Diagnosis Of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Research Articles

Disease-Modifying Treatments and Time to Loss of Ambulatory Function in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Except for ocrelizumab, treatment options in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) are lacking. To investigate the effectiveness of DMTs on the risk of becoming wheelchair dependent in a real-world population of patients with PPMS. This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective, comparative effectiveness research study. Data were extracted on November 28, 2018, from the Italian multiple sclerosis register and analyzed from June to December 2021. Mean study follow-up was 11 years. Included in the study cohort were patients with a diagnosis of PPMS and at least 3 years of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluations and 3 years of follow-up. The risk of reaching an EDSS score of 7.0 was assessed through multivariable Cox regression models. Patients who received DMT before the outcome were considered treated. DMT was assessed as a time-dependent variable and by class of DMT (moderately and highly effective). From a total of 3298 patients with PPMS, 2633 were excluded because they did not meet the entry criteria for the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in adults with PPMS (ORATORIO) trial. Among the remaining 665 patients (mean [SD] age, 43.0 [10.7] years; 366 female patients [55.0%]), 409 were further selected for propensity score matching (288 treated and 121 untreated patients). In the matched cohort, during the study follow-up, 37% of patients (152 of 409) reached an EDSS score of 7.0 after a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.6 (5.6) years. A higher EDSS score at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55; P < .001), superimposed relapses (aHR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.24-4.54; P = .009), and DMT exposure (aHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.04-2.94; P = .03) were associated with a higher risk of an EDSS score of 7.0, whereas the interaction term between DMT and superimposed relapses was associated with a reduced risk of EDSS score of 7.0 (aHR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.71; P = .004). Similar findings were obtained when treatment according to DMT class was considered and when DMT was included as a time-dependent covariate. These results were confirmed in the subgroup of patients with available magnetic resonance imaging data. Results of this comparative effectiveness research study suggest that inflammation also occurs in patients with PPMS, may contribute to long-term disability, and may be associated with a reduced risk of becoming wheelchair dependent by current licensed DMTs.

Evaluation of the times of disability progression and related factors in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis from Argentina

Background PPMS (primary progressive multiple sclerosis) patients represent less than 10% of MS patients in Argentina, men and women were similarly affected and most of them had a severe functional impairment. More rapid progression has been reported in males, but this is not the case in all datasets. The main objective of our study was to determine the time to EDSS (Expanded disability Status Scale) 4, 6 and 7 in PPMS patients. We also compared the times to reach these EDSS in men and women and aimed to identify factors associated with the disability progression.Method This cohort of patients with diagnosis of PPMS (n = 253) was selected from follow-up recorded in the RelevarEM registry database.Result The median times to EDSS 4, 6 and 7 were 24 (IQR 12–48), 72 (IQR 36–96) and 96 (IQR 60–120) months, respectively. Comparison of the survival curves to EDSS 4, 6 and 7 according to gender did not show significant differences (p = 0.33, p = 0.55 and p = 0.59). There is no evidence of an association between the clinical adjustment variables (sex, age >40 years at diagnosis, EDSS > 3 at onset and multifocal MS symptoms at disease onset) and the time of arrival at the EDSS 4, 6 and 7.Conclusion Severe disability was observed six years after the onset of symptoms. No association was found between the studied factors and the time to arrival to severe disability.

Medical history risk factors in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A case-control study

Background: The association between medical history and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) development has not been well documented in the pertinent literature. The possible association between 23 medical diseases and PPMS occurrence was assessed in the present study. Methods: In order to figure out the possible association between several medical histories and PPMS occurrence, the present population-based case-control study examined 143 PPMS cases in Tehran, Iran, from 2019 to 2020. Diagnosis of PPMS was confirmed by neurologists based on the 2017 McDonald criteria. Sex-matched healthy controls (n = 143) were selected using the random-digit dialing (RDD) technique. Face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted for gathering the data. The conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate adjusted and unadjusted odds ratio (OR) at a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A significant association was found between PPMS development and diseases like depression (OR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.49-6.53), migraine (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05-0.67), infectious mononucleosis (OR = 13.16, 95% CI: 2.74-63.17), hypothyroidism (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.23-8.30), and kidney failure (OR = 3.76, 95% CI: 1.41-9.99). Conclusion: Lifetime history of depression, infectious mononucleosis, hypothyroidism, and kidney failure might increase the risk of PPMS development, while individuals with positive history of migraine disease are at lower risk for developing PPMS.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Relation to MRZ Reaction Status in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

The MRZ reaction (MRZR) comprises the three antibody indices (AIs) against measles, rubella, and varicella zoster virus, reflecting an intrathecal polyspecific B cell response highly specific for multiple sclerosis (MS). Thus, MRZR can be used to confirm a diagnosis of primary progressive MS (PPMS) but its pathophysiological and wider clinical relevance is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether PPMS patients with a positive MRZR (MRZR+) differ from those with a negative MRZR (MRZR-) according to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of B cell activity, neuroaxonal damage or glial activity, and clinical features. (1) Methods: In a multicenter PPMS cohort (n = 81) with known MRZR status, we measured B cell-activating factor (BAFF), chemokine CXC ligand 13 (CXCL-13), soluble B cell maturation antigen (sBCMA), soluble transmembrane activator and CAML interactor (sTACI), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) in the CSF with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) were detected in serum and CSF using single molecule array (SIMOA) technology. (2) Results: MRZR+ patients (45.7% of all PPMS patients) revealed higher levels of NfL in CSF compared to MRZR- patients (54.3%). There were positive correlations between each of sBCMA, sTACI, and intrathecal immunoglobin G (IgG) synthesis. Additionally, NfL concentrations in serum positively correlated with those in CSF and those of GFAP in serum. However, MRZR+ and MRZR- patients did not differ concerning clinical features (e.g., age, disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at diagnosis and follow-up); CSF routine parameters; CSF concentrations of BAFF, CXCL-13, sBCMA, sTACI, CHI3L1, and GFAP; or serum concentrations of GFAP and NfL. (3) Conclusions: In PPMS patients, MRZR positivity might indicate a more pronounced axonal damage. Higher levels of the soluble B cell receptors BCMA and transmembrane activator and CAML interactor (TACI) in CSF are associated with a stronger intrathecal IgG synthesis in PPMS.

Workplace difficulties, health-related quality of life, and perception of stigma from the perspective of patients with Multiple Sclerosis

IntroductionIn Multiple Sclerosis (MS), withdrawal from employment is a critical problem. This study explores relationships between disease characteristics, work difficulties, health-related quality of life, depression, and stigma and how these factors affect employment status. MethodsA multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted in adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS). Patient-reported questionnaires included: 23-item Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire, 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale, Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness, and Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen. ResultsA total of 199 individuals (mean age = 43.9 ± 10.5 years, 60.8% female, 86.4% with RRMS) participated in the study. Mean time from diagnosis was 9.6 ± 7.2 years and median Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 2.0 (interquartile range: 1.0–3.5). Employment rate was 47.2% (n = 94). Mean physical and psychological MSIS-29 impact sub-scores were 40.38 ± 17.1 and 20.24 ± 7.8, respectively. Forty patients (19.9%) had at least one SSCI-8 item with a score of 4 or 5, suggesting the presence of stigma often or always. Eighty-one patients (40.7%) were depressed and 25 (12.6%) had moderate-to-severe depression. Work difficulties were higher in those with worse functional status, a diagnosis of PPMS, and lower educational levels. Employed participants had lower perceptions of stigma and depressive symptoms than those not employed. Higher perceptions of stigma were also strongly linked to higher physical and psychological impact on health-related quality of life and greater work difficulties. Depressive symptoms were also strongly related to work-related problems. ConclusionsWork difficulties, stigma and poor quality of life are common in MS patients, even in a population with low physical disability. Evaluation of these dimensions in clinical practice would allow the development of targeted rehabilitation and specific work plans for MS employers.

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis in a 10-year-old Nigerian boy

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is generally believed to be extremely rare in black African children, and the primary progressive form is the rarest type. We describe a case of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) in a 10-year-old Nigerian boy and highlight the challenges of management in a resource-limited setting. He presented with 2 years history of inability to neither walk nor use the left upper limb, and a year history of progressive loss of vision. The symptoms were insidious in onset and associated with nasal and slurred speech, hesitancy, incomplete voiding, and occasional jerky movement of the lower limbs. Examination revealed a cheerful child with good memory and intelligence. There were reduced muscle power and lead-pipe rigidity in all the limbs except the right upper limb which was normal. Fundoscopy revealed bilateral optic atrophy. The diagnosis of PPMS was made by the typical clinical presentation, and brain and spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We had no facilities for cerebrospinal uid monoclonal IgG. This case highlights the need for pediatricians in the tropics to have a high index of suspicion and for healthcare systems to be equipped with facilities to accurately diagnose pediatric MS.

Predicting clinical progression in multiple sclerosis after 6 and 12 years

Background and purposeTo predict disability and cognition in multiple sclerosis (MS) after 6 and 12 years, using early clinical and imaging measures.MethodsA total of 115 patients with MS were selected and followed up after 2 and 6 years, with 79 patients also being followed up after 12 years. Disability was measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS); cognition was measured only at follow‐up using neuropsychological testing. Predictors of interest included EDSS score, baseline brain and lesion volumes and their changes over 2 years, baseline age, clinical phenotype, sex and educational level.ResultsHigher 6‐year EDSS score was predicted by early EDSS score and whole‐brain volume changes and baseline diagnosis of primary progressive MS (adjusted R 2 = 0.56). Predictors for 12‐year EDSS score included larger EDSS score changes and higher T1‐hypointense lesion volumes (adjusted R 2 = 0.38). Year 6 cognition was predicted by primary progressive MS phenotype, lower educational level, male sex and early whole‐brain atrophy (adjusted R 2 = 0.26); year 12 predictors included male sex, lower educational level and higher baseline T1‐hypointense lesion volumes (adjusted R 2 = 0.14).ConclusionsPatients with early signs of neurodegeneration and a progressive disease onset were more prone to develop both disability progression and cognitive dysfunction. Male sex and lower educational level only affected cognitive dysfunction, which remains difficult to predict and probably needs more advanced imaging measures.

Relapse prevalence, symptoms, and health care engagement: patient insights from the Multiple Sclerosis in America 2017 survey

BackgroundUnderestimation of relapse in multiple sclerosis (MS) is detrimental to the patient as well as to their relationship with their MS healthcare professional (HCP). ObjectiveTo obtain direct insight into relapse prevalence, symptoms, and HCP engagement from patients with MS who responded to the Multiple Sclerosis in America (MSIA) 2017 survey. MethodsInformation on patient demographics, health insurance coverage, symptoms, disability, relapses, and related HCP interactions were captured. Descriptive analyses were conducted and relapses were annualized. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate frequency of patient engagement, i.e. speaking with or seeing their HCP during relapse with annualized relapse frequency and topics discussed. ResultsOf the 5,311 patient-respondents, the mean age was 51.2 years (84.3% female, 89.3% Caucasian); 40.1% were on disability, and 96.8% had health insurance coverage. A total of 72.2% of patients were diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS); 74.8% of patients not reporting a diagnosis of primary progressive MS (PPMS) (n = 4819) were using disease-modifying therapy. In the 2 years preceding the survey, 73.1% experienced a relapse for a median number of 2 relapses; this corresponded to an annualized relapse distribution among all patients of 44.1% with < 1 relapse, 35.5% with 1–2 relapses, and 20.2% with > 2 relapses. In patients reporting relapses, 62.5% cited an average relapse duration of < 1 month, 10.9% cited 1–2 months, and 13.6% cited > 2 months (12.9% were unsure/didn't recall). Leading symptoms experienced with MS relapse were fatigue (77.4%), numbness/tingling (70.0%), and walking or balance issues (68.8%). With respect to HCP engagement during relapse, 46.9% of patients reported doing so always/often, vs. sometimes (27.3%), rarely (18.5%), and never (7.3%). The most common reasons cited for not engaging an HCP were that the relapse was not severe enough (57.9%), the HCP was unhelpful or didn't specifically tell the patient to contact them (30.9%), the treatment didn't work well or wasn't tolerated (25.6%), or the preference to manage alone (24.4%). A higher percentage of patients with 1 relapse coincided with the highest frequency of HCP engagement during relapse, and the highest percentage of patients with ≥ 5 relapses coincided with the lowest frequency of HCP engagement during relapse. Key relapse-related and MS-related topics were discussed more by patients who always/often engage their HCP during relapse. HCP follow-up after relapse was variable, with 35.0% of patients reporting follow-up within 1 month of first contact, 50.3% reporting follow-up at the next office visit, and 14.7% reporting no follow-up. ConclusionMS relapse remains particularly challenging for certain patients; some experience > 2 relapses in 1 year, relapse durations > 1 month, and relapse symptoms that interfere with daily functioning (e.g. walking/balance by 68.8%). Approximately 25% of patients reported rarely or never engaging their HCP during relapse. Common reasons for not engaging, like HCP helpfulness and treatment effectiveness/tolerance, warrant further exploration. Results indicating the benefits of timely touchpoints on both the part of the patient and HCP during relapse include the relationship between higher frequency of engagement with lower relapse frequency and more discussion of both relapse-related and MS-related discussion topics. Survey limitations apply.

Metabolomic Profiles for Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Stratification and Disease Course Monitoring.

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) shows a highly variable disease progression with poor prognosis and a characteristic accumulation of disabilities in patients. These hallmarks of PPMS make it difficult to diagnose and currently impossible to efficiently treat. This study aimed to identify plasma metabolite profiles that allow diagnosis of PPMS and its differentiation from the relapsing-remitting subtype (RRMS), primary neurodegenerative disease (Parkinson’s disease, PD), and healthy controls (HCs) and that significantly change during the disease course and could serve as surrogate markers of multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated neurodegeneration over time. We applied untargeted high-resolution metabolomics to plasma samples to identify PPMS-specific signatures, validated our findings in independent sex- and age-matched PPMS and HC cohorts and built discriminatory models by partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). This signature was compared to sex- and age-matched RRMS patients, to patients with PD and HC. Finally, we investigated these metabolites in a longitudinal cohort of PPMS patients over a 24-month period. PLS-DA yielded predictive models for classification along with a set of 20 PPMS-specific informative metabolite markers. These metabolites suggest disease-specific alterations in glycerophospholipid and linoleic acid pathways. Notably, the glycerophospholipid LysoPC(20:0) significantly decreased during the observation period. These findings show potential for diagnosis and disease course monitoring, and might serve as biomarkers to assess treatment efficacy in future clinical trials for neuroprotective MS therapies.

Employment and absenteeism in working-age persons with multiple sclerosis

Aims: To better understand the impact of the clinical course of multiple sclerosis (MS) and disability on employment, absenteeism, and related factors.Materials and methods: This study included respondents to the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry spring 2015 update survey who were US or Canadian residents, aged 18–65 years and reported having relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), or primary progressive MS (PPMS). The RRMS and SPMS participants were combined to form the relapsing-onset MS (RMS) group and compared with the PPMS group regarding employment status, absenteeism, and disability. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between employment-related outcomes and factors that may affect these relationships.Results: Of the 8004 survey respondents, 5887 (73.6%) were 18–65 years of age. The PPMS group (n = 344) had a higher proportion of males and older mean age at the time of the survey and at time of diagnosis than the RMS group (n = 4829). Female sex, age, age at diagnosis, cognitive and hand function impairment, fatigue, higher disability levels, ≥3 comorbidities, and a diagnosis of PPMS were associated with not working. After adjustment for disability, the employed PPMS sub-group reported similar levels of absenteeism to the employed RMS sub-group.Limitations: Limitations of the study include self-report of information and the possibility that participants may not fully represent the working-age MS population.Conclusions: In MS, employment status and absenteeism are negatively affected by disability, cognitive impairment, and fatigue. These findings underscore the need for therapies that prevent disability progression and other symptoms that negatively affect productivity in persons with MS to enable them to persist in the workforce.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Multiple Sclerosis Overlap: A Case Report

The concurrence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple sclerosis (MS) is extremely rare. We reported the case of a 33-year-old woman with a past history of paresthesias at the right hand, who developed progressive quadriparesis with muscular atrophy of limbs and, finally, bulbar signs and dyspnea. Clinical and neurophysiologic investigations revealed upper and lower motor neuron signs in the bulbar region and extremities, suggesting the diagnosis of ALS. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis demonstrated 3 periventricular and juxtacortical lesions, hyperintense in T2 and FLAIR sequences, and 3 liquoral immunoglobulin G (IgG) oligoclonal bands, consistent with diagnosis of primary progressive MS (PPMS). This unusual overlap of ALS and MS leads to the discussion of a hypothetical common pathological process of immunological dysfunction in these two disorders, although the role of immune response in ALS remains ambivalent and unclear.

The role of MRI of the brain and spinal cord, and CSF examination for the diagnosis of primary progressive multiple sclerosis

The clinical applicability of the revised McDonald diagnostic criteria of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) was assessed in 17 patients with a longstanding PPMS diagnosis (mean 15 years). All patients were re-evaluated with clinical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and the spinal cord, extensive laboratory tests, and 12 patients underwent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination. No diagnosis more likely than PPMS was disclosed. All patients had brain and spinal cord lesions on MRI. In 15 patients the brain lesions and in 14 the spinal cord lesions fulfilled the revised McDonald criteria for positive scans. No contrast-enhancing lesion was observed despite administration of triple doses of gadolinium. In total, 12 patients fulfilled the revised McDonald MRI criteria for PPMS. Of the remaining five patients who incompletely fulfilled the revised MRI criteria, all had CSF findings supporting the diagnosis PPMS. Thus, CSF analysis was required in addition to MRI in about one-third of the patients to establish the diagnosis of PPMS.

Comparison of Methods for the Detection of Oligoclonal IgG Bands in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum: Results of the Dutch Quality Control Survey

Detection of oligoclonal IgG bands (OCBs) in parallel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples is an important tool to support the diagnosis of neuroinflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) (1). Because ∼90–95% of the patients diagnosed with MS present with OCBs in the CSF (2), whereas other CSF indices may be normal, this type of analysis has long been recommended for the diagnosis of MS, especially when the clinical presentation does not clearly suggest this diagnosis (1)(3). CSF-restricted OCBs are also essential for the diagnosis of primary progressive MS (1). Furthermore, in several neuroimmunologic disorders, including neuroborreliosis, neurosyphilis, and viral infections of the brain, the identification of OCBs in CSF may be helpful in the diagnostic process (2)(4)(5). Twice a year, pairs of CSF and serum samples are distributed by our laboratories to the participants of the Dutch CSF Quality Control survey for analysis of OCBs. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the performance of the 56 participating laboratories for OCB analysis with regard to both the methods used for protein separation and detection of OCBs and to derive a general recommendation on laboratory management for this type of analysis. To collect a sufficient volume of CSF, samples stored at −80 °C and selected for the absence of OCBs were pooled. Sera taken from healthy controls were collected and pooled as well. Sera containing either a known OCB pattern or monoclonal IgG were also collected with informed consent from patients. We added minimal amounts of these clinical serum samples to the CSF pool to create artificial patient CSF samples. In each survey, an OCB-enriched CSF sample and a serum sample were sent out as a pair of clinical CSF and serum samples. In this way we were able to …

Diagnostic criteria for primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A position paper

The unique clinical characteristics of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) pose particular diagnostic difficulties, both in excluding other causes of progressive syndromes and in confirming the diagnosis of MS, which is not adequately addressed by current diagnostic criteria. This article presents new diagnostic criteria developed by a group of investigators on the basis of a review of their considerable experience with PPMS. (We conclude that at least 1 year of clinical progression must be documented before a diagnosis of PPMS is made.) Three levels of diagnostic certainty have been defined-definite, probable, and possible--based on clinical findings, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid, abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spinal cord, and evoked potentials. In definite PPMS, evidence of intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulin G together with one of the following three MRI criteria is required: (1) nine brain lesions, (2) two spinal cord lesions, or (3) four to eight brain lesions and one spinal cord lesion. Preliminary testing of these criteria was carried out on a cohort of 156 patients participating in a European natural history study of PPMS: 64% fulfilled the criteria for definite PPMS, 35% for probable PPMS, and only 1% for possible PPMS. These criteria now require prospective validation in a cohort of newly diagnosed patients and by postmortem examination.

Diagnostic criteria for primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A position paper

The unique clinical characteristics of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) pose particular diagnostic difficulties, both in excluding other causes of progressive syndromes and in confirming the diagnosis of MS, which is not adequately addressed by current diagnostic criteria. This article presents new diagnostic criteria developed by a group of investigators on the basis of a review of their considerable experience with PPMS. (We conclude that at least 1 year of clinical progression must be documented before a diagnosis of PPMS is made.) Three levels of diagnostic certainty have been defined—definite, probable, and possible—based on clinical findings, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid, abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spinal cord, and evoked potentials. In definite PPMS, evidence of intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulin G together with one of the following three MRI criteria is required: (1) nine brain lesions, (2) two spinal cord lesions, or (3) four to eight brain lesions and one spinal cord lesion. Preliminary testing of these criteria was carried out on a cohort of 156 patients participating in a European natural history study of PPMS: 64% fulfilled the criteria for definite PPMS, 35% for probable PPMS, and only 1% for possible PPMS. These criteria now require prospective validation in a cohort of newly diagnosed patients and by postmortem examination. Ann Neurol 2000;47:831–835