Diagnosis Of Malignant Liver Lesions Research Articles

Predicting hepatocellular carcinoma: A new non-invasive model based on shear wave elastography.

Integrating conventional ultrasound features with 2D shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) can potentially enhance preoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) predictions. To develop a 2D-SWE-based predictive model for preoperative identification of HCC. A retrospective analysis of 884 patients who underwent liver resection and pathology evaluation from February 2021 to August 2023 was conducted at the Oriental Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital. The patients were divided into the modeling group (n = 720) and the control group (n = 164). The study included conventional ultrasound, 2D-SWE, and preoperative laboratory tests. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify independent predictive factors for malignant liver lesions, which were then depicted as nomograms. In the modeling group analysis, maximal elasticity (Emax) of tumors and their peripheries, platelet count, cirrhosis, and blood flow were independent risk indicators for malignancies. These factors yielded an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.81) with 84% sensitivity and 61% specificity. The model demonstrated good calibration in both the construction and validation cohorts, as shown by the calibration graph and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P = 0.683 and P = 0.658, respectively). Additionally, the mean elasticity (Emean) of the tumor periphery was identified as a risk factor for microvascular invasion (MVI) in malignant liver tumors (P = 0.003). Patients receiving antiviral treatment differed significantly in platelet count (P = 0.002), Emax of tumors (P = 0.033), Emean of tumors (P = 0.042), Emax at tumor periphery (P < 0.001), and Emean at tumor periphery (P = 0.003). 2D-SWE's hardness value serves as a valuable marker for enhancing the preoperative diagnosis of malignant liver lesions, correlating significantly with MVI and antiviral treatment efficacy.

The Clinical Value of Multimodal Ultrasound for the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Liver Tumors in Relation to Histopathology.

Recent advances in the field of ultrasonography offer promising tools for the evaluation of liver tumors. We aim to assess the value of multimodal ultrasound in differentiating hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) from other liver lesions. We prospectively included 66 patients with 72 liver tumors. The histological analysis was the reference standard for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions, and partially for benign tumors. All liver lesions were assessed by multiparametric ultrasound: standard ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using shear wave measurement (SWM) method and real-time tissue elastography (RTE). To diagnose HCCs, CEUS achieved a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value (PPV) of 69.05%, 92.86%, 78.57% and 93.55%, respectively. The mean shear-wave velocity (Vs) value in HCCs was 1.59 ± 0.29 m/s, which was lower than non-HCC malignancies (p < 0.05). Using a cut-off value of 1.58 m/s, SWM achieved a sensitivity of 54.76%, and 82.35% specificity, for differentiating HCCs from other malignant lesions. The combination of SWM and CEUS showed higher sensitivity (79.55%) compared with each technique alone, while maintaining a high specificity (89.29%). In RTE, most HCCs (61.53%) had a mosaic pattern with dominant blue areas corresponding to type "c" elasticity. Elasticity type "c" was 70.59% predictive for HCCs. In conclusion, combining B-mode ultrasound, CEUS, pSWE and RTE can provide complementary diagnostic information and potentially decrease the requirements for other imaging modalities.

Diagnostic Performance of Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in Solid Liver Lesions

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced sonography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions. A total of 156 patients with liver lesions were included in the study. The images from conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography and the shear wave velocity values of the liver lesions were obtained. The diagnostic performance of conventional sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and ARFI was assessed by using pathologic examination (needle biopsy or surgery) or clinical imaging inspection as the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional sonography for malignant liver lesions were 57.1% and 43.1%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of ARFI were 81.3% and 74.1%. When using contrast-enhanced sonography for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.9% and 89.7%. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced sonography were significantly higher than those of ARFI and conventional sonography (P < .05). The differential diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced sonography is most predictive of malignant liver lesions. Contrast-enhanced sonography and ARFI have complementary effects in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions.

Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: a meta‐analysis

International guidelines of Ultrasound recommend the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as the first method of choice after conventional ultrasound for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions. However, these recommendations are based on the results of multiple single studies and only few large multicentre studies. The rationale of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions. Literature databases were searched up to March 2012. Inclusion criteria were evaluation of CEUS, assessment of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model based on the DerSimonian Laird method. Quality analyses were carried out to assess sources of heterogeneity. A total of 45 studies with 8147 focal liver lesions were included in the analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions was 93% (95%-CI: 91-95%) and 90% (95%-CI: 88-92%) respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies. However, subanalysis revealed no significant difference when evaluating studies using histology for all liver lesions, when comparing high-quality and low-quality studies, and blinded vs non-blinded studies. The results of this meta-analysis support the international recommendations on CEUS for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions selecting patients who need further diagnostics.

Imaging of liver disease: Comparison between quadruple‐phase multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

To compare quadruple-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of focal and diffuse liver disease. Quadruple-phase contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI of 37 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed by two readers (R1 and R2). In patients with focal liver lesions, the gold standard was histopathology (n = 17) and/or long-term (>6 months) follow-up imaging (n = 27) or transarterial chemoembolization (n = 1). Diffuse liver disease was confirmed by histopathology in all patients, when present. Both readers identified 60 focal liver lesions on MDCT and 56 focal liver lesions on MRI. Gold standard diagnoses revealed 48 focal liver lesions in 25 patients. Diagnosis of malignant liver lesions revealed a sensitivity of 88% (R1) and 91% (R2) for MRI; 63% (R1) and 66% (R2) for MDCT; and a specificity of 75% (R1) and 79% (R2) for MRI; 50% (R1) and 64% (R2) for MDCT. MRI was superior to MDCT for the diagnosis of malignant focal liver lesions, when the mean areas under the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic curves (A(Z)) were compared (MRI = 0.93 vs CT = 0.69), (P < 0.00001). Thirty-three patients had histopathologically confirmed diffuse liver disease. Overall diagnosis of diffuse liver disease revealed a sensitivity of 88% (R1) and 92% (R2) for MRI; 75% (R1) and 74% (R2) for MDCT; and a specificity of 100% for both modalities by both readers. MRI is superior for the assessment of malignant focal liver lesions and diffuse liver disease compared to quadruple-phase MDCT, and can be considered as primary diagnostic imaging modality for liver imaging.

Accuracy of dynamic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions.

In order to assess the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic ultrasonography of malignant liver processes, 350 patients suspected of having malignant liver disease who had been examined sonographically were retrospectively classified as to the true diagnosis at the time of scanning. The true diagnosis was obtained in 218 cases. The prevalence of malignant lesions was 38 per cent. Comparison with the ultrasonographic findings yielded two false positive, five false negative, and eight inconclusive answers. The predictive diagnostic values were 97 and 96 per cent for positive and negative findings, respectively. It is concluded that in hospitals with an experienced ultrasound staff and modern dynamic gray-scale equipment, ultrasonography is the examination of choice in cases of suspected liver processes.