Diagnosis Of Drug-induced Liver Injury Research Articles

RECAM-J 2023-Validation and development of the Japanese version of RECAM for the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury.

The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is challenging. We modified the revised electronic version of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) for the diagnosis of DILI (RECAM), the scoring system developed in US and Spanish cohorts in 2022, and developed RECAM-J 2023 to align with the clinical practice in Japan. In the current study, we introduce RECAM-J 2023 and verify its performance in the context of Japanese patients with DILI. After translation of RECAM into Japanese, modifications were made to develop RECAM-J 2023 without any alteration to the scores. To examine the validity and performance of RECAM-J 2023, clinical information on DILI and non-DILI cases in Japan were retrospectively collected. The diagnosis of DILI was made by expert's decision. Then we scored each case using RECAM-J 2023, and calculated area under curve (AUC) values for identification for DILI. We collected data from 538 DILI and 128 non-DILI cases. The sum of highly probable (HP) and probable (PR) cases categorized by RECAM-J 2023 were only 206 (38%) in DILI cases. As the primary cause of low scores was the deduction with missing hepatitis virus markers, which is unlikely to be an issue in prospective applications, we rescored without these deductions. At this time, the sum of HP and PR was raised to 421 (78%). The AUCs of RECAM-J 2023 without deductions were 0.70 and 0.88 for identifying at least HP, and at least PR, respectively. RECAM-J 2023, when prospectively used without any missing hepatitis virus markers, provides acceptable performance for identifying at least PR DILI cases in Japanese daily clinical practice.

Interpretation of the Chinese guideline for diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury (2023 version)

Drug can cause almost all known types of acute, subacute, and chronic liver injuries. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important cause of unexplained liver injury in clinical practice. Correct diagnosis of DILI is challenging due to lack of specific diagnostic biomarkers, especially in patients with pre-existing liver disease and multiple concomitant drugs. A comprehensive understanding of the risk factors, clinical features, and prognosis of liver injury caused by different drugs will help physicians to recognize, diagnose, and manage it timely. Although the guideline was developed based on evidence-based medicine provided by the latest studies, there is limited high-quality evidence in the field of DILI. Therefore, this guideline should be interpreted with caution, and physicians should adopt an optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for individual patients within the framework of the guideline.

Screening drug-induced liver injury through two independent parameters of lipid droplets and peroxynitrite with a π-extended coumarin-based NIR fluorescent probe

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) or hepatotoxicity is a significant concern for public health. However, relying on a single biomarker for early DILI diagnosis poses a high risk of false positives. In this study, we reported a near-infrared fluorescent probe (BCOU-S), which enables independent visualization of LDs status and ONOO fluctuations. BCOU-S was constructed by combining a π-extended coumarin core as the NIR fluorophore and a methyl thioether group as the ONOO recognition site. BCOU-S could emit 655 nm NIR fluorescence excited at 518 nm, with a low detection limit of 27 nM and a large Stokes shift of 137 nm. The response mechanism to ONOO was confirmed by molecular orbital density function theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations. BCOU-S monitors LDs status through co-localization, oleic acid (OA) incubation, and starvation induction experiments. It sensitively distinguishes subtle changes in ONOO induced by different drugs in DILI cell models. In the acetaminophen (APAP)-induced DILI model, BCOU-S reveals significant LDs accumulation and increase in ONOO levels, establishing a clear time-effect and dose-effect relationship. Simultaneously monitoring ONOO levels and LDs accumulation, BCOU-S proves to be a more sensitive and effective tool for early DILI prevention, effectively avoiding false positives caused by changes in a single parameter. BCOU-S is a useful tool for further monitoring early DILI development.

Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major problem in the United States, commonly leading to hospital admission. Diagnosing DILI is difficult as it is a diagnosis of exclusion requiring a temporal relationship between drug exposure and liver injury and a thorough work up for other causes. In addition, DILI has a very variable clinical and histologic presentation that can mimic many different etiologies of liver disease. Objective scoring systems can assess the probability that a drug caused the liver injury but liver biopsy findings are not part of the criteria used in these systems. This review will address some of the recent updates to the scoring systems and the role of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of DILI.

Deciphering the liver enigma: distinguishing drug-induced liver injury and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease—a comprehensive narrative review

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) poses a complex and heterogeneous clinical challenge, which often resembles non-drug related acute or chronic liver diseases, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Furthermore, certain drugs can induce hepatic steatosis, which is considered a rare variant of hepatotoxicity. Additionally, the detection and diagnosis of DILI in patients with non-alcoholic liver disease present additional challenges that require attention. The importance of achieving an accurate diagnosis is highlighted by the different therapeutic approaches needed for each of these diseases. Nonetheless, as definitive diagnostic tests and distinct biomarkers often remain elusive, the differential diagnosis must rely on a combination of clinical, biochemical, histological, and immunophenotypic profiling. The diagnosis of hepatotoxicity is predicated upon the temporal nexus between the administration of a potentially hepatotoxic drug and the onset of hepatic injury, concomitantly excluding alternative hepatic pathologies. More frequently, this condition presents an acute course, with a more pronounced elevation of cytolytic and cholestatic parameters as compared to fatty liver disease. Advances in elucidating the underlying mechanisms hold promise for bolstering the diagnosis and management of these conditions. This article aims to thoroughly examine and emphasize the currently available scientific evidence to provide valuable insights into the diagnostic strategies for DILI, metabolic-associated liver disease, and drug-induced steatosis (DIS).

Bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline – a rare cause of drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a liver condition caused by any drug or toxic substance. The spectrum of DILI manifestations can range from asymptomatic elevation of liver enzymes to acute liver failure. Antibiotics are one of the major causes of DILI. The authors report the case of a 37-year-old male with nausea, right hypochondrium pain and fever with history of bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline combination treatment in the previous five days. DILI was suspected and other aetiologies of acute hepatitis were excluded such as viral, autoimmune or even haemochromatosis and Wilson’s disease. Liver biopsy was performed, being compatible with the diagnosis of DILI; DILI is a diagnosis of exclusion. Bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline combination treatment is a rare cause of DILI.

Liver biopsy for assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis clinical trials: Expert consensus from the Liver Forum.

Causality assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials can be challenging, and liver biopsies are not routinely performed as part of this evaluation. While the field is moving away from liver biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, information not identified by non-invasive testing may be provided on histology. To address the appropriate utilisation of liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment in this setting. From 2020 to 2022, the Liver Forum convened a series of webinars on issues pertaining to liver biopsy during MASH trials. The Histology Working Group was formed to generate a series of consensus documents addressing these challenges. This manuscript focuses on liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment. Expert opinion, guidance and recommendations on the role of liver biopsy as part of causality assessment of suspected DILI occurring during clinical trials for a drug(s) being developed for MASH are provided. Lessons learned from prior MASH programs are reviewed and gaps identified. Although there are no pathognomonic features, histologic evaluation of suspected DILI during MASH clinical trials may alter patient management, define the pattern and severity of injury, detect findings that favour a diagnosis of DILI versus MASH progression, identify prognostic features, characterise the clinicopathological phenotype of DILI, and/or define lesions that influence decisions about trial discontinuation and further development of the drug.

Investigating Acute Hepatitis after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Infection: A Genetic Case Series.

(1) Background: Despite the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination, rare cases of acute hepatitis developing after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine or the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have been reported. The aim of the study is to describe a case series of patients who experienced the onset of acute hepatitis, with or without autoimmune features, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection and to hypothesize a genetic susceptibility in the pathogenesis. (2) Methods: A group of patients with acute onset hepatitis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection were evaluated in our hepatology outpatient clinic, where they underwent biochemical and autoimmune tests. Hepatitis A (HAV), B (HBV), and C virus (HCV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections were excluded. Patients with a diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or drug-induced liver injury (DILI) underwent HLA typing and histological testing. (3) Results: Five patients experienced new-onset AIH after COVID-19 vaccination, one of which developed mild symptoms after vaccination that strongly worsened during subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection. One patient had AIH relapse after COVID-19 vaccination while on maintenance immunosuppressive treatment. All of them had HLA DRB1 alleles known to confer susceptibility to AIH (HLA DRB1*03,*07,*13,*14), and in three of them, HLA DRB1*11 was also detected. Two patients developed acute hepatitis without autoimmune hallmarks which resolved spontaneously, both positive for HLA DRB1*11. (4) Conclusions: An association between AIH and COVID-19 vaccine or infection can be hypothesized in individuals with a genetic predisposition. In patients without autoimmune features and spontaneous improvement of hypertransaminasemia, the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is probable. Further studies are needed to determine the presence of an actual association and identify a possible role of HLA DRB1*11 in the pathogenesis of acute liver injury after SARS-CoV2 vaccination or infection.

γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase-Activated Near-Infrared fluorescent probe for visualization of Drug-Induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), induced by overdose or chronic administration of drugs, has become the leading cause of acute liver failure. Therefore, an accurate diagnostic method for DILI is critical to improve treatment efficiency. The production of γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) is closely related to the progression of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. KL-Glu exhibits a prominent GGT-activated NIR fluorescence (734 nm) with a large Stokes shift (137 nm) and good sensitivity/selectivity, making it favorable for real-time detection of endogenous GGT activity. Using this probe, we evaluated the GGT up-regulation under the acetaminophen-induced liver injury model. Moreover, KL-Glu was successfully used to assess liver injury induced by the natural active ingredient triptolide and the effective amelioration upon treatment with N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) or Glutathione (GSH) in cells and in vivo by fluorescent trapping the fluctuation of GGT for the first time. Therefore, the fluorescent probe KL-Glu can be used as a potential tool to explore the function of GGT in the progression of DILI and for the early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of DILI.

Capmatinib-Induced Liver Injury as Emerging Toxicity of MET Inhibitors in Patients With NSCLC Pretreated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Safety data on MET inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 mutation and treated with frontline immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are still limited. Here, we describe clinical characteristics, liver biopsy features, and management of liver injury of two patients with a diagnosis of MET exon 14-mutant NSCLC receiving capmatinib after ICI failure. On the basis of histologic findings and exclusion of other potential causes, a diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) associated with portal fibrosis was made in both cases. The use of hepatoprotective drugs, in addition to oral ursodeoxycholic acid, resulted in liver blood tests normalization. To provide a global safety perspective, we queried the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and detected a robust disproportionality signal. Out of the 918 total reports with capmatinib from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database, DILI was recorded in 43 cases (4.7%), mostly serious (93.0%) with hospitalization and death recorded in 25.6% and 16.3% of the cases, respectively. The median time to onset was 42 days, with discontinuation and positive dechallenge documented in 41.9% and 39.5% of the cases, respectively. Anti–programmed cell death protein-1 agents were coreported in 11 DILI cases. Only two cases of DILI out of 105 reports were found for tepotinib. Our data support a potential association between capmatinib and DILI in patients who have also been previously exposed to immunotherapy. Considering the potential implications for sequence strategy and timing of ICI and MET inhibitor, further investigation is warranted.

A food product as a potential serious cause of liver injury

Introduction Drug-induced liver injury can be challenging to diagnose, as it can develop following the use of many prescription and nonprescription medications, herbals, and dietary supplements. Food products may not be routinely considered as a potential cause of hepatotoxicity. We describe the clinical features of two cases of acute liver injury following consumption of a smoothie product. Case presentations Two patients independently presented to the hospital with epigastric pain and acute liver injury. Both patients had consumed a new smoothie product in the same month that they presented to the hospital, with a recurrence of acute liver injury with further consumption. A diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury was established after the evaluation excluded other causes of liver injury. It was thought that a natural ingredient in the smoothie, tara flour, was the cause of hepatotoxicity based on prior news reports. Both patients stopped drinking the smoothie product with subsequent normalization of liver enzyme activities and no further recurrence of epigastric pain. Conclusion The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury largely relies on a compatible history and exclusion of other causes of liver injury. We demonstrate the importance of considering new food products in the differential diagnosis of acute liver injury.

Non-Solvatochromic Cell Membrane-Targeted NIR Fluorescent Probe for Visualization of Polarity Abnormality in Drug-Induced Liver Injury Mice.

Noninvasive visualization of liver polarity by using fluorescence imaging technology is helpful to better understand drug-induced liver injury (DILI). However, cell membrane-targeted polarity-sensitive near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent probes are still scarce. Herein, we report a non-solvatochromic cell membrane-targeted NIR small molecular probe (N-BPM-C10) for monitoring the polarity changes on cell membranes in living cells and in vivo. N-BPM-C10 exhibits polarity-dependent fluorescence around 655 nm without an obvious solvatochromic effect, which endows it with good capability for the in vivo imaging study. Moreover, it can rapidly and selectively light up the cell membranes as well as distinguish tumor cells from normal cells due to its excellent polarity-sensitive ability. More importantly, N-BPM-C10 has been successfully applied to visualize liver polarity changes in vivo, revealing the reduction of liver polarity in DILI mice. We believe that N-BPM-C10 provides a new way for the diagnosis of DILI.

Screening and optimization of a water-soluble near-infrared fluorescent probe for drug-induced liver injury monitoring

Peroxynitrite (ONOO−) is a potential biomarker of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and is involved in the process of DILI. Therefore, developing a reliable detection method for ONOO− will greatly contribute to ensuring drug safety and improving treatment efficiency. Here, based on the previous work, two kinds of NIR fluorescence probes PN and SPN were developed with phenyl-hydrazine as the ONOO− recognition group, which based on two fluorophores RN and SRN that are stable to ONOO−. A sensitive NIR probe SPN with good water solubility, low detection limit and good biocompatibility was selected through in vitro spectral property screening. Further experimental results show that there is a good linear relationship between the response intensity of probe SPN to ONOO− and the concentration of ONOO−, and the detection limit can reach 19.7 nM. At the cellular level, probe SPN can achieve a good and specific response to endogenous and exogenous ONOO−. Also, the probe SPN can be used for imaging and detection of DILI in zebrafish level and small animal level, indicating that probe SPN can be used as a powerful tool for diagnosis of DILI and efficacy evaluation of therapeutic drugs.

Liver injury related to Japanese herbal medicines: clinical features and diagnosis

The word “Kampo medicine” means the traditional Japanese herbal medicine. Even “natural herb” can cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI). In this review, the characteristics of Kampo medicine-induced liver injury (KMILI) are reported. The main causative herb involved in Kampo medicine is Scutellariae Radix. KMILI is based on certain hypersensitivity reactions. A small amount of Kampo medicine can cause liver injury, and KMILI can develop after a short latency period. The incidence of liver injury related to Scutellariae Radix is about 1%. KMILI is usually mild and not fatal. The latency period usually lasts 4 weeks to 24 weeks. Fatigue and loss of appetite are sometimes observed. Eosinophilia is not frequently observed. All three types of liver injuries are observed in KMILI: cholestatic, hepatocellular, and mixed types. In Japan, lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) has been generally used for the diagnosis of DILI; however, LTT is likely to yield false-positive result for Kampo medicines, and thus often leads to misdiagnosis in many cases. Recently, researchers reported that a specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype is possibly associated with KMILI. This hypothesis needs to be examined further. Although Kampo medicine is based on rich knowledge and experience that occurred over a period of thousands of years, much is still unknown about KMILI.

In silico prediction of drug-induced liver injury with a complementary integration strategy based on hybrid representation.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the major causes of drug withdrawals, acute liver injury and blackbox warnings. Clinical diagnosis of DILI is a huge challenge due to the complex pathogenesis and lack of specific biomarkers. In recent years, machine learning methods have been used for DILI risk assessment, but the model generalization does not perform satisfactorily. In this study, we constructed a large DILI data set and proposed an integration strategy based on hybrid representations for DILI prediction (HR-DILI). Benefited from feature integration, the hybrid graph neural network models outperformed single representation-based models, among which hybrid-GraphSAGE showed balanced performance in cross-validation with AUC (area under the curve) as 0.804 ± 0.019. In the external validation set, HR-DILI improved the AUC by 6.4%-35.9% compared to the base model with a single representation. Compared with published DILI prediction models, HR-DILI had better and balanced performance. The performance of local models for natural products and synthetic compounds were also explored. Furthermore, eight key descriptors and six structural alerts associated with DILI were analyzed to increase the interpretability of the models. The improved performance of HR-DILI indicated that it would provide reliable guidance for DILI risk assessment.

Immunophenotyping to improve the mechanistic understanding of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: clinical implications and future directions

The late event onset of a fraction of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) cases and the link observed by genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of certain human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles with DILI due to specific drugs support the crucial role of the immune system (both innate and adaptive) in the pathogenesis of DILI. Recent advances in both flow and mass cytometry have allowed the profiling of all major immune cell types in a given sample. Therefore, determining the lymphocyte populations in samples from patients with DILI would facilitate the development of specific biomarkers for DILI diagnosis and prognosis. To date, a few studies have explored the immune landscape in DILI. In a recent study of leukocyte immunophenotyping using flow cytometry from the Spanish DILI Registry, an important role of adaptive immune response in DILI is suggested. DILI patients had significantly higher levels of T helper 1 (Th1) cells and activated helper and cytotoxic T cells than healthy controls. Furthermore, the increased expression of negative immune checkpoints and ligands in DILI patients could reflect a restoration of the immune homeostasis. Differences in the profile of cytokines in DILI patients from the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) also suggest an involvement of both innate and adaptive immune systems in DILI development and prognosis. Moreover, several studies based on immunophenotyping of liver infiltrates showed a distinctive pattern of cellular infiltrates in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-DILI, with lower levels of plasma cells, CD20+ B cells and CD4+ T cells than in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients. These pioneering studies highlight the importance of immunophenotyping for the mechanistic understanding of DILI. In this review, available data on immunophenotyping in DILI are gathered, and the potential clinical applications of cutting-edge, novel immunophenotyping techniques are discussed.

Chinese guideline for diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury (2023 version)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important adverse drug reaction that can lead to acute liver failure or even death in severe cases. Currently, the diagnosis of DILI still follows the strategy of exclusion. Therefore, a detailed history taking and a thorough and careful exclusion of other potential causes of liver injury is the key to correct diagnosis. This guideline was developed based on evidence-based medicine provided by the latest research advances and aims to provide professional guidance to clinicians on how to identify suspected DILI timely and standardize the diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Based on the clinical settings in China, the guideline also specifically focused on DILI in chronic liver disease, drug-induced viral hepatitis reactivation, common causing agents of DILI (herbal and dietary supplements, anti-tuberculosis drugs, anti-neoplastic drugs), and signal and assessment of DILI in clinical trials.

Significance of histological assessment in drug-induced liver injury

Liver histological assessment is of great clinical significance for the diagnosis, classification, and prognosis prediction of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Liver histological evaluation can effectively supplement RUCAM. The clinical phenotypes of DILI are complex and diverse, including acute, chronic and severe hepatic injury. DILI has multiple insult-targets, including hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, and vascular endothelial cells and others. The pathological damage patterns are similar to many types of non-DILI liver diseases, therefore making differential diagnosis difficult. New anti-tumor drugs such as immune checkpoints inhibitors and targeted therapy are widely used in clinical antineoplastic practice, thus the growing incidence of related liver injury occurs. Liver histological examination can effectively assess the pathological phenotypes and severity of DILI, so as to guide treatment. In uncommon conditions such as special types of DILI (such as hepatic vascular disease), DILI with other competitive etiology overlapping, chronic DILI, and DILI induced liver failure, liver histological assessment can provide strong support for identifying the cause, rational treatment, and prognosis. Currently, the histological evaluation system for drug-induced liver injury seems to be a lack of consensus, and the diagnosis of DILI is short of highly specific and sensitive serological markers. All in all, liver histological assessment plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of DILI.

Standardize the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury, and strengthen clinical and translational research

As a liver disease with the most complex clinical phenotype, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) poses great challenges in diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Although guidelines based on the latest research advances can provide clinicians with guidance on the identification, diagnosis, and management of DILI, the overall level of evidence in this field is relatively low and high-level evidence is limited. Therefore, we should interpret guidelines with caution and look forward to more clinical and translational research to address the huge unmet clinical needs in DILI.

Comparative analysis of clinical diagnosis and treatment guidelines for drug-induced liver injury at home and abroad

Drug-induced liver injury influencing factors are complex and have diverse clinical manifestations. Simple and reliable diagnostic methods are still deficient, and further classification of toxicological mechanisms is required. There are numerous pertinent discrepancies between domestic and international guidelines aimed at drug-induced liver injury diagnosis and treatment, with partial to no consensus on the content. The American Gastroenterological Association's 2021 Clinical Guidelines, the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver's 2021 Consensus Guidelines, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences' 2020 International Consensus, the European Society's Hepatology Committee's 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the 2015 Chinese Medical Association Guidelines are five influential clinical guidelines on drug-induced liver injury at home and abroad. The epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and evaluation, treatment management, and other contents, particularly traditional Chinese medicine, were compared and analyzed using other relevant consensus opinions or guidelines in order to improve understanding and provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury.