Diagnosis Of Primary Headaches Research Articles

Rationale for issuing neuroimaging requests for patients with primary headaches in China.

To investigate the prevalence of neuroimaging in patients with primary headaches and the clinician-based rationale for requesting neuroimaging in China. This study included patients with primary headaches admitted to hospitals and clinicians in China. We identified whether neuroimaging was requested and the types of neuroimaging conducted. This was a cross-sectional study, and convenience sampling was used to recruit patients with primary headaches. Clinicians were interviewed using a combination of personal in-depth and topic-selection group interviews to explore why doctors requested neuroimaging. We searched for the diagnosis of primary headache in the outpatient and inpatient systems according to the International Classification of Diseases-10 code of patients admitted to six hospitals in three provincial capitals by 2022.We selected three public and three private hospitals with neurology specialties that treated a corresponding number of patients. Among the 2263 patients recruited for this study, 1942 (89.75%) underwent neuroimaging. Of the patients, 1157 (51.13%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 246 (10.87%) underwent both head computed tomography (CT) and MRI, and 628 (27.75%) underwent CT. Fifteen of the 16 interviewed clinicians did not issue a neuroimaging request for patients with primary headaches. Furthermore, we found that doctors issued a neuroimaging request for patients with primary headaches mostly, to exclude the risk of misdiagnosis, reduce uncertainty, avoid medical disputes, meet patients' medical needs, and complete hospital assessment indicators. For primary headaches, the probability of clinicians requesting neuroimaging was higher in China than in other countries. There is considerable room for improvement in determining appropriate strategies to reduce the use of low-value care for doctors and patients.

New Daily Persistent Headache.

This article describes the clinical features, etiology, differential diagnosis, management, and prognosis of new daily persistent headache. New daily persistent headache has attracted renewed attention as it may arise in the setting of a COVID-19 infection. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension, particularly from CSF-venous fistulas, remains an important secondary headache disorder to consider before diagnosing new daily persistent headache. Symptomatic treatment for new daily persistent headache may include acute and preventive therapies used for migraine and tension-type headache, such as triptans, oral preventive agents, onabotulinumtoxinA, and agents that target calcitonin gene-related peptide. New daily persistent headache is a daily headache syndrome that starts acutely and can only be diagnosed after 3 months have elapsed and other secondary and primary headache diagnoses have been excluded. The clinical manifestations largely resemble either chronic migraine or chronic tension-type headache. The underlying cause is unknown, but it is plausible that multiple etiologies exist and that it is not a single disease entity. The prognosis is variable but often poor, and the treatment approach is largely extrapolated from the management of chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache.

Transcranial direct current stimulation for chronic headaches, a randomized, controlled trial.

Chronic headaches are a frequent cause of pain and disability. The purpose of this randomized trial was to examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex, reduces pain and increases daily function in individuals suffering from primary chronic headache. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial, where participants and assessors were blinded, investigated the effect of active tDCS vs. sham tDCS in chronic headache sufferers. Forty subjects between 18 and 70 years of age, with a diagnosis of primary chronic headache were randomized to either active tDCS or sham tDCS treatment groups. All patients received eight treatments over four consecutive weeks. Anodal stimulation (2 mA) directed at the primary motor cortex (M1), was applied for 30 min in the active tDCS group. Participants in the sham tDCS group received 30 s of M1 stimulation at the start and end of the 30-minute procedure; for the remaining 29 min, they did not receive any stimulation. Outcome measures based on data collected at baseline, after eight treatments and three months later included changes in daily function, pain levels, and medication. Significant improvements in both daily function and pain levels were observed in participants treated with active tDCS, compared to sham tDCS. Effects lasted up to 12 weeks post-treatment. Medication use remained unchanged in both groups throughout the trial with no serious adverse effects reported. These results suggest that tDCS has the potential to improve daily function and reduce pain in patients suffering from chronic headaches. Larger randomized, controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (2018/2514) and by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (54483).

Primary Headache Associated with Sexual Activity: A Review of the Literature.

This review summarizes the evolution in diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of primary headache associated with sexual activity (PHASA). Despite increased access to patient information and advances in imaging, the pathophysiology of PHASA remains not fully understood. There are many secondary headaches that may present with headache during sexual activity, and a thorough workup is indicated to rule out potentially life-threatening etiologies. Many recent case series discuss the efficacy of known treatments of PHASA, as well as suggest other potential therapies for this condition including the newer CGRP-targeted therapies. Headaches during sexual activity can be worrisome events which necessitate urgent evaluation, particularly when presenting with sudden-onset and severe "thunderclap" headaches. A thorough workup including imaging should be conducted to rule out etiologies such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, reversible cerebral vasoconstrictive syndrome (RCVS),vasospasm, and dissection. PHASA is commonly comorbid with migraine, tension-type headache, exertional headache, and hypertension. PHASA can present as a dull headache that progresses with sexual excitement, or an explosive headache at or around orgasm. Pain is primarily occipital, diffuse, and bilateral. The headaches are discrete, recurrent events with bouts that typically self-resolve, but may also relapse and remit or continue chronically in some patients. PHASA can be treated preemptively with indomethacin and triptans administered prior to sexual activity, or treated prophylactically with beta-blockers, topiramate, and calcium channel blockers. CGRP-targeted therapies may provide relief in PHASA based on a few case reports, but there are no randomized controlled trials looking at specific efficacy for these therapies.

The relationship between the frequency of headaches associated with the personal protective equipment and its influencing factors is mediated by depression: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundTo evaluate the factors affecting personal protective equipment (PPE) associated with headaches in healthcare workers during the first hit of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China in order to provide evidence for improving the prevention and treatment of PPE-associated headaches in frontline medical personnel. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, the baseline characteristics and the prevalence of the PPE-associated headaches among frontline healthcare workers at Wuhan Taikang Hospital were objectively evaluated by means of a questionnaire survey. We obtained predictors of PPE-associated headaches frequency by multiple regression analyses. The path analysis model was applied to determine the interrelationships between the variables related to PPE-associated headaches frequency. ResultsAmong the 520 participants, 436 (83.85 %) reported PPE-associated headaches during the anti-epidemic period. Compare with non-PPE-associated headache, age, PHQ-9 score >10, nurses, and PSQI>5were statistically significant found in participants with PPE-associated headaches. Multivariable linear regression showed that the occupation(nurse), pre-existing primary headache diagnosis, headache intensity and depression were risk factors for the frequency of PPE-associated headaches. The path analysis model observed that direct effects from occupation (nurse), pre-existing primary headache diagnosis, headache intensity and depression on the frequency of PPE-associated headaches. Depression indirectly mediated the effects of headache intensity and sleep quality on headache frequency. (All P < 0.05) ConclusionThis study provided a path analysis model that illustrates the relationships between PPE-associated headaches frequency and its related factors among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is crucial to the management of PPE-associated headaches to reduce its consequences for frontline healthcare workers.

Medication overuse headache: awareness and risk assessment among patients attending health care settings in Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia

Objective: This study aimed to assess the community awareness towards medication overuse headache (MOH), estimate people at risk of developing MOH and to identify the potential factors that affect awareness towards MOH. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in health care settings in Jouf region. The data were collected by interviewing patients using a structured questionnaire. Results: A substantial proportion of participants (89%) had not heard about MOH before. Tension-type headache was the most prevalent primary headache diagnosis (58%), the majority of participants experienced headaches 3-7 days per month (40.7%). Acetaminophen was the most common chronically used analgesic among primary headache patients. Conclusion: Migraine headache patients were considered at high risk to develop medication overuse headache. A significant association was observed between primary headache diagnosis and the perceived safest longest duration to use analgesics.

Diagnostic Algorithm for Pediatric Headaches: A Clinical Improvement Initiative

BackgroundThe widespread variation in diagnosing primary headache disorders in children and adolescents results in reduced quality and high costs. Defining an algorithm for primary headache diagnoses in children and adolescents is part of a larger initiative to standardize and improve care. The aim of this algorithm was to increase the accuracy of headache diagnosis by formal criteria to more than 80% of patient encounters. MethodsA team of headache specialists, nurse practitioners, nurses, data analysts, and business specialists developed an algorithm based on available scientific evidence. This algorithm was vetted and adapted by the neurology faculty and headache specialists until final consensus was reached. Following three months of testing and validation, the algorithm was disseminated to general pediatric neurology clinics. The following information was gathered: percent of encounters utilizing the algorithm, percentage of encounters with appropriate diagnosis by formal criteria, percentage of encounters with appropriate testing ordered, and average cost per headache visit. ResultsCorrect diagnosis of primary headache by International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 criteria improved from 72% to 90% and appropriate testing improved from 80% to 94%. By the end of analysis, 94% of encounters were correctly implementing the algorithm. A year-long tracking revealed decreased cost of headache evaluation by 6% compared with the year prior. ConclusionsA standardized algorithm improved the diagnostic accuracy in general child neurology clinics. Expanding the algorithm to primary care and pediatric emergency rooms could have a greater impact on headache evaluation and diagnosis; this should result in improved care and outcomes with reduced cost.

A state-of-the-art review of functional magnetic resonance imaging technique integrated with advanced statistical modeling and machine learning for primary headache diagnosis.

Primary headache is a very common and burdensome functional headache worldwide, which can be classified as migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia (TAC), and other primary headaches. Managing and treating these different categories require distinct approaches, and accurate diagnosis is crucial. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become a research hotspot to explore primary headache. By examining the interrelationships between activated brain regions and improving temporal and spatial resolution, fMRI can distinguish between primary headaches and their subtypes. Currently the most commonly used is the cortical brain mapping technique, which is based on blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-fMRI). This review sheds light on the state-of-the-art advancements in data analysis based on fMRI technology for primary headaches along with their subtypes. It encompasses not only the conventional analysis methodologies employed to unravel pathophysiological mechanisms, but also deep-learning approaches that integrate these techniques with advanced statistical modeling and machine learning. The aim is to highlight cutting-edge fMRI technologies and provide new insights into the diagnosis of primary headaches.

Reliability of a telephone interview for the classification of headache disorders.

The study aimed to test the reliability of a semi-structured telephone interview for the classification of headache disorders according to the ICHD-3. Questionnaire-based screening tools are often optimized for single primary headache diagnoses [e.g., migraine (MIG) and tension headache (TTH)] and therefore insufficiently represent the diagnostic precision of the ICHD-3, which limits epidemiological research of rare headache disorders. Brief semi-structured telephone interviews could be an effective alternative to improve classification. A patient population representative of different primary and secondary headache disorders (n = 60) was recruited from the outpatient clinic (HSA) of a tertiary care headache center. These patients completed an established population-based questionnaire for the classification of MIG, TTH, or trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia (TAC). In addition, they received a semi-structured telephone interview call from three blinded headache specialists individually. The agreement of diagnoses made either using the questionnaires or interviews with the HSA diagnoses was evaluated. Of the 59 patients (n = 1 dropout), 24% had a second-order and 5% had a third-order headache disorder. The main diagnoses were as follows: frequent primary headaches with 61% MIG, 10% TAC, 9% TTH, and 5% rare primary and 16% secondary headaches. Second-order diagnosis was chronic migraine throughout, and third-order diagnoses were medication overuse headache and TTH. Agreement between main headaches from the HSA was significantly better for the telephone interview than for the questionnaire (questionnaire: κ = 0.330; interview: κ = 0.822; p < 0.001). Second-order diagnoses were not adequately captured by questionnaires, while there was a trend for good agreement with the telephone interview (κ = 0.433; p = 0.074). Headache frequency and psychiatric comorbidities were independent predictors of HSA and telephone interview agreement. Male sex, headache frequency, severity, and depressive disorders were independently predictive for agreement between the questionnaire and HSA. The telephone interview showed high sensitivity (≥71%) and specificity (≥92%) for all primary headache disorders, whereas the questionnaire was below 50% in either sensitivity or specificity. The semi-structured telephone interview appears to be a more reliable tool for accurate diagnosis of headache disorders than self-report questionnaires. This offers the potential to improve epidemiological headache research and care even in underserved areas.

Evaluating Headache and Facial Pain in a Headache Diagnostic Laboratory: Experiences from the Danish Headache Center.

Diagnostic tests are not routinely used for the diagnosis of primary headaches. It is possible that laboratory tests could be developed and implemented at tertiary headache centers to be an integrated part of the diagnosis and management of headache patients, and laboratory tests that can be used on-site at headache centers could help in evaluating patients with secondary headache disorders. In this narrative review, we present some of the studies that have been made so far at the Headache Diagnostic Laboratory at the Danish Headache Center that aim to investigate and phenotype primary headaches and investigate secondary headaches as well as improve management. Semi-structured interviews and deep phenotyping, quantitative sensory testing, and provocation studies have been shown to be valuable in categorizing primary and secondary headache subtypes, possible pathophysiology, and defining needs for further research. In patients suspected of increased intracranial pressure, transorbital ultrasound with measurement of the optic sheath diameter may be useful in monitoring patients. The management of headache patients needs to be critically evaluated to optimize treatment continuously. A Headache Diagnostic Laboratory is very useful and should be an integrated part of headache care and management at tertiary headache centers.

Clinical Correlates of Osmophobia in Primary Headaches: An Observational Study in Child Cohorts.

Primary headaches, especially migraines, have a significant impact on physical and mental health, as well as on the scholarly performance and quality of life of children and adolescents. Osmophobia could be a potential diagnostic marker of migraine diagnosis and disability. This multicenter observational cross-sectional study included 645 children, aged 8-15, with a diagnosis of primary headaches. We took into consideration the duration, intensity and frequency of headaches, pericranial tenderness, allodynia and osmophobia. In a subgroup of migraine children, we evaluated the migraine-related disability, Psychiatric Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents, and the Child Version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Osmophobia was found to be present in 28.8% of individuals with primary headaches, with children suffering from migraines having the highest prevalence (35%). Migraine patients with osmophobia also showed a more severe clinical picture, with enhanced disability, anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, and allodynia symptoms (F Roy square 10.47 p < 0.001). The presence of osmophobia could help in identifying a clinical migraine phenotype coherent with an abnormal bio-behavioral allostatic model that is worthy of prospective observations and careful therapeutic management.

Headache and systemic lupus erythematosus: A narrative review

To review the epidemiology, the differential diagnosis, and the clinical and laboratory factors associated with the care management of headaches in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease and in 12%-95% of patients, the nervous system is involved. Headache is a frequently reported, although nonspecific, symptom that may potentially represent serious underlying diagnoses. Primary headaches may also occur in these patients, thereby causing a negative and significant impact on their quality of life. This is a narrative review. A literature review was conducted on the PubMed platform using the following terms: (1) headache and (2) lupus. All articles considered relevant were included. No limitations were imposed for the publication date. Headache is a frequent symptom in patients with SLE. Although its prevalence is similar to the general population, headaches nonetheless tend to have a greater negative impact on these patients. Patients with SLE are more likely to experience headache due to vascular diseases such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, stroke, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and vasculitis. Aseptic meningitis, neuroinfections, intracranial neoplasms, and intracranial hypertension or hypotension may also be a cause of headache in these patients. Although used in disease activity scores, the concept of lupus headache is controversial. Headache is a frequent symptom in patients with SLE. An appropriate approach enables the potentially serious conditions, which are the causes of secondary headaches, to be recognized and treated, together with an appropriate diagnosis and treatment of primary headaches.

The importance of the temporomandibular joint in the differential diagnosis of primary headaches and recurrent primary headaches

ObjectiveThe present article aims to popularize the temporomandibular disorder as a possible diagnosis when the phisician is facing a primary headache that was first thought to be a migraine headache or tension type headache, specially when they are not responsible to the treatment.MethodologyThis study focused on the clinical manifestation of the headache caused by temporomandibular disorder, with data searched in the National Library of Medicine, Scielo and PubMed libraries, from 2002 to 2022; also the 3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (2018) and the Continuum Headache (2021). The aspects of the clinical manifestation chosen for comparison were location of the pain, type of pain, crisis duration, improvement and worsening factors and associated symptoms.ConclusionIt is very reasonable to consider TMD headache as a first diagnosis when the complaint is a primary headache, as much as it is reasonable to consider this diagnosis when the refractoriness is the complaint. Also, considering the TMD as a trigger to the other headaches.

An unexpected effect of traumatic and bloody lumbar puncture among patients with primary headaches in emergency department

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the association between traumatic tap and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following lumbar puncture (LP) among patients who underwent LP with a primary discharge diagnosis of primary headache in the emergency department (ED). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who visited a single tertiary ED with the symptom of a headache and underwent LP for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis between January 2012 and January 2022. Patients who met the definition of PDPH and revisited the ED or outpatient clinic within 2 weeks of discharge were included. For comparative analysis, we divided the groups according to CSF RBC counts (group 1, CSF RBC <10 cells/μL; group 2, 10–100 cells/μL; group 3, ≥100 cells/μL). The primary outcome was the difference in CSF RBC counts between the ED or outpatient clinic revisiting patients who underwent LP within 2 weeks after discharge from the ED. The secondary outcomes were the admission rate and risk factors for PDPH; sex, age, needle size, and CSF pressure. ResultsData from 112 patients were collected; PDPH was reported in 39 patients (34.8%), and 40 (35.7%) patients were admitted. The median (interquartile range) CSF RBC count was 10 [2–100.8] cells/μL. One-way analysis of variance test of the mean differences among the three groups showed no differences in age, the duration of headache before LP, PLT counts, PT, or aPTT among the groups. There were differences in the number of admitted patients (30 vs. 7 vs. 3, P < 0.001) and the incidence of PDPH (29 vs. 6 vs. 4, P < 0.003). In the comparison of the PDPH and non-PDPH groups, there were differences in age (28.7 ± 8.4 years vs. 36.9 ± 18.4 years, P = 0.01) and the admission rate (85% vs. 9%, P < 0.001). ConclusionsNotably, our results suggest that traumatic LP may be an unexpected factor in reducing the occurrence rate of PDPH. Consequently, the admission rate for PDPH was significantly reduced among patients with traumatic LP and those with primary headaches. In this study, we collected and analyzed the data from a relatively small sample size of 112 patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between traumatic LP and PDPH.

S100B serum level: A relevant biomarker for the management of non-traumatic headaches in emergency care?

BackgroundThe diagnostic of primary or secondary headaches in emergency units is mostly based on brain imaging, which is expensive and sometimes hardly accessible. An increase in serum S100B protein has already been found in several neurological conditions inducing brain damage. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of S100B serum assay to distinguish primary and secondary headaches among patients with non-traumatic headaches in the emergency department. MethodsThis was a phase 2, prospective, monocentric diagnostic study. Eighty-one adult patients with non-traumatic headaches in the emergency department were included. In addition to the usual management, a blood assay of the S100B protein was performed in the emergency department, as well as a brain MRI between 48 and 96 h if not performed during the initial management. The primary or secondary headache diagnosis was made at one month by an expert committee, blindly of the results of the S100B assay. The primary outcome was the blood assay of the S100B protein. ResultsThere was 63 patients for analysis in the primary headache group and 17 in the secondary headache group. The S100B protein assay was significantly higher in secondary headaches than primary headaches, with an AUC of the ROC curve of 0.67. The optimal threshold of 0.06 μg.L−1 allowed to obtain those diagnostic characteristics: sensitivity 75% [48; 93], specificity 62% [48; 74], PPV 35% [20; 54] and NPV 90% [76; 97]. The association between the S100B protein level and the onset of pain was significantly higher for patients with headaches <3 h. ConclusionThe assay of the S100B protein could be useful in the management of this pathology in emergencies. Future studies taking into account dosing time and etiologies could be conducted in order to refine its use in practice.

Features of cerebral circulation in patients with chronic migraine

The relevance of differential diagnosis and treatment of primary and secondary headaches remains an important problem for physicians of various specialties. Migraine is a maladaptive disease, which necessitates further study of new pathogenetic mechanisms, symptomatic treatment improvement of migraine, as well as the development of more effective non-drug and drug methods for preventing migraine attacks. It is also important to determine the predictors of the chronic migraine development, which will prevent the episodic migraine transformation into a chronic form. The team of authors conducted a study to assess the degree of cerebral circulatory disorders in patients suffering from chronic migraine. The obtained results of the study made it possible to improve the diagnosis of both chronic and episodic migraine, to clarify the pathogenetic mechanisms of the formation of migraine attacks and the transformation possibility into chronic migraine. Practical recommendations have been developed to improve the effectiveness of ongoing symptomatic and preventive treatment, which improves patient’s quality of life. This article will be useful for doctors – neurologists, algologists, cephalgologists, GPs, doctors of functional and radiation diagnostics and doctors of other specialties, both for beginners and with experience

Clinical characteristics, medication use, and impact of primary headache on daily activities: an observational study using linked online survey and medical claims data in Japan

BackgroundLimited epidemiological data are available for headache disorders in Japan, and no recent studies have reported the impact of several primary headache disorders in Japan. This study aimed to report the up-to-date epidemiological data and impact of primary headaches on daily activities as well as the use of medical care, clinical features, and pain severity/activity impairment using nationwide data in Japan.MethodsWe used anonymized online survey data coupled with medical claims data, from individuals aged 19–74 years old, that were provided by DeSC Healthcare Inc. The outcomes included the prevalence of migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache, and other headache types stratified by age and sex, use of medical care, clinical features, medication use, and severity of pain/activity impairment. All outcomes were examined separately for each headache type. This is the second paper reported concurrently with this research.ResultsThe study population comprised 691/1,441/21/5,208 individuals with migraine/tension-type headache/cluster headache/other headache types, respectively. The prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache was higher in women than in men but was similar for cluster headache (male vs. female, 1.7% vs. 7.4%, 5.3% vs. 10.8%, and 0.1% vs. 0.1%, respectively). The percentage of individuals with migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache who had not seen a doctor was 81.0%, 92.0%, 57.1%, respectively. The common headache triggers were fatigue in migraine and tension-type headache, and weather-related phenomena and turning of the seasons in migraine. Common activities refrained from or reduced by headaches were “operating a computer or smartphone”, “drinking alcohol”, and “going to crowded places” in all three headache types and housework-related activities in women. Among individuals taking medicines, 16.8%, 15.8%, 47.6% with migraine, tension-type headache, and cluster headache reported moderate to severe pain, respectively, and 12.6%, 7.7%, 19.0% reported moderate to severe disability, respectively.ConclusionsThis study found various triggers of headache attacks, and daily activities refrained from or reduced by headaches. Additionally, this study suggested that the disease burden in people possibly experiencing tension-type headaches, many of whom had not seen a doctor. The study findings are of clinical value for the diagnosis and treatment of primary headaches.

Epicranial headache part 1: Primary stabbing headache

Primary stabbing headache is a common but under-recognized primary headache disorder. The objectives of this review were to provide practical information for better understanding and identification of the disease, suggest an algorithm for differential diagnosis, and provide an insight into the pathophysiology of primary stabbing headache hypothesized from its clinical course. This narrative review of primary stabbing headache is based on a literature search and the authors' clinical reasoning. The phenotype of each stab is typically abrupt, ultrashort-lasting (<3 s), focal or multifocal, paroxysms of pain occurring sporadically or in clusters. The diagnosis of primary stabbing headache is clinical; fixed or migrating stabs without background pain or sensory abnormalities and the absence of features suggestive of other disorders (e.g., cranial autonomic symptoms or signs) can aid in the diagnosis of primary stabbing headache. The clinical patterns include monophasic, intermittent, and chronic primary stabbing headache, of which the first two are considered typical. The pathophysiology of primary stabbing headache has not yet been elucidated. In this review, we postulated the mechanism of stabbing headache, based on the pain phenotype and clinical course, and provide a clinical algorithm for the differential diagnosis of primary stabbing headache. Knowledge about the typical manifestations and clinical patterns of primary stabbing headache will aid in the proper diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Treatment should be tailored by considering the clinical patterns. Further research is needed to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms and optimal treatment of primary stabbing headache.

Primary headache in academics: a cross-sectional study

Headache is a frequent, long-standing and universal neurological disorder with high prevalence worldwide. ObjectiveTo verify the prevalence of headache and self-medication among healthcare academics. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative study, carried out with 165 healthcare academics. A questionnaire was used as a methodological instrument to collect data. ResultsThe academics were mostly female, aged between 18 and 54 years, from the State of Paraiba and single. The lifetime prevalence of headaches was 98.2%. Most volunteers (62.4%) have a probable diagnosis of primary headache. Of these, the most prevalent was migraine, especially with aura, and tension-type headache (TTH). Of the group under analysis, the majority have not had consultations because of the pain and therefore have no medical diagnosis and no treatment. Some treated the pain only in a crisis. Of these, most practiced self-medication, mainly with dipyrone and paracetamol.Stress, worry and sleep deprivation were the most cited factors among those that usually cause pain. ConclusionClarifications, preventive measures, correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment can reduce the emotional, socioeconomic and academic losses of this frequent neurological complaint among students.

Clinical significance of asymmetric hypointense signals in minimum intensity projections of brain magnetic resonance imaging in children with primary headache.

This study aimed to observe the changes of venous continuity using the susceptibility weighted imaging-minimum intensity projection (SWI-MinIP) images in children with primary headache. The headache types were classified following the International Headache Society's diagnostic criteria. Patients with secondary headaches were excluded. The presence of asymmetric vasculature in SWI-MinIP images was visually assessed. Moreover, the relationship between headache patterns and asymmetric hypointense signals was analyzed. In this single-center, retrospective study from 2016 to 2020, among 251 cases of primary headache (male/female, 108/143; mean age, 11.4 ± 4.0years), 137 (54.6%), 75 (29.9%), and 39 (15.5%) patients had migraine, tension-type headache, and other primary headaches, respectively. On SWI-MinIP images, 14 (5.6%) patients showed an asymmetric venous pattern. All patients with SWI-MinIP asymmetry were included in the migraine group, accounting for 10.2% of patients with migraine. Five (35.7%) and nine (64.3%) patients were included in the aura and non-aura groups, respectively, without a significant difference in the frequency of asymmetric hypointense signals between the two groups (p = 0.325). All 14 patients with asymmetric hypervascularity had brain MRI within 12h of headache onset. Ten (71.4%) of the 14 patients showed consistency between the laterality of headache and the hemisphere of predominant vascularity in SWI-MinIP. Patients with migraine had increased cerebral venous perfusion in the most involved region of the headache on the SWI-MinIP view on a 3.0T scanner, which can be used as a qualitative indicator with low sensitivity and high specificity for the diagnosis of primary headache in the acute phase (< 12h).