Diagnosis Of Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection Research Articles

Adding vortexing to the Maki technique provides no benefit for the diagnosis of catheter colonization or catheter-related bacteremia.

A previous study compared vortexing and Maki techniques for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and concluded that vortexing was not superior to Maki method. To determine whether the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques provides profitability versus the Maki technique for the diagnosis of catheter tip colonization (CTC) and CRBSI. Observational and prospective study carried out in an Intensive Care Unit. Patients with suspected catheter-related infection (CRI) and with one central venous catheter for at least 7 days were included. The area under the curve (AUC) of the Maki technique, the vortexing technique and the combination of both techniques for the diagnosis of CTC and CRBSI were compared. We included 136 episodes of suspected CRI. We found 21 cases of CTC of which 10 were also CRBSI cases. Of the 21 CTC episodes, 18 (85.7%) were diagnosed by Maki technique and vortexing technique, 3 (14.3%) only by the technique of Maki, and none only by technique of vortexing. Of the 10 CRBSI episodes, 9 (90.0%) were diagnosed by the techniques of Maki and vortexing, 1 (10.0%) was diagnosed only by the technique of Maki, and none only by the technique of vortexing. We no found differences in the comparison of AUC between the technique of Maki and the combination of Maki and vortexing techniques for the diagnosis of CTC (P = 0.99) and CRBSI (P = 0.99). The novel finding of our study was that the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques did not provide profitability to the technique of Maki alone to CRBSI diagnosis of.

The Effect of Residence Time of No-tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters on Infection and Thrombosis Outcome. Identification of CVC’s Time Cut-off

Introduction: Permanent vascular access (arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG)) is susceptible to acute events that reduce patency. The temporary central venous catheter (CVC) constitutes bridging therapy for primary vascular access dysfunction. The impact of “residence time” on the rate of dysfunction/thrombosis or infection remains to be explored. AIM: 1) To evaluate the impact of CVC residence time on outcomes (infection or Thrombosis/dysfunction) in consecutive temporary CVCs adjusted for the insertion site (upper site vs. lower site). 2) To establish a cut-off resident time. Patients and methods: Seventeen prevalent hemodialysis patients with three consecutive CVCs are followed up prospectively in an observational study for a period equivalent to the permanence of the CVCs. The data is recorded at the beginning of the CVC time. The diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection and thrombosis/dysfunction is made following the K-Doqi 2019 guidelines. Statistical analysis: Seventeen hemodialysis patients (51 CVCs) were included. The ‘CVC resident time’ of each individual patient ((i.e. βcoefficient (log-transformed)*AUC)) was determined using LMM and then inserted into multivariate Cox models to assess infection and dysfunction/thrombosis outcomes (Joint Models). The AUC was calculated at various baseline levels of CVC time (10th……50th percentile). The cut-off point for thrombosis in CVC time corresponds to the mean of the CVC time at the 30th percentile of all CVCs. Results: The CVC time is different for CVC’s site insertion and sequence. From the analysis of multivariate joint models, CVC resident time appears not to be significant for infection, but heterogenicity for the insertion site (ref3-4=upper site) is significant for the outcome of thrombosis/dysfunction. From the study of survival analysis, the free survival from outcomes by CVC site insertion appears to be significant for thrombosis/dysfunction. The average time of CVCs’ calculation at the 30th percentile is 14 days (cut-off). Conclusion: No tunneled hemodialysis Catheter (NTHC) residence time is considered not to be a risk factor for infection, but it represents a risk factor for lower access thrombosis. After the cut-off time of 14 days, the advantage of the higher NTHCs is lost.

Cost-effectiveness of taurolidine-citrate in a cohort of patients with intestinal failure receiving home parenteral nutrition.

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for chronic intestinal failure (CIF) are associated with significant morbidity and financial costs. Taurolidine is associated with a reduction in bloodstream infections, with limited information on the cost-effectiveness as the primary prevention. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of using taurolidine-citrate for the primary prevention of CRBSIs within a quaternary hospital. All patients with CIF receiving HPN were identified between January 2015 and November 2022. Data were retrospectively collected regarding patient demographics, HPN use, CRBSI diagnosis, and use of taurolidine-citrate. The direct costs associated with CRBSI-associated admissions and taurolidine-citrate use were obtained from the coding department using a bottom-up approach. An incremental cost-effective analysis was performed, with a time horizon of 4 years, to compare the costs associated with primary and secondary prevention against the outcome of cost per infection avoided. Forty-four patients received HPN within this period. The CRBSI rates were 3.25 infections per 1000 catheter days before the use of taurolidine-citrate and 0.35 infections per 1000 catheter days after taurolidine-citrate use. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio indicates primary prevention is the weakly dominant intervention, with the base case value of $27.04 per CRBSI avoided. This held with one-way sensitivity analysis. Taurolidine-citrate in the primary prevention of CRBSIs in patients with CIF receiving HPN is associated with reduced hospital costs and infection rates.

Understanding the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection: real-time monitoring of biofilm growth dynamics using time-lapse optical microscopy.

The differential time to positivity (DTTP) technique is recommended for the conservative diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI). The technique is based on a 120-minute difference between microbial growth in blood drawn through the catheter and blood drawn through a peripheral vein. However, this cut-off has failed to confirm C-RBSI caused by Candida spp. and Staphylococcus aureus. We hypothesized that the biofilm of both microorganisms disperses faster than that of other microorganisms and that microbial load is rapidly equalized between catheter and peripheral blood. Therefore, our aim was to compare the biofilm dynamics of various microorganisms. Biofilm of ATCC strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans was grown on silicon disks and analyzed using time-lapse optical microscopy. The time-lapse images of biofilms were processed using ImageJ2 software. Cell dispersal time and biofilm thickness were calculated. The mean (standard deviation) dispersal time in C. albicans and S. aureus biofilms was at least nearly 3 hours lower than in biofilm of S. epidermidis, and at least 15 minutes than in E. faecalis and E. coli biofilms. Our findings could explain why early dissemination of cells in C. albicans and S. aureus prevents us from confirming or ruling out the catheter as the source of the bloodstream infection using the cut-off of 120 minutes in the DTTP technique. In addition, DTTP may not be sufficiently reliable for E. coli since their dispersion time is less than the cut-off of 120 minutes.

Ultrasonographic Findings of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Patients.

Catheter removal is essential for treating catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI); however, clinicians are sometimes hesitant to remove catheters in pediatric patients due to the difficulty of securing vascular access. Confirming the diagnosis of CRBSI is important to justify catheter removal. The purpose of this study was to describe the sonographic findings of CRBSI. We included patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) or peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) who had a positive blood culture and underwent ultrasound. The patients were classified as with or without CRBSI. Sonographic findings, such as the presence/absence of thrombus, venous wall thickening, hyperechogenicity, and fluid collection around the vein were compared using Fisher's exact test. Of the 58 patients, 38 (66%) were diagnosed with CRBSI. The presence of thrombus (19/38 vs 3/20, P = .011); and hyperechogenicity around the vein (14/38 vs 2/20, P = .035) differed significantly, but There was no significant difference in the presence of venous wall thickening (10/38 vs 1/20, P = .077), and fluid collection around the vein (5/38 vs 0/20, P = .153), did not differ significantly in patients with and without CRBSI, respectively. One-third of patients with CRBSI, including 11 (42.3%) patients with CVC, and 2 (16.7%) patients with PICC, did not have abnormal sonographic findings. Ultrasound findings are useful for diagnosing CRBSI. However, the sensitivity of sonographic findings is low and abnormal sonographic findings are sometimes absent in children with CRBSI; therefore, physicians should not rule out CRBSI based on normal sonographic findings, especially in patients a CVC and a positive blood culture.

#6728 ALCOHOL LOCK FOR PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST PERMCATH CRBSI: IS IT A BOON?

Abstract Background and Aims Introduction: Catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) is a dreaded complication in patients with tunneled dialysis catheter and often results in catheter loss. Antibiotic lock, a preventive strategy, is not followed for fear of emergence of resistant strains. We have reported usefulness of 70% alcohol lock in cases of established CRBSI. The present study was aimed to find usefulness of alcohol lock for CRBSI prophylaxis. Method This is a single centre observational pilot study. Dialysis patients with Permcath as vascular access were randomised into two groups. Both groups were similar in age, sex and comorbidities. Both groups received routine heparin lock after each dialysis session. Group A in addition also received 70% alcohol lock, once a fortnight. Patients with minimum follow up of 60 days were included in the study. Diagnosis of CRBSI was made by IDSA criteria. Results Forty five patients with permcath were divided in Group A (29 patients) and Group B (16 patients). In Group A, 21 and in Group B, 12 patients completed the study. In Group A, during a mean follow up of 2988 catheter days, 5 patients (23%,1/600 days) developed CRBSI (2 pseudomonas, two staphylococcus aureus and 1 Klebsiella) and in group B, 4 patients (33%) with mean follow up of 1611 catheter days (1 in 403 catheter days) developed CRBSI (p = 0.69) (2 klebsiella, two staphylococcus). There was no case of catheter leak, crack or block in either group. Results showed a trend towards better outcome in alcohol lock group though because of small number, statistical significance couldn't be reached. Conclusion This pilot study found usefulness of alcohol lock in preventing CRBSI. Alcohol lock is cheap and there was no apparent catheter damage with alcohol over 6 months period. A larger study can confirm our findings.

Usefulness of differential time to positivity between catheter and peripheral blood cultures for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infection: Data analysis from routine clinical practice in the intensive care unit

PurposeTo assess the accuracy of differential time to positivity (DTP) method for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in the routine practice of our intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and methodsOver a five-year study period, ICU patients with a central venous catheter in place for ≥48 h and undergoing DTP test with catheter tip culture were analyzed. We investigated: the accuracy of DTP test with the usual threshold of 120 min in confirming the clinical suspicion of CRBSI; the most accurate threshold value of DTP to detect CRBSI; the diagnostic accuracy of the ratio (rather than the difference) between times to positivity. ResultsAmong 278 episodes of paired blood cultures, 13% were CRBSIs. DTP value ≥120 min used for the diagnosis of CRBSI yielded 41% sensitivity and 74% specificity. Performance of DTP values in predicting CRBSI was low (AUC = 0.60 [95%CI: 0.48–0.72]). Cutoff value of the ratio between times to positivity was 0.80, with 46% sensitivity and 79% specificity. ConclusionsThe routine use of the DTP method at any cutoff point has inadequate accuracy in detecting CRBSI in the real every day clinical practice. Not even the ratio between times to positivity seems to be clinically useful.

The comparative accuracy of pooled vs. individual blood culture sampling methods for diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection

BackgroundCatheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost of treatment in critically ill patients. A differential time to positivity (DTP) of 120 min or more between blood cultures obtained through the catheter vs. peripheral vein is an indicator of CRBSI with high sensitivity and specificity. However, it is no clear whether pooled sampling would be as efficient as individual sampling in order to reduce costs, contamination, or anemia.MethodsThis was a prospective diagnostic study conducted at the medical ICU and semi-ICU of Khon Kaen University’s Srinagarind Hospital in Thailand from May 2020 to November 2021. Fifty patients with triple-lumen central venous catheters (CVCs) who were clinically suspected of CRBSI were enrolled. 15 mL of blood was drawn through each catheter lumen, 10 mL of which was inoculated into three blood culture bottles, and the remaining 5 mL was pooled into a single bottle. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and time to positivity of the pooled blood cultures were calculated using individual blood cultures as a reference.ResultsOf the 50 patients enrolled, 14 (28%) were diagnosed with CRBSI, 57.9% of whom were infected with gram-negative bacteria as the causative pathogen (57.9%). Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism. Sensitivity and specificity of the pooled blood sampling method were 69.23% (95% CI [0.44–0.94]) and 97.3% (95% CI [0.92–1.02]), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.83 (95% CI [0.68–0.99]). A paired T-Test to compare time to positivity of the pooled blood bottle and the first positive culture from the individual bottles indicated statistical significance (14.9 and 12.4 h, respectively). The mean difference was 2.5 [0.9–4.1] h, with a 95% CI and a p-value of 0.006.ConclusionPooled blood sampling results in a lower sensitivity and longer time to positivity for CRBSI diagnosis in patients with triple-lumen CVCs than individual lumen sampling.Trial registration Retrospectively registered at Thai Clinical Trials Registry. The study was reviewed and approved on 08/03/2022. TCTR identification number is TCTR20220308002

Blood-culture ordering practices in patients with a central line at an academic medical center–Iowa, 2020

Background: The IDSA has a clinical definition for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) that requires ≥1 set of blood cultures from the catheter and ≥1 set from a peripheral vein. However, because blood cultures obtained from a central line may represent contamination rather than true infection, many institutions discourage blood cultures from central lines. We describe blood culture ordering practices in patients with a central line. Methods: The University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics is an academic medical center with 860 hospital beds. We retrospectively collected data for blood cultures obtained from adult patients (aged ≥18 years) in the emergency department or an inpatient unit during 2020. We focused on the first blood cultures obtained during each admission because they are usually obtained before antibiotic initiation and are the most important opportunity to diagnose bacteremia. We classified blood-culture orders as follows: CRBSI workup, non-CRBSI sepsis workup, or incomplete workup. We defined CRBSI workup as ≥1 blood culture from a central line and ≥1 peripheral blood culture (IDSA guidelines). We defined non-CRBSI sepsis workup as ≥2 peripheral blood cultures without cultures from a central line because providers might have suspected secondary bacteremia rather than CRBSI. We defined incomplete workup as any order that did not meet the CRBSI or non-CRBSI sepsis workup. This occurred when only 1 peripheral culture was obtained or when ≥1 central-line culture was obtained without peripheral cultures. Results: We included 1,150 patient admissions with 4,071 blood cultures. In total, 349 patient admissions with blood culture orders (30.4%) met CRBSI workup. 62.8% were deemed non-CRBSI sepsis workup, and 6.9% were deemed an incomplete workup. Stratified by location, ICUs had the highest percentage of orders with incomplete workups (8.8%), followed by wards (7.2%) and the emergency department (5.1%). In total, 204 patient admissions had ≥1 positive blood culture (17.7%). The most frequently isolated organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 33, 16.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 16, 7.8%), and Escherichia coli (n = 15, 7.4%) Conclusions: Analysis of blood culture data allowed us to identify units at our institute that were underperforming in terms of ordering the necessary blood cultures to diagnose CRBSI. Being familiar with CRBSI guidelines as well as decreasing inappropriate ordering will help lead to early and proper diagnosis of CRBSI which can reduce its morbidity, mortality, and cost.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Diagnostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Response Index for Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis.

Objective This study was aimed at investigating the diagnostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Methods A total of 296 patients undergoing haemodialysis with vascular access were selected and divided into the infected (58 patients) and uninfected (238 patients) groups. Their aetiological and general characteristics were retrospectively collected. The NLR, PLR, CAR, and SIRI were calculated. Results The NLR, PLR, CAR, and SIRI values in the infected group were significantly higher than those in the uninfected group (P < 0.05). After the anti-infective treatment, the NLR, PLR, CAR, and SIRI values in patients with CRBSI were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The NLR, CAR, and SIRI showed diagnostic efficacy in patients with CRBSI with cut-off values of 4.485 (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.827, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.768–0.887), 0.975 (AUC = 0.836, 95%CI = 0.779–0.892), and 3.390 (AUC = 0.947, 95%CI = 0.919–0.976). The CAR and SIRI values in patients with gram-negative bacterial infection were significantly higher than those with gram-positive bacterial infection (P < 0.05). The AUCs of CAR and SIRI were 0.693 (0.537–0.848) and 0.821 (0.700–0.942) in differentiating gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial infections, respectively. Conclusion Our results showed SIRI as a novel and efficient indicator for the early diagnosis of CRBSI in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Sonication did not provide reliability to Maki technique for catheter related bloodstream infection diagnosis.

ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to analyze sonication and Maki techniques for diagnosis of catheter tip colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) on patients admitted to ICU.Material and methodsObservational and prospective study in one Intensive Care Unit. Patients with some central venous catheter (CVC) at least for 7 days and catheter-related infection (CRI) suspicion (new episode of fever or sepsis) were included. We performed Maki technique followed by sonication of catheter tip. We compared area under the curve (AUC) of Maki, sonication, and techniques combination to diagnosis catheter tip colonization and CRBSI.ResultsWe included 94 CVC from 87 CRI suspicion episodes. We found 14 cases of catheter tip colonization and 10 cases of CRBSI. Of the 14 catheter tip colonization cases, 7 (50.0%) were detected by Maki and sonication techniques, 6 (42.9%) were detected only by Maki technique, and 1 (7.1%) was detected only by sonication technique. Of the 10 CRBSI, 6 (60.0%) were detected by Maki and sonication techniques, 4 (40.0%) were detected only by Maki technique, and any only by sonication technique. We found higher AUC in Maki technique than in sonication technique to diagnosis of CRBSI (p=0.02) and to diagnosis of catheter tip colonization (p=0.03). No significant differences were found in AUC between Maki technique and combination techniques for diagnosis of catheter tip colonization (p=0.32) and of CRBSI (p=0.32).Conclusion.:Sonication did not provide reliability to Maki technique for diagnosis of catheter tip colonization and CRBSI.

Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy as alternative methods of early identification of pathogens causing catheter-related bloodstream infections of patients in ICU

Abstract Introduction Vascular catheters are an indispensable element of the therapy of patients in intensive care. Their use is associated with the possibility of complications, including infectious. According to various sources, the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) ranges from 0.1 to 22.7 per 1,000 catheter days. Materials and Methods The central venous catheter tip culture samples were collected from 24 patients with suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection, from three intensive care units (ICUs). The results of microscopic examinations: atomic force microscope (AFM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were compared with the results of microbiological analysis of the central venous catheter tip and blood collected from the catheter. Results The microscopic examination and microbiological analysis of both the blood and central venous catheter samples confirmed the presence of microorganisms in 16 cases (double positive result). Our study was conducted in a short period of time (up to 6 hours) and it gave an initial answer to the question about the type of microorganisms colonising the central venous catheter. In one patient the infection was not caused by removal of the central venous catheter. However, not all results were fully consistent within the two diagnostic methods. The colonisation of the central venous catheter with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis was microbiologically confirmed, but it was not confirmed by the microscopic examination of the sample collected from patient No. 20. However, the examination enabled preliminary assessment of the microorganism colonising the catheter, which may have caused the blood infection. It cannot be ruled out that Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacilli were grown on the catheter that came into contact with blood from another source of infection, e.g. the respiratory, nervous or urinary systems. Information on the presence of cocci-shaped bacteria forming characteristic clusters or rods may enable initial diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection if it is accompanied by typical clinical symptoms. Alternative diagnostics also provides valuable information on the presence of biofilm, which is a factor hindering the body’s response to infection and penetration of antibiotics. Conclusions Our pilot study presents new diagnostic possibilities of microscopic imaging with the atomic force microscope (AFM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to identify pathogens on routinely used disposable medical devices, such as the central venous catheter. On the other hand, this range of diagnostics reveals the potential to constantly improve medical materials which come into direct contact with patients’ tissues. It is important to create a database of microscopic images, which would be a repeatable diagnostic pattern and fully correlated with the results of microbiological analysis, because it would facilitate initial quick diagnosis of a potential CRBSI.

Bedside ultrasound as a screening test for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBI)

PurposeBetween 15 and 30% of all nosocomial bacteremias and sepsis are associated with the use of intravascular devices. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBI) are infections in which the organism identified in the blood is also present on the tip of the catheter itself or in a blood sample taken through it. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of infections related to the use of central catheters.MethodsBetween January 2018 and June 2019, we carried out a prospective study on 36 patients with a central catheter, such as a central venous catheter (CVC), a central catheter with peripheral insertion (PICC), or a fully implanted central venous catheter (PORT-a-cath) and who had signs and symptoms of infection. These patients were submitted to an ultrasound of the catheter upon arrival in the ward in case of suspected infection, or at the time of the onset of signs and symptoms of infection (if these arose during hospitalization). Patients with a central catheter but without signs and symptoms of infection were not included in the study.The end point of the study was to evaluate sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), positive and negative predictive value (PPV-NPV) and overall diagnostic accuracy (ODA) of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CRBI through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsUS showed a SENS of 94%, a SPEC of 84%, a PPV of 84%, an NPV of 94% and an ODA of 88.8% for the diagnosis of CRBI.ConclusionsPreliminary data from our study show that US of intravascular devices has a high SENS and SPEC in the diagnosis of CRBI, and can, therefore, be used as a valid tool to decide whether to remove the device early or leave it in place.

The Actual Epidemiological Effectiveness of Assessing and Improving the System for Ensuring the Epidemiological Safety of Medical Care for Catheterized Patients

The basis of optimized conventional system of surveillance and control for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBI) was priority in detection and risk assessment an infectious complication of puncture catheterization that substantially justified with inclusion of two main components as an addition to the existing system: monitoring of puncture catheterization, which allows to obtain and analyze data on risk factors for infections associated with the catheterization procedure and subsequent manipulations of the device, standardize approaches to working with a venous catheter and improve the diagnosis of CRBI; assessment of ensuring the epidemiological safety of medical care for catheterized patients. Epidemiological efficiency risk-based surveillance, primarily determined to reduce the incidence of CRBI by 1.8 times compared to initially defined real incidence: 12.5‰ (95% CI — CI 11,8–13 2) vs 22.8‰ (95% CI 21,1–24,5) catheterized patients, p=0.0001.

Think Different: Overcoming Challenges to Adopt an Electronic Blood Culture Order That Supports Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Reduction

<h3>Background</h3> Central venous catheters (CVC) are a frequent cause of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections. During root-cause analysis of CLABSI, our team observed positive blood cultures obtained from CVC devices when the peripheral culture result was negative. CVCs are often colonized, increasing the likelihood of a false-positive culture. Our health system is comprised of 9 hospitals and over 4000 practicing physicians supported by one unified electronic medical record (EMR) platform. The current blood culture order did not limit options for site selection, allowing variability and inconsistent performance affecting patient outcomes. <h3>Methods</h3> We reviewed events from June 2018 through October 2019 to determine how many CLABSI were identified based on specimens collected from CVC vs peripherally. We itemized available EMR order selections and identified multidisciplinary stakeholders and frontline providers to influence peers on proposed EMR changes. Infection Prevention proposed modifying the blood culture order to guide the provider to select peripheral source. <h3>Results</h3> 36% of CLABSI were identified from a CVC source with a negative peripheral culture. The current order allowed free selection of options for specimen source in the EMR. It took over 12 months to approve and implement a re-designed blood culture order across a large hospital system. When a provider selects a CVC source for blood culture collection, additional questions are required to complete the order. These include: unable to obtain from peripheral source OR peripheral source positive and suspecting central line infection. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Unanticipated adverse events can be caused by poorly designed systems that allow users multiple choices without consciously considering relevant information. Limited, forced functions guide clinicians to select CVC blood culture only when clinically indicated for diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. System change is successful when a multidisciplinary team led by a physician champion can manage organizational culture to support patient outcomes.

Clinical usefulness of catheter-drawn blood samples and catheter-tip cultures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neonates.

Catheter-drawn blood sampling is an efficient method of diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in neonates; it has greater sensitivity and accuracy than methods using catheter-tip cultures. No association was detected between catheter-drawn blood sampling and the occurrence of adverse events with central venous catheters.

Bacterial Aggregation and Leukocytes Phagocytosing Bacteria in the Diagnosis of Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection

Bacterial Aggregation and Leukocytes Phagocytosing Bacteria in the Diagnosis of Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection

Early diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin levels for catheter-related blood stream infection in first-ever acute ischemic stroke patients

ObjectiveThe traditional approaches for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infection(CRBSI) is time consuming, which could not meet the clinical requirement. Our aim was to investigate the value of serum procalcitonin(PCT) in predicting CRBSI in first-ever acute ischemic stroke patients with central venous catheters (CVCs).MethodsThis was a retrospective study. First-ever acute ischemic stroke patients hospitalized in neurological intensive care unit(NICU) of Aerospace Center Hospital and NICU of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital during January 2010 and December 2017 with clinically suspected CRBSI were enrolled. Peripheral blood white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophils percentage(NE%), the levels of serum PCT, dwell time of catheterization and outcome of the patients were collected. According to the diagnosis of CRBSI or not, they were divided into CRBSI group and no CRBSI group. We used receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to evaluate the value of serum PCT levels in predicting CRBSI in patients with clinically suspected CRBSI.ResultsForty-five patients with suspected CRBSI were included in this study, and 13 patients were diagnosed with CRBSI. Comparing to those in no CRBSI group, the maximum body temperature (Tmax) (p = 0.036) and the PCT levels (P = 0.013) in CRBSI group were both significantly higher. The area under ROC of the serum PCT levels and the Tmax to predict the CRBSI were 0.803 (0.95CI,0.660–0.946) and 0.680 (0.95CI,0.529–0.832) respectively. The PCT cut-off value was 0.780 ng/ml, with the sensitivity 69.23%, specificity 87.50%, positive predictive values 69.23% and negative predictive values 87.50%.ConclusionIt could be helpful to adopt PCT as a rapid diagnostic biomarker for first-ever acute stroke patients with suspected CRBSI.

Performance of differential time to positivity as a routine diagnostic test for catheter-related bloodstream infections: a single-centre experience

To assess the performance of differential time to positivity (DTP) for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). From all episodes of bloodstream infections (BSI) diagnosed during a 15-year period (2003-17) those in which a paired set of blood cultures drawn from a catheter and a peripheral vein were positive for the same microorganism and had a clinically and/or microbiologically defined source were selected. To assess diagnostic discrimination ability and accuracy of DTP for CRBSI, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and performance characteristics of a DTP ≥2h were computed. A total of 512 BSI were included, of which 302 (59%) were CRBSI. Discrimination ability of DTP was low for Staphylococcus aureus (AUC 0.656±0.06), coagulase-negative staphylococci (AUC 0.618±0.081), enterococci (AUC 0.554±0.117) and non-AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (AUC 0.653±0.053); moderate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AUC 0.841±0.073), and high for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (AUC 0.944±0.039). For the entire sample, DTP had a low-to-moderate discrimination ability (AUC 0.698±0.024). A DTP ≥2h has a low sensitivity for coagulase-negative staphylococci (60%) and very low for S.aureus (34%), enterococci (40%) and non-AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (42%). A DTP cut-off of 1h improved sensitivity (90%) for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Differential time to positivity performs well for diagnosing CRBSI only when AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and P.aeruginosa are involved. Performance is low for common Gram-positive organisms and non-AmpC-producing enteric bacilli; a negative test should not be used to rule out CRBSI due to these microorganisms. A DTP ≥1h may improve accuracy for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae, particularly Enterobacter spp.

Innovations in Quality Improvement of Intravascular Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

Significant reductions in catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) have occurred in the United States. Reductions in CRBSIs are attributed to the widespread implementation of the practice-based measures and innovations in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CRBSI. Diagnosis of CRBSI historically required removal of the central venous catheter (CVC) for catheter tip culture. Removing the CVC for CRBSI diagnosis predisposes many patients to potential life-threatening complications. Advances in diagnostic techniques such as culturing catheter hubs, catheter entry site cultures, applying differential time to positivity, molecular diagnostics, biomarkers, and innovative approaches like biosensors on the CVC lumen may provide an alternative to CVC removal. Removal of the CVC is common for the treatment of CRBSI; however, antimicrobial lock therapy is increasingly used as a CVC salvage method. Implementation of newer technology such as antimicrobial coated catheters, chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings, and antiseptic port protectors are crucial for the prevention of CRBSIs. Increasing evidence also support newer sutureless CVC securement devices prevent CRBSIs. CRBSI remains a significant clinical problem despite advances made in the diagnosis, management, and prevention. Molecular techniques are increasingly being used for pathogen identification in CRBSI, but the optimal diagnostic test remains debatable. Increasing experience is being gained with antimicrobial lock therapy for CRBSI treatment with catheter salvage. Use and adherence to practice-based measures and technological innovations has significantly reduced CRBSIs. Continued efforts are required to develop a cost-effective and targeted approach for CRBSI prevention.