Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Research Articles

Is there a role of calprotectin testing in the diagnosis of surgical site infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty? A preliminary study.

Recent studies have revealed the usefulness of synovial calprotectin (CLP) in diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, there is still a lack of evidence to support the use of serum CLP in the diagnosis of early PJIs and surgical site infections (SSIs) after total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). The primary aim of this study is to investigate the standard kinetics of CLP concentrations in the blood during the very early postoperative period after non-complicated total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to perform a preliminary comparison of CLP concentrations between non-infected patients and patients with recognized SSIs. A total of 64 consecutive patients who underwent primary THA and TKA were included in this prospective research. Sixty patients (30 THA and 30 TKA) were scheduled to determine the standard shape of the blood CLP curve and the expected concentrations during the first 5 postoperative days after non-complicated TJAs. In 4 additonal patients, early SSI was confirmed, and they were included in a separate SSI subgroup. Calprotectin demonstrated a linear increase during the first 5 postoperative days. Statistically significant differences in CLP concentrations between non-infected cases and SSIs were not observed. The preoperative median results with interquartile range (Q1-Q3) were 0.52 (0.39-0.64) mg/dL and 0.5 (0.47-0.52) mg/dL (p = 0.77), while post operation they were as follows: on postoperative day 1: 0.88 (0.53-1.3) mg/dL and 0.86 (0.62-1.1) mg/dL (p = 0.84), on postoperative day 3: 1.77 (1.29-2.08) mg/dL and 1.85 (1.70-1.95) mg/dL (p = 0.72), and on postoperative day 5: 2.32 (1.79-2.67) mg/dL and 2.56 (2.25-2.83) mg/dL (p = 0.55), respectively. Serial CLP measurements during the early postoperative period revealed a linear (statistically significant) increase in concentration to postoperative day 5 without an evident point of decrease. A significant difference in median values and the course of curve patterns between the non-complicated and SSI groups was not observed.

Results of a monocentric field study: value of histology compared to sonication method and conventional tissue culture in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

To confirm the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) have defined criteria that include histology as a minor criterion and the sonication method only as an additional criterion. The aim of this monocentric, retrospective study was to investigate the value of histology and whether sonication leads to a more accurate diagnosis. All revision surgeries for knee and hip arthroplasty between 2017 and 2020 were included. With regard to microbiological diagnostic, conventional culture of periprosthetic biopsies and sonication of explant material were performed. In addition, histology and non-specific inflammatory markers (CRP, leukocytes) were recorded. A total of 78 patients with PJI and 62 aseptic controls were included. From both microbiological methods (conventional culture / sonication), Staphyloccus (S.) epidermidis and S. aureus were detected most frequently. However, compared to the conventional microbiology, a higher sensitivity was calculated for sonication, albeit with a lower specificity in relation to a PJI. In two logistic regression models for the significance of all diagnostic parameters in PJI, the AUC was 0.92 and 0.96 with histology in particular making the decisive contribution in both models (p < 0. 001, both models). Since histology showed the highest accuracy in the current study, its importance in the PJI criteria should be reevaluated. Sonication shows a high sensitivity for germ detection with a lower specificity and should only be used in combination with the conventional culture for microbiolgical diagnostics.

Synovial fluid NMR-based metabolomics in septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: Implications on diagnosis and treatment.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most challenging complications following total knee arthroplasty. Despite its importance, there is a paucity of reports in the literature regarding its pathogenesis. Recently, cellular metabolic reprogramming has been shown to play an important role in the progression and outcome of infectious diseases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the metabolites composition of the synovial fluid from patients with PJI or aseptic failure of total knee arthroplasties. The synovial fluids from 21 patients scheduled for revision total knee arthroplasty (11 with the diagnosis of PJI and 10 with aseptic failures) were analyzed using 1D 1H NMR spectroscopy. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyzes were used to identify metabolites that were differentially abundant between those groups. A total of 28 metabolites were identified and five of them found to be differentially abundant between infected and non-infected synovial fluids. Lactate, acetate and 3-hydroxybutyrate were found to be in a higher concentration, and glucose and creatine were found reduced in the synovial fluid from PJI patients. Synovial fluid from patients with PJI exhibit a distinct metabolic profile, possibly reflecting metabolic adaptation that occurs in the infected periprosthetic microenvironment. Further research and studies are warranted to gain a broader insight into the metabolic pathways engaged by both pathogen and immune cells in the context of a PJI.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee

Background: The role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as tools for monitoring the impact and outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is not well described. This study analyzed the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in a prospective observational cohort of patients with hip or knee PJI. Methods: The PIANO (Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational study) cohort prospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed PJI from multiple centers. The OHS and OKS were evaluated at PJI diagnosis (baseline) and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Scores and score changes were examined according to PJI type, patient characteristics, and management. A successful functional outcome at 12 months was defined as an OHS of &gt;38 or OHS of &gt;36 and/or an improvement from baseline of &gt;12 or &gt;9, respectively. Results: Of the 741 participants, PROMs were available at 12 months for 233 with hip and 342 with knee PJI. Significant improvements (p &lt; 0.0001) were seen at 12 months for both the OHS (24.5 to 36) and OKS (25 to 34), with no further improvement at 24 months. Patients with late-acute PJI had a higher median baseline OHS (35; interquartile range [22 to 46]) and OKS (30 [18 to 41]) than those with early PJI (OHS: 19 [15 to 29]; OKS: 22 [16 to 29.5]) or chronic PJI (OHS: 23 [14 to 34]; OKS 22 [14 to 28]). Logistic regression showed that a clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 2.76, p = 0.001) and early PJI (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.64 to 4.07, p &lt; 0.0001) independently predicted a successful functional outcome. Chronic renal impairment (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.71, p = 0.007), congestive cardiac failure (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.95, p = 0.04), and clinical signs of inflammation (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.85, p = 0.009) at diagnosis independently predicted failure to achieve a successful functional outcome. Conclusions: The OHS and OKS varied significantly at baseline and 12 months according to PJI type, emphasizing the need to consider the PJI type when evaluating treatment success. This study highlights superior functional outcomes associated with early PJI and with achievement of a clinical cure. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association Between Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a dreaded and unpredictable complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). In addition to causing substantial morbidity, PJI may contribute to long-term mortality risk. Our objective was to determine the long-term mortality risk associated with PJI following THA. Methods: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included adult patients (≥18 years old) in Ontario, Canada, who underwent their first primary elective THA for arthritis between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2021. The primary outcome was death within 10 years after the index THA. Mortality was compared between propensity-score-matched groups (PJI within 1 year after surgery versus no PJI within 1 year after surgery) with use of survival analyses. Patients who died within 1 year after surgery were excluded to avoid immortal time bias. Results: A total of 175,432 patients (95,883 [54.7%] women) with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 67 ± 11.4 years underwent primary THA during the study period. Of these, 868 patients (0.49%) underwent surgery for a PJI of the replaced joint within 1 year after the index procedure. After matching, patients with a PJI within the first year had a significantly higher 10-year mortality rate than their counterparts (11.4% [94 of 827 patients] versus 2.2% [18 of 827 patients]; absolute risk difference, 9.19% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.81% to 11.6%]; hazard ratio, 5.49 [95% CI, 3.32 to 9.09]). Conclusions: PJI within 1 year after surgery is associated with over a fivefold increased risk of mortality within 10 years. The findings of this study underscore the importance of prioritizing efforts related to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PJIs. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluating Modern Spacer Options and Outcomes in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

IntroductionA two-stage revision continues to be the standard treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in hip arthroplasty. The use of “functional” spacers may allow patients to return to daily living while optimizing their health for revision surgery. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of different spacer types regarding infection eradication, mechanical complications, and functional outcomes. MethodsPatients who have complete Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for diagnosis of PJI that underwent one-stage or two-stage revision were queried in an institutional surgical database between 2002 and 2022. Out of 286 patients, 210 met our inclusion criteria and were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, laboratory values, functional and patient-reported outcomes, and subsequent revisions. The study population had 54.3% females, a mean age of 61.7 years old, and a mean follow-up of 3.7 ± 3.2 years. There was no difference between age, body mass index (BMI), or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores between each cohort. Spacers were categorized as nonfunctional static, nonfunctional articulating, or functional articulating. Functional spacers were defined as those that allowed full weightbearing with no restrictions. Delphi criteria were used to define revision success, and failure was defined as a recurrent or persistent infection following definitive surgery. ResultsThere was a significantly lower re-operation rate after a definitive implant in the functional articulating cohort (P = 0.003), with a trending higher infection eradication rate and a lower rate of spacer failure compared to the nonfunctional spacer cohort. At 5 years, functional articulating spacers had a 94.1% survivorship rate, nonfunctional articulating spacers had an 81.2% survival rate, and nonfunctional static spacers had a 71.4% survival rate. In the functional articulating spacer cohort, 14.6% had yet to get reimplanted, with an average follow-up time of 1.4 years. ConclusionWithin this large cohort of similar demographics, functional articulating spacers may result in better clinical outcomes and infection eradication during two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI.

Hip Reconstruction In Situ with Screws and Cement (HiRISC) construct to treat large acetabular bone defects.

Large bone defects resulting from osteolysis, fractures, osteomyelitis, or metastases pose significant challenges in acetabular reconstruction for total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the survival and radiological outcomes of an acetabular reconstruction technique in patients at high risk of reconstruction failure (i.e. periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), poor bone stock, immunosuppressed patients), referred to as Hip Reconstruction In Situ with Screws and Cement (HiRISC). This involves a polyethylene liner embedded in cement-filled bone defects reinforced with screws and/or plates for enhanced fixation. A retrospective chart review of 59 consecutive acetabular reconstructions was performed by four surgeons in a single institution from 18 October 2018 to 5 January 2023. Cases were classified based on the Paprosky classification, excluding type 1 cases (n = 26) and including types 2 or 3 for analysis (n = 33). Radiological loosening was evaluated by an orthopaedic surgeon who was not the operating surgeon, by comparing the immediate postoperative radiographs with the ones at latest follow-up. Mean follow-up was 557 days (SD 441; 31 to 1,707). Out of the 33 cases analyzed, six (18.2%) constructs required revision, with four revisions due to uncontrolled infection, one for dislocation, and one for aseptic loosening. Among the 27 non-revised constructs, only one showed wider radiolucencies compared to immediate postoperative radiographs, indicating potential loosening. Patients who underwent revision (n = 6) were significantly younger and had a higher BMI compared to those with non-revised constructs (p = 0.016 and p = 0.026, respectively). Sex, race, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, infection status (patients with postoperative PJI diagnosis (septic) vs patients without such diagnosis (aseptic)), and mean follow-up did not significantly differ between revised and non-revised groups. The HiRISC technique may serve as a feasible short-term (about one to two years) alternative in patients with large acetabular defects, particularly in cases of PJI. Longer follow-up is necessary to establish the long-term survival of this technique.

Significance of serum protein electrophoresis in the diagnosis of Tsukayama type IV periprosthetic joint infection.

To investigate the efficacy of serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty. The medical records of patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty at a class A tertiary hospital between August 2013 and January 2021 were retrospectively investigated. A total of 179 patients were included and divided into two groups: 66 patients in the PJI group and 113 patients in the aseptic loosening (AL) group. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), D-dimer, Fibrinogen, Serum albumin and the proportion of serum protein in SPE were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the diagnostic value was compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). There was no significant difference in age, sex and body mass index (BMI) between PJI group and AL group (P>0.05), but there was significant difference in the ratio of hip to knee (X2=22.043, P<0.001). The CRP, ESR, D-dimer, Fibrinogen and the proportion of α1 globulin band in PJI group was 22.99(10.55,40.58) mg/L, 37.00(23.00,61.70) mm/h, 790.00(500.00,1500.00) ng/ml, 4.84(3.81,5.55) g/L and 5.80(5.00,7.73) % which was higher than that in AL group [1.89(0.50,4.12) mg/L, U=7.984, P<0.001; 10.10(7.00,16.90) mm/h, U=8.095, P<0.001; 570.00(372.50,780.00) ng/ml, U=3.448, P<0.001; 2.84(2.45,3.43) g/L, U=8.053, P<0.001 and 4.20(3.90,4.80) %, U=8.154, P<0.001]. The Serum albumin and the proportion of Albumin band in PJI group was 36.10(33.10,39.00) g/L and 49.00(44.95,52.20) % which was lower than that in AL group [38.10(34.00,41.10) g/L, U=-2.383, P=0.017 and 54.40(51.55,56.70) %, U=-6.162, P<0.001]. The proportion of In PJI group, the AUC of proportion of α1 globulin was 0.8654, which was equivalent to CRP (0.8698), ESR (0.8680) and outperformed that of fibrinogen (0.8025). Elevated proportion of α1 globulin in SPE presented with good diagnostic value for Tsukayama type IV PJI, and its accuracy was comparable to those of ESR and CRP. And α1 globulin can assist with CRP and ESR to determining the timing of second-stage revision.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) Are Predictors of Good Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Lower Limbs: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that develops after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), whose incidence is expected to increase over the years. Traditionally, surgical treatment of PJI has been based on algorithms, where early infections are preferably treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and late infections with two-stage revision surgery. Two-stage revision is considered the "gold standard" for treatment of chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as it enables local delivery of antibiotics, maintenance of limb-length and mobility, and easier reimplantation. Many studies have attempted to identify potential predicting factors for early diagnosis of PJI, but its management remains challenging. In this observational retrospective study, we investigated the potential role of inflammatory blood markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI)) as prognostic factors in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted, collecting clinical data and laboratory parameters from patients submitted to prosthetic explantation (EP) for chronic PJI. Laboratory parameters (PCR, NLR, MLR, PLR, SIRI, SII, and AISI) were evaluated at the explantation time; at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery; and at reimplantation time. The correlation between laboratory parameters and surgery success was evaluated and defined as infection absence/resolution at the last follow-up. A total of 57 patients with PJI were evaluated (62% males; average age 70 years, SD 12.14). Fifty-three patients with chronic PJI were included. Nine patients underwent DAIR revision surgery and chronic suppressive therapy; two patients died. Nineteen patients completed the two-stage revision process (prosthetic removal, spacer placement, and subsequent replanting). Among them, none showed signs of reinfection or persistence of infection at the last available follow-up. The other twenty-three patients did not replant due to persistent infection: among them, some (the most) underwent spacer retention; others (fewer in number) were submitted to resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis (Girdlestone technique) or chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy; the remaining were, over time, lost to follow-up. Of the patients who concluded the two-stage revision, the ones with high SIRI values (mean 3.08 SD 1.7 and p-value 0.04) and MLR values (mean 0.4 SD 0.2 and p-value 0.02) at the explantation time were associated with a higher probability of infection resolution. Moreover, higher variation in the SIRI and PCR, also defined, respectively, as delta-SIRI (mean -2.3 SD 1.8 and p-value 0.03) and delta-PCR (mean -46 SD 35.7 and p-value 0.03), were associated with favorable outcomes. The results of our study suggest that, in patients with PJI undergoing EP, the SIRI and MLR values and delta-SIRI and delta-PCR values could be predictive of a favorable outcome. The evaluation of these laboratory indices, especially their determination at 4 weeks after removal, could therefore help to determine which patients could be successfully replanted and to identify the best time to replant. More studies analyzing a wider cohort of patients with chronic PJI are needed to validate the promising results of this study.

Evaluating the Clinical Relevance of Routine Sonication for Periprosthetic Hip or Knee Joint Infection Diagnosis.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after joint arthroplasty. PJI screening and conventional cultures may be inconclusive. Sonication fluid culturing stands out as a valuable adjunct technique for PJI diagnosis. This study aims to determine the clinical relevance of routine sonication for all (a)septic revisions. All patients who underwent (partial) hip or knee revision arthroplasty between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We formed three groups based on the European Bone and Joint Society PJI criteria: infection confirmed, likely, and unlikely. We analyzed clinical, laboratory, and radiological screening. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for synovial fluid (preoperative), tissue, and sonication fluid cultures. We determined the clinical relevance of sonication as the percentage of patients for whom sonication confirmed PJI; 429 patients who underwent (partial) revision of hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Sensitivity and specificity were 69% and 99% for synovial fluid cultures, 76% and 92% for tissue cultures, and 80% and 89% for sonication fluid cultures, respectively. Sonication fluid cultures improved tissue culture sensitivity and specificity to 83% and 99%, respectively. In 11% of PJIs, sonication fluid cultures were decisive for diagnosis. This is applicable to acute and chronic infections. Sonication fluid cultures enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of PJI diagnostics. In 11% of PJI cases, causative pathogens were confirmed by sonication fluid culture results. Sonication fluid culture should be performed in all revision arthroplasties.

Diagnostic value of procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

The success rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment is still low. Early diagnosis is the key to successful treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to find a biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) for PJI was systematically evaluated to provide the theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment in this study. We searched the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed for studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of serum PCT for PJI (from the inception of each database until September 2020). Two authors independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each selected literature was evaluated by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the quality evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were merged by using Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. The area under the curve (AUC) and Q index were calculated after the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) was generated. We also performed subgroup analysis. A total of 621 patients were enrolled in the nine studies. The pooled sensitivity of serum PCT for PJI diagnosis was 0.441 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.384-0.500], the pooled specificity was 0.852 (95% CI, 0.811-0.888), the pooled PLR was 2.271 (95% CI, 1.808-2.853), the pooled NLR was 0.713 (95% CI, 0.646-0.786), and the pooled DOR was 5.756 (95% CI, 3.673-9.026). The area under SROC (the pooled AUC) was 0.76 (0.72-0.79). Q index was 0.6948. This study showed that PCT detection of PJI had poor diagnostic accuracy. Hence, the serum PCT is not suitable as a serum marker for PJI diagnosis.

Advancing the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Integrated Microfluidic Platform for Alpha-Defensins-Specific Aptamer Selection and Its Analytical Applications.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery, particularly total joint arthroplasty (TJA), due to the potential for implant failure and increased patient morbidity. Early and accurate detection of PJIs is crucial for timely intervention and better patient prognosis. Herein, we successfully screened a high-affinity aptamer targeting alpha-defensin complex human neutrophil protein 1-3 (HNP 1-3; potential PJI biomarkers in synovial fluid [SF]) for the first time using systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) on an integrated microfluidic platform. The compact microfluidic device enabled efficient screening, with each round completed within <2 h, comprising five rounds of positive selection, two rounds of negative selection, and one round of competitive selection. A novel one-aptamer-one-antibody assay was further developed from the optimal aptamer screened, and it could accurately quantify HNP 1-3 in SF within 3 h with only ∼50 μL of SF. The assay demonstrated strong binding affinity and specificity for the target protein in SF. Thirteen PJI SF samples were accurately diagnosed and the assay was accurate over a wide dynamic range (0.32-100 mg/L). This study has showcased a rapid and accurate diagnostic tool for PJI detection, which should see widespread use in the clinic, holding promise for potential analytical applications in orthopedic surgery and improving patient care.

Differences in the Synovial Fluid Proteome of Septic and Aseptic Implant Failure.

Implant loosening is a severe complication after total joint replacement. Here, differential diagnosis between septic and aseptic cases is crucial for further surgical treatment, but low-grade periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) in particular remain a challenge. In this study, we analyzed the synovial fluid proteome of 21 patients undergoing revision surgery for septic (eight cases) or aseptic (thirteen cases) implant failure using LC-MS/MS to identify potential new biomarkers as future diagnostic tools. Staphylococci were found in four cases, Streptococci in two cases, Serratia marcescens and Cutibacterium acnes in one case. Proteomic analysis of the synovial fluid resulted in the identification of 515 different proteins based on at least two peptides. A statistical comparison revealed 37 differentially abundant proteins (p < 0.05), of which 17 proteins (46%) showed a higher abundance in the septic group. The proteins with the highest fold change included the known marker proteins c-reactive protein (7.57-fold) and the calprotectin components protein S100-A8 (4.41-fold) and protein S100-A9 (3.1-fold). However, the protein with the highest fold change was leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) (9.07-fold), a currently discussed new biomarker for inflammatory diseases. Elevated LRG1 levels could facilitate the diagnosis of PJI in the future, but their significance needs to be further investigated.

Efficacy analysis of clinical serological indicators in the diagnosis of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.

To investigate the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) after primary joint arthroplasty; to analyze the optimal cut-off values of clinical serum markers C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI in RA patients; and to explore their diagnostic efficacy and clinical significance. Clinical data of 15,702 patients with RA (578) or OA (15,124) who underwent total joint arthroplasty from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Serum CRP, ESR, and D-dimer were recorded for each patient, and subject characteristic curves were used to determine the optimal threshold values of CRP, ESR, and D-dimer for RA-PJI and OA-PJI and to compare the areas under the curves to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the optimal threshold values of serologic indices for RA-PJI. The fiveyear incidence of PJI was 6.92% in RA patients and 0.67% in OA patients. The optimal thresholds of CRP, ESR, and D-dimer for the diagnosis of RA-PJI were respectively 13.85mg/L, 33.02mm/h, and 796.50ng/mL. The sensitivities of the optimal thresholds were respectively 67.6%, 62.2%, and 56.8%, and the specificities were 74.7%, 60.4%, and 74.4%. RA patients have a higher incidence of PJI than OA patients. The optimal thresholds for CRP, ESR, and d-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI were higher in RA patients than in OA patients, but the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis were not as good as in OA patients.

Commercial Synovial Antigen Testing is Inferior to Traditional Culture for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundDespite its limitations, a culture remains the “gold standard” for pathogen identification in patients who have periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, a synovial fluid antigen test has been introduced by a commercial entity. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the accuracy of the antigen test in the diagnosis of PJI. MethodsThis retrospective study identified 613 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty who had undergone preoperative synovial fluid analysis. A PJI was defined using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Patients who had an extended period (> 180 days) from aspiration to revision procedure (n = 62), those presenting within 90 days of their index arthroplasty procedure (n = 17), and patients who had an inconclusive ICM score (n = 8) were excluded. Using receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, we examined the utility of the microbial identification (MID) antigen test and any positive culture (either preoperative or intraoperative) in the diagnosis of PJI. ResultsA total of 526 patients were included. Of these, 125 (23.8%) were ICM positive and 401 (76.2%) were ICM negative. Culture demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864, sensitivity of 75.2%, and specificity of 97.5%. On the other hand, the MID test exhibited an AUC of 0.802, sensitivity of 61.6%, and specificity of 98.8%. The AUC of culture was significantly higher than that of the MID test (P = .037). The MID test was positive in 41.9% of culture-negative PJI cases. We also observed a high rate of discordance (29.7%) when both culture and the MID test were positive in the ICM-positive group. ConclusionsSynovial fluid antigen testing does not provide additional clinical benefit when compared to traditional cultures for the diagnosis of PJI. The antigen test had low sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI and a relatively high rate of discordance with culture. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Diagnostic and Predictive Efficacy of Synovial Fluid Versus Serum C-Reactive Protein Levels for Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Reimplantation Success

IntroductionA two-stage exchange revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with major risks for reinfection. Although serum markers are frequently used for diagnosis, their effectiveness remains debatable. Synovial fluid markers may offer a more accurate diagnosis of PJI; however, the importance of these biomarkers, notably synovial fluid C-reactive protein (syCRP), remains controversial, particularly in the context of reimplantation. The present study aimed to clarify these diagnostic uncertainties by evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of syCRP versus serum CRP (seCRP) levels in the context of PJI and recurring or persisting infections before reimplantation. MethodsA total of 186 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: aseptic revision (n = 112) and PJI revision (n = 74). Of the PJI group, 65 were categorized as success and 9 as failure, based on the presence of recurrent or persistent infection before reimplantation. The syCRP and seCRP levels and their changes were assessed preoperatively and in the first- and second-stage revisions. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC) were analyzed. ResultsBoth seCRP and syCRP levels were significantly elevated in the PJI group compared with the aseptic group (P < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis highlighted the enhanced diagnostic accuracy of syCRP for PJI, with an AUC of 0.93 versus 0.80 for seCRP. Furthermore, syCRP proved to be more reliable in predicting reimplantation success, exhibiting an AUC of 0.86 versus 0.63 for seCRP. In evaluating trends in CRP levels to determine reimplantation timing, changes in syCRP levels demonstrated superior diagnostic utility, exhibiting an AUC of 0.79 versus 0.63 for changes in seCRP levels. ConclusionIn assessing PJI and infections before reimplantation, syCRP may offer enhanced accuracy compared with seCRP. Nevertheless, variations in both syCRP and seCRP levels did not consistently predict the outcome of reimplantation.

Evaluation of Sonicate Fluid Culture Cutoff Points for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis.

Implant sonication is useful for recovery of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) pathogens in culture, but exact cutoff points for definition of clinically significant sonicate fluid culture results vary from study to study. The aim of this study was to define ideal sonicate fluid culture cutoff points for PJI diagnosis. Sonicate fluid cultures from hip and knee prosthesis components removed between February 2007 and December 2020 were studied. Prosthesis components were placed in solid containers in the operating room; in the clinical microbiology laboratory, 400 mL Ringer's solution was added, and containers subjected to vortexing, sonication and then vortexing, followed by centrifugation. Concentrated sonicate fluid was plated on aerobic and anaerobic solid media, and culture results reported semiquantitatively, as no growth, <20, 20-50, 51-100, or >100 CFU/10 mL sonicate fluid. Sonicate cultures from cement spacers and cultures yielding more than 1 microorganism were excluded. Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point was evaluated. A total of 1448 sonicate fluid cultures were evaluated, 68% from knees and 32% from hips. PJI was present in 644 (44%) cases. Sensitivity of sonicate culture was 75.0% at <20 CFU/10 mL, 55.3% at ≥20 CFU/10 mL, 46.9% at >51 CFU/10 mL, and 39.8% at >100 CFU/10 mL. Specificity was 78.2%, 99.8%, 100%, and 100%, at the 4 cutoff points, respectively. A cutoff point for sonicate fluid culture positivity of ≥20 CFU/10 mL is suitable for PJI diagnosis.

What Is the True Impact of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis on Mortality?

BackgroundMortality is a quality indicator that may affect expenditures. Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are, on average, more expensive and exhibit higher morbidity than aseptic revisions, although reimbursement is similar. Therefore, we sought to determine (1) impact on mortality rates of revision total hip and/or knee arthroplasty performed for PJI diagnosis (septic) versus aseptic revisions, at any point in time, and (2) mortality predictors among PJI patients. MethodsRetrospective chart review of 978 consecutive patients who underwent revision at a single institution (January 2015 to November 2020). All revisions were evaluated, and it was determined whether patients had a revision for PJI at any point in time or not. Two groups were compared: (1) patients with septic revision(s) (n = 350) and (2) patients who only underwent aseptic revision(s) (n = 628). Demographics and mortality status at latest follow-up (mean 3 years, range: 0 to 18 years, from first revision ever) were assessed. Mortality status was also separately assessed among patients who exclusively had hip revision(s), or solely knee revision(s), or both. Multivariate regression analysis (Cox) was used to determine whether PJI diagnosis was an independent mortality predictor. Among PJI patients, potential mortality predictors were evaluated. ResultsOverall, 65 patients died (6.6%). The septic cohort had significantly more men and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class-IV patients. Mortality rates were 10.9% and 4.3% (P < .0001) for septic and aseptic revision groups, respectively. After controlling for sex, ASA, and number of revisions, PJI diagnosis was a significant mortality predictor (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 4.7, P = .001). Among PJI patients, age (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.08, P = .009) and ASA (HR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.67 to 9.67, P = .002) were independent predictors. ConclusionsHaving a revision due to PJI diagnosis was associated with 2.5 times increased mortality. Therefore, more accurate coding capturing the complexity and morbidity of revisions for PJI diagnosis is needed.

Topical Application of Vancomycin Powder to Prevent Infections after Massive Bone Resection and the implantation of Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a serious burden in orthopaedic oncology. Through the years, several local expedients have been proposed to minimise the risk of periprosthetic infection. In this study, we report our outcomes using topical vancomycin powder (VP) with the aim to prevent PJIs. Fifty oncological cases treated with massive bone resection and the implant of a megaprosthesis were included in our study. Among them, 22 [(GGroup A) received one gram of vancomycin powder on the surface of the implant and another gram on the surface of the muscular fascia]. The remaining 28 did not receive such a treatment (Group B). The rest of surgical procedures and the follow-up were the same for the two groups. Patients underwent periodical outpatient visits, radiographs and blood exams' evaluations. Diagnosis of PJIs and adverse reactions to topical vancomycin were recorded. None of the cases treated with topical vancomycin developed infections, whereas 6 of the 28 cases (21.4%) who did not receive the powder suffered from PJIs. These outcomes suggest that cases treated with VP had a significantly lower risk of post-operative PJI (p=0.028). None of our cases developed acute kidney failures or any other complication directly or indirectly attributable to the local administration of VP. The topical use of vancomycin powder on megaprosthetic surfaces and the overlying fascias, alongside with a correct endovenous antibiotic prophylaxis, can represent a promising approach in order to minimise the risk of periprosthetic infections in orthopaedic oncology surgery.

Finding the Optimal Serological Screening Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Study

IntroductionNo single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Serological markers are often used as screening tools to avoid unnecessary joint aspiration in cases with a low probability of infection. This study aimed to determine the utility of standard-of-care serological tests as a screening tool for PJI in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty. MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 502 patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty between May 2017 and August 2021. A PJI was defined using a modified definition of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Plasma D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. There were 82 patients undergoing reimplantation who were excluded. Additionally, 8 patients who had an inconclusive ICM score were also excluded. Of the 412 included patients, 317 (76.9%) underwent revision for aseptic failure, and 95 (23.1%) had PJI. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the diagnostic utility of each serological test. A pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction was performed in order to determine whether the differences in areas under the curve (AUCs) between the tests were significant. Additional analyses were performed to find the threshold for each test that offered 100% sensitivity, allowing it to be the optimal screening test. ResultsAll four serological markers, D-dimer (AUC 0.860, sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 81.7%), CRP (AUC 0.862, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 70.0%), ESR (AUC 0.833, sensitivity 73.9%, specificity 85.2%), and fibrinogen (AUC 0.798, sensitivity 74.7%, specificity 75.4%), demonstrated comparable accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI (all P > 0.05). When maximizing sensitivity to 100%, D-dimer demonstrated the highest specificity (AUC 0.860, specificity 40.2%), outperforming ESR (AUC 0.833, specificity 3.3%), fibrinogen (AUC 0.798, specificity 2.3%), and CRP (AUC 0.862, specificity 0%). A plasma D-dimer level of ≥ 244 ng/mL was identified as the optimal cutoff for use as a screening test. ConclusionAlthough plasma D-dimer demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy as CRP, ESR, and fibrinogen, it outperformed all three aforementioned serological markers when used as a screening test for PJI.