Diagnosis Of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Research Articles

Disseminated intravascular coagulation is associated with poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and significance of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A multicenter cohort study was conducted using large-scale COVID-19 registry data. The patients were classified into DIC and non-DIC groups based on the diagnosis on admission (day 1) and on any of the days 1, 4, 8, and 15. In total, 23,054 patients were divided into DIC (n = 264) and non-DIC (n = 22,790) groups on admission. Thereafter, 1654 patients were divided into 181 patients with DIC and 1473 non-DIC patients based on the DIC diagnosis on any of the days from 1 to 15. DIC incidence was 1.1% on admission, increasing to 10.9% by day 15. DIC diagnosis on admission had moderate predictive performance for developing multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) on day 4 and in-hospital death and was independently associated with MODS and in-hospital death. DIC diagnosis on any of the days from 1 to 15, especially days 8 and 15, was associated with lower survival probability than those without DIC and showed significant association with in-hospital death. In conclusion, despite its low incidence, DIC, particularly late-onset DIC, plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19.

Septic Abortion Complicated by Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

This scenario was developed to educate emergency medicine residents on the diagnosis and management of two concurrent conditions: septic abortion and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Patients with an abortion (spontaneous or induced) of less than twenty weeks gestation may present with concurrent uterine infection, also known as septic abortion. One of the complications of septic abortion is DIC. Early management of both underlying etiology (septic abortion) and subsequent complications (DIC) is crucial to minimize morbidity and mortality. At the conclusion of the simulation session, learners will be able to: 1) Obtain a relevant focused history including pregnancy history, medication use, and past medical history. 2) Develop a differential for fever and vaginal bleeding in a pregnant patient. 3) Discuss management of septic abortion, including empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics and obstetric consultation for source control with dilation and curettage (D&C). 4) Discuss expected laboratory findings of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). 5) Discuss management of DIC, including identification of underlying etiology and supportive resuscitation with blood products. 6) Review the components of blood products. 7) Identify appropriate disposition of the patient to the intensive care unit (ICU). This session was conducted using high-fidelity simulation followed by a debriefing session and discussion about the diagnosis, differential, and management of both septic abortion and DIC. Debriefing methods may be left to the discretion of participants, but the authors have utilized advocacy-inquiry techniques. In this technique, the facilitator described something they observed in the case, outlined their reasoning as a facilitator why this observation was important or why they had questions, and then asked the learners to share their frame of reference at the time. An example: "I heard the team leader state that the platelets were normal, but then another resident disagreed. No one paused to come to a consensus. I'm wondering why this wasn't explored further in real time. Tell me more." This scenario may also be run as an oral boards case or adapted for other learners such as critical care fellows. Our residents were provided a survey at the completion of the debriefing session so they could rate different aspects of the simulation, as well as provide qualitative feedback on the scenario. The local institution's simulation center's electronic feedback form is based on the Center of Medical Simulation's Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) Student Version Short Form,1 with the inclusion of required qualitative feedback if an element was scored less than a 6 or 7. Thirteen learners completed a feedback form out of seventeen participants. This session received all six and seven scores (consistently effective/very good and extremely effective/outstanding, respectively) other than two isolated 4 scores. This is a cost-effective method for reviewing septic abortion and DIC. The case may be modified for appropriate audiences, such as simplifying the case to septic abortion without DIC. You can also consider not showing an initial temperature with the initial set of vitals unless it is specifically asked for by the participants. We encourage readers to utilize bleeding moulage techniques as a visual stimulus to increase psychological buy-in. Medical simulation, septic abortion, pregnancy complications, hematology emergencies, obstetric emergencies, disseminated intravascular coagulation, emergency medicine.

Differences between Japanese new criteria and pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC scores for obstetrical DIC diagnosis.

The new Japanese diagnostic criteria for obstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (tentative version) were released in June 2022. We aimed to demonstrate the differences in characteristics between women with DIC diagnosed using the new Japanese criteria and those diagnosed using the pregnancy-specific modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis DIC score, also known as the pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC score, which was released in 2014. In this retrospective cohort study, all participants were retrospectively diagnosed based on both criteria. Six women were diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on both criteria (Group A). Of the 43 women diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on the worldwide criteria, 36 were diagnosed with non-obstetrical DIC based on the new Japanese criteria (Group B). Group A had significantly lower fibrinogen levels and significantly higher prothrombin time differences and scores of underlying diseases (particularly postpartum hemorrhage with coagulopathy) and laboratory findings than Group B. Additionally, Group A had significantly higher rates of platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion therapy for obstetrical DIC and more transfusions of fresh frozen plasma and/or cryoprecipitate, red blood cells and PC than Group B. Thus, the new Japanese criteria detected more severe cases of obstetrical DIC compared with the worldwide criteria.

Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of 71 patients with gastric cancer and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Gastric cancer consists of solid tumors with a tendency for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). DIC is rare in patients with stomach cancer, and there have been few studies on this condition. We aimed to perform comprehensive analyses of the prognosis and clinicopathologic characteristics of stomach cancer patients with DIC. Between June 2006 and March 2020, 14,016 patients at Fujian Cancer Hospital were diagnosed with stomach cancer. We reviewed their medical records and found that 105 of these patients were diagnosed with DIC. After excluding patients who were lost to follow-up, 71 patients with DIC remained. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed to observe clinical characteristics and prognostic factors, and the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Prognostic variables were investigated by the Cox proportional hazards method. The median age was 54 (range, 21-83) years, and 38 patients (53.5%) were male. The histological category was poorly differentiated gastric cancer in 58 patients (81.7%). Eleven patients (15.5%) developed DIC after curative gastric resection. Sixty patients (84.5%) had DIC at the initial presentation of gastric cancer or developed DIC when the tumor progressed during treatment. Fifty-one patients (71.8%) had bleeding symptoms, and 43 (60.6%) patients had comorbidities at the time of DIC diagnosis. Among the 71 patients, 42 (59.2%) had multiple metastatic patterns. Twenty-one (29.6%) patients received chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 57.0 days (95% confidence interval [CI] [33.1-80.9] days). Tumor status (P = 0.000) and treatment (P = 0.003) were found to be significant variables associated with OS by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor status (P = 0.000) and treatment (P = 0.000) had independent effects on OS. Gastrointestinal bleeding, multiple metastatic patterns and comorbidities at diagnosis with DIC are common in patients with gastric cancer complicated with DIC. Patients with poorly differentiated gastric cancer are more likely to develop DIC. Treatment and tumor status are separate risk variables for the survival of gastric cancer patients with DIC.DIC patients without tumors have a good prognosis and can be cured by appropriate etiological correction and symptomatic treatment. Chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of DIC patients with tumors.

A survey of the current status of neonatal disseminated intravascular coagulation in neonatal intensive care units in Kyushu, Japan

Neonatal disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a rare disease with a poor outcome. However, data on the incidence, treatment, and outcome of neonatal DIC are scarce. Thus, this study investigated the status of neonatal DIC in Japan. We sent a retrospective questionnaire-based survey regarding the status of diagnosis and treatment of neonatal DIC from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018, to 30 hospitals in Kyushu with a neonatal-perinatal medicine division. The data collected by the questionnaire survey included information about the patients diagnosed with neonatal DIC. Among the 13,582 neonates surveyed, 120 (0.9%) were diagnosed with DIC. Of them, clinical data were available for 105 cases. There were 11 deaths (mortality rate: 10.4%), with the most common underlying condition being infection (n=9), followed by neonatal asphyxia and hematologic disease (both, n=1). Compared with the survival group, the death group had more infections, as well as a higher rate of bleeding symptoms and organ dysfunction. Neonatal DIC associated with infectious diseases has a poor outcome. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate diagnostic and treatment guidelines for early intervention in such cases.

Phenotypes of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Two phenotypes of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are systematically reviewed. DIC is classified into thrombotic and fibrinolytic phenotypes characterized by thrombosis and hemorrhage, respectively. Major pathology of DIC with thrombotic phenotype is the activation of coagulation, insufficient anticoagulation with endothelial injury, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1-mediated inhibition of fibrinolysis, leading to microvascular fibrin thrombosis and organ dysfunction. DIC with fibrinolytic phenotype is defined as massive thrombin generation commonly observed in any type of DIC, combined with systemic pathologic hyperfibrinogenolysis caused by underlying disorder that results in severe bleeding due to excessive plasmin formation. Three major pathomechanisms of systemic hyperfibrinogenolysis have been considered: (1) acceleration of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) release from hypoxic endothelial cells and t-PA-rich storage pools, (2) enhancement of the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin due to specific proteins and receptors that are expressed on cancer cells and endothelial cells, and (3) alternative pathways of fibrinolysis. DIC with fibrinolytic phenotype can be diagnosed by DIC diagnosis followed by the recognition of systemic pathologic hyperfibrin(ogen)olysis. Low fibrinogen levels, high fibrinogen and fibrin degradation products (FDPs), and the FDP/D-dimer ratio are important for the diagnosis of systemic pathologic hyperfibrin(ogen)olysis. Currently, evidence-based treatment strategies for DIC with fibrinolytic phenotypes are lacking. Tranexamic acid appears to be one of the few methods to be effective in the treatment of systemic pathologic hyperfibrin(ogen)olysis. International cooperation for the elucidation of pathomechanisms, establishment of diagnostic criteria, and treatment strategies for DIC with fibrinolytic phenotype are urgent issues in the field of thrombosis and hemostasis.

Net reclassification index in comparison of prognostic value of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria by Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: a multicenter prospective cohort study

BackgroundWe compared the prognostic value of the Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (JSTH) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) diagnostic criteria with that of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) DIC diagnostic criteria for 28-day in-hospital mortality.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study involving two hematology departments, four emergency departments, and one general medicine department in Japan between August 2017 and July 2021. We assessed three ISTH DIC diagnostic criteria categories using low cutoff levels of D-dimer (low D-dimer), high cutoff levels of D-dimer (high D-dimer), and fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products (FDP) as fibrin-related markers. The main outcome was diagnosis-based category additive net reclassification index (NRI).ResultsA total of 222 patients were included: 82 with hematopoietic disorders, 86 with infections, and 54 with other diseases. The 28-day in-hospital mortality rate was 14% (n = 31). The DIC rates diagnosed by the JSTH, ISTH-low D-dimer, high D-dimer, and FDP DIC diagnosis were 52.7%, 47.3%, 42.8%, and 27.0%, respectively. The overall category additive NRI by JSTH DIC diagnosis vs. ISTH-low D-dimer, high D-dimer, and FDP DIC diagnosis were − 10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −28 to 8, p = 0.282), − 7.8 (95% CI: −26 to 10, p = 0.401), and − 11 (95% CI: −26 to 3, p = 0.131), respectively.ConclusionsJSTH criterion showed the highest sensitivity for DIC diagnosis that did not improve but reflected the same prognostic value for mortality evaluated using ISTH DIC diagnosis criteria. This finding may help clinicians to use JSTH DIC criterion as an early intervention strategy in patients with coagulopathy.

The Intricate Role of Non-Coding RNAs in Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) is a type of tissue and organ dysregulation in sepsis, due mainly to the effect of the inflammation on the coagulation system. Unfortunately, the underlying molecular mechanisms that lead to this disorder are not fully understood. Moreover, current biomarkers for DIC, including biological and clinical parameters, generally provide a poor diagnosis and prognosis. In recent years, non-coding RNAs have been studied as promising and robust biomarkers for a variety of diseases. Thus, their potential in the diagnosis and prognosis of DIC should be further studied. Specifically, the relationship between the coagulation cascade and non-coding RNAs should be established. In this review, microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and circular RNAs are studied in relation to DIC. Specifically, the axis between these non-coding RNAs and the corresponding affected pathway has been identified, including inflammation, alteration of the coagulation cascade, and endothelial damage. The main affected pathway identified is PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis, where several ncRNAs participate in its regulation, including miR-122-5p which is sponged by circ_0005963, ciRS-122, and circPTN, and miR-19a-3p which is modulated by circ_0000096 and circ_0063425. Additionally, both miR-223 and miR-24 were found to affect the PI3K/AKT pathway and were regulated by lncGAS5 and lncKCNQ1OT1, respectively. Thus, this work provides a useful pipeline of inter-connected ncRNAs that future research on their impact on DIC can further explore.

Sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: an international estrangement of disease concept.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is an acquired syndrome characterized by widespread intravascular activation of coagulation, which can be caused by infectious and noninfectious insults, such as trauma, postcardiac arrest syndrome, and malignant diseases. At present, diagnosis and treatment of DIC clearly differ between Japan and Western countries; in Japan, DIC has long been considered a therapeutic target, and much evidence on DIC has been published. However, there has recently been no international consensus on whether DIC should be a therapeutic target with anticoagulant therapy. This review describes the coagulofibrinolytic system abnormalities associated with sepsis and discusses related management strategies. It also explores the reasons why DIC is perceived differently in different regions. There is a major discrepancy between diagnostic and treatment options in Japan, which are based on holistic assessments of trials, as well as the results of post hoc subgroup analyses and observational studies, and those in Western countries, which are based mainly on the results of sepsis mega trials, especially randomized controlled trials. The differences might also be due to various patient factors in each region, especially racial characteristics in thrombolytic mechanisms, and differences in interpretation of evidence for candidate drugs. Hence, Japanese researchers need to distribute their high-quality clinical research data not only to Japan but also to the rest of the world.

Differential Diagnosis Distinguishing Immune TTP from Septic DIC Using Plasma Levels of Haptoglobin and Factor XIII Activity

Introduction Differential diagnosis of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) and septic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in daily clinical practice is difficult. iTTP is diagnosed by deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity and ADAMTS13 inhibitor positivity. However, it is difficult to rapidly measure ADAMTS13 activity in real-time in clinical practice. Prompt therapeutic interventions are directly dependent on iTTP prognosis. A method for differentiating between these two disorders using common laboratory tests is needed. Plasma haptoglobin levels can indicate hemolysis and are reported to be severely decreased in iTTP. Coagulation factor XIII (FXIII) activity is also severely decreased in septic DIC. To date, no reports have observed haptoglobin in septic DIC or FXIII activity in iTTP. We analyzed the plasma levels of haptoglobin and FXIII activity in patients with iTTP and septic DIC to investigate whether these markers can be used for differential diagnosis. Methods iTTP was defined as <10% normal ADAMTS13 activity, and >0.5 BU/mL ADAMTS13 inhibitor. Septic DIC was defined as meeting both Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock, and ISTH DIC diagnostic criteria. Thirty-five patients with iTTP and 30 with septic DIC were enrolled in this study. Plasma haptoglobin levels were measured using Human Quantikine ELISA Kits (#DPHAGO, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, USA), which is a highly sensitive method compared to methods used in clinical practice. Values are expressed as medians (first quartile-third quartile). Results As shown in the table, iTTP patients were significantly younger than those with septic DIC. The iTTP group showed significantly lower ADAMTS13 activity, higher ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer, lower hemoglobin level, lower platelet counts, higher LDH level, and lower creatinine level than the septic DIC group. In a comparison of coagulation and fibrinolytic markers, the septic DIC group had significantly higher PT-INR, prolonged APTT, higher FDP and D-dimer levels, and lower AT activity than the iTTP group. The plasma haptoglobin level was 0.39 mg/dL (0.18-0.76 mg/dL) in the iTTP group, and 54.2 mg/dL (0.6-143.9 mg/dL) in the septic DIC group (P < 0.01). FXIII activity was 91.3% (80.4-115.0%) in the iTTP group, and 36.3% (14.7-61.9%) in the septic DIC group (p<0.01). The ROC curve of haptoglobin and FXIII activity in the differential diagnosis of TTP and septic DIC were investigated. The cut-off level of haptoglobin was 2.868 mg/dL, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.832 (95% CI:0.727-0.938), specificity was 66.7%, and sensitivity was 100%. The cutoff level of FXIII activity was 76.0%, AUC was 0.931 (95%CI:0.873-0.989), specificity was 77.1%, and sensitivity was 93.3%. We developed a scoring system to differentiate iTTP from septic DIC using a combination of FXIII activity and haptoglobin; TTP/DIC index = plasma FXIII activity (%) - plasma haptoglobin (mg/dL). Laboratory TTP was defined when the index was ≥60, and laboratory DIC was defined when the index was <60. The AUC for the combination of FXIII activity and haptoglobin was 0.968 (95% CI: 0.9354-1). The accuracy of iTTP diagnosis in laboratory TTP was 89.2% (33/37), and the accuracy of septic DIC diagnosis in laboratory DIC was 92.9% (26/28). Conclusions A comparison of iTTP and septic DIC showed significant differences in haptoglobin and FXIII activity levels. A combination of haptoglobin and FXIII activity was considered helpful in differentiating iTTP from septic DIC. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Predicting neonatal mortality with a disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system.

Although disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a critical disease, its mortality in neonates is hard to predict. The aim of this study was to investigate underlying conditions associated with neonatal DIC to see if a scoring system could predict mortality. We retrospectively evaluated the DIC scores of neonates diagnosed on or after the second day of life, in conjunction with underlying conditions associated with DIC. The diagnosis of DIC was made according to Japan Society of Obstetrical, Gynecological & Neonatal Hematology (JSOGNH) 2016 neonatal DIC criteria. Among 23 neonates with DIC, 8 had gastrointestinal perforation with necrotizing enterocolitis and 6 had congenital heart disease. Although factors such as birth weight, gestational age, D-dimer, and fibrinogen were not predictive of mortality, median PT-INR differed significantly between the two groups (survived 1.69 vs died 2.37, P = 0.004). Furthermore, median DIC scores differed significantly by survival outcome (P = 0.013). DIC scores based on JSOGNH 2016 neonatal DIC criteria are predictive of mortality in infants diagnosed with DIC on or after the second day of life.

The Role of Fibrin-Related Markers in Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Due to Sepsis

Sepsis leads to local and systemic activation of different response systems, including coagulation and fibrinolysis. An overwhelming inflammatory response may lead to organ failure, and the coagulation and fibrinolysis involvement may lead to Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC). Special regard is given to the diagnosis of DIC by the use of scoring systems, which are, APACHE II, SAPS II, International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH), and Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW). A large variety of fibrin compounds can be detected in plasma from septic patients with intravascular coagulation activation. Coagulation activation is indicated by elevated plasma levels of D-dimer, prothrombin fragments, and Thrombin-Antithrombin (TAT) complexes. Fibrin-Related Markers (FRMs) identified in sepsis are D-dimer, fibrinogen, Soluble Fibrin Monomer (SFM), and Fibrin Degradation Products (FDP). Hemostatic molecular markers, such as TAT, Plasmin-Plasmin Inhibitor Complex (PPIC), D-dimer, and SFM are better for the diagnosis of pre-DIC. No single biomarker of sepsis may be ideal, but many are helpful in terms of at least identifying critically ill patients who need more careful monitoring. As each biomarker has limited sensitivity and specificity, it may be interesting to combine several biomarkers. The purpose of this literature review was to increase knowledge about laboratory tests of FRMs and provide current knowledge and insight into these biomarkers related to DIC-sepsis. The method used in this literature review was a traditional review. Search, identify, and select relevant literature on PubMed–CBI and Google Scholar based on keywords, 30 journals were obtained from the two search engines.

Clinicopathological features, treatment outcome and survival of 115 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma with bone marrow metastasis and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

e16035 Background: Bone marrow (BM) infiltration is a special subtype of bone metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) and frequently complicated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and other hematological disorders, which constitute a critical but poorly defined clinical syndrome (GBD syndrome). At present, only case reports are available about this peculiar disease. This pooled analysis was to describe its detailed clinicopathological features and treatment outcome. Methods: Cases reported in medical literatures or treated in our hospital from 2000 to 2021 were systemically scrutinized. The inclusion criteria were: adenocarcinoma in gastroesophageal junction or stomach, carcinomatosis in BM, and overt DIC. Detailed clinical and pathological data were reviewed. Based on the chronological order of the diagnosis of GC, BM infiltration and DIC, GBD syndromes could be classified as synchronous and metachronous type. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Fisher's exact tests, and survival analysis were performed as appropriate. Results: 115 cases of GBD syndrome were identified. 91 (79.1%) were synchronous and 24 (20.9%) were metachronous. Female patients were more than half in the study (61, 53.1%). The median age of 51 (9-87) was relatively younger than that of normal GC. ECOG PS 3-4 were present in 67 (58.3%) cases. 109 (94.8%) had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Her-2 overexpression were only seen in 8 (6.9%) cases and none were d-MMR. 88.3% (53 out of 60) cases treated in our hospital showed remarkable CKMB elevation which was not mentioned in previous reports. Abnormal level of LDH and ALP were seen in 91.2% and 64.3% cases. Totally, 82 patients received anticancer therapy. 70 (85.3%) went through the first DIC strike. 5-FU and docetaxel were the most applied agents. Patients treated with BSC only survived 14 days (2-61). After the remission of DIC, patients with synchronous and metachronous BD syndrome achieved 168 and 182 days of overall survival, respectively (p = 0.932). Conclusions: CKMB might be a distinctive marker for GBD syndrome. Active chemotherapy achieved numerous remissions of DIC and a considerable survival. Further translational research and prospective trial are urgently needed.

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Varying Age Groups Based on Clinical Conditions.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a serious syndrome characterized by the systemic activation of blood coagulation resulting in the thrombosis of vessels leading to organ dysfunction and severe bleeding. When physicians try to treat DIC, it is imperative to diagnose and treat the underlying conditions. Anyone can be affected by DIC, but vulnerable groups such as pediatric populations, pregnant women and the elderly may be at higher risk. In this review, the current literature on DIC in pregnancy, the pediatric population, and the elderly is reported. This review also highlights the similarities and differences in the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of DIC in the aforementioned groups (i.e., pediatrics, pregnant women, and the elderly). Findings from this study may help increase awareness about various presentations of DIC in these groups to facilitate rapid recognition of symptoms leading to correct diagnoses.

Diagnosis and treatment of bbstetrics disseminated intravascular coagulation in resource limited settings.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is one of the commonest causes of abnormal bleeding during pregnancy and puerperium. Its successful management is a challenging feat in resource limited settings (RLS). To determine Obstetricians' approach in diagnosing and treating obstetrics DIC in a RLS. A semi-structured pre-tested 4-sectioned questionnaire was used to collect demographic data of Nigerian obstetricians and data on their practice in the diagnosis and treatment of obstetrics DIC. A total of 171 obstetricians responded. Preeclampsia was the most frequent cause identified (70.2%) followed by postpartum haemorrahge (58.3%). Platelet count determination was the test mostly used (95.9%) to make a diagnosis of DIC whereas, antithrombin assay was the least (20.6%) requested investigation. While about two-third would monitor the evolution of DIC, a little less than half of the obstetricians would not repeat laboratory testing more than every 2 days, reason mainly (61.8%) due to patient's financial constraint. Almost three-quarter of them preferred fresh whole blood as the first line of treatment of DIC. DIC remains a challenge in the obstetrics practice in RLS especially in investigations, monitoring and index of suspicion for non-overt DIC.

Proposal of Quick Diagnostic Criteria for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Background. The diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) vary and are complicated and the cut-off values are different. Simple and quick diagnostic criteria for DIC are required in physicians for critical care. Material and methods. Platelet counts, prothrombin time–international normalized ratio (PT-INR) and D-dimer levels were examined in 1293 critical ill patients. Adequate cut-off values of these parameters were determined and a quick DIC score using these biomarkers was proposed. The quick DIC score was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results. Using the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare diagnostic criteria, 70 and 109 patients were diagnosed with DIC and pre-DIC, respectively. The ROC analysis of factors difference between DIC and non-DIC, revealed the following cut-off values: PT-INR, 1.20; platelet count, 12.0 × 1010/L and D-dimer, 10.0 μg/mL. Based on the above results, the quick DIC score system was proposed. All patients with DIC had a quick DIC score of 3, 4 or 5, and 85.3% of the patients with pre-DIC had a quick DIC score of ≥3 points. All patients with pre-DIC had a score of ≥2 points. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.997 for DIC vs. non-DIC, and 0.984 for pre-DIC + DIC vs. non-DIC, and the cut-off value was 3 points for DIC and 2 points for DIC + pre-DIC. The quick DIC scores of non-survivors were significantly higher than those of survivors. Conclusions. The Quick DIC score system is a simple and useful tool that can be used for the diagnosis of DIC and pre-DIC. Further evaluation of the quick DIC score system in a large-scale study is required.

Clinical and pathophysiological aspects of disseminated intravascular coagulation

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a complex process, the course and outcome of which is determined by triggering mechanisms, the reactivity of the body and a number of related conditions. As a result of these interactions, the clinical and laboratory manifestations of DIC vary greatly, making it difficult to diagnose and correct it. With DIC, there are no standard, especially pathognomonic, clinical symptoms, there are no generally accepted laboratory diagnostic criteria, as well as specific therapy. The development of methods for treating DIC and assessing their effectiveness is hampered by the fact that, firstly, the outcome of DIC depends more on its immediate cause than on treatment; secondly, the usually recommended therapeutic effects (heparin therapy, infusion of antithrombin III concentrates, protein C, etc.) have never been the subject of objective randomized follow-up studies, with the exception, perhaps, of the use of antithrombin III drugs [4]. Undoubtedly, advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of DIC directly depend on the depth of understanding of its pathogenetic mechanisms that unfold at the molecular and cellular levels. Modern ideas about the pathogenesis of DIC syndrome are, in one way or another, a development of the idea of ​​continuous intravascular coagulation [5], which under some conditions from latent physiological becomes massive pathological with distinct clinical and laboratory manifestations [1, 2, 7].

DIC in Pregnancy - Pathophysiology, Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Scores, and Treatments.

Obstetrical hemorrhage and especially DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) is a leading cause for maternal mortality across the globe, often secondary to underlying maternal and/or fetal complications including placental abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets), retained stillbirth and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Various obstetrical disorders can present with DIC as a complication; thus, increased awareness is key to diagnosing the condition. DIC patients can present to clinicians who may not be experienced in a variety of aspects of thrombosis and hemostasis. Hence, DIC diagnosis is often only entertained when the patient already developed uncontrollable bleeding or multi-organ failure, all of which represent unsalvageable scenarios. Beyond the clinical presentations, the main issue with DIC diagnosis is in relation to coagulation test abnormalities. It is widely believed that in DIC, patients will have prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT), thrombocytopenia, low fibrinogen, and raised D-dimers. Diagnosis of DIC can be elusive during pregnancy and requires vigilance and knowledge of the physiologic changes during pregnancy. It can be facilitated by using a pregnancy specific DIC score including three components: 1) fibrinogen concentrations; 2) the PT difference – relating to the difference in PT result between the patient’s plasma and the laboratory control; and 3) platelet count. At a cutoff of ≥26 points, the pregnancy specific DIC score has 88% sensitivity, 96% specificity, a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 22, and a negative LR of 0.125. Management of DIC during pregnancy requires a prompt attention to the underlying condition leading to this complication, including the delivery of the patient, and correction of the hemostatic problem that can be guided by point of care testing adjusted for pregnancy.

The Relationship Between D-dimer and Prognosis in the Patients with Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein-Positive Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background:Alpha-fetoprotein-positive gastric cancer (AFPGC) is a subtype of gastric cancer that is rare in clinical practice and extremely malignant. Malignant tumors are often associated with hemorrhage, thrombosis, and even disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The D-dimer test is used as a sensitive index in the diagnosis of DIC and fresh thrombosis in malignant tumors. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between D-dimer values and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with serum AFPGC (AFP ⩾ 15 μg/L) patients.Methods:Overall, 120 healthy subjects and 120 AFP-negative gastric cancer (AFP < 15μg/L) patients from May 2017 to July 2018 at the Shanxi Cancer Hospital served as the control group in this retrospective cohort study. Additionally, 120 patients with pretreatment advanced serum AFP were chosen to analyze clinicopathologic features and factors that affect prognosis. The predictor was the D-dimer, and the outcome variable was overall survival (OS). Other variables included age, sex, tumor site, T-stage, distant metastasis, and preoperative serum tumor biomarkers. Differences in OS rate were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 9.2.0.332. The Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis.Results:In comparison to AFP-negative gastric cancer, we discovered that D-dimer had a meaningfully higher presentation in patients with AFPGC (P < .001). Based on D-dimer median levels, the AFPGC patients were divided into two groups, including 39 patients with low D-dimer (<1000 ng/mL) and 81 patients with high D-dimer (⩾1000 ng/mL). The variables, including T-stage, distant metastasis, and expression of HER2, were associated with the value of D-dimer. The D-dimer levels were weakly related to the levels of tumor markers. The differences in AFPGC patients, with an OS rate of 30.76% for patients with low D-dimer (<1000) and 12.30% with high D-dimer (⩾1000; P = .0027), were statistically significant. Cox multivariate analysis of various parameters indicated that T-stage, distant metastasis, vascular embolism, level of D-dimer, and tumor biomarkers of AFP were independent risk factors for survival.Conclusion:Serum D-dimer levels may be a valuable indicator for predicting AFPGC metastasis and progression.

Evaluation of the International Society on Thrombosis & Haemostasis scoring system & its modifications in diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A pilot study from southern India.

Diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) rests primarily on the clinical profile along with supportive laboratory tests. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) had proposed a scoring system for the diagnosis of overt DIC. However, fibrinogen values which are supposed to be low are often found to be elevated due to the associated inflammation seen in some cases. Moreover, peripheral smear is known to show schistocytes, which is also not included in the score. This study was done to evaluate ISTH scoring system and its modifications in suspected DIC. Fifty-six patients were enrolled for the present study of whom; in four, fibrinogen assay could not be done. Modifications in the ISTH scoring with the exclusion of fibrinogen, i.e. modified ISTH (MI) score and subsequent inclusion of schistocytes, i.e. modified ISTH with schistocytes (MIS) score, were used. The modified scores were analyzed for diagnostic accuracy parameters and agreement with ISTH score. Amongst 56 cases, 9/52 (17.3%), 22 (39.3%) and 17 (30.4%) were diagnosed as positive for overt DIC by ISTH, MI and MIS scores and mortality was 33, 22.7 and 17.6 per cent, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the MI score were 100, 74.4, 45 and 100 per cent and for MIS score were 100, 86, 60 and 100 per cent, respectively. The agreement between MI score and MIS score with ISTH score was moderate [κ=0.502, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.272-0.732, P<0.001] and substantial (κ=0.681, 95% CI: 0.45-0.91, P<0.001). In the present study, the calculated mortality was highest by ISTH score. Best agreement was between MIS score and ISTH score. In a resource-constrained setup where fibrinogen assay and therefore ISTH score is difficult, it is suggested that MIS score can be considered.