Diagnostic Accuracy For Liver Fibrosis Research Articles

Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score for Diagnosing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis.

Background and aims: The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score is a blood test that combines three markers linked to liver fibrosis. The utility of the ELF score has been demonstrated primarily in Western countries, but whether it is useful in areas with a high number of elderly people suffering from chronic liver disease has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a prospective study that included 373 consecutive patients who underwent a liver biopsy and had their ELF score measured on the same day. The diagnostic accuracy of the ELF score for liver fibrosis and the effect of age on the ELF score were investigated. Results: The median (interquartile) ELF scores in F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 are 8.7 (8.2-9.2), 9.3 (8.8-10.0), 10.1 (9.4-10.7), 10.7 (9.9-11.2), and 12.0 (11.2-12.7), respectively. ELF scores increased with increasing liver fibrosis stage (p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the ELF score and FIB-4 for significant fibrosis (F2-4) and advanced fibrosis (F3-4) was comparable, but the ELF score had a higher diagnostic accuracy for cirrhosis (F4) than FIB-4. When patients were stratified by age of 60 years, the median ELF score did not differ by age in F2, F3, and F4. However, the median FIB-4 increased in patients with ≥60 years compared to those with <60 years in all fibrosis stages. Conclusions: ELF score has high diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis, regardless of age, and it could be used as a primary screening method.

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and its clinical significance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Liver fibrosis is the most important prognostic factor in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several noninvasive markers for fibrosis, including blood-based markers and imaging based-markers have been developed. Indirect fibrosis markers (e.g., fibrosis-4 index and NAFLD fibrosis score) consist of standard laboratory data and clinical parameters. Given its availability and high negative predictive value for advanced fibrosis, these markers are suitable for screening at primary care. Blood-based fibrogenesis markers (enhanced liver fibrosis and N-terminal propeptide of type 3 collagen), ultrasound-based modalities (vibration-controlled transient elastography, point shear wave elastography [SWE], and two-dimensional SWE), and magnetic resonance elastography have high diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis and are suitable for diagnosing liver fibrosis at secondary care centers. Sequential use of these markers can increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce health care costs. Furthermore, combining noninvasive makers may assist in identifying candidates for pharmacological trials and reducing screening failure. Emerging data suggest that these noninvasive markers are associated with liver-related events (hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensation) and mortality. Furthermore, delta change in noninvasive markers over time is also associated with time-course change in fibrosis, liver-related event risk, and mortality risk. However, the association between liver fibrosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is still controversial. CVD risk may decrease in patients with decompensated liver disease and noninvasive markers may be useful for assessing CVD risk in these patients. Therefore, noninvasive markers may be utilized as measures of fibrosis as well as real-time prognostic tools, in place of liver biopsy.

Longitudinal association of magnetic resonance elastography-associated liver stiffness with complications and mortality.

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has the highest diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis; however, the association between MRE-associated liver stiffness and the development of hepatic and extrahepatic complications as well as mortality remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the longitudinal association between MRE-associated liver stiffness and complications and mortality. This retrospective study included 2373 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease. All patients received standard of care and the development of complications was assessed every 1-6months. Newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), decompensation, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), extrahepatic cancer and death were observed in 99, 117, 73, 77 and 170 patients respectively. In multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for HCC, decompensation, MACE, extrahepatic cancer and mortality were 1.28 (1.2-1.4), 1.34 (1.3-1.4), 0.96 (0.9-1.1), 1.00 (0.9-1.1) and 1.17 (1.1-1.2), respectively, with each 1-kPa increase in liver stiffness. Similarly, the aHR (95% CI) for HCC, decompensation, MACE, extrahepatic cancer and mortality were 4.20 (2.2-8.2), 67.5 (9.2-492), 0.83 (0.4-1.7), 0.90 (0.5-1.7) and 2.90 (1.6-5.4), respectively, in patients with cirrhosis (>4.7kPa) compared to those with minimal fibrosis (<3kPa). Increased MRE-associated liver stiffness was associated with increased risk for HCC, decompensation and mortality in a dose-dependent fashion but not with MACE or extrahepatic cancer, implicating a significant role for MRE in liver-related events and mortality; however, further studies are warranted to explore its role in MACE and extrahepatic cancer.

Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), point shear wave elastography (pSWE), 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2DSWE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been proposed as non-invasive tests for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study evaluated their diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). PubMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of these index tests, against histology as the reference standard, in adult patients with NAFLD. Two authors independently screened and assessed methodological quality of studies and extracted data. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (sAUC) were calculated for fibrosis stages and NASH, using a random effects bivariate logit-normal model. We included 82 studies (14,609 patients). Meta-analysis for diagnosing fibrosis stages was possible in 53 VCTE, 11 MRE, 12 pSWE and 4 2DSWE studies, and for diagnosing NASH in 4 MRE studies. sAUC for diagnosis of significant fibrosis were: 0.83 for VCTE, 0.91 for MRE, 0.86 for pSWE and 0.75 for 2DSWE. sAUC for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis were: 0.85 for VCTE, 0.92 for MRE, 0.89 for pSWE and 0.72 for 2DSWE. sAUC for diagnosis of cirrhosis were: 0.89 for VCTE, 0.90 for MRE, 0.90 for pSWE and 0.88 for 2DSWE. MRE had sAUC of 0.83 for diagnosis of NASH. Three (4%) studies reported intention-to-diagnose analyses and 15 (18%) studies reported diagnostic accuracy against pre-specified cut-offs. When elastography index tests are acquired successfully, they have acceptable diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The potential clinical impact of these index tests cannot be assessed fully as intention-to-diagnose analyses and validation of pre-specified thresholds are lacking. Non-invasive tests that measure liver stiffness or use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been suggested as alternatives to liver biopsy for assessing the severity of liver scarring (fibrosis) and fatty inflammation (steatohepatitis) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In this study, we summarise the results of previously published studies on how accurately these non-invasive tests can diagnose liver fibrosis and inflammation, using liver biopsy as the reference. We found that some techniques that measure liver stiffness had a good performance for the diagnosis of severe liver scarring.

Controlled attenuation parameter value-based diagnostic algorithm improves the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) frequently overestimates the severity of liver fibrosis because of steatosis. However, the impact of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) on liver stiffness cutoff values remains unknown; CAP was used to quantify and diagnose the severity of hepatic steatosis. The study was conducted to determine the effect of CAP on liver stiffness cutoff values in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in liver biopsy-proven CHB patients. The median LSM (kPa) in the elevated CAP group was higher than that in the normal CAP group at the same fibrosis stage. For S2-4, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of LSM was 0.78 and 0.72 in the normal and elevated CAP groups, respectively. When a cutoff value of 8.9 kPa was used, the diagnostic accuracy was 77.82% and 63.41% in the normal and elevated CAP groups, respectively. Compared with the alanine transaminase (ALT)-based LSM algorithm, the CAP-based LSM algorithm had a similar correct diagnosis rate (33.64% vs. 33.94%, respectively) but a lower misdiagnosis rate (16.97% vs. 20.30%, respectively). The new CAP-based LSM diagnostic algorithm will improve the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis in CHB patients.

The diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis in non-viral liver diseases using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundAcoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is an ultrasound-based elastography method that has been studied in the staging of hepatic fibrosis, especially in chronic hepatitis. However, the diagnostic accuracy of ARFI in non-viral hepatopathies, such as autoimmune hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, has not been systematically determined.AimTo systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of ARFI in non-viral hepatopathies.MethodsThe databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for candidate studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of ARFI for hepatic fibrosis. The pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated with the summary receiver operating curve (sROC) performed using STATA software.ResultsIn detail, a total of 29 diagnostic studies were included for further analysis. The quality of the included studies was relatively high using QUADAS method. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (0.73, 0.83) and 0.81 (0.75, 0.86), with AUROC 0.87 (0.83, 0.89) for the staging of significant fibrosis (F≥2). Meanwhile, for the staging of severe fibrosis (F≥3), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (0.87, 0.95) and 0.85 (0.80, 0.89), with AUROC 0.94 (0.92, 0.96). Furthermore, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 (0.79, 0.95) and 0.89 (0.85, 0.92), with AUROC 0.94 (0.92, 0.96) for ARFI in staging cirrhosis (F = 4), which were similar to the data for severe fibrosis. No significant publication bias was present in this study.ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated that ARFI exerted satisfactory diagnostic performance in staging non-viral hepatic fibrosis, especially severe fibrosis (F≥3) and cirrhosis (F = 4).

A Novel Non-invasive Method for Predicting Liver Fibrosis by Quantifying the Hepatic Vein Waveform

The hepatic vein (HV) waveform by Doppler ultrasound reflects the severity of liver fibrosis. We conducted a proof-of-concept study of a new method for quantifying the HV waveform. We calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the HV flow velocity and created a new index “q-HV” (quantified HV) and analyzed its performance for predicting histologic liver fibrosis in 114 patients with chronic liver disease. The CV of the HV flow velocity was well associated with flattening of the waveform and the q-HV significantly increased with the progression of liver fibrosis. The areas under the curve for the prediction of fibrosis stage were 0.732 for F2, 0.772 for F3 and 0.805 for F4. Combined q-HV and FIB-4 index (widely used liver fibrosis score) increased the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis. The q-HV showed good accuracy for predicting liver fibrosis; thus, q-HV is feasible and acceptable as a non-invasive tool for predicting liver fibrosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio for predicting staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Red cell volume distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR), as a novel noninvasive assessment, is frequently investigated. However, the utility of RPR to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of RPR for detecting staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of RPR. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were also performed to identify factors that contributed to heterogeneity. The Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was applied to assess the quality. Fifteen studies with a total of 3346 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The area under the curve for SROC to summarize diagnostic accuracy of RPR for prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 0.73 (standard error [SE] = 0.02), 0.83 (SE = 0.03), and 0.85 (SE = 0.04), respectively. Pooled DOR with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 4.93 (95% CI: 3.78-6.43), 10.27 (95% CI: 6.26-16.84), and 12.16 (95% CI: 5.85-25.28), respectively, using a random effects model. Meta-regression showed that length of liver biopsy specimen potentially contributed to heterogeneity. There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. In chronic liver disease patients, RPR presented a good performance for prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. More future trials are required for prospective validation.

Evaluation of ballooned hepatocytes as a risk factor for future progression of fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has increased. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) shows progression of liver fibrosis in NAFLD. It remains unclear which patients with NAFLD will show progression of liver fibrosis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the risk factor associated with the progression of liver fibrosis among patients with NAFLD. This observational study enrolled 157 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Thirty-two patients were excluded because of lack of data. The accuracy of the formulae for estimating liver fibrosis, i.e., the FIB-4 index, APRI, and Forns index, was compared. Using serial changes of the best formula for liver fibrosis, we identified factors associated with the progression of liver fibrosis. Histological liver fibrosis was quantified using the Brunt stage. Sixty-three patients were diagnosed as having NASH. The FIB-4 index provided the best diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis [Brunt stage 0 versus 1-4, areas under the curve (AUC) 0.74; 0-1 versus 2-4, AUC 0.77; 0-2 versus 3-4, AUC 0.78; and 1-3 versus 4, AUC 0.87]. The association between body mass index, sex, observation period, and histological findings (liver fat content, bridging fibrosis, and hepatocyte ballooning) with the change in the FIB-4 index was evaluated among patients with NASH, using multivariate analysis. Among these factors, hepatocyte ballooning was associated with an increase in the FIB-4 index. The FIB-4 index was the best formula for estimating liver fibrosis in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, and the presence of ballooned hepatocytes was a risk factor for the progression of liver fibrosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis based on red cell distribution width (RDW) to platelet ratio with fibroscan in chronic hepatitis B

Red cell Distribution Width (RDW) and platelet ratio (RPR) can predict liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B with relatively high accuracy. RPR was superior to other non-invasive methods to predict liver fibrosis, such as AST and ALT ratio, AST and platelet ratio Index and FIB-4. The aim of this study was to assess diagnostic accuracy liver fibrosis by using RDW and platelets ratio in chronic hepatitis B patients based on compared with Fibroscan. This cross-sectional study was conducted at Adam Malik Hospital from January-June 2015. We examine 34 patients hepatitis B chronic, screen RDW, platelet, and fibroscan. Data were statistically analyzed. The result RPR with ROC procedure has an accuracy of 72.3% (95% CI: 84.1% - 97%). In this study, the RPR had a moderate ability to predict fibrosis degree (p = 0.029 with AUC> 70%). The cutoff value RPR was 0.0591, sensitivity and spesificity were 71.4% and 60%, Positive Prediction Value (PPV) was 55.6% and Negative Predictions Value (NPV) was 75%, positive likelihood ratio was 1.79 and negative likelihood ratio was 0.48. RPR have the ability to predict the degree of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients with moderate accuracy.

Comparison of acoustic structure quantification and shear wave elastography in the assessment of diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis

Objective To compare the value of acoustic structure quantification(ASQ) and shear wave elastography(SWE) in the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis. Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients with chronic hepatic diseases enrolled in our study were underwent ASQ, SWE and liver biopsy. Correlation between Total Mode, BR ratio, the elastic modulus and pathological stages of liver fibrosis were analyzed by Spearman′s rank test. ROC curves were set up by evaluating the degree of hepatic fibrosis through Total Mode, BR ratio, the elastic modulus. Results The significant positive correlation were observed between Total Mode, BR ratio, the elastic modulus and pathological stages of liver fibrosis(r=0.46, P=0.000; r=0.49, P=0.000; r=0.68, P=0.000, respectively). Total Mode, BR ratio, and the elastic modulus, of each pathological stages, had statistically significant differences(F=6.05, P=0.000; F=5.17, P=0.000; F=48.82, P=0.000, respectively). The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) set up by evaluating the pathological stages of fibrosis (S≥1, S≥2, S≥3 and S=4) through the elastic modulus were larger than that of Total Mode and BR ratio(all P 0.05). Conclusions SWE was more accurate than ASQ parameters (Total Mode, BR ratio) in grading hepatic fibrosis.ASQ parameters (Total Mode, BR ratio) were observed well-correlated with the pathological staging of hepatic fibrosis. Key words: Ultrasonography; Acoustic structure quantification; Elasticity imaging techniques; Liver cirrhosis

Serum Ferritin Levels Lack Diagnostic Accuracy for Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Series studies have associated increased serum levels of ferritin with liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. We aimed to determine the accuracy with which measurements of serum ferritin determine the presence and severity of liver fibrosis, and whether combining noninvasive scoring systems with serum ferritin analysis increases the accuracy of diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 1014 patients with liver biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Three cut points of serum ferritin level, adjusted for sex, were established based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis: 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-fold the upper limit of normal. Three multiple logistic regression models were created to determine the association of these cutoff values with liver fibrosis, adjusting for age, sex, race, diabetes, body mass index, and level of alanine aminotransferase. A greater proportion of patients with increased serum levels of ferritin had definitive nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and more-advanced fibrosis than patients without increased levels. In all models, serum level of ferritin was significantly associated with the presence and severity of liver fibrosis. However, for all 3 cutoff values, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were low (less than 0.60) for the presence of fibrosis or any stage of liver fibrosis; ferritin level identified patients with fibrosis with 16%-41% sensitivity and 70%-92% specificity. The accuracy with which noninvasive scoring systems identified patients with advanced fibrosis did not change with inclusion of serum ferritin values. Although serum levels of ferritin correlate with more-severe liver fibrosis, based on adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis, serum ferritin levels alone have a low level of diagnostic accuracy for the presence or severity of liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Two or More Synchronous Combination of Noninvasive Tests to Increase Accuracy of Liver Fibrosis Assessement in Chronic Hepatitis C; Results From a Cohort of 446 Patients

The prediction of fibrosis is an essential part of the assessment and management of patients with chronic liver disease. Non-invasive tests (NITs) have a number of advantages over the traditional standard of fibrosis assessment by liver biopsy, including safety, cost-effectiveness, and widespread accessibility. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of certain biomarkers and transient elastography (TE) alone or in combination to predict the stage of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Also, we examined whether the combination of certain biomarkers and TE could increase the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis assessment. A total of 446 patients who were previously diagnosed with CHC were included in the study. In the study group, 6 blood-based scores (APRI, Forns, Fib-4, Hepascore, FibroTest, and Fibrometer) were calculated, and TE was performed to validate the stage of fibrosis, compared with liver biopsy (LB) as the standard. Significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was predicted with an AUROC of 0.727, 0.680, 0.714, 0.778, 0.688, 0.797, and 0.751 for the APRI, Forns, Fib-4, FibroTest, Hepascore, and Fibrometer scores and TE (Fibroscan), respectively. Severe fibrosis (F ≥ 3) was predicted, with AUROCs ranging between 0.705 and 0.811 for Hepascore and Fibrometer, respectively. Of the biomarkers, Fibrometer had the highest AUROC value in predicting both significant and severe fibrosis. The combination of APRI or FIB-4 with Fibrometer increased the diagnostic accuracy for significant fibrosis (from 69.07 to 82.27 for APRI, P = 0.001 and from 57.74 to 81.33, P = 0.001 for Fib-4). Combining APRI or Fib-4 with TE also increased the diagnostic accuracy (from 69.07 to 80.70%, P = 0.001 for APRI and from 57.74 to 81.33%, P = 0.001 for Fib-4) for significant fibrosis. The association that included Fibrotest was also reliable for the improvement of diagnostic accuracy. These combinations were more accurate or the assessment of severe fibrosis. The synchronous association between a simple, inexpensive score and a complex but expensive score or TE increases the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive methods for the assessment of liver fibrosis stage.

Two or More Synchronous Combination of Noninvasive Tests to Increase Accuracy of Liver Fibrosis Assessement in Chronic Hepatitis C; Results From a Cohort of 446 Patients

: Background: The prediction of fibrosis is an essential part of the assessment and management of patients with chronic liver disease. Non-invasive tests (NITs) have a number of advantages over the traditional standard of fibrosis assessment by liver biopsy, including safety, cost-effectiveness, and widespread accessibility.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of certain biomarkers and transient elastography (TE) alone or in combination to predict the stage of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Also, we examined whether the combination of certain biomarkers and TE could increase the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis assessment.Patients and Methods: A total of 446 patients who were previously diagnosed with CHC were included in the study. In the study group, 6 blood-based scores (APRI, Forns, Fib-4, Hepascore, FibroTest, and Fibrometer) were calculated, and TE was performed to validate the stage of fibrosis, compared with liver biopsy (LB) as the standard.Results: Significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was predicted with an AUROC of 0.727, 0.680, 0.714, 0.778, 0.688, 0.797, and 0.751 for the APRI, Forns, Fib-4, FibroTest, Hepascore, and Fibrometer scores and TE (Fibroscan), respectively. Severe fibrosis (F ≥ 3) was predicted, with AUROCs ranging between 0.705 and 0.811 for Hepascore and Fibrometer, respectively. Of the biomarkers, Fibrometer had the highest AUROC value in predicting both significant and severe fibrosis. The combination of APRI or FIB-4 with Fibrometer increased the diagnostic accuracy for significant fibrosis (from 69.07 to 82.27 for APRI, P = 0.001 and from 57.74 to 81.33, P = 0.001 for Fib-4). Combining APRI or Fib-4 with TE also increased the diagnostic accuracy (from 69.07 to 80.70%, P = 0.001 for APRI and from 57.74 to 81.33%, P = 0.001 for Fib-4) for significant fibrosis. The association that included Fibrotest was also reliable for the improvement of diagnostic accuracy. These combinations were more accurate or the assessment of severe fibrosis.Conclusions: The synchronous association between a simple, inexpensive score and a complex but expensive score or TE increases the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive methods for the assessment of liver fibrosis stage. Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:This article is appropriate for researchers who are interested in articles related to the liver fibrosis and Chronic Hepatitis C. The article is also applied for the hematologists, virologists, gastroenterologists, internal specialists, and infectious disease specialists. Given the importance of managing chronic liver disease patients, diagnosis of liver fibrosis is very important. Please cite this paper as:Crisan D, Radu C, Lupsor M, Sparchez Z, Grigorescu MD, Grigorescu M. Two or More Synchronous Combination of Noninvasive Tests to Increase Accuracy of Liver Fibrosis Assessement in Chronic Hepatitis C; Results From a Cohort of 446 Patients. Hepat Mon. 2012;12(3):178-84. DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.853 Copyright © 2012 Kowsar M. P. Co. All rights reserved.

Diagnosis and Measurement of Liver Fibrosis by MRI in Bile Duct Ligated Rats

The noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis is a major clinical goal in liver diseases. Our aim was to identify MRI parameters to quantify liver fibrosis in vivo in an animal model of liver fibrosis with slight inflammation. We evaluated serum hyaluronate, liver hydroxyproline, area of liver fibrosis (image analysis), and 1.5-T MRI in 10 sham rats and 24 bile duct ligated rats with different stages of liver fibrosis. Liver signal intensity (SI)/muscle SI ratio and liver relaxation times (rT) were measured on T1 and T2 weighted sequences at different echo (TE) or recovery (RT) times of MRI. Among the 66 MRI parameters tested, the highest correlation with the area of fibrosis was observed for rT2 (r=0.78, P < 0.01). The area of liver fibrosis was independently predicted by five MRI variables (adjusted R (2)=0.78, with R (2)=0.64 for rT2 and rT1). Diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis was 100% using two variables: liver/muscle SI ratio on T2 at 30-ms TE and liver/muscle SI ratio on T1 at 50-ms RT. We conclude that in this animal model, fibrosis could be diagnosed with an accuracy of 100% using two MRI parameters. The quantification of liver fibrosis was very accurate either with only one MRI parameter (r=0.78 for rT2) or with five parameters (r=0.90) in this cholestatic model.

Validation and comparison of indexes for fibrosis and cirrhosis prediction in chronic hepatitis C patients: proposal for a pragmatic approach classification without liver biopsies

Noninvasive indexes have been developed to predict fibrosis staging. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these indexes in comparison with liver histology in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. A total of 235 consecutive patients with HCV infection from the Fibropaca multicentre independent study were included in this paper. FibroTest (FT), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and Forns score were assessed in the cohort and compared with liver histology performed on the same day. The main end point was the area under characteristic curves (AUCs) for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2-F4) and cirrhosis (F4) by the METAVIR classification. Mean age was 46 (+/-11) years, 55% were males, 42% (n = 99) had significant fibrosis (F2-F4) and 7% (n = 16) had cirrhosis (F4). For the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, respective AUCs of FT, APRI and Forns score were 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.86), 0.71 (0.67-0.79) and 0.76 (0.70-0.82); for cirrhosis prognosis, AUCs of FT and APRI were 0.82 (0.77-0.87) and 0.81 (0.76-0.86) (AUCs not significantly different). Using each index independently, all patients were classified by FT, 214 (91%) patients were classified by APRI and 129 (55%) by Forns score. There were significantly more cases of discordances between APRI and liver biopsy than between FT or Forns score and liver biopsy (P < 0.05). Performing all scores (FT, Forns and APRI) without liver biopsy allowed fibrosis to be well evaluated in 191 patients (81.3%), including patients with FT failure. Liver biopsy remained mandatory to evaluate fibrosis in 44 patients (18.7%). Our study shows that performing all the tests and liver biopsy improves the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients without patent comorbidities. The combination of all tests with liver biopsy allowed 225/235 (96%) patients to be correctly classified. The combination of all tests without liver biopsy allowed 191/235 (81.3%) patients to be correctly classified; liver biopsy remained mandatory in some patients (18.7%).