Diagnosis Of Diaphragmatic Paralysis Research Articles

Diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis by ultrasound after cardiac surgery

Diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis by ultrasound after cardiac surgery

Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: Current approach and perspectives.

This article reports the various methods used to assess diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography. The excursions of the two hemidiaphragms can be measured using two-dimensional or M-mode ultrasonography, during respiratory maneuvers such as quiet breathing, voluntary sniffing and deep inspiration. On the zone of apposition to the rib cage for both hemidiaphragms, it is possible to measure the thickness on expiration and during deep breathing to assess the percentage of thickening during inspiration. These two approaches make it possible to assess the quality of the diaphragmatic function and the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis or dysfunction. These methods are particularly useful in circumstances where there is a high risk of phrenic nerve injury or in diseases affecting the contractility or the motion of the diaphragm such as neuro-muscular diseases. Recent methods such as speckle tracking imaging and ultrasound shear wave elastography should provide more detailed information for better assessment of diaphragmatic function.

Explorations of Unilateral Diaphragmatic Paralysis

Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate sniff test, maximal inspiratory pressure, and presence of paradoxical inspiratory diaphragmatic movements and their diagnostic value in patients referred for suspicion of diaphragmatic dysfunction.Methods. Twenty-two patients (8 men and 14 women,58±13years) with suspected diaphragmatic dysfunction were included. Pulmonary function test was evaluated by spirometry. Diaphragm dysfunction was diagnosed with unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation. Esophageal pressure was recorded during sniff test and maximal static inspiratory movements. Detection of paradoxical diaphragmatic movement was performed with anteroposterior projection of chest X-ray fluoroscopic video.Results.Phrenic nerve stimulationenabled diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis in 15 of the 22 patients. The remaining 7 patients had normal explorations. Lung volumes were significantly lower in patients with diaphragmatic paralysis than in control subjects, as maximal inspiratory pressure. No patient with normal diaphragmatic exploration had paradoxical inspiratory movement. The combined diagnostic value of reduced esophageal pressure during sniff test, reduced esophageal pressure during maximal static inspiratory movements, and presence of paradoxical inspiratory movement had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 71%.Conclusion. Our results suggest that, in most cases, a combination of sniff test, maximal inspiratory pressure, and paradoxical inspiratory movement could help to diagnose diaphragmatic dysfunction. Nevertheless, phrenic nerve stimulation remains the best test for assessing diaphragmatic dysfunction.

Diaphragmatic paralysis following blunt neck trauma

A 25-year-old construction worker presented to the emergency department (ED) after the accidental fall of a metal bar on his neck. In the field, he was appropriately managed with a cervical collar for possible spine injury. On arrival at the ED, he was fully conscious with severe neck pain, hypotensive 80/50 mmHg and bradycardiac 48 beats/min. Physical examination revealed a flaccid paralysis and sensory loss in all four extremities. A chest X-ray study was unremarkable (Fig. 1, panel a). Two hours later, after examination revealed absent air entry over the right lung base, a repeat X-ray study showed an elevated right hemidiaphragm and an ipsilateral mediastinal shift (Fig. 1 panel b). Computed tomography (CT scan) of the neck showed a comminuted, posteriorly displaced fracture of the third cervical vertebrae (Fig. 1, panel c and d). In view of the established quadriplegia and neurogenic shock, this X-ray finding is suggestive of unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. The delayed onset of diaphragmatic paralysis probably coincides with the evolving post-traumatic spinal cord edema. A few hours later, he developed respiratory distress with evident abdominal wall retraction during inspiration and protrusion during expiration in addition to hypoxia, hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis on blood gas analysis. The trachea was intubated and mechanical ventilation was started. This worsening respiratory status was concerning for the progression into bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. Throughout the ICU course, his neurological status failed to improve requiring continued mechanical ventilation and subsequent tracheostomy. He was transferred to a subacute rehabilitation facility for further care. The diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis is suggested clinically by the presence of abdominal wall retraction during inspiration and protrusion during expiration. Whereas unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis is usually well tolerated in the absence of underlying lung pathology, bilateral paralysis requires long-term ventilatory support. In contrast to bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, a chest X-ray study is more specific for diagnosing a unilateral paralysis. Fluoroscopy confirms the diagnosis when paradoxical inspiratory elevation of the paralyzed hemidiaphragm is evident.

Diaphragmatic Nerve Palsy After Cardiac Surgery in Children in Egypt

Diaphragmatic paralysis (DP) due to phrenic nerve injury is a complication which occurs in association with congenital cardiac surgery and may be a life-threatening event in infants and young children. Information about this complication is still scarce from the developing countries. Retrospective study evaluated the incidence of DP among 414 patients who underwent congenital cardiac surgery in Abo Elriesh Children's Specialized Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt, in the duration from April 2009 to December 2011. Incidence of DP was 3.6% (15 of 414 cases). Median age of affected patients was 10 months (ranged from 1 month to 13 years). Diagnosis of DP was observed after ventricular septal defect repair (3.9%), Glenn anastomosis (8.6%), Tetralogy of Fallot repair (4.3%), Senning operation (10%), arterial switch operation (3.2%), Fontan procedure (33%), coarctation of the aorta repair (7%), and pulmonary artery banding (6.4%). Diaphragmatic plication was performed in 4 of 15 cases. Patients with DP had significantly prolonged mechanical ventilation duration as compared to unaffected patients (median 120, range 48-600 vs 4, range 0-48 hours, P < .000). They also had a higher incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in 8 of 15 (53%) cases, longer duration of intensive care unit stay (median 15, range 4-62 days, P < .006), and significant mortality in 7 of 15 (46%; P < .004). Mortality among patients who underwent diaphragm plication was 1 of 4 (25%). Diaphragmatic paralysis is a relatively rare complication of congenital cardiac surgery in children. Its occurrence is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A high index of clinical suspicion, utilization of bedside diagnostic tools, and a policy of early plication for certain patients may lead to improved outcomes.

Diaphragmatic Hernia of the Right Hepatic Lobe Mistaken for Diaphragmatic Paralysis in Adult

Diaphragmatic paralysis can be demonstrated through diaphragmatic elevation on chest X-ray after thoracic lung surgery or the placement of chest tubing. Additional causes of diaphragmatic paralysis are iatrogenic, mass, atelectasis, etc. For the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis, it required some studies (fluoroscopy, computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging). Diaphragmatic hernia of the liver is a rare clinical entity, usually found after trauma in adults. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates requires surgery. Non-traumatic diaphragmatic hernia of the liver in an adult is a rare right-sided diaphragmatic hernia. On developing any symptoms, surgery must be performed. When diaphragmatic hernia is incidentally found in adults without trauma, it is placed under observation for a time period. We diagnosed the diaphragmatic herniation of a right hepatic lobe by 16-slice CT scan without surgery.

Paralysies diaphragmatiques après ponction jugulaire interne

Two cases of paralysis of the diaphragm occurring after puncture of the internal jugular vein are reported. Both were old cancer patients, requiring an internal jugular venous catheter for intravenous feeding. Although the catheter was easily placed in both cases, the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis was made postoperatively. The first patient remained asymptomatic, despite paradoxical breathing when lying supine ; there was no change in her condition up to her death 4 months later. The second patient became increasingly breathless, with hypoxia and hypercapnia, during recovery from a gastrostomy under general anaesthesia. She required artificial ventilation, from which she could not be weaned and died 25 days later. A lesion of the phrenic nerve is possible when placing an internal jugular venous catheter, because they are closely related behind the sternocleidomastoid muscle. In the opposite to compression by a haematoma, or transient blockade following local anaesthetic infiltration, such a direct injury may be irreversible.

Ultrasound in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis after operation for congenital heart disease.

Phrenic nerve palsy is a recognised complication of operation for congenital heart disease in children. The accuracy of ultrasound in assessing diaphragmatic motion was prospectively compared with fluoroscopy in 16 patients in whom phrenic nerve palsy was suspected. Ultrasound successfully identified the five patients with phrenic nerve palsy; there were no false positive or false negative diagnoses. Ultrasound was as effective as fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of abnormalities of diaphragmatic motion.

Diaphragmatic weakness and paralysis

Diaphragmatic weakness implies a decrease in the strength of the diaphragm. Diaphragmatic paralysis is an extreme form of diaphragmatic weakness. Diaphragmatic paralysis is an uncommon clinical problem while diaphragmatic weakness, although uncommon, is probably frequently unrecognized because appropriate tests to detect its presence are not performed. Weakness of the diaphragm can result from abnormalities at any site along its neuromuscular axis, although it most frequently arises from diseases in the phrenic nerves or from myopathies affecting the diaphragm itself. Presence of diaphragmatic weakness may be suspected from the complaint of dyspnea (particularly on exertion) or orthopnea; the presence of rapid, shallow breathing or, more importantly, paradoxical inward motion of the abdomen during inspiration on physical examination; a restrictive pattern on lung function testing; an elevated hemidiaphragm on chest radiograph; paradoxical upward movement of 1 hemidiaphragm during fluoroscopic imaging; or reductions in maximal static inspiratory pressure. The diagnosis of diaphragmatic weakness is confirmed, however, by a reduction in maximal static transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdimax). The diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis is confirmed by the absence of a compound diaphragm action potential on phrenic nerve stimulation. There are many causes of diaphragmatic weakness and paralysis. In this review we outline an approach we have found useful in attempting to determine a specific cause. Most frequently the cause is either a phrenic neuropathy or diaphragmatic myopathy. Often the neuropathy or myopathy affects other nerves or muscles that can be more easily investigated to determine the specific pathologic basis, and, by association, it is presumed that the diaphragmatic weakness or paralysis is secondary to the same disease process.

Aggressive Treatment of Acquired Phrenic Nerve Paralysis in Infants and Small Children

Transthoracic diaphragmatic plication is a simple and effective means of treatment for phrenic nerve injury and resultant diaphragmatic paralysis, and should be undertaken as soon as the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis is established in a child with substantial respiratory difficulty. Seven of more than 1,500 patients sustained phrenic nerve injury during operation for congenital heart disease at our institution over the past five years. All but 1 patient were less than 5 months old, and the average weight was 3.8 kg. Five of the 7 could not be weaned from the ventilator, and the other 2 had persistent postoperative tachypnea and stridor. Before 1980, 3 patients were intubated for an average of 16 days prior to diagnosis by fluoroscopy. Since then, 4 patients have been intubated for an average of 7.8 days before diagnosis. All 7 underwent transthoracic diaphragmatic plication and were extubated by 6 days after operation (mean, 3.7 days). Six patients survived and are doing well. The 1 death occurred in 1976 in a premature infant with multiple congenital cardiac lesions; diagnosis was delayed until the twenty-eighth day after intubation and transthoracic diaphragmatic plication, until the sixty-second day. This infant died of pneumonia one month after extubation. These data support our policy of establishing an early diagnosis of phrenic nerve injury and early treatment utilizing transthoracic diaphragmatic plication in symptomatic children.

Diaphragm movements and the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis

The author shows that unequal excursion of the two leaves of the diaphragm is a normal finding. Left dominance is twice as common as right dominance and the mean left excursion is greater than the mean right excursion. This inequality is obvious without measurement in one out of six normal subjects. Unilateral paradoxical movement on sniffing occurs in 6% of normal subjects and the sniff test is unreliable unless suitably qualified or supported. The chances of a normal subject showing diminished excursion plus a paradoxical sniff test on the same side, are 2% on the right side and 0.12% on the left side.