Criteria For Multiple Myeloma Research Articles

Asymptomatic skin lesions as a diagnostic clue in multiple myeloma – A case report

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare cancer of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Cutaneous plasmacytoma is an uncommon but specific skin lesion in MM with an incidence of 2%. Cutaneous plasma cell infiltration in pre-existing MM is a very rare phenomenon, with approximately 100 cases described in the literature. Here, we report a case of a 61-year-old male who presented with asymptomatic skin nodules and plaques over the chest, abdomen, and back of the trunk for five months. Histopathological examination showed mononuclear cells with moderate cytoplasm and round to ovoid nuclei. Immunohistochemistry showed CD138 and kappa positivity and lambda and CD20 negativity, confirming the diagnosis of cutaneous plasmacytoma. Bone marrow biopsy and immunohistochemistry revealed bone marrow plasmacytosis with kappa light chain restriction. Serum free light chain ratio was 106.61 and fluorescence in situ hybridization showed del 13q. The clinical features and investigations fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for MM, and the patient was started on chemotherapy, following which the skin lesions improved. Development of skin lesions is seen in the advanced stages of MM and is considered a bad prognostic sign. However, they can also be seen as initial manifestations of the disease, as in this case. Hence, meticulous investigations and early diagnosis are of paramount importance.

Risk Stratification Models Overestimate Progression Risk in Contemporary Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)

Introduction: SMM is an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM), affecting ~1 in 200 people aged >40 years. Historically, risk of progression from SMM to MM was 10% per year in the first 5 years. However, since then, the definition and characteristics of the SMM patient population have changed substantially. First, IMWG diagnostic criteria for MM in 2014 changed to include biomarker-only myeloma (SLiM), reclassifying asymptomatic patients previously considered SMM. Second, incorporation of advanced imaging (CT, PET/CT, MRI) identified bone disease with greater sensitivity. Hence, we hypothesized that in the contemporary era, the risk of progression from SMM to MM would be markedly lower than historically. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with SMM at Columbia University Irving Medical Center from 2014-2022 and observed without therapeutic intervention. Our primary objective was to measure cumulative incidence of progression to MM and to characterize progression events. We also calculated predicted 2-year risk of progression by different risk-stratification models (Mayo 20/2/20, PANGEA, IMWG SMM model) in our cohort. Results: 102 consecutive patients with SMM were included. Median year of diagnosis was 2019 (range, 2014-2022). Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the cohort are shown in Table 1. The three most common scenarios that led to SMM diagnosis were workup of anemia/cytopenias(s) (n=22; 21.8%), incidental protein gap or elevated immunoglobulin level (n=20; 19.8%), and renal dysfunction (n=16; 15.8%). The racial/ethnic makeup of our study cohort was 38% Hispanic/Latino, 38% Non-Hispanic White, 19% Black/African-American, and 5% Asian. Bone disease was ruled out by advanced imaging (whole body CT, PET/CT, WB-MRI, and/or MRI spine+ pelvis) in 81.2% of patients. The most common abnormality on FISH was hyperdiploidy (39.2%), followed by t(11;14) (22.1%), with ≥1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality (HRCA) in 35% of patients. Median follow-up was 45 months (95% CI, 34-52). 22/102 patients (21.6%) progressed to symptomatic plasma cell dyscrasia: CRAB myeloma in 18, SLiM myeloma in 1, systemic AL amyloidosis in 3 patients. The cumulative incidence of progression to MM (CRAB/SLiM) at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years from SMM diagnosis was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.99-9.1), 7.7% (95% CI, 3.7-15.3), 13.9% (95% CI, 8.1-23.1), and 17.1% (95% CI, 10.3-27.1) respectively [Figure 1]. Notably, presence of HRCA by FISH had a dose-dependent increase in risk of progression, with the 2-year risk being 75% (95% CI, 24-97%) in patients with ≥2 HRCA vs 13.0% (95% CI, 5.9-26.3) in those with 0-1 HRCA respectively ( p=0.0049). Among 18 patients who progressed to CRAB myeloma, the myeloma-defining event/s (MDEs) were anemia in 11, anemia + bone disease in 4, and bone disease in 3 patients. Among patients with a bone disease MDE, 4/7 had >1 lytic lesions on imaging and 3 had vertebral compression fracture(s). No patient had renal insufficiency or hypercalcemia as MDE. The sole patient with SLiM had a serum free light chain ratio>100 as the only MDE. 13/102 patients (12.75%) died, with 4/13 deaths attributed to myeloma after disease progression. The predicted median 2-year risk of progression to MM with different risk-stratification models were as follows: PANGEA with Bone Marrow (BM): 5.75% (range, 1.2-42); PANGEA without BM: 4.6% (0.7-26.6); Mayo 20/2/20: 9.7% (9.7-47.4); IMWG SMM: 26% (3.8-73). Figure 2 shows Sankey diagram of predicted risk tertiles for patients at SMM diagnosis by different models. Notably, a substantial proportion of high-risk patients by 20/2/20, who are currently considered for therapeutic intervention, were re-assigned to intermediate risk (2-year risk of progression 8.1-20%) by PANGEA-BM. Conclusion: The risk of progression to MM among this cohort of contemporary patients with SMM is <5% per year for the 1 st 4 years, which is substantially lower than the historical rate of 10% per year. Morbid progression such as renal failure or fractures are very infrequent, with anemia being the most common MDE. Prospective studies testing active surveillance strategies are needed in contemporary SMM cohorts to determine the optimal approach to these patients and ensure balancing of potential risks and benefits of treatment.

AL Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma: A Complex Scenario in Which Cardiac Involvement Remains the Key Prognostic Factor.

Monoclonal gammopathies (MGs) are a wide range of diseases that may evolve or progress over time. Comorbidity plays a critical role in this setting. The co-occurrence of two MGs is not a rare event. The evidence on the association of systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis and multiple myeloma (MM) is scarce and controversial. Herein we aim to address this topic in a large series of patients of a referral center. All consecutive AL amyloidosis patients treated at our center from January 2005 to April 2023 were prospectively enrolled in a clinical and epidemiological registry. 141 patients diagnosed with AL amyloidosis were included, of which 7 (5%) had localized whereas 134 presented with systemic disease. The heart was the most frequently affected organ (90.3%). 25 patients (18.7%) fulfilled the IMWG diagnostic criteria of MM (AL/MM). Time-dependent association between AL and MM showed that the synchronous pattern is more frequent than the appearance of a second primary malignancy. The diagnostic delay was six months (m). Patients with AL/MM had a poorer median overall survival (OS) than AL-only patients (35.5 m, CI 95% 0-88.9, vs. 52.6 m, CI 95% 16.7-88.5), but this difference was not statistically significant. The prognosis in AL is dominated by the heart involvement, which is massive in this series. In our Cox regression model, only three prognostic variables remain as independent prognostic factors: age, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (≥8500 ng/L), and undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction shows a marginal effect. More and large studies focusing on the AL/MM association are needed to uncover the characteristics and prognostic impact of this association.

Non-crystalline light chain proximal tubulopathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: A case report and review of the literature.

Light chain proximal tubulopathy (LCPT) is a rare M-proteinemia-related nephropathy. Non-crystalline LCPT is even rarer. We herein report an unusual case of renal dysfunction and proteinuria due to κ-restricted and non-crystalline LCPT in a context of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) without Fanconi syndrome (FS). A 67-year-old man was admitted for a 2-year history of proteinuria and renal dysfunction. Fanconi syndrome (FS) was not observed. He was noted to have IgG-κ M protein, and the previous bone marrow biopsy revealed that atypical plasma cells accounted for 1.5% of the cells, which did not meet the diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma. A renal biopsy revealed proximal tubular injury, including increased lysosomes with irregular contours and a mottled appearance without crystalline structure and the accumulation of κ light chains. He was diagnosed with non-crystalline LCPT with MGRS. Concurrently, we reviewed the non-crystalline LCPT cases previously published in the literature. Our patient finally received chemotherapy with a bortezomib and dexamethasone regimen. The patient did not seem to achieve evident nephrological and hematological remission after chemotherapy, but he was in a stable condition. Very few similar cases are reported in the literature. It is considered crucial to enhance our knowledge about these cases to establish the definition of the non-crystalline LCPT entity and allow for early diagnosis. Chemotherapy may not be necessary for all patients to maintain good renal function. Future prospective clinical research studies are necessary.

Subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA SC) versus active monitoring in patients (pts) with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM): Randomized, open-label, phase 3 AQUILA study.

TPS8075 Background: Standard of care for SMM includes active monitoring until progression to multiple myeloma (MM); however, recent evidence suggests pts with high-risk features may benefit from early treatment. DARA is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 that is approved as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) or in combination with standard of care for RRMM or newly diagnosed MM. Results from the phase 3 COLUMBA study showed that DARA SC demonstrated similar efficacy to intravenous (IV) DARA but with a lower rate of infusion-related reactions and shorter administration time. Based on the promising single-agent activity observed with IV DARA in intermediate- or high-risk SMM pts during the phase 2 CENTAURUS study, we hypothesized that DARA SC may delay progression to MM versus active monitoring in pts with high-risk SMM. Methods: AQUILA is an ongoing, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study of DARA SC versus active monitoring in pts with high-risk SMM. DARA SC (DARA 1,800 mg + recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; 2,000 U/mL; Halozyme]) is administered by manual injection over approximately 5 minutes at alternating locations on the abdomen weekly in Cycles 1 and 2, every 2 weeks in Cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter until 39 cycles (28 days/cycle), up to 36 months, or until disease progression. Eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of SMM for ≤5 years, factors indicating high risk of progression to MM (clonal bone marrow plasma cells [BMPCs] ≥10% and ≥1 of the following: serum M protein ≥30 g/L, IgA SMM, immunoparesis with reduction of 2 uninvolved Ig isotypes, serum involved:uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥8 to < 100, or clonal BMPCs > 50% to < 60% with measurable disease), and ECOG performance status ≤1. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee, with disease progression defined according to International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria for MM. Secondary endpoints include time to biochemical or diagnostic (SLiM-CRAB) progression, overall response rate, complete response rate, duration of response, time to response, time to first-line treatment for MM, PFS on first-line treatment for MM (PFS2), overall survival, and incidence of MM with adverse prognostic features. The study completed enrollment on May 6, 2019; 390 pts have been randomly assigned to DARA SC or active monitoring. The primary efficacy analysis will be performed after approximately 165 PFS events have been observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03301220.

Clinical Considerations for Immunoparesis in Multiple Myeloma.

Simple SummaryImmunoparesis in multiple myeloma is defined as the suppression of one or more of the uninvolved immunoglobulins, AKA, polyclonal immunoglobulin. The extent of immunoparesis is an independent prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Myeloma patients with suppressed uninvolved immunoglobulins at diagnosis have shorter median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). This review article summarizes immunoparesis in myeloma patients, contributing factors, its impact on myeloma progression, general outcomes, and infectious complications.Multiple myeloma is a relatively common clonal plasma cell disorder, comprising 17% of hematologic malignancies. One of the hallmark features of this disease is immunoparesis, which is characterized by the suppression of immunoglobulin polyclonality. Though not entirely elucidated, the mechanism behind this process can be attributed to the changes in the tumor microenvironment. All treating clinicians must consider potential complications related to immunoparesis in the management of multiple myeloma. Though not explicitly described in large data series, the increased risk of infection in multiple myeloma is likely, at least in part, due to immunoglobulin suppression. Additionally, the presence of immunoparesis serves as a prognostic factor, conveying poorer survival and a higher risk of relapse. Even in the era of novel agents, these findings are preserved, and immunoglobulin recovery also serves as a sign of improved outcome following autologous HSCT. Though not within the diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma, the presence and degree of immunoparesis should be at diagnosis for prognostication, and immunoglobulin recovery should be tracked following myeloablative therapy and autologous HSCT.

Single-Center Real-World Experience of Multiple Myeloma in the 21st Century

Background/Aims: The incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) in Korea is rapidly increasing. The diagnostic criteria of MM have been updated and novel therapeutic agents are available. This study explored the features of MM patients registered at Asan Medical Center (AMC) and the outcomes over the past 15 years.Methods: Data were obtained from the AMC MM registry, which has been collecting the data of MM patients prospectively. The 774 MM patients included in our analysis were diagnosed from 2003, when thalidomide became available as a novel therapeutic agent, until April 2019. The 2-year survival rate of these patients was assessed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they were older or younger than 65 years, which is the cutoff age for the indication of autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients were also grouped according to the year of diagnosis: up to 2006, when bortezomib became available, and up to 2010, when the cost of lenalidomide was reimbursed.Results: Patients < 65 years of age had better prognostic features, including a better performance, less advanced disease stage, and fewer abnormalities in their fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) analysis results. A comparison of our Korean patients with patients registered in the Myeloma Related Disorder Registry data of Australia and New Zealand, showed ethnic discrepancies. The median overall survival of all patients was 3.7 years, with a 5-year survival rate of 41.8% and a 10-year survival rate of 23.4%. Survival progressively improved in patients diagnosed later. Age, performance status, renal function, C-reactive protein level, lactate dehydrogenase level, and cytogenetic findings were identified as significant prognostic factors.Conclusions: This real-world survey revealed the clinical features and survival rates of patients at a tertiary Korean Hospital who were diagnosed with MM at the beginning of 21st century.

Light Chain Restriction in Proximal Tubules-Implications for Light Chain Proximal Tubulopathy.

Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) causes various nephropathies, which may suffice for cytoreductive therapy even in the absence of diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The aim of this study was to better understand the significance of light chain (LC) restriction or crystals (LC-R/C) in proximal tubules in the spectrum of LC-induced nephropathies. A consecutive cohort of 320 renal specimens with a history of B-cell dyscrasia was characterized. Special attention was paid to immunohistochemical LC restriction in proximal tubules, tubular crystals or constipation, and ultrastructural findings. Complementary cell culture experiments were performed to assess the role of LC concentrations in generating LC restriction. Light chain restriction or crystals in proximal tubules was found in a quarter of analyzed cases (81/316) and was associated with another LC-induced disease in 70.4% (57/81), especially LC cast-nephropathy (cast-NP) and interstitial myeloma infiltration. LC restriction without significant signs of acute tubular injury was observed in 11.1% (9/81). LC-R/C was not associated with inferior renal function compared to the remainder of cases, when cases with accompanying cast-NP were excluded. Besides crystals, cloudy lysosomes were significantly associated with LC-R/C on an ultrastructural level. In summary, LC-R/C is frequent and strongly associated with cast-NP, possibly indicating that a high load of clonal LC is responsible for this phenomenon, supported by the observation that LC restriction can artificially be generated in cell culture. This and the lack of significant tubular injury in a subgroup imply that in part LC-R/C is a tubular trafficking phenomenon rather than an independent disease process.

Imaging for Multiple Myeloma according to the Recent International Myeloma Working Group Guidelines: Analysis of Image Acquisition Techniques and Response Evaluation in Whole-Body MRI according to MY-RADS

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant hematologic disease caused by the proliferation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow, and its incidence is increasing in Korea. With the development of treatments for MM, the need for early diagnosis and treatment has emerged. In recent years, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) has been constantly revising the laboratory and radiological diagnostic criteria for MM. In addition, as whole-body MRI (WBMR) has been increasing used in the diagnosis and treatment response evaluation of patients with MM, the Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS) was created to standardize WBMR image acquisition techniques, image interpretation, and response evaluation methods. Radiologists need to have a detailed knowledge of the features of MM for accurate diagnosis. Thus, in this review article, we describe the imaging method for MM according to the latest IMWG guidelines as well as the image acquisition and response evaluation technique for WBMR according to MY-RADS.

Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) has a consistently ominous prognosis, even after progress in the last decades. PCL deserves a prompt identification to start the most effective treatment for this ultra-high-risk disease. The aim of this position paper is to revisit the diagnosis of PCL according to the presence of circulating plasma cells in patients otherwise meeting diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma. We could identify two retrospective series where the question about what number of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood should be used for defining PCL. The presence of ≥5% circulating plasma cells in patients with MM had a similar adverse prognostic impact as the previously defined PCL. Therefore, PCL should be defined by the presence of 5% or more circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears in patients otherwise diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: Early diagnosis is key

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance is a clinical–pathological entity grouping renal disorders secondary to the secretion of a monoclonal immunoglobulin synthesized by a B-cell-derived clone and/or plasma cells in a patient with no diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma. This term applies to a concept recently introduced owing to the need to differentiate this entity from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, given the negative prognostic impact of its high morbidity and mortality resulting from both renal and systemic involvement, occasionally even progressing to advanced chronic kidney disease. The renal damage occurs via both direct pathogenic mechanisms, with the deposition of the monoclonal protein in different renal structures, as well as indirect mechanisms, acting as an autoantibody provoking dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. The detection of this monoclonal protein and an early hematologic study are essential, as is the need for a kidney biopsy to establish the associated nephropathological diagnosis. Consequently, this then leads to the start of specific hematologic treatment to detain the production of the monoclonal protein and minimize renal and systemic injury.

Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Very Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The majority of patients with MM are diagnosed over the age of 65 and 37% are over the age of 75 (Van de Donk and Sonneveld, 2014). As treatment outcomes and survival improve across age groups for patients with MM (Libby, et al. 2013), more elderly patients are potential candidates for ASCT. Elderly patients have been defined as greater than age 65 in many studies of ASCT, but as referral age for transplantation continues to increase, the ASCT outcomes of patients 75 years and older need to be elucidated.Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 24 patients age 75 or older received ASCT for MM. High-risk disease (HRD) was defined as t(14;16), t(14;20), del 17p, t(4;14) or 1q gain by FISH, del 13q, monosomy 13 or hypodiploidy by standard cytogenetics, or high risk signature gene expression profiling. Patients were mobilized for peripheral blood stem cell collection with either a cyclophosphamide-based mobilization chemotherapy regimen with GSCF (Cy-G), plerixafor and GCSF (Pler-G), or with GCSF alone. Conditioning regimens were melphalan based, with patients receiving either 140 mg/m2 (Mel 140) or 200 mg/m2 (Mel 200). Response criteria was based on the International Working Group Diagnostic Criteria for MM. Outcomes reported included disease response, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and cause of death.Results: The ages ranged from 75 to 84 years and 71% were male. HRD at diagnosis was reported for 8 patients (33%). Twenty patients (83%) were in a partial response (PR) or better at time of transplantation, with 1 patient in a complete response (CR), 10 patients (42%) in a very good partial response (VGPR), and 9 patients (37%) in a PR. No patient had progressive disease at the time of ASCT and 4 patients (17%) had stable disease (SD). Twelve patients (50%) received Cy-G for stem cell mobilization, 11 (49%) received Pler-G, and 1 patient received GCSF alone. Five patients received Mel 140 and 19 patients received Mel 200, 21% and 79% respectively. Best response post ASCT was CR in 10 patients (42%), VGPR in 5 patients (21%), PR in 4 patients (17%) and 2 patients (8%) had SD. There were 2 early deaths prior to day 100 post ASCT. One patient died of a subdural hematoma at day +11 and the other patient died of a staphylococcus aureus sepsis at day +25. PFS was 40% at 5 years and OS was 56% at 5 years. There was no difference in OS (p=0.1511) for patients age 75 and older at the time of transplantation compared to patients younger than age 75 (n=472).Conclusions: ASCT for very elderly patients 75 years or older is feasible and can result in long-term survival. Elderly patients can tolerate chemotherapy for mobilization and doses of melphalan 200 mg/m2 for conditioning. Elderly patients with MM should not be denied ASCT based on age alone. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMcKiernan:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Siegel:Celgene, Takeda, Amgen Inc, Novartis and BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Vesole:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: Ad board, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Biran:Celgene, Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Richter:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Pecora:Caladrius Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; COTA: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Goy:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics / J&J: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: Early diagnosis is key

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance is a clinical–pathological entity grouping renal disorders secondary to the secretion of a monoclonal immunoglobulin synthesized by a B-cell-derived clone and/or plasma cells in a patient with no diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma. This term applies to a concept recently introduced owing to the need to differentiate this entity from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, given the negative prognostic impact of its high morbidity and mortality resulting from both renal and systemic involvement, occasionally even progressing to advanced chronic kidney disease. The renal damage occurs via both direct pathogenic mechanisms, with the deposition of the monoclonal protein in different renal structures, as well as indirect mechanisms, acting as an autoantibody provoking dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. The detection of this monoclonal protein and an early hematologic study are essential, as is the need for a kidney biopsy to establish the associated nephropathological diagnosis. Consequently, this then leads to the start of specific hematologic treatment to detain the production of the monoclonal protein and minimize renal and systemic injury.

Comparison of Conventional Xrays with CT Based Approaches for Detection of Lytic Lesions in Multiple Myeloma

Comparison of Conventional Xrays with CT Based Approaches for Detection of Lytic Lesions in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma – 2020 update on diagnosis and management

There has been remarkable progress made in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). The median survival of the disease has doubled as a result of several new active drugs. These advances have necessitated a revision of the disease definition and staging of MM. Until recently, MM was defined by the presence of end-organ damage, specifically hypercalcemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions (CRAB features) that can be attributed to the clonal process. In 2014, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updated the diagnostic criteria for MM to add three specific biomarkers that can be used to diagnose the disease in patients who did not have CRAB features: clonal bone marrow plasma cells greater than or equal to 60%, serum free light chain (FLC) ratio greater than or equal to 100 provided involved FLC level is 100 mg/l or higher, or more than one focal lesion on MRI. In addition, the definition was revised to allow CT and PET-CT to diagnose MM bone disease. With the introduction of immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs), major improvements have been achieved in the treatment and outcome of MM. Different treatment combinations are now in use and newer the­rapies are being developed. However, nearly all MM patients ultimately relapse, even those who experience a complete response to initial therapy. Management of the relapsed disease remains a critical aspect of MM care and an important area of ongoing research. The aim of this review is to summarise the current methods of diagnosis and treatment of MM.

Update on Risk Stratification Model of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review

Background: Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) was stratified into risk classes based on several models including Mayo clinic and Spanish myeloma working group models. After the revision of diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma (MM) in 2014, the ultra-high risk SMM patients (>80% clonal plasma cells at two years) were re-classified as active MM patients. Thus, predictors of progression in patients currently diagnosed as SMM are unknown and reassessment of existing models is required. We aim to identify the risk factors associated with progression in SMM patients classified according to updated guidelines. Methods We performed a literature search following PRISMA guidelines and used following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), as well as annual meetings abstracts from inception till 1st,August 2019. We used MeSH and Emtree terms as well as performed open search for "smoldering multiple myeloma", "smoldering myeloma", and "asymptomatic multiple myeloma". Two independent reviewers screened the literature. We used snowballing technique to screen abstracts and reference within articles to include titles. Cochrane collaboration tool was used to asses risk of bias among included studies Results Our search retrieved 419 titles. After going through the titles and abstracts 38 articles were selected for full text review. Final review led to inclusion of 11 articles. Levels of serum M proteins, percentage of bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), serum free light chain ratio (FLCr) and PET/CT scan findings of whole body were most consistently and reliably indicated the progression of SMM to MM (Table 1). New studies are suggesting that B-cell maturation levels (BCMA), evolving M-proteins (eMP) and evolving hemoglobin levels (eHb) are also an accurate measure of SMM progression and should be incorporated in the risk stratification models. A study by Gonsalves WI et al. also suggested that levels of circulating clonal plasma cells with a cutoff of 150 was an important prognostic marker in their study. Immunoparesis status and role of Bence Jones proteins in reliably predicting the progression of SMM was debatable because they were significant in univariate analysis but were not significant in multivariate analysis (Table 1). Conclusion Serum M protein levels (2 g/dL), percentage of BMPCs (20%), serum FLCr (20) and PET/CT scan were reliable in predicting the prognosis of smoldering MM. New techniques like B-cell maturation levels(74.4 ng/mL), evolving M-proteins and evolving hemoglobin levels can play a significant role in proposing future risk predictive models of SMM. Role of immunoparesis and Bence Jones proteins is debatable. Table 1 Disclosures Anwer: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau.

Evaluation and Dilution Verification of the Optilite FreeliteTM Assay show discordant results at high serum free light chain concentrations

The International Myeloma Working Group updated diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders recommend the use of serum-free light chains (sFLCs), with the ratio of involved to uninvolved sFLC>100 constituting a myeloma defining event. sFLCs also have utility in screening, prognosis, monitoring response to therapy, and recurrence. The Binding Site Freelite assay is the only sFLC assay currently included in national and international guidelines. The study objective was to evaluate the analytical performance of the Freelite assay on the Binding Site Optilite platform, with particular attention to dilution inaccuracies that may lead to clinical misinterpretation of sFLC results.

An approach to the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell dyscrasia that accounts for ~10% of haematological malignancies. It is a disease of the elderly, with a slight male predominance. Almost all cases of MM are preceded by an asymptomatic, premalignant phase known as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). The clinical presentation of MM may be nonspecific, with the most common presenting symptoms being fatigue, bone pain and anaemia. The diagnostic criteria for MM were revised in 2014 to include 3 specific biomarkers of malignancy that are associated with an increased risk of target organ damage. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in the management of MM. The introduction of immunomodulatory agents and proteasome inhibitors has significantly improved the survival of patients with MM. Autologous stem cell transplantation remains the standard of care in younger, fit patients, where there is also a clear role for maintenance chemotherapy. Transplant-ineligible patients benefit from a prolonged induction therapy, and the role of maintenance therapy in this setting is still unclear. Despite major advances in therapy, MM remains an incurable malignant condition and novel agents such as monoclonal antibodies play an important role, especially in the elderly and patients who have relapsed.

Whole-Body Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Diagnostic Criteria.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell proliferative disorder characterized by primary infiltration of bone marrow and excessive production of abnormal immunoglobulin. This disease is the second most common hematologic malignancy (after lymphoma), and its spectrum of characteristic features are widely known by the acronym CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal impairment, anemia, and bone lesions). Traditionally, the diagnosis and treatment of MM have been triggered by clear end-organ damage. However, owing to recently introduced treatment options that can extend patient survival and the increasing recognition of biomarkers that can be used to identify patients at high risk of progression to active disease, the diagnostic criteria have been revised. Bone disease is one of the most prominent features of MM, and imaging has an important role in diagnosis and follow-up, with each whole-body imaging modality having different indications in distinct disease situations. Skeletal survey has been the standard imaging procedure used during the past decade, but it should no longer be used unless it is the only option. Whole-body low-dose CT is a reasonable and cost-effective initial imaging approach. Whole-body MRI is the most sensitive technique for detecting bone involvement and assessing painful complications. PET/CT is the best tool for evaluating treatment response. The importance of radiologists has increased in this scenario. Therefore, to properly assist hematologists and improve the care of patients with MM, it is essential that radiologists know the updated diagnostic criteria for MM, indications for and limitations of each imaging option, and recommendations for follow-up. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2019.

Correlation between expressions of stromal cell-derived factor 1α and osteoprotegerin and bone disease in multiple myeloma

Objective To understand the correlation of expression levels of serum stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and β2 microglobulin (β2-MG) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with or without myeloma bone disease (MBD). Methods Eighty patients with MM who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from January 2014 to June 2017 were selected; all of the patients met the international diagnostic criteria for MM. According to the symptoms such as bone pain, the patients were divided into group with MBD (45 cases) and group without MBD (35 cases). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the serum levels of SDF-1α and OPG, and radioimmunoassay was used to detect the expression of MM major prognostic indicator β2-MG. The MBD score was evaluated in 45 patients selected by random number table after sacroiliac joint X-ray and three-dimensional bone reconstruction. The χ 2 test was used to compare the categorical variables; the two independent sample t-test was used to compare the continuous variables that conformed to the normal distribution between two groups, and the Pearson method was used for the correlation analysis. Results The expression level of serum SDF-1α in the group with MBD was significantly higher than that in the group without MBD [0.31±0.17) pg/ml vs. (0.18±0.06) pg/ml], and the difference was statistically significant (t=-4.21, P < 0.001). The expression level of serum OPG in the group with MBD was significantly lower than that in the group without MBD [(0.73±0.50) pg/ml vs. (1.08±0.31) pg/ml], and the difference was statistically significant (t= 3.62, P < 0.001). Pearson analysis showed that β2-MG level in the group was positively correlated with SDF-1α level (r= 0.84, P < 0.001), and negatively correlated with OPG level (r=-0.48, P < 0.001). The β2-MG level in the group without MBD did not show a correlation with the SDF-1α and OPG levels. Conclusions In the serum of patients with MBD, the expression levels of β2-MG and SDF-1α are increased, and the expression level of OPG is decreased. SDF-1α and OPG may be new clinical biochemical indicators for diagnosis, treatment and prognosis assessment in MBD. Key words: Multiple myeloma; Myeloma bone disease; Stromal cell-derived factor; Osteoprotegerin; β2 microglobulin