Diagnosis Of Small B-cell Lymphomas Research Articles

Relevance of Additional Immunohistochemical Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Small B-Cell Lymphomas: A Case-Control Study

Objective:Clinical and pathological differential diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas (SBCLs) is still controversial and may be difficult due to their overlapping morphology, phenotype, and differentiation to plasma cells. We aimed to examine the expression of the immune receptor translocation-associated protein 1 (IRTA1), myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen (MNDA), lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF1), and stathmin 1 (STMN1) markers in SBCL cases involving different sites that may have plasma cell differentiation.Materials and Methods:We studied 154 tissue samples with lymphoma involvement from 116 patients and evaluated the staining distribution of the markers. Expressions were evaluated in 21 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), 7 follicular lymphoma (FL), 14 nodal marginal zone lymphoma, 17 extranodal marginal zone lymphoma, 55 splenic marginal zone lymphoma, 22 marginal zone lymphoma-not otherwise specified, and 18 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia cases by immunohistochemistry.Results:The results confirmed that LEF1 was the most sensitive and specific marker for CLL/SLL and STMN1 was the most sensitive and specific marker for FL (p<0.001). MNDA and IRTA1 were useful markers to distinguish marginal zone lymphomas.Conclusion:Our results suggest that LEF1 for CLL/SLL and STMN1 for FL are reliable markers. LEF1, MNDA, STMN1, and IRTA1 are helpful with other routinely used immunohistochemical markers in a diagnostic algorithm considering their limitations.

Immunohistochemical Expression of BCL10 and Three Markers in Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma and Other Small B-Cell Lymphomas

Abstract Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) is a low-grade B-cell lymphoma representing about the third most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Western world. EMZL shows heterogeneous morphological features and expresses no specific immunohistochemical markers except B-cell markers. BCL10 and MALT mutations causing NF-kB pathway activation play an important role in oncogenesis of EMZL. Aberrant nuclear expression of BCL10 is reported in some EMZLs. Nuclear expression of BCL10 has not been well compared between EMZL and other small B-cell lymphomas. The aim of this study is to evaluate the expression of BCL10 and three markers in different small B-cell lymphomas. Tissue microarray blocks and selected tissue blocks, formalin fixed and paraffin embedded, were selected for immunohistochemical (IHC) studies. More than 100 cases of different small B-cell lymphomas include EMZL, small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), and hairy cell leukemia (HCL) in the bone marrow biopsy. Commercially available antibodies from DAKO for BCL-10, IRTA-1, LEF-1, and SOX-11 were used according to the protocol. Immunoreactivity in greater than 20% of the tumor cells was considered positive. BCL-10 nuclear expression occurred mostly in EMZL but also in other small B-cell lymphomas except LPL and HCL. Cytoplasmic expression of IRTA-1 was detected in all cases of EMZL and also in SLL, MCL, and FL cases; it was negative in LPL and HCL. Nuclear expression of LEF-1 was detected mostly in SLL cases, a few cases of MZL, and none of the cases of MCL, FL, LPL, and HCL. Nuclear staining of SOX11 was found in most MCL cases; it was negative in all cases of SLL, EMZL, FL, LPL, and HCL. The IHC markers of BCL-10, IRTA-1, LEF-1, and SOX11 increase our ability to make accurate diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas.

Cardiovascular adverse events complicating the administration of rituximab: report of two cases.

Rituximab is a murine/human chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen. It is widely used in combination with polychemotherapy regimens for the treatment of hematological disorders. There is no evidence of direct cardiotoxicity of the drug but a few cases of cardiovascular adverse events have been reported in the literature. We report on two patients affected by stage IV non-Hodgkin lymphoma with bone marrow infiltration and peripheral blood involvement who experienced cardiovascular accidents temporally related to rituximab infusion. In both cases the monoclonal antibody was administered in association with a polychemotherapy regimen but administration was postponed several days later in order to avoid severe cytokine release syndrome because of the high tumor burden. The first case concerns an episode of atrial fibrillation in a patient with a diagnosis of small B-cell lymphoma. The episode happened immediately after rituximab infusion. In the second case there was an episode of chest pain associated with fever and chills during rituximab infusion in a patient with a diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. In both cases we noticed an unusual correlation between symptom recurrence and the speed of rituximab infusion. Both patients presented several cardiovascular risk factors but preliminary cardiac function assessment excluded signs of heart dysfunction. The pathogenesis of cardiovascular events during rituximab infusion remains unclear. A key role might be played by cytokine release from B cells as a consequence of rituximab activity. Moreover, pre-existing silent cardiac damage could be co-responsible for the clinical manifestations we reported. We consider our clinical experience relevant because it raises an issue of good clinical practice: despite rituximab's good tolerability profile, patients with cardiovascular risk factors should undergo accurate cardiac assessment so that silent heart disease can be detected. If the suspicion of cardiac damage is high, more extensive cardiac assessment is recommended.

Cardiovascular Adverse Events Complicating the Administration of Rituximab: Report of Two Cases

Rituximab is a murine/human chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen. It is widely used in combination with polychemotherapy regimens for the treatment of hematological disorders. There is no evidence of direct cardiotoxicity of the drug but a few cases of cardiovascular adverse events have been reported in the literature. We report on two patients affected by stage IV non-Hodgkin lymphoma with bone marrow infiltration and peripheral blood involvement who experienced cardiovascular accidents temporally related to rituximab infusion. In both cases the monoclonal antibody was administered in association with a polychemotherapy regimen but administration was postponed several days later in order to avoid severe cytokine release syndrome because of the high tumor burden. The first case concerns an episode of atrial fibrillation in a patient with a diagnosis of small B-cell lymphoma. The episode happened immediately after rituximab infusion. In the second case there was an episode of chest pain associated with fever and chills during rituximab infusion in a patient with a diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. In both cases we noticed an unusual correlation between symptom recurrence and the speed of rituximab infusion. Both patients presented several cardiovascular risk factors but preliminary cardiac function assessment excluded signs of heart dysfunction. The pathogenesis of cardiovascular events during rituximab infusion remains unclear. A key role might be played by cytokine release from B cells as a consequence of rituximab activity. Moreover, pre-existing silent cardiac damage could be co-responsible for the clinical manifestations we reported. We consider our clinical experience relevant because it raises an issue of good clinical practice: despite rituximab's good tolerability profile, patients with cardiovascular risk factors should undergo accurate cardiac assessment so that silent heart disease can be detected. If the suspicion of cardiac damage is high, more extensive cardiac assessment is recommended.

Nuclear overexpression of lymphoid-enhancer-binding factor 1 identifies chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in small B-cell lymphomas

Lymphoid-enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1), coupling with β-catenin, functions as a key nuclear mediator of WNT/β-catenin signaling, which regulates cell proliferation and survival. LEF1 has an important role in lymphopoiesis, and is normally expressed in T and pro-B cells but not mature B cells. However, gene expression profiling demonstrates overexpression of LEF1 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and knockdown of LEF1 decreases the survival of the leukemic cells. So far, the data on LEF1 expression in B-cell lymphomas are limited. This study represents the first attempt to assess LEF1 by immunohistochemistry in a large series (290 cases) of B-cell lymphomas. Strong nuclear staining of LEF1 was observed in virtually all neoplastic cells in 92 of 92 (100%) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphomas including two CD5− cases, with strongest staining in cells with Richter's transformation. LEF1 also highlighted the morphologically inconspicuous small lymphocytic lymphoma component in three composite lymphomas. All 53 mantle cell lymphomas, 31 low-grade follicular lymphomas and 31 marginal zone lymphomas, including 3 CD5+ cases, were negative. In 12 grade 3 follicular lymphomas, LEF1 was positive in a small subset (5–15%) of cells. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, however, demonstrated significant variability in LEF1 expression with overall positivity in 27 of 71 (38%) cases. Our results demonstrate that nuclear overexpression of LEF1 is highly associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and may serve as a convenient marker for differential diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas. The expression of β-catenin, the coactivator of LEF1 in WNT signaling, was examined in 50 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphomas, of which 44 (88%) showed negative nuclear staining. The findings of universal nuclear overexpression of LEF1 but lack of nuclear β-catenin in the majority of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma suggest that the pro-survival function of LEF1 in this disease may be independent of WNT/β-catenin signaling.

Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma and Other Non–Marginal Zone Lymphomas With Plasmacytic Differentiation

Small B-cell lymphomas with plasmacytic differentiation frequently present diagnostic challenges. Session 3 of the 2009 Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology Workshop focused on lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). The submitted cases illustrated classic examples of bone marrow-based and nodal LPL and cases with atypical features, including unusual phenotypes or involvement of extranodal sites. Several cases showed varying degrees of overlap with marginal zone lymphoma, and, as acknowledged in the 2008 World Health Organization classification, a definitive distinction between these 2 possibilities cannot always be established. Session 6 of the workshop focused on other non-marginal zone lymphomas that may display plasmacytic differentiation. This session highlights the wide variety of neoplasms that enter into the differential diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas with plasmacytic differentiation and demonstrates the use of clinical features and ancillary studies in establishing an appropriate diagnosis by 2008 World Health Organization criteria.

Cyclin D1 expression in typical chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Demonstration of cyclin D1 expression by immunohistochemistry in a CD5-positive small B-cell proliferation is extremely helpful in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma in tissue samples, including bone marrow trephine biopsies (BMTB) and in differentiating them from chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Following the identification of cyclin D1 expression in one case of CLL on BMTB, 64 additional cases, which included 25 lymph nodes, one tonsillar lesion, one skin lesion and 37 BMTBs were systematically reviewed for presence of cyclin D1 overexpression. Overall, in seven of 65 samples (approximately 10%) of CLL, a minority of the leukaemic cells in the proliferation centres expressed cyclin D1. Cytogenetic analysis had been performed in three of seven cases and there was no evidence of translocation involving CCND1 locus. Our findings suggest that a small subset of CLL overexpresses cyclin D1 in amounts that can be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. Our observation has impact on the diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas in BMTB and other tissue samples.

Evaluation of a low density DNA microarray for small B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma differential diagnosis

Lymphomas are classified according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification which defines subtypes on the basis of clinical, morphological, immunophenotypic, molecular and cytogenetic criteria. Differential diagnosis of the subtypes is sometimes difficult, especially for small B-cell lymphoma (SBCL). Standardisation of molecular genetic assays using multiple gene expression analysis by microarrays could be a useful complement to the current diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to develop a low density DNA microarray for the analysis of 107 genes associated with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and to evaluate its performance in the diagnosis of SBCL. A predictive tool based on Fisher discriminant analysis using a training set of 40 patients including four different subtypes (follicular lymphoma n = 15, mantle cell lymphoma n = 7, B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia n = 6 and splenic marginal zone lymphoma n = 12) was designed. A short additional preliminary analysis to gauge the accuracy of this signature was then performed on an external set of nine patients. Using this model, eight of nine of those samples were classified successfully. This pilot study demonstrates that such a microarray tool may be a promising diagnostic approach for small B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Comparison of Multiparameter Flow Cytometry with Cluster Analysis and Immunohistochemistry for the Detection of CD10 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas

CD10 is a critical antigen for the distinction of follicle-center lymphoma from other B-cell lymphomas composed of small cells in fine-needle aspiration specimens, tissue core biopsies, and bone marrow. In addition, CD10 is expressed in a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs), where it may be an adverse prognostic indicator. We have previously demonstrated that CD10 expression detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (FC) with cluster analysis is highly sensitive and specific for follicle-center lymphoma in the differential diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas. In this study, we assessed the utility of paraffin section immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD10 compared with FC in a cohort of 50 DLBCLs. IHC for CD10 was technically successful in 47 of the 50 (94%) DLBCLs; 3 failed based on lack of internal CD10 reactivity. CD10 was expressed by FC in 20 of 47 DLBCLs (43%); CD10 was positive by IHC in 15 of these (75%). All 27 cases that were CD10(−) by FC were negative by IHC. The level of CD10 expression by FC in the 5 FC(+)/IHC(−) cases ranged from relatively dim to bright. Our results indicate 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity of CD10 expression by IHC compared with multiparameter FC with cluster analysis and a 6% technical failure rate.

Assessment of CD10 in the Diagnosis of Small B-Cell Lymphomas

We evaluated the usefulness of multiparameter flow cytometry with cluster analysis in the diagnosis of a series of 100 well-characterized small B-cell lymphomas (SBCLs). The histologic diagnoses in the 100 cases were follicular lymphoma (FL) in 58, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) in 17, small lymphocytic lymphoma in 15, and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in 10. Of the 58 FLs, 57 were CD10 positive (98% sensitivity). The 1 negative case was unusual in that it occurred in the small intestine. However; architectural, cytologic, and immunohistochemicalfeatures were diagnostic of FL. Of 42 other SBCLs, 2 were CD10+ (95% specificity); 1 was a CD5+/cyclin D1 + MCL, and the other was an extranodal MZL. We found that assessment of CD10 expression using multiparameter flow cytometry with cluster analysis is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of FL, validating its usefulness in situations in which adequate tissue is not available for definitive histologic diagnosis.

SHP-1 expression by malignant small B-cell lymphomas reflects the maturation stage of their normal B-cell counterparts.

SHP-1 is a protein phosphotyrosine phosphatase that plays an important role in modulating intracellular signaling, which regulates cell activation, proliferation, differentiation, and migration. It is a negative regulator of signal transduction induced by a number of cell receptors. Our immunohistochemical examination of paraffin-embedded reactive lymph nodes and lymphoid tissues revealed that B lymphocytes in follicle germinal centers do not express SHP-1. A weak staining of the B cells in the germinal center light zones was detected when an ultrasensitive amplification system was used. In contrast, normal B cells in mantle and marginal zones as well as interfollicular B lymphocytes and plasma cells displayed strong immunoreactivity. This pattern of SHP-1 expression was repeated in small B-cell lymphomas. All cases of mantle cell lymphoma (12 of 12), marginal zone lymphoma (10 of 10), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (13 of 13) expressed SHP-1 protein. However, only 1 of 30 cases of grade 1 follicle center cell lymphoma expressed SHP-1. Our observations highlight the biologic functions of SHP-1 and demonstrate that the SHP-1 expression pattern by small B-cell lymphomas reflects the maturation stage of their normal cell counterparts. These results indicate that determination of SHP-1 expression may help in the differential diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas.

Monoclonal antibodies recognizing CD5, CD10 and CD23 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: production and assessment of their value in the diagnosis of small B-cell lymphoma.

Assessment of the expression of antigens CD5, CD10 and CD23 can be of value in the differential diagnosis of small B-cell lymphoma. Correct subclassification is important since optimal treatment regimes differ between the subtypes. The aim of this study was to generate monoclonal antibodies recognizing these antigens in paraffin-embedded tissue and to assess their efficacy using a panel of cases of small B-cell lymphoma of various subtypes. For each antibody synthetic recombinant protein and conventional murine hybridoma technology was employed. Monoclonal antibodies effective in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue were successfully generated, designated NCL-CD5-4C7, NCL-CD10-270 and NCL-CD23-1B12, respectively. A series of 58 cases of small B-cell lymphoma including examples of each subtype (lymphocytic, follicle centre cell, mantle cell, marginal zone and lymphoplasmacytoid) was assembled and immunostaining for the respective antigens carried out using the monoclonal antibodies produced. Our results indicate that the antibodies are specific for their respective antigens and give the predicted phenotypic profile in the small B-cell lymphoma subtypes. These novel monoclonal antibodies may be of value in routine diagnostic practice.