Diagnosis Of High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Research Articles

Role of DNA ploidy in diagnosis and prognosis of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A prospective cohort study.

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of DNA ploidy with cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and colposcopy in diagnosis of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and to assess the role of aneuploidy in cervical lesions with the worst prognosis. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted on 254 women with altered colpocytology. Colposcopy, biopsy, DNA-ICM and HPV examinations were applied to cervical cytological and histological samples. Participants were evaluated every 6 months and divided into two groups: 'Harm' and 'No-harm'. Logistic regression and multivariate COX model were used to identify independent risk factors for diagnosis and prognosis of high-grade CIN, and ROC curve to assess the sensitivity and specificity of methods. Variables 'age greater than or equal to 30 years', 'lesion size greater than 20%', 'aneuploidy' and 'HPV 16' were associated with diagnosis of high-grade CIN and 'aneuploidy' and 'women living with HIV', with a worse prognosis. Agreement for colposcopy was good, with a sensitivity of 79.3% and specificity of 94.4%; DNA-ICM and cytology were moderate, with sensitivity of 74.6% and 72.3% and specificity of 85.3% and 76.1%, respectively. High-risk HPV and HPV 16 tests were weak, with sensitivity of 75.0% and 43.75% and specificity of 50.0% and 88.64%, respectively. In relation to high-grade CIN diagnosis, DNA-ICM presented similar sensitivity and specificity to cytology and high-risk HPV test when associated with HPV 16. Regarding prognosis, this research certifies that aneuploidy is considered a predictor of more severe cervical injury.

The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by electrical impedance spectroscopy: The effects of acetic acid and tissue homogeneity

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of an electrical impedance probe (Epitheliometer) in the diagnosis of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women referred with cervical smear abnormalities and to assess the effect of acetic acid (AA) and tissue boundaries on the measurements. Methods A prospective observational study was undertaken in the colposcopy clinic. One hundred and sixty-five women, either with a clinical indication or abnormal cervical cytology, were recruited into the study. A pencil type probe was used to record impedance spectra from 12 points on the cervix before and after the application of 5% AA. Spectra were also recorded from tissue boundaries. Colposcopic examinations, including probe positioning, were video recorded to allow for correlations between histopathological diagnosis of colposcopically directed biopsies, colposcopic impression and the diagnosis based on impedance measurements. Results Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were derived. The areas under the curves (AUCs) to discriminate original squamous from high grade CIN were 0.80 (pre AA) and 0.79 (post AA). Comparison of these curves showed no significant difference, indicating that application of AA does not produce a large change in spectra. The probe could distinguish tissue boundaries from homogeneous tissue points. Conclusion The Epitheliometer has the potential to be used as an adjunct to colposcopy in the diagnosis of high grade CIN. It has the advantage of real time results, decreasing the need for diagnostic cervical biopsies, and facilitates a wider use of the ‘see and treat’ policy without the risk of overtreatment.

Validity of sampling error as a cause of noncorrelation

Sampling error is a common explanation of noncorrelation in women whose Papanicolaou (Pap) tests show high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) but whose follow-up cervical biopsies show only cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, koilocytosis, or reactive/inflammatory changes. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the validity of sampling error in this setting by determining the proportion of negative colposcopic cervical biopsies in women with HSIL who subsequently undergo cone/loop electrode excision procedure (LEEP) biopsies or repeat cervical biopsies that confirm the diagnosis of high-grade CIN (HGCIN). In all, 368 cases of HSIL were retrieved from the computerized database from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2005. Follow-up was obtained as part of routine quality assurance/quality control activities including cytologic-histologic correlation. A total of 368 HSIL Pap diagnoses were retrieved. Of the 254 cases that were followed up by cervical biopsy, 146 showed HGCIN in the biopsy. Of the remaining 108 patients whose cervical biopsies failed to demonstrate HGCIN, 47 had a subsequent procedure, either cone/LEEP, cervical biopsy, or repeat Pap test. Cone biopsy/LEEP was performed in 34 cases (72.3%) with a diagnosis of HGCIN in 19. Repeat cervical biopsy was performed in 9 cases (19.1%) with HGCIN diagnosed in 5. Repeat Pap test was performed in 4 cases (8.5%) with HSIL diagnosed in 2. In the population of women with HSIL by Pap test followed up by cervical biopsy with or without subsequent cone/LEEP, there was a discordant cervical biopsy rate for HGCIN of 43%. In the subgroup of women with HSIL by Pap test followed up by cervical biopsy and subsequent cone/LEEP or repeat cervical biopsy, the proportion of women with negative colposcopic cervical biopsy and subsequent histology-proven HGCIN was 56%. These figures justify sampling error as a valid cause of noncorrelation in women with HSIL followed up by cervical biopsy alone.