Diagnosis Of Primary Cutaneous B-cell Lymphoma Research Articles

Dermoscopy and the diagnosis of primary cutaneous B‐cell lymphoma

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (PCBCLs) are frequently misdiagnosed, and a biopsy is needed to attain the correct diagnosis. To characterize the dermoscopic features of PCBCL. In this retrospective observational study, we analysed the pathology reports of 172 newly diagnosed PCBCL for the initial clinical differential diagnosis. The dermoscopic images of 58 PCBCL were evaluated for dermoscopic features. Two dermoscopy experts, who were blinded to the diagnosis and the study objective, evaluated images from 17 cases for a dermoscopic differential diagnosis. Of 172 biopsy-proven PCBCL lesions, cutaneous lymphoma was suspected by the clinician in 16.3%; the leading diagnosis was basal cell carcinoma in 17.4%, and other skin neoplasms in 21%. Studying 58 PCBCL dermoscopic images, we most frequently identified salmon-coloured background/area (79.3%) and prominent blood vessels (77.6%), mostly of serpentine (linear-irregular) morphology (67.2%). Dermoscopic features did not differ significantly by subtype or location. Blinded evaluation by dermoscopy experts raised a wide differential diagnosis including PCBCL, arthropod bite, basal cell carcinoma, amelanotic melanoma and scar/keloid. Two dermoscopic features, salmon-coloured area/background and serpentine vessels, are frequently seen in PCBCL lesions. These characteristic dermoscopic features, although not specific, can suggest a possible diagnosis of PCBCL.

Treatment of indolent primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas with subcutaneous interferon-alfa

Interferon-alfa is used in the treatment of primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL). Therapy with interferon-alfa has thus far been reported solely in case reports and small case series, mostly describing intralesional use. We sought to evaluate efficacy, response rate, time to response, duration of response, and safety of subcutaneously administered interferon-alfa for the treatment of cutaneous B-cell lymphoma. We conducted a retrospective chart analysis of patients given the diagnosis of PCBCL and treated with interferon-alfa subcutaneously at a tertiary referral center. Fifteen patients with indolent subtypes of PCBCL were identified. The overall response rate was 66.7%; all responding patients went into complete remission. Response was not significantly associated with the maximum tolerated dose. Within the median follow-up time of 40 months, 90% of the responders experienced a relapse; median duration of response was 15.5 months. Adverse events were predominantly mild and in no case led to cessation of therapy. Retrospective nature of the analysis and small number of patients because of scarcity of the disease are limitations. Treatment of indolent PCBCL with subcutaneously injected interferon-alfa demonstrated good response rates and tolerability. Response was not dose dependent. Relapses were observed in nearly all responding patients raising the question of interferon-alfa maintenance therapy in PCBCL.

The value of molecular diagnostics in primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas in the context of clinical findings, histology, and immunohistochemistry

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) is classified into 3 major subtypes: primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL); primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (PCMZL); and primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCLBCL, LT). Diagnosis of PCBCL is mainly based on clinical and (immuno)-histochemical grounds. We investigated the diagnostic value of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4 CT98-3936 protocol in PCBCL. We analyzed with the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4 CT98-3936 protocol skin specimens from patients with well-defined clinical and (immuno)-histologic PCBCL (n = 18) in comparison with benign lymphocytic infiltrates (n = 9). For molecular staging we also investigated 13 extracutaneous samples from 6 patients with PCLBCL, LT. Each sample was investigated at least twice. Monoclonality was detected in all of 5 PCFCL; 5 of 6 PCMZL; all of 6 PCLBCL, LT; and 2 of 9 benign lymphocytic infiltrates. In 5 of 6 patients with PCLBCL, LT, a clone corresponding to the clone detected in the skin was detected in 3 of 5 bone-marrow, 4 of 5 blood, and 1 of 3 lymph node specimens. DNA amplification using tubes A and B of IgH was not possible in PCFCL/PCMZL, benign lymphocytic infiltrates, and extracutaneous specimens of PCLBCL, LT, even after repeated analysis up to 11 times. Pseudomonoclonality was identified by repeated analyses in one case of PCMZL and in one case of benign lymphocytic infiltrate. A multicentric, randomized, blinded study is necessary to confirm our results. Molecular diagnosis supports the clinical and (immuno)-histologic diagnosis in PCBCL. In PCLBCL, LT, molecular staging may be useful. Tubes C through E of IgH and Igκ analyses seem to be superior to tubes A and B of IgH. Each sample should be analyzed at least twice to assess the possibility of pseudomonoclonality.